Yeah. And Cheney was going to keel over too, right?
Sorry, but I don't buy that McCain is 4 years from death, yet is able to keep up the campaign schedule that he's running. He seems healthy enough to live out his term to me. I also don't think he's irresponsible enough to attempt to get elected if he knew his health indicated he wasn't likely to live out his term.
That argument is nothing more than a shameful scare tactic.
Perhaps you should read up about cancer a bit, having cancer once significantly increases your chances of having cancer again (often not just the original type of cancer) and until a cancer gets fairly advanced it has no real effect on your general well-being. He managed to beat the cancer once but he is quite old now so a recurance could well put palin in charge
no academics have just looked at thier chosen area for longer than you and have decided that more goverment changed are needed. elsewhere in the world this is not so pronounced
you clearly know very little about offshore drilling. The oil being there is not an issue its getting the oil out, and how much oil can be got out, and at what cost it can be extracted and how much oil can be extracted while still remaining profitable, that ultimately mean the environmental factors outweigh the possible economic boost.
OTOH without palin in Alaska perhaps oil Alaskan oil will be taxed less and the existing oil will make a difference.
good luck with that! my friends system is something like dual core ~3GHZ and 2GB and is pretty lame. granted it is running an ATI card which also lames up my linux systems. my friend with an intel card runs both well on an inferior spec, so it boils down to gfx card drivers sucking.
wait this was supposed to be a cheep shot a vista quick somebody pass me a chair.
You missed my point. McCain and Palin clearly have different opinions. He's more of a centrist, and she's clearly an extremist. He chose her to give those positions representation in his administration, which was necessary to get the base of his party involved in the election. That doesn't mean those positions will be policy in a McCain administration. In fact, it seems unlikely.
Shame the outlook for mccain making it 4 years is not that good. I dont mean this just because hes old but his past medical problems means there is a good chance it will be president Palin running for re-election
In contrast, the other ticket is led by somebody who is as far to the left as you get in US national politics, pretending that he's more towards the center than he is.
Says more about US politics than anything else, even Thatcher a pretty right wing warmongering leader in the UK was still for public funded health care, although like most right wing leaders her economics sucked.
somebody who is a creationist is an extremist round here, a centrist would most defiantly be pro-choice & against teaching creationism as science, pretty much anywhere else in the western world.
everybody knows the secret ingredient is lavender. what amuses me are the adverts that claim the ingredients for coke have never changed, despite the fact it used to contain coke.
OFC if your dealing with server, then it does make a difference for example Unisys 96 core offering (*nix & possible mac only) would be able to hold 256 SQL server databases... or vista pro
trickle down economy, wow that worked well for bush.
Oh, and for flaws of Obama - His Reverend and how about William Ayers?
So his flaw is a preacher that said some shit, unless Obama has a mind control device which he was using to control his reverend when the reverend gave those speeches they don't really count as obamas flaws.
tl;dr a creationist that thinks creationism should be taught in science class, is and i quote samuel.l.jackson ("the voice of god") when i say this,
"one dumb motherfucker"*
irrespective of your believes on how the earth was formed, life evolved, ect, saying that creationism is science means you not only don't understand science, but are willing to push forwards your opinion in spite of your lack of knowledge in the subject area.
*samuel.l.jackson was probably not covering the creationism as science debate at the time** ** he is also unlikely to have been playing the voice of god.
speaking as "the left" i would just like to say that i have been attacking bristol for having a second child out of wedlock (trac obviously being the 1st), because i felt that you as "the right" do not realise that this is what happens if your sex education is either "don't do it" or as McCain suggests you shouldn't even warn children about peadophiles so their sex education should be abuse.
this happened recently in the UK, a central London telephone exchange had lots of high tech equipment stolen, as were talking telephone exchange high-tech i cant imagine that being easy to sell either. So i suspect the theft may simply have been a cover to put something IN the exchage, if you were a high-tech pirate teamed up with a lo-tech pirate im pretty sure hacking into all of googles data would be profitable even if the PCs you run of with arnt.
It's also worth noting that the transition from 2d GTAs, which were great for their time but got old fast, to the 3d sandbox with cutscenes is a risk I don't see EA taking ever.
when the internets tell them that they could be safer and faster by clicking here, they will try it. google has a very big brand, much bigger than mozilla or opera and even most ie users use google so they will be told about it and find it easy to install
with linux i find that support often takes a while (especially IRC) but aslong as im friendly ive only had 1 problem (some idiot insiting everything was flash's fault) hell yesterday i actually got help from the developer of my webcam driver. the key is not to pretend that linux owes you something.
even if it means fucking up the environment for next to 0 gain
Yeah. And Cheney was going to keel over too, right?
Sorry, but I don't buy that McCain is 4 years from death, yet is able to keep up the campaign schedule that he's running. He seems healthy enough to live out his term to me. I also don't think he's irresponsible enough to attempt to get elected if he knew his health indicated he wasn't likely to live out his term.
That argument is nothing more than a shameful scare tactic.
Perhaps you should read up about cancer a bit, having cancer once significantly increases your chances of having cancer again (often not just the original type of cancer) and until a cancer gets fairly advanced it has no real effect on your general well-being. He managed to beat the cancer once but he is quite old now so a recurance could well put palin in charge
no academics have just looked at thier chosen area for longer than you and have decided that more goverment changed are needed. elsewhere in the world this is not so pronounced
Also, a (C) after O'Reilly's name is justified, but I don't think it would stand for "cool".
fixed
It a shame that that comment is only +5 because your my foe, because its completely correct.
you clearly know very little about offshore drilling. The oil being there is not an issue its getting the oil out, and how much oil can be got out, and at what cost it can be extracted and how much oil can be extracted while still remaining profitable, that ultimately mean the environmental factors outweigh the possible economic boost.
OTOH without palin in Alaska perhaps oil Alaskan oil will be taxed less and the existing oil will make a difference.
pretty lame as on about 256MB and 2ghz celeron i was running ubuntu WITH compiz (which btw blows the any vista 'eye candy' out of the water)
good luck with that! my friends system is something like dual core ~3GHZ and 2GB and is pretty lame. granted it is running an ATI card which also lames up my linux systems. my friend with an intel card runs both well on an inferior spec, so it boils down to gfx card drivers sucking.
wait this was supposed to be a cheep shot a vista quick somebody pass me a chair.
You missed my point. McCain and Palin clearly have different opinions. He's more of a centrist, and she's clearly an extremist. He chose her to give those positions representation in his administration, which was necessary to get the base of his party involved in the election. That doesn't mean those positions will be policy in a McCain administration. In fact, it seems unlikely.
Shame the outlook for mccain making it 4 years is not that good. I dont mean this just because hes old but his past medical problems means there is a good chance it will be president Palin running for re-election
In contrast, the other ticket is led by somebody who is as far to the left as you get in US national politics, pretending that he's more towards the center than he is.
Says more about US politics than anything else, even Thatcher a pretty right wing warmongering leader in the UK was still for public funded health care, although like most right wing leaders her economics sucked.
somebody who is a creationist is an extremist round here, a centrist would most defiantly be pro-choice & against teaching creationism as science, pretty much anywhere else in the western world.
everybody knows the secret ingredient is lavender. what amuses me are the adverts that claim the ingredients for coke have never changed, despite the fact it used to contain coke.
OFC if your dealing with server, then it does make a difference for example Unisys 96 core offering (*nix & possible mac only) would be able to hold 256 SQL server databases ... or vista pro
trickle down economy, wow that worked well for bush.
Oh, and for flaws of Obama - His Reverend and how about William Ayers?
So his flaw is a preacher that said some shit, unless Obama has a mind control device which he was using to control his reverend when the reverend gave those speeches they don't really count as obamas flaws.
in America, somebody with a creationist VP and pro-life position is centrist? you guys need to get out more
tl;dr a creationist that thinks creationism should be taught in science class, is and i quote samuel.l.jackson ("the voice of god") when i say this,
"one dumb motherfucker"*
irrespective of your believes on how the earth was formed, life evolved, ect, saying that creationism is science means you not only don't understand science, but are willing to push forwards your opinion in spite of your lack of knowledge in the subject area.
*samuel.l.jackson was probably not covering the creationism as science debate at the time**
** he is also unlikely to have been playing the voice of god.
speaking as "the left" i would just like to say that i have been attacking bristol for having a second child out of wedlock (trac obviously being the 1st), because i felt that you as "the right" do not realise that this is what happens if your sex education is either "don't do it" or as McCain suggests you shouldn't even warn children about peadophiles so their sex education should be abuse.
this happened recently in the UK, a central London telephone exchange had lots of high tech equipment stolen, as were talking telephone exchange high-tech i cant imagine that being easy to sell either. So i suspect the theft may simply have been a cover to put something IN the exchage, if you were a high-tech pirate teamed up with a lo-tech pirate im pretty sure hacking into all of googles data would be profitable even if the PCs you run of with arnt.
That's fine as long as they give linux back the modifications they made to his code
It's also worth noting that the transition from 2d GTAs, which were great for their time but got old fast, to the 3d sandbox with cutscenes is a risk I don't see EA taking ever.
The 2ds were even more sandboxy
now if only there was some sort of standard that sites could code to to be gauranteed interoperability on all browsers...
when the internets tell them that they could be safer and faster by clicking here, they will try it. google has a very big brand, much bigger than mozilla or opera and even most ie users use google so they will be told about it and find it easy to install
lets not forget no phishing protection, single process and slow javascript
my local domain:
my laptop
my hi-fi
my friends laptop
the internets
wait fuck it i don't even need to bother with this new drm the pirate bay drm system works for me
which leaves you with the flash cookies anyway, meaning that flashblock is useless for your 'porn mode'
with linux i find that support often takes a while (especially IRC) but aslong as im friendly ive only had 1 problem (some idiot insiting everything was flash's fault) hell yesterday i actually got help from the developer of my webcam driver. the key is not to pretend that linux owes you something.