Apple *is* able to hand over the messages, but is legally obliged to maintain appearances toward the public that it can't though a theatrical court process ?
This is paranoid, but is there any way to disprove this theory ?
so what, you should always condone unconstitutional laws, just because they have passed ? From my point of view, this is just another bs law to harass people...
Generally, the side which start to insult without proof the other side is the one running out of argument and relying on pure bullying to get to their point...
There is nothing new added by this which isn't already covered by some other law. Your blackmail argument is just FUD, just as much as anti-gunner threatening city's sidewalk will become bloodbath if CCW is passed. This is fear-mongering...
The caloric intake argument is still bs. If you drink a litter of gasoline, or about 8000kcal, putting aside its toxicity, you won't grow fat because of it. Eat 2000kcal worth of lettuce, and you won't be able to extract that much energy out of it as well because your body cannot break down the cellulose. On the opposite side, eat 2000kcal worth of pure glucose in one batch, and your body (especially your pancreas) will completely freak out.
Slashdot Mirror
I guess you believe Mike Brown did nothing wrong, as well ?
So, what is you plan to disarm criminals as well ? Because you do plan to disarm criminals, don't you ?
this is a red-herring argument totally unrelated to my previous comment...
Apple *is* able to hand over the messages, but is legally obliged to maintain appearances toward the public that it can't though a theatrical court process ?
This is paranoid, but is there any way to disprove this theory ?
How much encrypted throughput can the RaspPi handle ?
Worth, between host and local guests, ssh is really overkill.
On my LAN, I don't need encryption. If the NSA is on my LAN, I've got other things to worry about than just them sniffing on my pr0n.
Woz is an order of magnitude away from being a billionaire... https://www.google.com/search?...
Define "better humans".
where did your F-35 solve any of the problem mentioned ?
You got to ensure those top air force brass an happy and highly paid retirement...
I stand my point. Computers are controlling a heck of a lot of driving-critical elements.
CA law is superseded by Federal law.
which method did you use to reach this conclusion ?
I guess the bill will include an exception for LEO or other states agencies.
They *already* have the power...
Do you realize that you would be going back to the 70' without any form of computer in your car, not to mention decrease your engine efficiency...
We're talking about California, you are not supposed to have a gun to being with, this is Feinstein wet dream.
so what, you should always condone unconstitutional laws, just because they have passed ? From my point of view, this is just another bs law to harass people...
FWIW, this has notihng to do with libertarianism... I strongly oppose the idea of government intervention in this case.
Generally, the side which start to insult without proof the other side is the one running out of argument and relying on pure bullying to get to their point...
Califormia is hardly a red state...
There is nothing new added by this which isn't already covered by some other law. Your blackmail argument is just FUD, just as much as anti-gunner threatening city's sidewalk will become bloodbath if CCW is passed. This is fear-mongering...
The caloric intake argument is still bs. If you drink a litter of gasoline, or about 8000kcal, putting aside its toxicity, you won't grow fat because of it. Eat 2000kcal worth of lettuce, and you won't be able to extract that much energy out of it as well because your body cannot break down the cellulose. On the opposite side, eat 2000kcal worth of pure glucose in one batch, and your body (especially your pancreas) will completely freak out.
For some reason, you are on my "foe" list, though, I can only agree with your comment :-)