Ah, but you're forgetting that they have whatever value they can convince the insurance company that they had. Admitting that the archives were useful only for seriously obsessed historians would lead to a payout of much less than $3.3 million.
Going by her YouTube videos, she's an adult with her own house, her own husband (who already graduated from college) and a Pilates studio that she's selling (or sold) because she prefers to make movies.
Her father isn't likely to be deciding anything about what phone she buys, she's probably done with education and hitting an adult (even your child) is assault, which is a punishable crime even if the victim doesn't want to cooperate in pressing charges.
The positives are that the wealthy get wealthier. That's it. End of the positives.
You say corporations will move here, but corporations have already figured out how to channel profits through much better tax havens and pay even lower taxes than what Trump is offering. All those tax cuts are doing is cutting $1.2 trillion out of the government's budget over the next 10 years and driving up the deficit. We've been sold the trickle-down economic theory several times before and the deficits always skyrocketed and the GDP never ballooned up to make everyone prosperous. There's no magical difference in Trump's version of trickle-down theory.
You're say you're worried about doctors moving to the US, but the US healthcare costs have outpaced the GDP for quite a long time. The continued increase is unsustainable and the entire healthcare industry is looking more and more like a bubble that's about to burst. If your doctors come here, they're as stupid as the idiots who were buying hyper-inflated real estate just before that bubble burst.
In short, nobody really benefits from all this except the already entrenched wealthy. That's what happens when you let an unscrupulous multimillionaire decide who pays taxes and who doesn't.
That's an interesting idea. If you could covertly adjust the course of an asteroid as passed by Earth so that nobody knew why it changed, it would cause a huge reaction.
Any billionaires out there feel like trolling the entire human race?
more often than not, these "tax 'em all and let god sort 'em out later" plans end up netting and hurting small- and mid-sized business owners more than it does the truly-Wealthy.
Good news! There is absolutely no sign of "tax'em all" in Trump's current tax plan. The truly wealthy and large corporations will enjoy huge tax cuts (quite probably at your expense), but it definitely isn't anything that could reasonably be described as taxing everyone.
For just $200/month more, any workers sent to locations within two blocks of your house will have been screened to ensure they aren't pedophiles with a history of kidnapping, raping and murdering children.
Verizon is all about giving you the freedom to choose the level of service you need!
Firing all the local staff and eliminating programming will free up funds for stations to spend on staff and programming as long as you ignore the part where they no longer need to do so and won't ever spend that money that way.
There are plenty of studies about the effects of the chemicals listed in the summary on the human body. We don't really need a study to prove that inhaling them is bad just because you found a new way to disperse them into the air.
Yep. It sucks. The bands I follow on there have tiny followings and can't afford to pay up like bigger companies. Some of them have trouble making their rent on a monthly basis, but Facebook still wants to extort money from them to show their posts to their followers.
It's not so much different as it is an expansion. Now, instead of still showing posts to a percentage of followers, Facebook won't show posts from non-personal pages to any of the people following the page unless you pay up.
Blame Facebook. It's their terminology that's confusing things.
The News Feed is just the feed of posts from people you've friended and pages you've followed. Your sister's cat pictures are 'news' in this sense.
A publisher is just a non-personal page that posts articles. It could be a page run by a news publisher or a charity or a community organization. I follow half a dozen small bands who keep in touch with their fans through Facebook.
Some time ago, Facebook decided that following a page from a publisher is no longer enough for you to see all of the posts from that publisher. An algorithm decides who gets to see which posts you get to see what which ones you don't. At the same time, they added the ability for publishers to pay to promote their posts, which prevents the algorithm filtering them out of the feeds of their followers.
That apparently didn't make enough money, so now they're testing the idea of forcing all publishers' articles into a different feed. If you live in one of the countries where they're testing it, you won't see any of the posts on pages you've followed in your news feed unless the publishers pay to get them there.
Most people would think people arrested and taken away with no public explanation or accountability is a bad thing.
Or maybe you're suggesting that freedom of the press and the first amendment are a mistake? In which case, which government agency do you want to review news stories and ensure that they're "helping the public" in the government's opinion?
The reporting of crimes is may not thrill you, but it's a part of the other freedoms we enjoy. Eliminate them and you're well on your way to a totalitarian state.
Dude's father turned his ass in and the police walked in and saw him molesting his kids. This is an incredibly bad choice of examples to use in arguing for presumption of innocence.
Sanchez had been hospitalized for six weeks with radiation poisoning and still wasnâ(TM)t able to expose his skin to sunlight for very long. He was only 41 but looked like an old man, sun-weathered.
He wasnâ(TM)t wearing a shirt and had a large bandage covering his left shoulder and another taped over his hand. Radiation sickness can be fatal, but Sanchez said heâ(TM)d had on a thick jacket that morning and had only carried the cylinder a few meters. âoeLook,â he said, then slowly peeled the bandage to reveal skin that was still seared and pink. Normally, he said, he would have been out in the fields preparing for the summer rains, but he hadnâ(TM)t worked since that morning in December.
Minor symptoms, you say? Good thing cancer is an immediate thing and not a long-term risk after exposure, right?
He's arguing a far worse than that. He's literally arguing that the risk is more acceptable than the first responders being given radiation hazmat gear to protect them during the response because they might get too hot in it or trip because of reduced field of view.
For your comparison, it would be like arguing firefighters shouldn't wear a heavy fire coats when going into a fire because they might overheat or trip because of the reduction in dexterity.
Perhaps you'd like to volunteer for 20 CT scans of your entire body, including your brain and reproductive organs, in a row without any form of protection? That would give us some substantive evidence of the effect on the human body.
What will replace idiotic tech journalists who think that keyboards, which have been around for hundreds of years and are used by billions of people around the world, will be phased out in the next 20 years?
I'm as pessimistic about the future as just about anyone else, but even I don't think the future will be filled with dumbasses who only communicate through emojis and can't read or write.
Slashdot Mirror
Ah, but you're forgetting that they have whatever value they can convince the insurance company that they had. Admitting that the archives were useful only for seriously obsessed historians would lead to a payout of much less than $3.3 million.
Going by her YouTube videos, she's an adult with her own house, her own husband (who already graduated from college) and a Pilates studio that she's selling (or sold) because she prefers to make movies.
Her father isn't likely to be deciding anything about what phone she buys, she's probably done with education and hitting an adult (even your child) is assault, which is a punishable crime even if the victim doesn't want to cooperate in pressing charges.
The positives are that the wealthy get wealthier. That's it. End of the positives.
You say corporations will move here, but corporations have already figured out how to channel profits through much better tax havens and pay even lower taxes than what Trump is offering. All those tax cuts are doing is cutting $1.2 trillion out of the government's budget over the next 10 years and driving up the deficit. We've been sold the trickle-down economic theory several times before and the deficits always skyrocketed and the GDP never ballooned up to make everyone prosperous. There's no magical difference in Trump's version of trickle-down theory.
You're say you're worried about doctors moving to the US, but the US healthcare costs have outpaced the GDP for quite a long time. The continued increase is unsustainable and the entire healthcare industry is looking more and more like a bubble that's about to burst. If your doctors come here, they're as stupid as the idiots who were buying hyper-inflated real estate just before that bubble burst.
In short, nobody really benefits from all this except the already entrenched wealthy. That's what happens when you let an unscrupulous multimillionaire decide who pays taxes and who doesn't.
You seem to think "trolling the entire human race" involves making money. You may want to look up the definition of "trolling" sometime.
That's an interesting idea. If you could covertly adjust the course of an asteroid as passed by Earth so that nobody knew why it changed, it would cause a huge reaction.
Any billionaires out there feel like trolling the entire human race?
That'll also be useful if Harvey Weinestein stops by
That article is about Apple products. This one is about Windows products. Different audience, different random people modding.
I have a bottle of TylenoI capsules I bought in Chicago in 1982. I'm sure it'll be fine.
more often than not, these "tax 'em all and let god sort 'em out later" plans end up netting and hurting small- and mid-sized business owners more than it does the truly-Wealthy.
Good news! There is absolutely no sign of "tax'em all" in Trump's current tax plan. The truly wealthy and large corporations will enjoy huge tax cuts (quite probably at your expense), but it definitely isn't anything that could reasonably be described as taxing everyone.
For just $200/month more, any workers sent to locations within two blocks of your house will have been screened to ensure they aren't pedophiles with a history of kidnapping, raping and murdering children.
Verizon is all about giving you the freedom to choose the level of service you need!
Firing all the local staff and eliminating programming will free up funds for stations to spend on staff and programming as long as you ignore the part where they no longer need to do so and won't ever spend that money that way.
Wow. What a thoroughly fact-supported response to a strawman argument you've made. I couldn't possibly refute it.
There are plenty of studies about the effects of the chemicals listed in the summary on the human body. We don't really need a study to prove that inhaling them is bad just because you found a new way to disperse them into the air.
Yep. It sucks. The bands I follow on there have tiny followings and can't afford to pay up like bigger companies. Some of them have trouble making their rent on a monthly basis, but Facebook still wants to extort money from them to show their posts to their followers.
Greedy is probably more accurate than evil, but greed does usually lead to evil results so ... close enough.
It's not so much different as it is an expansion. Now, instead of still showing posts to a percentage of followers, Facebook won't show posts from non-personal pages to any of the people following the page unless you pay up.
Blame Facebook. It's their terminology that's confusing things.
The News Feed is just the feed of posts from people you've friended and pages you've followed. Your sister's cat pictures are 'news' in this sense.
A publisher is just a non-personal page that posts articles. It could be a page run by a news publisher or a charity or a community organization. I follow half a dozen small bands who keep in touch with their fans through Facebook.
Some time ago, Facebook decided that following a page from a publisher is no longer enough for you to see all of the posts from that publisher. An algorithm decides who gets to see which posts you get to see what which ones you don't. At the same time, they added the ability for publishers to pay to promote their posts, which prevents the algorithm filtering them out of the feeds of their followers.
That apparently didn't make enough money, so now they're testing the idea of forcing all publishers' articles into a different feed. If you live in one of the countries where they're testing it, you won't see any of the posts on pages you've followed in your news feed unless the publishers pay to get them there.
You do know that the person you replied to didn't mention IE 6, right?
Most people would think people arrested and taken away with no public explanation or accountability is a bad thing.
Or maybe you're suggesting that freedom of the press and the first amendment are a mistake? In which case, which government agency do you want to review news stories and ensure that they're "helping the public" in the government's opinion?
The reporting of crimes is may not thrill you, but it's a part of the other freedoms we enjoy. Eliminate them and you're well on your way to a totalitarian state.
The police were called to the house by Jaffer's father, Wagstaffe said. When officers arrived at the house, they found Jaffer engaged in the illegal contact with the minors
Dude's father turned his ass in and the police walked in and saw him molesting his kids. This is an incredibly bad choice of examples to use in arguing for presumption of innocence.
Sanchez had been hospitalized for six weeks with radiation poisoning and still wasnâ(TM)t able to expose his skin to sunlight for very long. He was only 41 but looked like an old man, sun-weathered.
He wasnâ(TM)t wearing a shirt and had a large bandage covering his left shoulder and another taped over his hand. Radiation sickness can be fatal, but Sanchez said heâ(TM)d had on a thick jacket that morning and had only carried the cylinder a few meters. âoeLook,â he said, then slowly peeled the bandage to reveal skin that was still seared and pink. Normally, he said, he would have been out in the fields preparing for the summer rains, but he hadnâ(TM)t worked since that morning in December.
Minor symptoms, you say? Good thing cancer is an immediate thing and not a long-term risk after exposure, right?
He's arguing a far worse than that. He's literally arguing that the risk is more acceptable than the first responders being given radiation hazmat gear to protect them during the response because they might get too hot in it or trip because of reduced field of view.
For your comparison, it would be like arguing firefighters shouldn't wear a heavy fire coats when going into a fire because they might overheat or trip because of the reduction in dexterity.
Perhaps you'd like to volunteer for 20 CT scans of your entire body, including your brain and reproductive organs, in a row without any form of protection? That would give us some substantive evidence of the effect on the human body.
No? Why not? You're arguing that it's okay.
Why wait? Since it's safe, surely they'll have no problem submitting to thousands of chest x-rays right now.
What will replace idiotic tech journalists who think that keyboards, which have been around for hundreds of years and are used by billions of people around the world, will be phased out in the next 20 years?
I'm as pessimistic about the future as just about anyone else, but even I don't think the future will be filled with dumbasses who only communicate through emojis and can't read or write.