her lawyer should have told her that the border agents have that authority... as bad as it sounds...
That's debatable. Customs and Border Protection decided for themselves that they had the authority to search cell phones without a warrant, but that's being challenged in court.
The judge brought up the the similarity to a 2014 case where the Supreme Court held that police have to obtain a warrant to search a cellphone and refused to dismiss the case, so there's a reasonable chance of justice prevailing.
Except they don't and they haven't for many decades at this point.
CEOs didn't suddenly start producing 17.6% more value in the last year while all the employees only produced 0.3% more.
The jobs of all the workers in all the companies encompassed by this study haven't massively turned over, so they're producing the same proportion of value that they were a year ago. If they were being paid based on the value they produce, the CEO's salary should go up by the same percentage as everyone else, rather than 58x as much.
The "attack" happened in http://thehill.com/policy/tech...">May of 2017 after John Oliver put up a website called "GoFCCYourself" which redirected to the comment page for net neutrality proceedings.
Also, Trump was elected in 2016, which is not two years later. The inauguration was in January 2017 which was still a few months short of two years later.
And yet all you're going to get is "Trump is doing great. Hillary would have been worse" no matter how improved their conversation skills are. That doesn't make for an interesting conversation.
It's more likely that it was written by someone with an MBA who adheres to the typical MBA mantra of improving the bottom line by replacing better paid, experienced employees in favor of inexperienced people who accept far less than the market rate for the position. They tend to be almost as cult-like as the anti-vax crowd, latching onto any and every justification for their belief regardless of how ridiculous or misinformed it may be.
The minimum monthly wage for an unskilled laborer in Kenya (which is more than a lot of rural Kenyans make) is less than the $50 monthly cost of the cheapest plans from the two existing satellite internet providers.
Launching satellites is expensive and customers have to pay quite a bit to make that worthwhile. Launching a balloon is a hell of a lot cheaper.
Voting machines decide who gets a huge amount of power in our government. Backdoor access via a software package whose source code had been leaked and exploited, leading to the manufacturer recommending that it be removed, is huge goddamn deal.
There's no allegation in the indictment that gravity exists, yet you aren't floating off into space even though you jumped to a conclusion with all your might.
John Stankey is an MBA who was in charge of DirectTV over the last couple of years while it's been hemorrhaging customers. He introduced the DirectTV Now streaming service which was supposed to boost profits. So far, it's only helped to offset the number of subscribers lost. Unfortunately, since it's a lower cost service, their profits have tanked.
Now they've acquired HBO and they want to make it cell-phone-friendly by cutting episodes to 20 minutes in the idiotic hope that doing the same thing will produce different results.
How will AT&T produce more shows without reducing quality? Stankey said that AT&T and HBO will have to "figure [that] out."
"I have an idea! Make more shows and more money! No, I don't know how to do either of those things. You guys have to figure that part out. Anyway, my work is done here. I'll take my bonus now!"
I haven't seen the video or interview where he said that, but yes, if he said that, he was lying. The car's sensors are active and it will brake and try to avoid hitting things, but the person with the cell phone is in control of when it moves and what direction.
this is the least important thing Slashdot could have posted about
Apparently you haven't scrolled down far enough to see the post about some analyst saying the new iPhones will be available in a "plethora" of five colors.
Using summon is just you driving our car remotely, so you're the one who is liable.
You use a phone app with buttons for forward and reverse to make the car slowly move forward or backward. You also have to be within ten feet of the car while you're doing it. If the car runs over a kid, it's entirely your fault.
Why is SF always speculating on us finding the remnants of a long gone alien civilization? Or them coming to meet us? Why couldn't we be the first ones to reach our current technological state?
Because finding nothing out there but more rocks would just be more of the same.thing we've already experienced. More of the same is never going to be more interesting than finding something new and different. Finding any life on another planet, even if it was just microbial, would be more interesting than finding another rock.
Besides, finding evidence of an alien civilization, even if it's long gone, would send creationists into the most hilarious series of apoplectic seizures the world has ever seen.
Sure there was. It was called "The Dating Game" and, while it didn't show sexual scenes, the questions and answers were filled with innuendo. As a bonus, one of the bachelor contestants was a serial killer.
This effort would be far better invested into improving already proven technologies like electric cars
Competitions like this are meant to spur innovation from smaller teams of people who might not otherwise develop their ideas into working technologies. A $1 million grand prize is a big deal to those people.
Already proven technologies already have companies investing billions into them and thousands of people working in R&D. $1 or $2 million more or less in funding isn't going to make any significant difference for them.
Slashdot Mirror
her lawyer should have told her that the border agents have that authority... as bad as it sounds...
That's debatable. Customs and Border Protection decided for themselves that they had the authority to search cell phones without a warrant, but that's being challenged in court.
The judge brought up the the similarity to a 2014 case where the Supreme Court held that police have to obtain a warrant to search a cellphone and refused to dismiss the case, so there's a reasonable chance of justice prevailing.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=remove+ki...
If he's the looser or loosers, he could probably get a job in an old-folks home opening jar lids for them.
For the most part, he didn't copy from articles. He copied from YouTube videos. That's how he got away with it for so long.
People get paid based on the value they produce.
Except they don't and they haven't for many decades at this point.
CEOs didn't suddenly start producing 17.6% more value in the last year while all the employees only produced 0.3% more.
The jobs of all the workers in all the companies encompassed by this study haven't massively turned over, so they're producing the same proportion of value that they were a year ago. If they were being paid based on the value they produce, the CEO's salary should go up by the same percentage as everyone else, rather than 58x as much.
Well, that link was fucked up. Here it is in better form.
http://thehill.com/policy/tech...
Could you be more wrong?
The "attack" happened in http://thehill.com/policy/tech...">May of 2017 after John Oliver put up a website called "GoFCCYourself" which redirected to the comment page for net neutrality proceedings.
Also, Trump was elected in 2016, which is not two years later. The inauguration was in January 2017 which was still a few months short of two years later.
And yet all you're going to get is "Trump is doing great. Hillary would have been worse" no matter how improved their conversation skills are. That doesn't make for an interesting conversation.
No, let them keep doing it. It makes it clear that they're aren't interested in any sort of intelligent response lets everyone know to ignore them.
It's more likely that it was written by someone with an MBA who adheres to the typical MBA mantra of improving the bottom line by replacing better paid, experienced employees in favor of inexperienced people who accept far less than the market rate for the position. They tend to be almost as cult-like as the anti-vax crowd, latching onto any and every justification for their belief regardless of how ridiculous or misinformed it may be.
You're severely underestimating how hostile the moon is to life as we know it. Even the dust will fuck you up.
The minimum monthly wage for an unskilled laborer in Kenya (which is more than a lot of rural Kenyans make) is less than the $50 monthly cost of the cheapest plans from the two existing satellite internet providers.
Launching satellites is expensive and customers have to pay quite a bit to make that worthwhile. Launching a balloon is a hell of a lot cheaper.
Voting machines decide who gets a huge amount of power in our government. Backdoor access via a software package whose source code had been leaked and exploited, leading to the manufacturer recommending that it be removed, is huge goddamn deal.
There's no allegation in the indictment that gravity exists, yet you aren't floating off into space even though you jumped to a conclusion with all your might.
you're simply walking down the battlefield with a full dress mirror?
The soldier of the future
John Stankey is an MBA who was in charge of DirectTV over the last couple of years while it's been hemorrhaging customers. He introduced the DirectTV Now streaming service which was supposed to boost profits. So far, it's only helped to offset the number of subscribers lost. Unfortunately, since it's a lower cost service, their profits have tanked.
Now they've acquired HBO and they want to make it cell-phone-friendly by cutting episodes to 20 minutes in the idiotic hope that doing the same thing will produce different results.
How will AT&T produce more shows without reducing quality? Stankey said that AT&T and HBO will have to "figure [that] out."
"I have an idea! Make more shows and more money! No, I don't know how to do either of those things. You guys have to figure that part out. Anyway, my work is done here. I'll take my bonus now!"
Nobody could have foreseen that a system with a 98% false positive rate in trials would fail to work properly when rolled out.
I haven't seen the video or interview where he said that, but yes, if he said that, he was lying. The car's sensors are active and it will brake and try to avoid hitting things, but the person with the cell phone is in control of when it moves and what direction.
this is the least important thing Slashdot could have posted about
Apparently you haven't scrolled down far enough to see the post about some analyst saying the new iPhones will be available in a "plethora" of five colors.
Using summon is just you driving our car remotely, so you're the one who is liable.
You use a phone app with buttons for forward and reverse to make the car slowly move forward or backward. You also have to be within ten feet of the car while you're doing it. If the car runs over a kid, it's entirely your fault.
Windows 10 as a whole isn't ready for prime time. It's a huge leap backwards in usability with more eye candy than a strip club.
It also offers access to a much wider variety of viruses than a strip club.
Why is SF always speculating on us finding the remnants of a long gone alien civilization? Or them coming to meet us? Why couldn't we be the first ones to reach our current technological state?
Because finding nothing out there but more rocks would just be more of the same.thing we've already experienced. More of the same is never going to be more interesting than finding something new and different. Finding any life on another planet, even if it was just microbial, would be more interesting than finding another rock.
Besides, finding evidence of an alien civilization, even if it's long gone, would send creationists into the most hilarious series of apoplectic seizures the world has ever seen.
You're bragging about digging through the trash for used lottery tickets.
I don't know if you're subtly trolling or if you're actually clueless enough to think that other people will envy you in some way.
There isn't a 1978 equivalent of Love Island
Sure there was. It was called "The Dating Game" and, while it didn't show sexual scenes, the questions and answers were filled with innuendo. As a bonus, one of the bachelor contestants was a serial killer.
This effort would be far better invested into improving already proven technologies like electric cars
Competitions like this are meant to spur innovation from smaller teams of people who might not otherwise develop their ideas into working technologies. A $1 million grand prize is a big deal to those people.
Already proven technologies already have companies investing billions into them and thousands of people working in R&D. $1 or $2 million more or less in funding isn't going to make any significant difference for them.