President of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA)
CEO of the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA).
..and surprise, he supported dumping public money into both.
The new FCC guy is Ajit V. Pai:
Associate General Counsel at Verizon Communications Inc.
..and surprise, he supports dumping public money into cellular broadband but not any other kind of broadband.
I dont understand why you suckers dont follow the money. We knew when I was growing up that the FCC was bad. Two generations later you guys got no clue at all, but we told you. We told you when net neutrality was spinning up that the FCC was bad and shoudn't be allowed to make internet policy. You were warned.
don't think anyone is saying that stealing wallets should be legal either and I'd suspect anyone making that argument to be trolling. But at the same time making something illegal doesn't prevent people from doing it.
I posit that the majority of people feel that "finders keepers losers weepers" is a wholly lawful belief and have first hand experience witnessing an entire poker table use this logic while discussing the arrest of a player at a neighboring poker table that found a thick billfold and pocketed it.
Sorry but regardless of how legal or illegal it is, society at large finds "finders keepers" to be acceptable.
But yes, this keeps coming up. Anyone that has used a crystal radio set knows how tiny the power is because they know that it is barely enough power to drive even a tiny little in-ear speaker (you know its barely enough power because you can barely hear it.)
If only there was a site on the internet that archived the contents of web pages such that even if the site is "blocked", "down", "DoS'd", or even "Hacked and defaced" that its unaltered unedited pages could still be viewed.....
One might want to call it a "time machine" or something... but Apple's got that name... so maybe something like "Wayback Machine" or simply "Archive"
Because there isnt a single legitimate criticism. Everything in it has citations to relevant scientific literature.
A bunch of really loud people dont need a legitimate criticism to silence all dissent of their non-factual non-scientific world-view. They just need to be legion, and loud.
Or she's just wrong. Choosing not to believe in something doesn't make it go away.
I was going to say something similar about the very same statement. While it may be correct for her to lie to her child, its still a lie. Hundreds of studies go into this very thing, even showing that as a society gets more egalitarian that gender differences in occupations increase rather than decrease.
When people are completely free to choose their occupation, gender differences maximize. People are MORE likely to choose what interests them in an egalitarian society, and the evidence is indisputable at this point that what interests the genders on average is different.
The average RN salary in the US is $67,930. Also, those are just base salaries
I really want to support those against this PC bullshit, but these two things do not jive together. Is it an average, or a base? Pick one. Can't have both.
A: It doesn't. Because you just called someone who doesn't self-identify as "SJW" SJW.
Who did I call an SJW?
An anonymous poster used the term, and someone else (jareth-0205) said the term was "bullshit" and "only ever used to belittle and contain"
Meanwhile, Canada has Social Justice Tribunals. Not only did the term have a positive connotation until recently, the term was codified into law.
Until gamergate, the term SJW lionized those it was attached to.
Since gamergate, the term SJW demonized those it is attached to.
The term goes back to at least the 1990's:
Baptist minister, the Rev. James Obey Sr's, 1992 obituary in the Houston Chronicle was titled, "Social justice warrior dies."
Its not my fault that you dont know dick about anything.
What he wrote isnt a campaign like you lied and said it was. The only campaign here is against him
Full stop, liar. You are a liar and semantics wont get you out of it. Stop being a fucking liar. Its really that simple. Its so simple that you will probably reply again because one thing that liars need is the last word.
I call on everyone with mod points to mod down these fucking liars. Destroy their karma. Liars arent good. Liars arent productive. Liars are just fucking liars.
Look at the summary above. It states he wrote a 10 page document.
..and anyone who read it knows that it is not, as you the fucking liar claims, a "campaign"... stop being a fucking liar. its really that simple. Stop being a fucking liar.
Slashdot Mirror
What is this deceptive ad for porn stuff?
Are they saying some of the porn links dont deliver porn?
..or install another streaming application.
Kodi with a pirate plugin or a solution like it will win because because then its all in one place.
You can add the unfunded liabilities that are currently bankrupting city after city to the conspiracy.
If there was a deep shadow organization trying to "save america" or whatever, you can be sure that this would be high on the list of reasons.
You only need about 1.5mbps for 720p video using yesteryears h.264 codec.
That covers entertainment.
The previous FCC guy was Tom Wheeler:
..and surprise, he supported dumping public money into both.
..and surprise, he supports dumping public money into cellular broadband but not any other kind of broadband.
President of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA)
CEO of the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA).
The new FCC guy is Ajit V. Pai:
Associate General Counsel at Verizon Communications Inc.
I dont understand why you suckers dont follow the money. We knew when I was growing up that the FCC was bad. Two generations later you guys got no clue at all, but we told you. We told you when net neutrality was spinning up that the FCC was bad and shoudn't be allowed to make internet policy. You were warned.
What fascinating to me is porn mags/nudes mags must get models permission to publish but a web site doesn't need any.
Do porn mags really need the permission of the subject to publish?
My guess is that in actuality the mag needs the permission of the copyright holder to publish.
Women call other women sluts. Men call them on the phone.
don't think anyone is saying that stealing wallets should be legal either and I'd suspect anyone making that argument to be trolling. But at the same time making something illegal doesn't prevent people from doing it.
I posit that the majority of people feel that "finders keepers losers weepers" is a wholly lawful belief and have first hand experience witnessing an entire poker table use this logic while discussing the arrest of a player at a neighboring poker table that found a thick billfold and pocketed it.
Sorry but regardless of how legal or illegal it is, society at large finds "finders keepers" to be acceptable.
Not sure if it was phones last time.
But yes, this keeps coming up. Anyone that has used a crystal radio set knows how tiny the power is because they know that it is barely enough power to drive even a tiny little in-ear speaker (you know its barely enough power because you can barely hear it.)
Here is a scientist interviewing the evil sexist James Damore
The credentials of Jordan Peterson is very significant.
And here is Jordan Peterson's interview with James Damore the poor guy that just got fucked by this bullshit.
If only there was a site on the internet that archived the contents of web pages such that even if the site is "blocked", "down", "DoS'd", or even "Hacked and defaced" that its unaltered unedited pages could still be viewed.....
One might want to call it a "time machine" or something... but Apple's got that name... so maybe something like "Wayback Machine" or simply "Archive"
But why lie about the contents of the memo?
Because there isnt a single legitimate criticism. Everything in it has citations to relevant scientific literature.
A bunch of really loud people dont need a legitimate criticism to silence all dissent of their non-factual non-scientific world-view. They just need to be legion, and loud.
My genitals take full credit for your ideas.
What I have concluded is that there is a problem with sexism in tech - but it's pretty much isolated to California, and perhaps New York.
No, the sexism is real, but its mainly from people that want to blame the opposite gender as a group for their own individual shortcomings.
You can add Jordan Peterson to the list, Phd'd professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto or whatever.
(they tried to label him a sexist once too, didn't stick)
Or she's just wrong. Choosing not to believe in something doesn't make it go away.
I was going to say something similar about the very same statement. While it may be correct for her to lie to her child, its still a lie. Hundreds of studies go into this very thing, even showing that as a society gets more egalitarian that gender differences in occupations increase rather than decrease.
When people are completely free to choose their occupation, gender differences maximize. People are MORE likely to choose what interests them in an egalitarian society, and the evidence is indisputable at this point that what interests the genders on average is different.
The average RN salary in the US is $67,930. Also, those are just base salaries
I really want to support those against this PC bullshit, but these two things do not jive together. Is it an average, or a base? Pick one. Can't have both.
I never accused you of lying about the number of pages.
Everyone can see that you are lying again. Another lie to defend a previous lie.
A: It doesn't. Because you just called someone who doesn't self-identify as "SJW" SJW.
Who did I call an SJW?
An anonymous poster used the term, and someone else (jareth-0205) said the term was "bullshit" and "only ever used to belittle and contain"
Meanwhile, Canada has Social Justice Tribunals. Not only did the term have a positive connotation until recently, the term was codified into law.
Until gamergate, the term SJW lionized those it was attached to.
Since gamergate, the term SJW demonized those it is attached to.
The term goes back to at least the 1990's:
Baptist minister, the Rev. James Obey Sr's, 1992 obituary in the Houston Chronicle was titled, "Social justice warrior dies."
Its not my fault that you dont know dick about anything.
What he wrote isnt a campaign like you lied and said it was. The only campaign here is against him
Full stop, liar. You are a liar and semantics wont get you out of it. Stop being a fucking liar. Its really that simple. Its so simple that you will probably reply again because one thing that liars need is the last word.
I call on everyone with mod points to mod down these fucking liars. Destroy their karma. Liars arent good. Liars arent productive. Liars are just fucking liars.
Look at the summary above. It states he wrote a 10 page document.
Stop lying, and stop modding up your posts with your sock puppets.
Both of these things are dishonest. Neither of them is going to work for you today, lying scumbag.
The people that read "the 10 pager" know that you are a liar.