I always thought that LGPL was created for this kind of stuff. I guess that if sony contacted busybox authors in a nice manner and if it was all for some good thing (bash-scripted gadgets!), relicencing would be fast&easy option.
Every time you users are hit by the "release early, release often" that you always wished, I hear you moaning.
"It's time to upgrade again."
Attitude of that sentence somehow doesn't fit on shlashdot for me. I hoped that it was _here_ where people can appreciate the last "big" and still free browser.
Rapid release isn't the actual problem for extensions - most of them are OK whenever you manually edit them and expand their version-support range. Basically, it is just another example of "why version number checks are totally wrong". I hope they can improve it soon with feature-presence checking or something similar.
The statistic shows percenage of actual project count, and doesn't anyhow respect the overall usage or size ("importance/weight") of the software.
I'm therefore afraid that the plot is biased by a large amount of tiny projects that are used by 10 people and choose some cc-by-sa alternative because it's simple enough and often a "default" choice.
In a landscape that far from large water bodies the nightly/daily temperatures differ much more than here. That can perfectly give them pretty annoying 110F during day and 40F every night.
[ ] One CowboyNeal reference per survey [ ] Two CowboyNeal reference per survey [x] Nothing meaningful per survey [ ] Only CowboyNeal references in each survey
You've now asked a herd of web-addicted sheep to behave against the will of their omnipresent God(dle).
I'm with firefox exactly because of the same reason (be it against google, webkit, almost-nearly-opensource-ware, or whatever). Sadly this reason counts as a 'feature' only for some of us.
How many crystals were needed to build a terran ghost anyway?
I always thought that LGPL was created for this kind of stuff. I guess that if sony contacted busybox authors in a nice manner and if it was all for some good thing (bash-scripted gadgets!), relicencing would be fast&easy option.
Every time you users are hit by the "release early, release often" that you always wished, I hear you moaning.
"It's time to upgrade again."
Attitude of that sentence somehow doesn't fit on shlashdot for me. I hoped that it was _here_ where people can appreciate the last "big" and still free browser.
"Chrome is 3X faster"
Dear sir, how did you obtain such an accurate measurement?
I always thought hackers made furniture using an axe. What is this computer stuff anyway?
Rapid release isn't the actual problem for extensions - most of them are OK whenever you manually edit them and expand their version-support range. Basically, it is just another example of "why version number checks are totally wrong". I hope they can improve it soon with feature-presence checking or something similar.
The statistic shows percenage of actual project count, and doesn't anyhow respect the overall usage or size ("importance/weight") of the software.
I'm therefore afraid that the plot is biased by a large amount of tiny projects that are used by 10 people and choose some cc-by-sa alternative because it's simple enough and often a "default" choice.
Also please compare with chromium.
Why does it look like a (laser) sniper rifle?
...whether someone welcomes our new mammoth overlords.
In a landscape that far from large water bodies the nightly/daily temperatures differ much more than here. That can perfectly give them pretty annoying 110F during day and 40F every night.
Don't talk to him, HE is the GPS device!
...that there aren't many stack overflows in C!
...someone here telling that mobile phones may not cause damage to us, but they certainly make bees behave weird and die.
He didn't look nor act like a magician, he probably had nothing to do with recent computers...
Actually this whole thing is pretty sad.
+1 with no mod points.
Did anyone manage to run stuff like gcc in this? It would make a _GREAT_ education tool.
(network access would be great too, but I guess that would be pretty hard with javascript...)
+1 insightful, but can't really mod you up without javascript...
Would you like...
[ ] One CowboyNeal reference per survey
[ ] Two CowboyNeal reference per survey
[x] Nothing meaningful per survey
[ ] Only CowboyNeal references in each survey
You've now asked a herd of web-addicted sheep to behave against the will of their omnipresent God(dle).
I'm with firefox exactly because of the same reason (be it against google, webkit, almost-nearly-opensource-ware, or whatever). Sadly this reason counts as a 'feature' only for some of us.
Well, I actually failed to find a project that would really depend on SUA. Anyone knows about anything that would be harmed by this change?
I hope it has a small pink heart image on the sillicon.
...because if you aren't already running some better DBMS, chances are that you are probably generally unable to panic about any DBMS quality.
Anyone got a backup of that video?
I would actually bet they just took mono and dotNETized it a little.