Slashdot Mirror


DARPA Investing In Electric Brain Stimulation To Train Snipers Quickly

New submitter Morganth writes "According to New Scientist, researchers at DARPA are investing efforts in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) machines to cut the time it takes to train snipers. From the article: 'a 2-milliamp current will run through the part of the brain associated with object recognition — an important skill when visually combing a scene for assailants.' The story also gives a nice explanation on the psychology of 'flow' — the state that experts tend to enter (e.g. programmers, tennis players, pianists) when focusing on their work." We covered similar research done on mice to improve their memory in September.

124 comments

  1. And That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's why I bought a Saturn.

    1. Re:And That's Why by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

      I want to see dead, burnt baby bodies. I want to see veins in my teeth.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:And That's Why by SpinningCone · · Score: 1

      Just watch out for those father rapers.

    3. Re:And That's Why by jdog-usa · · Score: 1

      I want to see dead, burnt baby bodies. I want to see veins in my teeth.

      Brilliant reference. I'm afraid that most people will miss the connection though.

    4. Re:And That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone loves Alice :-)

    5. Re:And That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a song about Alice.

    6. Re:And That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But who is going to pick up the garbage?

    7. Re:And That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the others from the Group W bench.

    8. Re:And That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alice? Who the f*ck is Alice?

    9. Re:And That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you damn well lived next door to her for 24 years... You should know by now.

    10. Re:And That's Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to share the reference?

    11. Re:And That's Why by jdog-usa · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant to do that earlier. It's from the song Alice's Restaurant by Arlo Guthrie. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjKF7aQthcQ

  2. Obligatory Matrix quote by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I know kung fu."

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Obligatory Matrix quote by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Me too, and that guy owes me money!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Obligatory Matrix quote by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 1

      "I know kung fu."

      Show me.

    3. Re:Obligatory Matrix quote by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Well considering it's sniping, it'd probably be something like "I know trigonometry."

    4. Re:Obligatory Matrix quote by Devout2 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Obligatory Matrix quote by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Far more to it than that.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:Obligatory Matrix quote by Captain+Spam · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was going to go with "Snipin's a good job, mate. Challengin' work, out of doors, and besides, the chip in my head says so!"

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    7. Re:Obligatory Matrix quote by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      You shop Ebay outdoors? Aren't you worried the glare will throw off your view of the countdown at the final moment?

  3. So, kind of overclocking by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1
    Overclocking the brain?

    a 2-milliamp current will run through the part of the brain associated with object recognition — an important skill when visually combing a scene for assailants

    1. Re:So, kind of overclocking by A10Mechanic · · Score: 2

      Remember, the bulb that burns twice as bright, only lasts half as long. (Unless you're using those funny looking bulbs, then my analogy goes right down the toilet) I don't want to be spoon feeding burned-out snipers in the home...

    2. Re:So, kind of overclocking by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain it's actually an exponential problem. Run 3 times the power through a traditional lightbulb and watch it "poof" in a second. Run a quarter of the power through and it could last a century (the oldest running lightbuld in the world runs at a fairly low wattage).

    3. Re:So, kind of overclocking by cmiller173 · · Score: 2

      An additional 2-milliamp current will be run through the pleasure center of the brain for every target correctly identified and eliminated. In related news, application to sniper school hits a all-time high.

    4. Re:So, kind of overclocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bulb lifespan (for incandescent bulbs) is proportional to the 11th power of the voltage. There not terribly linear either so it would be hard to give an exact figure, but I think "The bulb that burns twice as bright, only lasts 1 millionth as long" would be a far more accurate statement.

    5. Re:So, kind of overclocking by peragrin · · Score: 1

      actually hidden secret take a 100w bulb and run it at 75 watts of light output and presto a bulb that lats 10,000 or so hours.

      cutting voltage greatly increases projected life.

      The trick is they are trying to massively reduce electricity usage so they don't have to approve of more power plants.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re:So, kind of overclocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why long life incandescent bulbs are 130v rated.

    7. Re:So, kind of overclocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call that a mains voltage? THIS is a mains voltage! -> 240V

  4. Two of three categories by Talderas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So combined with the earlier article about guided long range bullets this technology would be the second of three pieces to accelerate training or open up the candidate pool. Now we just need the trifecta article about some sort of stealth camouflage system.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  5. obsolete by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Just in time to be replaced by drones.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not yet effective in all situations, so there's still a place for cyborg snipers.

  6. A declaration by The+Mister+Purple · · Score: 2

    I, for one, welcome our cyborg sniper overlords.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Feynman
  7. Reminds me of starcraft. by eexaa · · Score: 1

    How many crystals were needed to build a terran ghost anyway?

    1. Re:Reminds me of starcraft. by Talderas · · Score: 1

      200 minerals and 100 vespene gas

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    2. Re:Reminds me of starcraft. by eternaldoctorwho · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing: "Call down the thunder...."

    3. Re:Reminds me of starcraft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never say die...

    4. Re:Reminds me of starcraft. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      AAAARRRGGGGHHHH. I love how their deaths are so dramatic.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  8. what could possibly go wrong? by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1, Redundant

    sigh

    1. Re:what could possibly go wrong? by mark-t · · Score: 2

      I don't know... but it could certainly be interesting to find out.

    2. Re:what could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Queen of Hearts"

  9. Brain Stimulation Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perhaps more research should go toward stimulating political thinking into avoiding situations where snipers need to be rapidly trained.

    1. Re:Brain Stimulation Research by trum4n · · Score: 3, Funny

      The brain isn't the part of the anatomy that politicians need electrodes hooked to....

    2. Re:Brain Stimulation Research by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yea, I'm sure the leaders of Pakistan, Iran, al-Qaeda et al won't mind us rigging them up to some electrodes. Not at all.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Brain Stimulation Research by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Brains are a part of the anatomy that politicians lack entirely.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  10. Electroshock Therapy by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew there would be a use for that old Electroshock Therapy machine that I picked up dirt cheap from military surplus.

    If you wait long enough, wacky medical treatments become in vogue again. Like leeches, that are used for skin grafts.

    My original plans of using the Electroshock Therapy machine to keep the neighborhood kids off my lawn did not go down too well with the neighbors, the police, and various other government agencies. Until they found no law against owning an Electroshock Therapy, and threatening to use it on kids on my lawn.

    By then the neighbors wouldn't let their kids anywhere near my ranch anyway, so I guess it was effective after all.

    Now about my plans for opening a private sniper school . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Electroshock Therapy by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Now about my plans for opening a private sniper school . . .

      Where's the profit in limiting your potential targets to the E-1 paygrade?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:Electroshock Therapy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --> Where's the profit in limiting your potential targets to the E-1 paygrade?

      It makes the 99% smaller.

  11. Chuck... by Ramley · · Score: 0

    So we begin on the path to building an intersect. "I know kung foo"

    1. Re:Chuck... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... how exactly does one verb a verb?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Chuck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that didn't end well.

      I mean, literally. The last season of Chuck really wasn't very good and the ending sucked.

  12. Did I miss the memo? by WillgasM · · Score: 2

    When did we run out of snipers? Did they all just up and retire last weekend? Is there a reason we need a large numbers of snipers trained quickly? Is RL warfare turning into one of those CoD matches where everyone rolls sniper and stares at a window until someone with a shotgun creeps up behind them? Although this research sounds interesting, it strikes me as a solution looking for a problem.

    1. Re:Did I miss the memo? by jpwilliams · · Score: 1

      Just venturing a guess, but sniping, as opposed to other combat skills, seems a rather controlled, calculable (word?) action. Compare it to moving through a city in formation, disarming a bomb, etc. Don't get me wrong, snipers are highly skilled and gifted, but the complexity of the tax, I think, is better suited to a technology that augments the brains natural learning rhythms. In other words, it's not because they need more snipers, but because they need to test the tech. PS. Manchurian Candidate, anyone?

    2. Re:Did I miss the memo? by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      Better to get them with the knife, in CoD. Shotguns will paint you on enemy radar, besides being more effective at clue-ing in anyone nearby that there is trouble lurking around.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    3. Re:Did I miss the memo? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... and even then, if the training is fast and efficient, why NOT have more marksman-trained riflemen? It's not like engaging at a longer range with better accuracy isn't a good thing. It's not like a game where someone "classed" for long range is excluded from function at close range.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Did I miss the memo? by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      You are dead on. This is a solution looking for a problem and low hanging fruit for reducing DARPA spending as far as I am concerned. Granted, researching how to learn better is a worthwhile goal and probably a much more useful goal than teaching people to shoot other people.

    5. Re:Did I miss the memo? by couchslug · · Score: 2

      Snipers are a very efficient way to use lethal force.

      They avoid collateral damage, blowback from killing bystanders, etc. Ideally every soldier would be a proficient rifleman.

      Contrast with mortars, cluster bomblets, cannon fire, etc.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  13. Re:Won't 2mA stop your heart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would respond that it might stop your brain, but these are military personnel we're talking about here

  14. Wtf DARPA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't we just give the soulless drones at DARPA electroshock so they stop coming up with ideas to fuck the world up more and more?

  15. Snipers? WTF? by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TFA doesn't mention snipers. The description is of someone firing rapidly to supress an attack.

    Sniper teams (not just one person) work slowly and methodically by comparison. Identifying the target isn't done under the kind of pressure described in the article. And there's figuring the range and windage as well. Not something done at that kind of an almost instinctive level.

    And then there's the issue of muscle memory. A lot of shooting (accurately) depends on eye-hand coordination and motor learning to control superfluous movements that can mess up a shot. Will this stimulation do anything for that?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Snipers? WTF? by jpwilliams · · Score: 1
      This stimulation wouldn't directly effect muscle memory, but it's part of a whole system. I think more research is needed. It be interesting to see a situation where the brain has acquired the necessary pathways to be better, but the muscle tissue and peripheral nervous system hasn't caught up. BTW, TFA does mention sniping specifically. From TFA:

      Weisend, who is working on a US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency programme to accelerate learning, has been using this form of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to cut the time it takes to train snipers

    2. Re:Snipers? WTF? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the article is actually talking about designated marksmen or sharpshooters in general.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Snipers? WTF? by dontPanik · · Score: 1

      A lot of shooting (accurately) depends on eye-hand coordination and motor learning to control superfluous movements that can mess up a shot. Will this stimulation do anything for that?

      Actually the article says the exact same thing you said! In the article it says that professional soccer player's play-styles are different from beginner and amateur player's play-styles in that pros have less superfluous movements.

      --
      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:Snipers? WTF? by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 4, Informative

      From TFA:

      Weisend, who is working on a US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency programme to accelerate learning, has been using this form of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to cut the time it takes to train snipers.

      That's from page 2. Do more than skim.

  16. When can i buy my thinking hat (tm)? by SpinningCone · · Score: 2

    Read that article the other day, very interesting it will be cool when they pinpoint these areas more specifically and make a hat that can tune your abilities. i have read similar articles using electricity to shut down parts of the brain and people suddenly gain increased artistic abilities or math skills etc.

    i imagine that soon we could potentially have a consumer grade device that would help stimulate the parts of your brain to help with the task at hand or temporarily shut down the parts that would hinder.

    thought hat leaves the question about school work etc/ could you force employees to use it to make them better. could people who can afford one be getting an unfair advantage academically?

    1. Re:When can i buy my thinking hat (tm)? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Give a whole new meaning to "tinfoil hat", eh?

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  17. Larry Niven - Wireheads by jgunchy · · Score: 0

    Larry Niven has prior art on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirehead_(science_fiction)

  18. This is why we're not here for the long haul by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Funny

    We figure out a way to enhance human mental acuity, and the very first thing we apply it to is training snipers. Interspecies communication? Military dolphins. Never mind nuclear physics.

    If we were as good at anything as we are at killing each other and stealing each other's stuff, we might have a chance. Hell, if we were even more interested in something else -- and no, screwing doesn't count.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't screwing count, exactly?

    2. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bummer.. I was going to propose something to stimulate blood flow in certain areas of the body..
      I am over 60. I would use an implant like that.

    3. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Yeah, maybe the huge deep pockets that the military has can figure out a way to make a braincap. So what? DARPA built the Internet as a nuclear-weapons-resistant communications suite. Now it's a global information network that governments and media moguls around the globe are afraid of.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      My, aren't you an angsty badger!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screwing always counts....

    6. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      It creates more problems than it solves.

      Re: baby momma drama.

      Personally, I think most of the world's problems would be better resolved by deactivating those particular impulses. (Sex and violence are closely related behaviorally. Both are tied heavily to the endocrine system, and are mediated by the amygdala and thalamus.) Of course, complete shutdown of the responsible areas would be highly detrimental, as the same region is responsible for other emotional states, and for a number of autonomic processes.

      Still, selective suppression of lustfulness and violence would free people to become more rational and less emotional beings. Give our species' ever increasing long term impact, cessation of short term emotional solutions and thinking can only be a good thing.

    7. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      DARPA built the Internet as a nuclear-weapons-resistant communications suite.

      No they didn't.

    8. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why should a defense R&D organization care about other applications. If someone else wants to spend money to research the things you want they're free to. Meanwhile DARPA will put its money towards research for the military. That's their job.

    9. Re:This is why we're not here for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you referring to the urban legend of:
      IP/router protocols being developed to be a fault-tolerant comms system and then purposefully leaked to the Soviets to prevent an accidental
      dead-man's-switch-triggered GTNW?

  19. This reminds me of a movie and its stimulation... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    That movie is "Wanted" so you want to train a sniper quickly? put a loaded gun to his head, with safety off but actually pull the trigger if he misses the target.

  20. tried and true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    russians have used it to train astronauts since the friggin astronaut training times (at least early 80's). like what the heck! in the early 90's, when upgrade was due, they donated the old devices for medicinal purposes. these were as big as 3 briefcases, power adapter not included. don't ask for references. I feel uncomfortable writing about it as it is. good luck and good health

    1. Re:tried and true by MrManny · · Score: 1

      They are either upping the volts or discarded this approach for some reason. Russian spacecrafts come down in bits and pieces these days.

  21. My Greatest Fear by Bicx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My greatest fear with brain enhancement technology is that it creates a super-class of humans. Those who have the ability to pay for the technology will have a majorly unfair advantage against those who don't, creating a dangerously elite group of people.

    1. Re:My Greatest Fear by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      dangerously elite

      Sounds like a great name for a R.E.M. cover band.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:My Greatest Fear by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Me first!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:My Greatest Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My greatest fear with brain enhancement technology is that it creates a super-class of humans. Those who have the ability to pay for the technology will have a majorly unfair advantage against those who don't, creating a dangerously elite group of people.

      You mean like those who are rich have an advantage over those who are poor?

    4. Re:My Greatest Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, as if this isn't already the world we live in.

    5. Re:My Greatest Fear by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Those who have the ability to pay for the technology will have a majorly unfair advantage against those who don't, creating a dangerously elite group of people.

      Unlike now.

    6. Re:My Greatest Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there are some potential social issues with the concept of technology enhancement. However, what if the "elite" go on to invent new medicines, new technology, or pretty well anything that actually benefits everyone. Is the alternative, where those are never invented (or invented much more slowly) better?. I'm not sure people dying of cancer will object to rich elite cancer researchers curing them.

    7. Re:My Greatest Fear by smithmc · · Score: 1

      My greatest fear with brain enhancement technology is that it creates a super-class of humans. Those who have the ability to pay for the technology will have a majorly unfair advantage against those who don't, creating a dangerously elite group of people.

      Substitute "brain enhancement technology" with "smartphones", "personal computers", "automobiles", "airplanes", "telegraphs", "printed books", "arithmetic" etc. All technologies that confer some advantage are generally more readily available, and sooner, to people with money than to people without. (The funny thing is, I don't know if I'm making an argument that technology is a rising tide that lifts all boats, or that technology and its superior availability to the wealthy is a proof that trickle-down really works...)

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  22. Very Scary Stuff by bolthole · · Score: 1
    Two things that stand out from the article:

    "warns me that if I remove an electrode and break the connection, the voltage passing through my brain will blind me for a good few seconds."

    oh, yay. zappiezappie

    but worse:

    In the sudden quiet amid the bodies around me, I was really expecting more assailants, and I'm a bit disappointed when the team begins to remove my electrodes. I look up and wonder if someone wound the clocks forward. Inexplicably, 20 minutes have just passed. "How many did I get?" I ask the assistant. She looks at me quizzically. "All of them."

    This should freak you the hell out

    The beginnings of a "super soldier" program, that not only improves performance dramatically, but also disengages the higher brain functions ZombieSoldier, (c)US Army, all rights reserved(to the government)

    1. Re:Very Scary Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where you locate the cathode (-) and anode (+) makes all the difference- Go get a LM317 current regulator, a couple resistors, two 3cm square sponges soaked in brine, some wire and a battery. Hook + from the battery to the LM317 Vin, the resistors (1 or 2K?maybe a varister) between Vout and ADJ, then a wire going from ADJ to the anode sponge. Hook (-) from the battery to the cathode sponge. Play with the resistors / varister until you get > 1ma & 2ma. Put the cathode over your right front orbital, and the anode fairly far back on the left side of your head. Do it for 20 minutes.

    2. Re:Very Scary Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, use a 9v battery. Also, the output should measure LESS than 2ma.

    3. Re:Very Scary Stuff by Peristaltic · · Score: 2

      ... And, if you do this, you are a complete idiot. I wouldn't recommend it.

    4. Re:Very Scary Stuff by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      seems legit enough. thanks for the suggestion AC, I will get on it right away.

  23. FF reference by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

    (whipsering) Miranda. (/whispering)

  24. Great Read by dontPanik · · Score: 2

    Really liked this article. I've experienced "flow" to a limited degree when playing music and playing video games, it's something I'd like to be able to attain more. The only time I really enter "flow" when playing music is when I'm improvising with other musicians and I get really 'in the zone' with what I'm playing.

    --
    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
  25. Me likey! by broseidon · · Score: 1

    So.. when will this be publicly available? My K:D ratio for Modern Warfare 2 could use a boost..

    1. Re:Me likey! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Who's the douchebag that keeps dying?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Me likey! by broseidon · · Score: 1

      You forgot the "Who has two thumbs and.." part to your retort.

  26. One thing to take away by dmt0 · · Score: 1

    One thing to take away is that higher mental abilities come not from stimulating an area of the brain but by shutting it down. Do we need an external device to do that?

  27. I call hax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Great, now even real snipers have wallhacks.

  28. Re:Any amount of taxpayer money for U.S. gov viole by Defenestrar · · Score: 0

    Do your own research. U.S. government corruption is worse than what is described here.

    When I publish my own research I generally include citations. It helps one be taken seriously, although not always.

    Please do try again, it will make you a more effective at avoiding "flame bait" (because ACs can't really be guilty of trolling for karma - the line's got to be in the water for something else).

  29. Re:Won't 2mA stop your heart? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    You'll be fine as long as the magic smoke doesn't come out

  30. Reminds me of by Reasonable+Facsimile · · Score: 1
  31. flow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have experienced this while racing...as an experienced racer, you get into a zone and you just execute actions without conscious thought.

    1. Re:flow by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or sex, or even throwing and catching things! No wait, wrong audience. Well, there's always gaming. Or pinball. Or verbal communication. Or riding a bike. Shit, wrong audience again :D

      I guess with sniping the biggest challenge is to keep the question "what am I doing, and why am I doing it?" from popping up (in video games as well as in the military). Other than that, it's just a primitive case of what all of us do, all the time?

      Just an idea: if you're not in the zone, you're either learning something new (and too bewildered to get into any groove), or you're simply doing the wrong things (or doing the right things for the wrong people or reasons). Not being in the zone, like pain, is a warning signal. Tear down the corrupt, idiotic charade we call society, and there'd be plenty of "flow" to go around.

      But that's too radical, training monkeys is more their speed. The End.

  32. the great fookin' miliatry industral beast! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Really liked this article. I've experienced "flow" to a limited degree when playing music and playing video games, it's something I'd like to be able to attain more. The only time I really enter "flow" when playing music is when I'm improvising with other musicians and I get really 'in the zone' with what I'm playing.

    Gheezus H Ktoolo, heaven forfend they just burn a blunt!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  33. The Drake Institute by dave562 · · Score: 2

    These people use biofeedback to help with ADHD and other conditions.

    http://www.drakeinstitute.com/

    I did one of their treatment programs about a decade ago. There really is a "feeling" associated with being focused. Via biofeedback you can train the mind to recognize mental states in the brain. It is a very powerful and useful science.

    It seems like the military is taking shortcuts. Rather than going through a 6 month program, they are just pumping some current through the areas of the brain related to the type of learning that they are trying to enhance. It seems like it would be effective. Once the synapses have been formed, the training is more or less permanent.

    I wonder if they've considered piracetam or other nootropics to further enhance the process.

  34. Update of an old method: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    "You missed the target, private. I'm increasing the stimulation."

    *zap* "Ouch!"

    "If you miss the target again, I will increase it again. Do you understand?"

    "Yes, Drill Sergeant!"

    1. Re:Update of an old method: by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It worked in Ghostbusters.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  35. New Hiring Policy by geekfarmer · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, our policy is to wire up all our new interns. After the first burnout, or if their physician starts complaining about their body weight (forgetting to eat is a common side-effect), we give 'em a test. If they've learned enough by then, we hire 'em. If not, well, we're not running a charity here."

  36. Flow by Bensam123 · · Score: 1

    Even if it sound stupid, flow is a actual area of research for psychologists and the rather weird and interesting effects it has on human perception and reaction. It's really cool stuff and most people either take it for granted or don't even know they're doing it. It effects everyone in every part of our lives as well.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_(psychology)

  37. Re:That's right by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    I don't know about other Americans, but I see the world in 16 million shades of grey...

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  38. Focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reality imitates fiction. Similar but more refined way of manipulating brains was presented in Vernon Vinge: A Deepness in Sky.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Deepness_in_the_Sky

    I wonder when getting "Focused" will be obligatory for certain professions.

  39. Calling Dr. Venkman by sjames · · Score: 1

    Time to dust off the Zener cards.

  40. BOOM! Headshot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOOM! Headshot!

  41. Re:Dear DARPA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with this article... Every nice post gets moded to -1

  42. I can see it now... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Electric Brain Stimulation To Train Snipers Quickly

    Private: "I'm trying, but I just suck at shooting..."
    Drill Sgt: "I've got a brain-shocker here that says you don't."

  43. No!!! Whyyyy?!! by davewoods · · Score: 1

    At first, I though the title said "... To train spiders quickly" What a terrifying thought.