The hype and rumors surrounding Transmeta have constantly changed, but everyone seemed sure it would be the greatest thing since sliced bread. Honestly, I think Slashdotters are setting themselves up for a disappointment they haven't seen since the Phantom Menace.
NBC cries "unethical!" only because they didn't do it first. May they all screw eachother over with lawsuits, Slashdot is the only real source for news anyway. Hehe.
The NSA themselves aren't going to be the ones making changes to Linux, Secure Computing is. The responsibility for releasing modifies code lies with them. Both the NSA and Secure Computing knew the restrictiveness of GPL'd code before they entered into contract together. If they really had a problem with this, they would have went with one of the BSD's.
To see what the AOL/Time Warner media will say about Microsoft. For one thing, it's obvious Steve Case wants Microsoft dead, but now that he controls more media outlets than any single person, he could very easily start a FUD campaign against Microsoft in order to weaken them. But luckily, stretching of the truth would not be needed - as anyone aware of their unethical business practices knows.
While the BXA consulted the computing industry in order to revise and liberalize export regulations, the UK has done the exact opposite. It appears they flat out ISPs when introducing this nasty piece of legislation, which tightens export controls and INTRODUCE EMAIL WIRE TAPPING.
Before the issue was beaten to death, Slashdot used to post several articles/Features/Whatever dealing with the GPL. If you saw some of the comments then, people actually do believe they have a right to other peoples code - they shouldn't have to pay for it, and they should be allowed to copy it as much as they wish. In other words, people missed the whole point to the GPL and OSS
However, this poster (or troll), whether he/she/it realized it or not, pointed out how ridiculous that line of thinking is by trying to apply it elsewhere (such as a test). You responded with a logical argument that supports the ideals of OSS, and maybe someone else was better for have reading it.
Why am I bothering to respond to the responder of the imbicile?
What I find most amusing is that Xerox is suing 3com - the company founded by former researcher Bob Metcalfe who developed ethernet at Xerox PARC. Incidentally the same place unistrokes was apparently developed.
Anyone who does not see through LinuxOne as a sham, is an idiot. Anyone who will buy stock in this company just because it has the word Linux in it, is an idiot. Anyone who thinks that Linux is bad because a large number of people were idiots, is an idiot.
Now who does this really hurt, except other idiots? I hate to break this to you, but when it comes down to it, the incompetent by their very nature are not going to make one bit of difference. Those intelligent enough to judge something on its own merit will reap the benefits of it. And if that means less people using Linux, I'd be fine with it.
I know little about trademark law, or the conditions in which Linus Torvalds allows people to use the Linux trademark, but it is probably something like "You may use the Linux trademark so long as you give credit to the owner." Your welcome to investigate, the Linux trademark filed at the USPTO is availible here.
Linux refers to the kernel itself, and GNU/Linux or a Linux Distribution refers to a collection of software along with the kernel. Linux is trademarked by Linus Torvalds.
Both LinuxTECH and the UYLUG have expressed, through their conversation in open letters, their interest in protecting the Linux name. However, LinuxTECH does not recognize that Linus Torvalds is the rightful owner. I present to you a quote from the UYLUG's page:
UYLUG is aware of and recognizes that the trademark LINUX belongs to Linus Torvalds an the Linux community. We are making all the contacts and legal actions to defend this position.
In case these guys are rewarded the Linux trademark in Uruguay, I say the good people of Slashdot come up with some similar name suggestions to help the UYLUG out.
Second thought, let's not. This is Slashdot afterall, else Linux may forever be known as Loonix or (worse yet) Gnulix in Uruguay.
What a year this guy must be having. As former CEO of Novell, I'm sure that $150M settlement with Microsoft was a pretty sweet moment for him. All this topped off with an IPO almost guaranteed to go through the roof.
Your right, I think they would have won had they finished it. Although, with the DoJ going after Microsoft, would that really be necessary? I think what was most important to Caldera was that they made sure Microsoft finally received some justice. As stated on their Q&A page, they played a large role in future cases against Microsoft, and as long as they got the ball rolling they saw no need for an even larger compensation.
Caldera, on their site http://www.drdos.com gives an answer as to why they settled and what they think they were achieving here
An excerpt from their Q&A page:
Q: I thought Caldera filed the case based on principals (or to change behavior), not just to collect money. What did you accomplish?
A: We actually believe that we accomplished several things during this process.
1. We led out on the recent series of investigations into Microsoft's business practices. When we filed our case in July 1996, no other private company or government agency was publicly investigating Microsoft's monopoly-related behavior. Netscape, SUN, Bristol, the DOJs recent case, and several class action suits all followed our filing.
2. We told the story. Many new facts regarding Microsoft's business conduct were made public during the lengthy pre-trial period of our case.
3. We stood up against them. We believe that our actions will have a deterring effect against future misconduct. We have demonstrated that it is possible to successfully file a lawsuit against Microsoft and have a positive result.
4. We helped to brand Linux as a legitimate competitor to Windows. Our lawsuit, combined with the governments case, helped publicize and legitimize the Linux brand. We believe that as a result of these lawsuits, Caldera Systems, Lineo and other Linux companies are stronger competitors to Microsoft, now and in the future.
Regardless of what he says, a religous person might think, "The purpose of science is to gain knowledge. To gain knowledge is to see the truth. To see the truth is to know God." This is just an example.
On the other hand, an atheist might say, "He is too smart to believe in (a) God."
This is not a troll, I am an atheist, but depending on who is reading his response to your question, they will chose to believe whatever they want. The only purpose a question like this serves is to judge his character, but either way someone will think less of him.
If you could be alive to see just one major scientific breakthrough and its effect on civilization, whether in the past or in the future, what would that be and why?
Vulnerability found in CyberCash v 2.1.2 has been known for a while. Either these people didn't bother to fix their configuration, CyberCash didn't fix it in subsequent releases (if there have been any), or they continue to not take security seriously. For example, here is a summary of the vulnerability in CyberCash 2.1.2:
CyberCash v. 2.1.2 has a major security flaw that causes all credit card information processed by the server to be logged in a file with world-readable permissions. This security flaw exists in the default CyberCash installation and configuration.
The flaw is a result of not being able to turn off debugging. Setting the "DEBUG" flag to "0" in the configuration files simply has no effect on the operation of the server.
In CyberCash's server, when the "DEBUG" flag is on, the contents of all credit card transactions are written to a log file (named "Debug.log" by default).
Phase 1: We manipulate existing pest (such as rats and cockroaches) dna to make them luminescent.
Phase 2: Continue releasing genetically altered pests into their natural habitat (New York City, your vegetable garden the rabbits keep eating up)
Phase 3: Elminate and destroy. Hunt these horrific glowing animals during evening hours for best results. Suggested weapons: shotguns and boa constrictors.
Slashdot Mirror
The hype and rumors surrounding Transmeta have constantly changed, but everyone seemed sure it would be the greatest thing since sliced bread. Honestly, I think Slashdotters are setting themselves up for a disappointment they haven't seen since the Phantom Menace.
NBC cries "unethical!" only because they didn't do it first. May they all screw eachother over with lawsuits, Slashdot is the only real source for news anyway. Hehe.
The NSA themselves aren't going to be the ones making changes to Linux, Secure Computing is. The responsibility for releasing modifies code lies with them. Both the NSA and Secure Computing knew the restrictiveness of GPL'd code before they entered into contract together. If they really had a problem with this, they would have went with one of the BSD's.
To see what the AOL/Time Warner media will say about Microsoft. For one thing, it's obvious Steve Case wants Microsoft dead, but now that he controls more media outlets than any single person, he could very easily start a FUD campaign against Microsoft in order to weaken them. But luckily, stretching of the truth would not be needed - as anyone aware of their unethical business practices knows.
Deny @home users access to alt.sex.* for eternity and the rest will follow. You don't think they actually read anything else, do you?
While the BXA consulted the computing industry in order to revise and liberalize export regulations, the UK has done the exact opposite. It appears they flat out ISPs when introducing this nasty piece of legislation, which tightens export controls and INTRODUCE EMAIL WIRE TAPPING.
While I agree with what you said about most certification programs, there are some exceptions. The overview for RedHat Certification>/a> focuses on practical experience and prior knowledge of Linux. Though the program does include the standard multiple choice test, it also requires a 2.5 hour troubleshooting session.
Before the issue was beaten to death, Slashdot used to post several articles/Features/Whatever dealing with the GPL. If you saw some of the comments then, people actually do believe they have a right to other peoples code - they shouldn't have to pay for it, and they should be allowed to copy it as much as they wish. In other words, people missed the whole point to the GPL and OSS
However, this poster (or troll), whether he/she/it realized it or not, pointed out how ridiculous that line of thinking is by trying to apply it elsewhere (such as a test). You responded with a logical argument that supports the ideals of OSS, and maybe someone else was better for have reading it.
Why am I bothering to respond to the responder of the imbicile?
What I find most amusing is that Xerox is suing 3com - the company founded by former researcher Bob Metcalfe who developed ethernet at Xerox PARC. Incidentally the same place unistrokes was apparently developed.
Anyone who does not see through LinuxOne as a sham, is an idiot. Anyone who will buy stock in this company just because it has the word Linux in it, is an idiot. Anyone who thinks that Linux is bad because a large number of people were idiots, is an idiot.
Now who does this really hurt, except other idiots? I hate to break this to you, but when it comes down to it, the incompetent by their very nature are not going to make one bit of difference. Those intelligent enough to judge something on its own merit will reap the benefits of it. And if that means less people using Linux, I'd be fine with it.
Your right, Ransom Love was actually a Senior Product Manager at Novell, not CEO.
I know little about trademark law, or the conditions in which Linus Torvalds allows people to use the Linux trademark, but it is probably something like "You may use the Linux trademark so long as you give credit to the owner." Your welcome to investigate, the Linux trademark filed at the USPTO is availible here.
Linux refers to the kernel itself, and GNU/Linux or a Linux Distribution refers to a collection of software along with the kernel. Linux is trademarked by Linus Torvalds.
Both LinuxTECH and the UYLUG have expressed, through their conversation in open letters, their interest in protecting the Linux name. However, LinuxTECH does not recognize that Linus Torvalds is the rightful owner. I present to you a quote from the UYLUG's page:
UYLUG is aware of and recognizes that the trademark LINUX belongs to Linus Torvalds an the Linux community. We are making all the contacts and legal actions to defend this position.
I think that about sums it up.
In case these guys are rewarded the Linux trademark in Uruguay, I say the good people of Slashdot come up with some similar name suggestions to help the UYLUG out.
Second thought, let's not. This is Slashdot afterall, else Linux may forever be known as Loonix or (worse yet) Gnulix in Uruguay.
What a year this guy must be having. As former CEO of Novell, I'm sure that $150M settlement with Microsoft was a pretty sweet moment for him. All this topped off with an IPO almost guaranteed to go through the roof.
Your right, I think they would have won had they finished it. Although, with the DoJ going after Microsoft, would that really be necessary? I think what was most important to Caldera was that they made sure Microsoft finally received some justice. As stated on their Q&A page, they played a large role in future cases against Microsoft, and as long as they got the ball rolling they saw no need for an even larger compensation.
Caldera, on their site http://www.drdos.com gives an answer as to why they settled and what they think they were achieving here
An excerpt from their Q&A page:
Q: I thought Caldera filed the case based on principals (or to change behavior), not just to collect money. What did you accomplish?
A: We actually believe that we accomplished several things during this process.
1. We led out on the recent series of investigations into Microsoft's business practices. When we filed our case in July 1996, no other private company or government agency was publicly investigating Microsoft's monopoly-related behavior. Netscape, SUN, Bristol, the DOJs recent case, and several class action suits all followed our filing.
2. We told the story. Many new facts regarding Microsoft's business conduct were made public during the lengthy pre-trial period of our case.
3. We stood up against them. We believe that our actions will have a deterring effect against future misconduct. We have demonstrated that it is possible to successfully file a lawsuit against Microsoft and have a positive result.
4. We helped to brand Linux as a legitimate competitor to Windows. Our lawsuit, combined with the governments case, helped publicize and legitimize the Linux brand. We believe that as a result of these lawsuits, Caldera Systems, Lineo and other Linux companies are stronger competitors to Microsoft, now and in the future.
Regardless of what he says, a religous person might think, "The purpose of science is to gain knowledge. To gain knowledge is to see the truth. To see the truth is to know God." This is just an example.
On the other hand, an atheist might say, "He is too smart to believe in (a) God."
This is not a troll, I am an atheist, but depending on who is reading his response to your question, they will chose to believe whatever they want. The only purpose a question like this serves is to judge his character, but either way someone will think less of him.
Subway, 12 pack of coke, and 15 pounds of candy a day. What's so hard about that?
If you could be alive to see just one major scientific breakthrough and its effect on civilization, whether in the past or in the future, what would that be and why?
Vulnerability found in CyberCash v 2.1.2 has been known for a while. Either these people didn't bother to fix their configuration, CyberCash didn't fix it in subsequent releases (if there have been any), or they continue to not take security seriously. For example, here is a summary of the vulnerability in CyberCash 2.1.2:
CyberCash v. 2.1.2 has a major security flaw that causes all credit card information processed by the server to be logged in a file with world-readable permissions. This security flaw exists in the default CyberCash installation and configuration.
The flaw is a result of not being able to turn off debugging. Setting the "DEBUG" flag to "0" in the configuration files simply has no effect on the operation of the server.
In CyberCash's server, when the "DEBUG" flag is on, the contents of all credit card transactions are written to a log file (named "Debug.log" by default).
Check out the Bootstrap Institute as well as a Biography of him and his accomplishments.
He is not trying to milk you for an extra buck
Of course not, and plastic light sabers plus thousands of other toys are for the childrens happiness.
The man is a billionaire. He doesn't need an extra buck.
Well maybe on paper. This means if isn't constantly trying to make an extra buck, his financial status could change.
He fancies himself as an artist
He is a businessman first. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he is all that bad. But if you actually believe everything you just said, well...
I hope we are through with these TPM DVD stories for a while.
Amen.
The benefits of this technology are enormous:
Phase 1: We manipulate existing pest (such as rats and cockroaches) dna to make them luminescent.
Phase 2: Continue releasing genetically altered pests into their natural habitat (New York City, your vegetable garden the rabbits keep eating up)
Phase 3: Elminate and destroy. Hunt these horrific glowing animals during evening hours for best results. Suggested weapons: shotguns and boa constrictors.