Depends on the type of bully. If it is the stupid dorky kind, maybe. But these days, kids aren't stupid like that. They often hide behind crowd and trip you, bag you in bathroom, poisoned your lunch, and spread rumours about you. Sure, you can standup if you know who is the bully, but it wouldn't solve a thing by beating the bully up because the bully isn't stupid enough to get into a situation where he/she will face you alone. And when you do fight back physically, the bully will make a fuss and report to authority.
Is there any reason that a bully must be a he? During elementary/high school, the most creative kind of bully that you cannot get away with tends to be female.
I take it you were in school back when there is no zero-tolerant policy? Didn't you know that if you don't run away in any fight, you will most likely be kicked out of school, even though you didn't hit anyone?
The only way to stand-up without consequences, is to talk the bully out of fight.
You are contradicting yourself. You describe a scissors in a physical sense that it is cosmologically long, then why do you concluded that when they are closing does it move faster than speed of light, instead of the blades bending themselves when closing?
You people are comparing apple with orange. C and C++ are used where memory management and performance is critical; whereas Java is usually used in a enterprise system that focus more on business logic then about when a 1 should shows up in a CPU register etc... Of course, you can write a context switch in Java, but I would doubt its usefulness.
In practice, it is best to use the highest level language available for a given problem. You can't just compare language itself, it is just a tool to do its job. How you do the job is what determines security.
I don't think the one encouraging others to commit suicide is any more rational than the victim. Either punish them both, or give both treatment. He probably need as much educational camp as the suicidal.
There is not a self in a collective, so it isn't called selfish. Sometimes, it is indeed sacrificing for a greater goods; however important to set priority with what are considered greater goods. When people live for their own live for their own greed, the more able one will often take advantage of the inept. Of course, one should think for their own live, but other people's value also need to be taken into consideration. Otherwise, civilization will not work.
There are also people who sell both their soul and bodies looking down at people who sell neither because they cover their eyes and ears instead of facing reality. But reality is only a perception, we can be babe in wickedness and be completely ignorance of the sins of the world; but we can also be cynical and live to sacrifice our life in order to make the world a better living place. If everyone is ignorance, sins will cease to be; but if everyone is cynical, we ourselves is reinforcing the social construction. Thus, as long as we strike to be a better person and live a life of no remorse, it is good enough.
It depends on how one define offense. One can done no immediate harm to some arbitrarily person, but is still an offense to him/herself because he/she objectified people. It is not the viewing of pornography, but the motive and idea behind it that matters. Idea have consequences.
However, human are not perfect, and there is a different between reality and fantasy. Nevertheless, exactly because we are not perfect do we continue to strive for a better society, where people are not judged based on their look nor any physical asset. A mile journey starts with a single step.
Without darkness, we cannot see the light either. But without law, people may not even know about their sin either. One cannot exist without the other. So how do we know if someone committed a crime; we can only guess based on what they do and what we believe their intentions are.
As long as you don't tease him yourself, I don't see why other people would care what a random boy wear. If it is so much problem, one can always talk to the education board and request to keep you son's gender confidential; then no one can tease him because they wouldn't even know if it is a boy or girl!
On the other hand, you can teach him how to out talk everyone, teach him how to out run everyone, and how to eat faster than anyone, then surely, no one can tease get him. Better yet, just raise him as a girl.
Depends, the so-called Satan is a recent invention.
Just look at the old testament, it is commonly believed during those time that everything proceed according to God's will, that God harden Pharaoh's heart and kill all first born of Egypt. This I found is a better model because in real life, shit happens, and it happens because of cause and effect, which is what the notion of God is originally modeled after.
Nevertheless, the "male" and "female" aspect has been so generalized that I have no idea what they mean anymore.
If we agree that risk-taking, proving oneself, and acting weird is acting like men, then we are fulfilling our own prophecy because people love to give what we expect from them. Gender is social constructed, we see what we wish to believe, therefore they exist. Otherwise, breeder asides, is there any other reason to differentiate gender in daily life?
I think you have misunderstand. Dating != sexual intercourse, which should be reserved for marriage in my opinion. There is more to life than physical gratification, by adding sex to dating, you will only complicate things further.
Although the lack of such knowledge is marveling, that is not even remotely important compares to say, how such culture is gender typing people.
You sounds as if stay-at-home wife is better than wife who have a job, which I cannot agree with. There are many ways to be a good mother, staying at home all day or not, is not even close to important, compares to for example, educations, personal management skills, wisdom, etc...
In fact, I would argue that wives who works acquire more educations, wisdom, and other skills set that are important for mothers.
Sorry for the late reply, but what I meant was that at contain point, you can either have high cohesion, or loose coupling, not both. In real time application, high cohesion maybe more important than loose coupling. Of course, you can go for both low cohesion and tight coupling, but I am assuming the programmers are competent people.
However, in this case, she is only facing audit because she win. If being born masculine isn't qualified, why on earth can she participle in the first place? If it is about fairness, let the test be conducted before the game, not afterward.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah yeah, on Kubuntu, it is called K-Spot.
And engineer doesn't need creative person nor entertainment?
Surely, they can use their frustration on something more productive, like world domination.
There are such policy now, something that the Conservatives cook up if my memory serves me right.
Depends on the type of bully. If it is the stupid dorky kind, maybe. But these days, kids aren't stupid like that. They often hide behind crowd and trip you, bag you in bathroom, poisoned your lunch, and spread rumours about you. Sure, you can standup if you know who is the bully, but it wouldn't solve a thing by beating the bully up because the bully isn't stupid enough to get into a situation where he/she will face you alone. And when you do fight back physically, the bully will make a fuss and report to authority.
Is there any reason that a bully must be a he? During elementary/high school, the most creative kind of bully that you cannot get away with tends to be female.
I take it you were in school back when there is no zero-tolerant policy? Didn't you know that if you don't run away in any fight, you will most likely be kicked out of school, even though you didn't hit anyone?
The only way to stand-up without consequences, is to talk the bully out of fight.
You are contradicting yourself. You describe a scissors in a physical sense that it is cosmologically long, then why do you concluded that when they are closing does it move faster than speed of light, instead of the blades bending themselves when closing?
You people are comparing apple with orange. C and C++ are used where memory management and performance is critical; whereas Java is usually used in a enterprise system that focus more on business logic then about when a 1 should shows up in a CPU register etc... Of course, you can write a context switch in Java, but I would doubt its usefulness.
In practice, it is best to use the highest level language available for a given problem. You can't just compare language itself, it is just a tool to do its job. How you do the job is what determines security.
I don't think the one encouraging others to commit suicide is any more rational than the victim. Either punish them both, or give both treatment. He probably need as much educational camp as the suicidal.
There is not a self in a collective, so it isn't called selfish. Sometimes, it is indeed sacrificing for a greater goods; however important to set priority with what are considered greater goods. When people live for their own live for their own greed, the more able one will often take advantage of the inept. Of course, one should think for their own live, but other people's value also need to be taken into consideration. Otherwise, civilization will not work.
Wow, I didn't realize 4chan has a tech section. Thanks.
There was one in my area. But they closed down after I complained that maid doesn't dress like that in real life...
There are also people who sell both their soul and bodies looking down at people who sell neither because they cover their eyes and ears instead of facing reality. But reality is only a perception, we can be babe in wickedness and be completely ignorance of the sins of the world; but we can also be cynical and live to sacrifice our life in order to make the world a better living place. If everyone is ignorance, sins will cease to be; but if everyone is cynical, we ourselves is reinforcing the social construction. Thus, as long as we strike to be a better person and live a life of no remorse, it is good enough.
It depends on how one define offense. One can done no immediate harm to some arbitrarily person, but is still an offense to him/herself because he/she objectified people. It is not the viewing of pornography, but the motive and idea behind it that matters. Idea have consequences.
However, human are not perfect, and there is a different between reality and fantasy. Nevertheless, exactly because we are not perfect do we continue to strive for a better society, where people are not judged based on their look nor any physical asset. A mile journey starts with a single step.
Without darkness, we cannot see the light either. But without law, people may not even know about their sin either. One cannot exist without the other. So how do we know if someone committed a crime; we can only guess based on what they do and what we believe their intentions are.
As long as you don't tease him yourself, I don't see why other people would care what a random boy wear. If it is so much problem, one can always talk to the education board and request to keep you son's gender confidential; then no one can tease him because they wouldn't even know if it is a boy or girl!
On the other hand, you can teach him how to out talk everyone, teach him how to out run everyone, and how to eat faster than anyone, then surely, no one can tease get him. Better yet, just raise him as a girl.
The one in Canada is called University of Waterloo, not Waterloo University.
Depends, the so-called Satan is a recent invention.
Just look at the old testament, it is commonly believed during those time that everything proceed according to God's will, that God harden Pharaoh's heart and kill all first born of Egypt. This I found is a better model because in real life, shit happens, and it happens because of cause and effect, which is what the notion of God is originally modeled after.
Hymen means nothing.
Nevertheless, the "male" and "female" aspect has been so generalized that I have no idea what they mean anymore.
If we agree that risk-taking, proving oneself, and acting weird is acting like men, then we are fulfilling our own prophecy because people love to give what we expect from them. Gender is social constructed, we see what we wish to believe, therefore they exist. Otherwise, breeder asides, is there any other reason to differentiate gender in daily life?
Nevertheless, people are not rational. It is not impossible that the defendant is misinformed.
We shouldn't judge people guilty just because what they did isn't rational.
I think you have misunderstand. Dating != sexual intercourse, which should be reserved for marriage in my opinion. There is more to life than physical gratification, by adding sex to dating, you will only complicate things further.
Although the lack of such knowledge is marveling, that is not even remotely important compares to say, how such culture is gender typing people.
You sounds as if stay-at-home wife is better than wife who have a job, which I cannot agree with. There are many ways to be a good mother, staying at home all day or not, is not even close to important, compares to for example, educations, personal management skills, wisdom, etc...
In fact, I would argue that wives who works acquire more educations, wisdom, and other skills set that are important for mothers.
Sorry for the late reply, but what I meant was that at contain point, you can either have high cohesion, or loose coupling, not both. In real time application, high cohesion maybe more important than loose coupling. Of course, you can go for both low cohesion and tight coupling, but I am assuming the programmers are competent people.
However, in this case, she is only facing audit because she win. If being born masculine isn't qualified, why on earth can she participle in the first place? If it is about fairness, let the test be conducted before the game, not afterward.