I'm not saying be paranoid , I'm saying if you are not to some extent you may have to deal with only 1 of the 100 users who use the Remote Access Option going haywire and/or just misplacing some data about you're clients and then your company is in 4 feet of cow dung and everyone will be pointing at first the finger to your manager and then to you.
No paranoid , just very very uptight will do it.
Naa, a user should only have remote access on one condition: emergency action ( for high availability). If you're company can afford remote access just for fun and is not a decision based on critical resource availability, then this conversation is futile since : why in the hell would you want a policy for VPN if you allow people connecting anytime they want to?Remote access should only be used in case of dire need.
It's fairly simple, you make him a user on the laptop ( no bloody admin rights, everything should be encrypted on his laptop, he should be a admin or have special rights at work for him to be allowed to connect, only not in working hours) , you install a software(proprietary) that recognizes a PCMCIA card that is emitted to the user specifically( it's user acount&certificate. The card is pin protected. For him to connect he should be calling HD and request permission, gives the reason and specifies hours needed to work.
and/or having news of "possible" (not probable ) super implementations of technology infant discoveries attracts people and therefore money.
Needles to say that all , and i mean all, the news seem to succomb some information about what fact they are preaching that will almost always turn the wheel in another direction. if you can turn a wheel in a direction that is. point of reference i mean.
Here Here. I concur. When talking about managing , the bloody thing is managed by only by 2 guys ( considering backup ). we have 1.5 Terra of data and it grinds it ( almost 80% ) in 8 hours @ night. The thing is absolutely brilliant through many things but one in particular. if you have to update your hardware, all data/programs/objects only need to be restored to the new hardware ( no compiling, no nothing) and it works. moving from CISC processor to RISC. ( 32 to 64 ) it only required moving the data to the new hardware and presto; former 32bit programs were fully functional 64bit programs.
TIMI is more than a character in South Park
Not the full extent of the movie, but in one way the same. more powerful by doing nothing.
Also, must be noted: good for astronauts when coming back to earth from long "exposure " to microgravity.
muscle distrofy
we'll the US did sign the Kyoto protocol , but as we see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol it has failed to ratify the damn thing, due to it being a rock in the evolution of it's economy. 'nuf said.
The problem is that there are too many problems political,economical, sociological that develop when you start ratifying a protocol like that.
Slashdot Mirror
This has actually scared me. where i live i pay 20$ for unlimited transfer at 100Gb/s fiber link . This is in Romania.
Game rape ? Second hand games? Impossibility to replay the game ? What is the point? If the game don't work you can replace it... so no harm no foul.
working with chaotic lasers is much fun, and considering that chaos is the last revolution in physics ( some say ) it would be quite interesting
I'm not saying be paranoid , I'm saying if you are not to some extent you may have to deal with only 1 of the 100 users who use the Remote Access Option going haywire and/or just misplacing some data about you're clients and then your company is in 4 feet of cow dung and everyone will be pointing at first the finger to your manager and then to you. No paranoid , just very very uptight will do it.
Naa, a user should only have remote access on one condition: emergency action ( for high availability). If you're company can afford remote access just for fun and is not a decision based on critical resource availability, then this conversation is futile since : why in the hell would you want a policy for VPN if you allow people connecting anytime they want to?Remote access should only be used in case of dire need.
It's fairly simple, you make him a user on the laptop ( no bloody admin rights, everything should be encrypted on his laptop, he should be a admin or have special rights at work for him to be allowed to connect, only not in working hours) , you install a software(proprietary) that recognizes a PCMCIA card that is emitted to the user specifically( it's user acount&certificate. The card is pin protected. For him to connect he should be calling HD and request permission, gives the reason and specifies hours needed to work.
and/or having news of "possible" (not probable ) super implementations of technology infant discoveries attracts people and therefore money. Needles to say that all , and i mean all, the news seem to succomb some information about what fact they are preaching that will almost always turn the wheel in another direction. if you can turn a wheel in a direction that is. point of reference i mean.
"This discovery may lead to the" will become "This discovery has lead to the"
Here Here. I concur. When talking about managing , the bloody thing is managed by only by 2 guys ( considering backup ). we have 1.5 Terra of data and it grinds it ( almost 80% ) in 8 hours @ night. The thing is absolutely brilliant through many things but one in particular. if you have to update your hardware, all data/programs/objects only need to be restored to the new hardware ( no compiling, no nothing) and it works. moving from CISC processor to RISC. ( 32 to 64 ) it only required moving the data to the new hardware and presto; former 32bit programs were fully functional 64bit programs. TIMI is more than a character in South Park
Not the full extent of the movie, but in one way the same. more powerful by doing nothing. Also, must be noted: good for astronauts when coming back to earth from long "exposure " to microgravity. muscle distrofy
we'll the US did sign the Kyoto protocol , but as we see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol it has failed to ratify the damn thing, due to it being a rock in the evolution of it's economy. 'nuf said. The problem is that there are too many problems political,economical, sociological that develop when you start ratifying a protocol like that.