Slashdot Mirror


User: BoberFett

BoberFett's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,642
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,642

  1. Re:Privacy != anonymity on Google May Close Gmail Germany Over Privacy Law · · Score: 5, Funny

    I notice that you're using a pseudonym rather than posting under your full, legal name. What are you hiding?

  2. Re:What about use? on Court Ruling Limits Copyright Claims · · Score: 1

    Sure, if you have the resources of a large corporation with which to defend yourself from lawsuits.

  3. Re:Why "must" they? on Proposed Amendment Would Ban All DVD Copying · · Score: 1

    Patent law makes that difficult. The DVD format and anything required to decode it will be patented for quite a few more years.

  4. Re:DIY Kaleidescape Style System on Proposed Amendment Would Ban All DVD Copying · · Score: 1

    For price and ease of use, nothing beats a modded Xbox with XBMC. If you've already got the video sitting on a server, XBMC makes an excellent frontend.

  5. Re:fine -- Poster is full of it! on Proposed Amendment Would Ban All DVD Copying · · Score: 1

    How long? It's already been tried, don't you remember DIVX? Not the codec (DivX), the disc format. Circuit City tried to sell everyone a format that would only last for a few viewings, after that the content on the disc would be unreadable. We can see how well that did against DVD.

  6. Re:He's just widening his scope. on Lawrence Lessig to Leave Copyright Sphere · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Myself for one. I think lobbying is very destructive in general, but it's never quite as cut-and-dried as "buying off" people. First of all, even with all the loopholes, it's very difficult for one donor to give enough money to a member of congress to severely sway them. I mean, these people are usually start out being comfortably well-off, even with the frequent pay cuts you get when you move from the private sphere to the public one.

    Very few members of congress are going to let themselves be bought for a few thousand dollars. Just not worth it.
    They're not being bought for a few thousands dollars during their term in office. They're being given lucrative positions after they leave office. That's the real payout.
  7. Re:And who can weee thank for this? on US Can't Meet The "Grand Challenges" of Physics · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points. American liberals are quick to blame everybody but themselves for everything wrong with the US today. Maybe they think it will take the heat off their massive failures?

  8. Re:From his site on Student Blogger Loses Defamation Case · · Score: 0

    Flying a plane and removing a kidney are highly specialized skills that not everybody needs to know how to perform. We ALL live under the law constantly, it's a disgrace that those laws have been made so complex that the average citizen is unable to understand the laws which govern them.

    But continue on with your completely inaccurate analogies if it makes you feel better.

  9. Re:Obvious? on Location-Based Search Was Patented In 1999 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but did they do it on the internet?

  10. Re:Big deal. on More States Rebel Against Real ID Act · · Score: 1

    Create enough laws and everyone is a criminal. I'm willing to bet that you do have something to hide, you just haven't been investigated yet. When investigation becomes a simple matter of asking a database that has been tracking you your entire whole life, it's easy to investigate everybody. Do you still say you have nothing to hide?

  11. Re:I don't know what's worse on 'Dangers of the Internet' Resolution Passed By Senate · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I realize full well that there are people out there stupid enough to fall for this. What's disheartening is that all of our senators are in that group.

  12. Re:Who cares about Final Fantasy anymore? on Fallout 3, RE 5 in 2008, Final Fantasy 360 Never · · Score: 1

    Xbot? Are you 12 years old or do you just act that way?

  13. Re:Wrong. on Internet Tax Imminent? · · Score: 1

    I can't decide whether this is sarcasm or not. If not, you scare me.

  14. Re:Mindset Schmindset on Indecent Game Sales Now A Felony In New York · · Score: 1

    No shit, the word "British" is right there in the 2nd Amendment. Wait a sec...

  15. Re:Simple solution on New AACS Fix Hacked in a Day · · Score: 1

    And lose the backing of the entire computer industry? Not likely. When trying to launch a new media format, these companies need all they help they can get to foist the thing on the public. Telling huge swaths of the tech industry they're not needed doesn't help.

  16. Re:public shools on McCain on Net Neutrality, Copyright, Iraq · · Score: 1

    The important part is that everyone has the option of sending their children to those publicly funded schools. If someone makes the choice not to, that's wholly their decision. My daughter is home schooled, and sure it'd be nice to save some money on taxes, but I do recognize the education system as the worthwhile entity it is, despite the fact that my child doesn't use it.

  17. Re:What he didnt say... on McCain on Net Neutrality, Copyright, Iraq · · Score: 1

    *bzzzzzzt*

    Wrong. The roads are publicly funded, and everybody has the option of using them. Schools are publicly funded, and every citizen is allowed (nay required) to attend.

    Have you ever tried getting a permit to lay wiring for a new telecom company you wanted to start? Good luck with that. Telecom companies are given special access to things like property easements and construction permits. Not every guy who walks in off the street gets to use those subsidies.

    Roads and schools have nothing in common with corporate subsidies. Try again, skippy.

  18. Re:Ahhhh The Free Market on McCain on Net Neutrality, Copyright, Iraq · · Score: 1

    Wrong, wrong, wrong. Libertarians are minarchists, not anarchists. You start with a flawed premise, so your entire rant is incorrect. Libertarians believe that any government which wields too much power becomes worthy of controlling. Why do massive corporations buy influence in government? Because government wields the power to make them even richer. Government is every bit as guilty of creating the economic divide as capitalists are. Remember, the corporation is a government sponsored entity. Without it, the corporate veil wouldn't exist and the executives would actually have to put their livelihoods on the line when they make some of the awful decisions they make.

  19. Re:Reshuffle existing IPv4 space on IPv4 Unallocated Addresses Exhausted by 2010 · · Score: 1

    Because they're expensive to keep? If the feds want to tax the internet (http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05 /24/1516253) they could start with an IP address tax. Those companies would quickly give them up and take more realistic blocks.

  20. Re:Judges are ignorant, film at 11 on Michigan Man Charged for Using Free WiFi · · Score: 1

    Heh, figures. My business ideas are always a day late and a dollar short. :P

  21. Re:Judges are ignorant, film at 11 on Michigan Man Charged for Using Free WiFi · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a market begging for a product to me. An access point where you press a button and it spits out a receipt with a password on it. That password is then able to log in for a specified amount of time. I could imagine you'd be able to sell hundreds of thousands. Libraries, coffee shops, internet cafes, restaurants, hotels. Anywhere that patrons might want wifi but you don't want it freely available.

  22. Re:Legality on Microsoft Will Not Sue Over Linux Patents · · Score: 1

    I've never really been behind the anti-Microsoft movement that has in the past insisted that they're abusing their monopoly. The whole thing with IE being bundled in the OS? Seriously, it's a damn browser which is probably appropriately a part of an OS in this day and age.

    But these tactics against Linux now strike me as little more than a protection racket, and I wouldn't mind seeing MS bitchslapped for using it.

    "That's a nice little company you've got there. I'd hate to see anything happen to it if you, say for instance, used Linux. Pay us and we'll make sure that doesn't happen."

    Hit them with RICO charges for that one for all I care.

  23. Re:This is what DRM *is*... on Windows Media Center Restricts Cable TV · · Score: 1

    Disney actually started that if I recall. I don't know if it's the way they work anymore, but in the past they would make a large run of VHS copies of Snow White (or whatever their push was that summer) and when it was gone it was gone. If you wanted a copy you'd have to wait until the next time they brought it out of the closet.

  24. Re:TV? on Windows Media Center Restricts Cable TV · · Score: 1

    talking with your colleagues about that great show that was on yesterday...
    Oh no! You might actually have to *gasp* develop a real personality! There are few things more dull and uninspired than listening to other people yammer on about what they watched on TV last night.
  25. Re:I want a 5400 on The First Terabyte Hard Drive Reviewed · · Score: 1

    Not to mention they'd be use less power, require less cooling, and run quieter. I wish some company would bring out a line of drives intended for more archival type purposes. Maybe with things like Windows Home Server coming out and consumer servers becoming more common we'll see a company create a line of drives for this market.