Fire: "...the student no longer attends OPRF."
Call police: "...arrested at his Oak Park home"
Alternative could be a therapy/encounter session in a save environment where he and the people on this list are brought together to express their feelings about what he did, let him figure out why he did it and that there may be other possibilities for him to get what he actually needs.
Far from anything like that happening there....
You have to index and tweak what else have you to make it functional. It's a pain. The claim "greatly enhanced search features" is bull from a different reality.
search for "Windows 7 Search does not work with net" on that page and read on.
I've tried to get something similar to XP CTL-F, enter file name wildcard and transverse a network tree. W7 gives me all kinds of crap options - media files and what have you if you want to implement something similar. Clearly consumer oriented stuff.
My way on new installs is to get a virtual XP going and use it to search for files on networks - case closed. Consider it trolling or religious war, I don't care. If you are happy with what you use and have - go enjoy it!
MSoft has been left-handed in many ways - just look at updates - reboot happy upto the wazooo. My Linux does 1700+ download/updates without reboot so it's doable but apparently not of interest in other realities.
I have a 3200 x 1200 dual screen using multi-language new installs on different test environments (Job) and W7 Aero snap not just plain sucks, it interferes - bang! spreadsheet with one line snapped full screen and one has to fiddle to get it undone - I sure know how to turn it off and have done it x-times up to nausea in all kinds of languages. Every new install does it by default. I use virtual dimension with 20 desktops under W7 with multiple remote connections and Aero turned to nil. One runs XP to do network file searches by wildcards
- not a friend of this kind of eye candy at all...
If you love it, go to bed with it! Does not turn me on at all.
America (US) is special, you can't have a 2x4 up your ass in a metric system and the rest or the world will soon convert to the Imperial system anyway, so why bother?
4 - We might be good for a laugh, but that about it. Comedy tourism, perhaps?
Really? I'd say pity (probably already happening) - it's such a great planet, or was in the near future until the next species is "created by god in his own image".
1 - If any government comes into possession of unknown advanced technology gaining a (military/economic) advantage over other's, they will hide it, make it top secret, obscure it and take any measures to keep it that way.
2 - Considering the number of existing suns and planets of known galaxies, one can be 100 % sure that there are other advanced civilizations far older than the 0.4 - 1.5 M years since human-like species on this planet have used fire.
3 - Would a more advanced species even bother to deal with humans on this planet given the idiocy going on - hardly.
Presently offering this kind of equipment or have it under development? If so - info on any kind of "contributions" to politicians and amount of lobbying activity?
That would be big business, getting a box (manufactured overseas of cause) into every car..
And taxing the less consumptive vehicle more instead of rewarding sound like the way to go as well.
Since people like you would stop even research reactors on the concept being constructed, what's your point?
The anti-nuclear lobbyists have a lot to answer for since they seem perfectly happy to just make developing technology impossible in the idiotic belief that they can choke the industry out of existence without hazard.
Really, is that what's in your mind?
"pro-nuclear lobbyists" - About 5,080 results
"anti-nuclear lobbyists" - About 9,580 results --- Yess! we win!
"nuclear lobbyists" - About 12,700 results - oh shit - you win:
The premise "that it was the complete loss of power that disabled the cooling systems protecting the plant's reactors"
in the original post is incorrect.
Causes for failures on the JA plants were many.
Besides being under-designed for a 9 earthquake (7.? designed) and a too low tsunami wall to hold up the one occurred, there were failures in maintenance/upkeep/supervision.
Any plant can have those "failures" and the "uups, we did not think of that ever happening" is too costly and will happen again.
IMO - get rid of that stuff asap!
And yeah, let that pebble core get compromised and the graphite fuel balls in there start burning... PU-239 is not your friend.
"We aren't entirely sure that anybody other than those people who are directly involved really understand all of the nuances. Without monetizing what happens on the Internet, which is mostly file-sharing, it is going to be very hard for anybody (in music) to make a living."
(emphasis mine)
In essence, if it can be spun and makes money, it's ok. I wonder how many are already salivating on a cut from this cake.
First it will get paid out of corporate funds - reduces profit, taxes and, since profitability is a must - stockholders want their cut - the customers will come up for it. Size of company/revenue in relation to penalty is unknown, which would be interesting, is it even worth a scratch? Maybe lawyers are making more on it challenging the whole thing.
Assassination may be a possibility in some circles - it's actually not bad with patents - they expire after 20 years. Copyright 120 years or life of author + 70 years - mostly, that's a long time.. pretty complicated...
from: http://www.ivanhoffman.com/expiration.html: "Under the current law, if a work was first published in the United States on or before December 31, 1922, then it is likely to be in the public domain."
Hobbit apparently 1936
Lord of the Rings 1954/55
T. died 73 + 70 = 2043
Slashdot Mirror
To frame somebody with all this secrecy going on?
It takes a certain character (needing) to become a spook and same goes for the other side.....
Maybe it's just boredom, need for a purpose and stimulation?
Fire: "...the student no longer attends OPRF."
Call police: "...arrested at his Oak Park home"
Alternative could be a therapy/encounter session in a save environment where he and the people on this list are brought together to express their feelings about what he did, let him figure out why he did it and that there may be other possibilities for him to get what he actually needs.
Far from anything like that happening there....
You have to index and tweak what else have you to make it functional. It's a pain. The claim "greatly enhanced search features" is bull from a different reality.
look there:
http://helpdeskgeek.com/windows-7/windows-7-file-search-indexing-options/
search for "Windows 7 Search does not work with net" on that page and read on.
I've tried to get something similar to XP CTL-F, enter file name wildcard and transverse a network tree. W7 gives me all kinds of crap options - media files and what have you if you want to implement something similar. Clearly consumer oriented stuff.
My way on new installs is to get a virtual XP going and use it to search for files on networks - case closed.
Consider it trolling or religious war, I don't care.
If you are happy with what you use and have - go enjoy it!
MSoft has been left-handed in many ways - just look at updates - reboot happy upto the wazooo. My Linux does 1700+ download/updates without reboot so it's doable but apparently not of interest in other realities.
I have a 3200 x 1200 dual screen using multi-language new installs on different test environments (Job) and W7 Aero snap not just plain sucks, it interferes - bang! spreadsheet with one line snapped full screen and one has to fiddle to get it undone - I sure know how to turn it off and have done it x-times up to nausea in all kinds of languages. Every new install does it by default. I use virtual dimension with 20 desktops under W7 with multiple remote connections and Aero turned to nil. One runs XP to do network file searches by wildcards
- not a friend of this kind of eye candy at all...
If you love it, go to bed with it! Does not turn me on at all.
File search feature in W7 does not work well on network drives, if at all. Workaround is to use virtual XP under W7 to get some work done.
Then - how often does one undo the automatic (by default) snap/all screen window hog feature in W7? Ridiculous!
Not sure who has those ideas? Maybe trying to cut into Apple's pie.
Just bought a WXP SP2 for Eur 15.-
America (US) is special, you can't have a 2x4 up your ass in a metric system and the rest or the world will soon convert to the Imperial system anyway, so why bother?
... keep US defense contractors busy.
They should go fix bridges, roads and build high-speed rail instead of building cocky big-boy toys!
Not even considering the $$ and who lines whose pockets issue here.
really really boring....
Taking the thing apart is much more entertaining...
This joke makes my day: "General Public" - Pffffff!
Probably a high chance for a missnomer on that one - see who gets the money, for what purpose, result and real cost on that game.
But who cares about names and meaning these days...
take Microsoft serious, pay
.. and believe
4 - We might be good for a laugh, but that about it. Comedy tourism, perhaps?
Really? I'd say pity (probably already happening) - it's such a great planet, or was in the near future until the next species is "created by god in his own image".
1 - If any government comes into possession of unknown advanced technology gaining a (military/economic) advantage over other's, they will hide it, make it top secret, obscure it and take any measures to keep it that way.
2 - Considering the number of existing suns and planets of known galaxies, one can be 100 % sure that there are other advanced civilizations far older than the 0.4 - 1.5 M years since human-like species on this planet have used fire.
3 - Would a more advanced species even bother to deal with humans on this planet given the idiocy going on - hardly.
So, get a beer!
They have their khajuharo temple with different background
Presently offering this kind of equipment or have it under development? If so - info on any kind of "contributions" to politicians and amount of lobbying activity?
That would be big business, getting a box (manufactured overseas of cause) into every car..
And taxing the less consumptive vehicle more instead of rewarding sound like the way to go as well.
Since people like you would stop even research reactors on the concept being constructed, what's your point?
The anti-nuclear lobbyists have a lot to answer for since they seem perfectly happy to just make developing technology impossible in the idiotic belief that they can choke the industry out of existence without hazard.
Really, is that what's in your mind?
"pro-nuclear lobbyists" - About 5,080 results
"anti-nuclear lobbyists" - About 9,580 results --- Yess! we win!
"nuclear lobbyists" - About 12,700 results - oh shit - you win:
http://www.namavoice.org/index.php?ht=display/ContentDetails/i/4553081
Sure a lot of dough trying to make it right.
> You assume that's the only way to run a pebble-bed reactor.
No - but do you know of one running in production, smartypants?
Please note:
The premise "that it was the complete loss of power that disabled the cooling systems protecting the plant's reactors" in the original post is incorrect.
Causes for failures on the JA plants were many.
Besides being under-designed for a 9 earthquake (7.? designed) and a too low tsunami wall to hold up the one occurred, there were failures in maintenance/upkeep/supervision.
Any plant can have those "failures" and the "uups, we did not think of that ever happening" is too costly and will happen again. IMO - get rid of that stuff asap!
And yeah, let that pebble core get compromised and the graphite fuel balls in there start burning... PU-239 is not your friend.
Maybe that's why the planet is getting all upset - a 2m continent shift isn't peanuts.
I charge:
$ 0.3 for every cookie/day stored on my computer beyond the current session
$ 0.2 for every tracking beacon used
Next I will work on copyrighting my SS #, name, addresses, birthdays, phone # etc and sue for infringement.
The TV business model still lacks customers - I am trying to find companies paying me watching TV ads in essence giving me a cut on their ad revenue.
"very little" - what's that in $$'s?
From: http://www.windsorstar.com/entertainment/Canadian+songwriters+propose+music+sharing/4387146/story.html
"We aren't entirely sure that anybody other than those people who are directly involved really understand all of the nuances. Without monetizing what happens on the Internet, which is mostly file-sharing, it is going to be very hard for anybody (in music) to make a living."
(emphasis mine)
In essence, if it can be spun and makes money, it's ok. I wonder how many are already salivating on a cut from this cake.
$ 4.3 M - Oh, come on, get a perspective!
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Where are they? Fffft - gone!
First it will get paid out of corporate funds - reduces profit, taxes and, since profitability is a must - stockholders want their cut - the customers will come up for it.
Size of company/revenue in relation to penalty is unknown, which would be interesting, is it even worth a scratch?
Maybe lawyers are making more on it challenging the whole thing.
who will eventually pay for those fines?
Nothing but hot air puffing up some ego.
Assassination may be a possibility in some circles - it's actually not bad with patents - they expire after 20 years. Copyright 120 years or life of author + 70 years - mostly, that's a long time.. pretty complicated...
from: http://www.ivanhoffman.com/expiration.html: "Under the current law, if a work was first published in the United States on or before December 31, 1922, then it is likely to be in the public domain."
Hobbit apparently 1936
Lord of the Rings 1954/55
T. died 73 + 70 = 2043