Slashdot Mirror


The 'Three Ton' Hard Drive Destroyer

Barence writes "Last year, PC Pro welcomed a DIY-style hard-disk destroyer into its Labs to wreak havoc on some unsuspecting platters. Now the technology has moved on, with the Ideal 0101 — a device that pierces disks with between 2.5 and 3 tons of force. 'It's not the quick cut-and-shut process you'd assume it is,' says PC Pro's reviewer. 'Instead, the 0101 seems to enjoy its particular method of torture.The punch emerges from the side of the bay, slowing piercing its way through metal, silicon and glass, before retreating once the disk is destroyed.'" I attached a video clip.

206 comments

  1. Seagate? by halfEvilTech · · Score: 0

    did they commission this for all those samsung drives they are about to purchase?

    1. Re:Seagate? by thsths · · Score: 2

      Possible, it certainly is a lame device and an even lamer (?) article.

      The device is flawed, because as brutal as it is, it does very little to protect the data from being read again. You may need a laser to do it, but apart from whole it is still all there.

      And the article is just terribly pointless. Pressure is not measured in tons. Pressure actually has no role in erasing hard disks - 30 kN is no better the 1 kN, or even 1 N. You can drill a hole with less, if you like...

      Overwriting your hard disk once is still one of the best strategies, even if it is boring. If you need to be really sure that the data is gone, you have the choice of heat, a strong magnetic field, or pulverisation. Note how punching wholes is not an option.

    2. Re:Seagate? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      The device is flawed, because as brutal as it is, it does very little to protect the data from being read again.

      Yup. It's quicker but potentially less effective than a single pass of "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/disk-to-be-wiped". Writing zeros across the disk will wipe any disk made in the last 15 years or so, beyond all hope of recovery.

      No, you don't know a company that can recover it. No, the NSA don't have a big magic machine that can recover it.

    3. Re:Seagate? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      When the disk is non functional, degaussing works great on hard drives. Though you should not degauss a hard drive that works as it whipes the hard disk parameters from it and makes it completely unusable.

      http://www.datalinksales.com/degaussers/home.htm

      (quick Google, I have no tie to this company.)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    4. Re:Seagate? by Silvermistshadow · · Score: 1

      Yup. It's quicker but potentially less effective than a single pass of "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/disk-to-be-wiped". Writing zeros across the disk will wipe any disk made in the last 15 years or so, beyond all hope of recovery.

      No, you don't know a company that can recover it. No, the NSA don't have a big magic machine that can recover it.

      How does one do this on Windows? I don't run Linux, but I know enough to know that /dev/zero is one of Linux's special directories that does stuff. (/dev/null is another one, besides /dev/random) and thus just telling the disk to put itself in /dev/zero (or whatever that code means, I'm more of a level designer myself and can't read code unless everything is fairly plain) isn't going to work. I plan on doing this after recovering any data from a failing drive of my own. And then drilling a hole in it. And then having it be sent off to be recycled (ie melted down and made into something else)

      --
      Any comments made by the owner of this signature should be disregarded as irrelevant, uninformed, and idiotic.
    5. Re:Seagate? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Basically, anything that would write sectors full of zeros (or anything else, for that matter) to the drive, ignoring the file system.

      Recovering data from drives that are working correctly - ie., when you boot your PC, or fire up a browser, or anything else that loads data from the disk - is nothing short of miraculous these days. It doesn't take a lot to make it totally unreadable.

  2. recycling by walshy007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    anyone else manually dismantle the things and remove the magnets because they're decently strong?

    1. Re:recycling by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I use them as fridge magnets. I've even made a few clocks with the platters, it's a fun project to teach the kids that just because something is useless for its original purpose it doesn't mean you can't use it for something else.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:recycling by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      I've given the platters to my girl fiend as purse mirrors. I also keep one in my car for when people have their high beams on behind me. Not sure why, but the surface is a near perfect mirror. And since it's not really deformable (brittle, not elastic) the image is always near perfect. Minus the hole in the center.

      If you can toss them correctly they also fly rather well, requires you to snap the wrist.

      I just don't see how this destroys 'everything'. A small hole like than in only a portion of the disk will still leave quite a bit of data. I always thought the NSA 'approved' method required turning the hard drive into a small metallic dust.

    3. Re:recycling by Aboroth · · Score: 1

      The best thing is that when they check the time they are also getting an eyeful of porn.

    4. Re:recycling by vlm · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've given the platters to my girl fiend as purse mirrors. I also keep one in my car for when people have their high beams on behind me. Not sure why, but the surface is a near perfect mirror. And since it's not really deformable (brittle, not elastic) the image is always near perfect. Minus the hole in the center.

      If you can toss them correctly they also fly rather well, requires you to snap the wrist.

      I just don't see how this destroys 'everything'. A small hole like than in only a portion of the disk will still leave quite a bit of data.

      There is a certain cutoff year where most of the pre-whatever drives are aluminum platter and the post-whatever drives are glass platter. Everyone whom does what we do, eventually has the "shattering" experience of discovering their first glass platter hard drive. And being precision ground surfaces they can't be prestressed like car windows, they leave some very nasty sharp jagged chunks of glass. Keep the 1st aid kit handy...

      The large old aluminum ones (think 5.25 or bigger) also rang with a clang you cannot believe if dropped on a tile floor. Deafening, almost. Don't try with the glass platters.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:recycling by skids · · Score: 1

      Yes. I have a giant collection of jars full of various HD components. I have one of those giant plastic pretzel containers full of the heads. I can't fit any more in there, so I've been getting around to removing the bearings for later, and chucking the alloy, to make space. See! I threw something away! Please don't call the horder TV show people!

    6. Re:recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got a pair of monster magnets from an old SCSI drive.

    7. Re:recycling by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      The best thing is that when they check the time they are also getting an eyeful of porn.

      Brilliant. I'm saving that one for my son's wedding speech!

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    8. Re:recycling by paiute · · Score: 1

      anyone else manually dismantle the things and remove the magnets because they're decently strong?

      I took an old hard drive apart several years ago to get the magnets. Played with them a bit, then stuck them on a metallic surface in the garage and forgot about them. Sometime after, I was replacing a picture window. The frame was held in place by some large finish nails which had been sunk way below the surface of the wood and in places not that obvious. I went and found the old magnets. It turned out that if I let one rest on top of my finger and then ran the finger slowly down the frame, the magnet would stop and hang onto the wood over the head of the nail.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    9. Re:recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else just send them to the local incinerator, which according to EU regulations must sustain a temperature of 850C (> Curie temperature)?

    10. Re:recycling by DanielSmedegaardBuus · · Score: 1

      Purse mirror, eh? Right next to the credit card, eh? No problem with that extreme magnetism, eh?

      Or surely, your girl friend requires only cash?

    11. Re:recycling by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I always salvage the magnets. When I change transmission fluid on a car with an automatic I put a few in the pan. When I don't shoot the rest of the drive full of holes I have made wind chimes out of old platters. The best wind chimes are those have have platters of varying thickness.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    12. Re:recycling by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The HDD magnets are strong. But the platters aren't even weak magnets.

      --
    13. Re:recycling by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      complete car noob here, what do the magnets do in the pan that is beneficial?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    14. Re:recycling by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      a most excellent observation...kudos to you sir!

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    15. Re:recycling by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      complete car noob here, what do the magnets do in the pan that is beneficial?

      It collects small metallic fragments from the transmission - likewise, some folks will put magnets in their oil pan to collect small iron fragments from the engine.

      Of course, if it's non-magnetic (a la aluminum), it doesn't do as much good.

    16. Re:recycling by tracerbb · · Score: 1

      I bought an iPad 2 case that didn't come with a magnet to turn the iPad off/on... HD magnet works perfect! Even looks good on the black leather case!

    17. Re:recycling by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      Of course I do. One of my favorite applications is to attache the magnets to the oil filter on my car to act as a Cow Magnet for the engine. Any loose metal that happens to find it's way into the engine is going to stay right in the oil filter and get thrown out.

      Of course I'd rather not have loose metal in my engine, but if I do, I don't want it rattling around causing problems.

      They're also fun to just leave out for friends to play with. Many pinched fingers over the years..

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    18. Re:recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expected so much more mangling and destruction - how unthrilling :-(

    19. Re:recycling by Demolition · · Score: 1

      I've given the platters to my girl fiend as purse mirrors.

      Yeah, when I first started going out with my girl, she was just a mere fiend, too.
      But, after we got married, that's when she morphed into a Greater Demon.


      (just kidding, honey!)

    20. Re:recycling by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      The metal fragments in the fluid in the transmission on from either gear wear, or from clutch wear, yes automatic transmission have clutches. There usually are magnets factory installed in the pan, but are weaker than the ones in hard drives. As I have never owned a new vehicle every time when I first change transmission fluid on a vehicle the magnets are fully loaded with shavings. By tossing a few more stronger ones in there I figure it can't hurt as it increases the ability to remove the ferrous metal and really doesn't affect the fluid capacity. By keeping the shavings out of the fluid you prevent the transmission fluid filter from getting clogged and from shavings small enough to make it through the filter from circulating and making your transmission fluid like sand paper on the moving parts. Also when I replace a leaking oil pan gasket I toss some magnets in there as well for the same reasons.
      Most of the moving parts that have heavy stresses on them in vehicles are made of steel so this does help. Even vehicles with aluminum blocks have steel valves, cams, crank shafts, transmission gears, piston sleeves so there is a benefit of using magnets

      --
      Time to offend someone
    21. Re:recycling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha-ha! Moded!

  3. Kind of silly. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A drill press works faster and is a lot cheaper. granted it does not have bright green lights and a lot of over-engineering, but hey.

    Can they make it do some laser effects and add a smoke machine so it looks really cool?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Kind of silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just use a 45 automatic.

    2. Re:Kind of silly. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Bonus! that give the smoke effects as well as a LOT of personal satisfaction.
      And you can easily add lasers!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Kind of silly. by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "bullets cost money" -- The Magnificent Seven

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    4. Re:Kind of silly. by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      I prefer taking the cover off and gently applying an oxy-acetylene torch, warming the platters to between the curie temperature and melting point (to taste). Melting point is FAR more fun.

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    5. Re:Kind of silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get the smoke machine, you also need it to play "Final Countdown" when it's operating.

    6. Re:Kind of silly. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Arguably, if you really want satisfying over-engineering, an induction furnace would be the way to go: Just drop the drive into the intimidating coil, turn on the power, and watch all the metal components glow red and then slump into a molten mess of slag. Game over man. Game Over.

    7. Re:Kind of silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attach a video!!

    8. Re:Kind of silly. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      A drill press works faster and is a lot cheaper.

      I would feel safer simply wiping the drive; punching a hole in it leaves most of the platter surface area intact.

      But I suppose there's always option C, "both."

    9. Re:Kind of silly. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Too much unscrewing, though you could "flux cut" the stainless using your torch by holding some carbon steel wire or welding rod between the flame and the stainless. It's the way industrial scarfing torches work.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Kind of silly. by jeffeb3 · · Score: 1

      I use a hammer and nail...

    11. Re:Kind of silly. by skids · · Score: 1

      If you have an old electric coil hot-plate, melting them on the coil can make some pretty interesting artistic patterns for wind mobiles. I would not recommend trying it on your cooking stove, however -- you have to keep an eye on it and turn off the heat right away or you'll slag the coil.

    12. Re:Kind of silly. by mprinkey · · Score: 1
    13. Re:Kind of silly. by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      Or if you were keen on the "crush" idea, you can pick up a 6 ton shop press for less than $100, or go overboard with a 20 ton press for around $200. They're handy to have around if you do any significant auto repair jobs too.

    14. Re:Kind of silly. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Punch a hole in a glass platter and theres not going to be much left intact.

    15. Re:Kind of silly. by EdZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even cheaper, but not as fast, is the ATA SECURE ERASE command. Wipes your data even better than DD (because it erases 'bad' sectors from the G-list too), and is built into pretty much every HDD manufactured in the last 6-10 years.

      The myth about '32 erase cycles' and similar nonsense about reading data with an AFM is pure bollocks, and has been since the introduction of MR (and later GMR, CMR and TMR) head drives nearly 20 years ago (15 for non-IBM drives).

    16. Re:Kind of silly. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Even that's overkill.

      sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx

      Good luck recovering anything from that on a modern drive.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    17. Re:Kind of silly. by mlts · · Score: 1

      I am lazier -- because I use TC with smart card encryption, with keyfiles on an IronKey drive.

      Zeroing out the data on the drive just means unmounting the volumes, and formatting the smart card, or forcing the IronKey (only the Basic one can do this) to erase all the data and regenerate new keys. For safety, I do a zero pass, but it isn't really needed.

      For Windows, I use BitLocker To Go, and post Vista, the Format command in Windows zeroes out the encrypted key sectors so unless someone saved off the unencrypted volume key out of memory, the drive is effectively erased.

      Full disk encryption makes worrying about data stored on flash cells or HDD platters a non-issue if done right.

    18. Re:Kind of silly. by daid303 · · Score: 1

      Shredding a harddrive, the linux way: http://linux.die.net/man/1/shred (shred /dev/sdx)
      It's for the paranoid, that think after writing everything with zeros some data can be recovered (which I think is impossible)

    19. Re:Kind of silly. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      They also tend to fly in all sorts of interesting and unwanted directions.

      Bullets are not nearly orderly enough for this task.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    20. Re:Kind of silly. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Erased and encrypted (with a lost key) are not the same thing. A dedicated attacker could likely have a fun time with the latter, as there's potential for a fair bit of known-plaintext. ... of course, most of us are likely to encounter such an attacker. At work, maybe, but then we'd be doing wipe+destroy processes. At home, meh. I can't even give away old monitors, so Idoubt anyone'd end up with one of my drives.

    21. Re:Kind of silly. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1
      --
      Time to offend someone
    22. Re:Kind of silly. by mlts · · Score: 1

      If done right, encrypted with a lost key can pretty much mean the data is not accessible:

      1: A diffuser needs to be used. This prevents an attacker from seeing the contents of sector 8 are the same as sector 5. TrueCrypt uses XTS mode. BitLocker uses AES-CBC and Elephant. Without this, it is easy to find patterns in the encrypted data.

      2: A keyfile must be used. Passphrases can be brute-forced. A keyfile ensures that an attacker has to guess out of the whole keyspace.

      3: The drive must be completely encrypted, to prevent spillage. For example, if I have a VM in a TC file based partition, there might be chunks of the VM in the main Windows's swap file (although Windows 7 can automatically encrypt swap.)

      Of course, a zeroization is a good thing to do, but forgetting the keys will pretty much render the contents inaccessible to virtually everyone but intel agencies with big budgets and supercomputers measured by the acre.

    23. Re:Kind of silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nail Gun.

      1 in the controller and two in the platters makes them really really dead!

    24. Re:Kind of silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a DeWalt hammerdrill and a 1" titanium bit that does the same thing just as fast.

    25. Re:Kind of silly. by hldn · · Score: 1

      9mm FMJ: $0.19

      not exactly breaking the bank~

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    26. Re:Kind of silly. by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Data is considered recoverable for under 3 passes of random data. From what I read, the binary data on your harddrive is stored as an analog wave, so it is very possible to recover most, if not all, of the data if you just do a single pass of zeros.

      Your best bet is 3+ passes of random data.

      My last job as IT at my uni required a 5 pass NSA wipe of all working drives before leaving the uni, or physical destruction of them. All "dead" drives had to be destroyed since we couldn't wipe them properly. I still have a bunch of magnets at home. I don't use them on the fridge because they're too strong and they ruin the surface of the fridge.

    27. Re:Kind of silly. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      don't forget the sharks

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    28. Re:Kind of silly. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      That knowledge is out of date, for any hard drive made in the last decade (to make a very conservative estimate, from the '90s onward is probably more accurate), 1 pass is enough, and random data is no better than 0s or 1s. Check the latest procedures recommended by US NIST.

      Also here's a TL;DR friendly answer:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_erasure#Number_of_overwrites_needed

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    29. Re:Kind of silly. by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Pedant:

      Bullets don't just fly off in unwanted directions. If that were the case, they'd be terrible for what they are designed to do. Bullets fly in the direction you point the barrel.
      The fragments (frag) from the bullet striking an object and destroying itself is less likely to return in the direction the bullet was fired, but generally goes off in all kinds of directions with tremendous loss in velocity.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    30. Re:Kind of silly. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      You can buy a 3 ton press off amazon for about $100 us - free shipping even! Must supply own sharp penetrating object, however. I was shocked to see that the final hand powered device shown in the article (not the video) is essentially the 7 ton press my friend has in his garage for car bodywork/repair, and costs around $80 at harbor freight tools.
       
      I'm not sure you even need a sharp penetrating object; simply warping the case/platters out of straight should be sufficient to destroy the data in most cases. Poking a hole in the platter is sure to impress your boss, but it seems overkill once you've already warped the disk.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    31. Re:Kind of silly. by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      How amazingly useful!

      What are your rates for parties? I usually have a lot of trouble getting people to leave, and I'm pretty sure you can do the job in a flash.

    32. Re:Kind of silly. by RooftopActivity · · Score: 0

      I agree this is over engineered, and from the video it looks like the machine only pierced the disk once?

      SSI make a shredder which seems more fit for purpose, as it actually breaks the drives down to shrapnel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQYPCPB1g3o

    33. Re:Kind of silly. by Onuma · · Score: 1

      Some high velocity .22LR FMJ would be even more prime for the task. A good ol' 10/22 or such can definitely punch through a hdd with the right round...and you can shoot a whole LOT of them for the price of a .45 or 9mm!

      9mm for carry. .22 for fun :D

      --
      What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
    34. Re:Kind of silly. by Mods · · Score: 1

      I'm sure with that attitude you have likely already done that job yourself. Why would you need his/her help?

    35. Re:Kind of silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your ammo is giving off any real smoke? You're firing shit ammo and should be ashamed of yourself.

    36. Re:Kind of silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww, thats precious...trying to kick your parents out after you have a few wine coolers? I don't think you'll be able to convince GP that legos as legal tender....

  4. Just slag it, it's the only way to be sure by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

    After you recover the magnets of course.

  5. guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    usually i just take my hard drives to the cove and put some .223 through them.

  6. Force? by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    "disks with between 2.5 and 3 tons of force"

    "That’s enough power, according to Duplo, to theoretically lift a truck, so you can be sure it’ll put a rather large dent in the average hard disk."

    Now I'm rather confused. I'm pretty sure they mean pressure not force, since I honestly doubt that a 2.5 'ton' of force is needed to punch through a hard disk.

    Now when the 'truck lifting' part got mentioned it only made things worse.

    1. Re:Force? by TheRealSchnelk · · Score: 1

      Ton is a unit of force, fwiw. The tool is pushed with that much force, it exerts a pressure (in PSI for us Yanks) based on its contact area. The smaller the contact area, the higher the pressure.

    2. Re:Force? by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure they mean pressure not force, since I honestly doubt that a 2.5 'ton' of force is needed to punch through a hard disk

      No they almost certainly mean force. Shop presses are sold by force. 1000 psi hydraulic tubing, fittings, pump, and o-rings vs some diameter (area is what actually matters) ram equals X tons. The shop press manufacturer has no idea what shape die you'll install. If its a wedge, I guess the area is theoretically zero at the point and the pressure is infinite. More likely limited by the compression strength of the metal in the die.

      Here's a Harbor Freight Chinese 20 ton press, less than $300 delivered.

      http://www.harborfreight.com/20-ton-shop-press-32879.html

      Chinese presses used to be famous for shipping with cast iron plates instead of steel plates. People die or are horribly wounded when the cast iron inevitably shatters. So be careful and/or buy or make your own steel plates. Another thing to look out for is Chinese "1000 psi" fittings and hoses might not actually survive 1000 psi when brand new, much less after years of abuse. So buying a press 10 times bigger than you think you need is not all that bad of an idea, assuming you can afford it.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Force? by bgeezus · · Score: 1

      In what contexts are tons used to represent force? As far as I am aware, tons are traditionally used for mass. While tons have also been used as a unit of volume (e.g., for ships) and a unit of energy (e.g., for explosives), I am not aware of tons ever being used to represent force?

    4. Re:Force? by ettlz · · Score: 1

      I am not aware of tons ever being used to represent force?

      Well, in a system of units where g=1...

    5. Re:Force? by Flaggday · · Score: 1

      A ton is 2000 pounds.

      Pound is a unit of force. Weight is a force. It translates exactly to a unit of mass as long as gravity stays the same (i.e. we're on Earth).

      The metric system uses grams as a unit of mass, and pascals as a unit of force. If I go from Earth to Mars, my weight changes, but my mass stays the same.

      When talking about tons of displacement for ships, that's saying that the ship displaces X tons of water (muddling weight vs. mass in there too).

      When talking about explosives, tons is referring to the amount of energy equivalent to an explosion of X tons of TNT (again muddling weight vs. mass).

    6. Re:Force? by jittles · · Score: 1

      They are only used as a unit of energy for explosives in the sense that a 1-kiloton explosion is the equivalent of 1000 tons of dynamite.

    7. Re:Force? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A ton is a unit of mass, not of force. They're out by dimensions of area.

    8. Re:Force? by Myrv · · Score: 1

      pascals as a unit of force

      Pascals are a unit of pressure.

      Metric uses Newtons for force.

      1 N is the force required to accelerate 1 kg at 1m/s^2

      So on Earth (g ~= 9.8 m/s^2) 1 kg weighs 9.8 Newtons.

      In the Foot-pound-second system the unit of mass is a slug

    9. Re:Force? by Flaggday · · Score: 1

      Pascals, not Newtons, of course.

      The "slug" is a unit of mass, but I don't know of anywhere that it's used.

      I each of the examples ("tons of displacement, "tons of explosive energy"), the unit of force (pounds or tons) is being used as a stand in for mass with the implicit assumption that we're talking about the mass that relates to a given force in earth gravity.

  7. Thermite. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Thermite is cheap. Granted, a device capable of actually holding a melting hard drive might be more expensive, but I have to imagine that taking a trip to an appropriate location several times a year would be relatively cheap. It'd certainly be a lot more fun.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Thermite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you could try and sell the melted drives as abstract art...

    2. Re:Thermite. by dingo_kinznerhook · · Score: 1
      --
      "God does not play Minecraft with the world." - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Thermite. by Caradoc · · Score: 1

      Or a bucket of liquid nitrogen and a sledgehammer. Don't forget to wear safety goggles.

      --
      Specialization is for insects. - R.A.H.
    4. Re:Thermite. by Zeek40 · · Score: 1

      A small crucible built out of brick, cinder blocks or pavers works, and is cheap. If you use pavers, you can even flip them over and re-use them in your lawn.

    5. Re:Thermite. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Firebrick, while not necessarily on offer at your local hardware store, is not too difficult to come by. Failing(or supplementing) that, sand exposed to thermite won't necessarily be in mint condition; but sand is extremely cheap, and there is nothing stopping you from just using a slightly thicker layer, and you can't beat the convenience of something you can get in big bags from most hardware/garden supply stores or by the ton from landscaping/construction contractor suppliers.

      Just remember, though, Keep It Dry. Very little will ruin your day quite like molten iron being spattered into your delicate flesh by a steam flash..

    6. Re:Thermite. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Does it not get between the joints and/or destroy the mortar? Maybe use firebrick materials?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Thermite. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      http://www.ev4.org/thermite/
      3 hard drives we destroyed a few years ago...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    8. Re:Thermite. by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      Just remember, though, Keep It Dry. Very little will ruin your day quite like molten iron being spattered into your delicate flesh by a steam flash..

      Jeb? Is that you? I *knew* your nick sounded familiar.

  8. Window or Trap Door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dataserver is at the edge of a Japanese volcano. I prefer to just have it thrown out the garbage chute. The one connected to all the yellow trashcans there. Or fly it by #4 reactor.

  9. Doesn't really destroy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This hardly destroys the device. A simple puncture?

    We have been able to reconstruct 60% of harddisk data when a bullet was shot through it. This example follows a very similar pattern.

    Fun? Maybe. But a "Hard Drive Destroyer"? I'd rather play with thermite: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite

    1. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Really, you have? On a modern drive?

      Because modern drives have glass platters and the gunshot shatters them into millions of pieces.

      A drive from the 80's and early 90's? yes.

      A drive from the past few years? no.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, this was "back in" 2004.

    3. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Granted, this was "back in" 2004.

      Don't forget a lot of posters here weren't even born then.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit on that. A bullet will make a mess inside a drive, shattering the platters. At least post a link to more information if you are going to make such claims.

    5. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      .233 will often go through a drive without much deformation.

      Now a 9mm, .45, .44, or 12 gauge slug will devastate them

    6. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      The solution to a .223 not deforming the drive much is to put more holes in it, .223 is fairly cheep ammo. I do the same with 7.62x39 and 7.62x54R rounds. More interesting is using a lower power shotgun slug, .410 or 20 gauge, they wont go through the entire drive but will tend to tear the top cover off or send the drive flying off somewhere depending on which side the round entered. As far as glass platters go I just like smashing those with a hammer, it is very satisfying.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    7. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      If they're made of glass maybe the answer is to spin the drives up while bombarding them with a resonant frequency and watch them explode. More fun than shoving a spike through them.

    8. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by tagno25 · · Score: 1

      Smashing the aluminum platters with a sledge hammer or maul is a very good stress reliever.

    9. Re:Doesn't really destroy it. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Why stop at half-measures? M829 series, depleted uranium armor piercing fin stabilized discarding sabot-tracer - if you absolutely, positively need it destroyed!

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  10. I was expecting more than just a hole by Mouldy · · Score: 1

    This seems like a very expensive way to not destroy a hard drive.

    Forensics buffs could probably restore a lot of the data on a hard drive that's just had a hole put it in.

    Beating it senseless with a hammer & chisel will have a similar efficiency, but will be a lot cheaper.

    1. Re:I was expecting more than just a hole by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      RTFA. Is is economically not very feasable to recover the data. the hardware alone would set you back 10.000 dollar, before the first bit was recovered. You will find no commercial recovery service that will recover the data for you. search for MFM and you will find "It is unknown if this technology is in use. It certainly is not "commercially available and affordable" "

      Beside that, destroying the disk yourself is more reliable that outsourcing it. If the data is leaked it is your problem. The fact that the data destroying company might loose their reputation, does not give your company its reputation back. If you want to outsource this anyway, let them destry the archives on-site.

    2. Re:I was expecting more than just a hole by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Probably everything, even from the sectors that had the holes (assuming no significant demagnetisation due to friction). Electron microscopy and other techniques can go a loooong way.

      I'm not an expert btw.

    3. Re:I was expecting more than just a hole by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the real purpose of such a device(aside from the fact that white-collar environments, especially larger ones, often have a cultural distaste(at least during working hours) for solutions that involve just smashing stuff) is that it is probably "certified" to some or other standard, while just giving the janitor the night off and some beer money to take a sledgehammer to the junk drive box isn't, even if the degree of destruction is greater.

      While smaller, more informal, shops can probably do whatever they want, I can definitely imagine some suits who could drone on about "Devices containing Secure Customer Information(SCI) were certified sanitized per industry standard practices by a monitored on-sight disposal contractor" in their sleep; but would freak out at "That IT guy with the the beard and the muttering took them to the shooting range over the weekend. Didn't you know that the FCSA annual get-together was last weekend?"

  11. who builds something like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's so sinister yet so cute, makes me uncompletely uncalled for think of the big lables and their lawyers.

  12. Links... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1
    Nice video, but the links from the video were almost more amusing. In particular one was

    Why business intelligence matters in 2011

    Because apparently, business intelligence did not matter prior to 2011.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Links... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I'd be skeptical to, it implies that business intelligence exists in 2011.

  13. This is how we do it.. Shredder! by Pontiac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK folks.. this is how the government gets it done.
    An industrial metal shredder. Nothing left bigger then a dime.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yd_O7-rqcHc

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    1. Re:This is how we do it.. Shredder! by Cap'n.Brownbeard · · Score: 1

      There are clearly a lot of scraps left much bigger than a dime in that video.

    2. Re:This is how we do it.. Shredder! by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      lol, thats what they normally use on dead livestock

    3. Re:This is how we do it.. Shredder! by rssrss · · Score: 1

      Much closer to what you really need to do to make sure that that the pictures for which you could be indicted are really gone. Although, something like a plasma torch would be better.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    4. Re:This is how we do it.. Shredder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waste of money and time.

      Set the drive to all 0's and give it to a company and see if they can recover it. There is not 1 company out there, not even the NSA that can recover that.

      If you are feeling paranoid set it to random.

      None, it is not possible to do.

      There is no reason to shred a drive other than to recover the metals from it.

    5. Re:This is how we do it.. Shredder! by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      Set the drive to all 0's and give it to a company and see if they can recover it. There is not 1 company out there, not even the NSA that can recover that.

      You keep on believing that, sport.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    6. Re:This is how we do it.. Shredder! by bmo · · Score: 1

      >waste of money and time

      >money

      First off, nobody says you have to buy a shredder. There are services that have one where you can send your drives to (or they show up) and you pay for that service at that time. And they even do the recycling for you.

      >time

      5 or less seconds through a shredder or half an hour (or more) while a drive overwrites every silly bit on a drive...

      And you've got a pile of them to go through.

      No, you don't overwrite, you call the shredder service and shred the drives.

      --
      BMO

    7. Re:This is how we do it.. Shredder! by drdrgivemethenews · · Score: 1

      Typical government incompetence. A LOT of personal information records can fit on a dime-width single stripe of a disk.

      I advise my clients to reduce the disks to powder or liquid, if they're worried about government-level magnetic force microscopy and other forensic attacks.

  14. Alternative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could also put the platters in your $50 microwave oven for 15 seconds and get better erasure.

    1. Re:Alternative. by v1 · · Score: 1

      That substantial of a chunk of metal would make quick work of the magnetron in a microwave. There's a reason you don't put silverware in a microwave.

      You'd have to take them out of the hard drive at least, since the hard drive's enclosure is basically a faraday cage around them.

      May as well whack them with a hammer a few times at that point.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  15. Hey now! by lxs · · Score: 1

    That's no way to talk about my mother!

  16. Why is dd not sufficient? by tpotus · · Score: 1

    dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hd[x]

    1. Re:Why is dd not sufficient? by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      even if=/dev/zero should be enough, I don't believe the rumours of restoring data with AFMs and such. The magnetic pits on modern HDDs are too small to stable store more than one state (correct me if I'm wrong)

    2. Re:Why is dd not sufficient? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      How long does that take?
      Can someone interrupt the process?
      Can you trust DD?

      A drill takes less time, does not require a running computer that you trust, if it is interrupted in the short time, you'd know. DD can be stalled by bad blocks as it tries to write. A drill doesn't care.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    3. Re:Why is dd not sufficient? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I have seen no evidence that dd if=/dev/zero is not enough. Only apocryphal claims to the contrary.

      However, you can't verify just by looking that a disk has been entirely wiped, and drives are often discarded precisely because they don't work any more so they can't be wiped. Also, I think drives can re-map bad sectors so they are not visible to the OS and thus could not be wiped.

    4. Re:Why is dd not sufficient? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also you could theoretically install something like this in a working computer case, put a big red button labeled "invoke 5th amendment rights" and it runs a lot faster than waiting for DD to wipe it, when you absolutely need it wiped right now

    5. Re:Why is dd not sufficient? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Where I work (a defense plant) it is not unusual to dispose of disk drives. The ones we destroy have usually been pulled from copy machines. When a copy machine leaves a secure facility for any reason, the drive is shredded. Wiping with software isn't really an option because the disk would have to work, you have to have a machine that can interface it, you have to trust the person who does the wipe, which is falsifiable.

      So we use a purpose-built shredder. The one we use is pretty impressive, an "AMS-2000". I think it could shred the shredder in the article. This is the same kind of shredder that is probably in use by a half dozen competing document disintegration services in your area. It's exactly what they use at Iron Mountain for destroying disk drives and LTO tapes, which is why we chose it.

      As Donald Trump would say, "it's a wonderful product, it's my favorite hard disk shredder, and I love it."

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  17. i think we should put old disk drives on rockets by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    not to destroy them, but to send them out into space, in a random trajectory, like voyager 1. 300 centuries hence, our distant children, or aliens, can find them, decipher them, and find all about the wonders of cookies, porn spam, twitpics, and excel 2003, among other digital detritus of our lives

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  18. Higher More Scientific Overengineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This method lacks some seriously more convoluted math. I mean, practically pure mechanics are fine, but... Well

    A serious EMP "can-crusher", with caustic plasma torch "spikes" filling the (ceramic) chamber with molten magma in an instant. Now that would be technically and scientifically waaaaay more cool!

    And the half-melted paperweight would look decisevly wicked. Sort of like hans Solo in carbonite (that the name?). Except for a mouse, or something.

    If the containment were thick enough, a brisk liquid-nitrogen "pre-cooling" phase, would make things even mor spectatcular. Not t mention interesting.

    Oh well. Back to the usual dull chores.

  19. torch by codepunk · · Score: 2

    I use my trusty oxy-acetylene torch, it takes but a second to pierce the top cover. Once the top cover is breached the disks are vaporized almost immediately with no possible chance of recovery.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:torch by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      I have mod points today. I desperately wanted a mod option labeled "Sounds like fun!"

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  20. A single hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd have thought that would leave plenty of room for recovery of at least some data.

    Software shredding should be sufficient (multiple iterations of writing random data to the drive then wiping it again), and leaves the drive usable in the end.

    1. Re:A single hole? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      The platters warp as well, meaning that no head will travel over it.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:A single hole? by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      Oh so the expensive machine is not intended to prevent forensics from reading the contents of the disk then?

  21. Why does it matter how much force is used? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it makes it through the disk? I would much prefer a device that made several holes with whatever force was necessary versus one that makes one hole with as much force as possible.

  22. Nope, still aluminum by name_already_taken · · Score: 2

    Really, you have? On a modern drive?

    Because modern drives have glass platters and the gunshot shatters them into millions of pieces.

    A drive from the 80's and early 90's? yes.

    A drive from the past few years? no.

    I dismantle every drive that we are getting rid of, usually about five a year.

    So far, the only glass platters have been in laptop drives. The most recent 3.5" drive was from 2010, and had aluminum platters. The laptop drives seem to have had glass platters all the way back to the early 1990s.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Nope, still aluminum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What this guy said, desktop drives are still metal

    2. Re:Nope, still aluminum by hjf · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have disassembled lots of drives. 2,5, 8, 30, 80 gigs...sata or IDE, 3.5 or 5.25" (!!!) , ALL of them had metal platters.

      Never took apart a 2,5" - yet. But recently I dropped a 250GB Seagate. It fell flat on the floor. Plugged it back in and it worked - I'm not really sure a thin glass platter could whitstand that. And I'm not really a lucky guy.

    3. Re:Nope, still aluminum by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I recently took apart the 2.5 drive out of my nv9400 mac mini.

      That was a metal platter.

      Never knew they were so... shiny.

      See. They're even shiny on the inside!

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  23. Why does it matter how much force is used? by AlphaBit · · Score: 1

    If it makes it through the disk? I would much prefer a device that made several holes with whatever force was necessary versus one that makes one hole with as much force as possible.

  24. A single hole? by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    I didn't read the article, only saw the video, but the video shows the machine punching only one hole through the disk? That leaves all the other data intact. Or does the machine keep repeating this step for the whole area of the disk and did the video show only one of the punches?

    Anyway, why does the force even matter? If it punches only one hole. Whether that hole was made with one gram or one teraton of force, it's still just one hole...

  25. Re:i think we should put old disk drives on rocket by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Heh, I can see all the subpoenas and arrest warrants coming back at us from place more prudish than Saudi Arabia

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  26. This doesn't destroy data by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Only the data on the platter where it is pierced will be destroyed. I think that about 90% of bits is still readable on the platter, with proper equipment. I wouldn't trust my countries deepest secrets to this device.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:This doesn't destroy data by scorp1us · · Score: 2

      The margins between the heads and platter are extremely small. The platters will warp making the disk unusable.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:This doesn't destroy data by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Sure, the disk will be unreadable using the standard heads present in the drive (not to mention the drive controller board also has a hole through it)...
      But the *DATA* is still intact on the vast majority of the platter surface, where specialised equipment will be able to recover it quite easily.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  27. not impressed by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

    I expected to see the entire HDD crushed. Or maybe an array of spikes to thoroughly perforate the disk.

    A single spike? A single hole in the disk?

    I'd assume the controller and electronics are toast... But I bet that if you were sufficiently motivated you could mount those platters in a new box and recover a good chunk of data.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:not impressed by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      You will never be able to remount those disks.
      The only way to recover the data would be an electron microscope.
      Bit by bit.
      It would take tons of money and shitloads of time.
      It would be easier to kidnap a persons family and force them to give you the information you seek.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    2. Re:not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you would need to mount them.

      Your best bet would be to read the disk optically. Really hard to spin an unbalanced disk and read from it mechanically.

  28. Maybe for some models, but not all by name_already_taken · · Score: 2

    There is a certain cutoff year where most of the pre-whatever drives are aluminum platter and the post-whatever drives are glass platter.

    This does not seem to be true across all manufacturers. I dismantle all of our drives before disposal, and I've only come across glass platters in laptop drives (they seem to have been glass all the way back to the early 1990s, the earliest one I disassembled was from 1992 and had glass platters). All of the 3.5" drives have had aluminum platters, from the cheap 5400 RPM drives to 10000 RPM drives from servers.

    It's possible that some manufacturers use glass platters in certain model lines of drives, but there doesn't seem to be an industry-wide changeover to glass platters. I have a stack of aluminum platters here to prove it - the most recent from a drive manufactured in mid-2010.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Maybe for some models, but not all by vlm · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, the one that chopped my hand up (didn't quite need stitches) was a laptop drive from the early 00s. Also found glass platters in double-digit-gig high RPM (for their era, anyway) SCA SCSIs.

      For obvious reasons I don't try to pry stuck platters out anymore, so I don't know the ratios on modern drives.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Maybe for some models, but not all by skids · · Score: 1

      I've only found glass in the sub-3.5" class drives, more often than not. I've never shattered a platter, because unlike everyone else I know, I prefer to unscrew all the screws first and take them apart that way, rather than the prying with a screwdriver approach. It's more satisfying, like a puzzle, to figure out exactly what order to take things out for a given model.

    3. Re:Maybe for some models, but not all by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I have to destroy hard disks at work, I see glass platters in the higher capacity drives but it depends on the maker, just came across glass platters in a 20GB Deskstar from '03, but Seagates don't seem to have them till the 80-120GB family

    4. Re:Maybe for some models, but not all by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      IBM Desk Star drives of the 20-30 gig size were the first 3.5 inch drives I encountered that were glass.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Maybe for some models, but not all by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Glass is merely an alternative platter base material to aluminum. There are advantages to it (very good heat stability, for example) so it depends on the model. They've been around since the 90s.

      IBM DeskStars were probably the most common consumer drives with them, but the other manufacturers all had their own as well. These days it's probably even more a mess trying to figure out if a drive has glass or aluminum platters. I'm willing to bet even submodels of a particular model line vary - one submodel will have it, another submodel won't, etc.

      They exist in all formfactors now. I remember an old Screensavers TV epsiode where Patrick Norton was showing how to destroy a hard drive with a sledgehammer, and the first hit sprayed glass everywhere.

  29. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't any three ton hard drives any more, so I can't see the point in building something to destroy them.

  30. Re:i think we should put old disk drives on rocket by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

    excel 2003? i can only imagine the following response onboard the alien mothership:

    "Nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure"

    --
    People, what a bunch of bastards
  31. Back in the old days ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... the big aluminum platters were great stock for machining parts. Just grind the oxide off the surface and you've got a nice blank to make stuff.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  32. Don't be silly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't anthropomorphize the machines. It makes you look silly, and they hate it when you do that.

  33. re-allocated sectors by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hd[x]

    When a sector is about to go bad (not be reliable for writing), it's remapped to somewhere else on the disk. The original data is not wiped, and can be recovered with forensic readers.

    Some SATA devices support an ATA Secure Wipe command that is designed to erase the whole drive, including re-allocated sectors. But Seagate refuses to tell people which drives successfully implement ATA Secure Wipe. I've tried, they flatly refused, even as a member of their 'Business Partner' program.

    So, hard drives need to be physically destroyed instead of recycled or passed on to non-profits who could use them. Ubiquitous ATA Secure Wipe (and RAID-1) would do wonders for the environment and charity. I can only conclude that Seagate hates the planet. ;)

    Perhaps when China's restriction of rare earth elements hits them in the pocketbook they'll see the wisdom of recycling.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:re-allocated sectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many years ago, I wrote a popular piece of commercial software that would 'secure erase' harddisks by writing random data (generated by a modified Mersenne Twister) over the whole disk (including reallocated sectors, and areas locked out by the firmware) up to something like 200 times. I was never sure if the rumours about recovery of overwritten data were actually true though.

  34. Boring, by no-body · · Score: 2

    really really boring....

    Taking the thing apart is much more entertaining...

    1. Re:Boring, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not boring, as the piercing device does not rotate.

    2. Re:Boring, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted. I take apart a drive in less than 30 seconds.

  35. Re:i think we should put old disk drives on rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why send them into space? Why not just bury them somewhere? "Sending stuff into space" is very costly and is the optimal solution to very few problems.

  36. Re:Meh. We use a drill press by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Drill through the aluminum casting instead of the stainless plate. Less work, less bit wear.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  37. Re:i think we should put old disk drives on rocket by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the internet

    1. where someone can be guaranteed to post a mindlessly negative and/ or cynical response to your comment

    2. someone else can read into what you say with the most radical assumptions you never even remotely alluded to, and respond with an angry tirade as if you had said something totally different

    3. someone else can take the most throwaway ridiculous joke... and consider it with the utmost seriousness

    http://www.google.com/search?q=internet+serious+business

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  38. DBAN? Gauss Pads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, has nobody considered Daren's Boot and Nuke? It's the same level as specified by military intelligence. And what about putting the hard drive on a Gauss pad for 30 minutes. I seem to remember those thoroughly "fixing" dirty data on a drive.

  39. I use a drill press by kannibul · · Score: 1

    I use a drill press, works wonderfully...if it's a metal platter, it gets a 1/2" hole through it...or two...or three...depending on the level of assured destruction the HDD needs to keep the data secure. The metal bits left over inside the casing are icing on the cake - a few dozen shakes with that and you're pretty much guaranteed that the data will be unrecoverable...or so much more of a pain in the rear to handle, that it'd just not be feasible at any cost. If it's glass, it shatters from the pressure of the drill bit, problem solved.

  40. Why make it so hard? by crf00 · · Score: 1

    Can't we just blend it? Surely we all know everything can blend!

  41. Philosophycal question here by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    Is public geek masturbation (which is essentially what this story is) indecent or just a waste if our time?

    Discuss ...

    1. Re:Philosophycal question here by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      As if it can't be both...

  42. The video is stupid by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Not even a shot of the drive after the crush. It gets withdrawn out the back of the crusher, no idea if it actually did anything butcrack the PCB. Lame.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  43. Estwing rock pick for $33 by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Forget the chisel, get an Estwing rock pick. These suckers can rain destruction upon almost any man made or natural object. Depending on how violent you are feeling, you can punch a dozen holes in something in seconds. Then flip it over and smash it flat.

    Mine has been hammering rock, concrete, and metal for over 30 years and works as well as the day I got it. My great-grandkids will be beating the crap out of stuff with it long after I'm dead.

    http://www.amazon.com/Estwing-E3-22P-22-Ounce-Rock-Pick/dp/B0002OVCMO/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1303226325&sr=8-2

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  44. lol by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    That didn't destroy much. Someone with the correct skills and hardware could easily read that disk. Throw the damned thing in a smelter...

  45. The Fun Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a Ruger Super Redhawk .454 Casull to destroy drives. Sometimes we have a range day and boxes of drives to get rid of and it's BYOG (Bring Your Own Gun). We've had muzzle loaders, full auto Uzi's, Barret .50's, you name it. .22 race guns don't do a very good job though, so they are banned from drive destroying day.

  46. Poor method by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Won't piercing a hole in a hard drive just render data around the area of the hole difficult to read?
    I imagine that data in other areas of the platter will be unaffected, and subject to recovery by anyone with the appropriate tools/equipment to to do....

    Personally, i've always destroyed old hard drives using thermite which ensures that the platters are totally melted down to form an alloy with the drive casing and the molten iron create by the thermite reaction.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  47. cool enough, but by Combatso · · Score: 1

    why not just use a standard press brake to chop em in half?

  48. How I Do In Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if it's okay to do this or not, but I just wrote an article about how to make sure all of your data has been totally erased. Within a few hours of posting it and linking to it on Twitter I saw this article come up on Slashdot's Twitter feed. So I'm going to link to my article here. Thanks.

    Dennis Edmondson
    Computing Concepts LLC
    http://www.computingconceptsllc.com/4-ways-data-gone

  49. I just use a drill with a titanium bit by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Takes about as long, costs tons less.

    And I can put MULTIPLE holes if I'm really paranoid!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  50. Gross overengineering by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    Physical force is certainly entertaining, but it's a waste of effort. If you want to destroy any magnetic recording medium, all you have to do is heat it past its Curie point. In the case of hard drives, a decently hot fire will do nicely. A bunch of waste paper and cardboard in a steel drum will burn more than hot enough. If you're still bent on brute force, disassemble the drive and use sandpaper on the platter surfaces. Dropping them into hydrochloric acid will also do the trick -- the hardware store grade they call muriatic acid is good enough -- though you'll have more to clean up that way. Punching a few holes in the case and dropping it into a bucket of bleach will probably work as well, as will any strong oxidizer.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the FBI and the NSA are amused at the amount of paranoia they've been able to generate in this area.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Gross overengineering by bitslinger_42 · · Score: 1

      Fire, of various forms, might do the trick for individuals, but when trying to do something officially for a company, employee and facilities safety can be seen as an issue. An enclosed compartment that won't let you put your hand in until after the dangerous operation is done is preferable to random employees starting fires in their waste baskets :-)

  51. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the most boring story every submitted to Slashdot. Slow news day I guess.

  52. Just buy a sledge and a punch! by cruff · · Score: 1

    Looks like some one could sell a safety glasses, sledge and punch kit for half the cost of that machine and a person with reasonable dexterity and strength could do just as good a job, if not better. Heck, you could probably even throw in some kind of jig to hold the parts in proper alignment and keep from accidentally destroying a hand in the process.

  53. sledgehammer by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    nuff said

  54. Target practice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing beats taking a box of hard drives out to the range and popping them at 100 yards.

  55. What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they spent god knows how much money on a machine to punch a hole in a hard drive? What a waste.

    They could have blanked the drive or overwrote it with another app or something and then use that drive instead of just wasting it. Only in america would we say "Yeah lets make something to destroy perfectly good products for amusement! Yeah other countries dont have enough food or clean water but were america, we destroy valuable stuff when we get bored and throw away half our food when were full, we worship celebrities because they have more money than us and were all hyporites".

  56. Magnets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree with you on this one, the only good thing to come out of a crashed HDD are the magnets. I use them as key holders on the fridge/windows/under the car.

  57. Re:Meh. We use a drill press by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

    Thanks. I just hand them to the shop guy and he does it. But I'll pass it along.

  58. Sandblasters work well too! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Back in the 80s I ran a Vax with the 14" RM05 removable disks. My successor at the job got to decommission the disks, which she did by taking them to the machine shop in the building's basement and having them sandblasted. Most sysadmins in those days had one or two RM05 platters on their wall scratched up by a head crash; hers was down to the bare metal.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  59. if this were at my office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it would have a sign that said "automatic backup machine - insert drive here"

  60. My 22 ton platter deformation device. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already had a hydraulic device that can be used for disks; it's called a log splitter and it is 22 tons.

    Lack of adequate platter deformation is not a problem with my machine.
    : )

  61. Best way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thermite

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-ckechIqW0

  62. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is full of pedophiles or what?
    Why do you need to destroy your HD?

  63. RAID - Reflective Array of Incapacitated Disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take 'em apart and use the platters to make RAIDs - Reflective Array of Incapacitated Disks. Great rear-view mirrors for the cube.

    RAID-3 is three platters in a triangle, RAID-7 is one in the center and 6 around it. I have a RAID-13 each side of my monitors....

  64. Ameri-shred by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    I laugh when I hear about the "DOD" wipe protocol, because what we actually do here is feed drives to the Ameri-Shred. It's fun.

    http://www.ameri-shred.com/Hard_Drive_Shredder.html

    Most drives we destroy come from decommissioned copy machines. I never knew that copy machines had disk drives before this.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  65. Will it blend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the question.

  66. Encryption by Ectospheno · · Score: 1

    While it isn't a solution for all of the reasons people destroy hard drives at their end of life, full disk encryption solves all the ones I care about. It is easy to do in Windows or Linux. When you are done with the drive just throw it away. Even handles the "too broken to wipe" case.

    The adversaries it doesn't handle are the ones who will just torture the information out of you anyway.

  67. dd is cheapest, just time spent by mac1235 · · Score: 1

    dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/sda

  68. Why is this thought of as so hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't you just put the thing in your oven for 1 hr at 350F. Wouldn't that take care of it?

  69. Re:i think we should put old disk drives on rocket by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    probably accuse us of trying to spread some deadly digital virus around the universe...

    "Captain we have found the source of the material"
    "Prep the Destructo Ray, and make me some tea!"

  70. Magnets by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Last place I worked simply did a 0 wipe.
    If a drive was too dead to wipe, we just used an electromagnet over it.
    Dunno what it's real purpose was, but basically, plug it in, hit the button, get a powerful, undulating, pulsating, magnetic field.
    Pass it over the drive a few times and toss it into the box.

    Currently, we just toss the drives into boxes marked "...eventually".

  71. Destroyed by GregC63 · · Score: 1

    Hell, our document shredding vendor destroys all my dead drives. I take them out to the truck, set them in one of the bins, and stick around until it is dumped. They even have a camera in the conveyor so I can watch as the drives meet their demise. Quite fun and therapeutic to see them hit the grinder!! Small pieces too, not just a hole in the platter!

  72. Why go high-tech, thermite is cheaper!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not go low-tech and completely, absolutely 100% effective. In order to destroy the data effectively every time, you should melt the drive. What could be cheaper than thermite?

    Fe2O3 + 2Al 2Fe + Al2O3

    All you need to ignite it is a sparkler from the fireworks store (I don't think there are any states where sparklers are illegal, just load up at the 4th of July). Make a stoichiometric (if you don't understand stoichiometry and how to make the proper mixture for this then you dropped out of high school, or did not pay attention) mixture of powdered iron III oxide and powdered Aluminum. Remove all circuit boards (they contain toxic stuff that you don't want to burn), and everything else except for the platters and one side of the steel casing. Fill the steel casing with the thermite mixture. Cover the platters with thermite mixture as well. Cut the little metal stick off the end of the sparkler that is used as the handle. Jam one end of the sparker into the thermite. Light the other end. Move way way back. When its over, you have a pool of metal in the casing, or it melted the casing too. Either way, your data is gone.

    This is extremely cheap:
    iron iii oxide is ~$500 per metric ton
    aluminum powder is ~$4000 per metric ton
    sparklers ~$1 for 6

    Why would you want to use a more expensive, less effective method than thermite?

  73. our approach by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    We used to keep drives for the first days of Spring and take them outside and hit them with a sledge. But that's too likely to result in injury, particularly with the glass in drives these days.

    So now, we keep them in a shipping box until the first days of Spring. Then we take them out and shoot them. A .45 will totally destroy the platter if shot from the top; a .30 caliber rifle round will mostly punch through but effectively destroy the platter. Best of all is a shotgun slug, which has the tenacity to punch all the way through, every time. 00 buckshot from a 3" magnum shell is pretty fun, too. (Wear eye protection and stand at a distance!)

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  74. I used to do this. by Reeses · · Score: 1

    With a hammer. $6 and I got vent some job frustration at the same time.

    I can buy a lot of hammers for 2000 euro.

    Or one hammer, and some other cool tech toys.

    --
    Reeses
  75. Easiest way - harness ocean chlorides by altgeek · · Score: 1

    1) Hit the hard drive with a hammer to open up the seams a bit.
    2) Place hard drive into a bucket of sea water.
    3) Watch the bits oxidize away over a few days.

    As a boat owner, I am a first hand witness to how corrosive the sea is to ferrous metals. The thin layer of information on a platter doesn't stand a chance.

  76. How lame by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    You want to shred entire HDDs? Go ask the engineers over at SSI to build you one.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQYPCPB1g3o

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  77. Kinetic action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    30-06 does this quicker, cheaper, and is a lot more fun.

  78. Re:i think we should put old disk drives on rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When what I post turns out to be stupid I also pretend it was on purpose. That way I look great no matter what I say!