More or less. Add to this that is dangerous trying to get a girl/interact with one. No kidding! Examples of outcomes:
a) the girl have a neanderthal boyfriend;
b) the girl is a criminal;
c) the girl is literally lunatic (to the point of be dangerous);
d) the girl is ok, but their parents wants you - for god knows what reason - dead;
e) the girl is a asshole, and for his fun turn you into a "social criminal" for anyone;
f) the girl thinks you is a "criminal" because you try to speak to she and you do not have a Rolex or BMW;
Not enought? Think you are like me and are unable to "detect" who is the "good girl", who is the "asshole" and who will at least accept that you get close enough to talk. Still a catch-22?
Sir, a big thanks for you. You summed up what I wanted to say in a much simpler way to those who have trouble reading what I try to write (my native language is more complex than English, so is difficult to correctly translate ideas). Exactly, I tried to understand women. I concluded that I am incapable to do this, and to no fault with respect for them so I decided to keep them away. And yes, they are insane, incomprehensible, unpredictable, just pick your favorite version of the meaning.
However, I've made an observation over the years that for some adult people, there is a dysfunctional aversion to generosity that is essentially segregationist (e.g., some men might help another man move, or a woman might take another woman to lunch, but neither would consider doing that for the opposite sex as they think that they are being taken advantage of). Basically, I correlated that type of gender segregation is simply a leading indicator of not being a grown-up.
Reasonable theory, but have a flaw. Using myself as example, I do not avoid to be generous with women for being "immature". I avoid being generous with them because the very FIRST thing that most of them think when receive my generosity is that I can only be a "dangerous maniac only interested in taking advantage of her and do the most damage". How to deal with that, hum? And I'm not "imagining" this, is how they react that makes clear what they think of my attempt to be generous or polite.
You have not understood what I meant. You can have an very good, comfortable average life. The problem is that most women will not accept you even talk to them because they want only the "CEO" guy. And yes, here if you do not like to behave like a Caveman, the others decide that you must be gay.
Hum... I think you is a feminist, and if this is true, as in other fanaticism there is no way I can argue with you. You win, I are a wild "macho" man!:-) I will get my tomahawk and go home to do some smashup, uga uga!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, I tried this one too... Just a big waste of my time. Lots, I mean lots, of average woman searching for some fool to feed him (bad womans carring children resulted from bad decisions with good looking but shitty man), or womans searching for a rich, "adonis" man.
GASP! A... actual, real, female geek? Just one minute please, running my reality check here, I may really just dreaming about be here writting on./
Okay, now a detailed explanation about my opinion above:
1) I are not, in any means, the "default guy". And this is like a "social death sentence" on my city. I are not rich, not powerfull, not beaultiful. ergo, I are a "outcast" for the average woman;
2) I tried the "social game", I really would like to have friends and girlfriend and in a good way (no "macho" man). But, soon I figured that either you become this despicable "macho" man or nobody will want to know about me. And, I preffer to do not be that;
3) The average woman, trust me, is know to says "A" but actually want "B", and maybe does "C". Of course not all are like that, but so far I have not found one out of this pattern, and I searched a lot;
4) Finally, I REALLY do NOT like confusions. If a woman says "no" I'm leaving, even though she was actually saying the opposite (who said that the "mating ritual" is simple?). Because I do not want to pass in any way by the hassle of having to deal with an enraged woman.
In short? I just weighed all variables obtained over time and came to the conclusion that in the end is not worth it.
It would be great if the problem was just that... No my friend, I can say - with all certainty - that I am one of the most respectful people you could ever meet. The problem is that this is not what they want, I do not wrote "is too complicated" for nothing. And, I do not claim to be "superior". I just wrote that, in my case, I just gave up after concluding that women are insane and this do not makes me "superior" to others, just different.
I might add that our society demands too much. Either you are a wealthy CEO who owns mansions and luxury cars or you are a "nothing", there is no middle ground. Society demands of the boys that they needs to be "macho", aggressive, attacking any woman that appears in front of them, and if they do not do all of this then they will be "little girls". I can not argue against those who decide to simply get away from all this...
The problem with "common sense" (or even better, social common sense) is that for an autistic (or asperger like me) that needs to be taught. And nobody realizes it because everyone automagically all born knowing it (because they are not autistic). Teach to your child social common sense he will learn, do not expect him to know alone.
The "mating ritual" is too complicated. Social relations too, especially when others are actually trying to eradicate you (you are mere a rival for then in the "get power and females" game). I, as example, have a job and my own house. But I do not have the slightest interest in socializing when seems to be no one worthwhile to attempt interact, and the actual females are too batshit-crazys to aproach.
Every time my favorite distro have a significant update (eg: version 5 to version 6). And by necessity, since trying to upgrade only the packages invariably results in a disaster area.
I think you misunderstand me. If you do not have the middle man, then you have no spread to be paid. Deal directly with the buyer/seller, not with intermediaries.
I know, it also depends on what kind of shareholder we are talking about. Actually most of then just want maximum profits (extremely short and limited vision), but some people still wants to really be "partner" of the company. At at the bottom, the problem is the stock market became a casino, and this move away those who think in long term.
Is good. HFT distorts the purpose of a stock exchange, the idea of having shares in a company to help it to capitalize, make it succeed and you earn a share of the profits in return. A company needs partners (the shareholders), not parasites.
I think you misunderstand my point. The problem is when someone insists that I should use Project "X" just because it's free, without worrying if the project is able or not to do what needs to be done. Using a car analogy(tm), It's like getting for free a car like this, when what I need to work was a BMW.
Slashdot Mirror
+1 for you, sir. Fucking true.
Who, in hell, modded this -1?
More or less. Add to this that is dangerous trying to get a girl/interact with one. No kidding! Examples of outcomes:
a) the girl have a neanderthal boyfriend;
b) the girl is a criminal;
c) the girl is literally lunatic (to the point of be dangerous);
d) the girl is ok, but their parents wants you - for god knows what reason - dead;
e) the girl is a asshole, and for his fun turn you into a "social criminal" for anyone;
f) the girl thinks you is a "criminal" because you try to speak to she and you do not have a Rolex or BMW;
Not enought? Think you are like me and are unable to "detect" who is the "good girl", who is the "asshole" and who will at least accept that you get close enough to talk. Still a catch-22?
Sir, a big thanks for you. You summed up what I wanted to say in a much simpler way to those who have trouble reading what I try to write (my native language is more complex than English, so is difficult to correctly translate ideas). Exactly, I tried to understand women. I concluded that I am incapable to do this, and to no fault with respect for them so I decided to keep them away. And yes, they are insane, incomprehensible, unpredictable, just pick your favorite version of the meaning.
However, I've made an observation over the years that for some adult people, there is a dysfunctional aversion to generosity that is essentially segregationist (e.g., some men might help another man move, or a woman might take another woman to lunch, but neither would consider doing that for the opposite sex as they think that they are being taken advantage of). Basically, I correlated that type of gender segregation is simply a leading indicator of not being a grown-up.
Reasonable theory, but have a flaw. Using myself as example, I do not avoid to be generous with women for being "immature". I avoid being generous with them because the very FIRST thing that most of them think when receive my generosity is that I can only be a "dangerous maniac only interested in taking advantage of her and do the most damage". How to deal with that, hum? And I'm not "imagining" this, is how they react that makes clear what they think of my attempt to be generous or polite.
You have not understood what I meant. You can have an very good, comfortable average life. The problem is that most women will not accept you even talk to them because they want only the "CEO" guy. And yes, here if you do not like to behave like a Caveman, the others decide that you must be gay.
Hum... I think you is a feminist, and if this is true, as in other fanaticism there is no way I can argue with you. You win, I are a wild "macho" man! :-) I will get my tomahawk and go home to do some smashup, uga uga!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, I tried this one too... Just a big waste of my time. Lots, I mean lots, of average woman searching for some fool to feed him (bad womans carring children resulted from bad decisions with good looking but shitty man), or womans searching for a rich, "adonis" man.
GASP! A... actual, real, female geek? Just one minute please, running my reality check here, I may really just dreaming about be here writting on ./
Okay, now a detailed explanation about my opinion above:
1) I are not, in any means, the "default guy". And this is like a "social death sentence" on my city. I are not rich, not powerfull, not beaultiful. ergo, I are a "outcast" for the average woman;
2) I tried the "social game", I really would like to have friends and girlfriend and in a good way (no "macho" man). But, soon I figured that either you become this despicable "macho" man or nobody will want to know about me. And, I preffer to do not be that;
3) The average woman, trust me, is know to says "A" but actually want "B", and maybe does "C". Of course not all are like that, but so far I have not found one out of this pattern, and I searched a lot;
4) Finally, I REALLY do NOT like confusions. If a woman says "no" I'm leaving, even though she was actually saying the opposite (who said that the "mating ritual" is simple?). Because I do not want to pass in any way by the hassle of having to deal with an enraged woman.
In short? I just weighed all variables obtained over time and came to the conclusion that in the end is not worth it.
It would be great if the problem was just that... No my friend, I can say - with all certainty - that I am one of the most respectful people you could ever meet. The problem is that this is not what they want, I do not wrote "is too complicated" for nothing. And, I do not claim to be "superior". I just wrote that, in my case, I just gave up after concluding that women are insane and this do not makes me "superior" to others, just different.
I might add that our society demands too much. Either you are a wealthy CEO who owns mansions and luxury cars or you are a "nothing", there is no middle ground. Society demands of the boys that they needs to be "macho", aggressive, attacking any woman that appears in front of them, and if they do not do all of this then they will be "little girls". I can not argue against those who decide to simply get away from all this...
Exactly. If you are not rich and / or do not looks like a walking closet (strong/agressive), you're automatically a undesirable.
The problem with "common sense" (or even better, social common sense) is that for an autistic (or asperger like me) that needs to be taught. And nobody realizes it because everyone automagically all born knowing it (because they are not autistic). Teach to your child social common sense he will learn, do not expect him to know alone.
The "mating ritual" is too complicated. Social relations too, especially when others are actually trying to eradicate you (you are mere a rival for then in the "get power and females" game). I, as example, have a job and my own house. But I do not have the slightest interest in socializing when seems to be no one worthwhile to attempt interact, and the actual females are too batshit-crazys to aproach.
+10 Insightful for you, sir.
"Free market" is for big corps. For you and me, is feudalism 2.0
You have the right to consume. That's still real.
If you have money.
Do not forget the chainsaw :-)
We can nuke then from orbit? Please?
Every time my favorite distro have a significant update (eg: version 5 to version 6). And by necessity, since trying to upgrade only the packages invariably results in a disaster area.
I think you misunderstand me. If you do not have the middle man, then you have no spread to be paid. Deal directly with the buyer/seller, not with intermediaries.
I have a better idea for you: Cut the middle man. I do not need middle mans between me and my buyers/sellers.
I know, it also depends on what kind of shareholder we are talking about. Actually most of then just want maximum profits (extremely short and limited vision), but some people still wants to really be "partner" of the company. At at the bottom, the problem is the stock market became a casino, and this move away those who think in long term.
Is good. HFT distorts the purpose of a stock exchange, the idea of having shares in a company to help it to capitalize, make it succeed and you earn a share of the profits in return. A company needs partners (the shareholders), not parasites.
I think you misunderstand my point. The problem is when someone insists that I should use Project "X" just because it's free, without worrying if the project is able or not to do what needs to be done. Using a car analogy(tm), It's like getting for free a car like this, when what I need to work was a BMW.