No, this is the normal behaviour for a Linux dual screen setup. I have a dual screen system with gnome and this works with zero config. You can even get the benefits of having a second task bar by simply adding one to the second screen and by default each taskbar now only shows the programs on its screen.
What is wanted is a separate workspace for each screen so each screen has a group of windows on it which can be independently changed. So currently if you change workspace both screens change because they are just one workspace. This is also the way that the powertoy provided by Microsoft does this.
So Linux does by default what Windows can do by installing an additional program plus using a more complicated setup Linux can handle independent workspace switching however with a caveat of not being able to drag windows between monitors. The question asks if the second is possible with windows able to be dragged between desktops.
Maybe my first comment was slightly insulting, so far as a factual statement can be an insult. As some friendly advice, next time someone mentions you may not have understood something perhaps you should try to actually understand it before making more incorrect statements.
No you are missing the point. The man in the middle can modify stuff going through so they just change the page itself rather than trying to use fancy XSS attacks.
Maybe you will get modded down for not knowing what you are talking about instead. What is being asked involves having a separate workspace on each screen. Windows does not have workspaces hence the functionality is not possible in windows. The question actually described two ways fo having a dual screen setup in linux one of which is identical to the way Windows does it. If you don't understand something, read about it first.
What slant does the BBC have? I have never noticed any particularly strong slant in general. Wikipedia says that some people (mainly right wing) accuse the BBC of being left wing whereas others (mainly left wing) accuse BBC of being too right wing. It has no obvious external force biasing it.
Try getting a tablet PC. You can get some which have a keyboard as well so you just flip the screen over and turn it into a tablet. Best of both worlds except it is a bit thicker and heavier. They are used a bit here at university because you can easily write notes on them with a stylus.
Of course at the time that was a perfectly sensible comment. Apple actually changed their iPod so now you can use it with usb, iTunes is available on Windows and you can get an iPod for significantly less than $400.
I have a great idea. How about we get some cameras and record what happens, then in court we can just use the videos as evidence. Maybe an aerial view would give a good perspective on events?
I think it is more like you have one pure mathematician who works out some crazy new maths and then you get an applied mathematician who works out how to use it for something practical.
Putting a slideshow into a flash movie is unnecessary and irritating. To get larger images I need to use the full screen option when the images take up less than half my screen area.
Because then the standard becomes useless as mentioned in the article. What is needed is a video format that will play for everyone within the browser rather than needing a mess of duplicated content on the server. H.264 cannot provide this reasonably because it kills any open source browsers which is hardly a good proposition for an open web standard.
This is the same as my PC. My web browser looks different to my word processor. Wow, my PC has a revolutionary interface, all buttons look like buttons for consistency but they vary in positioning and what they do for each application. A little arrow pointing left always means go back in whatever program I am using whether it is my web browser, file browser or pdf reader. When I select a text box this little flashing cursor always appears and then if I try typing on my keyboard text appears in the box, it is wonderful how this happens everywhere.
I thought similarly at first but I then realised that it is actually better for both of you if you go down the side. As long as you keep left the car can easily move past you when you start off rather than if you wait in line then the car behind you gets stuck. Also you are just wasting your time for no reason.
The roads here are designed to be used in this way because there is a separate section for cyclists marked onto the road in front of where the cars have to wait at a junction. Also quite a few roads have cycle lanes on the left leading up to a junction so you can cycle along this past the cars.
All I know is that three certain windows updates have been drilled into my Vista boot process for ever. Did someone really intentionally program an update process so that if it failed it would just try again?
Ah no you have made an invalid assumption. You are thinking that he was measuring distance in cartesian space. What he said was "1 light year away on the same wall" which clearly implies that he was measuring distance using a geometry based on the wall. (Also your maths fails in cartesian geometry because he never said that the pointer described a semicircle so in fact a line between the two points would be a chord of the circle on length 1 light year.)
Indeed, and this has been successfully implemented in several companies. I the UK, at least, there are supermarkets (Coop, Waitrose), department stores (John Lewis (same as Waitrose)), Building societies and many more. Building societies are an especially interesting one because recently a lot of building societies converted to banks. Since early in the recession none of the converted building societies have survived on their own, they have all been bought out.
No I don't cycle through red lights. I just cycle past the queuing traffic to reach the red light. Cyclists should follow pretty much the same rules as cars with regard to traffic lights and pedestrians.
Re:Great, still doesn't fix the Houston problem.
on
The Year of the E-Bicycle
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
I am in Cambridge at the moment and it is great for bikes. I think it may have the largest bike density in Britain. A combination of a University in the town centre and it being pretty flat are probably the main factors. There are lots of good cycle lanes, many one way roads have a cycle lane in the opposite direction so the one way system hardly affects cyclists. Around the town centre bike is the fastest way to get around, you get more possible routes, and at traffic lights you can just cycle straight past the queuing traffic. Plus with so many cyclists cars watch out for bikes and are considerate generally. It can get a bit crazy around lecture switch over times though and parking your bike can be a problem if you are going to a lecture even though they probably have several hundred places where you can lock your bike (at one busy area near several lecture theatres).
Surely their systems aren't so bad as to deliver the wrong medicine to the wrong patient. I can understand the odd slip up leading to the wrong medicine for the right patient or the right medicine for the wrong patient but getting both wrong at once must happen far less frequently.
They resolved an issue which lead to file being overwritten being left empty on a crash. The problem was that they were optimising the write order to make performance better. This lead to metadata being updated too early in some cases so you would get a corrupted file. Now the issue has been resolved which lowered the performance although I think there may be an option you could turn on. So if an application is updating the file you will get the old version or the new version (assuming they have written the program in a half decent way) of the file which is good enough. If you want anything better than that you should be running a UPS which should be correctly configured to safely shut the system down (unlike one system I experienced that had a UPS but then everything crashed when the UPS ran out of battery because the sysadmins were appalling).
It is worth testing to pick up regressions so that you can fix them. Something like the extreme Postgre slowdown they showed. It is better to catch that at the alpha stage.
Slashdot Mirror
Android has a native development kit so you can use languages other than Java. It is just primarily designed to use Java.
No, this is the normal behaviour for a Linux dual screen setup. I have a dual screen system with gnome and this works with zero config. You can even get the benefits of having a second task bar by simply adding one to the second screen and by default each taskbar now only shows the programs on its screen.
What is wanted is a separate workspace for each screen so each screen has a group of windows on it which can be independently changed. So currently if you change workspace both screens change because they are just one workspace. This is also the way that the powertoy provided by Microsoft does this.
So Linux does by default what Windows can do by installing an additional program plus using a more complicated setup Linux can handle independent workspace switching however with a caveat of not being able to drag windows between monitors. The question asks if the second is possible with windows able to be dragged between desktops.
Maybe my first comment was slightly insulting, so far as a factual statement can be an insult. As some friendly advice, next time someone mentions you may not have understood something perhaps you should try to actually understand it before making more incorrect statements.
No you are missing the point. The man in the middle can modify stuff going through so they just change the page itself rather than trying to use fancy XSS attacks.
Maybe you will get modded down for not knowing what you are talking about instead. What is being asked involves having a separate workspace on each screen. Windows does not have workspaces hence the functionality is not possible in windows. The question actually described two ways fo having a dual screen setup in linux one of which is identical to the way Windows does it. If you don't understand something, read about it first.
What slant does the BBC have? I have never noticed any particularly strong slant in general. Wikipedia says that some people (mainly right wing) accuse the BBC of being left wing whereas others (mainly left wing) accuse BBC of being too right wing. It has no obvious external force biasing it.
Try getting a tablet PC. You can get some which have a keyboard as well so you just flip the screen over and turn it into a tablet. Best of both worlds except it is a bit thicker and heavier. They are used a bit here at university because you can easily write notes on them with a stylus.
Not only that but the name has been trademarked by Fujitsu http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article7006023.ece
Of course at the time that was a perfectly sensible comment. Apple actually changed their iPod so now you can use it with usb, iTunes is available on Windows and you can get an iPod for significantly less than $400.
I have a great idea. How about we get some cameras and record what happens, then in court we can just use the videos as evidence. Maybe an aerial view would give a good perspective on events?
The article says the costs increased by $2 since 2008. So the headline is actually referring to something that happened back before 2008.
I think it is more like you have one pure mathematician who works out some crazy new maths and then you get an applied mathematician who works out how to use it for something practical.
Putting a slideshow into a flash movie is unnecessary and irritating. To get larger images I need to use the full screen option when the images take up less than half my screen area.
Because then the standard becomes useless as mentioned in the article. What is needed is a video format that will play for everyone within the browser rather than needing a mess of duplicated content on the server. H.264 cannot provide this reasonably because it kills any open source browsers which is hardly a good proposition for an open web standard.
It is pretty hard to justify when here is the UK you can get 7600 sheets of cheap paper for £19 ~ $30. Biro's cost pennies as well.
This is the same as my PC. My web browser looks different to my word processor. Wow, my PC has a revolutionary interface, all buttons look like buttons for consistency but they vary in positioning and what they do for each application. A little arrow pointing left always means go back in whatever program I am using whether it is my web browser, file browser or pdf reader. When I select a text box this little flashing cursor always appears and then if I try typing on my keyboard text appears in the box, it is wonderful how this happens everywhere.
I thought similarly at first but I then realised that it is actually better for both of you if you go down the side. As long as you keep left the car can easily move past you when you start off rather than if you wait in line then the car behind you gets stuck. Also you are just wasting your time for no reason.
The roads here are designed to be used in this way because there is a separate section for cyclists marked onto the road in front of where the cars have to wait at a junction. Also quite a few roads have cycle lanes on the left leading up to a junction so you can cycle along this past the cars.
You're doing it wrong. If you don't RTFA then you will be happily oblivious.
All I know is that three certain windows updates have been drilled into my Vista boot process for ever. Did someone really intentionally program an update process so that if it failed it would just try again?
Ah no you have made an invalid assumption. You are thinking that he was measuring distance in cartesian space. What he said was "1 light year away on the same wall" which clearly implies that he was measuring distance using a geometry based on the wall. (Also your maths fails in cartesian geometry because he never said that the pointer described a semicircle so in fact a line between the two points would be a chord of the circle on length 1 light year.)
Indeed, and this has been successfully implemented in several companies. I the UK, at least, there are supermarkets (Coop, Waitrose), department stores (John Lewis (same as Waitrose)), Building societies and many more. Building societies are an especially interesting one because recently a lot of building societies converted to banks. Since early in the recession none of the converted building societies have survived on their own, they have all been bought out.
No I don't cycle through red lights. I just cycle past the queuing traffic to reach the red light. Cyclists should follow pretty much the same rules as cars with regard to traffic lights and pedestrians.
I am in Cambridge at the moment and it is great for bikes. I think it may have the largest bike density in Britain. A combination of a University in the town centre and it being pretty flat are probably the main factors. There are lots of good cycle lanes, many one way roads have a cycle lane in the opposite direction so the one way system hardly affects cyclists. Around the town centre bike is the fastest way to get around, you get more possible routes, and at traffic lights you can just cycle straight past the queuing traffic. Plus with so many cyclists cars watch out for bikes and are considerate generally. It can get a bit crazy around lecture switch over times though and parking your bike can be a problem if you are going to a lecture even though they probably have several hundred places where you can lock your bike (at one busy area near several lecture theatres).
Surely their systems aren't so bad as to deliver the wrong medicine to the wrong patient. I can understand the odd slip up leading to the wrong medicine for the right patient or the right medicine for the wrong patient but getting both wrong at once must happen far less frequently.
They resolved an issue which lead to file being overwritten being left empty on a crash. The problem was that they were optimising the write order to make performance better. This lead to metadata being updated too early in some cases so you would get a corrupted file. Now the issue has been resolved which lowered the performance although I think there may be an option you could turn on. So if an application is updating the file you will get the old version or the new version (assuming they have written the program in a half decent way) of the file which is good enough. If you want anything better than that you should be running a UPS which should be correctly configured to safely shut the system down (unlike one system I experienced that had a UPS but then everything crashed when the UPS ran out of battery because the sysadmins were appalling).
It is worth testing to pick up regressions so that you can fix them. Something like the extreme Postgre slowdown they showed. It is better to catch that at the alpha stage.