Slashdot Mirror
Ubuntu 10.04 Alpha 2 vs. Early Fedora 13 Benchmarks
Given that early benchmarks of the Lucid Lynx were less than encouraging, Phoronix decided to take the latest alpha out for a spin and has set it side-by-side with an early look at Fedora 13. "Overall, there are both positive and negative performance changes for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Alpha 2 in relation to Ubuntu 9.10. Most of the negative regressions are attributed to the EXT4 file-system losing some of its performance charm. With using a pre-alpha snapshot of Fedora 13 and the benchmark results just being provided for reference purposes, we will hold off on looking into greater detail at this next Red Hat Linux update until it matures."
beta vs beta! Is anyone expecting valid results.?
Catering to niche users at the expense of the majority.
Removing functionality from X. Deleting the ability to restore a feature.
Making it damn near impossible to troubleshoot X crashes.
Ppppppp-p p p ulseaudio
I'm not much enthused by Ubuntu anymore.
I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
I wish they'd stop focusing on increasing performance by a few milliseconds here and there and work out why my upgrades never work, or flash objects turn grey and i have to restart firefox or why my audio is choppy, and why the nvidia drivers make Xorg fail randomly or why I have to press the power button on my PC to take it off after everthing is unloaded.
Alphas aren't even feature complete... Wait at least for beta...? I mean, the roles could be reversed in the beta, or next alpha.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
or flash objects turn grey and i have to restart firefox
You'll have to ask Adobe about that one. Ubuntu developers cannot trace into software for which they do not have the source code. Or is this happening to you in Gnash?
I remember reading that ext4 loses data. Has this been addressed?
___
If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
Why compare Ubuntu with anything? In my experience it's Debian, with a horrible colour scheme and a screwed up GUI. It's gone downhill so fast it's been like a toboggan ride.
== Jez ==
Do you miss Firefox? Try Pale Moon.
What often really matters are the upstream apps. Often, other than reporting an upstream bug in an application to the developer, there is not much one can really do about bugs in upstream applications like KDE. I am seeing that now with KDE and X.org. Currently, there is a bug in evdev and dga in X that prevents X from working right with a Wiimote. It can't really be fixed by the distributor. Only X.org can fix it.
So far I have:
Broken Sound effects on Stratagus. (Mandriva 2010.0)
Broken GLX Support on QuakeForge. (Mandriva 2010.0) But DarkPlaces Quake still works.
Broken Wiimote Support in the evdev driver.
These are just a few examples of applications that don't work becaues of a problem upstream.
By pulling a computer from a dumpster, outfitting it with a $100 hard disk, and installing Linux, I get a giant file server, saving me $200 on an easy backup solution (vs. Apple's Time Capsule). That makes me $200 richer than I would be otherwise, meaning I can use that money elsewhere. With the money I've saved over the years thanks to Linux and other open-source packages, I will soon be taking a Caribbean cruise. Has your "real" Mac ever paid for your vacation?
You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
This 'review' is complete rubbish alpha and beta builds are allays much slower than the production versions. They have all types of debug options turned on. I don' see how you can compare them. If one os has more debug options turned on than the other it would be slower. Surely....
Wanna know why Ubuntu is the linux flavor to beat? It's fun to use. No messy compiling of the kernel, no conf files to edit to get it up and running, it just works. Especially with the latest revamp of the alsa interface, not to mention the snazzy layout of the repo browser. Track record last few releases has been good.
my linux runs on a mac, you insensitive clod!
Wake me when Grub2 supports FakeRAID...
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
What the hell is a bad performance improvement?
buy a mac homos! or are you too poor to afford a real computer?
To put it bluntly, your beloved Mac is an expensive x86 PC with a fancy case design.
I wouldn't be surprised if the very same chinese Mac factories also produce cheapo generic boards.
If your distribution closely follows upstream, and has a good policy on dealing with upstream it can help to report bugs. The keys to this are 1. Patching the distributions instance of a package as little as possible, so it's as much like upstream as possible 2. Having packagers work closely with upstream to ensure that bugs filed against the distribution are filed against the upstream project. 3. If a fix is made in the distribution- to get that patch offered upstream.
They probably do. But the parts for the mac boards are sourced from different suppliers, which is what makes all the difference.
moox. for a new generation.
Yes, the inductors and transformers for Macs are hand-rolled on the thighs of virgins.
It's like "Boohoo Ubuntu tries to make a distro for the average user, thereby stripping me of my nerd-cred as Joe Smoe will no longer cower in my presence as I whip up a serving of my CLI-fu...".
If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
First off, let me say that I use Ubuntu 9.10 on my system at work. I am also running CentOS on servers, various Ubuntu on servers and a couple of Fedora systems. As you can see, I have experience with all of them.
So why is this review useless? Because they are testing development systems, which are not optimized, have loads of debugging flags set, and essentially are not ready for prime time. Of course it may be running slower!
IMHO, you should ignore benchmarks until the release candidates, at least. I generally ignore benchmarks on unreleased systems. I do, however, like to read and learn about new features which may be present in early releases.
What you mean with KDE?
You have not heard that KDE means the community and KDE Software Compilation means all the official software like Plasma-Desktop, Plasma-Netbook, KDE Platform and KDE Applications (Some are part of KDE SC but most are 3rd party apps like Amarok, digiKam, KOffice etc)
The performance regression for EXT 4 is just terrible.
Other than the "safety" thing, is there any other advantage EXT 4 offers?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague
Dell and a few other companies have been bitten by the bug. Depending on who you source your parts from depends on the quality (and longevity) of your computers (and reputation). I have no doubt that the parts going into a $120 Intel brand motherboard cost a few cents more each than a similar AsRock or ECS Elitegroup board that costs half as much. You get what you pay for. Intel stuff generally doesn't break in the same decade you buy it. You're lucky to make it to the end of the warranty period with noname crap from newegg or Frys.
moox. for a new generation.
and it's software(incl. backup system) and different gadets that works together well without you have to waste time maintaining it or figure out how to get it to work.
Well that was a waste of time, wasn't it? Durrrr.
What's the point of your 'benchmark' then?
Banu
One that removes important previously relied on and adapted to functions in order to create said performance improvement.
That's pretty much the experience I've had. My dad bought a Gateway desktop in 2006 (S-939 Athlon 64) and just outside of the [short] warranty period the motherboard started dying. The on-board video started going, so I got him a cheap video card to circumvent the problem. That worked for almost a year until the south-bridge died too. All in all I think the box lasted about 3 years. In comparison, I built my own system with similar specs in 2005, but with decent brand-name parts, and I've had very very few problems with it.
30 year old MALE virgins whose sexual innocence is the result of poor hygiene and high functioning autism.
Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
Instead of sshfs+cp, if you want to perform incremental backups without wasting space (duplicating storage), you might try rsync with hardlinks. It appears back-in-time can do this also.
This article is great:
http://www.sanitarium.net/golug/rsync_backups_2010.html
s/pulse/false/
fixed that for you!
Like Apple's early days!!! I suspect Woz's thighs are bigger now though...
Oh, is that what all these Slashdot posters are doing for work? And how do *you* keep the resin from getting stuck to your undies?
If it breaks before the warranty period expires, you get a new one. If you make it to the end of the warranty period before it breaks, you have to buy a new one. So you may wish to rethink that statement ;).
Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
Fat ugly ones, with facial hair!
Broken Wiimote Support in the evdev driver.
I must've missed something... when did Nintendo switch over to using standard HID protocols instead of their proprietary wiimote one which has never worked on any OS's standard input driver?
my clod runs on insensitive you linux running mac!
You still have to mail it back to the manufacturer, wait for them to confirm it's broke, and then mail you a new one from china. Plus crack open the computer, and deal with all the MS "you've installed new hardware" BS. For a $40 piece of equipment. Getting a new warranty replacement piece of equipment from a bargain bin manufacturer might take longer than the warranty is good for (three months). Gigabyte and ASUS are better about their parts, but you have to ask yourself "how much BS am I willing to put up with" and "how long am I willing to not have a functional computer while it's replaced for "free"?" before you pick the noname brand.
moox. for a new generation.
Intel stuff generally doesn't break in the same decade you buy it. You're lucky to make it to the end of the warranty period with noname crap from newegg or Frys.
Number of motherboards I've bought over the years: 12.
Cheap motherboards (as in cheapest I could find that had features I wanted) I've bought: 9 out of 12.
Number of motherboards that have ever failed on me: 1
Brand of failed motherboard: Intel. 440 GX chipset, failed within a year of building that Pentium III computer.
The bad capacitor stuff you're talking about did happen. It plagued several manufacturers including, from your own fucking wikipedia article, "Apple motherboards and power supplies in Apple G5s." In addition, that was a manufacturing defect in several Taiwanese plants, which has since been corrected, and the problem has pretty much completely disappeared.
I cant understand all the criticism. I guess that is because PA works for me. Flawlessly too, I admit. Webcam, audio, video and web and if I want, all concurrently.
Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
It's a hack. Fedora did it right.
I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty