I watched the speech yesterday, and saying Ballmer is "interested" in an Free/OS browser engine is complete bullshit.
The title of this article is simply misleading. It should be changed.
For starters, the woman who asked the question (they were not her questions) said she though the question was a bit "cheeky". Ballmer then repeated what she said basically, and then said he doesn't know what cheeky means, and suggested another word in replacement of cheeky.
He went on to say that he is happy/confident with his IE8 developers.
This article makes Slashdot look bad.
Try Pingus. It's a free lemmings clone covered by the GNU GPL. http://pingus.seul.org/
I watched the speech yesterday, and saying Ballmer is "interested" in an Free/OS browser engine is complete bullshit. The title of this article is simply misleading. It should be changed. For starters, the woman who asked the question (they were not her questions) said she though the question was a bit "cheeky". Ballmer then repeated what she said basically, and then said he doesn't know what cheeky means, and suggested another word in replacement of cheeky. He went on to say that he is happy/confident with his IE8 developers. This article makes Slashdot look bad.
I wonder if an angry republican supporter will attempt to kill Obama.
It's Payne! Whack the sucker!
Holy shit that was funny!
Which spam? ;)
Just think... wwrmsd? It would be unethical to accept their offer.
I'll still be playing Quakeworld with my trusty mouse, I have no doubts!