Why not? A cheap hosting provider is probably serving hundreds or thousands of sites from a single box, it makes sense to invest in an hardware solution that can be shared between all of them.
And you can get free certs, as long as you don't need extra validation.
Yes, but my country has proportional representation and yet has been government by shitty, corrupt parties since the 70s, when we transitioned from a fascist to a democratic state.
I think it has much to do with the electorate and culture of the institutions.
Seriously, between the shittiness that is our national government and the shittiness that is the European Commission (fairly well demonstrated by having put my countryman Barroso in "charge"), the European Parliament seems like the only sane institution around here.
Sure. And you can just install a hidden camera. So what?
The point is not to make it technically impossible to record. They just didn't put record capabilities because it's illegal to record anyway, so it'd be useless.
Uh, no. If you write 'amazon.com' in your browser and the domain has an A record, it'll resolve directly. You don't need any alias - you don't even need to have a 'www.' subdomain configured.
Thanks darling, but I claim no such thing. Like many people, she didn't fit the labels cleanly, but she was still much more a New- or American-style Conservative than a traditional European conservative.
the thing that people do not recognise is that Margaret Thatcher is not in terms of belief a Tory. She is a nineteenth-century Liberal.
-- Milton Friedman
The kind of Conservatism which he and I...favoured would be best described as âliberalâ(TM), in the old-fashioned sense.
-- Keith Joseph
She was much more a New- or American-style Conservative than a traditional European conservative.
That definition of conservatism is limited to the American conservatives; in Europe, where the term originated, conservatives were far from fans of capitalism, much less of laissez-fair, and supported a controlling state with strong ties to the dominant religion (Catholic Church here in Latin countries), like in the "God, Homeland and Family" motto that was used here in Portugal.
I'm not GP, but I've listened to it a bunch of times before going to their concert in '09, and I frankly never picked it up again. It's OK, but hardly worth repeating the experience.
To expand: I think it's plain and obvious that it's extremely different to live in a place where maybe more than two millennia ago some people lived and were defeated (and no longer even exist), as opposed to living in the place where the fight is occurring, and therefore supporting it.
Your argument is a complete false equivalence, and I despise your position that we should strive to be nothing more than animals, taking other's land by force, as much as I would despise someone who took yours.
You said that the non-acceptance of the UN plan by the Arabs justifies the expansion of Israel. Therefore, the Arabs had to choose between accepting a plan that took away a bunch of their land, or eventually have much more of their land taken away with the justification that they didn't accept the plan.
And this story demonstrates another problem: most Linux gamers dual-boot anyway, so most Linux sales a publisher could get would probably cause an equivalent drop on the Windows side.
Maybe the 30% tax on the upcoming "Windows Marketplace" - assuming it kills third-party platforms - can change this equation, but I doubt it.
Oh, I have no doubts that there is much more violence begin carried on today in the name of Islam than any other religion, possibly combined. I just don't like whitewashing.
And there is nothing tenuous about what the Catholic Church did during Franco. They were Catholic priests and nuns - not just the average believer - stealing thousands of babies from their mothers for decades.
Slashdot Mirror
Communism never meant you could use whatever you want; not in theory, nor in practice. The principle was "to each according to his need".
SSL certificates are not the problem: https://cert.startcom.org/
The problem is that some browsers (mainly IE on XP) don't support SNI, so your website needs a dedicated IPv4.
If you manage the machine, you can get a VPS with a dedicated IP for almost nothing (I pay $3/month), but managed web hosting is another issue.
Why not? A cheap hosting provider is probably serving hundreds or thousands of sites from a single box, it makes sense to invest in an hardware solution that can be shared between all of them.
And you can get free certs, as long as you don't need extra validation.
Yes, but my country has proportional representation and yet has been government by shitty, corrupt parties since the 70s, when we transitioned from a fascist to a democratic state.
I think it has much to do with the electorate and culture of the institutions.
Seriously, between the shittiness that is our national government and the shittiness that is the European Commission (fairly well demonstrated by having put my countryman Barroso in "charge"), the European Parliament seems like the only sane institution around here.
Sure. And you can just install a hidden camera. So what?
The point is not to make it technically impossible to record. They just didn't put record capabilities because it's illegal to record anyway, so it'd be useless.
Uh, no. If you write 'amazon.com' in your browser and the domain has an A record, it'll resolve directly. You don't need any alias - you don't even need to have a 'www.' subdomain configured.
Even if that was true, not all parties are part of the government, so they can still tell what the government doesn't want people to know.
And before you claim that "the two parties are the same", consider that the US is just one of many countries.
I made a mistake, the last quote is actually Thatcher's, in the memorial lecture of Keith Joseph.
But I don't deny she was a conservative, I'm saying she was a New- or American-style conservative, not a traditional European conservative.
And 'conservationist' is someone who advocates conservation of natural resources. You mean 'conservative'.
Uh, the GPL doesn't prevent you from making money from the distribution of code, not even by selling it.
Thanks darling, but I claim no such thing. Like many people, she didn't fit the labels cleanly, but she was still much more a New- or American-style Conservative than a traditional European conservative.
the thing that people do not recognise is that Margaret Thatcher is not in terms of belief a Tory. She is a nineteenth-century Liberal.
-- Milton Friedman
The kind of Conservatism which he and I...favoured would be best described as âliberalâ(TM), in the old-fashioned sense.
-- Keith Joseph
She was much more a New- or American-style Conservative than a traditional European conservative.
That's not the source of Dropbox, that's just the Nautilus extension. The daemon is proprietary too.
That definition of conservatism is limited to the American conservatives; in Europe, where the term originated, conservatives were far from fans of capitalism, much less of laissez-fair, and supported a controlling state with strong ties to the dominant religion (Catholic Church here in Latin countries), like in the "God, Homeland and Family" motto that was used here in Portugal.
I'm not GP, but I've listened to it a bunch of times before going to their concert in '09, and I frankly never picked it up again. It's OK, but hardly worth repeating the experience.
To expand: I think it's plain and obvious that it's extremely different to live in a place where maybe more than two millennia ago some people lived and were defeated (and no longer even exist), as opposed to living in the place where the fight is occurring, and therefore supporting it.
Your argument is a complete false equivalence, and I despise your position that we should strive to be nothing more than animals, taking other's land by force, as much as I would despise someone who took yours.
I don't live in the US nor am I from there, but nice try.
Weren't they living there?
You said that the non-acceptance of the UN plan by the Arabs justifies the expansion of Israel. Therefore, the Arabs had to choose between accepting a plan that took away a bunch of their land, or eventually have much more of their land taken away with the justification that they didn't accept the plan.
Why should the Arabs have to choose between accepting the UN plan or getting invaded by Israel?
And this story demonstrates another problem: most Linux gamers dual-boot anyway, so most Linux sales a publisher could get would probably cause an equivalent drop on the Windows side.
Maybe the 30% tax on the upcoming "Windows Marketplace" - assuming it kills third-party platforms - can change this equation, but I doubt it.
I know not who Martin Luthor was, but Martin Luther was the guy quoted a lot by the ruling party members in Germany in the 1930s.
Oh, I have no doubts that there is much more violence begin carried on today in the name of Islam than any other religion, possibly combined. I just don't like whitewashing.
And there is nothing tenuous about what the Catholic Church did during Franco. They were Catholic priests and nuns - not just the average believer - stealing thousands of babies from their mothers for decades.
No, but they might bomb you if you offend them by being in a nightclub for people with the wrong sexual orientation.
You may also offend them by being poor, in which case they might just steal your recently born baby.
Of course, these are exceptions. But so is your accusation.
And what government would that be?
http://slashdot.org/submission