"Because the problem is so large, and such an emergency, that it/must/ be dealt with right now. Word is that that without the bailout, we had two weeks before the shit hit the fan."
"It was almost thirty years ago, between 1980 and 1985."
Bullshit liar, there weren't a dozen hispanics in Orlando then, and there's no fucking way what you lied about was true in 80-85.
I caught you you lying piece of trash, I FUCKING KNEW you were lying and your "it happened 20 odd years ago (when there weren't but a handful of Hispanics in Orlando) and I can't remember the street (because it never fucking happened)" bullshit is transparent. I would have taken major crosstreets mother fucker, but you would lie and pretend you didn't remeber them either, becuase you know ANYTHING you saw won't be true.
"As to "make myself look important", lay off the crack pipe, son."
Hey douchebag, YOU ARE THE ONE WHO GOT CAUGHT LYING ON A FUCKING WEB BOARD. All the "crack pipe" jabs in the world won't make you less pathetic liar.
With all due respect, save that bullshit for someone who hasn't been a resident of Orlando for over 30 years (that would be me, not you). Thee isn't anyplace like what you describe, save it, no there isn't. I travel through the most heavily ethnic areas in Orlando, and I know you're simply making shit up.
No wonder she is your "then wife", she saw you as the same thing I do, a lying sack of garbage.
So, since I know you're lying about that, and I challenge you to name the store and location (street names liar, don't cop out), because I know you're full of shit and can't.
It's pretty fucking sad that you have to lie about something so trivial just to make yourself feel important.
Please quote anywhere in his post that says "one side of the political spectrum" has anything cornered.
Then, when you fail to find it because it's not there, spend some time examining why your stupid knee-jerk response assumed so, and why you're incapable of looking at criticism of your side (save the denials, you won't convince anyone) without whining about being pigeonholed like you did.
The criticism is accurate and valid. You not liking it changes nothing.
ONE study does not "debunk" anything. A handful of studies don't even "debunk" something.
The way that word gets misused around here is infuriating. Newsflash people, a bunch of studies that agree with your position DO NOT debunk anything, especially when the opposing position also has research backing them.
The fact that a study you like or agree with exists does not magically make opposing research vanish.
I was a special ed teacher in an urban school for 6 years. I'm fairly sure you were one of my students.
So when you say " you have not provided any value so far" you meant " you've done far more than most, including me, but because I'm a moron who can't refute you, I'll reply and make an ass of myself instead", right?
As to being able to take care of myself, do you have some kind of reading problem on top of your stunted emotional state? Or do you think those investments were for fun?
PS, please don't breed, I have no desire to support your entire family, and you having 23 chromosomes isn't a legitimate excuse.
No guy, they won't be paying for my anything, I've invested wisely like everyone should, that way we won't have to hear idiotic arguments like yours.
The fact that you just assume everyone needs nannying is indicative of the errors in your thought process, and is probably the major reason you think it's the corporations "responsibility" to do anything more than give you a safe workplace.
I can't tell you how much I hate assholes like you who think you have a right to go in my pocket for your pet projects.
I ask because I've seen the answers to that question and have yet to see one that isn't essentially a petulant tantrum. And yes, I've seen your responses.
So tell me why, and do so with the idea that "for the good of society" is an argument I reject, then keep in mind your opinion on the matter is no more authoritative than anyone else's.
What's he going to do? Get a shitty job and earn someone's trust to get his life back on track.
Please explain why you think his unwillingess to do that is the fault of anyone but him (as you attempt to imply in your post). I didn't realize prison had the effect of completely removing a person's work ethic.
And please don't pretend ex-prisoners can't even get shitty jobs, I'd rather not converse with someone who would claim something stupid that.
"thw worst thing you can do is ramp up production and burn through your last remaining drops"
This just isn't accurate,especially in this case. If the oil were irreplacable, you may have an argument, but it isn't.
As the cost of oil goes up, the financial incentive to use something else increases, while also becoming cost competitive.
If you ration, you create artificial scarcity, but you also remove a major incentive to find alternatives. In addition, and not accidentally IMNSHO, you condition people to live on an energy diet. I'm sure some of you love that idea, but I consider rationing out of necessity a scientific failure.
Second, way to be a classless twat and call names anonymously, I'm sure whatever stupid justification you use will be good enough for you.
Third, if you use the software and IT FUCKING WORKS THAT is how you know it works. What a moron like you "thinks" about it irrelvant.
I guarantee you right now people are running tiny little apps they threw together and never debugged, but that do the job.
You can "think" they're not working all you like, but you sound like a humongous retard saying so while the apps are chugging away.
Also, using isn't testing. You sound even more retarded not only trying rhis point, but repeating it as though you saying something stupid over and over makes it definitive.
Last, I'm quite happy you think I'm an asshole, I have no patience for idiots like you and even less of a desire to endear myself to you.
Why don't you insult me as an AC again, that was closer to what you have the intelligence for. Leave the rational debate for people who aren't stupid enough to say "Code that works DOESN'T WORK" like you did.
"you can't know if a piece of code "works" if you never tested or debugged it"
Hmm, so running the code and seeing it do the job you intendedit for won't tell you it "works"?
OH, YES IT WILL
If i write code that does the job I intended for it, but have never debugged it, you're claiming that's not working code.
That, frankly, is about the dumbest thing I've see posred here, and apart from being logically vacuous ("code that works but hasn't been tested or debugged doesn't work" um, WTF?) it's just wrong.
"You simply cannot "make it work" without researching and understanding the standards. Period"
So a piece of code that does everything it is supposed to with no problems, and works perfectly, but hasn't been debugged or standardized, magically doesn't work because YOU SAY SO?
Sorry, no,that's just moronic on it's face. please don't even attempt to tell me people aren't right now running code that works perfecty but has never been debugged or standardized. Accoring to YOU, that code that is working pwrfectly for them "cannot be made to work". Yet it is.
You simply cannot make your point sound intelligent or correct. Period (see I did what you did so my point is irrefutable now, right?).
Because, even if you got lucky and made no mistakes, YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THAT UNTIL YOU FACT CHECKED IT, PROOFREAD IT AND EDITED IT. With code, if it works, nothing else is necessary. With code the goal is to work. With texts, the goal is accuracy and clarity which you cannot have without review. Software has NO such requirement, and your attempts to argue otherwise are demonstrably wrong.
Furthermore, you posted AC which is a tacit admission that your point is too stupid to assign your name to.
Even furthermore, calling me an asshole at the end of a post that had virtually no intelligent commentary in it doesn't do anything to change the fact that I'm right, and frankly, if you zealots think I'm an asshole after I've destroyed your delusions about open source software like I did here, then I'll take the insult with pride.
It must suck for you that you're factually wrong AND you proved yourself pathetic in the same post.
Move along AC, we adults are discussing things you've proven you're not smart enough to understand.
Slashdot Mirror
"Because the problem is so large, and such an emergency, that it /must/ be dealt with right now. Word is that that without the bailout, we had two weeks before the shit hit the fan."
"Word is" huh?
God you people are idiots...
And my taxes already pay for criminal prosecution.
So, in light of that, what is insightful about his irrelevant, yet predictably cynical observation?
"the smaller the government is, the better"
This is the opposite if what a liberal is defined as in the US. Perhaps they were confused by the dissimilar application of the word?
"You say that as if it is a self-evident truth, but I'm afraid I must vehemently disagree with you."
Of course you do, you're a fucking racist. You proved it when you lied about Hispanics
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=947929&cid=24798649
Then, when held to task, you "couldn't remember" anything specific about it.
You're a racist liar, and now everyone knows it.
"It was almost thirty years ago, between 1980 and 1985."
Bullshit liar, there weren't a dozen hispanics in Orlando then, and there's no fucking way what you lied about was true in 80-85.
I caught you you lying piece of trash, I FUCKING KNEW you were lying and your "it happened 20 odd years ago (when there weren't but a handful of Hispanics in Orlando) and I can't remember the street (because it never fucking happened)" bullshit is transparent. I would have taken major crosstreets mother fucker, but you would lie and pretend you didn't remeber them either, becuase you know ANYTHING you saw won't be true.
"As to "make myself look important", lay off the crack pipe, son."
Hey douchebag, YOU ARE THE ONE WHO GOT CAUGHT LYING ON A FUCKING WEB BOARD. All the "crack pipe" jabs in the world won't make you less pathetic liar.
With all due respect, save that bullshit for someone who hasn't been a resident of Orlando for over 30 years (that would be me, not you). Thee isn't anyplace like what you describe, save it, no there isn't. I travel through the most heavily ethnic areas in Orlando, and I know you're simply making shit up.
No wonder she is your "then wife", she saw you as the same thing I do, a lying sack of garbage.
So, since I know you're lying about that, and I challenge you to name the store and location (street names liar, don't cop out), because I know you're full of shit and can't.
It's pretty fucking sad that you have to lie about something so trivial just to make yourself feel important.
"Actually..."
Actually, you're a fucking idiot, and nothing you said there was accurate.
It must suck for you having your people's bias (which you pretend doesn't exist because of your bias) exposed like it was.
Care to cry about it some more, baby?
WWWAAAAAAHHHHH!!!
Please quote anywhere in his post that says "one side of the political spectrum" has anything cornered.
Then, when you fail to find it because it's not there, spend some time examining why your stupid knee-jerk response assumed so, and why you're incapable of looking at criticism of your side (save the denials, you won't convince anyone) without whining about being pigeonholed like you did.
The criticism is accurate and valid. You not liking it changes nothing.
ONE study does not "debunk" anything. A handful of studies don't even "debunk" something.
The way that word gets misused around here is infuriating. Newsflash people, a bunch of studies that agree with your position DO NOT debunk anything, especially when the opposing position also has research backing them.
The fact that a study you like or agree with exists does not magically make opposing research vanish.
Please shut the fuck up until you're not an idiot. NO EMPLOYER can require you to somethin illegal.
Make all the stupid excuse you like, you're just wrong, and if you're being pressured to do things you shouldn't be, it's because you're allowing it.
And retaliation is illegal too, so your attempt to pretend that retaliation is a deterrent fails as well.
See, in the real world, bullshit excuses like yours are exposed.
Welcome to the real world QuantumG.
I was a special ed teacher in an urban school for 6 years. I'm fairly sure you were one of my students.
So when you say " you have not provided any value so far" you meant " you've done far more than most, including me, but because I'm a moron who can't refute you, I'll reply and make an ass of myself instead", right?
As to being able to take care of myself, do you have some kind of reading problem on top of your stunted emotional state? Or do you think those investments were for fun?
PS, please don't breed, I have no desire to support your entire family, and you having 23 chromosomes isn't a legitimate excuse.
How about you get your fucking hands out of my pockets and stop pretending what you want allows you to do so in order to assuage your guilt.
That way I'll have some investments left instead of having them forcibly seized because assholes like you think it's "good for society".
Your grasp of economics sucks,
D.
"My emplioyer can require us to do anything they like..."
That's just garbage. They can't require you break the law for example, even in "at will" states.
No guy, they won't be paying for my anything, I've invested wisely like everyone should, that way we won't have to hear idiotic arguments like yours.
The fact that you just assume everyone needs nannying is indicative of the errors in your thought process, and is probably the major reason you think it's the corporations "responsibility" to do anything more than give you a safe workplace.
I can't tell you how much I hate assholes like you who think you have a right to go in my pocket for your pet projects.
Why don't you tell me which states have gone bankrupt, how frequently it happened, and how long it took to fix.
In the meantime, we'll ignore your ridiculous "property values = well run state governnment" tripe.
Man, I don't which is worse that you live a "life" like that, or that you're proud of it.
Maybe we're lampooning California because they overuse their cancer labels.
It seems you're ok with that even knowing that such overuse will make them worthless.
So, why are you advocating action that will make then worthless?
"so if I sell something I didn't create and collect 100% of the profits I'm a criminal"
You are when you're selling something that isn't your right to sell.
And what idiot wasted a modpoint on that stupidity?
He's not very bright, that's how.
So WHY should they be out of copyright?
I ask because I've seen the answers to that question and have yet to see one that isn't essentially a petulant tantrum. And yes, I've seen your responses.
So tell me why, and do so with the idea that "for the good of society" is an argument I reject, then keep in mind your opinion on the matter is no more authoritative than anyone else's.
What's he going to do? Get a shitty job and earn someone's trust to get his life back on track.
Please explain why you think his unwillingess to do that is the fault of anyone but him (as you attempt to imply in your post). I didn't realize prison had the effect of completely removing a person's work ethic.
And please don't pretend ex-prisoners can't even get shitty jobs, I'd rather not converse with someone who would claim something stupid that.
"thw worst thing you can do is ramp up production and burn through your last remaining drops"
This just isn't accurate ,especially in this case. If the oil were irreplacable, you may have an argument, but it isn't.
As the cost of oil goes up, the financial incentive to use something else increases, while also becoming cost competitive.
If you ration, you create artificial scarcity, but you also remove a major incentive to find alternatives. In addition, and not accidentally IMNSHO, you condition people to live on an energy diet. I'm sure some of you love that idea, but I consider rationing out of necessity a scientific failure.
First, I didn't use an analogy you fuckwit.
Second, way to be a classless twat and call names anonymously, I'm sure whatever stupid justification you use will be good enough for you.
Third, if you use the software and IT FUCKING WORKS THAT is how you know it works. What a moron like you "thinks" about it irrelvant.
I guarantee you right now people are running tiny little apps they threw together and never debugged, but that do the job.
You can "think" they're not working all you like, but you sound like a humongous retard saying so while the apps are chugging away.
Also, using isn't testing. You sound even more retarded not only trying rhis point, but repeating it as though you saying something stupid over and over makes it definitive.
Last, I'm quite happy you think I'm an asshole, I have no patience for idiots like you and even less of a desire to endear myself to you.
Why don't you insult me as an AC again, that was closer to what you have the intelligence for. Leave the rational debate for people who aren't stupid enough to say "Code that works DOESN'T WORK" like you did.
Great offense, you
sound like a fucking imbecile.
"you can't know if a piece of code "works" if you never tested or debugged it"
Hmm, so running the code and seeing it do the job you intendedit for won't tell you it "works"?
OH, YES IT WILL
If i write code that does the job I intended for it, but have never debugged it, you're claiming that's not working code.
That, frankly, is about the dumbest thing I've see posred here, and apart from being logically vacuous ("code that works but hasn't been tested or debugged doesn't work" um, WTF?) it's just wrong.
"You simply cannot "make it work" without researching and understanding the standards. Period"
So a piece of code that does everything it is supposed to with no problems, and works perfectly, but hasn't been debugged or standardized, magically doesn't work because YOU SAY SO?
Sorry, no,that's just moronic on it's face. please don't even attempt to tell me people aren't right now running code that works perfecty but has never been debugged or standardized. Accoring to YOU, that code that is working pwrfectly for them "cannot be made to work". Yet it is.
You simply cannot make your point sound intelligent or correct. Period (see I did what you did so my point is irrefutable now, right?).
Because, even if you got lucky and made no
mistakes, YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THAT UNTIL YOU FACT CHECKED IT, PROOFREAD IT AND EDITED IT. With code, if it works, nothing else is necessary. With code the goal is to work. With texts, the goal is accuracy and clarity which you cannot have without review. Software has NO such requirement, and your attempts to argue otherwise are demonstrably wrong.
Furthermore, you posted AC which is a tacit admission that your point is too stupid to assign your name to.
Even furthermore, calling me an asshole at the end of a post that had virtually no intelligent commentary in it doesn't do anything to change the fact that I'm right, and frankly, if you zealots think I'm an asshole after I've destroyed your delusions about open source software like I did here, then I'll take the insult with pride.
It must suck for you that you're factually wrong AND you proved yourself pathetic in the same post.
Move along AC, we adults are discussing things you've proven you're not smart enough to understand.