Same problem as Voter ID. Simple solution would be an effort to provide everyone with state-issued ID and require its use then we could satisfy both sides, but then we can't have the other side lose. We've gotten to the point where we can't even entertain the thought that the other side of the political spectrum can have a valid concern.
You would think that would be a straightforward question, but it isn't. Probably not like you are expecting. It is a federal crime but most law enforcement you would encounter is state or local. There have been some major concerns over it being a racial issue and the states that have the biggest problem with illegal immigrants committing other crimes have a poor racial track record.
You are doing it wrong. You need to gas them first and then stack them like wood. If you just tube them they will fall where they choose and you can't fill the extra space with cargo.
Let's resetup the big picture. The democrats finally have the political standing to pass the ACA and they do so. More conservative states respond to yet another program with cost from the government and set up half of congress as wanting to undermine the thing. Now the political legacy of a President is riding on getting this thing implemented and enjoyed before the republicans torpedo it. We've now set a hard date on completion and a hard value for quality. The only variable left is cost. This really will define public perception for both parties, so it really isn't an object for the party who wants this thing to succeed.
You must have missed the news. The republicans were willing to shut down the entire government to prevent people from trying it and liking it. We are still trying to get them to pull their heads out and let us get back to business even though they failed. It was highly important to the democratic strategy that everyone gets in as soon as it opens. Giving them a full month to see if their plan worked would have been an even worse disaster. Yep, technically completely boneheaded but you couldn't have done it any other way if you were wanting this to be successful.
If we are to continue to have a peaceful society then a social wage will become necessary, but that is up to the people who have power...which they get from controlling wealth...which they get by optimizing people out of the labor force... Yeah it will probably end up with social and economic destruction before we can rise out of the ashes and progress again.
People want to take and share still images. Instagram didn't replace Kodak by themselves, but they represent a shift in taking and sharing photographs that replaces a lot of skilled and unskilled workers with lots of individual monetary transactions with customers with a few skilled workers with few or no monetary transactions with the customer. Facebook didn't replace Kodak either but in my house it most certainly replaced Kodak and Fujifilm in my house for what I directly used those companies for.
Think that is bad? I had a professor that docked points in a graduate level class for my code overflowing the line on his printouts from my electronic submission. HTH can someone help that?
I wouldn't disagree except the lion's share of expended effort for most students in assembly language is not the foundational concepts of piecing together higher level concepts but struggling with barely legible syntax and only slightly more legible error outputs. Maybe we just had poor choices for assembly processors but the things that were important from that course came through clearer in the microprocessor course.
I worry about your use of the word artificial here. That could lead some to think that they are never valuable for reasoning and cannot be reasoned with, when in fact some of these things must be reasoned with.
Surprise! A significant number of the young hotshot kids that started in the field when it was booming are still at it and now they are approaching middle age and having children. I know we have a reputation, but we do actually form committed relationships and even have sex every once in a while.
Once long ago, Comcast changed my billing date, charged me a month's service fee for a week and a half of actual time and when I asked to have it prorated they told me essentially I could go screw myself. I was in an apartment complex and was not allowed by my lease to have service through anyone else. I have not had Comcast any time I could have a choice not to.
We are getting the Uverse rollout in my neighborhood. You'd think I might know from some advertising email or a mail flyer, but not with AT&T. We found out after several hours on the phone with support about our resulting internet outage, the unnecessary purchase of a new dsl modem, and a in-house visit they threatened to charge us for.
I heard this argument on talk radio this morning. 3% of NASA workers were considered essential ( or maybe 3% of the local workforce). The host said you couldn't run a company with 3% of the employees being essential. Except NASA (at least locally) is pretty much stopping all services except services to the ISS. If you run a company and stop all but the absolute critical services then you very well could end up with 3% or less of your business being "non-critical."
I hate to respond to your rather funny joke with serious stuff, but here goes: You need algorithms that have a success rate not just in accuracy but time. And that time isn't beating a physical or mechanical process, it is beating someone else's algorithm. That really stirs some primal motivational stuff for a lot of males.
There are some pretty interesting technical challenges with HFT and a competitive problem that isn't inherent to most technical problems which tend to often be man versus nature. It could have some appeal. That said, there isn't an amount of money and set of technical challenges interesting enough to make me want to work for that type of management structure and corporate environment.
Login security can be described in a couple of sentences, so it makes it nicely through the chain of command up to people who actually make decisions. A lot of security problems are simplified to just yelling Security! Security! by the time they are filtered to the decision makers.
Slashdot Mirror
Same problem as Voter ID. Simple solution would be an effort to provide everyone with state-issued ID and require its use then we could satisfy both sides, but then we can't have the other side lose. We've gotten to the point where we can't even entertain the thought that the other side of the political spectrum can have a valid concern.
You would think that would be a straightforward question, but it isn't. Probably not like you are expecting. It is a federal crime but most law enforcement you would encounter is state or local. There have been some major concerns over it being a racial issue and the states that have the biggest problem with illegal immigrants committing other crimes have a poor racial track record.
You are doing it wrong. You need to gas them first and then stack them like wood. If you just tube them they will fall where they choose and you can't fill the extra space with cargo.
I didn't really get the vinyl album folks until this very moment.
I'll give you that for most places. My first time to use self-checkout was at Walmart and was so that someone semi-competant was running things.
Let's resetup the big picture. The democrats finally have the political standing to pass the ACA and they do so. More conservative states respond to yet another program with cost from the government and set up half of congress as wanting to undermine the thing. Now the political legacy of a President is riding on getting this thing implemented and enjoyed before the republicans torpedo it. We've now set a hard date on completion and a hard value for quality. The only variable left is cost. This really will define public perception for both parties, so it really isn't an object for the party who wants this thing to succeed.
You must have missed the news. The republicans were willing to shut down the entire government to prevent people from trying it and liking it. We are still trying to get them to pull their heads out and let us get back to business even though they failed. It was highly important to the democratic strategy that everyone gets in as soon as it opens. Giving them a full month to see if their plan worked would have been an even worse disaster. Yep, technically completely boneheaded but you couldn't have done it any other way if you were wanting this to be successful.
If we are to continue to have a peaceful society then a social wage will become necessary, but that is up to the people who have power...which they get from controlling wealth...which they get by optimizing people out of the labor force... Yeah it will probably end up with social and economic destruction before we can rise out of the ashes and progress again.
People want to take and share still images. Instagram didn't replace Kodak by themselves, but they represent a shift in taking and sharing photographs that replaces a lot of skilled and unskilled workers with lots of individual monetary transactions with customers with a few skilled workers with few or no monetary transactions with the customer. Facebook didn't replace Kodak either but in my house it most certainly replaced Kodak and Fujifilm in my house for what I directly used those companies for.
Think that is bad? I had a professor that docked points in a graduate level class for my code overflowing the line on his printouts from my electronic submission. HTH can someone help that?
I wouldn't disagree except the lion's share of expended effort for most students in assembly language is not the foundational concepts of piecing together higher level concepts but struggling with barely legible syntax and only slightly more legible error outputs. Maybe we just had poor choices for assembly processors but the things that were important from that course came through clearer in the microprocessor course.
I worry about your use of the word artificial here. That could lead some to think that they are never valuable for reasoning and cannot be reasoned with, when in fact some of these things must be reasoned with.
Surprise! A significant number of the young hotshot kids that started in the field when it was booming are still at it and now they are approaching middle age and having children. I know we have a reputation, but we do actually form committed relationships and even have sex every once in a while.
Once long ago, Comcast changed my billing date, charged me a month's service fee for a week and a half of actual time and when I asked to have it prorated they told me essentially I could go screw myself. I was in an apartment complex and was not allowed by my lease to have service through anyone else. I have not had Comcast any time I could have a choice not to.
We are getting the Uverse rollout in my neighborhood. You'd think I might know from some advertising email or a mail flyer, but not with AT&T. We found out after several hours on the phone with support about our resulting internet outage, the unnecessary purchase of a new dsl modem, and a in-house visit they threatened to charge us for.
I've never had Time Warner but I've got to say I can't even imagine how that is possible.
I heard this argument on talk radio this morning. 3% of NASA workers were considered essential ( or maybe 3% of the local workforce). The host said you couldn't run a company with 3% of the employees being essential. Except NASA (at least locally) is pretty much stopping all services except services to the ISS. If you run a company and stop all but the absolute critical services then you very well could end up with 3% or less of your business being "non-critical."
If the mother's anything like the description I'd say get the cheapest phone possible because it will be found and destroyed sooner or later.
Yeah. I'm pretty sure the discovery of martian yeast would be big news on its own.
I hate to respond to your rather funny joke with serious stuff, but here goes: You need algorithms that have a success rate not just in accuracy but time. And that time isn't beating a physical or mechanical process, it is beating someone else's algorithm. That really stirs some primal motivational stuff for a lot of males.
Well I'm not sure how I would have modded my own post but funny isn't exactly the reaction that I had to the article.
There are some pretty interesting technical challenges with HFT and a competitive problem that isn't inherent to most technical problems which tend to often be man versus nature. It could have some appeal. That said, there isn't an amount of money and set of technical challenges interesting enough to make me want to work for that type of management structure and corporate environment.
Apparently they make life possible because they move capital where it is needs to be, and deserve the medal of honor for what they graciously give the rest of us. http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/99-owe-debt-gratitude-1-harry-binswanger-153327379.html
Login security can be described in a couple of sentences, so it makes it nicely through the chain of command up to people who actually make decisions. A lot of security problems are simplified to just yelling Security! Security! by the time they are filtered to the decision makers.
Who wants car duty when you can grope passengers?