I think he meant for transfer, use Ethernet, 802.11, or Bluetooth; and store the pics internally on some kind of storage such as solid state or mech hard drives.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
The reason that digital backs are so expensive (IIRC) is that no body makes square CCDs, and the hasselblad takes square pictures. For studio use, consider a product I got an ad for in the mail (I forgot the name, but I'll look it up if anyone asks me to) that looks like a laptop with a big lens on the front. You plug it into your studio's network and take pictures with it. Something like 4+ megapixel, good enough to make a flawless 18x20. Each pic is about 11megs, uncompressed.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
Slashdot Mirror
He'd have to wait seven years, though.
-----
What if you did detect a signal, and it said "gets your message out to 25 million email addresses! Unlimited Income opportunity!!!"? Then what?
-----
Yeah, but let's see you play MP3s directly from that tape.
I think he meant for transfer, use Ethernet, 802.11, or Bluetooth; and store the pics internally on some kind of storage such as solid state or mech hard drives.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
The reason that digital backs are so expensive (IIRC) is that no body makes square CCDs, and the hasselblad takes square pictures. For studio use, consider a product I got an ad for in the mail (I forgot the name, but I'll look it up if anyone asks me to) that looks like a laptop with a big lens on the front. You plug it into your studio's network and take pictures with it. Something like 4+ megapixel, good enough to make a flawless 18x20. Each pic is about 11megs, uncompressed.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
I tend to get about 4-6 hours of ontime with Lithium-Ion batteries.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
I'd rather go with 20 miles of CAT5.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
never mind.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
Here's some more stuff: http://www.ti.com/dlp/products/cinema/
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
It uses TI's Digital Light Processors. here's TI's press release: http://www.ti.com/dlp/resources/spotlight/
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
Meanwhile, the movie screen is blue...
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
Yeah, what do you want?
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
It's a 90 minute movie... it takes four hours to download... figure it out yourself.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
No, the task is still spread out on eight cpus or however many there are.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
Blade Inertia: throught a fight, the inertia of a blade's motion resists maneuvering. This is a very significant factor in the overall fight.
The blade of a Light saber has no mass.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
Arrgh, now you tell me. I was using mint flavoured dental floss. darn.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
179x64x2-8, depending on the program
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
Go with an 89.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
I'm not sure how they'd use two display planes, one behind the other, to make something look 3d.
That's how the real world works.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
rrrrrrrrr....
That was a low down dirty trick. I'm not really worried about my karma, I'm just mad that now everyone knows I use Windows 98 and IE!
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
I might be wrong, but I believe that blank LCD pixel is clear.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
Imagine if you move a window over another window and it physically moves closer to you. _That_ would be cool.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
I want to know how far apart the layers are.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
"Hey, buddy, my eyes are down here!"
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.
It's not being slashdotted, if MS is doing it then it's being ceecolonslashed.
Don't criticise someone who is attempting to use free software for not using enough free software.