I personally would like to see a Secret of Mana sequel on Gamecube.
FF is a great series but secret of mana sure is fun too. Especially if they beefed up the mutliplayer support some more.
I've got a translated rom of SOM2 for an SNES emulator and it's great fun. I can't believe they never released it here. I guess they didn't have the time or resources to put into it.
The poor guy is color blind and doesn't even know!
on
Iris Indigo Case Mod
·
· Score: 1, Offtopic
Think about how many companies form as little one or two man shops that have great ideas.
Sure they have bugs and security holes and hopefully they're fixed before any damage is done, but to sue a small shop a million dollars because you didn't test something you installed on production servers is a joke.
Instead, you could pay another company to test your security all the way around including all software installed on a server.
Also, if there were something that says the software maker is liable, open source should be exempt as everyone has the oppourtunity to review exactly what the code does or doesn't do.
Do you seriously think that spam is coming from ancient linux distributions?
No way... It's come from brand new machines with dual processors and half a gig of ram that are ready to process a LOT of email.
These people aren't being exploited with open relays... Some are but most aren't. They're being paid to place open relays out there.
What do they care, American businesses want to pay them to spam Americans. Many of them don't even like Americans anyway.
Asian ISPs don't care or we would have heard from them by now.
Blacklisting Asia is not such a bad idea. The biggest problem with blacklisting asia is all the people that won't unblacklist them if they get their problem fixed.
They are able to setup linux and configure sendmail and bind to add additional relays without instructions in their native language but they can't figure out how to turn them off or install a more recent version of sendmail??
You want me to pay for a translator to contact a bunch of deadbeat sysadmins that aren't going to care if I complain or not because they leave their systems open to make money?
Umm... No. If you know anyone that will translate to Chinese for free let me know. I'd like to send some explitives.
I'm really surprised the Chinese Government hasn't shut down freaking china-net. Does anyone have any evidence of any sort of steganography being used by the Chinese?
I'm even more surprised that all the users of this site haven't put together some decent specs for a smarter email server. There are a couple of halfway solutions out there but we need something good. I guess I'll have to do it myself.
Microsoft has now put security priority #1 and I don't know what that's worth, but I would bet that they're going to start getting away from running everything as "root" on the latest and greatest MS OS.
Having Lindows log in as root and run everything as root is backwards. At a minimum, create users that have near root access but not EVERYTHING.
It seems like the time spent developing this "piece of art" could be better spent writing documentation and GPL software to manage linux for dummies.
Then there wouldn't even be a need to run Windows software.
He didn't realize he was using a 2.4 GHz cordless mouse 10 miles from the actual computer and someone had hooked up a giant hidden power supply inside the mouse.
No wonder it's burning his hand! It could burn trees down if they were between him and the receiver!
I hate AOL as much as the next person, but for all you Netscape fans out there, if it weren't for AOL, netscape would not be around. (This would actually have been a blessing to those of us developing websites.)
AOL has a lot of money. Who's to say that they won't offer Alan an agreement such as, "We won't interfere or tell you what to do, we'll simply keep paying your bills."
Maybe even give Alan more resources than he currently has to get things done.
I thought linux was suppossed to be for the openminded person who can think past windows. Shouldn't the development be the same way?
If China sets up it's own root servers, I'll be the first to have my mail server do a lookup to see if the root server of the sender exists in China to block access.
I submitted this to askSlashdot and it's also in my journal entries, but shouldn't cauce.org have some proposed solutions to ending the spam problem? As in, laws that they think would actually work to benefit consumers, or mail server specs that would actually work to stop spam?
It will add the following to our existing laws:
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 1042
91ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY
INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVES BEARDEN (Sponsor), KING, LEVIN, WILSON (42), DOLAN,
HUNTER, CRAWFORD, REINHART, MOORE, OSTMANN, HEGEMAN, MYERS AND CUNNINGHAM.
Pre-filed December 3, 2001, and 1000 copies ordered printed.
TED WEDEL, Chief Clerk
2584L.01I
AN ACT
To amend chapter 407, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to unsolicited electronic messages.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 407, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 407.1125, to read as follows:
407.1125. 1. No person may initiate the transmission, conspire with another to initiate the transmission, or assist the transmission of a commercial electronic mail message from a computer located in Missouri or to an electronic mail address that the sender knows, or has reason to know, is held by a Missouri resident that:
(1) Uses a third-party's Internet domain name without permission of the third party, or otherwise misrepresents or obscures any information in identifying the point of origin or the transmission path of a commercial electronic mail message; or
(2) Contains false or misleading information in the subject line.
2. For purposes of this section, a person knows that the intended recipient of a commercial electronic mail message is a Missouri resident if that information is available, upon request, from the registrant of the Internet domain name contained in the recipient's electronic mail address.
http://us.imdb.com/Title?0069005
They can have their fun now... But what will they do when the big ones come?
IBM Info about porting OS/2 to linux
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/esdd/articles/linux_c .html?t=gr,l=805,p=OS2toLinux
This was posted on slashdot not so long ago.
Let us know his name and address. Is he really your friend if he's doing that crap?
Let us know the client companies name and address.
I personally would like to see a Secret of Mana sequel on Gamecube.
FF is a great series but secret of mana sure is fun too. Especially if they beefed up the mutliplayer support some more.
I've got a translated rom of SOM2 for an SNES emulator and it's great fun. I can't believe they never released it here. I guess they didn't have the time or resources to put into it.
That case doesn't match the iomega casing.
It's too much liability on small companies...
Think about how many companies form as little one or two man shops that have great ideas.
Sure they have bugs and security holes and hopefully they're fixed before any damage is done, but to sue a small shop a million dollars because you didn't test something you installed on production servers is a joke.
Instead, you could pay another company to test your security all the way around including all software installed on a server.
Also, if there were something that says the software maker is liable, open source should be exempt as everyone has the oppourtunity to review exactly what the code does or doesn't do.
Do you seriously think that spam is coming from ancient linux distributions?
No way... It's come from brand new machines with dual processors and half a gig of ram that are ready to process a LOT of email.
These people aren't being exploited with open relays... Some are but most aren't. They're being paid to place open relays out there.
What do they care, American businesses want to pay them to spam Americans. Many of them don't even like Americans anyway.
Asian ISPs don't care or we would have heard from them by now.
Blacklisting Asia is not such a bad idea. The biggest problem with blacklisting asia is all the people that won't unblacklist them if they get their problem fixed.
They are able to setup linux and configure sendmail and bind to add additional relays without instructions in their native language but they can't figure out how to turn them off or install a more recent version of sendmail??
Something stinks like chinese fish!
Thanks for the idea.
Does anyone have an IP range that will block most of China?
You want me to pay for a translator to contact a bunch of deadbeat sysadmins that aren't going to care if I complain or not because they leave their systems open to make money?
Umm... No. If you know anyone that will translate to Chinese for free let me know. I'd like to send some explitives.
I'm really surprised the Chinese Government hasn't shut down freaking china-net. Does anyone have any evidence of any sort of steganography being used by the Chinese?
I'm even more surprised that all the users of this site haven't put together some decent specs for a smarter email server. There are a couple of halfway solutions out there but we need something good. I guess I'll have to do it myself.
We should have hunting parties and every 3rd tuesday of the month go hunting down spammers and beat the tar out of them...
Oooooh ohhhhhh Ahhhhhhhhh ahhhhh!
I got much more info back than him. Just have to use the correct whois server.
Registrant:
vx2 (VX52-DOM)
po box 27103
Las Vegas, NV 89126
US
Domain Name: VX2.CC
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Billing Contact:
vx2 (D25000-OR) vx2org@hotmail.com
vx2
po box 27103
Las Vegas, NV 89126
US
212 255 1008 fax: 123 123 1234
Record last updated on 05-Oct-2001.
Record expires on 31-Jul-2003.
Record created on 31-Jul-2001.
Database last updated on 26-Jan-2002 12:04:00 EST.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.VX2.CC207.246.124.6
NS2.VX2.CC207.246.124.7
Microsoft has now put security priority #1 and I don't know what that's worth, but I would bet that they're going to start getting away from running everything as "root" on the latest and greatest MS OS.
Having Lindows log in as root and run everything as root is backwards. At a minimum, create users that have near root access but not EVERYTHING.
It seems like the time spent developing this "piece of art" could be better spent writing documentation and GPL software to manage linux for dummies.
Then there wouldn't even be a need to run Windows software.
It wouldn't be spam without using an overseas mail server to send it from.
He didn't realize he was using a 2.4 GHz cordless mouse 10 miles from the actual computer and someone had hooked up a giant hidden power supply inside the mouse.
No wonder it's burning his hand! It could burn trees down if they were between him and the receiver!
That's just plain and simple narrowminded.
I hate AOL as much as the next person, but for all you Netscape fans out there, if it weren't for AOL, netscape would not be around. (This would actually have been a blessing to those of us developing websites.)
AOL has a lot of money. Who's to say that they won't offer Alan an agreement such as, "We won't interfere or tell you what to do, we'll simply keep paying your bills."
Maybe even give Alan more resources than he currently has to get things done.
I thought linux was suppossed to be for the openminded person who can think past windows. Shouldn't the development be the same way?
Wouldn't that mean that the FBI would have to open all of it's source code to anyone.
It has it's advantages but it also has it's disadvantages if that's the case.
Tell people you're all for sending spammers to hell. I'd vote for you.
If China sets up it's own root servers, I'll be the first to have my mail server do a lookup to see if the root server of the sender exists in China to block access.
That will give me about 95% more bandwidth.
I submitted this to askSlashdot and it's also in my journal entries, but shouldn't cauce.org have some proposed solutions to ending the spam problem? As in, laws that they think would actually work to benefit consumers, or mail server specs that would actually work to stop spam?
I personally really enjoyed Unreal and Unreal Tournament. Both ran well on low end machines. Both run great on high end machines.
It's my understanding that the new games all have a totally redone scripting engine.
Does anyone know for sure?
http://www.spamlaws.com/state/mo.html
1 04 2.HTM
I'm also working with State Rep. Carl Bearden to get our laws up to par with Washington State's laws.
http://www.house.state.mo.us/bills02/bills02/HB
It will add the following to our existing laws:
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 1042
91ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY
INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVES BEARDEN (Sponsor), KING, LEVIN, WILSON (42), DOLAN,
HUNTER, CRAWFORD, REINHART, MOORE, OSTMANN, HEGEMAN, MYERS AND CUNNINGHAM.
Pre-filed December 3, 2001, and 1000 copies ordered printed.
TED WEDEL, Chief Clerk
2584L.01I
AN ACT
To amend chapter 407, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to unsolicited electronic messages.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 407, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 407.1125, to read as follows:
407.1125. 1. No person may initiate the transmission, conspire with another to initiate the transmission, or assist the transmission of a commercial electronic mail message from a computer located in Missouri or to an electronic mail address that the sender knows, or has reason to know, is held by a Missouri resident that:
(1) Uses a third-party's Internet domain name without permission of the third party, or otherwise misrepresents or obscures any information in identifying the point of origin or the transmission path of a commercial electronic mail message; or
(2) Contains false or misleading information in the subject line.
2. For purposes of this section, a person knows that the intended recipient of a commercial electronic mail message is a Missouri resident if that information is available, upon request, from the registrant of the Internet domain name contained in the recipient's electronic mail address.