Iran doesn't recognize Israel as a nation so obviously there isn't going to be a single word about "nation" or "state". Iran uses the terms "Zionist regime" and "occupied Palestine" to reference the nation of Israel. They know that, Israel knows that, everyone except apparently you knows that.
And no I didn't use bombing and invading as positive examples of how to deal with unfriendly states - again you are making that up.
Your claim is "The Darwin kernel sources were at one time removed from the available downloads". The other claim is that there's just a lag on initially adding new versions and nothing was removed.
Your claim can be shown by just giving one example of the kernel sources being removed after they were made available.
The other claim would require showing that every day/hour/minute/second/whatever-time-frame-suffices the sources that were previously available were still available.
I'm not sure how you can think the second is eaeier to do than the first.
Yes I also read "Zionist Regime of Israel" as a synonym for "state of Israel". And "wipe of the map" doesn't apply to regime change anyway - since the map stays the same. Hoping the destruction of a democratic government and it's replacement with something else is not the same as hoping for a nation to be wiped off the map.
And no I didn't say that dropping bombs on another sovereign state is not such a big deal. You made that up completely out of thin air.
Yes "wiped off the map" and "destruction" I consider synonyms.
And do you have any citations for claims of destruction the other way?
Sure Iran has said they'll bomb Iranian nuclear facilities if push comes to shove, but that's not a statement about removing Iran from the map. IIsrael didn't remove Iraq from the map when they did exactly that to Iraqi nuclear facilities after all.
And the US has talked about using military force against Iran - but again the US did that with Iraq too and maybe you haven't noticed by even after invading Iraq years ago Iraq is still "on the map".
None of that has anything to do with the claim that the leaders of Iran never said such a thing and it was all a bad translation jumped on by Fox News. But I guess moving the goal posts is the only option.
Also since Israel doesn't admit to having tactical nuclear bombs in the first place, claiming they are continuously debating and contemplating using them is just ludicrous.
That's a given obviously. But the teacher's job involves getting the students to do the work and they are paid for that - the students on the other hand are required by law to be in the class and aren't being paid to do so.
Of course in that particular case one of the students ended up in the top 1% of the country in their final school exam and got a degree in pure mathematics afterwards, while the other merely ended up middle of the pack in the advanced math course and went on to do IT sysadmin work.
If people are allergic to a shrub or a cactus being in the same room as them, then bad luck for them they can live in the plastic bubble they must be in when getting to and from school anyway (and everytime someone opens a door or window).
That's fine but the question wasn't about "your wife" it was about "a woman". Lots of people couldn't give a shit about environmental damage and human rights abuses and neither do lots of women.
Yeah you'd have to be an idiot (such as myself) to not see the obvious:
m1 is the mass of the planet. m2 is the mass of the satellite. F = G.m1.m2/r^2 * Thanks Newton. F = m2.a * Thanks Newton again
m2.a = G.m1.m2/r^2 a = G.m1/r^2 m1 = a.r^2/G
Since we know G and the orbit of the satellite gives us r and a we can determine m1. Of course since the orbit isn't going to be a perfect circle there's some details I can't be bothered to think about:)
"a specific disadvantage" and "a LONG TERM REASON" are very different.
Your words are general and hedged. The original claims are specific and set in stone.
I agree, here is likely some reason animals aren't supercharged like this already - most likely in my mind would be energy requirements (weaker but needing less food leads to better survival than stronger but needing more food) but I know nothing about the specifics or if there are even additional energy needs.
We "weigh" planets by observing the gravitational force acting on a space craft (whose mass we know) we send close to them. Or by measuring the mass of something else (say by observing a space craft near it) and then observing how it interacts gravitationaly with the planet in question.
You can also do some math with pulsar timings to see periodic errors due to the barycenter of the solar system not being exactly where you thought - which will also give you the planetary masses (well the planet plus the moons,etc). But I only saw a paper on it I didn't understand it or anything crazy like that.
"reason" wasn't the problematic term, "designed" was, as in "... the body's designed to...".
It is not designed to do anything, because it isn't designed in the first place.
However, even the reason part is crap. "There must be a reason, a LONG TERM REASON" is just plain wrong.
Evolution makes no claims of optimal outcomes in the first place.
Maybe said mutation just never happened in the wild? Maybe the disadvantages it also produced are no longer disadvantages due to environmental changes or other genome changes? Maybe it doesn't actually give an advantage to survival or reproduction? Maybe is requires more energy input which is bad in the short term? Maybe there's one of a million other short term disadvantages that don't apply in a lab setting.
Assuming it must be bad is the antithesis of evolution - a theory in which the core concept is that such a change might be beneficial.
If you have nothing to hide then you are not human...
If you have nothing to hide :
Why do you have curtains?
I don't. I do have blinds which is the same idea.
I have them to block the sunlight from washing out various LCD displays.
Why do wear clothes?
A few reasons.
Too keep warm.
Also it seems more hygenic to have something between my ass and the couch, given other people sit on the same couch.
There's also social/legal reasons. Doing the grocery shopping without clothes would end with me in jail. Inflicting the viewing of my fat ass on other people would also go against social conventions and offend (or at least disgust) other people.
Why don't you video your entire life and broadcast it online...?...because you do have something to hide : a private life
Because that would be effort on my part and I see no benefit in doing so.
And other people bought netbooks because they were cheaper. They wanted something portable to browse the web/email but didn't want to spend lots of money. As laptops also came down to $250 they buy them instead of a netbook. The sales figures make that pretty obvious.
For the advantage comparison. If there were no netbooks in existance at all would you have taken a laptop on your trip abroad? What about laptops like the 11" MacBook air? If you were rich enough to be able to afford to lose it? Now you mightn't, but some people would.
Now I use a laptop on short trips. If there were no laptops would anyone bring a desktop on the train? I'm going to go out on a limb and say *nobody* would bring a desktop to use on their train commute, if they couldn't bring a laptop for some reason.
Thus the difference between a laptop and a netbook isn't as large as the difference between a laptop and a desktop.
Nobody (well I'm not, I'm sure there's an idiot somewhere) is saying netbooks are useless. Nobody is saying they don't have advantages over laptops. All that is claimed is that they have fewer advantages relative to laptops than laptops have relative to desktops.
Slashdot Mirror
So what? GPS satellites aren't in geosynchronous orbit anyway making that a completely irrelevant point.
GPS orbits are completely unsuitable for spy satellites sure, but not for that reason.
Iran doesn't recognize Israel as a nation so obviously there isn't going to be a single word about "nation" or "state". Iran uses the terms "Zionist regime" and "occupied Palestine" to reference the nation of Israel. They know that, Israel knows that, everyone except apparently you knows that.
And no I didn't use bombing and invading as positive examples of how to deal with unfriendly states - again you are making that up.
Your claim is "The Darwin kernel sources were at one time removed from the available downloads". The other claim is that there's just a lag on initially adding new versions and nothing was removed.
Your claim can be shown by just giving one example of the kernel sources being removed after they were made available.
The other claim would require showing that every day/hour/minute/second/whatever-time-frame-suffices the sources that were previously available were still available.
I'm not sure how you can think the second is eaeier to do than the first.
Yes I also read "Zionist Regime of Israel" as a synonym for "state of Israel". And "wipe of the map" doesn't apply to regime change anyway - since the map stays the same. Hoping the destruction of a democratic government and it's replacement with something else is not the same as hoping for a nation to be wiped off the map.
And no I didn't say that dropping bombs on another sovereign state is not such a big deal. You made that up completely out of thin air.
Yes "wiped off the map" and "destruction" I consider synonyms.
And do you have any citations for claims of destruction the other way?
Sure Iran has said they'll bomb Iranian nuclear facilities if push comes to shove, but that's not a statement about removing Iran from the map. IIsrael didn't remove Iraq from the map when they did exactly that to Iraqi nuclear facilities after all.
And the US has talked about using military force against Iran - but again the US did that with Iraq too and maybe you haven't noticed by even after invading Iraq years ago Iraq is still "on the map".
None of that has anything to do with the claim that the leaders of Iran never said such a thing and it was all a bad translation jumped on by Fox News. But I guess moving the goal posts is the only option.
Also since Israel doesn't admit to having tactical nuclear bombs in the first place, claiming they are continuously debating and contemplating using them is just ludicrous.
You would think they'd fix the translation. But no, years later we still have:
http://www.president.ir/en/10114
Or are you claiming Fox news runs the Iranian President's web site?
That's a given obviously. But the teacher's job involves getting the students to do the work and they are paid for that - the students on the other hand are required by law to be in the class and aren't being paid to do so.
Of course in that particular case one of the students ended up in the top 1% of the country in their final school exam and got a degree in pure mathematics afterwards, while the other merely ended up middle of the pack in the advanced math course and went on to do IT sysadmin work.
The presents under your christmas tree must look really pretty. Plain brown boxes and all.
in our math class.
That didn't really say much about whether grid paper and pens were aiding or hindering our education.
It possibly does say something about the quality of the teacher...
I'm going to punt at fewer than the number of christians who bought stuff without gift wrapping and then wrapped it themselves.
So don't use a flowering plant...
If people are allergic to a shrub or a cactus being in the same room as them, then bad luck for them they can live in the plastic bubble they must be in when getting to and from school anyway (and everytime someone opens a door or window).
Yes, because there are no private companies that hire IT staff. None at all.
My job is a figment of my imagination or something.
Exactly. You'd be disappointed because you would expect it to be a photo from space, showing that there is no need for the ellipsis and qualifier.
And a plugin to do that isn't an Add-On, because?
That's fine but the question wasn't about "your wife" it was about "a woman". Lots of people couldn't give a shit about environmental damage and human rights abuses and neither do lots of women.
That's the point.
That isn't what was removed. What was removed was a security flaw that let a non-root app running on the device get root priveledges.
Because they sparkle, something which most people consider pretty (hence the use of things that sparkle in lots of decorative items).
Yeah you'd have to be an idiot (such as myself) to not see the obvious:
m1 is the mass of the planet. m2 is the mass of the satellite.
F = G.m1.m2/r^2 * Thanks Newton.
F = m2.a * Thanks Newton again
m2.a = G.m1.m2/r^2
a = G.m1/r^2
m1 = a.r^2/G
Since we know G and the orbit of the satellite gives us r and a we can determine m1. Of course since the orbit isn't going to be a perfect circle there's some details I can't be bothered to think about :)
"likely" and "must be" are very different.
"a specific disadvantage" and "a LONG TERM REASON" are very different.
Your words are general and hedged. The original claims are specific and set in stone.
I agree, here is likely some reason animals aren't supercharged like this already - most likely in my mind would be energy requirements (weaker but needing less food leads to better survival than stronger but needing more food) but I know nothing about the specifics or if there are even additional energy needs.
Nope.
We "weigh" planets by observing the gravitational force acting on a space craft (whose mass we know) we send close to them. Or by measuring the mass of something else (say by observing a space craft near it) and then observing how it interacts gravitationaly with the planet in question.
You can also do some math with pulsar timings to see periodic errors due to the barycenter of the solar system not being exactly where you thought - which will also give you the planetary masses (well the planet plus the moons,etc). But I only saw a paper on it I didn't understand it or anything crazy like that.
"reason" wasn't the problematic term, "designed" was, as in "... the body's designed to ...".
It is not designed to do anything, because it isn't designed in the first place.
However, even the reason part is crap. "There must be a reason, a LONG TERM REASON" is just plain wrong.
Evolution makes no claims of optimal outcomes in the first place.
Maybe said mutation just never happened in the wild? Maybe the disadvantages it also produced are no longer disadvantages due to environmental changes or other genome changes? Maybe it doesn't actually give an advantage to survival or reproduction? Maybe is requires more energy input which is bad in the short term? Maybe there's one of a million other short term disadvantages that don't apply in a lab setting.
Assuming it must be bad is the antithesis of evolution - a theory in which the core concept is that such a change might be beneficial.
I don't. I do have blinds which is the same idea.
I have them to block the sunlight from washing out various LCD displays.
A few reasons.
Too keep warm.
Also it seems more hygenic to have something between my ass and the couch, given other people sit on the same couch.
There's also social/legal reasons. Doing the grocery shopping without clothes would end with me in jail. Inflicting the viewing of my fat ass on other people would also go against social conventions and offend (or at least disgust) other people.
Because that would be effort on my part and I see no benefit in doing so.
A macbook air weighs 1kg and is 30x20x2cm. Surely that's small and light enough?
And other people bought netbooks because they were cheaper. They wanted something portable to browse the web/email but didn't want to spend lots of money. As laptops also came down to $250 they buy them instead of a netbook. The sales figures make that pretty obvious.
For the advantage comparison. If there were no netbooks in existance at all would you have taken a laptop on your trip abroad? What about laptops like the 11" MacBook air? If you were rich enough to be able to afford to lose it? Now you mightn't, but some people would.
Now I use a laptop on short trips. If there were no laptops would anyone bring a desktop on the train? I'm going to go out on a limb and say *nobody* would bring a desktop to use on their train commute, if they couldn't bring a laptop for some reason.
Thus the difference between a laptop and a netbook isn't as large as the difference between a laptop and a desktop.
Nobody (well I'm not, I'm sure there's an idiot somewhere) is saying netbooks are useless. Nobody is saying they don't have advantages over laptops. All that is claimed is that they have fewer advantages relative to laptops than laptops have relative to desktops.