Below we look more closely at the companies which are employing kernel developers. For each developer, corporate affiliation was obtained through one or more of: (1) the use of company email addresses, (2) sponsorship information included in the code they submit, or (3) simply asking the developers directly. The numbers presented are necessarily approximate; developers occasionally change employers, and they may do personal work out of the office. But they will be close enough to support a number of conclusions.
So clearly using a company email address is enough to qualify - of course they might do some extra checking, but that checking is more likely to happen the other way I would suspect (I know Bill, and sure he never mentions it but he FooBar Corp pays him for his kernel work).
But since there methodology was garbage all that means is that someone using a Volkswagen email address wrote some code.
It says nothing about whether it was done as part of their employment with Volkswagen, or whether it was done out of business hours while hiding in their parent's basement.
Just like the CO2 we remove from under the ground by burning fossil fuels will eventually return through the same process that put it there in the first place.
Nuclear is the obvious thing, they aren't going to mention that because people still freak out and they lose the "green cred" they are trying to build.
And getting job, renting a house, and the numerous other things that do stupid credit checks.
I'm not saying you are liable for such debts, but you have to go through exactly the same hassle as those who do use credit in order to get them off your credit history.
So you argument against soviet "tech" sucking is that they were dumb enough to not notice that one of their physicist/mathematicians had laid out a great way to do stealth and instead of doing it let the Americans stumble across his work 20 years later and do it.
That seems like an argument against their "tech" if anything.
It's got nothing to do with safety. It's just technology.
But muting the phone is encouraging talking on it while driving and at the same time making the driving part harder.
Similarly with the iphone and turning the entire map off on a call.
It's the way the devices work and they both seem stupid. Then again I'd rather my devices didn't stop me doing stupid things when I want to.
I don't drive as car at all, so driving while on the phone is obviously something I have never done. But it's completely irrelevant to the point that was being discussed, well until the moralist arrived anyway.
Some people aren't completely socially inept and have other people in the car with them who can answer the damn phone pretty safely.
Others have these magical devices called hands-free-kits which let them legally (but not much more safely) answer the phone while driving. Others are in jurisdictions where using a phone while driving is perfectly legal (not anymore safely of course).
Again, what is the point of the phone muting the GPS navigator other than making talking on it while driving easier?
Seriously if you think no one in the world talks on a phone while driving or has a passenger answer their phone while driving you are epically stupid.
But there was more than just "fair". There was also your game not being robbed by guys with guns who heard about it somehow. Which could also happen at a casino, but the security is better and there's juicier targets than the poker table.
The real scam is the poker tables. The casino risks none of its own money on the poker tables, yet feels entitled to a percentage of every pot? WTF?
The provide a nice playing table and chairs. They provide nice cards and chips. They provide a dealer who vaguely knows the rules. They provide a public location with security to find people to play with without having to sit in a private location with strangers and large sums of money. They provide an unbiased party for dispute resolution.
And they don't always feel entitled to a percentage of every pot, pay by the hour isn't that uncommon.
If wikipedia is good enough for you then that very same article you quoted from also says:
"There are also arguments which link monetarism and macroeconomics, and treat monetarism as a special case of Keynesian theory."
Monetarism is about using monetary policy to manipulate the economy. High rates to slow growth in booms and low rates to reduce busts. Keynesian is about using fiscal policy to manipulate the economy. Spend less/tax more to slow growth in the booms and spend more/tex less to reduce busts.
Yes there is more to it. But when the topic area as interference versus non-interference they are both so similar the differences don't matter.
Slashdot Mirror
http://opensource.org/docs/osd
There's quite a few more requirements than just having the code be available.
I don't care at all, since it's irrelevant.
But feel free to fixate on the details of the plucked out of the air company name.
Whereas I'll instead trust what they wrote:
So clearly using a company email address is enough to qualify - of course they might do some extra checking, but that checking is more likely to happen the other way I would suspect (I know Bill, and sure he never mentions it but he FooBar Corp pays him for his kernel work).
Because you should be able to buy fire insurance after your house burns down.
Do you have the slightest clue how insurance works?
But since there methodology was garbage all that means is that someone using a Volkswagen email address wrote some code.
It says nothing about whether it was done as part of their employment with Volkswagen, or whether it was done out of business hours while hiding in their parent's basement.
It's not about global warming, that's just the feel good spin put on it for the greenies.
It's about an aircraft carrier that does not need to be resupplied with jet fuel when the shooting has started.
Now if they could just work out munitions and food...
Just like the CO2 we remove from under the ground by burning fossil fuels will eventually return through the same process that put it there in the first place.
Nuclear is the obvious thing, they aren't going to mention that because people still freak out and they lose the "green cred" they are trying to build.
Cool!
I'm guessing my zombie invasion defenses won't really work so well against these robots, oh well back to the drawing board.
And getting job, renting a house, and the numerous other things that do stupid credit checks.
I'm not saying you are liable for such debts, but you have to go through exactly the same hassle as those who do use credit in order to get them off your credit history.
Not using debt doesn't help when the idiots are assigning someone else's debt to you...
It's not a lie. It's trying not to attract others to the "food" you found.
So more hiding.
Which is what I said, but without the stupid hinting because I'm too embarrassed of being wrong to state what I think.
So you argument against soviet "tech" sucking is that they were dumb enough to not notice that one of their physicist/mathematicians had laid out a great way to do stealth and instead of doing it let the Americans stumble across his work 20 years later and do it.
That seems like an argument against their "tech" if anything.
It's got nothing to do with safety. It's just technology.
But muting the phone is encouraging talking on it while driving and at the same time making the driving part harder.
Similarly with the iphone and turning the entire map off on a call.
It's the way the devices work and they both seem stupid. Then again I'd rather my devices didn't stop me doing stupid things when I want to.
I don't drive as car at all, so driving while on the phone is obviously something I have never done. But it's completely irrelevant to the point that was being discussed, well until the moralist arrived anyway.
What the fuck does that have to do with someone providing links with only acronyms in the comments?
Some people aren't completely socially inept and have other people in the car with them who can answer the damn phone pretty safely.
Others have these magical devices called hands-free-kits which let them legally (but not much more safely) answer the phone while driving. Others are in jurisdictions where using a phone while driving is perfectly legal (not anymore safely of course).
Again, what is the point of the phone muting the GPS navigator other than making talking on it while driving easier?
Seriously if you think no one in the world talks on a phone while driving or has a passenger answer their phone while driving you are epically stupid.
single player RPGs are unrelated to MMO games.
Because that's what phones are for.
Because you might actually want to know about the freeway exit you needed to take when someone called to ask when you were arriving.
You might like the volume off, I'm sure other people don't and yet more other people don't want the map to vanish.
Because the links in the summary were so hard to understand...
But there was more than just "fair". There was also your game not being robbed by guys with guns who heard about it somehow. Which could also happen at a casino, but the security is better and there's juicier targets than the poker table.
The provide a nice playing table and chairs. They provide nice cards and chips. They provide a dealer who vaguely knows the rules. They provide a public location with security to find people to play with without having to sit in a private location with strangers and large sums of money. They provide an unbiased party for dispute resolution.
And they don't always feel entitled to a percentage of every pot, pay by the hour isn't that uncommon.
We also only allow people to buy a six-pack of beer a week, right?
And only jog 30 minutes a day?
And only eat 1 chocolate bar every 2 days?
And only watch TV for 2 hours a day?
If wikipedia is good enough for you then that very same article you quoted from also says:
"There are also arguments which link monetarism and macroeconomics, and treat monetarism as a special case of Keynesian theory."
Monetarism is about using monetary policy to manipulate the economy. High rates to slow growth in booms and low rates to reduce busts. Keynesian is about using fiscal policy to manipulate the economy. Spend less/tax more to slow growth in the booms and spend more/tex less to reduce busts.
Yes there is more to it. But when the topic area as interference versus non-interference they are both so similar the differences don't matter.