>That is why we don't have computer-piloted cars/planes/etc.
planes? sure??
on modern planes the pilots mainly program the FMS (flight management system) and talk to the human controllers and human passengers...
the flying itself - and avoiding a ton of human errors during this - is mainly done by computers. actually including for example virtually all of the landing process. heck, most pilots get a little distressed, if they have to do a manual approach, as they lack the routine.
of course, they'd take the blame for any incident (compare to Turkish Airlines Flight 1951. bottom line is the computer grounded the plane, as it was trying to land it well before the airport, because of a defective altitude sensor. guilty? not Boeing, but the two pilots not noticing the wrong behavior of the computer.
the same would apply for the car controlling bot. a driver in charge is still mandatory. they take the blame for those 500 accidents - but still the major part of the 10k will be avoided.
assisting systems in cars will be increasing significantly over the next decade.
Yes, I fancy the idea of having RFID readers in the hands of millions and credit card / biometric passport reading software right there at the app-store.
No irony. There's NOTHING that makes (insecure) RFID vanish faster from cc/passports!
I very much fancy the idea with different icons for different error messages. It does improve the recognition of 'something special going on', as I can say from some pretty small samples where I could test that.
Two downsides remained: a) Users DID (as they reported later) recognize a special message ('with that picture of a puppy') being presented. But they did not get the message at all (reading - understanding - correcting the problem wasn't improved) b) The more different icons got involved, the more people just got confused. They just thought of the application as 'a little bit' funny
What got me better results is incorporating the error message into the actual working ui. Think of red boxes around fields that are not properly filled. Say if they break something while entering some customer data, let the whole customer data form turn angry-red or mildly-orange - or maybe just parts.
Highlight broken parts where they should go and fix something. They would only do it, if it got some value for them. If they are responsible for a customer telephone number to be correct, they'd care about a red phone number field. Otherwise they wouldn't.
If they want to go online with their wi-fi, they will care about a red wi-fi icon.
So my advice: Don't distract with (unrelated) icons, pictures or error messages as a whole. You already got their attention on the subject that matters to them. Tell them in an easy and intuitive pattern (traffic light color) if that's ok or not.
Always remember: They care about their work, not about the inner feelings of your app!
It's about time to found/join an official religion that forbids to disclose any personal information because this would ruin my karma.
Nobody could turn my application down for religious believes...
if you have a roof or any other solar exposed surface, go and mount panels to heat water.
it's the only reasonable thing to do. solar power is great for low-temp heat harvesting and you don't need expensive (in terms of $ or in terms of resources wasted) controlling electronic.
water saves 4.182 kJ per K at no cost & you will save a big lot of $$$ in heating too cold water with valuable electricity or oil!
producing electricity from solar power will almost never pay out.
and PLEASE: never ever lay those panels flat out on the floor or flat on a wall. it's the most stupid thing I see so often! mount it in an angle of about 45 degrees, 'cos that's the angle you gain the biggest cross-section to the average sun beam (the angle varies by your geo-spatial position and can be calculated (we did it in the university and round our place its 43.xy degrees.... everything else is just a huge waste of too expensive panels!
Because they were on manual backup control they could not exert enough force on the controls to recover before Vne or the flutter speed of something was attained.
Airbus fly-by-wire. no force needed, it's just a "joystick".
probability is though, in extreme flying situation - with obviously failing electronic systems (fly-by-wire will by design be the last one failing...) they possibly lacked the artificial horizon - you loose orientation completely.
if you wind down in a 1G spiral, you can't detect this.
if you happen to fly into a dense cloud with a paraglider, this is how you die. with no sight and no instruments in a rather rough condition, you're doomed. you loose orientation and thus control within seconds.
a A330 needs something else tho get into this condition. but once you're there you're almost dead.
within our neighborhood we had at least two planes going down in the past 10 years just like this. one was an F/A-18 fighter, the other a small-sized commercial plane. they flew directly at full speed into ground
Slashdot Mirror
>That is why we don't have computer-piloted cars/planes/etc.
planes? sure??
on modern planes the pilots mainly program the FMS (flight management system) and talk to the human controllers and human passengers...
the flying itself - and avoiding a ton of human errors during this - is mainly done by computers. actually including for example virtually all of the landing process. heck, most pilots get a little distressed, if they have to do a manual approach, as they lack the routine.
of course, they'd take the blame for any incident (compare to Turkish Airlines Flight 1951. bottom line is the computer grounded the plane, as it was trying to land it well before the airport, because of a defective altitude sensor. guilty? not Boeing, but the two pilots not noticing the wrong behavior of the computer.
the same would apply for the car controlling bot. a driver in charge is still mandatory. they take the blame for those 500 accidents - but still the major part of the 10k will be avoided.
assisting systems in cars will be increasing significantly over the next decade.
Yes, I fancy the idea of having RFID readers in the hands of millions and credit card / biometric passport reading software right there at the app-store.
No irony. There's NOTHING that makes (insecure) RFID vanish faster from cc/passports!
I very much fancy the idea with different icons for different error messages. It does improve the recognition of 'something special going on', as I can say from some pretty small samples where I could test that.
Two downsides remained:
a) Users DID (as they reported later) recognize a special message ('with that picture of a puppy') being presented. But they did not get the message at all (reading - understanding - correcting the problem wasn't improved)
b) The more different icons got involved, the more people just got confused. They just thought of the application as 'a little bit' funny
What got me better results is incorporating the error message into the actual working ui. Think of red boxes around fields that are not properly filled. Say if they break something while entering some customer data, let the whole customer data form turn angry-red or mildly-orange - or maybe just parts.
Highlight broken parts where they should go and fix something. They would only do it, if it got some value for them. If they are responsible for a customer telephone number to be correct, they'd care about a red phone number field. Otherwise they wouldn't.
If they want to go online with their wi-fi, they will care about a red wi-fi icon.
So my advice: Don't distract with (unrelated) icons, pictures or error messages as a whole. You already got their attention on the subject that matters to them. Tell them in an easy and intuitive pattern (traffic light color) if that's ok or not.
Always remember: They care about their work, not about the inner feelings of your app!
... will it blend ???
It's about time to found/join an official religion that forbids to disclose any personal information because this would ruin my karma. Nobody could turn my application down for religious believes...
I never got that FF extension - what did I do wrong?? - I feel so left out.... ;(
speaking about culture: don't forget SCOUnix ;)
if you have a roof or any other solar exposed surface, go and mount panels to heat water. it's the only reasonable thing to do. solar power is great for low-temp heat harvesting and you don't need expensive (in terms of $ or in terms of resources wasted) controlling electronic. water saves 4.182 kJ per K at no cost & you will save a big lot of $$$ in heating too cold water with valuable electricity or oil! producing electricity from solar power will almost never pay out. and PLEASE: never ever lay those panels flat out on the floor or flat on a wall. it's the most stupid thing I see so often! mount it in an angle of about 45 degrees, 'cos that's the angle you gain the biggest cross-section to the average sun beam (the angle varies by your geo-spatial position and can be calculated (we did it in the university and round our place its 43.xy degrees.... everything else is just a huge waste of too expensive panels!
it wasn't "invented" - it was CREATED! (something as beautiful & wide-spread as the English language could only be created by the spaghetti-monster!!)
you could if it was a mac...
Because they were on manual backup control they could not exert enough force on the controls to recover before Vne or the flutter speed of something was attained.
Airbus fly-by-wire. no force needed, it's just a "joystick". probability is though, in extreme flying situation - with obviously failing electronic systems (fly-by-wire will by design be the last one failing...) they possibly lacked the artificial horizon - you loose orientation completely. if you wind down in a 1G spiral, you can't detect this. if you happen to fly into a dense cloud with a paraglider, this is how you die. with no sight and no instruments in a rather rough condition, you're doomed. you loose orientation and thus control within seconds. a A330 needs something else tho get into this condition. but once you're there you're almost dead. within our neighborhood we had at least two planes going down in the past 10 years just like this. one was an F/A-18 fighter, the other a small-sized commercial plane. they flew directly at full speed into ground