This is the first time it's really public, as in everyone can see it not jut the people involved. And the first generation to be raised with that isn't exactly old enough to be hiring, in most cases.
So until now people have been able to pretend they are above that sort of behavior and that when they where kids everyone went to school, studied hard, and was above average.
Once the 1st generation of people who spent there youth screwing around in the public eye get ole enough, no one is going to care about tour screwing around when you where a teen because everyone does it to some degree.
so adding more processing units/and memory doesn't mean more performance on a specialized machine design to have those added? Interesting..no wait, stupid, not interesting. My mistake.
Yeah, you try to create some laws to govern a speculative future. Could you imagine writing regulation for the internet in 1950? You can't regulate until after something is in the wild, otherwise it will fail horrible.
"It is fascism defined."
no, it is not. You should probably understand what fascism is before spewing nonsense out of your pie hole. . Fascism is about nationalism, and comes from syndicalism. Please tell me how corporation running things is nationalism or syndicalism.
SInce it's a srudy involving random stops it would be a waste of money to do so.
" if the frog has been boiled yet." That is a myth in every use of the phrase. History is full of government that where over ran by the citizens when the government went too far.
"...at least the named driver refused to everything but a breathalyzer." yes, becasue its voluntary. As was the Breathalyzer. Not exactly the big government crack down you are trying to make it.
Why don't you learn to follow up and understand these things so you can direct your outrage at actual issues an ignore these non events?
Yes, people will diew, that doesn't mean I want my risk of dying increased because of some other assholes decisions. And many of those dead kids where in the drunks vehicle. It's not like they even had a choice.
"predicated on the idea that if someone doesn't die from a drunk driver, or while drunk driving, that they won't die at all; wrong. Way to take it to a non-sensible extreme. I don't want my odds of dying increased. It's pretty simple.
30% of traffic accident deaths are caused by alcohol-impaired-driving. Much lower then in the 70's.
ANd you hit opn the gray area of these studies. IF they cite them, then these studies become useless. IF they don't then there is a risk* of an accident.
I think the best solution is to just tell them 'Park you car and find a ride. If you leave here driving a vehicle I'll call the on duty police officer to find you.'
So they don't get cited at that time, but you can still get the data.
Of and being a contractor working for a federal agency does not make you a federal employee, and most federal employees don't cite drivers.
This isn't the first time and it is voluntary. The is just Texans too cowardly to say 'no think you' to an off duty police officer and then whining about it later. From the article "They're essentially lying to you when they say it's completely voluntary, because they're testing you at that moment," Colosi said.
Slashdot Mirror
This is the first time it's really public, as in everyone can see it not jut the people involved.
And the first generation to be raised with that isn't exactly old enough to be hiring, in most cases.
So until now people have been able to pretend they are above that sort of behavior and that when they where kids everyone went to school, studied hard, and was above average.
Once the 1st generation of people who spent there youth screwing around in the public eye get ole enough, no one is going to care about tour screwing around when you where a teen because everyone does it to some degree.
OR maybe you were wrong?
uses bias to judge people news at 11
so adding more processing units/and memory doesn't mean more performance on a specialized machine design to have those added?
Interesting..no wait, stupid, not interesting. My mistake.
"... current rate of scaling in the 1980s err 1990 err 2000, definitely 2000 err 2010.. I know; definitely 2020.
Yeah, you try to create some laws to govern a speculative future.
Could you imagine writing regulation for the internet in 1950?
You can't regulate until after something is in the wild, otherwise it will fail horrible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_mDTLphIVY
[Edit] Fixed link.
Those sucker not knowing about the real /. login, are bunch of rubes.
[Edit] Fixed spelling.
I was like, enough people hack those they can get some useful data?
"It is fascism defined."
no, it is not. You should probably understand what fascism is before spewing nonsense out of your pie hole.
.
Fascism is about nationalism, and comes from syndicalism. Please tell me how corporation running things is nationalism or syndicalism.
But Terrorist are interesting.
SInce it's a srudy involving random stops it would be a waste of money to do so.
" if the frog has been boiled yet."
That is a myth in every use of the phrase.
History is full of government that where over ran by the citizens when the government went too far.
"...at least the named driver refused to everything but a breathalyzer."
yes, becasue its voluntary. As was the Breathalyzer.
Not exactly the big government crack down you are trying to make it.
Why don't you learn to follow up and understand these things so you can direct your outrage at actual issues an ignore these non events?
Well, that's Monarchy for you.
no one gets out alive. . . so far.
Yes, people will diew, that doesn't mean I want my risk of dying increased because of some other assholes decisions.
And many of those dead kids where in the drunks vehicle. It's not like they even had a choice.
"predicated on the idea that if someone doesn't die from a drunk driver, or while drunk driving, that they won't die at all;
wrong. Way to take it to a non-sensible extreme. I don't want my odds of dying increased. It's pretty simple.
30% of traffic accident deaths are caused by alcohol-impaired-driving. Much lower then in the 70's.
This? this got modded up? When was the last time kidnapping was voluntary?
"This is the worst case of reading comprehension failure I've seen on this site. "
You must be new here...
You don't need to be a police officer to stop or direct traffic. Have you never seen a flagger at a construction site?
ANd you hit opn the gray area of these studies. IF they cite them, then these studies become useless. IF they don't then there is a risk* of an accident.
I think the best solution is to just tell them 'Park you car and find a ride. If you leave here driving a vehicle I'll call the on duty police officer to find you.'
So they don't get cited at that time, but you can still get the data.
Of and being a contractor working for a federal agency does not make you a federal employee, and most federal employees don't cite drivers.
*not as high as people think.
This isn't the first time and it is voluntary. The is just Texans too cowardly to say 'no think you' to an off duty police officer and then whining about it later.
From the article
"They're essentially lying to you when they say it's completely voluntary, because they're testing you at that moment," Colosi said.
Hay lady, did you say 'No thank you'?
Bad 80's hair is no reason to go flinging people at things.
When it was tuned to attack a specific type of target.
Navigate via landmarks, probably.
You don't actually need GPS to find someplace, it's just a lot easier and more accurate.
The plural of Opus is opuses or opera.
Opi is said by pretentious ignorant music wanks.
Three