Slashdot Mirror


And Now For Something Completely Different: Monty Python Reunion Planned

cold fjord writes with this report from The Telegraph: "The original members of Monty Python will reunite more than 30 years after the comedy troupe last worked together. John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Terry Jones, Eric Idle and Michael Palin will officially announce their reformation at a London press conference on Thursday. The five surviving members have reportedly been in months of secret talks about getting the Flying Circus back on the road. The reunion comes after several failed attempts to reform by the group. However, according to The Sun, the surviving members realised 'it was now or never,' and had decided to embark upon 'a fully-fledged reunion.'" Related stories include this commentary, one take on the best of Python and this negative reaction, too.

168 comments

  1. Ah, they are not dead. by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are just pining for the fjords.

    1. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just don't want put in the cart.

    2. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Don't be a baby. Now come at me with a banana.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Funny

      They are just pining for the fjords.

      Did somebody call?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      It's a dogs life in the modern Monty Python troupe.

    5. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      They are just pining for the fjords.

      What kinda talk is that....?

      If you hadn't nailed them to the perch, they'd be pushing up the daisies!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. This isn't an NSA story so you can safely go away.

    7. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by watcher-rv4 · · Score: 0

      Unless they are creating something about privacy stuff, you know.

    8. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      I'll feel free to comment here or on any story that I care to. And I suggest you don't look to see who submitted this story.

      You might be a little tense. Perhaps you need some exercise. Why don't you fall in with that lot?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    9. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      They are just pining for the fjords.

      Perhaps taking a page out of Eric Idle's playbook - we'll call it The Greedy Bastards Tour.

      If they do come anywhere near where I live I will be there.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    10. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Well, that's before they finish off their secret plan: Tell the funniest joke in the world, on stage. Because what a way to go, even if it takes an entire audience with them!

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    11. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Nice link.... but honestly, it barely makes my top ten. A Fish Called Wanda, right? "You are the vulgarian, you fuck." "Now was that smart? Was it shrewd? Was it good tactics? Or was it stupid?"

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    12. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Will there be a poinTed Stick involved??

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    13. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll feel free to comment here or on any story that I care to.

      Yes, of course you do. And, what, exactly?

      You might not yet have realized that you've been undermining your credibility steadily with your posts in anything and everything related to the NSA (or similar) and Snowden (or Manning, or whomever else) for quite some time now.

      A reasonable post here and there isn't enough to help you get back up, although the saner tone (from you) is welcome. You have a long way to go, and there is no indication that you'll walk it, so far. Sad.

    14. Re:Ah, they are not dead. by Vegemite_Sandwich · · Score: 1

      Shut up!

  2. Wow! by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody expected that!

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nobody expected that!

      No one expects Monty Python Reunion.

    2. Re:Wow! by cultiv8 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're not quite dead yet

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    3. Re:Wow! by freeze128 · · Score: 2

      Well, they're not getting BETTER....

    4. Re:Wow! by Alejux · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, their chief weapon is surprise.

    5. Re:Wow! by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      Surprise, and comedy.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    6. Re:Wow! by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Their two weapons are surprise, comedy and ruthless absurdity.

    7. Re:Wow! by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      They're just pining for the fjords.

    8. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have Monty Python ever done for us?

    9. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, five bullets should do it.

  3. They're planning a reunion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, they aren't.

    1. Re:They're planning a reunion? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's not an argument. You're just being contradictory.

    2. Re:They're planning a reunion? by intermodal · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, your five minutes are up.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:They're planning a reunion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was never five minutes just now.

    4. Re:They're planning a reunion? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      That was never five minutes just now.

      I'm afraid it was.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  4. Re:I'll bet the NSA knew by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    well as long as it confuses someone.

    anyways, some of cleeses newer comments have been funny.

    aaanyhow, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8Afv3U_ysc

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  5. Can't wait to get tickets by mekkab · · Score: 2

    for the "John Cleese can't afford his alimony" tour! I hear it's 90 minutes of grumbling about ex-wives!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Can't wait to get tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had to get up half an hour before we went to bed!

    2. Re:Can't wait to get tickets by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Still better than Andrew Dice Clay's "Weeping Openly in a Fetal Position" tour.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    3. Re:Can't wait to get tickets by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      not that far from what he has already done:
      Alimony Tour:
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2137028/?ref_=nm_flmg_slf_16

      and there was something else I saw on PBS a few years back that was a sort of mockumentary that had him and a 'trophy wife' lounging around a SoCal mansion swimming pool with him saying really stupid egotistical things which ended up with him floating dead in the water while the Trophy Wife ignored the corpse and prepared to cash in. Couldn't find it on imdb, but considering his marriage woes I thought is was pretty awesome for him to do that!

      -I'm just sayin'

  6. Graham by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Funny

    With another special appearance by Dr. Chapman's Urn.

    1. Re:Graham by slashmojo · · Score: 1

      and he'll have all the best lines!

    2. Re:Graham by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Better late than never!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Graham by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      Muffled cries of "I'm not dead yet"?

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    4. Re:Graham by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: "What would it take to get the whole gang back together?"

      A: "Given that Graham Chapman is dead, about two bullets each ought to do the trick."

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    5. Re:Graham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shamelessly stolen from the official MPATHG collectible card game.

    6. Re:Graham by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What? Shamelessly stolen from an ancient 'what will it take to reunite the beatles' joke.

      3 more bullets was funnier.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  7. Poorly titled.... by nick357 · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong - I love these guys as much as anyone else. But isn't this going to be the exact opposite of "Something Completely Different"?

    1. Re:Poorly titled.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know? You haven't even seen their Grateful Dead cover band set yet.

    2. Re:Poorly titled.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now for something much the same.

    3. Re:Poorly titled.... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I just can't believe Gilliam would get involved simply for them to go on a tour redoing forty year old skits. Palin and Jones have continued to be writing partners, Cleese still dabbles in it, Idle is constantly writing annoying music and Gilliam, well, he's pretty much my favorite filmmaker, who has, in his way, kept the spirit of Python going while the others have gone in other directions, coasted, or in the case of Idle, ravaged the corpse for Broadway revues.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Poorly titled.... by jovius · · Score: 1

      Nothing inadequately conventional?

    5. Re:Poorly titled.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone always has something critical to say. Can't please everyone I guess.

  8. "We're not dead yet!" by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    "Well they're coughing up blood!"

    "Isn't there anything you can do?"

    "Oh Alright.."

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  9. Obligatory by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://xkcd.com/16/

    So hopefully they'll give us some new spontaneous material to drive into the ground with endless repetition for decades to come? (And i admit, i'm as guilty of that as the next geek.)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Obligatory by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      (And i admit, i'm as guilty of that as the next geek.)

      You did it in this very post. I'm curious how many people realize the irony* of calling that comic reference obligatory. Linking an obligatory comment is at the heart of what that particular comic was attacking.

      To be fair, some of the sketches, like the "Four Yorkshireman" skit (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1wHxTyo) lend themselves very well to ad-libbing without entirely descending into snowclone memes.

      *I don't care about your particular definition of irony.

    2. Re:Obligatory by pepty · · Score: 1

      By the time I was 15 I started to meet people who absolutely hate Monty Python. My unofficial poll found that most of the haters had their first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth ... and fifty first exposures to MP via acquaintances who repeated fragments of the jokes and sketches to them. That's as far as I got though: never found out why they hate Monty Python.

    3. Re:Obligatory by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      I believe, given what's said in the comic, that what Munroe was objecting to was not quotations in general, but quoting, fur humorous purposes, material whose foundation for humor was its surreality. And _personally_ i would say that although some xkcd comics are certainly surreal, that is not actually the founding principle of xkcd. I'm sure opinions vary however. The comic in question here certainly has some surreal elements, but the comic itself is about a non-surreal topic, which is why it was referenced in the first place.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:Obligatory by lgw · · Score: 1

      I don't care about your particular definition of irony.

      It's like goldy, or silvery, but made of iron. You know, the opposite of wrinkly.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people, (particularly nurses) don't like silly voices, or men dressing up as women, special effects makeup (too much like cancer patients) or making fun of average people (pensioners, nurses, shop assistants), blood''n'guts violence (not realistic or too much like work) or fast flashing visual effects (gives them a headache). Clean comedy like Laurel and Hardy, Fawlty Towers, Brittas Empire, Keeping Up Appearances and Metal Mickey would be acceptable.

  10. Memories are tied to emotion by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    Memories are tied to emotion. In broad strokes, emotions act as a "volume control" for how well and easily you remember. A situation accompanied by emotion is important for survival, so you tend to remember the details. It's why we can recall the exciting parts of movies, but not the dialogue.

    It's also why, even now 30 years later, nerds can recite large swatches of Monty Python verbatim.

    1. Re:Memories are tied to emotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just thinking this last night, in reference to the TV show The Incredible Hulk. Both my wife and I watched it as kids, but all we can remember are the exciting bits (like the hurricane episode) and have forgotten most of the story lines.

      It's now in the Netflix queue.

    2. Re:Memories are tied to emotion by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking this last night, in reference to the TV show The Incredible Hulk. Both my wife and I watched it as kids, but all we can remember are the exciting bits (like the hurricane episode) and have forgotten most of the story lines.

      It's now in the Netflix queue.

      No, that's something completely different -- I went back and watched some of those shows, and realized that the first time I watched it, I never even noticed the story lines. That's not something you usually become aware of until you're older, which is why many shows didn't have much story line to begin with. I still remember the story line of the Hulk's pilot episode, but none of the plots from once the show actually started rolling. Let me know if you find any.

    3. Re:Memories are tied to emotion by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Go look up the list of things that made David Banner go green over the course of the series. You'll laugh your ass off.

  11. I hope they have lots of new material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really looking for yet another "Best of Python" stitched together and acted by old men.

    1. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

      That's still better than nickleback.

    2. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      If Terry Gilliam is involved, I doubt it will just be a rehash. Besides, I have a fairly good feeling Terry Jones has likely been sitting on some damned good material for the last quarter century.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Well yes, but Gay Hitler Sings The Hits is better than Nickelback.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

      They need moar moneyz. Seriously. There are fans that would pay, even if just to see the same material repeated over again. I'm a fan, but I don't need to see the old stuff played again by, as you say, old men.

      However, if they were to present some good new stuff, that would be a different story. I'd really appreciate some new stuff.

      Joke time: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb? Two, one to hold the giraffe, and the other to fill the bath tub with multicolored power-tools.

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    5. Re: I hope they have lots of new material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget the Python film that's been brewing for decades: "The History of America", hilariously poking fun at semi-loosely-true half-myths that have been viewed as sacred by Americans for generations...

    6. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

      Not really looking for yet another "Best of Python" stitched together and acted by old men.

      I'll have you're Python, then. I love it!

    7. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by xevioso · · Score: 1

      REALLY? On a thread like this and you really have to invoke Godwin's law so soon? Really?

    9. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know who is worse than Nazis? Nickleback, that's who.

    10. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Joke time: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb?

      A Fish.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      howard johnson is right!

    12. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      No, it's a sail boat.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    13. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new sheriff is a ni[BONG]

    14. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's a sailfish!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by sootman · · Score: 1

      I think they should do exactly that, and call it "And now for something completely the same."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    16. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You've got the wrong map here. That's Stalingrad.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    17. Re:I hope they have lots of new material by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Three

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re: I hope they have lots of new material by able1234au · · Score: 1

      i would pay to see that.

  12. Great by korbulon · · Score: 0

    The corpse of another fond childhood memory to be poked and prodded over - and ultimately ruined - by deluded old men. Much of Monty Python's appeal stemmed from poking fun at the establishment, at ridiculing societal norms. Now they are part of the establishment.

    1. Re:Great by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      At this point it's for their benefit. Let the old guys wallow in nostalgia. It's what old folks do.

      Who knows, they might surprise us with something new and good.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Great by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      The corpse of another fond childhood memory to be poked and prodded over - and ultimately ruined - by deluded old men. Much of Monty Python's appeal stemmed from poking fun at the establishment, at ridiculing societal norms. Now they are part of the establishment.

      Maybe this will be something completely different, and they'll be poking fun at the upcoming generation instead?

    3. Re:Great by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I know how you feel but you could be wrong.

      Mission of Burma came out of retirement about 20 years after they broke up. When I got their first studio album after this hiatus I was nervous about it. I almost didn't want to listen to it for fear that what esteem I had for them would be shattered if it was garbage. It turned out great and even for a bunch of aging punks they've still got it where it counts.

      On the other hand, we've seen many giants come out of retirement and totally fall on their face. This happens mostly with sports stars, age catches up to everyone. It's sad to see a great athlete limp off into the sunset when they knew well enough to retire on top of their game years ago. I'd hate to see the boys from Python do the same.

      If I were betting on it I'd guess that they'll do fairly well but a lot of material will seem like half-baked rehashes of old material. Only time will tell.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:Great by korbulon · · Score: 1

      Who knows, they might surprise us with something new and good.

      Ya mean like George Lucas and Ridley Scott did with their magnum opi?

    5. Re:Great by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      You mean like a Rolling Stones Concert or watching [80's Super band] run through their standards?

      Last time I want to a concert featuring a band I loved in the late 70/80s it was a shock (yeah, talking about you CSN). It would have been better to put speakers outside and listen with my eyes closed to a playlist of their songs. I don't want to see old guys overwriting the memories of when they were young guys. Even when I saw Springsteen, and he almost never ages, it was not the same.

      I'd almost prefer a show where five old farts talk about their time together, pull out clips of their favorites, maybe adlib a bit and allow us into their "living room" for a great chat.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    6. Re:Great by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I said might.

      When they were young they made us laugh by mocking the old.

      Now that they are old maybe will make us laugh mocking the young. They deserve it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Great by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Good point. I'll amend that when I watched a show with James Taylor and Carol King I loved it. They made their old stuff sound fresh in more intimate way which I enjoyed. At the least it will be something to see.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    8. Re:Great by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I still can't bring myself to listen to the new 'sex pistols' album.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Great by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The plural of Opus is opuses or opera.

      Opi is said by pretentious ignorant music wanks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Great by korbulon · · Score: 1

      Oh, ok. Thanks.

      What's the plural of asshole?

    11. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that'd be "assholes". But do we really need more of these?

      Oh, I'm sorry... is your bastardised version of the language causing confusion again? Learn to fucking spell you American twat.

    12. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdotter?

    13. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Korbulons

  13. I feel happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there was much rejoicing.

  14. Re:Enough reunions by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually I don't think you're right here. I don't think anyone in Python would agree with you, either. By their own admission they built on and expanded the type of humor that "The Goon Show" brought to prominence. They aren't a copy of the Goon Show, but go listen to it and you'll hear the legacy.

  15. Always Look on the... by Jhon · · Score: 1

    Bright Side of Life (whistles).

  16. Re:Enough reunions by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Well, to be fair, I'd say Peter Cook and the Goons were pretty major influences, and the Pythons regularly cite them. Certainly Spike Milligan's anarchic humor is a straight line between the comedic revolution of the 1950s and early 1960s and Python. The chief difference between the Q series and Python was that Milligan was pretty deranged and more inconsistent than the Pythons, but still that fundamental absurdism is something the Pythons built on.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  17. What's the big deal by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    I have watched several Monty Python stuff. There are a few skits here and there which are very funny. But a lot of them are boring.

    OTOH, I am a big fan of John Cleese's Fawlty Towers. I have watched every episode atleast 20 times and it's always amazingly funny.

  18. Re:Enough reunions by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    The beginnings of the Q series and Monty Python were about the same time. After watching each other Spike apparently wanted to do what Monty Python was doing and vice versa. There was some direct cross-pollination during that period of time.

  19. They had their reunion in 1983 by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

    A Pythons reunion now would be like a Beatles reunion consisting of just Ringo.

    1. Re:They had their reunion in 1983 by varmfskii · · Score: 1

      I remember in late 1980, the dark joke going around was "What would it take to get the Beatles back together? Three more bullets."

    2. Re:They had their reunion in 1983 by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I didn't take until the late 80's.

      That was just when you heard the joke. That joke was old before Yoko had time to get sexually frustrated.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:They had their reunion in 1983 by varmfskii · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand. I literally meant late in the year 1980 (the year that John was shot), not late in the 1980s.

  20. Re:I'll bet the NSA knew by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    now my cat is confused.

  21. Re:Mildly amusing the first time by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    "We are all individuals"

  22. I'm a programmer and I'm above average -or so by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm a programmer and I'm above average -or so I think-, I hack all day and have too little sleep at night.

    I cut down b-trees, I skip and jump, I like to piss off people by using gotoes.

    My code is unintelligible and I hang around with the coffee machine.

    I wish I were a metal worker just like my dear mama.

    I should not have pushed the submit button bit still I did.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:I'm a programmer and I'm above average -or so by neminem · · Score: 1

      A number of years I actually came across a great, similar parody titled "The Engineer" song, particularly amusing in that the chorus was, "I'm an engineer and I'm ok / I work all night and I sleep all day". Totally can't find that one now, sadly.

      And yeah, yours doesn't even come *close* to scanning properly.

    2. Re:I'm a programmer and I'm above average -or so by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Blowing up the rap scene faster than factorial functions
      I'm dope like PNP transistors, and I'll saturate your junctions
      By the time you rhyme one line, I've already busted ten;
      You rap in exponential time, and I'm Big-O of log(n).

      -- Monzy, "Drama in the PhD"

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    3. Re:I'm a programmer and I'm above average -or so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, dammit, he's a programmer, not a comedian, Jim!

  23. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same old jokes, the one's that nerds have absolutely beaten to death before fucking the corpses, redone by grampas.

    Haha the parrot is dead! I don't like spam!

  24. Monty Python on 1/8th power by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

    ...is still better than most comedy troupes can manage at full effort. So yeah.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Monty Python on 1/8th power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put them with KITH and that would be something I may actually pay to see...

  25. Re:Enough reunions by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've watched a fair chunk of the first couple of Q series, and while there are some insanely funny bits, all in all, I find Milligan, on his own, could get a little tiresome. Perhaps, in part, it was because there was six Pythons who would sit down, hear the sketches the others had come up with and would be able to throw it out the trash, or perhaps reuse it in inventive and unforeseen ways, whereas Milligan didn't have the benefit of a large group of equals to clean up material. Milligan was also far more willing to go for a cheap laugh, and even by late 1960s and early 1970s standards some of his skits were astonishingly racist.

    I look at this way; Monty Python without the Fish Slapping Dance would not have been Monty Python. Monty Python that was a large part Fish Slapping Dances would have been unbearable.

    Still, Milligan was a comedic genius of the first order, who, when he was in his head, was probably one of the funniest men who ever lived. Every time I watch the skit with the domestic Daleks blowing up everyone and everything in the flat, I fall off my chair.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  26. Re:I'll bet the NSA knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Conspiring to perform a comedy I'll bet would be the charge.

    Or worse, if they intend to perform "The Funniest Joke In The World".

  27. King who? by R4ZORJ4CK · · Score: 1

    I blow my wind in your general direction!

  28. Silly walks.. by slashmojo · · Score: 1

    I will have to do one in celebration! As soon as I get back from my weekly meeting of the Peoples Front of Judea.. or was it the Peoples Judean Front?

    1. Re:Silly walks.. by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 1

      Splitter!

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
  29. Re:I'll bet the NSA knew by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Say....No.....MORE!!!

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  30. icon choice by themushroom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Funny that the icon on this picture is the British phone booth, not the Python foot used for humor stories.

  31. Re:I'll bet the NSA knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Help, help! I'm being repressed!

  32. A prediction by TheloniousToady · · Score: 3, Funny

    The reunion comes after several failed attempts to reform by the group.

    The Pythons may reunite but they'll never reform. Especially Chapman.

    1. Re:A prediction by nihilistcanada · · Score: 2

      Oh, I don't know. A little water and a good spatula could make a jaunty afternoon of sculpting.

  33. If Cleese has his say... by retech · · Score: 1

    I saw the video for the "comedy tour" John Cleese did most recently. And how anyone felt it would be funny is beyond me. Don't get me wrong I feel collectively and individually these guys have done some fantastic stuff that has and will withstand time. But Cleese comes off as an embittered old man who is just trying to justify his entire life by proving how much better he made Python and if it weren't for him look how dull these things would have been. Oh, and he reallllly hates his exwife. We know this by, not only the title, but by the 45 minute rant about how much he hates her.

    Please, bask in the truth of what was, and go out on that note.

    1. Re:If Cleese has his say... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Cleese was always a bit of an asshole. Watch interviews with him from any period from when they first made it big until now, and he was came off as abrasive, arrogant and argumentative. Even he, on occasion, has admitted it. And he's been bitching about ex-wives as long as he had ex-wives, so that's nothing new. The only thing new is he asking you to fork over the money for a ticket to hear him bitch about his ex-wives instead of showing up on talk shows and doing it for free.

      Another major prick is Eric Idle, who has also come off as abrasive, arrogant, argumentative and at times just outright mean. He's treatment of Neil Innes is unforgivable, particular when you consider that The Ruttles wouldn't have existed without Innes. Idle has also been the most willing to simultaneously spurn previous plans to reunite whilst simultaneously ripping off chunks of the Python corpse for mediocre musicals.

      I'm actually amazed they've actually been able to get into a room long enough to plot out a reunion. I would imagine money is a big part of it. Cleese's marital problems are well known, but I'd hazard a guess Gilliam has pissed off enough investors that he wouldn't mind getting some new seed money. Let's face it, a Python reunion tour would be as big and profitable as a Led Zeppelin reunion tour.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:If Cleese has his say... by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      I haven't followed what he's been up to for a very long while, but I do recall he had a rather idi osyncratic opinion on what made humour. He believed for something to be funny it had to be awkward, uncomfortable, embarassing, uncomfortable. And you can see there was a lot of that in Fawlty Towers and it worked.
      But for me it was enough. I don't want to experience large doses of uncomfortable feelings so he lost me.

      So he's not just a bitter old man - maybe somewhat I don't know - but he thinks that is the essence of humour. And it isn't.

    3. Re:If Cleese has his say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw the video for the "comedy tour" John Cleese did most recentl

      Eh. I thought this was funny, and it's only 5 years old....

  34. Piped in laugh tracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do not age very well...

  35. Re:Enough reunions by Skiron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is a good story re Spike and the Pythons.
    When the Pythons were in Malta filming 'Life of Brian', they heard that Spike was staying nearby on holiday. So they called him up, and quickly changed a few scripts to write him into the film.
    . They shot the first day, and all was well and good... then the next day Spike didn't turn up for filming. Hurriedly they chased him up and found he had gone home!
    So, back to re-writing the scripts again.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym-k5viJ7tA

  36. Don't give up the day job by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    It doesn't rhyme.

    Then again it doesn't scan either.

    YOU SUCK.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Don't give up the day job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It doesn't rhyme.

      Then again it doesn't scan either.

      YOU SUCK.

      We apologise for the fault in the comment. The person responsible has been sacked, and whill shortly be replaced by a Lla, err, Monty Python.

  37. Now for something completely different by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    A man with a tape recorder up his nose.

  38. I don't think they are funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think they are funny.

  39. Life of Muhammad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are they going to make that?

    That one will be a box office explosion!

  40. 30 years? Unpossible!! by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 4, Funny

    I saw them live at the Hollywood Bowl when I was 18, so that would mean I'd have to be.......oh crap.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  41. Success through constant failure by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of Monty Python's routines are absolute classics that merit repetition, because they're that good. But that's only the very cream of the crop. Most skits were eminently forgettable; a fair number were just plain bad. And watching Flying Circus, it often seems as if they had no idea which were which.

    Monty Python was willing to go way outside the box. The box usually exists for a reason: it's the material that has worked. There are some brilliant new ideas outside the box, and a vast world of crap. It takes a genius to find the pearls among that crap, and Monty Python were without doubt just such geniuses. But even so, what they brought back still required a fair bit of sifting.

    Flying Circus episodes can be enjoyed simply for the joy of the search. The skits that fail were (frequently, at least) noble failures. They came, they tried, and we mostly forgot about them. If their stunning, world-changing successes did nothing more than expand the box... well, that's an accomplishment. You're never going to destroy the box entirely, because the fact is that the vast majority of ideas are just plain bad.

    I'll be happy to see if those geniuses can find something worth expanding the box still further, but I have to suspect that it'll look more like Flying Circus than Holy Grail. (Holy Grail was, itself, a holy grail: a stunning fraction of it worked, in a way that few other things they tried did.) Good on them for trying it; it's the risk of failure that makes the successes worthwhile.

    1. Re:Success through constant failure by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      It takes a genius to find the pearls among that crap, and Monty Python were without doubt just such geniuses. But even so, what they brought back still required a fair bit of sifting.

      To be fair, that's because a good deal of what they brought back was cultural or topical or both... things which don't bear much repetition, don't export well, and generally age very badly.

    2. Re:Success through constant failure by mikael · · Score: 1

      There were some basic comedy rules, like power-rivalry and sudden role reversal. You could have some strong characters like Vikings come across a Death like ferryman, covered head-to-toe like a leper. With a deep booming voice Death summons their leader to sit in the boat and be ferried to the land of his ancestors and feast for all eternity. The Viking leader knocks him into the river, steals the boat and goes off looking for women. Next thing you have the Death frantically paddling in the water, shouting that the leader is a big bully, he's taken out a loan for the boat and he's got a wife and kids to feed, and furthermore he can't even swim.

      Then you can have apparently uneducated characters like peasants in a field having philosophical discussions with a king over political leadership, self governance and collective rule. Fawlty Towers was another good example of power-rivalry. They actually based it on a hotel owner who had mental health issues. That had a certain balance in that Basil Fawlty could tell Manuel what to do but Cybil his wife would keep him in check, while Polly always tried to cool things down.

      The other rule was escalating chaos slapstick; the best one is Jabberwocky, where there is the workshop for repairing knights armor. It's a highly well oiled setup, but then one guy has to be a nuisance and keep distracting the team leader. Eventually, the whole operation goes out of sync because the hammer guy hits his assistant, who then turns round, starts hopping about and knocks someone else off, balance who then drops the knight he's hauling up on a rope, back onto the horse which then gallops out of the castle, tearing down bunting, pulling down tents, knocking over urns of hot oil, before shooting out of the castle entrance straight into the breath of the Jabberwocky.

      It's not so funny when it happens to normal characters, but when it happens to bossy impatient characters or the bad guy then it's funny.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Success through constant failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I think Monty Python is HUGELY overrated. Many skits are funny, just like many skits on SNL.. *OF ANY ERA*. Watch entire episodes of all of them and there are a lot of clunkers.

      That doesn't even mean I would never consider going to this.

    4. Re:Success through constant failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were not "geniuses" a lot of the sketches bordered on just childish behavior. What they had were BALLS, balls to make fun of things that most considered taboo. The label "genius" is as redundant as saying "old school". You had a group of misfits that got tired of the status quo of comedy shows and decided to shatter the norms.

      The truth is they are desperate for money, and myself having kept up with each member, and there revolving attitudes towards each other, find it hard to believe they are just doing it for old times sake. The stuff the did is on film, video, and records what more could you possible do to make it funny by playing it out on a live stage?

      If they would have created another show for 24 or so episodes, or even a new movie, it would be curious. I do watch and like the shows/movies and they did things, you would have NEVER be able to do in the US for that time, and because of that I have a disdain for this country, and its "we are the freest" propaganda, however the BBC got to be just as bad if not worse.

    5. Re:Success through constant failure by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they could tell the pearls from the crap since they did three movies of almost entirely pearls. The problem is they couldn't create pearls fast enough to fill up the schedule, so they had to let in some crap as well.

      But more to the point as to their humour, I don't think the term "genius" really does it justice. There's a lot of genius in comedy but what they brought was an outrageous creativity. You said they were outside the box but I don't think that really captures it. Look at Mitchell and Webb, probably the best sketch show I've seen since Kids in the Hall. It's hilarious, but like all sketch comedy it uses a very standard model. Outrageous characters, odd jobs, weird setting, funny observations, and witty dialogue. It's really hard to break out of those standard models.

      But look at the things Monty Python did like the Fish Slapping Dance or the Philosopher's Football match. The first part of the Argument clinic could be been done by most shows, but they would have ended when he stormed out of the argument clinic. Monty python keeps going to complain and get hit on the head, they're not just joking about not having a proper ending, they actually had one and ignored it. I simply can't think of another sketch troop that's shown a remotely comparable level of creativity.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re:Success through constant failure by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      I curse Python. But for them I would have gone to my grave not knowing who 'Reginald Mordling' was. He was an English Parlementcritter. Think 'Tip O'Neal' with bad teeth. He also had a funny name.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  42. And now for something completely the same by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

    I hope doing "The Ministry of Silly Walks" doesn't cause Cleese to break a hip.

    1. Re:And now for something completely the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...

      Oh, wait, you said "doesn't" ...

  43. Re:I'll bet the NSA knew by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I'm glad they're not in US, because I'm pretty sure they wouldn't fit.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  44. Too bad it's to be a live show by msobkow · · Score: 1

    It's too bad it's to be a live show. Ah well, hopefully they film at least one performance and release it for distribution.

    Though I'm sure the "Ministry of Silly Walks" may have taken a hit due to arthritis by this time. :)

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Too bad it's to be a live show by geekoid · · Score: 1

      We are The ministry of slow hobbling down the road.
      We used to be the ministry of silly walks, but that was silly
      you mean you got old.
      shhh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  45. I'll give you GOODWIN, you insolent whelp! by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!

    hee hee, saved by the slashtot umlat (tm)!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  46. Re:I'll bet the NSA knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Stop that!

    I hovered over the link and had to go to the emergency room!

  47. And now for something totally identical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all five members in their seventies, and with a combined age of 357 years, 30 years have passed since the Pythons last appeared together in The Meaning of Life.

    Wait, shouldn't that be a combined 150 years since the meaning of life came out? Or, if you include the audience.. it's been billions of years...

  48. Oh yeah? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    according to The Sun, the surviving members realised 'it was now or never,' and had decided to embark upon 'a fully-fledged reunion.'"

    Get on with it!

  49. Re:Mildly amusing the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not!

  50. Sorry, no by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    I admit, I was an inveterate Pythonite in my high school and college years, when it was still a cliquey-cool thing that not everyone knew about. I can - with too little prompting - recite great swathes of any Python film or most of the TV episodes, I watched them so many times.

    So I was delighted when I had the opportunity and the cash to go see their live show in Minneapolis, I think it was in the later 80s.

    Hm. Sad might be too strong a word. Poignant?

    Here were some men and women who'd really pushed the boundaries of comedy and done some amazing things - sure, some were misses (and I dare you to watch through the Monty Python complete ouevre without recognizing that a few really sucked), but many were hits and some were downright brilliant. And now? nearly 20 years later? Rehashing the SAME tired old bits again and again like cymbal-clapping monkeys, hoping to be thrown some small change.

    I'm current in the midst of Palin's first diaries, and already by the mid 1970s, Michael is complaining that their traveling show is nothing but a re-hash of their brightest moments. How prescient is that?

    And now for something completely...the same?

    Watching people endlessly ape Rocky Horror is one thing; it's frozen forever in celluloid. Every replay of it HAS to be the same. But with humans, that's kind of sad. Like the tired old uncle at Thanksgiving dinner that had a funny joke once, but he tells the same one every year. People grant him a perfunctory laugh, but nobody really means it. One wonders if even he believes it's genuine or is this all some sort of comedy - if not actually comical - ritual?

    Uncle, PLEASE tell some other story to make us laugh. At least try.

    If you don't have one, or dare no longer risk not getting a chuckle, maybe let someone else tell theirs?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Sorry, no by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      I also wonder why some people have certain movies they like to watch over and over. I think my (screen) time is too precious for that, I like to watch something new every time. There are too many interesting movies, books etc. made every year, and I always miss some of them anyway.

      There's probably a close connection to the way people (not me, "the people"!) use the web and social media, choosing a nice circle of familiarity to dwell in/on. It's a kind of masturbation; self improvement is masturbation -- self destruction is the answer. It's a great line from such a great movie, I've lost count on the times I've seen it.

      I'm a Slashdotter because I like to learn new things all the time. So where are my hot grits and Natalie Portman naked and petrified?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Sorry, no by bunkymag · · Score: 1

      If you don't have one, or dare no longer risk not getting a chuckle, maybe let someone else tell theirs?

      I suppose the only other alternative is to have it as a non-compulsory sort of thing, where they for example start a tour, sell tickets only to those who voluntarily want to buy them, and only those people interested need be subjected to such torture.

    3. Re:Sorry, no by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right; museums have a perfect right to exist.

      Sad that the Monty Python show is one.

      --
      -Styopa
    4. Re:Sorry, no by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      FWIW, at reaching my mid 40's, I now recognize that I simply don't have enough lifetime left to waste on nostalgia.

      If you add the time-commitment of the:
      - stack of books I want to read
      - computer games I want to play
      - movies I want to see ....and add that to my current age, it EASILY exceeds my allotted three-score-and-some, even were I to sleep nothing more than 3 hours a night and have no gainful employment.

      I rarely give a book more than 5 chapters, or a movie more than a half hour. If I don't actively enjoy it (or at least see promise/value in the writing, acting, what-have-you) I tend to drop it and move on. Life's too short to be bored, or waste it watching Twilight.

      PS: I am willing to spend some of those precious minutes on a naked Natalie Portman, please add me to the subscription.

      --
      -Styopa
  51. Please don't. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I love MP. I watched the shows, movies. I've been a fan snce the 70's. Getting them together to rehash their old work will just be sad.

    Now. if hey all do completely new stuff, that would be interesting. There much older and have different life experiences. Lets see what they can create will all that experience.

    If I want to to watch the cheese shop, I'll load it up.

    Have you in fact got any cheese here at all.
    Yes, sir.
      Really?
      No. Not really, sir.
    You haven't.
    Nosir. Not a scrap. I was deliberately wasting your time, sir.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Please don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh*

      There much older and have different life experiences.

      You seem to have a problem with there and they're. You got "their" right, one out of that ain't.. uh, get your GED, OK?

  52. who needs Python... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you have php?

  53. Re:I'll bet the NSA knew by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    What's this nun-piece doing in my versioning system?

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  54. The Beethoven Sketch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. orly? by UltraBadger · · Score: 0

    1998 was over 30 years ago?

  56. Graham Chapman is still holding out by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 2

    Other Python members claim he is deceased, but his agent has said Mr Chapman can be available for the right price.

  57. Re:Mildly amusing the first time by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I didn't expect the Spanish inquisition.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'