I worked on a tool to be used by consultants. These people have very sticky fingers. Are issue was how to we prevent consultants taking the software to another firm?
We compiled a build for each customer with there logo inserted into various places. So when you run a report, no matter what there user entered, the embedded logo would appear on the reports. Going to another accounting firm, and then generating reports for your boss with your previous companies logo on it tend to get you frowned upon.
politician: Decides the streets need to be cleaned. So they create funding and hire street sweepers. IN an interview thay woulod say "I tool the initiative in creting the street sweepers.
Now, do you think he is saying he generically engineered street sweepers, invented brooms and truck? Or do you think he is talking about making the funds available to have street sweepers?
This is high school level stuff. So either you are so wrapped up in a belief you can't actually be rational, or you can't even understand conversation at a freshman high school level.
Instead of praising him for taking the political risk to making ARPANET open, and calling it 'The Internet' , people like you need to come up with twisted ways to blame him for it.
"I have my blinds up doesn't make it legal for you to stand in the street and watch my family dress ot bathe" says who? don't bother. doesn't matter it's a bad comparison.
To use you, stupid, analogy a bit better. Its akin to pulling your blinds up, and then yelling out your window that it's ok for people to watch you family bath.
Do you know how those systems work at all? Let me give you na overview. System A: Sends out broadcast saying "hey, here i am!" System B: "I see you, can I connect?"\ System A:" can do the following: 1-"sure come on in!" 2-"Sure, just give me a password" In these cases, System a chose 1 - "Come on in!"
Yes, it gets a lot more detailed, especially on the authorization side, but that doesn't matted becasue these system didn't ask for authorization.
And, in fact, it many places, what they did was not illegal. I would hard pressed to find a place where the scenro is illegal. Now if they were using an attack to gather the password, or get around a password that's a different story.
". You know, computers communicate with each other,"
yes, and in this scenario the communication included 'Come on in!'
You have no idea about depression and suicide. So you look like an ignorant asshole
These situations aren't the same, but I do have Sympathy for Aaron.
Sadly, asswipe like you are still around who have no clue what depression is like, or what goes on leading up to suicide. Hint: It's not what you think.
the AG offered a deal for zero (0) prison time, MIT refused to accept it.
How many people computer rooms did Google break into? none. How many people system did they hook an unauthorized computer to? none. How many systems did they put unauthorized software on? None.
"LAN is irrelevant these days. " not really. For example. this weekend I will be renting a house at the coast for 4 days with 15 other gamers. we do it 4 times a year, or so. Internet connection at these rentals run the gambit from shit, to crap.
The fact that you don't understand the difference between being online with someone and being in the same room is pretty damn sad. I would also add, when doing team play, being in the same room as your team is a hell of a lot easier to communicate then a headset. Not that it applies to many people.
What? It would cost more to do it your way. You wold need to make a complete game out of both, instead of one game with 2 features. In the end it would cost exactly the same.
It's a features I don't use in know way means it would cost less without the feature.
If you are going to be cheapo, then also be knowledgeable, else you will just bite yourself in the ass in an effort to save a penny.
I am defensive for several reasons: 1) the word taxes has become a knee jerk scare word. Being further seperated form services. Meaning peopel talk about cutting taxes, and everyone loves it. A politician saying that the result is loosing servcies, and everyone villifys them.
2) IT's about value.
3) France is the US's first and oldest ally. The US would not exist without France. The general anti-france meme in the US is short sight, unfair, and based in complete ignorance.
Then when people say ignorant shit like "France taxes the crap out of its citizens so we should have seen this coming." it just general irritates me. It is used to scare people. "You don't want to be like France, there healthcare means that are taxed really high!"
Slashdot Mirror
Except Reader was well used, entrenched in many industries, and support business needs.
Google needs to realize that ahving something that is important to the internet ecosystem is, in and of itself, valuable.
Seems to be? It's Google stated goal. Make everything searchable.
And I am fine with that.
And Google has been a great where privacy is concerned.
being incredibly helpful, intuitive and easy. I also look forward to it being canceled about a year after I depend on it.
Most pirates are casual pirates that wouldn't put much effort into it.
Some are determined, and you can't stop. But to say all are that way is ignorant of the pirate ecosystem.
The barrier of entry is an important factor with many things, piracy included.
But most poeple are a horrible gauge of what is fair.
I worked on a tool to be used by consultants. These people have very sticky fingers. Are issue was how to we prevent consultants taking the software to another firm?
We compiled a build for each customer with there logo inserted into various places. So when you run a report, no matter what there user entered, the embedded logo would appear on the reports.
Going to another accounting firm, and then generating reports for your boss with your previous companies logo on it tend to get you frowned upon.
Nothing.
Ans in the lab tiny, tiny, samples of simulate brain begin to act like a brain.
So if there is a very real possibility that simulating the brain may be enough to create what we would unmistakably call intelligence
We owe him a lot.. except for capitalizing his name, cause fuck that guy.
You mean Britain's suburbs? WaaaOOO!
Seriously? Let me explain with an example.
politician: Decides the streets need to be cleaned. So they create funding and hire street sweepers.
IN an interview thay woulod say "I tool the initiative in creting the street sweepers.
Now, do you think he is saying he generically engineered street sweepers, invented brooms and truck? Or do you think he is talking about making the funds available to have street sweepers?
This is high school level stuff. So either you are so wrapped up in a belief you can't actually be rational, or you can't even understand conversation at a freshman high school level.
Instead of praising him for taking the political risk to making ARPANET open, and calling it 'The Internet' , people like you need to come up with twisted ways to blame him for it.
Be smarter.
IT's more then that. I mean, you are correct, but there is a lot more to it.
It's not rigged in that you scenario doesn't really happen.
"r stealing private e-mails and passwords en masse, like Google"
asking for something from someone, and then they give it to you isn't stealing.
Dotcom committed crimes.
Stupid. Google has done many things to make people aware of privacy issues, and to even make ways to complete get off their systems.
Google history shows that it is well behaved in this area.
"I have my blinds up doesn't make it legal for you to stand in the street and watch my family dress ot bathe"
says who?
don't bother. doesn't matter it's a bad comparison.
To use you, stupid, analogy a bit better.
Its akin to pulling your blinds up, and then yelling out your window that it's ok for people to watch you family bath.
No, what he was threatened with was the result of MIT. MIT wouldn't accept a short, zero, term sentence deal.
This had nothing to do with the **AA
" Schwartz had credentials (permission) to access MIT's servers,"
No, he did not.
Do you know how those systems work at all? Let me give you na overview.
System A: Sends out broadcast saying "hey, here i am!"
System B: "I see you, can I connect?"\
System A:" can do the following: 1-"sure come on in!" 2-"Sure, just give me a password"
In these cases, System a chose 1 - "Come on in!"
Yes, it gets a lot more detailed, especially on the authorization side, but that doesn't matted becasue these system didn't ask for authorization.
And, in fact, it many places, what they did was not illegal. I would hard pressed to find a place where the scenro is illegal.
Now if they were using an attack to gather the password, or get around a password that's a different story.
". You know, computers communicate with each other,"
yes, and in this scenario the communication included 'Come on in!'
You have no idea about depression and suicide. So you look like an ignorant asshole
These situations aren't the same, but I do have Sympathy for Aaron.
Sadly, asswipe like you are still around who have no clue what depression is like, or what goes on leading up to suicide. Hint: It's not what you think.
Not that it keeps you from spouting your crap.
the AG offered a deal for zero (0) prison time, MIT refused to accept it.
How many people computer rooms did Google break into? none.
How many people system did they hook an unauthorized computer to? none.
How many systems did they put unauthorized software on? None.
These two case aren't remotely the same.
I suspect he's never been to a LAN party. or any party, really.
"LAN is irrelevant these days. "
not really.
For example. this weekend I will be renting a house at the coast for 4 days with 15 other gamers. we do it 4 times a year, or so.
Internet connection at these rentals run the gambit from shit, to crap.
The fact that you don't understand the difference between being online with someone and being in the same room is pretty damn sad.
I would also add, when doing team play, being in the same room as your team is a hell of a lot easier to communicate then a headset. Not that it applies to many people.
What? It would cost more to do it your way.
You wold need to make a complete game out of both, instead of one game with 2 features. In the end it would cost exactly the same.
It's a features I don't use in know way means it would cost less without the feature.
If you are going to be cheapo, then also be knowledgeable, else you will just bite yourself in the ass in an effort to save a penny.
It's nice to know that even people living in France can't fucking read the article.
France doesn'r relly have high taxes.
I am defensive for several reasons:
1) the word taxes has become a knee jerk scare word. Being further seperated form services. Meaning peopel talk about cutting taxes, and everyone loves it. A politician saying that the result is loosing servcies, and everyone villifys them.
2) IT's about value.
3) France is the US's first and oldest ally. The US would not exist without France. The general anti-france meme in the US is short sight, unfair, and based in complete ignorance.
Then when people say ignorant shit like "France taxes the crap out of its citizens so we should have seen this coming."
it just general irritates me. It is used to scare people. "You don't want to be like France, there healthcare means that are taxed really high!"