Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches 'Keep' To Rival Evernote

Today Google launched 'Google Keep', a mobile note-taking service to rival software like Evernote. It works on devices running Android 4.0 or later, and there's also a web interface (which is struggling under launch load as of this writing). Google describes the service thus: "With Keep you can quickly jot ideas down when you think of them and even include checklists and photos to keep track of what’s important to you. Your notes are safely stored in Google Drive and synced to all your devices so you can always have them at hand. If it’s more convenient to speak than to type that’s fine—Keep transcribes voice memos for you automatically. There’s super-fast search to find what you’re looking for and when you’re finished with a note you can archive or delete it." Fans of Google Reader will probably be a bit hesitant to pick this up.

205 comments

  1. Google Used to Innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember when Google used to innovate?

    1. Re:Google Used to Innovate by tftp · · Score: 1

      Remember when Google used to innovate?

      What are you talking about? This is pretty innovative. I would even say, it's a stroke of a genius!

      Just think about it. Millions of entrepreneurs will be sketching their own ideas and storing them on Google servers, where Google people can access them at will and "borrow" from, with no obligations to the author.

      I can think of only one enterprise that may come close in audacity: when a gang of thieves opens a bank.

    2. Re:Google Used to Innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The early bird gets the first worm.

      But it's the second mouse that gets the cheese.

    3. Re:Google Used to Innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google makes money from advertising, not selling software (ex. Microsoft) or hardware (ex. Apple). Their only interest is in keeping people online for ad exposure. Innovation is not what they're going for -- they are trying to create useful online services to develop a larger captive audience.

  2. No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll stick with colornote. At least they won't up and vanish, assuming gmail doesn't get pulled next :P

  3. I thought Google Kept Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...already.

    1. Re:I thought Google Kept Everything by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except for their products. They don't seem very interested in keeping those around.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  4. screw google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I will try very hard to never use new Google products. As they are a company that cannot be relied on to to support a product despite the number of people who become dependent on it. I have been already burnt by Google Notebook, and now Google Reader. They just decided to yank the product. Now they greedily crawl back in with Google Keep. You should not be keeping anything with Google if you really want to keep it for a long time. They are an untrustworthy company.

    1. Re:screw google! by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Make sure you ask for a refund.

    2. Re:screw google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If a refund means Google has to delete everything they know about me and can no longer resell my data to anyone, then sign me up, now.

    3. Re:screw google! by TC+Wilcox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Make sure you ask for a refund.

      Asking for a refund would be totally relevant if he was their customer. He isn't... He is the product and when your users are your product getting your users mad really can have consequences.

    4. Re:screw google! by Proteus · · Score: 2

      Maybe some compensation for all that personal data and advertising revenue they got from his use of Gmail? It's not like Gmail is provided at no value to Google (same with Reader, actually).

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    5. Re:screw google! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read the blurb, this is not really a "new" product, but rather an extension of Google Drive. If you use Google Drive, you already have the product.

      http://drive.google.com/keep

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:screw google! by mark-t · · Score: 3, Funny

      If people are their product, then wouldn't that make Google guilty of human trafficking?

    7. Re:screw google! by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      Um... Whoosh!

    8. Re:screw google! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      while the adults talk

      Says the AC stalker who can't formulate two sentences without swearing. I'm so impressed with your vocabulary.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:screw google! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The users are the customers and the product. It's not binary.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:screw google! by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      No, that wasn't a whoosh. He got it, and that was his answer.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    11. Re:screw google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last estimate I saw was that Google makes about $1 a year/customer for Gmail. And, yes, they have real significant capital requirements for running it. Not exactly a dream business - and threatening to leave is not going to really get much of a response.

    12. Re:screw google! by Geeky · · Score: 1

      I have a Google apps account, and use that for Reader. OK, I'm using the free version of apps, but it is a service you can pay for (and now have to pay for) and Reader was one of the features of that service. It soon won't be. Now, I'm sure the terms and conditions are nice and tight, and are probably limited to core applications like email and docs, but nevertheless, Google are removing a feature that some of their customers are paying for.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    13. Re:screw google! by chipschap · · Score: 1

      They also are dropping iGoogle, which is one of their most useful things. But after also getting burned with Notebook and to a lesser extent with Wave, I'm staying with Evernote ... which also works on my old Android 2.2 phone.

    14. Re: screw google! by Hellsbells · · Score: 2

      What does it matter if it is a paid service?

      Google has a history of dropping support for products suddenly, so why would anyone want to start using a product with a proven alternative, when its likely that in a year our two it will be suddenly dropped?

    15. Re:screw google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The users are the customers and the product. It's not binary.

      Customers usually pay for a service. Most of the people who use google's products aren't paying for that service. That is why I said they aren't customers.

    16. Re:screw google! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      They're pretty clear about core apps and add on apps on their site. Outside of the 6 core services I wouldn't count on anything to stay (I suspect Picassa is bulletproof though).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    17. Re: screw google! by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      Since it is part of Google Drive, it is less likely. Unless they close Drive, which seems to be a core component for them.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    18. Re:screw google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who write copy-cat applications will pick up where they left off and profit!

    19. Re:screw google! by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Maybe some compensation for all that personal data and advertising revenue they got from his use of Gmail? It's not like Gmail is provided at no value to Google (same with Reader, actually).

      Yeah, but that's the whole point of free web services. His compensation was free email, through a completely voluntary service with both other free and paid competition, where everyone going into it understands why it's free and it's clearly documented in the terms of service...

  5. Google Keep by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

    Fans of Google Reader will probably be a bit hesitant to pick this up.

    At least the headlines will be good.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Google Keep by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      There better be an export option.

      Evernote is just straight HTML. Your exports will look exactly like your notes in the program - which is extremely good in case we get word that they plan to shut down soon.

    2. Re:Google Keep by Geeky · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if Evernote's local database was in an open format - if it is, it's not obvious (there is an API, but I haven't investigated to see if there's a way to use it should the cloud side of the service go AWOL tomorrow). It's easy enough to export all of the notes into HTML, though, and doing that from time to time as a backup is probably a good idea.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    3. Re:Google Keep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had announced this before axing Reader all the comments would be different. This is hilarious, I don't think they realized they are hurting their image. Especially when the reader announcement was directed as a consolidation effort. Why would you introduce new services? It makes you look inept. I suspect reader was axed, cause the guys who pet project it quit. The rest is all spin.

    4. Re:Google Keep by Nixoloco · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would be nice if Evernote's local database was in an open format - if it is, it's not obvious (there is an API, but I haven't investigated to see if there's a way to use it should the cloud side of the service go AWOL tomorrow). It's easy enough to export all of the notes into HTML, though, and doing that from time to time as a backup is probably a good idea.

      The Evernote client already has a feature to export all the data from the locally stored notebooks/databases to HTML or to an Evernote XML file (which isn't that hard to parse). This is independent of the cloud export features. It includes notes and attachments. If that isn't enough, it looks like the local database is really just some SQLite DB's, so it wouldn't be that hard to write something to pull the data out directly.

    5. Re:Google Keep by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did say it was easy enough to export, but you have to remember to do that from time to time. If it's already in a readable format, you know it's always there. If it is just SQLite, that would be great, will have to investigate some time.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  6. Can't wait until next spring by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure that's when this will get the axe.

    1. Re:Can't wait until next spring by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can't wait until next spring. I'm pretty sure that's when this will get the axe.

      You're wrong. It already got the ax last summer (July 2012) when that service was called Google Notebook (or Google Notes). Google Notebook could already be shared between all your devices, and it wasn't just limited to the latest release of Android either.

      Why did you make this transition?

      We loved working on Notebook, but sometimes we have to make the hard decision to focus more of our efforts on products and technologies that will yield the most benefit to users in the long run. With all the great innovations and improvements to Google Docs in the last few years, we think it’s a great replacement for Notebook. http://www.google.com/googlenotebook/faq.html

      Personally, I just like PushBullet. It doesn't have all the functionality Google Notebook used to have, nor will it ever have half the functionality Keep will have (since it's really designed to push things to your devices, not really push things both ways). But I really like it. It's simple. It's elegant. And it just does the things I need it to do.

      And no, I don't know those PushBullet guys. I have no affiliation with them.

    2. Re:Can't wait until next spring by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I was a huge fan of notebook and you're right but that's the problem with notebook, I guess, in that google couldn't lock you into their OS.

  7. Software As A Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks.

  8. Google notebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I learned my lesson once.
    They were quick to kill that without actually thinking about it.

    Not only that, they have killed iGoogle and Google Reader without even thinking FOR A SECOND and stepping back to see how fucking EASILY both of them could be monetized. (which makes me think their excuse was a terrible lie at best)

    I'll use my own systems, thank you.

    1. Re:Google Notebook by Joshua+Fan · · Score: 1

      And Google Tasks? Which is a pretty recent product. I don't understand why they didn't just expand Tasks a little bit. Keep is kinda an awkward name.

    2. Re:Google Notebook by Geeky · · Score: 1

      I used tasks for a bit. It's still there, tucked away in email, but really needs work - it's very, very basic. I use Evernote for notes, but it doesn't do task management (mainly alerts). I'm looking at alternatives. Remember the Milk keeps coming up, but the interface is a bit dated and you have to pay for fairly basic functionality - the free version is fairly crippled. I don't mind paying, but only once I've tested. At the moment I'm giving Wunderlist an extended trial.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    3. Re:Google notebook by tlambert · · Score: 1

      I learned my lesson once.
      They were quick to kill that without actually thinking about it.

      Not only that, they have killed iGoogle and Google Reader without even thinking FOR A SECOND and stepping back to see how fucking EASILY both of them could be monetized. (which makes me think their excuse was a terrible lie at best)

      I'll use my own systems, thank you.

      Curious: How would you monetize Google Reader? It's an RSS reader, and RSS readers basically strip advertising, or can if you allow feed filtering - and if you don't offer feed filtering they are basically useless for RSS feeds.

      If you really think you can monetize the product, I suggest you start a company around the idea; I'm sure Google (or Amazon) will happily sell you App Engine services and storage for your new endeavor.

      I can see Google Keep at least fitting into their G+ Circles ecosystem as a means of getting people to post Facebook-like status updates by permitting their Google Keep contents to be see by their circles.

    4. Re:Google notebook by vux984 · · Score: 2

      How would you monetize Google Reader?

      Create a section for ad's on the page, and then put unobtrusive ads in them. Use the RSS feeds as keyword fodder to feed the ad placement engine. Sell ad placement via adsense... monetized.

      Cheque please... or should i rush to patent the above since its clearly a novel invention. :p

    5. Re:Google notebook by mr_exit · · Score: 1

      They already make a ton of money off RSS advertising. For most of my feeds, the banners are google adwords or google delivered banner adds.

      They make money off Reader just by being the ad network that everyone uses.

      --

      -------
      Drink Coffee - Do Stupid Things Faster And With More Energy!
    6. Re:Google notebook by tlambert · · Score: 1

      How would you monetize Google Reader?

      Create a section for ad's on the page, and then put unobtrusive ads in them. Use the RSS feeds as keyword fodder to feed the ad placement engine. Sell ad placement via adsense... monetized.

      Cheque please... or should i rush to patent the above since its clearly a novel invention. :p

      So I sync my feeds to local storage, and then go offline. How exactly do you contact the ad network for the monetization process again? Ad monetization is based on actual views, not on potential views, so even if you downloaded the ads to the device, there's no guarantee that I will see them, even if you place them in some out-of-band app-specific location, such a a piece of screen real estate you dedicate to the ads.

    7. Re:Google notebook by tlambert · · Score: 1

      They already make a ton of money off RSS advertising. For most of my feeds, the banners are google adwords or google delivered banner adds.

      They make money off Reader just by being the ad network that everyone uses.

      In-band advertising won't work, because the feed filtering allows it to be filtered as an undesirable article type on the RSS stream.

      The previous reply I made was to someone who suggested a real estate set-aside in the reader for advertising. This fails unless you make a SimCity-like always connected requirement to use the reader, since there is no way to do analytics on an out-of-band set-aside when the reader is being used offline.

      Neither one of you have demonstrated a viable economic model for monetizing an RSS reader. I'd argue that the answer to my question can never be "advertising", which might be some indication of Google's disinterest in maintaining it going forward.

      The only thing I could personally come up with is a subscription, with or without an up front cost, in order to use the application, since the sync data necessary to keep context and mark articles read/unread within individual streams requires a back end services infrastructure, including storage. Google Reader uses Google App Engine for this, and it's cost is likely one of about a dozen reasons it's being discontinued.

      Personally, I think the market for subscription applications is rather low, although Google appears to disagree, with Google Docs, and Microsft appears to disagree with Office 365. However, like Lotus Notes email, I'm rather certain that people use those because of corporate mandates, since AFAIK, they are typically despised by end users when those users are given a choice of using a native App instead.

      I personally would not pay a subscription fee for a App whose sole purpose is to act as a third party aggregator of other peoples content which I can get directly from the other people without paying a subscription to some middleman. At that point, the RSS reader becomes nothing more than a form-factor convenience item.

    8. Re:Google notebook by vux984 · · Score: 1

      So I sync my feeds to local storage, and then go offline. How exactly do you contact the ad network for the monetization process again?

      So what?

      Do you think google's monetization of web based email (aka gmail) is a flop since some users download email to local mail clients instead of using the online web interface with its ads?

      there's no guarantee that I will see them, even if you place them in some out-of-band app-specific location, such a a piece of screen real estate you dedicate to the ads.

      That is correct. Most people will use the web interface some of the time, if not all of the time, just like gmail. Which is working out fine for them.

  9. Cloud This! by girlintraining · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Why is there this rush to put everything in the cloud? Are you telling me that my device can't store a few bytes to kilobytes of textual data on it... that I need to download an online-only app to perform this most basic function? I mean, the IBM 8088AT class computers with giant 5.25 floppy drives had the ability to save text documents... and it didn't have a network connection.

    Oh right, I forgot: Data mining. All those juicy keywords. Mmm, delicious monitization of your private data... mmmyes, myes. I think I just had an evilgasm. Okay, nevermind... sorry, was trying to be logical here. Didn't see there was money to be had. Ignore my previous! Carry on!

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Cloud This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      are you intentionally being obtuse or is this really how short sighted you are? Did you even read the summary at all?

      One of the main points of cloud based note applications like Evernote and Google Keep is to keep notes automatically in sync between many devices. This along with local and remote copies ensure your notes do not get lost.

      Sorry to break your rant.

    2. Re:Cloud This! by Proteus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, Google's interest is certainly in getting data; but they wouldn't be able if there weren't a market for it. Why? I don't just use one device, so I want easy, transparent access to my data no matter what I'm using. And some of my devices are quite tiny; I don't want to lose my data when I lose my device, so I'd at least want some kind of automatic remote backup...

      Not to mention that things like Evernote do a lot of processing on the data you send them that would be onerous on a portable device. For example, if I snap a pic of a business card, the text on that card is OCR'd and made searchable. That would suck hard on a phone; it's much easier to offload that capability (and corpus!) to the cloud. This saves me precious battery and improves the quality of my results.

      The issue isn't network-based computing, it's that we don't have the controls in place to assert control of our data on a provider's equipment; we are forced to trust that they won't do Bad Things. And that's a problem.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    3. Re:Cloud This! by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I use onenote for my lab notebook and to keep ideas in. I back it up to the cloud. At conferences before, I've wanted to access those notes without my computer and have been able to. Plus, I can't be bothered to keep my backups up to date every time I enter something new, automatic backup is good. That way if my computer gets eaten by a mutant frog embryo, I'll still have all my notes. Or rather, the survivors will and will be able to figure out what went wrong.

    4. Re:Cloud This! by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      I don't just use one device, so I want easy, transparent access to my data no matter what I'm using. And some of my devices are quite tiny; I don't want to lose my data when I lose my device, so I'd at least want some kind of automatic remote backup...

      If that's all that "the cloud" offers, an encrypted solution so that only you have access to the data would be more user-friendly. But like I said... data mining.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:Cloud This! by Howitzer86 · · Score: 2

      I use a lot of highly complex 3d and graphical software for a living and for fun. Software that has a depth to it so deep there are people who specialize in using it and nothing else. There's so much to remember, that keeping notes available to me everywhere has been a must. First it was a Wordpad document in a USB stick, then later Google Notebook, then later a Wordpad document in Dropbox, then finally Evernote. I wouldn't want to go back to the USB stick.

      I imagine Google intends to use your Keep data to help target their advertising. The only thing that Evernote has ads on is their free edition, the privacy policy explicitly states that data collection for the purpose of advertising is limited to your username and email, and the ad in the free version of the app doesn't appear targeted to what I've given it.

      I'm getting beside the point - the "cloud" is great. Just be mindeful of your chosen service. Especially if it's free. Read the privacy policy.

    6. Re:Cloud This! by girlintraining · · Score: 0

      are you intentionally being obtuse or is this really how short sighted you are? Did you even read the summary at all?

      +3, Insulting. Nice one, mods. Meanwhile, back in reality... no, I was commenting on the fact that keeping things in sync between many devices could be done with a floppy disk as early as 1982, and that this new "service" is just another attempt at mining your personal data to be resold. My privacy is worth rather more than the convenience of "keeping notes automatically in sync between many devices." And even if I did fall on my head repeatedly and become stupid enough that I'd happily sell my soul for slightly more convenience, I would hope I would retain at least enough intelligence to use encryption.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    7. Re:Cloud This! by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Of course, being on google drive, "many devices" excludes any machine running linux, my that is convenient.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    8. Re:Cloud This! by BlackSmithNZ · · Score: 1

      " the fact that keeping things in sync between many devices could be done with a floppy disk as early as 1982"

      Er, no. I was around and using computers in 82 (as a school child admittedly) and you could not do this in 82 easily, nor in 92 or 2002

      My ZX Spectrum cassette tape had my bits of basic code on it. If I had stored a note 'remember to buy Apple shares in 20 years' and stored it on tape, I could not have interchanged it with pretty much anything else. Same as the school Apple II or BBC Model B computers, or the early IBM 5 1/4" floppies.

      I used to have a simple text document details lots of useful bits of info like passport numbers, user names and passwords, that I kept zipped and encrypted on my PC's from about 92 on-wards. Once I got an email account with an ISP in about 94, I emailed back and forth to various accounts so I always had the zip file handy and updated. Just checked and I still have a copy in Gmail from ~2004 (wow, didn't remember gmail being around nearly than 10 years).

      Thing is that now I use google docs and other cloud tools, I always have a totally upto date set of notes which are accessible from Android, Apple, Linux and Windows devices. Somebody could probably write a simple browser for a ZX Spectrum emulator running on a Raspberry Pi and I could read that same note.

      So the cloud very much has a place to enable this rather than sneakernet. Encrypt if you want, but you know that your Slashdot posts are probably being scanned and aggregated as well.

    9. Re:Cloud This! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm baffled to by this. But a lot of people seem infatuated with evernote. The cloud just does not seem inherently safe. Plus it's absolutely useless unless you connect all your devices to "the cloud". As soon as there's one device not on the cloud the naive users will complain that the device is obsolete or behind the times, no matter how advanced or irrelevant it is ("I synced from my phone to my watch, my tablet, and even my water heater after adding a wifi repeater, but my refrigerator won't sync up so I'm going to buy a new one").

      And seriously, how many people write themselves that many notes that need to be shared everywhere with dubious security? How many devices do they have? Phone plus work computer plus home computer. First off, terrible terrible idea to sync between home and work computer. Can just use a post it note, a flash drive, or just email yourself a reminder. The use case here is eluding me.

    10. Re:Cloud This! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was commenting on the fact that keeping things in sync between many devices could be done with a floppy disk as early as 1982,

      You're clearly either being intentionally obtuse, as GP noted, or else you have such poor reading skills that you didn't notice or understand the word "automatically" that was there in his comment.

      My privacy is worth rather more than the convenience of "keeping notes automatically in sync between many devices."

      So don't use it. A lot of people, myself and GP included, don't care about the privacy of simple notes while preferring the convenience of auto-sync. This service is for us. With your priorities, it's clearly not for you. Yet you were the one coming out to question other people's choices. Insulting, indeed.

    11. Re:Cloud This! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If this works like Evernote, all notes are stored locally on all devices and synced to the cloud - so you still have access even when you're offline.

      OneNote also has this ability, by the way, if you put its files on SkyDrive. You get the web client, the ability to open them in the usual Windows desktop app, and then you also get mobile apps for iOS, Android and WP. And all clients app also store the notes locally, and only sync them with SkyDrive when connection is available - so it still works online.

    12. Re:Cloud This! by thereitis · · Score: 1

      I would expect encryption with such a service as well. "trust me" doesn't cut it when ideas are patentable or otherwise require security.

    13. Re:Cloud This! by afgam28 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      keeping things in sync between many devices could be done with a floppy disk as early as 1982

      If you went back in time by 15 years, and suggested on Slashdot that keeping data in sync using a sneakernet was a better option than using the Internet, you would've been laughed at. I mean, that's what networks are for, and only knucklegrinders and noobs copy files around on physical media. But now, we don't call it a a "network" anymore, we call it the "cloud", and so therefore it's stupid?

      I know that the term "cloud" is overused and silly, but networks are a great piece of technology and remote storage often makes more sense than local storage. Especially for applications like this.

      Also, if you're concerned about data mining, Evernote don't do any data mining (or at least, that's what they claim in their TOS). Just because a service is on the cloud, doesn't mean that they are necessarily mining your data.

    14. Re:Cloud This! by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Why is there this rush to put everything in the cloud? Are you telling me that my device can't store a few bytes to kilobytes of textual data on it...

      Because you have multiple devices, and spending your spare time plugging them all into each other to sync them is a bit like passing punch cards around your development team when you could be using git.

    15. Re:Cloud This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't just use one device, so I want easy, transparent access to my data no matter what I'm using. And some of my devices are quite tiny; I don't want to lose my data when I lose my device, so I'd at least want some kind of automatic remote backup...

      If that's all that "the cloud" offers, an encrypted solution so that only you have access to the data would be more user-friendly. But like I said... data mining.

      Also, an encrypted copy would constrain the feature set to whatever was envisioned when the security model was defined, and would also make it impossible to implement a browser-based client without using something like Java, Flash, etc. -- and you still wouldn't trust it. I think Google made the right choice in simply forgoing usage by people who are bothered by targeted advertising.

    16. Re:Cloud This! by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      I mean, the IBM 8088AT class computers with giant 5.25 floppy drives had the ability to save text documents...

      A 5.25" disk wasn't a giant floppy back in the day, they were the small ones. It was the 8" disks that were giant.

      If you still want to carry around physical storage media and do the constant save, copy, save shuffle between your home computer, your work computer and your phone, be my guest. But I'll take the cloud every day and twice on Sundays for its ease and convenience.

      (I also, incidentally, have some faith that Google won't resell my personal data, as it would be completely contrary to their best interests. Google's business model involves getting every advertiser to use Google's own algorithms and data to achieve the best ad delivery to customers. Why would Google ever want to give out to others the information that makes it unique? Their plan, as far as I can see, is simple -- keep everyone using Google products for everything, and thus keep advertisers coming to Google. And if even that concept upsets you, you might as well pull the network cable from your computer, destroy your credit cards and have done with it. Paypal, Amazon and my credit card companies probably know more about my life than Google does, and they happen to know my address to boot ...)

    17. Re:Cloud This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm baffled to by this. But a lot of people seem infatuated with evernote. The cloud just does not seem inherently safe. Plus it's absolutely useless unless you connect all your devices to "the cloud". As soon as there's one device not on the cloud the naive users will complain that the device is obsolete or behind the times, no matter how advanced or irrelevant it is ("I synced from my phone to my watch, my tablet, and even my water heater after adding a wifi repeater, but my refrigerator won't sync up so I'm going to buy a new one").

      And seriously, how many people write themselves that many notes that need to be shared everywhere with dubious security? How many devices do they have? Phone plus work computer plus home computer. First off, terrible terrible idea to sync between home and work computer. Can just use a post it note, a flash drive, or just email yourself a reminder. The use case here is eluding me.

      You do know that Evernote stores content locally and OPTIONALLY syncs between devices via cloud storage, don't you?...

    18. Re:Cloud This! by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      OwnCloud is what you want if you want all the features the other people are pointing out, without the anal probe that is commercial cloud solutions. OwnCloud gives you a ton of cloud-like functionality using your own physical server which you are free to locate wherever you wish. It also offers encrypted transmission if you really are moving high-value information or if you're one of those paranoid types.

      --
      I hate printers.
    19. Re:Cloud This! by tech.kyle · · Score: 1

      Google likes Linux. If there isn't a client now, I would expect either comparable web functionality or a Linux client in the works.

      --
      If we colonize Mars, it won't be the World Wide Web anymore. UWW?
  10. Hard to trust by boshvark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure Evernote will not suddenly "retire" its service and leave users out to dry. Sorry, Google Keep. Even if you're everything I ever dreamed of, you've arrived at the wrong place and the wrong time.

    --
    There's always money in the banana stand.
    1. Re:Hard to trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you say that?

    2. Re:Hard to trust by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't trust Evernote either. It is their main line of business so it's unlikely to be "spring cleaned". But they can certainly go bankupt or bought by a rival and lose the cervice altogether. Or they can move in a direction that makes future versions bad or unusable for me. When it's the cloud you can never stay with a previous version.

      Anything critical, you use an offline app. Use the net only for syncing, preferably through file sharing or other system-agnostic manner.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Hard to trust by physicsphairy · · Score: 2

      Well, there probably is *some* extra security in that Evernote has less flexibility to migrate their engineers to other projects. However, that also means bad things if their app stops making money the most sensible thing may be to basically sellout their users (and potentially their data) to some other firm. They might be gobbled up by a larger company for other reasons and be taken in an unpleasant direction (see Sun->Oracle), or simply forced to declare bankruptcy, both of which are far less likely for Google. Basically, no matter who owns it, the software needs to be profitable to continue being supported, and there are some risks even if it is.

      I feel there is always some need to plan for the software you use being retired. Even if it's an open source project, if it's anything which involves integrating with other software/hardware, you are still going to have to abandon it if you continue updating your other software/hardware. (granted it is much easier for an OS project to find new maintainers)

      My principal question is if I can easily export my data, which google does tend to be pretty good about. Of course, I am still interested in how long I think it will be before I have to migrate, because migrating is annoying, but if it's a very compelling piece of software and I will be able to export my data from it, it's probably worth betting on the potential shelflife.

    4. Re:Hard to trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you say that?

      Hi, Eliza!

    5. Re:Hard to trust by countach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I trust Google's infrastructure more than Evernote's. It's hard to trust anyone's cloud staying around forever. Even Apple retired a lot of its old Mobile Me services. Who knows what parts of iCloud will be around in 5 years. Bottom line, cloud is great, but you have to keep your eye on it.

    6. Re:Hard to trust by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's why I have an automatic backup of all my data in the Google cloud.

      To another cloud. ~

    7. Re:Hard to trust by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      The Windows and OS X Evernote clients are, in fact, offline apps that use the net only for syncing. If the Evernote service where to goof up and corrupt all my data, I could restore it from my Time Machine backup. If Evernote were to go chapter 7 tomorrow and vanish, I'd still have all my data, which can be easily exported right from the client without an Internet connection.

      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
  11. Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there something similar before? Oh yeah, Google Notebook. We'll see how this version lasts...

  12. Fool me once... by rgbscan · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been burned by too many "non-core" Google applications to even be bothered to try this. I mean, look up the old Google Notebook. Basically the same thing. If it ain't search, advertising, or social.... it's only a matter of time till you get scroogled. (Funny I thought that was the dumbest MS campaign ever....but it's starting to grow on me).

    1. Re:Fool me once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Scroogling is bad but I've been Ballmered one too many times.

    2. Re:Fool me once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it makes you feel better, MS isn't the one who came up with the term 'scroogled'...

  13. note-taking by optikos · · Score: 1

    Where is the advertising in that?

    1. Re:note-taking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the advertising in that?

      Simple, search your note for text keywords, linked websites or images and pump out the AdWords on the side.
      No different to Gmail..

    2. Re:note-taking by endianx · · Score: 1

      It depends on the kinds of notes you take. If you are taking notes for a class, maybe not so much.

      If you are keeping a list of movies you want to see this year, or a grocery list, those could prompt ads, and is valuable information to sell.

  14. Google Notebook by CremIon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone remember Google Notebook...?

  15. So...Google Keep... by CremIon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...until it's Gone...?

    1. Re:So...Google Keep... by dclozier · · Score: 5, Funny

      At which point it will be renamed Google Kept.

    2. Re:So...Google Keep... by jockm · · Score: 1

      Yes because commercial products never fail, go out of business, or have the business pivot. Charging is no assurance of success.

      While it is sad to see Google Reader go, it is important to remember that it had a five year lifespan, which is an eternity for a webapp. Nor is your data locked in.

      I use Evernote because my clients use Evernote, but Keep looks rather nice.

      --

      What do you know I wrote a novel
    3. Re:So...Google Keep... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except Reader was well used, entrenched in many industries, and support business needs.

      Google needs to realize that ahving something that is important to the internet ecosystem is, in and of itself, valuable.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:So...Google Keep... by jockm · · Score: 1

      To which I say: So?

      I am going to go out on a limb and say Google thought about all of that and still decided that killing Reader was the right call. Just because other people rely on a product doesn't mean you should keep it going if there isn't a business case for it.

      Products die. I wasn't a Reader user, and I wish Google wasn't killing it, but I don't believe they should be forced to maintain every product they make in perpetuity either

      --

      What do you know I wrote a novel
  16. Lulz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they 'Keep' this one. Get it? 'Keep'

  17. No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fans of Google Reader will probably be a bit hesitant to pick this up.

    No, they won't, because they were fucking idiots trusting Google(*) in the first place.

    (*) That comment would also be valid for any of the major "cloud" (lol) players

    1. Re:No they won't by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Yes, I "trusted" Google to maintain the list of RSS feeds I am interested in. And given that it took me less than two minutes to export the data into nice readable JSON and XML, I don't think I made a mistake using their free service for the past few years.

      I think I can also "trust" Google Keep to hold onto those little things for when I need them, and let me export the important data when they're shutting the thing down in a few years. If I can't find a grocery list from 2 years ago, I think I'll be able to cope.

  18. No by oGMo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean when they made a search engine? Or a webmail client? Or online maps? Or office apps? Or an RSS reader? Or a calendar? Or a finance site? Or a chat program? Or a photo site? Or an online store? Or a social site? Or a phone OS?

    None of these things are "innovations", none of them were particularly innovative, and they weren't doing any of them first (or even early), but in many cases they were better/easier/free-as-in-beer-er than the alternative. Which is fine. And they made money on it. Which is great. And when they stop working (like Reader), we'll find something else, or write something else. Since they make getting your data out pretty easy, that's not even hard.

    And if you've become complacent where if Google doesn't offer it, you can't find it, that's not innovation... that's you being lazy. And it's not their fault, it's yours.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or other companies which come up with ideas, but are then unsuccessful with them.

    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit skipping chapters! That part comes in chapter six and we're only on chapter 1!

    3. Re:No by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I think people have different definitions of "innovate." I think this was covered on slashdot within the last few weeks... anyway, I think glass might meet my definition of innovative. For a tech company anyway. Different yardstick for those entities which must make a profit off of what new things they make.

    4. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And hopefully ends with chapter 11.

    5. Re:No by todrules · · Score: 2

      Google is great at taking an idea an improving.

      ... and then mohtballing it a couple of years later.

    6. Re:No by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i read about 'glass' about 13 years ago in a short story in a scifi magazine. but it was way more advanced. it also created persistent overlays of the real world and communicated with other 'glasses'. e.g. if i told my 'glass' to put a watch on my wrist, others with 'glass' could see it on my wrist too. same for a virtual picture on a bedroom wall, etc.
      the story unfortunately isn't in english http://www.scifi.sk/poviedky/80/Juraj_Andrassy-Ruzove_okuliare.html

    7. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think glass might meet my definition of innovative.

      The pedophiles and creepy stalkers are sure to love it.

    8. Re:No by geekoid · · Score: 2

      You need a dictionary.
      Wikipedia:
      "Innovation is the development of new values through solutions that meet new requirements, inarticulate needs, or old customer and market needs in value adding new ways.
      This is accomplished through more effective products, processes, services, technologies, or ideas that are readily available to markets, governments, and society.
      Innovation differs from invention in that innovation refers to the use of a better and, as a result, novel idea or method, whereas invention refers more directly to the creation of the idea or method itself.
      Innovation differs from improvement in that innovation refers to the notion of doing something different rather than doing the same thing better."

      innovate
        Use Innovate in a sentence
      innovate [in-uh-veyt] Show IPA verb, innovated, innovating.
      verb (used without object)
      1.
      to introduce something new; make changes in anything established.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:No by geekoid · · Score: 2

      People need to stop being stupid and letting the egos run amok not letting them say 'oh, I was wrong. That wasn't the correct word.'

      Innovation is simply changing existing technology or adding value to existing technology.

      Google Glass is an invention. Yes, it's also innovative. An invention is always innovative, but innovation doesn't always mean invention.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The Road to Innovation is not paved at all." old quote from a Sun T-shirt.

      Incremental improvements are not innovation. Innovation is doing something truly new that no-one else has done.

      (And it is usually potentially risky. Because a lot of things regardless of how many people do them are still no where near optimal and people on the whole are resistant to change for no sensible reasons.)

    11. Re:No by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0

      The pedophiles and creepy stalkers are sure to love it

      How so ??

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    12. Re:No by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      You mean when they made a search engine?

      Yes, when they made a search engine that worked so much better than the primitive search that everyone else was offering back then.

      By your argument, a car was not an innovation, since it's functionally just like a horse cart (except without a horse, and it goes faster, but that's not "particularly innovative").

    13. Re:No by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

      On several scifi shows, we have colonized the moon and several planets. I guess if we ever do that, you won't be impressed since you read a more advance fictional way of doing that 30 years before.

    14. Re:No by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a difference between writing scifi and making technology that works. The former is imagination. The latter is innovation.

      If you want an example of Google being innovative, though, look at their self-driving cars. A lot of people have tried to crack that problem. Google actually did it.

    15. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A search engine that ranked pages based on which other pages linked to that page was innovative at the time.

      The rest? Yeah, not so much.

    16. Re:No by gtirloni · · Score: 1

      You mean embrace and extend? Where did I hear that before?

      --
      none
    17. Re:No by queBurro · · Score: 1

      but we're cool with that bit, it's the extinguish bit we don't like

      --
      sag
    18. Re:No by hackula · · Score: 2

      Improvement is always incremental. If you think of an example of one that is not, you probably just do not know enough about what led to its discovery/invention. People outside the tech industry call people like Steve Jobs innovative for inventing the tablet and Mark Zuckerburg for inventing online chatting or whatever. Of course, anyone who knows anything about tech knows that both of those things have been around for decades in one form or another even though they appeared to come out of no where. The same thing happens when I talk to my Uni trained jazz friends about such and such virtuoso who I think is the best at X, Y, and Z; they typically laugh and roll their eyes because I am so clueless about how they are just copying so and so and this or that guy is so much better.

    19. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember all the google products that make money? Adwords that they stole (and subsequently paid for)?

      When they make something that approaches 10% of their revenue, let me know. The MS lock in tactics don't impress me.

  19. Can't trust Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    After they killed Reader, it's not pragmatic to use any of their services, given how they're prone to senselessly killing them off.

  20. Hightech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could program the same functionality within 24h it looks like a super useless service. Btw from my past experience with evernote I think Evernote is seriously not the contender for this. Looks more like a remember the milk minimal or stuff like that.

    1. Re:Hightech by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I could program the same functionality within 24h it looks like a super useless service.

      Said the AC.

      I don't have any real reason to start using Keep since I use a combination of a desktop program, a chrome extension and sync it all to Gdrive (and it all works nicely for me), but yes, please do write something up in 24 hours that can do what it does.

      I'm quite sure you're unaware of all that it can do, particularly on the android side of things.

  21. I plan on using it by linuxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many people here are pooh-poohing the new service for various reasons. I just wanted to provide a counter point.

    I tried evernote. I did not like it. I generally like the services Google provides and in the manner they do. I understand that nothing is guaranteed. And that one day this service may too disappear and I am OK with that. This is a price I am willing to pay.

    1. Re:I plan on using it by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Nice to see an alternative point of view.

      Clearly YMMV, but I find Evernote works very well for me on BB, iOS, Win...

    2. Re:I plan on using it by breid7718 · · Score: 1

      As a counterpoint... I used to make an effort to migrate to Google's services for the future potential. It seemed for a while there that Google never went down, continually integrated their services to allow interoperability and listened to its users to add features. Even if their offering was not as full featured as a competitor's, I would often migrate expecting them to improve, because they always did and it was not an untested company that might go out of business. I did this specifically with Drive, Reader, Contacts and Notebook. Apparently, now no service is safe. I understand it's an unpaid product and all, so I'll say thanks for the time I had with it. But I'm definitely not going to be migrating from a perfectly good service like Evernote or even text files in a Dropbox folder to this. The confidence isn't there anymore.

    3. Re:I plan on using it by fluffman86 · · Score: 1

      I'm in the exact same boat as you. Don't like evernote, but plan on using this. I mean, I'm pissed that Reader is dying, but they made it easy to get my data out. Same with notebook. I've tried Catch and Astrid on Android, and they never really synced well. When they did, I had to log into their site or jump through hoops to get the data into Google. Ever note (and recently the other two) are really busy, don't look as sleek and simple as Google apps, and have WAY more functionality than I need, so they take a while to open and connect and feel bloated. Google Keep, on the other hand, is lightweight and easy to use. And one day, I may have to export the data. And that's OK. I've already transitioned to TTRSS and I'll do it with Docs and Gmail if I have to.

  22. Isn't this just Google Notebook? by Proteus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, a slightly different interface, but substantially the same. And Google killed that product; why do we think this time around will be better?

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:Isn't this just Google Notebook? by Joshua+Fan · · Score: 1

      Um... try using it and see for yourself?

    2. Re:Isn't this just Google Notebook? by jockm · · Score: 1

      I would say this is a successor to Notebook. A much richer and better successor.

      --

      What do you know I wrote a novel
    3. Re:Isn't this just Google Notebook? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Um... try using it and see for yourself?

      It's not something you can "try", it's something that has to work for about five years going and give people assurance it will not be dropped. The aspectss you can "try" (like taking notes) are really not the point of concern.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Isn't this just Google Notebook? by Joshua+Fan · · Score: 2

      In that case, at least there is the assurance that Google has always given you plenty of heads-up and a good amount of time to migrate your data.

    5. Re:Isn't this just Google Notebook? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      In that case, at least there is the assurance that Google has always given you plenty of heads-up and a good amount of time to migrate your data.

      Or you could use Evernote today, and not ever have to migrate anything, with a wide variety of apps that consume or produce notes via an API.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by Aguazul2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if they realize that people who are now Readerless are going to avoid relying Google products/services in future. Certainly there is no way I would build life habits around any Google service now. You don't want to get too used to using anything of theirs, don't get too comfortable. Then they will wonder why their new products aren't taking off any more.

  24. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I currently use Google docs for basically identical functionality. I type a quick grocery or to-do list or whatever in Google docs, which I can then immediately access on any device (like my phone) which can access Google drive. If I want to avoid the horrible security bungle committed by Evernote recently, I can type it as a text or whatever and encrypt it before storing it on Google drive. The added bonus to this is that Google then won't have the ability to make money off me by mining through my data (this data anyway).

  25. Count me out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really not comfortable giving google any more of my data than they already have.

  26. Tie to Google Drive is probably a good sign by Erbo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The fact that Keep is tied to Google Drive is probably a good sign for its longevity. Google probably wrote it using the same APIs via which third-party applications use Drive to store data, and Drive appears sufficiently "core" to Google and a variety of other Google initiatives (Chrome OS and Android among them) that it'll stick.

    Disclaimer: Part of my impression comes from having attended the Google Boulder Open House last night, where they gave presentations on the projects they run from the Boulder office, of which Drive is one.

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
    1. Re:Tie to Google Drive is probably a good sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Reader can go so can everything else certainly including a note-taking app.

    2. Re:Tie to Google Drive is probably a good sign by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Drive appears sufficiently "core" to Google

      Not core enough to deploy on a linux platform in a timely manner. Put the source up on github and let the community troubleshoot the porting issues. It'd be nice if Google (or someone) established a repeatable BPM (Business ProcessManagement) for writing and deploying to multiple distributions.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    3. Re:Tie to Google Drive is probably a good sign by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      The notes don't show up anywhere in Drive, so they must not be using the standard APIs. It's a little disappointing.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  27. This is a rival? by Dave+Emami · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've used both Evernote and Springpad, and stuck with the latter, but after fiddling around with the web interface on Google Keep for a while, my question is: this is supposed to be a rival service? It looks more like something from the example page of a web app library. All you seem to able to do is enter text notes, and lists. Perhaps Keep for Android has more functionality, but just comparing between the web versions of all three, Keep doesn't have 1/10th of the capability of either of the others. It's like comparing Word with Notepad.

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    1. Re:This is a rival? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An example app has voice transcription? Simultaneous multi-device editing, cross-platform?

      The one thing that I'm surprised Keep lacks, given that it's clearly built on Drive, is sharing. My wife and I now use a Google Doc for our shopping list, because we can both see and modify it at will, on multiple devices, but the Keep UI would be much better suited to that. I'm sure sharing will be added; it's such an obvious major improvement and the infrastructure to make it work is there.

    2. Re:This is a rival? by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

      An example app has voice transcription? Simultaneous multi-device editing, cross-platform?

      As I said, I was comparing between the web versions, not having checked out the Android version yet. Now that I have, my opinion remains the same. To take the items you mention, one by one:

      Voice transcription: that's part of the Speech to Text API of the OS. Based on a quick search of example apps, you're talking less than ten source-code statements to do the transcription. Major kudos to the API writers for making it that easy to use, but the coding required of the Keep team is very much demo-app level difficulty.

      Simultaneous multi-device editing: that's part of the Google Drive API. The example Android app in the Google Drive documentation does everything that Keep does except for the checklist (which is just a custom display widget) and voice transcription (which could be added to it in a few minutes, as mentioned above). The rest is just a little UI polish.

      Cross-platform: there's an Android example app for Google Drive. There's a web-based example app (more than one, actually). There's a Java one and a .NET one.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Keep is bad. It's an excellent demonstration of the power and developer-friendliness of Google's APIs, but a competitor to Evernote or Springpad, it's not. Even leaving aside that comparison, I've seen more-ambitious apps in various "How to Program Android" type of books. And I expect a bit more from Google. They made this with their own foundation and building blocks. They should get more-impressive results than this when playing on their own turf.

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  28. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by fwarren · · Score: 2

    Yes they know they will loose a lot of us Google Reader users trust But not many people used Google Reader. The total number of Google Reader users who will drop all Google based products plus everyone the can influence to do that same thing, is not a very large number. If it costs them 100,000 users I would be surprised.

    --
    vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  29. Since they have now have "Find" and "Keep".... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Funny

    All they need now is services called "Lose" and "Weep".

    1. Re:Since they have now have "Find" and "Keep".... by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      All they need now is services called "Lose" and "Weep".

      Judging by the other comments i think they already have that covered. I believe they were codenames for Google Notebook and Google Reader.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  30. Actually, I can deal with this by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    Reader fans can liberate their data and they've had years of free service. I know, because I am one. But if making pissy comments on a /. article makes you guys feel better, who am I to deprive you of that?

    Consider this: would a company dedicated to RSS, in the way that Evernote is dedicated to notes, have been able to maintain a free service for as long?

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
    1. Re:Actually, I can deal with this by joh · · Score: 1

      Why free? How can such a service that requires servers and bandwidth be "free" anyway?

      I would gladly pay for Google Reader. I don't understand why they didn't just limit it to users of payed Google Apps accounts as they did with EAS support.

  31. Attract, Advertise, Abandon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We used to complain about Microsoft's "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish", and rightly so. But Google has its own version.

    If there's a word beginning with 'A' meaning "Mine Personal Details", it belongs right in there too.

  32. Forget watch, I want a smart brace by BlueCoder · · Score: 0

    I want a smart brace. A double sided or all the way around smart phone/tablet for my lower left arm/wrist. It would only be bad for playing games. Paired with a Bluetooth headset it's a perfect PIM (personal information manager) form factor. The larger surface area around your lower arm also allow for a much larger battery capacity. Sometimes I might want to access apps horizontally from the top of my wrist and other times vertically from below. Very hard to lose. I can easily see it taking 20% of the smart phone market. With possibly a phablet taking over a third of the rest.

    A wrist brace would have a light weight screen and concentrate more on battery life and being a hub for the rest of your devices rather rather than a platform for high end graphics games and high frame rates. A hub both for a communications link and concentrated local data storage. A more utility oriented smart phone.

    It would also pair well with the Google glass or and implanted glasses.

  33. Re: Evilgasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, so you get to think dirty evil thoughts while you have fun dirty evil things done to you, and you can get an everlasting evilgasm?

  34. Problem here is over specialisation by technicalnotebook · · Score: 1

    The biggest issue I see with Google is that they like to tease the waters with these services, things like the recently retired Google Reader, they will put it out there, decide that they are not getting enough interest and then retire it. Google needs to look at what they do and keep doing it well, not trying to target every aspect of the market. Personally I would FAR prefer to put my data into Evernote, as I know they will hang around, Google Keep... meh we will see how long until it goes. The things google innovate on, THEY hang around, the things that Google follow on... tend to get flushed after a while. Just my 2c.

    --
    Hit me up on twitter @StuartCRyan
  35. But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why would someone choose to use this over EverNote or OneNote, both of which have established, mature Android clients?

    Especially since it's unlikely that Google is going to release a non-Android version. With OneNote and EverNote, I have a native client on every device I own.

  36. Sigh... by joh · · Score: 2

    I'm a bit torn right now between two ways to go on:

    a) I set up servers of my own for everything (I still have an SMTP and IMAP server for email, never trusted Gmail) like calendars, contacts, documents, notes, etc. Lots of work to set this up, a bit of money, fear of it being not secure enough if I don't put in more work and time.

    b) Just throw myself at Google and accept that every odd year a service I used and love will be gone and I have to find a new home for it after exporting and converting my data (as I have to do right now with Google Reader and the >100000 starred articles in it). Hardly any work at all, Google reads all my data.

    My anger says a), my lazy soul says b).

    But I surely don't love Google. By the way, nice article here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jw_on_tech/archive/2012/03/13/why-i-left-google.aspx

    Wait... has this thing any protocol or API to access this with other apps? Or is it again Google/Android/Browser or nothing?

    1. Re:Sigh... by cockroach2 · · Score: 1

      I was in a similar siatuation a while ago and chose to host everything on my own. Sure it means a bit of work (and I have to admit I'm not quite done yet) but if you enjoy sysadmin stuff it's not too time-consuming and you might be able to learn something, i.e. I chose to use FreeBSD which I'd never used before. Plus things like owncloud should make calendar and contacts synchronization quite simple without relying on third parties to keep their services running.

      Of course the major downside is that you will have to do backups and hard drive replacements on your own. With a reasonable RAID configuration and using one of the many cloud storage providers for (of course highly encrypted) backups that shouldn't be too bad though.

      Or you could do something in between, i.e. rent a "server" from somebody like amazon or gandi if you don't want to worry about hardware.

      To me, the small amount of work and money that is required to run my own infrastructure is certainly worth it not to have to trust a third party with my data, plus running your own things gives you great options for random hacks and fun little projects.

  37. I give it a year. by asm2750 · · Score: 1

    Then Google will decide it's not worth keeping and tell everyone they will be killing it a year later, just like they do with all the products these days.

  38. How I learned about Evernote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True story. I was on my way to pay the power bill (pay in cash at K-mart, save a stamp) and looked up and saw a building with their name and logo on it. I made a mental note to find out what they were, since I'm obviously interested in things going on in Si Valley, where I still live.

    I looked over their site and my first thought was, "this company could disappear and I wouldn't care". There are a lot of companies like this in the Valley, so it's a bit of a knee-jerk reaction for me.

    In fact, I feel I've become just a bit too cynical about it all so I decided to play devil's advocate. The first thing that came to mind was the progression of literacy. Literacy ended the need for people who recited geneologies, land titles, and various other things in towns. As soon as it could be written down, human memory became less practiced; but that was OK because it could be devoted to other things.

    Literacy is power and progress; but there is always the concern that any form of progress will just be a crutch that causes our brains or bodies to atrophy. To wit--we no longer do as much physical labor; but we now pay gyms $30/mo so we can perform physical labor.

    So. Is something like Evernote a utility that will expand the power of the human mind and allow us to achieve new things for the benefit of mankind, or is it just something that will make our memories atrophy so that we have to do brain puzzles to prevent early-onset Alzheimers? Will we end up paying $30/mo to some mental gym to counteract that atrophy?

    I don't know; but it's an interesting experiment we're doing on ourselves, and I'm in the "control" group that doesn't use this technology.

  39. Simplenote by joh · · Score: 1

    Simplenote does the same (very simple notes), it is free and it has real clients for all platforms. Many of them.

  40. oh great another web app by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

    Wonder if there'll ever be native clients for anything besides Android. I'm not even going to begin to think of touching this until there are - I really love that Evernote isn't stuck in my browser.

    Also, yeah, not sure I trust Google to not abandon this like they did Reader or Wave. And not so hot on importing two and a half years of notes into Google, either.

    --
    egypt urnash minimal art.
  41. Cloud great, proprietary products bad by joh · · Score: 1

    Why is there this rush to put everything in the cloud? Are you telling me that my device can't store a few bytes to kilobytes of textual data on it...

    If you note down something on your computer and then you're on the road and want that note, what do you do? And yes, there are ways to do this, but I'm using Simplenote (much better than this Google thing, free and dozens of clients and scripts and whatnot for all platforms) since a few years and I can tell you that it makes a GREAT difference to have your notes available everywhere and all the time without any effort. Note down a book title, an IP address, some serial number, whatever, and have it available everywhere.

    The problem is not the cloud. The cloud is great. The problem are monopolies like Google that offer no standard protocols with an RFC number and accept no third-party implementations of their APIs and protocols and servers. THIS is the problem, not "the cloud".

    The web is in the cloud, email is in the cloud. But these have protocols and standards and are not just proprietary products. The fact that you have to explain and preach that over and over and people STILL think that there ist just "have everything saved on your dusty PC or give everything to Google Facebook" is crazy. Are people really that dumb?

    Hell, you're not reading that from your PCs HD and you're not writing your comment to it. You read it in the "cloud" and your write it to the "cloud".

    1. Re:Cloud great, proprietary products bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you note down something on your computer and then you're on the road and want that note, what do you do?

      Uh, you pull it up from that NFS share you've exported over your VPN. No need for 'the Cloud'.

  42. CALDAV access ? or calendar ? by johnjones · · Score: 1

    so its a task list...

    can I sync it with my task's for calendar via standards such as CalDAV ?

    otherwise forget about it

    John

  43. Remember Google Notepad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Make product
    2. Users like product
    3. users hate when it is taken away
    5. step 4 is secret
    7. maek new product to replace old one
    8. blogosphere rejoices at new product
    9. ??????
    11. PROFIT

  44. Sarifice Privacy by rbrightwell · · Score: 1

    Google's mission seems to be to gather data on everything about everything (and everyone). Gmail is never deleted. Why would I give them all my notes? I trust Evernote with my privacy more.

    1. Re:Sarifice Privacy by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Seems to be? It's Google stated goal. Make everything searchable.

      And I am fine with that.
      And Google has been a great where privacy is concerned.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  45. I looo forward to this by geekoid · · Score: 1

    being incredibly helpful, intuitive and easy. I also look forward to it being canceled about a year after I depend on it.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  46. So .... by tgd · · Score: 1

    Its OneNote Online.

    With 10% of the features.

    And they scan my notes.

    And they'll probably kill the service in two years.

    Yeah. Skip.

    1. Re:So .... by reverius · · Score: 1

      OneNote is already online, through SkyDrive: http://skydrive.com/ The native OneNote clients for various devices already talk to the SkyDrive cloud service and store your notebook(s) there by default, as far as I can tell.

    2. Re:So .... by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      One reason not to use OneNote. (Based on Xxxxxx Internet use policies, access to this web site ( http://skydrive.com/ ) has been blocked because the web category "Online Storage and Backup" is not allowed.)

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    3. Re:So .... by tgd · · Score: 1

      One reason not to use OneNote. (Based on Xxxxxx Internet use policies, access to this web site ( http://skydrive.com/ ) has been blocked because the web category "Online Storage and Backup" is not allowed.)

      Using another option to bypass your company's rules seems like a good route to get fired.

  47. Smaller companies more reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I could go with Google who are making this product as a half-cocked side thought. Or go with a company with a solid track record whose companies lifeblood is this type of software - and nothing else.

    Google will cancel the product in one year and Evernote will be continuing to improve theirs - which would you choose.

  48. "A bit hesitant" is one way of putting it by Trashcan+Romeo · · Score: 2

    If Google couldn't find a way to wring enough greenbacks out of Reader, what chance does this have?

  49. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    Reader? How about Wave and Knol. Google just sticks everything they can think of out there, to see if it immediately turns into money. If it doesn't, they shut it down.

  50. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    It's not just the number of people who stop using Google's services that they have to worry about. Every time they drop support for something, they are signaling to people that putting your data into a new Google offering is risky business.

  51. Or you can try the following combo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SSH + git + org-mode FTW

  52. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by joh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, but let me tell you that users who used Google Reader are those who read and write a lot. Each of them is easily worth 10 plain users. I was burned by that and right now I'm busy moving quite a few users and one business away from Google. Google kicking out ActiveSync and in six months CalDAV isn't exactly helping them here. Google is starting to feel somewhat uncomfortable all of a sudden. There has been a widely felt uncomfortable feeling about Google's potential to abuse their power for quite a while but all of this is the first time Google makes this potential into something you have to deal with. And this is not a good feeling.

    Google is changing right now. Even those working there notice that. Google is dropping right now all the attributes that made nerds comfortable with it. It is turning into something else.

  53. Google is dropping CalDAV by joh · · Score: 1

    In six months CalDAV support will end.

    1. Re:Google is dropping CalDAV by Desler · · Score: 1

      Whooosh.

  54. Choose the Lazy C by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    C) Use Evernote, gain all of the benefits of Google but be a lot more assured it will stick around.

    And yes there's an API.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Choose the Lazy C by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Agreed.. I actually like OneNote better, but as a regular user of windows, mac, linux and android.. Evernote is really the only one that's everywhere I need it to be... I really with DropBox on Linux was a bit better... will be interesting to see what comes out of their APIs... if they had a hosted app service USERNAME.dropboxapps.com or something similar, where they "run" your apps (say written in python or nodejs), that would rock... and probably a more stable environment long run.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  55. Key is "maintain service" by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Consider this: would a company dedicated to RSS, in the way that Evernote is dedicated to notes, have been able to maintain a free service for as long?

    A free service? No. Instead they would have charged, and everyone would have known a lot sooner if that was practical. I would far rather pay a small amount of money for a service I like because it provides a lot more certainty that thing will stay around.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  56. The prototype by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I want a smart brace. A double sided or all the way around smart phone/tablet for my lower left arm/wrist.

    Pretty sure you mean this.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The prototype by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

      Too much like a watch. I want it wide and almost 360 around my arm.

  57. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by JuicyBrain · · Score: 2

    I used to use iGoogle, then they took it from me.
    I used to use Google Notebook, then they took it from me.
    I used to use Google Reader, then they took it from me.

    If it wasn't for that, I'd probably be excited to hear about their new product, but I'm not. Not anymore. I will not use Google Keep especially because I do not want to get used to it so they can take it away from me. I'm done.

    So you can count me in that group Aguazul2.

  58. Why android 4 and up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Argh

    There's nothing wrong with older hardware, no reason it couldn't run this. Its just being held back by manufacturers refusing to update their products - and google's tacit support for it.
    So my beloved Galazy Tab p1000 (first generation Samsung tablet) is stuck on 2.3 gingerbread. (I know there's a cyanogenmod for it but its apparently buggy as hell, IE camera non functional etc) while there are newly released, less powerful phones and tabs running Android 4+ (512meg of RAM and a 1ghz single core processor is still ahead of mid-range or low end smartphones....) but its now obseoleted by software

  59. Great simple app by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    Though my confidence in Google is declining after the Reader fiasco (which i don't use or care myself, i think RSS is overrrated, but i can empathize with people), i installed it and works great. Simple way to create notes and task lists, and you can dictate notes, which worked flawlessly with the spanish language.

    Being cloud based means i can get a new phone and all notes will be there.

    I am using colornote at the moment

    1. Re:Great simple app by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I tried it, too, and it seems pretty decent. Simple, easy to use, nice widget that expands easily, ties to Google Drive for easy access elsewhere. :)

  60. Parent post should not be rated flamebait by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I was a huge google fan, got several google certifications.

    But the parent post is correct. Google drops popular apps all the time. It's hard to commit a lot of time and effort to a google app, just to have google pull the rug out from under you.

    Also, google makes practically all of it's income from advertising. Anything else, google seems to make a half-hearted effort. Ever use Google apps? They are barely usable, and google does not seem interested in fixing long standing bugs.

  61. just another thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for you to get used to, perhaps even rely upon, before it goes tits up. best to skip free services (not just of google's either) of things that could be done yourself..

    a third-party will just eventually discontinue the service, get hacked, or read your private content.... in this case, at least 2 of those three apply with google keep.

    captcha: avoided

  62. Ironic name by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Ironic name "Keep" since Google rarely "keeps" apps around anymore. No more iGoogle, reader, and others. How long before Keep isn't kept anymore?

    1. Re:Ironic name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they realized that bandwidth actually does cost money and there is a thing called money. It took about 3 generations of finance advisers to finally get into Page's head that you can't go around and just create anything and crown the #1 spot for it and expect money to just flourish.

  63. Only a fool would trust Google products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have "killed" too many different projects in recent years
    for a sensible person to even remotely consider using an app
    from Google.

    Of course some people are stupid, and for them there is ... Google.

  64. Nope. by Seumas · · Score: 1

    The problem with a service from Google is that -- despite them being huge and likely being around forever, unlike small shops that could succumb to financial problems down the road -- you still can't trust that it'll be around in a year. And if you run into any problems, good fucking luck getting a human being to help you. Even if you're a paying customer.

    I had entries in my RSS feed that were stuck as unread for three years. Absolutely nothing would nudge them out of there. It was annoying.

    Oh, and their interfaces often suck and are incomplete and don't work very well with each other (go have a look at Google Drive/Docs/whatever it is this week).

    I'll stick with Evernote, thanks (and I am someone who once liked the idea of just caving in and letting Google be my go-to spot for all my main services, instead of having them spread apart ten totally separate places that did things ten different ways and didn't interact at all).

  65. You got it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you really want Google to delete everything they know about you, go to accounts.google.com and click the link that says "Close account and delete all services and information associated with it."

    Google already cannot resell your data to anyone. You made that part up.

  66. No more by Trikoloko · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know google products are free yadda yadda, but the demise of reader is too bitter to forget. I feel for Google, because they made the best web apps by far. However, they have been messing with things that were perfectly fine (Gmail and calendar interface, for example). Only time will tell, but they might have just jumped the shark and we simply haven't recognized that yet.

    --
    My cellphone ringtone is a ring tone.
  67. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is so much demand for Reader create a service and profit!

  68. Microsoft shills, please fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world would be such a better place without these low life piece of shit.

  69. Misguided fanboism by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever google is criticized for yanking a "free" service, such comments come up. but is anything from google free? Sure its may not ask for money, but in google your eyeball is the product, and they make money from ads.
    Lets take gmail.
    Now its free. If google yanks it, many people will troll "it was free" "ask for a refund".
    But when I open gmail, I see ads. So in a way google is making money.
    No company is in it for charity.;
    And no company is above criticism. There is nothing wrong to feel bad or criticize the company if it cans a product you were dependent upon. "Ask for a refund" what kind of response is that. And just because its pro google, it gets modded to "insightful"!

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:Misguided fanboism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gmail is a product that works and people use on a daily basis. It is something they would never pull. Reader is a niche thing that the majority of people didn't even know existed. If they ever pull Gmail or Google+ or Google Search or YouTube then we'll talk. Those are their core products, not Reader or all that other crap under "More".

    2. Re:Misguided fanboism by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      People pay for GMail (I do, for my company's App account). I know lots of people pay for Drive, and Keep is part of Drive (we use Dropbox).

      These are not free services... there are just free versions out there with serious limitations. Those limitations are okay for light personal use, but there are lots of people paying monthly for those services, including the one that Keep is part of.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  70. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by 19061969 · · Score: 1

    I've heard of x10 developers before, but not x10 users!

    --
    bang goes my karma... again...
  71. Google doesn't sell your data by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1

    Google is one of the few big "social" companies around that never resell users' data to any third party. Read those big legal blobs before clicking "I accept".

    --
    There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    1. Re:Google doesn't sell your data by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      That's true, but only because it helps them maintain their ability to sell the processed results of that data: your ad target-ability. If their partners knew what they knew, there's no reason to keep using adsense, you could go to any internet advertiser.

    2. Re:Google doesn't sell your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should go re-read it, because they specifically allow themselves to share your data with anyone they wish.

  72. Re:Fool me once... don't get too comfortable by Woek · · Score: 1

    You just perfectly worded how I feel about it! For me it started with iGoogle (for which I still haven't found a replacement), but that was just (for me at least) a single incident This Reader move makes it a clear trend. It doesn't help that apps I paid for rely on this service.

  73. Six months by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    till it's merged into Google Plus to artificially inflate G+'s claimed user numbers.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  74. Google Keep Death Pool Thread by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Place your bets. We'll come back here when it's canceled and see who got closest. Winner gets a fractional bitcoin.

    I'll start: 2016-02-29

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  75. Will I have to get a Google+ to use it? by noldrin · · Score: 1

    I've recently migrated most of my online cloud docs away from Google to Evernote because Google has been getting continuously creepier. Recently they have been trying to shove Google+ down my throat, which demands my real name. I plan to continue this trend with moving to a new email service and a new search engine. I love their products, but they are determined to drive me away from using them.

  76. SpringPad Is Better by hateflyy · · Score: 1

    IMO Springpad is better than all of them combined. Then again, it also seems like it tries to be like PT in a way.

  77. gmail, drive, search, Android: that's it by stenvar · · Score: 1

    I think the only Google products you can rely on sticking around at this point are gmail, drive, search, and Android. Anything else is prone to ending up on the chopping block. One has to wonder what the reason is for all this frugality at Google...

  78. Google Keep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll keep ... I'll just continue to use Growly Notes or TextWrite to keep all my ideas in.

  79. What's wrong the defunct Google Notebook??? by mcorrea · · Score: 1

    What's all different from the defunct "Google notebook", without any improvement in years... still a better choice. Google need to re-think their way to kill applications.