What "I" want/would pay for...is anecdotal. The chasm between Broadcast and Distributed prevails. "You" don't watch such'n'such but advertisers have bet dollars others do. Circling the dial is indicative and instructive of what humanity you share inclusive of age, taste and intelligence. The math used to measure and maximize the behavior of a demographic is a battle of trade secret equal to military campaign.
teaches more. Doom + Myst isn't a magical formula for learning unless the plan is to populate Second Life. But an open source, immersive environment is exciting if, say, Powers of 10 is the bar. Doesn't virtual reality promise means of illustration limited only by imagination? Game environments seek to temper all the running around (that is so fun) with puzzles that are, in a way, signatures of what abstract thinking skills its players possess.
Morality is a code determined by the interpretation of a text. Ethics are a code of behavior to which a group agrees and continues to evolve. Ethics is a present consensus. I agree with the post in regard to how the term is tossed around, but would warn against the semantic of "concepts of right and wrong." That people have differing values and opinions is what drives the study and application of ethics, not what limits it.
My point is the poster claims to myth bust and his very terms are machoistic metaphor. Your own diction, such as bitchy, pretends to communicate beyond insinuation in a tone of superiority. My point is beer swelling, caffeinated tech-heads loooove to believe the contentions of gender are a two-way street...when on this very day, King Spam commited the kind of murderous control typical of a man's psyche, but is far less common of women. And by the way, maxume, blather is an aural adjective and fountain usually implies the written word. That's a mixed metaphor-- hack.
A root cause you'll never hear about IF "you" are a conceived audience of feminist troglydites...and voila...women are once again "really" what is? keeping culture stagnant...as far as VICIOUS...really? as in what a woman will SAY? versus the propensity for a testerone heavy humanoid to execute gunpowder, fire, blunt and sharp instrument and muscular advantage? Insight into human behavior IS gender savvy, but illustrating the subtlety of verbal power struggles with a metaphor of CUDGEL???...this argument is as idiotic as the Harvard guy that started this nonsense for which he should have been decapitated Saudi style...to exagerrate MY point
The Russians have an appreciation for an "idiot". If you have facts to describe, describe them. Insulting the author of the post to which you're responding is one way to "fuel" your fire, but it's not going to make your argument any more lucid, useful or correct.
Your analysis proffers the "widget" as your economic/transactional model but taxes are applied to products and services of which people depend: food, water & power, heating oil, clothing, gasoline, and on and on.
Sadly, proffering the widget as your central model is how children are first introduced to economic models in programs such as Junior Achievement or an introductory Economics class on a typical American university campus.
You've confused market models with public policy and are prone to zestful, robust promises of a labor-absent, capitalist propaganda.
So, let us see...suppose an individual had some indication that they were being harassed by sharply dressed men in neighborhoods where they might not usually be...and suppose an individual had made a FOIA request, but the request had gone ignored because a US citizen without the consult of a barraster or esquire or lawyer dude isn't really a recognized citizen by anyone Hey, everyone knows you had better lay out some bucks if you want sweet Justice to wear a blind.
Now, I wonder if the FOIA documents bequeathed by so audited and transparent an entity that might exist under the unitary executive's thumb of late
I wonder if the names of those targeted by what is called "exquisite intelligence" is redacted.
I wonder if, in the beginning, but a few troublesome individuals were bullied and threatened by implication and a "the gloves have come off" mentality felt the need to bureaucratize its systemic abuse and broaden its number of transgressions to make an acute elision of the Constitution's spirit merely a matter of numbers.
To lessen the legal ramifications...turn a shoot-out into a civil lawsuit, knowing full well (Senior Justice: "Well, well, well") citizens can't very well sue its govenment as redresses of grievance are CLEARLY covered in the Constitu- tion.
I wonder...is my name among redacted? And what FOIA's price is to be paid to find out?
"If two people walk towards each other and pass each other in the hall, that would be essentially identical to them walking up to each other and turning around - identity obfuscated."
i'm unsure humans do, but as to the topic of this thread, Mit has clearly been given a blow
I suppose your argument lies in the term "access" as when you sign on to the bank's servers, you have "entered" a bank and to what party a responsibility of security is assigned is the literal argument you so damn with time.
This very question has already been addressed by the Securities and Exchange Commission... http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/15/business/15norris.html?_r=1&oref=slogin with a decision with which, I might infer from this quickly modded post, you profanely contend.
I would pose the question as to the greatest likelihood of fraud that might go undetected. A bank blaming an individual, of which there would be potentially hundreds of thousands to consider or an individual blaming a bank, fewer in number, properly regulated and inspected.
Moreover, given the advantage Gate's OS has maintained for decades and its nearly endemic nature of viral infection...pretty much anybody logging onto a bank's servers has a virus on it and all a bank need do is task the police to recover a computer, find a virus and claim the bank is not at fault.
So, the question becomes a chain of evidence and which route is of less resistance.
that rabbit might take your head off i know a lapland tale about a hole where women got dropped off...turned my stomach a little but i don't know, maybe the story will keep
and never repeat if the tale is told of what fools of old kept their King a fold and a narrative hit the street
i'd say you've properly framed the term 'hack' as to usage which is a path of etymology...in my experience, a meaningful appreciation of a term can be found in historical parallel as 'problems' or 'quandries' and their solutions make appearance in seemingly unrelated phenomena
my apprecation of hack came from writers and though hack has negative connotation, no writer begins with accomplished technique...it's 'hacked' which is to say developed by hours and hours of earnest iteration and eventually derivation
some of the best writing to be read might never find an audience, but that writing is no less an accomplishment and a dedication to process
etymology, as a discipline, was greatly abandoned by the 1950s because there are two 'paths' to walk-- phonetic value and semantic value
the supposition of an indo-european root did much to kill the art of etymology...any old dictionary you look at connotes through an * that no actual example of the syllable exists in a written record but is supposed by the comparison of lexicons
the paradigm was that a "single" language might be constructed from which all others were derived, but modern linguistics contends a more complex scenario as does anthropology as to a scenario of a protean hominid
prior to the Second Great War, many countries had earnestly been translating their dictionaries into other languages but such effort was halted by the dogs of war...a failed return to Babel
Not only is only just a piece of paper, i don't recall having signed the damn thing...why don't we just cut through the cheese and start issuing stocks under the name of our Presidents...but you know, don't tell nobody...our civil servants have given so much of their lives to a churlish, unappreciative constituency...and a pay out is in order here...
Apple NEVER STOLE the design of its GUI...APPLE traded stock with XEROX to be taken on a tour of PARC and Gates was too biased by a command line to recognize the innovation of Palo Alto's research
Jobs EXCELS at recognizing the utility of others' work...Gates was too content with a burgeoning success
MOST users were biased by the command line...they LOVED the esoteric knowledge because they'd invested YEARS of their lives to understand its SYNTAX...and there is no more demanding syntax than that of a computer
Sequoia is frightened that the contracts they've secured for the next few years will become worthless if what happened to Diebold happens to them.
They're unconcerned with public relations because their contracts were secured with congressional reps and senators.
The only damage that can be done is if some geeks discover what's been discovered in Diebold machines, making the contracts worthless and making some VC's very, very unhappy.
Sequoia doesn't know which end of the Ace is up and that's why they're sending out ambiguous, legal threats to a university AND any state with which they have a contract-- arrogant rich men playing by old school rules in an industry they don't understand
>Make a roaring bluster about this and then fold like wet paper tigers when it comes time to put up or shut up..
a pretty big assumption there, as many have made blusters and never folded, and you've never heard of them; but, rage on because rage is appropriate, though clouded
i read in your words an unproven faith in your own discernment of those you describe in words as possessed with a courage and the dismissable mad person on the street
This country's hypocrisies are a persistent, petty and subtle agenda of a few, tired dying people. The LoC was never the people's library in practice so much as a promise...folk recordings represented that promise crying out from a stubborn reality that not everbody can afford to make a trip to D.C., stay at a hotel, and view the library's contents.
And the internet was going to change that...and dying, dying dying Micro$oft steps in to handle the bottleneck.
Not for another 50 years now will the promise of the LoC be realized because somebody's daddy is somebody's daddy in America
As our unitary executive waxes Dieboldly democratic, Inking the tips of fingers, scrawling toe-tags; A land rule by a King, Prefers sword over guillotine, and Cauls over faces
Nine eleven Laden and 15/19...0.789 Assuredly a Saudi alliance
Slashdot Mirror
Conquering gods their titles take from foes they captive make.
-White Goddess
What "I" want/would pay for...is anecdotal. The chasm between Broadcast and Distributed prevails. "You" don't watch such'n'such but advertisers have bet dollars others do. Circling the dial is indicative and instructive of what humanity you share inclusive of age, taste and intelligence. The math used to measure and maximize the behavior of a demographic is a battle of trade secret equal to military campaign.
No...but proprietary efforts have a tendency to exaggerate success and undermine what is meant by applying a "gold standard" to education.
teaches more. Doom + Myst isn't a magical formula for learning unless the plan is to populate Second Life. But an open source, immersive environment is exciting if, say, Powers of 10 is the bar. Doesn't virtual reality promise means of illustration limited only by imagination? Game environments seek to temper all the running around (that is so fun) with puzzles that are, in a way, signatures of what abstract thinking skills its players possess.
uhmm..."For all intensive purposes"???
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_the_saying_'all_intents_and_purposes'_or_'all_intense_purposes'
Morality is a code determined by the interpretation of a text. Ethics are a code of behavior to which a group agrees and continues to evolve. Ethics is a present consensus. I agree with the post in regard to how the term is tossed around, but would warn against the semantic of "concepts of right and wrong." That people have differing values and opinions is what drives the study and application of ethics, not what limits it.
"It's illegal to secretly record people, especially in their own homes (reasonable expectation of privacy)."
This falls apart with leasor/ee agreements and what fraction of a population owns the property of another.
"No laws on the books," is what i've heard repeated through the years-- citing technology as the specific without enforcement
My point is the poster claims to myth bust and his very terms are machoistic metaphor. Your own diction, such as bitchy, pretends to communicate beyond insinuation in a tone of superiority. My point is beer swelling, caffeinated tech-heads loooove to believe the contentions of gender are a two-way street...when on this very day, King Spam commited the kind of murderous control typical of a man's psyche, but is far less common of women. And by the way, maxume, blather is an aural adjective and fountain usually implies the written word. That's a mixed metaphor-- hack.
A root cause you'll never hear about IF "you" are a conceived audience of feminist troglydites...and voila...women are once again "really" what is? keeping culture stagnant...as far as VICIOUS...really? as in what a woman will SAY? versus the propensity for a testerone heavy humanoid to execute gunpowder, fire, blunt and sharp instrument and muscular advantage? Insight into human behavior IS gender savvy, but illustrating the subtlety of verbal power struggles with a metaphor of CUDGEL???...this argument is as idiotic as the Harvard guy that started this nonsense for which he should have been decapitated Saudi style...to exagerrate MY point
The Russians have an appreciation for an "idiot". If you have facts to describe, describe them. Insulting the author of the post to which you're responding is one way to "fuel" your fire, but it's not going to make your argument any more lucid, useful or correct.
Your analysis proffers the "widget" as your economic/transactional model but taxes are applied to products and services of which people depend: food, water & power, heating oil, clothing, gasoline, and on and on.
Sadly, proffering the widget as your central model is how children are first introduced to economic models in programs such as Junior Achievement or an introductory Economics class on a typical American university campus.
You've confused market models with public policy and are prone to zestful, robust promises of a labor-absent, capitalist propaganda.
10 PRINT "[user's name]";
20 GOTO 10
i hear the term 'trigger' from as educated circles as the Supreme Court
Trigger is a horse
Trigger is a causal construct
Trigger has dubious connotation
Precipitate is a correlation of a field and a force
Forces are expressions of an interruption of a
field's equilibrium
many fields can be contained, many cannot
many forces are introduced, many are arrived by
a stress around a contained field
a "trigger' is either directly linked or "acts" from a balance of links
a trigger is a node and behaves to a prioritized
link or balances input from many
either heirarchically prioritized or given equity
the variable of a trigger is clock timing...
how many times around a value will be "seen" and by what order
What else do i have to say?
Wallace S.
13 Ways of Seeing a Blackbird
So, let us see...suppose an individual had some
indication that they were being harassed by
sharply dressed men in neighborhoods where they
might not usually be...and suppose an individual
had made a FOIA request, but the request had gone
ignored because a US citizen without the consult
of a barraster or esquire or lawyer dude isn't
really a recognized citizen by anyone
Hey, everyone knows you had better lay out some
bucks if you want sweet Justice to wear a blind.
Now, I wonder if the FOIA documents bequeathed by
so audited and transparent an entity that might
exist under the unitary executive's thumb of late
I wonder if the names of those targeted by what is
called "exquisite intelligence" is redacted.
I wonder if, in the beginning, but a few
troublesome individuals were bullied and
threatened by implication and a "the gloves have
come off" mentality felt the need to bureaucratize
its systemic abuse and broaden its number of
transgressions to make an acute elision of the
Constitution's spirit merely a matter of numbers.
To lessen the legal ramifications...turn a
shoot-out into a civil lawsuit, knowing full well
(Senior Justice: "Well, well, well") citizens
can't very well sue its govenment as redresses
of grievance are CLEARLY covered in the Constitu-
tion.
I wonder...is my name among redacted? And what
FOIA's price is to be paid to find out?
atoms so possess such elasticity
"If two people walk towards each other and pass each other in the hall, that would be essentially identical to them walking up to each other and turning around - identity obfuscated."
i'm unsure humans do, but as to the topic of this thread, Mit has clearly been given a blow
I suppose your argument lies in the term "access" as when you sign on to the bank's servers, you have "entered" a bank and to what party a responsibility of security is assigned is the literal argument you so damn with time.
This very question has already been addressed by the Securities and Exchange Commission...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/15/business/15norris.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
with a decision with which, I might infer from this quickly modded post, you profanely contend.
I would pose the question as to the greatest likelihood of fraud that might go undetected. A bank blaming an individual, of which there would be potentially hundreds of thousands to consider or an individual blaming a bank, fewer in number, properly regulated and inspected.
Moreover, given the advantage Gate's OS has maintained for decades and its nearly endemic nature of viral infection...pretty much anybody logging onto a bank's servers has a virus on it and all a bank need do is task the police to recover a computer, find a virus and claim the bank is not at fault.
So, the question becomes a chain of evidence and which route is of less resistance.
that rabbit might take your head off
i know a lapland tale about a hole where women
got dropped off...turned my stomach a little
but i don't know, maybe the story will keep
and never repeat if the tale is told of what
fools of old kept their King a fold and a
narrative hit the street
deeplink down
deep packet clowns
show me your packets
is that a smile or a frown?
thrice cola crown
Godel the bounds
where is Gibran's appendix found?
i'd say you've properly framed the term 'hack' as to usage which is a path of etymology...in my experience, a meaningful appreciation of a term can be found in historical parallel as 'problems' or 'quandries' and their solutions make appearance in seemingly unrelated phenomena
my apprecation of hack came from writers and though hack has negative connotation, no writer begins with accomplished technique...it's 'hacked' which is to say developed by hours and hours of earnest iteration and eventually derivation
some of the best writing to be read might never find an audience, but that writing is no less an accomplishment and a dedication to process
etymology, as a discipline, was greatly abandoned by the 1950s because there are two 'paths' to walk-- phonetic value and semantic value
the supposition of an indo-european root did much to kill the art of etymology...any old dictionary you look at connotes through an * that no actual example of the syllable exists in a written record but is supposed by the comparison of lexicons
the paradigm was that a "single" language might be constructed from which all others were derived, but modern linguistics contends a more complex scenario as does anthropology as to a scenario of a protean hominid
prior to the Second Great War, many countries had earnestly been translating their dictionaries into other languages but such effort was halted by the dogs of war...a failed return to Babel
Not only is only just a piece of paper, i don't recall having signed the damn thing...why don't we just cut through the cheese and start issuing stocks under the name of our Presidents...but you know, don't tell nobody...our civil servants have given so much of their lives to a churlish, unappreciative constituency...and a pay out is in order here...
I am such an old man, at 41...
Apple NEVER STOLE the design of its GUI...APPLE traded stock with XEROX to be taken on a tour of PARC and Gates was too biased by a command line to recognize the innovation of Palo Alto's research
Jobs EXCELS at recognizing the utility of others' work...Gates was too content with a burgeoning success
MOST users were biased by the command line...they LOVED the esoteric knowledge because they'd invested YEARS of their lives to understand its SYNTAX...and there is no more demanding syntax than that of a computer
maybe a grandmother
Sequoia is frightened that the contracts they've secured for the next few years will become worthless if what happened to Diebold happens to them.
They're unconcerned with public relations because their contracts were secured with congressional reps and senators.
The only damage that can be done is if some geeks discover what's been discovered in Diebold machines, making the contracts worthless and making some VC's very, very unhappy.
Sequoia doesn't know which end of the Ace is up and that's why they're sending out ambiguous, legal threats to a university AND any state with which they have a contract-- arrogant rich men playing by old school rules in an industry they don't understand
>Make a roaring bluster about this and then fold like wet paper tigers when it comes time to put up or shut up..
a pretty big assumption there,
as many have made blusters and never folded, and you've never heard of them;
but, rage on because rage is appropriate, though clouded
i read in your words an unproven faith in your own discernment of those you describe in words as possessed with a courage and the dismissable mad person on the street
This country's hypocrisies are a persistent, petty and subtle agenda of a few, tired dying people. The LoC was never the people's library in practice so much as a promise...folk recordings represented that promise crying out from a stubborn reality that not everbody can afford to make a trip to D.C., stay at a hotel, and view the library's contents.
And the internet was going to change that...and dying, dying dying Micro$oft steps in to handle the bottleneck.
Not for another 50 years now will the promise of the LoC be realized because somebody's daddy is somebody's daddy in America
As our unitary executive waxes Dieboldly democratic,
Inking the tips of fingers, scrawling toe-tags;
A land rule by a King,
Prefers sword over guillotine, and
Cauls over faces
Nine eleven Laden and 15/19...0.789
Assuredly a Saudi alliance
But a Rose by any other name?