People are really bad at accurately weighing risks, plus emotional aspects of memory can "unfairly" tilt the balance one way or the other. So you're willing to drive in a car to get to the WTC because you love your job and the City, even though that car trip is much more likely to lead to death than sitting in the building when a plane flies by low. And, on some strange level, the possibility of death in a car has a level of cultural acceptance that death by airplane hasn't.
Sorry. "Reasonably" from the point of view of the less rational parts of our brains that don't ever want to have to experience something terrible that has happened a second time (no matter how unlikely a repeat may be), generating fear and a strong desire to flee. The part that can take over even though the rational part is able to consider the likelihood of another plane crash is very low.
Unfortunately for people who experienced the collapse of the WTC towers first hand, low flying planes crashing into buildings is something that could reasonably happen, and one could argue that it is not sane to wait and see if an unusually low flying plane is actually going to crash into a building before taking steps to save one's life.
I think we need to get away from binary options, let's embrace the touchscreen technology to allow voters to touch closer to or further from the name of a candidate as a function of their degree of support for the candidate. Maybe use better graphics and sound cards in those things to enhance the voting experience as well. I'm only half joking, we just had a 17% turnout for a mayoral election here last week, maybe we should make the voting machines more like gambling machines.
Instead of a low Earth orbit like Hubble, Kepler is going to use an "Earth-trailing heliocentric orbit with a period of 372.5 days.":
http://kepler.nasa.gov/sci/design/orbit.html
that it is not clear that intelligence is the best solution to the question as to how to best propagate life. We've spend generations understanding how bacteria help and harm us, and have created more and more intellectual defenses and offenses to protect us from their harmful effects. Nevertheless, their unintelligent brute force efforts have always bested our best efforts (or we have acted to undermine our own successes). We may think that we are the dominant form of life on this planet, but billions upon billions of microorganisms would beg to differ.
I think the investigators had to choose the game based on the fMRI technique they chose to use.
fMRI studies require multiple trials of similar mental activities from multiple subjects, then an attempt is made to identify a signal emerging from the averaged noise of the multiple subjects and trials.
Since subjects have to be lying still in the MRI machine during the study, the complexity of gameplay is limited. PD was probably chosen partly because of this limitation.
There are a variety of strategies that allow cellular networks to function in these situations, and to ensure that certain phones can almost always use the network.
http://wps.ncs.gov/
At about 3 minutes, the software prevents roll beyond 67 degrees. At about 4:30, an attempt is made to stall the aircraft, at which time the software overrides the throttle settings.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO5l6_d6yck
"Blimey!"
At about 3 minutes, the software prevents roll beyond 67 degrees.
At about 4:30, an attempt is made to stall the aircraft, at which time the software overrides the throttle settings.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO5l6_d6yck
"Blimey!"
Slashdot Mirror
Posting to delete accidental mod "funny" instead of "informative." I've only had one drink, sorry.
People are really bad at accurately weighing risks, plus emotional aspects of memory can "unfairly" tilt the balance one way or the other. So you're willing to drive in a car to get to the WTC because you love your job and the City, even though that car trip is much more likely to lead to death than sitting in the building when a plane flies by low. And, on some strange level, the possibility of death in a car has a level of cultural acceptance that death by airplane hasn't.
Sorry. "Reasonably" from the point of view of the less rational parts of our brains that don't ever want to have to experience something terrible that has happened a second time (no matter how unlikely a repeat may be), generating fear and a strong desire to flee. The part that can take over even though the rational part is able to consider the likelihood of another plane crash is very low.
Unfortunately for people who experienced the collapse of the WTC towers first hand, low flying planes crashing into buildings is something that could reasonably happen, and one could argue that it is not sane to wait and see if an unusually low flying plane is actually going to crash into a building before taking steps to save one's life.
With a little effort. refspoof allows one to view the normally subscriber only articles: http://machinist.salon.com/blog/2008/03/21/wsj/
TFA describes the attempts to create an oral history of the project from the surviving participants, since many are getting old.
I think we need to get away from binary options, let's embrace the touchscreen technology to allow voters to touch closer to or further from the name of a candidate as a function of their degree of support for the candidate. Maybe use better graphics and sound cards in those things to enhance the voting experience as well. I'm only half joking, we just had a 17% turnout for a mayoral election here last week, maybe we should make the voting machines more like gambling machines.
Instead of a low Earth orbit like Hubble, Kepler is going to use an "Earth-trailing heliocentric orbit with a period of 372.5 days.": http://kepler.nasa.gov/sci/design/orbit.html
that it is not clear that intelligence is the best solution to the question as to how to best propagate life. We've spend generations understanding how bacteria help and harm us, and have created more and more intellectual defenses and offenses to protect us from their harmful effects. Nevertheless, their unintelligent brute force efforts have always bested our best efforts (or we have acted to undermine our own successes). We may think that we are the dominant form of life on this planet, but billions upon billions of microorganisms would beg to differ.
I think the investigators had to choose the game based on the fMRI technique they chose to use. fMRI studies require multiple trials of similar mental activities from multiple subjects, then an attempt is made to identify a signal emerging from the averaged noise of the multiple subjects and trials. Since subjects have to be lying still in the MRI machine during the study, the complexity of gameplay is limited. PD was probably chosen partly because of this limitation.
There are a variety of strategies that allow cellular networks to function in these situations, and to ensure that certain phones can almost always use the network. http://wps.ncs.gov/
At about 3 minutes, the software prevents roll beyond 67 degrees. At about 4:30, an attempt is made to stall the aircraft, at which time the software overrides the throttle settings. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO5l6_d6yck "Blimey!"
At about 3 minutes, the software prevents roll beyond 67 degrees. At about 4:30, an attempt is made to stall the aircraft, at which time the software overrides the throttle settings. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO5l6_d6yck "Blimey!"