Slashdot Mirror


User: Mindcontrolled

Mindcontrolled's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,781
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,781

  1. Re:Google bashing thread! on Google Throws /. Under Bus To Snag Patent · · Score: 1

    We should form a self-help group... ;) I mostly stay out of patent related discussions, though.

  2. Re:Welcome to the future on Why America Doesn't Need More Tech Giants Like Apple · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's more or less how it is done now in large-scale pharma research. Any idea for a plausible lead compound? Nah, we don't need no stinking ideas. We have that fancy combinatorial chemistry which let's us build huge-arse substance libraries, mostly automated, which we then throw on cell cultures, mostly automated, too. Get some Chinese post-docs on time-limited contracts to do some data mining on the results, and here we go. We are indeed in the process of automating away research scientist jobs.

  3. Re:not all humor is about 'gaps' on The Science of Humor · · Score: 1

    And no. You are not the first. Your supposed wit does not extend that far.

  4. Re:not all humor is about 'gaps' on The Science of Humor · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    In a supremely ironic manner, the moment every fuckwit without a shred of an argument or a brain started to use it as an ad hominem.

  5. Re:not all humor is about 'gaps' on The Science of Humor · · Score: 1

    No! ;)

  6. Re:not all humor is about 'gaps' on The Science of Humor · · Score: -1, Troll

    Oh look, the local glibertardian posts borderline sociopathic drivel he considers humor. Ah hah, hah. I don't find it offensive, but seriously, you consider that stuff *witty*? Boring in a vaguely annoying way, due to lack of brains, that's all I can see there.

  7. Re:VOTE! "WHO'S WRECKING AMERIKKKA?" on Senator Wants 'Terrorist' Label On Blogs · · Score: 1

    Well, if it is not Fox, where exactly do you get your bullshit from?

  8. Re:Memo to NASA on NASA's Next Mission: Deep Space · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Moon

    2. Helium 3

    3. ????

    4. Working fusion engine

    5. rocket fuel//profit.

  9. Re:Are we going to build it? on NASA's Next Mission: Deep Space · · Score: 1

    Thanks for finally showing your colours. You have proven yourself to be a brainless conservative troll many times. It is not particularly surprising that you finally out yourself as equally brainless antisemite. Who would have thunk...

  10. Re:Let the informed battles begin on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    Oh great. I hang out Watts as bait and you swallow it hook, line and sinker and actually defend the liar? Good grief, more than I bargained for. Please, come back when you are intellectually mature enough to realize that Watts has as much in common with a scientist as your average cockroach.

  11. Are you freaking serious? on Valve's Gabe Newell On Piracy: It's Not a Pricing Problem · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yo Gabe, you dare come up with this bullshit in the same week in which your code monkeys forced a stealth patch onto skyrim's TESV.exe, disabling the large address aware patch? Seriously? I know it is fixed by now - not by your retard outfit, but by the community, but seriously? Give me one reason why I ever again should buy from your huckster business, just one. I used to like steam, but this week you made it abundantly clear that you are nothing but a shitstain.

  12. Re:Seems fair... on In Australia, Immunize Or Lose Benefits · · Score: 1

    That's a bit dated. Calling everything we don't like fascist is so 70s. Kinda out of fashion now. Not that there is any meaningful communist left left nowadays. ;)

  13. Re:Seems fair... on In Australia, Immunize Or Lose Benefits · · Score: 2

    It is common sense. Common sense seriously disturbs the glibertardian mind.

  14. Re:So on In Australia, Immunize Or Lose Benefits · · Score: 1

    The trout in my local river sure seem to have developed some hook resistance... Little bastards outsmart me every time...

  15. Re:It's not the temperature, stupid. on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    While I agree, I think you just will spawn a whole new bunch of lying, denying fuckwits with that. We are past the stage where linking to facts has any merit...

  16. Re:Here's The Thing. on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    Seriously, that gets +5 informative instead of -5 retarded? The sheer amount of factual errors in this post is staggering. The cluelessness, it burns. It is hard to find a single sentence that does not contain some amount of weapons grade fail.

  17. Re:In other news... on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    I take it a "Warmist" lives in the same biotope like a "gravitationist" or a "evolutionist", yes? or do they even share their intellectual biome with "realists"?

  18. Re:well if this pans out on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    tax everyone for breathing air.

    Oh look, a strawman! And what a nice one! Protip: If you want to be taken seriously as "Skeptic" - instead of being viewed as retarded lying fuck - stick to the facts.

  19. Re:Let the informed battles begin on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    You may want to stop besmirching the name of skepticism. Skepticism, after all, is fact based. If it is not, we call it denial. Or outright lying.

  20. Re:Let the informed battles begin on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    You can take your hand off your dick now and return to reality.

  21. Re:Let the informed battles begin on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 2

    Sure, rather cite Watts. I mean, one has citations to publications in serious journals, and one is made up bullshit by a weatherman. God, the bias.

  22. Re:saved! on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    Exploration and finds have peaked AGES ago. And yes, the price will rise, making the use of oil economically unfeasible. What was your point again?

  23. Re:saved! on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 1

    And what's the EROEI of those 140 years worth of oil? What is the possible extraction rate? Ahh, yes... here we go..

  24. Re:saved! on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 2

    While I agree that TOD has all the information one needs, I'd rather not have the retards sent there. There is actually civilized discussion possible at TOD these days. I'd rather keep it that way.

  25. Re:saved! on Climate May Be Less Sensitive To CO2 Than Previously Thought · · Score: 2

    Do you seriously believe that easily available oil is there to be drilled when people are hailing -20000 feet deepwater fields and arctic fields that are a bitch to exploit as the next big thing? Where are those "vast tracks of land, full of oil"? Please, cite one major play that is not exploited yet.