Wow! did you learn that in school or just picked it out of thin air? If the former, we really pity your ignorance and the school system you've been through, if the latter, you should read more and from better sources...
"This comes after the arrival of a new chief executive and it is after the successful introduction of new products, so it is about right-sizing the company," said analyst Cody Acree with Williams Financial Group in Austin.
"You don't cut until you have done all the work you need to get new products out," he said. "But once you have them out and have identified what you need to do to keep moving forward, then you have more of a reason to go ahead and take job actions. You don't want to make the cuts before the CEO gets in, and you don't want to make the cuts before you get the products out. Now that those two are passed, it is time to get the cost structure in line with the rest of the fabless semiconductor industry"
This a**hole talks about the layoffs as one would discuss tree pruning. I guess that the whole "anal-yst" trade group is full of psychopaths, devoid of any humanity.
Well, you can make a brick "fly" if you attach it to a turbine powerful enough. I'm pretty sure your friend is flying jets, but that's a different game (and I don't know much about jets except that it's a very expensive hobby, one crash sets you back many thousands of dollars).
I still stand by my earlier statement that the model pictured in the article cannot lift any meaningful payload. That's why I think that the whole thing is fishy.
You're wrong in that regard. The max. usable wing loading is much larger for a real-size plane than for a small model, even if in all other regards the scaling is perfect.
That thing is a freaking "scale" model; at scale 1/10, an upper wing loading is like 15-16oz/sqft (making the model fly like a brick anyway). Since its wing area is about 3sqft, this means that the AUW cannot exceed 3lbs, including the frame, power plant, RX, servos and, in this fellow's case, a detonator and C4. That doesn't leave much room for C4.
If you want to carry stuff using a RC model airplane, you should choose an airframe designed for that (large wing area, maybe an undercamber profile etc), not a shitty 1/10 foamy.
As for your question, the answer is yes, I am flying models exactly in that scale range (1/12 to 1/8).
You're the idiot! The article mentions a 1/10 scale plane (in the picture it looks like an e-flite F86-Sabre model). You have any idea how much it could haul up? A couple of ounces of C4 at most.
You're using the wrong tool. You should sleep train your baby instead; after this you will have much more time to do whatever you want without her slumped on your shoulder. And b.t.w., to achieve that you only need accommodating neighbors and a couple of pairs of mufflers...
It's interesting that 75ky is not enough time for a species to diverge into incompatible branches; successful mating between individuals from these branches creates perfectly normal offspring.
I wonder what would have happened if the above was not true; probably even worse extermination, just like the bushmeat thing in Africa.
For someone who has such a low UID (heck, it's the first time I see someone with a two-digit UID), you seem incredibly out of touch with reality (or maybe just because of it).
That woman did nothing useful for any of the companies she "worked" for; she just was lucky to not screw up too much. However, her luck allowed her to grow arrogant and to mistakenly believe she's competent. Sadly, it looks like she was able to mislead others in believing the same, (some) voters and BoDs alike.
As the original topic was hearing aids, which are not covered by most "health insurers" in the US, your rant is pointless. Yes, one has to pay out of pocket to get these and a couple of grands for them is an outrageous amount of money for such simple gadgets.
Although there seem to be many CIP among these 20+, some of the patents bearing his name seem non-obvious. This is quite typical for someone really productive filing patent applications assigned to his employer (in that case, Microsoft). Maybe 10-20%?
I have 16 US patents in the field of circuit design, of which I'm really proud of exactly 2, as they are really good, non-obvious, breakthrough-type inventions. All others are meant to increase my employer's patent chest for either defensive or attack purposes.
What's up with this cliché reply being given everytime someone points out that China's products are almost always low-quality?
For anyone who knows both countries' culture, it's crystal-clear that China cannot pull off a "Japan". It's not a matter of knowledge, it's all about how the people regard and what they invest in their work. If you really think that China workers of today can be compared to the Japan ones from the sixties and seventies, you're sadly mistaken.
You really don't get it, man! When they compare the radiation emitted by these scanners, they compare the energy put out by the machine's XRay source.
However, what matters here is the radiation dose, which is defined by the radiation energy divided by the mass of matter receiving it (J/kg). The dental XRay exposes the whole cheek and gum volume between the gun and the film. The dose is low.
OTOH, for the backscatter XRay to work, the radiation must be reflected by the skin, this means that the mass of human tissue that receives it is very small (just a few layers below the dead skin cells, get it?). This means a high radiation dose, which is a bad thing for your living skin.
Anyway, it must be such an awesome feeling to be sarcastic from a position of ignorance. Keep doing it, you'll see how far it gets you.
Sorry, but the one with shitty understanding of science is *you*. Backscatter x-ray is completely different from a dental x-ray or the cosmic radiation in the effects on the body tissue. The dose is much lower, but the tissue volume it irradiates is minuscule; the problem is that it penetrates beyond the layer of dead skin cells, significantly increasing the risk of carcinoma. Guess who's the most at risk? Children.
Wow! Who's the idiot who came up with the Reliant idea? Two wheels in front and one in the back would work (except for reverse driving, but there the speed is limited), but this? Are there assholes who really drive such an oversized tricycle on public streets?
Considering the fact that California, despite the dire situation, still subsidizes some of the chest-thumping, mouth-foaming but revenue-devoid "red" states, I'd say that secession would improve this state's outlook.
Slashdot Mirror
Thank you, this is really (+1 Insightful).
Cheers!
I agree that the GP was an ass. Totally offtopic, but related to your sig, why was Booth a patriot?
yeah, yeah, blame it on Mr. Lincoln for wasting this unique chance to keep SC out of the Union...
Wow! did you learn that in school or just picked it out of thin air? If the former, we really pity your ignorance and the school system you've been through, if the latter, you should read more and from better sources...
This Charity's effort impact is beyond huge.
"This comes after the arrival of a new chief executive and it is after the successful introduction of new products, so it is about right-sizing the company," said analyst Cody Acree with Williams Financial Group in Austin.
"You don't cut until you have done all the work you need to get new products out," he said. "But once you have them out and have identified what you need to do to keep moving forward, then you have more of a reason to go ahead and take job actions. You don't want to make the cuts before the CEO gets in, and you don't want to make the cuts before you get the products out. Now that those two are passed, it is time to get the cost structure in line with the rest of the fabless semiconductor industry"
This a**hole talks about the layoffs as one would discuss tree pruning. I guess that the whole "anal-yst" trade group is full of psychopaths, devoid of any humanity.
The thingie he was using to control the meat grinder is a vanilla 2.4GHz TX, not a game console.
Well, you can make a brick "fly" if you attach it to a turbine powerful enough. I'm pretty sure your friend is flying jets, but that's a different game (and I don't know much about jets except that it's a very expensive hobby, one crash sets you back many thousands of dollars).
I still stand by my earlier statement that the model pictured in the article cannot lift any meaningful payload. That's why I think that the whole thing is fishy.
You're wrong in that regard. The max. usable wing loading is much larger for a real-size plane than for a small model, even if in all other regards the scaling is perfect.
That thing is a freaking "scale" model; at scale 1/10, an upper wing loading is like 15-16oz/sqft (making the model fly like a brick anyway). Since its wing area is about 3sqft, this means that the AUW cannot exceed 3lbs, including the frame, power plant, RX, servos and, in this fellow's case, a detonator and C4. That doesn't leave much room for C4.
If you want to carry stuff using a RC model airplane, you should choose an airframe designed for that (large wing area, maybe an undercamber profile etc), not a shitty 1/10 foamy.
As for your question, the answer is yes, I am flying models exactly in that scale range (1/12 to 1/8).
You're the idiot! The article mentions a 1/10 scale plane (in the picture it looks like an e-flite F86-Sabre model). You have any idea how much it could haul up? A couple of ounces of C4 at most.
Either that guy is stupid or the case is bogus.
You're using the wrong tool. You should sleep train your baby instead; after this you will have much more time to do whatever you want without her slumped on your shoulder. And b.t.w., to achieve that you only need accommodating neighbors and a couple of pairs of mufflers...
It's interesting that 75ky is not enough time for a species to diverge into incompatible branches; successful mating between individuals from these branches creates perfectly normal offspring.
I wonder what would have happened if the above was not true; probably even worse extermination, just like the bushmeat thing in Africa.
For someone who has such a low UID (heck, it's the first time I see someone with a two-digit UID), you seem incredibly out of touch with reality (or maybe just because of it).
That woman did nothing useful for any of the companies she "worked" for; she just was lucky to not screw up too much. However, her luck allowed her to grow arrogant and to mistakenly believe she's competent. Sadly, it looks like she was able to mislead others in believing the same, (some) voters and BoDs alike.
As the original topic was hearing aids, which are not covered by most "health insurers" in the US, your rant is pointless. Yes, one has to pay out of pocket to get these and a couple of grands for them is an outrageous amount of money for such simple gadgets.
Although there seem to be many CIP among these 20+, some of the patents bearing his name seem non-obvious. This is quite typical for someone really productive filing patent applications assigned to his employer (in that case, Microsoft). Maybe 10-20%?
I have 16 US patents in the field of circuit design, of which I'm really proud of exactly 2, as they are really good, non-obvious, breakthrough-type inventions. All others are meant to increase my employer's patent chest for either defensive or attack purposes.
It means that it creates jobs for the lawyers to litigate patent claims. It could mean nothing else.
That's why it's also known as "The Lawyer Employment Act"
What's up with this cliché reply being given everytime someone points out that China's products are almost always low-quality?
For anyone who knows both countries' culture, it's crystal-clear that China cannot pull off a "Japan". It's not a matter of knowledge, it's all about how the people regard and what they invest in their work. If you really think that China workers of today can be compared to the Japan ones from the sixties and seventies, you're sadly mistaken.
app works in firefox just fine. I'm not sure you have to register to start transcribing.
You really don't get it, man! When they compare the radiation emitted by these scanners, they compare the energy put out by the machine's XRay source.
However, what matters here is the radiation dose, which is defined by the radiation energy divided by the mass of matter receiving it (J/kg). The dental XRay exposes the whole cheek and gum volume between the gun and the film. The dose is low.
OTOH, for the backscatter XRay to work, the radiation must be reflected by the skin, this means that the mass of human tissue that receives it is very small (just a few layers below the dead skin cells, get it?). This means a high radiation dose, which is a bad thing for your living skin.
Anyway, it must be such an awesome feeling to be sarcastic from a position of ignorance. Keep doing it, you'll see how far it gets you.
Sorry, but the one with shitty understanding of science is *you*. Backscatter x-ray is completely different from a dental x-ray or the cosmic radiation in the effects on the body tissue. The dose is much lower, but the tissue volume it irradiates is minuscule; the problem is that it penetrates beyond the layer of dead skin cells, significantly increasing the risk of carcinoma. Guess who's the most at risk? Children.
I guess you don't travel much. Once you're in the security line, you cannot leave without some form of screening; if you try to, they will detain you.
Wow! Who's the idiot who came up with the Reliant idea? Two wheels in front and one in the back would work (except for reverse driving, but there the speed is limited), but this? Are there assholes who really drive such an oversized tricycle on public streets?
Considering the fact that California, despite the dire situation, still subsidizes some of the chest-thumping, mouth-foaming but revenue-devoid "red" states, I'd say that secession would improve this state's outlook.
oooh! [what one says in this situation? yes!] It's very good, yeah, the talent is there but you just need a little practice, that's all! :P