Slashdot Mirror


Teacher Suspended For Reading Ender's Game To Students

An anonymous reader writes "Forbes reports that a middle school teacher in South Carolina has been placed on administrative leave for reading sci-fi classic Ender's Game to his students. According to blogger Tod Kelly, '[A parent] reported him to the school district complained that the book was pornographic; that same parent also asked the local police to file criminal charges against the teacher. As of today, the police have not yet decided whether or not to file charges (which is probably a good sign that they won't). The school district, however, appears to agree with the parent, is considering firing the teacher and will be eliminating the book from the school.'"

1,054 comments

  1. "I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well there was that scene where Ender shows up at Petra's dorm wearing a sleeveless jean jacket with a utility belt and says that he heard the cable was broken ... or wait, am I confusing Ender's Game with Logjammin'? I mean, clearly, they're basically the same thing.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He fixes the cable?

    2. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by DrGamez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are ok with literal genocide committed by a child soldier, but the moment the kid has to take a shower (and fight a bully), NOW it's pornographic?

      I don't want to live on this pl- no. I don't want THESE people to live on my planet anymore.

    3. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      cable is another sleazy metaphor.

    4. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be fatuous Jeffery.

    5. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by chispito · · Score: 4, Funny

      They are ok with literal xenocide committed by a child soldier, but the moment the kid has to take a shower (and fight a bully), NOW it's pornographic? I don't want to live on this pl- no. I don't want THESE people to live on my planet anymore.

      FTFY for all nerdkind.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    6. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was read to the class. Doesn't it mean it was pornophonic? Which has to be less severe. I mean... if it were the same in terms of arousal effectiveness, I imagine radio porn would be rampant.

    7. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by hawguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      He fixes the cable?

      He must be a Sysadmin!

      Thank you, I was afraid there wouldn't be an opening for the obligatory XKCD reference.

    8. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm hello Big Lebowski!

    9. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, apparently they ARE okay with the whole genocide thing ;)

    10. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      No in Logjammin he never fixes it; you're thinking of the movie Loginsysadmin.

    11. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by honestmonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Bomb those nasty aliens. Fly right up there and bomb them. Oh, yes, those nasty, nasty aliens, bomb them hard. More, more! You know how to do it!" Well, that's from memory, so maybe it's not 100% correct. Pretty sure that's from Ender's Game...

      --
      Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
    12. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      So Orson Scott Card's alternate pen name is Jackie Treehorn? Good thing he didn't illustrate Ender's Game...

    13. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by tibit · · Score: 1

      You've made my day ifyouwereasculptor, thanks! :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    14. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by KhabaLox · · Score: 2

      Well, 1-900 numbers were pretty big before the internet came along and undercut them on price.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    15. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Thavilden · · Score: 1

      Don't forget there was the Jewish kid playing meatspin on his iPad in the barracks.

    16. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These are the same people who bombard the FCC the moment Janet Jackson flashes a boob but have no problem with hours of people being shot to death on TV.

    17. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are ok with literal genocide committed by a child soldier, but the moment the kid has to take a shower (and fight a bully), NOW it's pornographic?

      Having gone to a high school where no less than ten of the students I saw everyday became mommies long before graduation, but no attempts at xeno/genocide, it doesn't really come as a big surprise to me.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    18. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      ... which explains why he's actually won literary prizes for his work, right?

      You don't have to like his writing, but he's a renowned author with real skills.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    19. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think if someone considers a non-sexual literary depiction of a naked child in the shower to be pornographic, it says more about that person than the person who read it to the class.

      On the other hand, I question reading bubblegum fiction like Ender's game in a school setting, especially given the author's tendency towards proselytizing.

    20. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by schlachter · · Score: 1

      if anyone has to be fired...it should be the parent.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    21. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only watch porn for the soundtrack.

    22. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, Donny!

    23. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by toriver · · Score: 2

      No, Xenocide was a later book in the series.

      Wait, now I get it...

    24. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by toriver · · Score: 0

      I guess if Mitt Romney wins the White House lottery he'll make fellow Mormon OSC's books required reading... :)

    25. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They are ok with literal genocide committed by a child soldier, but the moment the kid has to take a shower (and fight a bully), NOW it's pornographic?

      Only if the teacher masturbates while the genocide is being commited.

    26. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Genda · · Score: 1

      Only if you're pulling it...

    27. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Welcome to S. Carolina. We admire men with guns yelling "Yee Haw" who shoot up the criminals, hostges, and bystanders in the name of JVSTICE, but pornography??? By god.. HANG 'EM HIGH!!! Yee Haw!! Give that kid a gun right there, he's my next deputy...

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    28. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Sique · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has probably to do with the fact, that fully blown genocide actually requires skill, while getting pregnant (yourself or getting someone else pregnant) mainly requires the absence of skills - skills one can be taught by actually being educated about sexuality.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    29. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be the first author to be viewed as grossly overrated by "book geeks" as opposed to academics.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    30. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't have to like his writing, but he's a renowned author with real skills.

      Your first two statements are true. The last is provably false if you're referring to writing skill. He may have skill in water polo or stacking blocks of wood into tall towers, but he can't write for shit.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    31. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by ArcherB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, 1-900 numbers were pretty big before the internet came along and undercut them on price.

      And as long as you keep it text, even Dr. Girlfriend can be an operator.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    32. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the US. But sometimes is the hardest thing to do...

    33. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't have kids so I don't really know what's going through these people's heads. I've always suspected that everybody hopes that if nobody brings it up, it'll never occur to the teenagers to get up to mischief. It becomes a perpetual "no it cannot be a problem right now, maybe next year" sort of thing. So if something like sex-ed comes along, it causes the issue to come up at an inopportune time (note: There is no opportune time...) , so they get frustrated that this particular problem is coming up right now. The result? People don't want their kids exposed to things that'll make them think about sex. I'd like to think I'm right, but the thing that baffles me the most about this is all these parents, for some reason, don't remember what being a teenager was like. Remember Back to the Future? Remember Marty's Mom? "I never did things like call boys or park in a car with a boy" and all that other stuff? That's the image I get in my head when I think about these people.

      Maybe I'm right, maybe I'm wrong, I don't know. Whatever their motivations, I agree that trying to keep their kids as pure as the Flanders family is not a useful solution. I just don't see why they'd even have violence on their radar until they start seeing their kids actually hurting each other. Until then, there actually is some sense in being offended by pornographic imagery and turning a blind eye to violence on TV. It's a non-argument, sorry.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    34. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by yurtinus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Come on now, surely you know exactly what's going on from your days in school...

      Student doesn't like the teacher for one reason or another, starts looking for the slightest provocations to harm the teacher. Student finds a reason, rants and raves and cries to mom about it, mom rushes to defend her precious snowflake. School administration fearing lawsuits and the PR backlash sides with the parent and fires teacher. Student pockets this victory and starts looking for the next. Keep an eye on this student, they are going to be big in politics or business some day...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    35. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by geekoid · · Score: 0

      He is also known for crappy endings, and Ender's Game is not an exception to that.

      Weak, sauce.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      No in Logjammin he never fixes it; you're thinking of the movie Loginsysadmin.

      He does fix it, "he ist ein expert, ja". He bangs the set, then the chicks. Jobs a good'un.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    37. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Fallingcow · · Score: 2

      I thought the novella version of Ender's Game was pretty good juvenile fiction. Wouldn't stand up to good adult fiction, but it was OK for what it was. The prose was serviceable, but nothing special--good enough for juvie fic.

      I haven't read any of the rest of his work, but I'd guess a full-sized novel telling the same story would be far less tight and focused and would, consequently, kind of suck.

    38. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Serpents · · Score: 0

      commenting to counter a mod mistake :/

    39. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You haven't read Ender's Game I see. The final scene is a graphic gang-bang with a near-endless line of drones lining up, penetrating, ejaculating, then dying suddenly as the next moves in to penetrate.

    40. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a stupid argument. There is no sex in the scene mentioned. What's more, I'm sure EVERY kid in the class has has the experience of taking a shower or bath at some point, and I highly doubt they were clothed when they did!

    41. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought Xenocide was when you killed a virtual Linux server.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    42. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by reezle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Glad I'm not the only one who wondered why OSC is so revered. I loved the Ender short story, and read quite a few of this guy's novels thinking they would be just as thought provoking, but each book I read made me like him less and less.

    43. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you're not a Big Lebowski fan.

    44. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I prefer hours of people being blown up.

    45. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess you don't like his writing style. I don't know that it's very prosaic but he does tell a great story. I remeber so many great authors I had to read in English lit. They had great style. Really wonderful writers. They couldn't tell a story for shit though. Theodore Dreiser? Really. What shit. Sylish shit is still shit. I think I read more polished turds in High School than I knew existed.

    46. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I thought the novella version of Ender's Game was pretty good juvenile fiction.

      You said it. I would have left out the word "good", though.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    47. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet his name is Peter

    48. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them know of your displeasure!
      Super Intendent: Elizabeth Everitt, Ph.D
      Aiken County School District
      803.641.2428

    49. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hurm... that would be a really underhanded way to get around the whole "abstinence-only education" thing. Assign a book (age-appropriate) that has safe sex as a major talking point (like a parent having "the talk" with their teenager) for a book report.

      Bonus points, if any of the kids ask "why didn't we learn about this in sex ed", tell them that by law you cannot say anything and to talk to their parents.

      P.S., one of my health teachers locked the door and basically violated the law by giving us proper safe sex education. I used to think he was kinda flaky, but he never lost my respect after that. I was one of the few students who understood the risk he was taking.

    50. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by antdude · · Score: 1

      How about we get off this crazy planet? :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    51. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess you don't like his writing style.

      No, his style is not the problem.

      I think I read more polished turds in High School than I knew existed.

      Yes, I think I read Ender's Game in high school. But I also read The Tempest, The Forever War, Ringworld, Pale Fire, Crime and Punishment and Gravity's Rainbow, so I was ultimately able to tell the difference between gold and shit. I also learned that "teen fiction" like Ender's Game is insulting to teens. It is possible to write for an adolescent audience without telling you what to think, like Card often does. And most "teen fiction" or "young adult fiction" is really most appropriate for 10 and 11 year olds who have to be convinced to read a book. By the time a kid is 13, they no longer need to be pandered to.

      Orson Scott Card is one of the most overrated writers ever to write juvenile fiction. He and Ayn Rand are #1 and #2 on that list, but I admit to not being able to decide on the order.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    52. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      You just tell yourself it's Dr. Girlfriend at the other keyboard.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    53. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      South Carolina - The state that fired the first shot in the civil war. Makes me smile every time.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    54. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "They are ok with literal xenocide...."

      Some killed Princess Xena? Noooooo.....

      Oh. Just saw the 'o'.

    55. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by mjwx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Come on now, surely you know exactly what's going on from your days in school...

      Student doesn't like the teacher for one reason or another, starts looking for the slightest provocations to harm the teacher. Student finds a reason, rants and raves and cries to mom about it, mom rushes to defend her precious snowflake. School administration fearing lawsuits and the PR backlash sides with the parent and fires teacher. Student pockets this victory and starts looking for the next. Keep an eye on this student, they are going to be big in politics or business some day...

      The student is not to blame, even if they were looking for a way to strike out at a teacher. The blame here lies in the parent(s) who made the complaints. The parent should have made sure the complaint was legitimate.

      This is the problem with parents today. The school system and teachers are trying their best to educate children but they run head first into "golden uterus" syndrome which has infected parents meaning that their child is the most precious thing in the universe and must be protected from anything slightly remotely harmful. This hasn't been helped by society putting kids on a pedestal (ye olde think of the children).

      The problem is, as you pointed out that Mum, drives her Mum-Tank into the principals office and demands to know why her child has been punished or is learning something she considers unsavoury. Unfortunately school policy is to appease the parents rather then to defend their position. This is mainly due to the fact that if the parent's dont get their way they'll go on TV with a "shocking report" revealing how schools are damaging our kids.

      In Australia it's gotten to the point where the worst thing that can be written on a report card is "Little Johnny needs to pay more attention in class" as threats from parents with no clue and no inclination to punish their little ratbags have become so great. Teachers and principals now live in fear.

      I think parent's need to be reined in, it's their responsibility to punish their children when they do something wrong but unfortunately, they punish anyone else who tries to rein in their inconsiderate, illiterate, little crotchspawn. Maybe if we made parents responsible for what their crotchspawns do, but that wont happen until there is a fundamental shift in the way society thinks (society thinks, isn't that an oxymoron).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    56. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, everyone but the child (who doesn't know any better) and the teacher (who was doing their job) is at fault. The parent for failing to do actual parenting. The school for knuckling. Etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    57. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think card is pretty seriously overrated, as an author not so fantastic, but as a writer he's pretty great, if you take my meaning. I care about his characters in spite of his failings. Clearly he has a lot more value than Ayn Rand :p

      Also, you need to remember that you were above average at least in reading level...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    58. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only a few of these kind of people just disappeared. The rest would get the hint and a lot of bullshit would stop.
      I am willing to bet no more than a hundred will do it.

    59. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by mpe · · Score: 1

      These are the same people who bombard the FCC the moment Janet Jackson flashes a boob but have no problem with hours of people being shot to death on TV.

      Or a sport so dangerous the players need to wear what amounts to body armour with serious injuries not being exactly uncommon even then...

    60. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by ancienthart · · Score: 1

      The result? People don't want their kids exposed to things that'll make them think about sex.

      Which, is basically impossible. The scary thing as a teacher, is that when the kids grafitti their workbooks, it's always the BOYS drawing penises! :-S

    61. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by rich_hudds · · Score: 1

      Whilst I agree that a book can have a nice style and still be boring, Ender's Game is truly awful.

      Liking a really badly written book like Ender's Game is akin to thinking that Transformers II is a good film, and I haven't seen Transformers II to even justify that statement.

      I can't draw and no matter how exciting or interesting a subject I pick, any painting I produce will be shite. Orson Scott Card cannot write, consequently his books (I've only read Ender's Game) are shite.

    62. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That problem can only be solved by teaching contraception like in the rest of the developed world. To teach abstinence as the only solution is immoral. There really is no way of hiding the knowledge of sex to teenagers. If you think otherwise you are not understanding basic human behavior.

      That problem simply does not exist here in Sweden or most of Europe. Due to just a couple of hours of education. In this and some related cases it is hard to understand the US.

    63. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by olau · · Score: 0

      You would be wrong. Sorry. It's a really good book.

    64. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I think card is pretty seriously overrated, as an author not so fantastic, but as a writer he's pretty great, if you take my meaning. I care about his characters in spite of his failings. Clearly he has a lot more value than Ayn Rand :p

      Yeah, you're right. Putting him in with Ayn Rand wasn't fair. Though you probably cared for his characters more because you are an empathic person and have a decent sense of morals. Part of what I don't like about Card is how manipulative he is. I mean, if I see a movie where a dog dies I'm going to get choked up but it doesn't mean the director was talented, only manipulative and going for the cheap reaction. Hell, I get choked up when I see a cartoon where a dog dies.

      But you're definitely right. comparing Card to Rand was going too far.

      Thank you for reigning me in again, drinky.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    65. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      I think all of them can be at fault if certain criteria are met.

      The teacher could be at fault depends on how the teacher "read" the book to his/her students. In this case, it is unclear how the teacher presents the content to his/her students (not mention in the article). A non-offensive book can be offensive if the person who delivers (reads) it wants to.

      The child could be at fault if he/she intends to cause this mess. Is it right to mislead the truth? Children learn fast and they will keep doing it if they can without being taught and getting caught.

      The school is at fault in this case because the school does not want to deal with the problem. The easiest way for them is to fire the teacher and hope that the problem will go away. Actually, this will teach other kids that they have a way to get rid of teachers they don't like.

      The parents are at fault because of their judgement impair. I understand that parents most likely take their children side without any doubt and it is not easy to prove the truth out of whatever their child told them, but the action from these parents is overboard. I have seen this (and still do) everyday. It is natural that many parents are blind to reasons and won't listen to others when their kids complaint about others to them. Even though it is natural, it is not always right.

    66. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Nobody expects the oblig-- I'll come in again.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    67. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I have not read any of the materials here, is there really nudity for them to signal pornographic content, or am missing something?

    68. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Consider the venue: South Carolina. *facepalm*

    69. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you don't like his writing style

      No, it's the pedantic insertion of religious lectures that got boring. Card was a great sci-fi writer who at some point decided that proselytizing was more important than reaching readers, and decided to pimp his ugly religion in his fiction. I used to buy every Card novel that came out. Now he's pretty much dead to me. I just can't stand his tone.

    70. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      The student is not to blame, even if they were looking for a way to strike out at a teacher. The blame here lies in the parent(s) who made the complaints. The parent should have made sure the complaint was legitimate.

      While I agree the blame lies with the parents, it's for a different reason: some parents seek to squelch any viewpoint that does not agree with theirs; "it's pornographic" is just once of many convenient hooks to hang their argument against something they don't like. As a result, books, videos, and ideas get squashed and all the other students lose a learning opportunity. Sometimes I feel like complaining about the most innocuous things so as to have a reason to argue "you didn't ban A so how can you ban B" later on; except the sad reality is most administrators will always take the easy way out

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    71. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      It appears that the Ed Code in South Carolina specifically states that reading in class is equivallent to Pronography. Reading to children would be the same as "Child Pronography." What this educator doesn't fully understand is that Pronography is bad, really, really, bad.

    72. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was read to the class. Doesn't it mean it was pornophonic?

      I believe the term would be pornosonic.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    73. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The child is in middle school. The "doesn't know any better" defense doesn't hold. Maybe he doesn't quite realize the full consequences of his action, but he was still trying to maliciously harm the teacher.

    74. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by fangmcgee · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I read the book years ago but pornographic is the _last_ thing I remember it being.

    75. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by tzot · · Score: 1

      I dare not even consider how sleazy a metaphor Monster Cables would be, then.

      --
      I speak England very best
    76. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I really don't recall any religion in Ender's Game. At least not any organized religion.

    77. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of my health teachers locked the door and basically violated the law by giving us proper safe sex education.

      Holy crap. This sounds like you were molested. Have you talked to a therapist? Is the teacher the authority figure who told you that his is the proper way to teach sex ed?

    78. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The passage in question was "Also, Turno [the police investigator] says that the initial incident report, based on the mother's complaint, did specify that the teacher read passages about ejaculating on a prostitute's face, and it's up to the investigators to determine whether she or her child was exaggerating about that."

      Also, note that the overreaction is because of conservatives. Even if proven that the child made up the story for a laugh, the teacher was still suspended and almost fired, with charges pending (not filed yet, open case). What, why? Well for one, no union protections to go back to the parent and make them prove some malfeasance. Note that the complaint was not made by any child, nor has any child stated what the parent asserted. For all we know, the parent didn't like the teacher and tried to get him fired, and almost succeeded.

      And the reason our education system is poor is because unions try to protect teachers from unfounded lies designed to harm them. If only we outlawed all unions, this would never have happened.

    79. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the other side (i've raised 6 kids, well actually the youngest is only 9 and the oldest is 40+) the situation is much more complex. an anecdote:
      My older kids were served wine with dinner. No, not wine straight up, but a few drops of wine mixed with water from an early age. The eldest has been a screaming fuck-up most of his life, the middle one now almost never drinks and the younger drinks very occasionally.

      The second wave had nothing when they were young and they drink more, sometimes to excess, and still have it mostly under control, but they can worry me (except the nine year old ).

      The difference was that when I was younger I drank more and wanted my kids to drink with caution and thoughtfulness. I wanted them to know how to drink "responsibly", as they used to say. When I was older I had quit drinking (it interfered with my meditation) and couldn't give a good example to the kids.

      Recently I saw a thing in the paper where some kids had a big ass crazy drunkfest of a party, the cops are called and show up to clean up the insanely drunken mess of teenagers and the parents are called in who explain that they authorized the party. They let their kids drink at home and they felt it was better to have them drinking at home than crashing the car and killing innocents and others.

      So, I am in a quandary. The parents of the drunk-ass kids seem to be saying the same thing that I had said in the past. But the results were quite different. Those parents didn't think, didn't consider that the reason (for me anyway) isn't just to keep the kids safe by letting them drink at home, but instead to teach them something extra about how to behave as an adult with alcohol. And to give them an example of how to do it.

      Somehow,for me anyway, there is a sad connection here between the drinking cult in the US now and the cult of youth. Drinking has become (it seems to me the non-drinker) an activity that is supposed to return us to our youth when we could act stupid and talk stupid and it was OK cause we were drunk. Or maybe i'm just old and grouchy now.

    80. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      P.S., one of my health teachers locked the door and basically violated the law by giving us proper safe sex education.

      I can't be the only one reading this wrong...

    81. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by JBaustian · · Score: 1

      Foolish parents, sending their children to a public school!

      I don't have kids, but if I did they'd be home-schooled. And I wouldn't wait until they are 14 before introducing them to "Ender's Game".

    82. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by PMuse · · Score: 1

      People don't want their kids exposed to things that'll make them think about sex.

      A wise (and frequently stoned) man once wrote:

      VAN DYKE
      Show the average American teenage male a condom and his mind will turn to thoughts of lust.

      TOBY
      Show the average American teenage male a lug wrench and his mind'll turn to...

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    83. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      Having worked in the classroom before...I want to shake your hand for your observation about the current situation in education.

      Even taught kindergarten several years ago so the teacher could go on her honeymoon. Was told by the parent of one boy who was on his second year of this class...he doesn't know how to wipe his arse when he goes to the bathroom...so you will have to do it for him. When I picked my jaw up from the ground...I told her I was his teacher for the week...not his hygiene coach. As she stammered...also commented that his bathroom training should have been completed several years before he got to school. The mother was not happy...but I never had to wipe his arse and was not going to do so.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    84. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't want their kids exposed to things that'll make them think about sex.

      Middle school kids think about sex at least all the time they spend awake, no particular "things" needed to make them to.

    85. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by MJMullinII · · Score: 1

      Shut the fuck up Donny!

      --
      "Don't be a martyr -- BE THE ONE WHO GOT AWAY!"
    86. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe he doesn't quite realize the full consequences of his action, but he was still trying to maliciously harm the teacher.

      Yeah, but where did he learn that behavior? From his parents and/or from school which DEFINITELY teaches spite and malice, and I don't mean the card game. He's absorbing his environment, what do you expect? But I can and do expect more of parents and schools. I am damned unsatisfied with the state of public education in this country.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    87. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      To be fair to the parent, "Ender's Game" almost looks like "Rear Enders Games" -- my favorite magazine.

      It's an honest mistake. Really. Anyone could have made it.

    88. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually come to think of it, a female teacher telling some young boys(and girls) about fictional, futuristic kids walking around i the nude could come across to the KIDS as being pornographic. And then the whole penis on commander's desk scene. You know how easily kids are influenced these days. Next thing you know some brat is putting his ugly penis on the principals desk because he heard it in ender's game

    89. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      I think maybe tyhe teacher was confused. Enders Game may have a child protagonist, but it is not a kids book. But really, pornographic??? Some of the fanfic maybe, but I never got wood reading the original material!
      Maybe the parent was concerned their childs intellect might be aroused?

    90. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. As a person in high school who was showering after gym class, blindsided and knocked to the ground, and stood over while being ridiculed and laughed at, then minutes later when I had changed and was making my way to the next class, I was punched in the back of the head by the same person at full running force in a monitored hall and nearly blacked out (dropped to my knees), and neither incident had any punishment to the teachers that witnessed it or the student who did it,... ...I'm astounded that _reading_ about something like this in a _fictional_ book is grounds for anything.

    91. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wow... Reading through that script, I'm thinking I really should have watched that show.

    92. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by serbanp · · Score: 1

      yeah, yeah, blame it on Mr. Lincoln for wasting this unique chance to keep SC out of the Union...

    93. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      I have watched the complete series twice, it is a work of art in my opinion, so damn good :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    94. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before everyone gets their jumpsuits in a ruffle, read the whole F'ing article and the update it links to, which implies there is more to this than just Ender's Game. http://ordinary-gentlemen.com/blog/2012/03/20/a-quick-omg-update-on-enders-game-south-carolina/

    95. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One, it's just fiction.

      Two, they were only insects, FFS.

    96. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      The student is not to blame, even if they were looking for a way to strike out at a teacher.

      I have to disagree, sort of. I learned at a very young age that hurting other people isn't cool, even if you don't like them. I suspect I learned that lesson by being bullied. (Note: I am not in favor of the anti-bullying efforts being thrown around... the political and business worlds are hierarchical and if you can't learn early when and how to stand your ground, that's natural.)

      Children are loaded guns.

      They have the capacity to do incredible harm to adults. They're real people with real individual culpability. They may not have decades of life-experience but really, after you break a few toys as a toddler you should learn that actions have consequence and that hurting a person is something that can rarely be undone. I'll agree that parents have a part in teaching that, but it's really up to the kid to learn the things that the parent and reality are teaching them. Being ignorant and non-receptive is a character fault of nobody but the kid.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    97. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      I mean... if it were the same in terms of arousal effectiveness, I imagine radio porn would be rampant.

      There's an interesting gender disparity here, actually. In outline form, (1) Men are usually very visual in terms of arousal, far moreso than women; (2) women tend to find arousal in personality traits and their own imaginations; (3) women don't care about porn nearly as much as men. Because of (1), radio porn probably wouldn't appeal to most men anyway. Because of (2), it would appeal to women, but because of (3), there's not a large market for it.

      (1) Take advertisements (my view is US-centric; sorry). If they use sex appeal, the vast majority of the time they use sexy, scantily clad women. Shots with lots of cleavage predominate, with full-length leg shots and occasional (sometimes not-so-occasional) butt shots thrown in. Seeing a woman on TV in a tiny bikini is completely standard. Seeing a man in a speedo is rare and seeing him in less only happens on specialty shows that are probably trying to appeal to gay men (True Blood; QAF; Being Human; etc.). Usually men used for sex appeal on a general audience are shown from the abs up, probably since advertisers don't view it as worth upsetting people just to appeal a little more to women. The vast majority of magazines also feature sexy women on the cover.

      (2) Female models usually wear a sort of serious frown. Male models often wear a great smile, presumably indicating how kind they are and how good their sense of humor is. A man in a tuxedo is a common cliche, presumably because it indicates wealth, style, etc. Even the "bad boy" stereotype is about personality traits and only peripherally looks. My local grocery store has a few shelves of romance novels. They're all for straight women. Yes, they have a hunky, scantily clad man on the front, but the vast majority of the experience in reading the book is purely in the woman's imagination. Men rarely read porn, though we certainly watch a lot of it. I remember reading an interview with an author of gay romances. He said his female audience had become larger than his male audience. Also, if you see a mismatched couple in terms of physical attractiveness, usually it's a hot woman with an ugly man (though I think this is also tied to income disparity).

      [To be clear, the above is not to say that women don't like hot men. There's a lot of individual variation, and I'm obviously speaking in terms of general trends.]

      (3) Playgirl's circulation has never approached Playboy's. Even then, from a 2003 interview, "Fifty percent of Playgirl's readership is [gay] male", and a more recent number I saw put it at 80%. Considering only ~3% of the population is composed of gay males and ~45% is straight females, the disparity is very large. A trans man I know (that is, female sex == genitalia, male gender == social identity) once mentioned to me how, after starting testosterone treatments, he understood men's "need" for porn. I imagine testosterone simply makes us far hornier.

      (Sorry for such an offtopic post, but I don't find discussing this story worthwhile. It's almost entirely sensational--the article spends a lot of time saying how conflicting the reports are, so passing any judgement now is premature.)

    98. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry Mr. Virgin, you may get laid one day and become a parent yourself.

    99. Re:"I Heard Your Giant's Drink Game is Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that was a Sysadmin, or has John McClane learned about IT?

  2. Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We need to find something to do for these people who just sit at home waiting for things to get outraged at (a.k.a. the “volleyball is exclusionary and tag promotes violence” types).

    Some probably poses at least basic intelligence and education. Surely there is some way they can be made a useful part of our society. I think if they had something productive to focus on, we wouldn’t hear about stupid shit like this as often.

    On a more serious note, I get that some people get off on being outraged/protesting/fighting something. We all know people like this. In a lot of cases they aren’t even really into the cause, they just like being behind something. When they have kids, it’s like a whole new world of stuff to complain about is opened up.

    I’m sure this isn’t the first time the school has heard from her (ok, I’m gonna be sexist.. but this _has_ to be the Mother (Mother with a capital "M".. you know the type..)). You don’t go from 0 to this. I just wish these people would think about everyone else they hurt when they indulge their need to whine and at least try to put that energy into something more helpful to the world.

    1. Re:Put them to work by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem isn't the outrage, it's that it's aimed at useless targets. By and large, the bigger problem with our society is complacency. When we really need outrage, e.g., to put bankers in jail for their crimes, the same busibodies are nowhere to be found.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a really good point, actually.

    3. Re:Put them to work by Anrego · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing about protesting that kind of thing, is you put yourself at risk. This is largely why I am part of that complacent mass. I have a job, a home, a bright looking future. I think there's lots of problems with the world that should be fixed, but I sure as hell am not going to risk losing what I have. The only people who can protest this stuff are people who don't have much to begin with, and they just get shrugged off as "jobless hippies". It's actually a suspiciously well engineered little system.

      Calling up the school in a huff because the cafeteria serves junk food on the other hand.. very low risk for the bored stay at home mom..

    4. Re:Put them to work by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's TP the mother's home. My mom was/is very conservative but she never made a fuss about literature she found objectionable. She simply told the teacher that her kid would not be reading that book/seeing the movie until he was older (high school). That's the proper way to handle it. Like an adult instead of a whiny little bitch demanding the teacher be fired.

      Nudity == nudity not porn. It is our natural state and nothing to be ashamed of.

      Porn == sex. I don't recall any sex in Ender's Game (or the sequel Speaker for the Dead). So NOT pornographic.

      This is as crazy as the government arresting teens who took nude photos with their phones, and then claiming it's porn. It isn't porn if there's no sex stupid cops and stupid politicians. Arrest them for the actual crime committed (nudity)..... oh that's right. The SCOTUS said nudity is not a crime.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    5. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like Obama should get an orange jumpsuit for Crimes Against Unwritten Natural Law?

      Or which particular laws did you have in mind and which particular bankers should be charged under them?

    6. Re:Put them to work by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
      To continue on the serious note, everyone, I mean everyone, complains that boys don't read. The fact is that if a boy is brought up int he average school, he is given nothing, and excuse my language, but chick lit to read. The only reason I read was because my father read and it was stuff interesting to boys. Heinlein, Pohl, etc. It was pulp, but it got me into the habit of reading so i could read more of the conventional and socially acceptable stuff.

      I mean school is so screwed up that when we read the Canterbury Tales, the cool tales were the ones that could not be assigned.

      To go into conspiracy theory time I think the conservatives don't want kids to read. The books that are allowed tend to enforce a traditional world view that is common to those who are less intelligent. The books that challenge that view, and are allowed, tend to end with the protagonist learning that the protest was a youthful indiscretion.

      So Ender's Game, though written by a very traditional homophobe, certainly challenges the conservative world view and does not end well. Though the male dominated world is validated, there is an indication that doning anything to win a war. As so often happens, single incidences in the book are used to provide cover for objections that is really about general content. In effect, too many parents are afraid when their children learn to think.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:Put them to work by governorx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The teacher should be fired. The kids should have been reading their own books instead of having the book read aloud to them. How can everyone else be so far off topic?

    8. Re:Put them to work by cptdondo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To continue on the serious note, everyone, I mean everyone, complains that boys don't read. The fact is that if a boy is brought up int he average school, he is given nothing, and excuse my language, but chick lit to read. The only reason I read was because my father read and it was stuff interesting to boys. Heinlein, Pohl, etc. It was pulp, but it got me into the habit of reading so i could read more of the conventional and socially acceptable stuff.

      My kid had no interest in reading until I got him started on Ben Bova's Orion series. He's 11 and loves it. Yes it's full violence, and sex, and "porn" - I mean, sex with a goddess while covered with animal entrails amid a stone age civilization? It doesn't get any better!

      The early Card stuff is next; Planet Called Treason, Ender's Game, you name it. Those are boy books!

      I mean school is so screwed up that when we read the Canterbury Tales, the cool tales were the ones that could not be assigned.

      Hehe... I read The Wife Of Bath with my 14 year old daughter. Nothing like the prologue where she rants about the uselessness of virginity. Again, want to hold a teenager's attention while reading the classics? Show then the classics!

    9. Re:Put them to work by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 0

      This is largely why I am part of that complacent mass. I have a job, a home, a bright looking future. I think there's lots of problems with the world that should be fixed, but I sure as hell am not going to risk losing what I have.

      Don't worry; when the jack-booted thugs do finally come for what you have earned you can stop being complacent. I'm sure they'll be reasonable.

    10. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds less pornographic than a basic human physiology textbook. At least those have illustrations, with all that hot, steamy, exposed musculature.

    11. Re:Put them to work by Paracelcus · · Score: 2

      You're right, there are people (mostly with limited education/room temp IQ's) who really love to say that ANYTHING the don't understand is sinful/pornographic/anti-American and since they really understand nothing....

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    12. Re:Put them to work by multimediavt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a job, a home, a bright looking future. I think there's lots of problems with the world that should be fixed, but I sure as hell am not going to risk losing what I have.

      Then, frankly, you don't belong in a democratic society. The whole point of our society and especially how the U.S. was set up to begin with was so that anyone in the populous could fight for what they believe is right without the fear of losing everything they have for speaking up. I am beginning to think that complacency isn't the real problem here, cowardice is. When did America get castrated by the corporations and the bullies? It's a sad day in a democracy when the people are afraid to say something is right or wrong because they are afraid to lose everything.

    13. Re:Put them to work by dunnomattic · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't the outrage, it's that it's aimed at useless targets.

      Here in the US, I believe we are seeing the result of not having an identifiable enemy in most people's recent memory -- or at least, not an enemy that poses an existential threat to the ordinary citizen. Generations before us had readily discernible targets in the Nazis/Communists/Fascists of the world. Today, we hear an echo of that from the right-side of political spectrum in regard to fundamentalist Islam. However, that's my premise: the vast majority of our "enemies" today are faceless ideologies.

      I believe the instinctual pulls of self-preservation and tribalism have remained, but have been directed internally. For example, I live in a largely prosperous area. The first- and second-hand accounts I've experienced of someone threatening to "call CPS" for the purpose of dissuading another's behaviour are astounding. People are misdirecting their inherent aggressions at their neighbors. The relative comforts many people enjoy also means they have plenty of time to judge the actions of others. If someone's behaviour doesn't fit with their model, then they find a way to punish that individual.

      The more laws, rules and regulations there are one the books, the easier it is to incriminate a person. That means these useless targets are easy prey.

      --
      ...when everything is a crime, everyone is a criminal.
    14. Re:Put them to work by bragr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah but in the minds of conservative, sex negative parents (or non parents for that matter), acknowledging that sex exists, or even that there are differences between "boy parts" and "girl parts" is basically the same thing as showing the kids a full length interracial, midget, anal gang-bang.

    15. Re:Put them to work by Zordak · · Score: 1

      I don't recall any sex in Ender's Game (or the sequel Speaker for the Dead). So NOT pornographic.

      Well, except for the major plot point about Ender outing Novinha as an adulteress who had six kids and a sterile husband. But it wasn't exactly graphic.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    16. Re:Put them to work by jdastrup · · Score: 1

      You missed one very important piece of "For the most part this is what happened...":

      People were borrowing more money than they could afford to pay back. It's as simple as that. Nobody forced them to borrow more than they could afford. They were stupid.

    17. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Your sniveling cowardice makes me want to vomit. You deserve to be stomped. Unfortunately, your disgusting weakness will only get OTHER people stomped. I have been raising hell about getting critical problems fixed for 20 years or so, occasionally WINNING those fights, and guess what? There have been NO destructive consequences to my life. None. Zero.

      Nothing can be done for people like you. Go whimper in your little corner, terrified of any word or act that might challenge the absolute dominance of your Rightful Lords And Masters.

    18. Re:Put them to work by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      For the most part this is what happened.

      Your explanation of events is either pure ignorance or a calculated lie.
      I could cite an endless list of articles to rebut your post, but I won't.
      The fact that fraud was committed on a massive scale isn't in dispute by anyone except you.
      Feel free to bring up your own citations though. Difficulty: no fringe websites.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    19. Re:Put them to work by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When the parents send their children to the 6th grade illiterate without complaint, how are they expecting the teacher to get them interested in reading or literature? My son could read at 4 before I sent him to school for the 1st grade. Sure, something like Ender's game would be above him, but he's 5 and in the first grade, he reads "run spot run" books.

      Why is it the fault of the teacher that parents are happy to raise children who are illiterate and the parents actively discourage literacy?

    20. Re:Put them to work by Anrego · · Score: 2

      I'm Canadian, but the argument does stand.

      Either way, self sacrifice isn't a common trait. For every person who's willing to put their life on the line, there's 1000 who arn't. That's just reality. More importantly, we'll replace those who do stand up.

      Those corporations and bullies are _very_ good at pushing us as far as they can get away with, without pushing us far enough to say to hell with it. The middle class is for the most part (despite how people like to characterise us as unhappy slaves) happy.

    21. Re:Put them to work by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      So parents should be able to dictate what their children are taught in school?

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    22. Re:Put them to work by Anrego · · Score: 1

      that might challenge the absolute dominance of your Rightful Lords And Masters.

      Long as they keep me happy.

      Either way, for every one of you.. there's thousands of me.. I'm just honest about it.

      There have been NO destructive consequences to my life. None. Zero.

      I'm not talking about attending a protest here or sending angry letters. The kind of action that will actually change anything would definitely fuck with anyones life...

    23. Re:Put them to work by tibit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. I can't help but chuckle at the outrage when I tell the neighbors that we had a fairly decent intro to mammalian reproductory systems in grade 4 biology. Oh yeah, we did have biology and history as separate subjects starting in grade 4, then chemistry and physics starting in grade 5.

      The biggest conservative idiocy IMHO is the whine about sexualizing/objectifying children. Well, it's the adults who do it for crying out loud, not kids! For a kid, learning about the reproductive system has no subtexts at all, and is just as much of a non-loaded topic as learning about, say, basics of organic chemistry like perchance simple hydrocarbons. People who believe that knowledge of the reproductive system is somehow a taboo/dirty subject are the ones where the problem is -- it's not with the subject, nor with the kids, it's with the parents who unfortunately were not brought up in a sane environment, and their minds got so warped around those subjects that they can't deal with them in a normal way.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    24. Re:Put them to work by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Jon Corzine walks free after stealing 1.2 billion dollars and giving it to Jamie Dimion.

      First two criminals to pop into MY head. No-one seems to even be INVESTIGATING, nevermind that the case is so cut and dried at least Corzine should already have been convicted by now.

    25. Re:Put them to work by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's selection bias at play, but just go to notalwaysright and weep at the stories there...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    26. Re:Put them to work by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      That was, IIRC, in Xenocide, but not in the books mentioned.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    27. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoiler Alert:

      He kills the kid he fought in the shower... They're not mad about the child murdering another child, they're mad about naked.

      What the fuck.

    28. Re:Put them to work by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Like a billion dollars of no risk farmer's money disappearing from MF Global's accounts in anonymous wire-transfers.

      And there are still no culprits swinging from ropes.

      Seriously, the banking conglomerates pulled one of the biggest hat tricks ever, in conjunction with the U.S. government.

      It's disgusting. Meanwhile, Joe average is at the mercy of hundreds of thousands of laws and few loopholes.

      Fun Fun Fun

    29. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is largely why I am part of that complacent mass. I have a job, a home, a bright looking future.

      There is no "YOUR future." There is simply THE future. Whether the future for you will be bright depends on many millions of other people. Maybe you're going along quietly, making all the right friends and doing all the right things. Then a couple of dirty bombs go off in some major cities, the government fragments, maybe some members of your family die in the crossfire. Suddenly it is all too obvious that the future is something that happens to you, not something you can control directly. You can influence it a bit, of course, but you seem content to sit back, do nothing and assume everything will turn out all right. Looking at how things have gone over the past 15-20 years, seeing the kind of anger which is surfacing in all sorts of different people, looking at the examples of political revolution which are beginning to sweep across the globe, I choose to assume that everything will NOT necessarily be just fine for me in the coming 20-30 years.

    30. Re:Put them to work by mariox19 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I remember watching a movie, The Firm, where Tom Cruise plays a lawyer working for a firm that turns out to be in the employ of the Mob. The firm operates by mean of a gloved fist. In one scene, Cruise's wife and another wife of a partner at the firm are walking together -- the other wife is a real Stepford Wife type -- when the subject of children comes up. Cruise's wife says that she and her husband plan on having children.

      "Oh, good" says the other wife. "The firm encourages family. It promotes stability."

      In the context of the film, it was obvious that there was ultimately menace behind the firm's "encouragement," but as soon as I saw that scene I thought, "Holy shit! That's how society works. That's what the status quo holds over people's heads." I was young at the time, so it was like a revelation. Later, when I became a history major, I learned that the Norman's of France made their way all over Europe, conquering lands, and were also very active in the Crusades, and all because the bulk of them were unmarried men with nothing to lose and everything to gain. (Inheritance laws deprived younger sons of any automatic livelihood.)

      I guess what I'm trying to say is your point speaks to something fundamental in human society.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    31. Re:Put them to work by mjtaylor24601 · · Score: 1

      People were borrowing more money than they could afford to pay back. It's as simple as that. Nobody forced them to borrow more than they could afford. They were stupid.

      If I may play devil's advocate for a moment...

      The banks were lending people more money than they could ever hope to pay back. It's as simple as that. Nobody forced them to lend people money they should have known they would never be able to repay. They were stupid.

      There is plenty of blame to go around in the sub-prime mortgage debacle. I'm not saying we need to haul off bankers in orange jumpsuits, but they should shoulder their fair share.

      --
      I wish I were as sure of anything as some people are of everything
    32. Re:Put them to work by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I agree with you for the most part, but the definition of porn, not so much.

      Porn is pretty much whatever you can whack off too. Specifically, what the majority can whack off too.

      Nudity, even while not exposing that much, can be quite erotic. Try telling somebody from China a couple thousand years ago that a simple picture of a girls unbound feet was not porn.

      It's still quite ridiculous though. There is an awful lot of literature that exposes children to situations a hell of lot darker than imaginary nudity (I am assuming it was not illustrated).

    33. Re:Put them to work by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course they should. What do you think the school system is for exactly?

      No offense, I'm against this book ban and any other on a school wide scale, but parents should always have the last word on education (since they could after-all simply homeschool if they had the resources). There's no reason a public school system should have the right to dictate education without parental approval, unless you believe in something other than the freedoms America no longer stands for, of course.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    34. Re:Put them to work by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1, Informative

      Stop the FUD about OSC being a homophobe -- he's responded many times to this allegation and there's no proof of it except in conspiracy-minded idiots' rantings.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    35. Re:Put them to work by Anrego · · Score: 1

      That's a given.. nothing is for certain, and you can go from top of the world to zero pretty damn fast.

      That said.. what exactly is the alternative. Live a less happy life waging a futile battle against something that likely will never impact me?

      It's like doomsday survivalists. Sure you can spend a good portion of your life preparing to deal with something that will probably never happen.. or you can spend that time enjoying the life you are trying to protect (of course I suspect most people see this activity as a hobby they enjoy.. so it's all very cyclical..).

      (Also, for the record.. I'm Canadian. Things arn't as bleak up here yet..)

    36. Re:Put them to work by Sperbels · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your sniveling cowardice makes me want to vomit.You deserve to be stomped. Unfortunately, your disgusting weakness will only get OTHER people stomped. I have been raising hell about getting critical problems fixed for 20 years or so, occasionally WINNING those fights, and guess what? There have been NO destructive consequences to my life. None. Zero.

      ...Says the guy posting anonymously. Nice.

    37. Re:Put them to work by dan828 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually reading TFA, they've posted an update that, more than likely, the offending material wasn't from Ender's Game at all, but probably some other, unrelated, material from the internets. Card thinks that his book was lumped in because it's been a perennial target of the evangelical right due to his being a Mormon.

    38. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At least at the end of your life you'll be able to look back and say "I've never risked anything". Good for you.

    39. Re:Put them to work by Hatta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What crimes?

      Mortgage fraud, perjury, racketeering.

      Should we put in jail the average Banker (middle class/lower middle class) who just follows company policy, and greets you with a smile?

      No, we should put the highest level CEOs in jail. The ones who are responsible for the pattern of racketeering activity. Just like the Mafia, you don't get to run a criminal organization and claim you have clean hands.

      For the most part this is what happened.

      You left a lot out of the summary. Like the part where most loans they were rebundling were known to the banks to be 90% fraudulent. How did they know? Congress and the FBI warned them about it. What did they do in response? They increased the number and percentage of so called "liars loans" they issued. They doubled down on practices they knew were fraudulent.

      Tell me, what innocent explanation is there for that behavior?

      The problem is Outrage. Outrage is getting mad at things that have already happened, it isn't productive method of try to make sure it doesn't happen.

      If you're not mad enough to punish people who have done wrong in the past, there will be no deterrent to stop people from doing it again. If bankers know they can crash the economy and get bonuses for it, why wouldn't they do it again?

      For most events if you are Outraged it means you don't know enough about what happened or you just more interested in revenge then actually solving the problem.

      In your case, you're not outraged because you don't know enough about what happened. Either that, or you're deliberately shilling for the banks.

      Go read William Black's book and/or columns. He's the guy who put nearly a thousand bankers in jail in the much smaller S&L crisis under Reagan. He argues forcefully, with plenty of evidence, that outright fraud was the reason for the crisis, and the only reason we can't prosecute this fraud is political corruption. Is his outrage due to being underinformed?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    40. Re:Put them to work by EdIII · · Score: 1

      In effect, too many parents are afraid when their children learn to think

      There not afraid, but sincerely disapprove. Thinking leads to questioning, and for some parents, in some cultures, that just cannot happen. Usually in the more religiously strict households. You don't question your parents, authority, or the church. Period.

      That is just so intensely sad to me. It should be the goal of every parent to raise a child to think as early as possible. Always be proactive on gaining all the information you can and come to your own conclusions, or at least attempt to verify other's conclusions.

      I was very much influenced by literature when I was younger and had supportive parents that always encouraged me to think for myself.

    41. Re:Put them to work by medcalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem to have a childish, cartoonish view of conservatives. You should get out more; it's good for you.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    42. Re:Put them to work by KhabaLox · · Score: 2

      The fact is that if a boy is brought up int he average school, he is given nothing, and excuse my language, but chick lit to read.

      Yeah, I couldn't stand being forced to read all that Chick Lit, like "A Separate Peace," "Catcher in the Rye," "Lord of the Flies," "Huckleberry Finn," or "The Great Gatsby."

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    43. Re:Put them to work by plover · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't care about the crazy soccer moms here. I care that the school board is failing utterly at their job. They are supposed to insulate teachers from crazy parents. They are supposed to be rational, and say "Yes, Mrs. Smith, we heard you, but we leave individual book assignments to the teachers. If you're unhappy with the content the public education system provides, take your child down the street to the private school that more closely matches your morals. Yes, we know it's expensive, but that's your choice."

      And yes, a vocal minority of outraged parents (bonded together by a common hatred of porn / literature / science / logic / foreign accents / whatever) will put up their own flat-earth candidate, and will get that school board member fired. Term limits of one would prevent them from worrying about it too much.

      Instead, what this school board did is told all their teachers "you're going to get fired for teaching anything that goes against the arbitrary capricious whims of any nutcake parent." And they told every nutcake parent in the district "want to get that unmarried pregnant teacher fired? Just accuse her of having dyed her hair, we're just as crazy as you and we'll fire her for you." That board may as well not exist for all the good they're doing their school system.

      --
      John
    44. Re:Put them to work by toriver · · Score: 1

      The banks' consultants, driven by commissions and bonuses, did not perhaps force them, but nor did they do what would benefit both parties: Decide that the loan should not be granted and the would-be borrower should look for cheaper options that they could afford.

      Bonus systems encourage behavior that promotes the employee's selfishness (maximizing bonus) at the cost of the interests of both his employer in the long run, and those of the customer.

    45. Re:Put them to work by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Pornography refers to material which is obscene, such that it contains little or no artistic merit. It has nothing to do with sex.

    46. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a conservative, I just have to say, stereotype much?

    47. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that the system is "well engineered", it's just that by and large, western democracies ARE rich countries with strong middle classes compared to the rest of history. I don't think our ancestors were less complacent than us, it's just that the mass of people who had nothing to lose was much bigger back then.

      So it's engineered in the sense that our system remains stable because there is actually a lot of people who benefit from it compared to past history. Which is a good thing. The system's stability can be seen as a consequence of its success in wealth redistribution.

      Of course, that doesn't excuse complacency. We certainly could do better.

    48. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, I prefer to use object.Equals for comparisons, maybe that's just me. In any case;

      if(!nudity.Equals(porn) && !porn.Equals(sex))
                DoSmut("filthy");

    49. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe... I read The Wife Of Bath with my 14 year old daughter. Nothing like the prologue where she rants about the uselessness of virginity. Again, want to hold a teenager's attention while reading the classics? Show then the classics!

      My son got a lot more interested in Greek / Roman mythology when I asked him, exactly, where the Minotaur came from.

    50. Re:Put them to work by jdastrup · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But for someone to summarize what happened, and not include the most blatant obvious fact that people were borrowing more money than they could ever pay back, makes for a ridiculous summary. Blame the government, blame the corporations, but the people are innocent, is pretty lame. Go join the Occupiers....

    51. Re:Put them to work by ehiris · · Score: 1

      They knew very well that it is impossible for people to pay back those high-interest loans. Bankers gave them anyway because they knew that their friends in government would bail them out eventually. Short-term they paid themselves outrageously high bonuses that they didn't need to show long-term viability for.

      So yes, it's a form of organized stealing.

      Outrage wasn't a problem and it was minimal. The French showed what proper outrage at such a system should look like.

    52. Re:Put them to work by Securityemo · · Score: 4, Informative

      That'd be unthinkable here in sweden. Every school is required to have the same educational standards in order to insure that everyone (in theory) gets equal education and access to information. Homeschooling is not allowed. So for example, a deeply religious parent could not (legally) deny their child "inappropriate" views on contraception, religion, or in any other way restrict their mental freedom completely.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    53. Re:Put them to work by fermion · · Score: 1
      In the context of current conservative though, opposing the requirement that a women to be raped by order of the state prior to having acces to an abortion is liberal. Anyone who opposed the stated mandated rape would be roundly criticized by conservative establishment. This does not mean that someone who says a women should not be raped is a great proponent of the women's right to control her own medical care, or even that such a person considers a women to be a person, simply that that person understands that state regulation of a doctor patient relationship is wrong, and the state mandating frivolous medical procedures, or create government board to tell a person what or what not can be done, is wrong.

      Likewise, if there was a law that prohibited prayer in anyplace outside of a religious institution, I could say I was not an anti-religious zealot because I only supported the enforcement in flagrant cases, for instance, where a family was praying in public in a distracting manner, or where someone was having a party and playing Fireflight too loud. Then we could bring them to court and prosecute them for playing. You see, I don't hate the people who choose to worship false idols and fails to follow the bible(Matthew 6:5), I simply want an ordered society where we follow the rule of law. That I get to harass people who annoy me, even when they are in the privacy of their own home, is just frosting on the cake.

      Just because one hates a little less than one peers does not give the person a right to deny their bigotry. Is a person who only burns down empty churches and synagogues any less of a bigot than someone who shoot the members? I would think not. Just because one is a little less hateful and therefore is ridiculed by one's peers, does that give free reign to other denegate the annoying people? I don't think so.

      I believe that Card thinks he is not a homophobe just like rush thinks he did nothing wrong on his little trip to the DR or Santorum thinks that he believes he has respect for the ability of woman to think for herself. And all these people are probably a little less crazy than some of the other people in their peer group, and for that we can be thankful. That there are some insane people who are not so insane as to actually want to do harm to the people they hate, unless, or course, they don't know their place. People who are just keeping the lesser folks in their place and enforcing the norms of society, then, are to thanks, not called out for who they are.

      Which is to say that I know where Card is coming from, and by the measure of the religious right that wishes to convert anyone they do not agree with I am sure he is a flaming liberal that love to bend over for Obama, but in the world where love and tolerance and acceptance prevail, only a homophobe could write something like that. The rest of us believe that we adults should be able to have consensual sex in our homes and show affection for who we please outdoors. After all, I don't see police harassing straight couples leaving the theatre.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    54. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you are exactly the entire problem with the world today. Congratulations, "homeowner". You somehow think you are immune to this. Until they take what YOU have away.

      At least the bored stay at home mom has BALLS. Is not a good little robot doing what she's told. It must be comforting being a cog in a machine, thinking you are somehow necessary all on your lonesome. You are not. The system cares not for you in any way. So enjoy it while it lasts. When the US economy fully collapses who are you going to be begging for fresh water or food? You are a mindless, useless, nobody in a world full of mindless useless nobodies. Congratu-fucking-lations. You made it to the big time buddy, you have a MORTGAGE!

      LOL...

    55. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Porn == sex.

      Graphic = image

      'Reading' a book is not images. Any image is the result of the individual creating one inside their heads.

      What sort of sicko is this parent, what sort of images does she dream up.
       

    56. Re:Put them to work by Genda · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't have a problem with psycho-Mom. The world is rife with people whose pants/panties are on WAY TO FRIGGIN TIGHT. You nod your head up and down, shake it occasionally when they break into tears, pat them on the back, and call their doctors to find out if their prescription needs adjustment.

      I'm angry and more than a little upset with the School Administration. One of their most important jobs is to protect teachers from Idiot Parents. I mean if the teacher was reading to first graders, just let her know that the reading is being wasted on kids who won't be able to get the finer points of the story for at least 5 more years and that perhaps she should be reading selections from Harry Potter. Of course I'm clear that in this school reading from Harry Potter will probably get you lynched because of lack of a good solid Christian story line, but it would be more age appropriate.

      If in fact her students were in middle school (the best time to read this story), then they should have read it themselves and reported on it, of course this a school in South Carolina (ranks at 42nd of 50, in a country that is ranked below Latvia in reading skill.) Perhaps the young teens couldn't read it for themselves. In any case, sexualizing a clearly non-sexual piece of literature and punishing people for reading it to children is demonstration of minds so small and closed as to be proper demonstration grounds for Van der valls forces. When faith destroys reason, then you end up with neither.

    57. Re:Put them to work by malraid · · Score: 1

      A lot of these banks are public companies. Is widely documented that bankers were saying that their banks were solid while trying to get funds from the Fed to stay afloat. This was done to prevent a run on the stock, but it not only mislead the public, it also mislead the stockholders. I think this goes beyond neglect, and into maybe fraud. The Fed helped keep things under wrap to (hopefully) prevent an even worse crisis. But I think this is illegal, besides going against capitalism. And this is the stuff we know about ... One account of it: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-28/secret-fed-loans-undisclosed-to-congress-gave-banks-13-billion-in-income.html

      --
      please excuse my apathy
    58. Re:Put them to work by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile in the real world, the middle class is enjoying life..

    59. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Santorum does not win anymore states, and if Romney is put on top by the end of April I will stop thinking of conservatives, or at least those that vote republican, I will stop thinking of conservatives as one dimensional cartoon(all my conservative friends are for Gingrich, BTW). If Conservative stop implying that birth control should not be covered by health insurance because it promotes promiscuous sex, but viagra is because it allows old men successful men to divorce their wives and carry on adulterous relationships with younger trophy mistresses, then I will stop thinking conservatives are simply stupider version of Yogi Bear. When religious figures are more concerned with helping people rather than attacking people whom the do not agree and protecting their tax exempt status, I will assume they are not just some insane Pepe le Pew.

    60. Re:Put them to work by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, you are lazy. There is no risk in contacting your representatives and having a discussion with them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    61. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They most certainly should not have the last word on education. No where in the constitution does it mention anything remotely like this.
      If they want to control what the kid is taught they have every right to homeschool him/her. If they do not care enough to do this then the kid gets taught what everyone else is, period. There is no excuse to not homeschooling your children if you want control over there education. Leave everyone else alone.

    62. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > boys don't read.

      At 14 or 15 I didn't read much, a few 'illustrated classics, MAD magazine, certainly not the class books.

      Then in the school library I found 'Brave New World', '1984', 'Animal Farm' and from then for several years I read at least one, often 2 or 3, Sci-Fi book a week for several years.

    63. Re:Put them to work by geekoid · · Score: 1

      As someone who has changed views and votes of my Representative, I can say 2 things:
      1) Yes, communicating with them can create change, and
      2) You're a fucking idiot. Stop living in the world you think there is and live in the real world.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    64. Re:Put them to work by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course they should. What do you think the school system is for exactly?

      It is for ensuring that society has the adequately knowledgeable citizens that are required for the maintenance of a functional economy, functional democracy, public health etc. A public school system should absolutely not be subject to the whims of parents.

      If you believe in the profess of knowledge, it makes no sense to have a previous generation impose limitations on the next.

    65. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. is a republic, not a democracy.

    66. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      REALLY?

      Have you TALKED to some of these parents you say should be directing education?

      They are FUCKING IDIOTS. They learned nothing themselves in school, and you want THEM to dictate what everybody else teaches and learns?

      You are out of your fucking mind. Parents are the last people to dictate what their children learn.

      For titty-fucking-christs sake we have game shows that show just how stupid adults are compared to a 5th grader.

      What does that have to do with freedom? If those particular parents have a problem with the school system, they can keep their kids home. End of story. Getting involved in what OTHER people teach/learn is insane. Totally insane.

       

    67. Re:Put them to work by Genda · · Score: 2

      Clearly history is not your forte'. People have uttered your very words since the Babylonians, only acting when it was finally their necks on the chopping block, and by then far too late to save themselves. Read about wealthy Jews in Germany in the 1920s and 30s. They stayed because they were so certain it would never get them, they were happy, well to do, connected. Their bodies looked just like everyone else's stacked like cord-wood behind concentration camps.

      You risk what have and what your children will have, by your inaction. You say your future is bright. So how will you handle economic or environmental collapse? This isn't to say that said collapse is inevitable or even imminent. But it is perfectly predictable, and without substantial intervention, the bright future you speak of is a pipe dream. You want to get grounded in reality and really begin getting interested in what is in your best interest now, and the future.

      Being a bit older than you (I'm presuming by how you describe yourself), I've lived through a lot of the trends and choices that got us here. I've seen the big mistakes. Witnessed the stupid stuff at work, and made and lost fortunes in growing economic turmoil. Whatever it is that you think you're clinging to, its an illusion. The time to wake up is well past. Addressing reality with all due haste would behoove us all.

    68. Re:Put them to work by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's not the simple. Many people where lied to, had information hidden, or had change to the contract latter. Since the loan was split among many investors, those people had NO recourse. It would get bogged down in trying to contact all the investors and get them all to agree to certain things in individual loans. This practice was rampant.

      Many people COULD afford then, and then the economy went down the rapper, causing MORE people to be out of work and then spiral.

      And yes, some people bought a home that they could afford hopping to flip it. Those people I could care less about, but they are in the minority.

      Then people who were trying to gte out where basically ignored by the banks. I'n my case, I was out of work briefly, 3 months. During that time I went on a special mortgage plan. That was years ago and the banks STILL haven't worked it out. I make MORE money then I did when I bought it. I can easily make my payments again. But they can't get it through the fucking process. Every quarter, I have to go through the same shit,. Fill out the same paper work, send the same letter to another new person. 5 years I've been doing this.
      The way mortgage are allowed to be cut up has fucked then entire system, and made is so brokers that lie are almost impossible to prosecute.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    69. Re:Put them to work by smelch · · Score: 1

      Um, what exactly do you think happened in Speaker for the Dead if not Ender speaking for the dead Marcao?

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    70. Re:Put them to work by geekoid · · Score: 1

      no it isn't. I see nothing in his post that is incorrect.

      I think YOU need to stop reading fringe websites.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    71. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not at all true that the point of how the US was set up is to allow you to fight without fear of losing everything you have. Not even a little true.

    72. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we really need outrage, e.g., to put bankers in jail for their crimes, the same busibodies are nowhere to be found

      F*ck the bankers. You're free to bank or not bank with whomever you wish. Hang the senators. They write laws you can't escape that take your freedom away and participate in back-room deals--some of which contain bankers.

    73. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have a childish, cartoonish view of conservatives. You should get out more; it's good for you.

      No, I believe that you do not know how childish and cartoonish the conservatives in SC are.

    74. Re:Put them to work by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      People were borrowing more money than they could afford to pay back. It's as simple as that. Nobody forced them to borrow more than they could afford. They were stupid.

      They may have been stupid, but the people who were actively encouraging them to borrow more than they could afford deserve some of the blame. When you fill out the paperwork and a banker tells you, "this looks good, you qualify," there's often an implicit assumption that the banker knows more about his business than you do -- or at least that other people are doing the same thing as you, and successfully. A banker who keeps encouraging more and more people to do the same thing when he knows -- or should know -- that most of them will probably default under the terms they've been given is, in my opinion, negligent if not criminally culpable.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    75. Re:Put them to work by Anrego · · Score: 1

      On the topic of history ... the greatest progress has been made during times of large numbers of people with little to lose. Someone above put it really well with the example of the Norman's of France.

      That said, I've accepted that I'm if not part of the problem, at least part of the idiot masses they'll write up in the history books. I'm honest about it. For every 1 person who makes a difference, there's like 1000 sheep behind them .. and I'm one of them. At least I know it!

      Also, I'm Canadian. Things haven't gotten that bleak up here yet.. and more importantly, if the great revolution everyone talks about ever happens.. it'll probably happen down here in the US first..

    76. Re:Put them to work by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      Of course they should. What do you think the school system is for exactly?

      No offense, I'm against this book ban and any other on a school wide scale, but parents should always have the last word on education (since they could after-all simply homeschool if they had the resources). There's no reason a public school system should have the right to dictate education without parental approval, unless you believe in something other than the freedoms America no longer stands for, of course.

      So you agree that parents should be able to use the courts to prevent schools from teaching evolution? Because some people think that not "approving" of lies like evolution is one of the freedoms America stands for.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    77. Re:Put them to work by geekoid · · Score: 1

      He didn't steal the money. IN fact, he didn't do anything illegal at all.; which is why regulation is needed so this type of stuff is illegal.
      He did something you're note "Suppose' to do.
      Add to it there was a certain amount of duress, as in one of the world most powerful men told him he would kill him if he didn't deliver. Since everything is known, I'm not sure what you expect from an investigation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    78. Re:Put them to work by Genda · · Score: 5, Interesting

      YOU ARE SLEEP WALKING and call it a life. You don't have to be a statistician to see the middle class is evaporating like a fragile mist on a summer morning... Those jobless hippies, used to be happily employed and have homes just like you. Then they sent their jobs to the third world. Destroyed their life savings by crashing the stock market. Gutted their retirement by turn entire states into economic wastelands call rust belts. Millions of people who did absolutely everything right, People who planned and saved and scrimped for their futures. Held diverse portfolios, and had property owned and paid for... got squashed like bugs. By the millions. You better believe they're pissed and ready to protest. Because they now live in vans and tent cities popping up outside of every major city in the country.

      Your hubris would offend me, if it weren't so clear that you're simply ignorant. Sadly, you're ignorant by choice, and what you don't know my friend, really can kill you.

    79. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence how stupid it is that many of the upper elite want to eliminate the safety nets that help keep those in the middle, lower-middle, and lower classes from falling into abject poverty. If you were to lose everything, you would be must less inhibited if you and a bunch of friends decide to get a guillotine and go huntin'.

    80. Re:Put them to work by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Orson Scott Card on how homophobic Orson Scott Card is:

      The hypocrites of homosexuality are, of course, already preparing to answer these statements by accusing me of homophobia, gay-bashing, bigotry, intolerance; but nothing that I have said here -- and nothing that has been said by any of the prophets or any of the Church leaders who have dealt with this issue -- can be construed as advocating, encouraging, or even allowing harsh personal treatment of individuals who are unable to resist the temptation to have sexual relations with persons of the same sex. On the contrary, the teachings of the Lord are clear in regard to the way we must deal with sinners. Christ treated them with compassion -- as long as they confessed that their sin was a sin. Only when they attempted to pretend that their sin was righteousness did he harshly name them for what they were: fools, hypocrites, sinners.

      Oh, so that clears that up, then. He's not.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    81. Re:Put them to work by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      sex negative parents

      Makes me wonder how they produced their precious little spawn in the first place. Perhaps in those parts the myth about the stork is true? I dunno, I don't live in the US so much of what goes on there makes no sense at all, but this would explain a lot....

    82. Re:Put them to work by SydShamino · · Score: 2

      Nothing in the Constitution says that each and every person must participate in their government. It merely prohibits the government from taking that right away from anyone (without due process). For every 50 people in 1789 writing a document to govern the land, there were thousands who just wanted to take care of their family and live the best life they can. That hasn't changed in the slightest.

      There are many personality types. Some of them would never be able to participate in the way you claim everyone who "belongs in a democratic society" must.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    83. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we sure showed them bankers when we sent Bradley Birkenfeld to jail

    84. Re:Put them to work by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, they shouldn't.

      And it has nothing to do with freedoms. That's an non sequitur to provoke an appeal to emotion; stop it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    85. Re:Put them to work by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      Nope, Speaker for the Dead...in fact it was the titular speaking in which he did it.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    86. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they should. What do you think the school system is for exactly?

      No offense, I'm against this book ban and any other on a school wide scale, but parents should always have the last word on education (since they could after-all simply homeschool if they had the resources). There's no reason a public school system should have the right to dictate education without parental approval, unless you believe in something other than the freedoms America no longer stands for, of course.

      So if your dad says his religion objects to math, you get to graduate from highschool without being able to do 2+2=4? I think not.

    87. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they should stop being childish cartoons.

      Conservative = FUCK YOU HIPPIE.

      Liberal = FUCK YOU SQUARE.

    88. Re:Put them to work by PRMan · · Score: 1

      That's what makes America great.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    89. Re:Put them to work by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I know we are on a serious topic here, but the image of my friends and I trying to "get a guillotine and go huntin'" cracked me up. I can picture it. Would be like that scene in office space when they try to launder the money. That is, absolutely nothing in my life as a middle class software developer has prepared me to take down a government.. I'd probably turn to wikipedia!

    90. Re:Put them to work by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Not approving evolution IS one of the freedoms America stands for. How about the prevention of the teaching of the science coming out of Creationism? You should be equally against that and let the kids look at the facts and make up their minds for themselves. Some of the Creationists' points blow large holes in the current thinking. So, it's not OK to block the popular teaching (even if it sometimes looks more like politics or storytelling), but it's OK to block unpopular science (even if it's clear that the scientific method was followed and the experiments are reproducible)?

      Someday, there will probably be major changes to origins science and we will be closer to the truth. But it will come from America, not countries that control what everyone is taught like Sweden.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    91. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about protesting that kind of thing, is you put yourself at risk. This is largely why I am part of that complacent mass. I have a job, a home, a bright looking future. I think there's lots of problems with the world that should be fixed, but I sure as hell am not going to risk losing what I have. The only people who can protest this stuff are people who don't have much to begin with, and they just get shrugged off as "jobless hippies". It's actually a suspiciously well engineered little system.

      Calling up the school in a huff because the cafeteria serves junk food on the other hand.. very low risk for the bored stay at home mom..

      Soon your complacency will be the thing drawing your job, home, bright future into risk. Wonder what you'll do then.

    92. Re:Put them to work by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Fireflight

      Great band, BTW.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    93. Re:Put them to work by mk1004 · · Score: 1

      When I bought my house back in the late '80s, one of the first things the real estate agent did was do a quick income/debt check to see how much we could afford. The loan people also checked.

      These people are probably, from a legal standpoint, considered experts in their field. They told the buyers they could afford those houses. Of course, they didn't care because they were so far removed from the consequences of defaults, they didn't really care. They were being pushed by the bankers to sell as much as possible, so the sales growth and therefore stock price would keep going up. So yes, the buyers were stupid, but those bankers/real estate agents/mortgage brokers made Forrest Gump look like Einstein by comparison. Plenty of blame to go around.

      --
      I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
    94. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a coward, I just have to say, "yes"

    95. Re:Put them to work by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I'm outraged. When I was 14 I was forced to read a book with explicit references to interracial sex by my English teacher. The sentence

      An old black ram is tupping your white ewe

      has stuck in my mind for no particular reason. Nobody get fired for reading Shakespeare to kids no matter how explicit it is.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    96. Re:Put them to work by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      put bankers in jail for their crimes,
      Don't forget the homeowners who took out the loans they couldn't afford, and the politicians who required the bankers to lend to people who couldn't afford the loans.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    97. Re:Put them to work by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Instead, what this school board did is told all their teachers "you're going to get fired for teaching anything that goes against the arbitrary capricious whims of any nutcake parent."
      You forgot "...even though we as a school board approved this literature for you to teach." Which is almost certainly the case.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    98. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may well have responded to the allegation that he is a homophobe but that doesn't mean he isn't one.

      In the original article that that made me stop buying his books some of the "non-homophobe" comments were;

      "Within the Church, the young person who experiments with homosexual behavior should be counseled with, not excommunicated"
      "The Church has plenty of room for individuals who are struggling to overcome their temptation toward homosexual behavior."
      "If the Church has no the authority to tell its members that they may not engage in homosexual practices, then it has no authority at all. And if we accept the argument of the hypocrites of homosexuality that their sin is not a sin, we have destroyed ourselves. "

      http://www.nauvoo.com/library/card-hypocrites.html

    99. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two word solution...

      Soylent Green.

    100. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...as opposed to feeding them everything the state wants them to believe, thereby eliminating differences in thought.

      I'd rather have a system with a few misguided nimrods than one where the state provides everything and has people depend on it thereby. Nice concept of freedom there.

    101. Re:Put them to work by stanjo74 · · Score: 1

      First they came for the communists,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
      Then they came for the trade unionists,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
      Then they came for the Jews,
      and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
      Then they came for me
      and there was no one left to speak out for me.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came%E2%80%A6

    102. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to paint conservatives with a broad brush, you small-minded liberal bigot. As a conservative parent, and someone who is friends with conservative parents, I can tell you that we have no problem teaching our children about sex, or the difference between girls and boys. And we do not equate age-appropriate sex education with an "interracial, midget, anal gang-bang."

      What we do have a problem with is: 1. Someone who doesn't know our children as well as we do, deciding when to introduce sexual topics into the curriculum and not telling us beforehand. and 2. Someone teaching our children about sex in a way that states, implicitly or explicitly, that sexuality is disconnected from morality.

      I know that you enlightened liberals like to leave your kids' moral and emotional education up to the Authorities, but conservative parents are more hands-on than that. We prefer to have a say in when sexuality is introduced to our children, and we prefer to teach them that your heart is, indeed, connected to your hips. But I suppose that makes us un-enlightened in your eyes.

    103. Re:Put them to work by greenbird · · Score: 1

      There's no reason a public school system should have the right to dictate education without parental approval, unless you believe in something other than the freedoms America no longer stands for, of course.

      So it's ok for parents to dictate what's taught except where it's something you don't like ("freedoms America no longer stands")? You realize that many believe this is a christian nation and therefore that should be taught in school.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    104. Re:Put them to work by PraiseBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then, frankly, you don't belong in a democratic society.

      Let me get this straight... You think he doesn't deserve to be in this society because he isn't willing to give up his house, family, career and future, to protect the rights of kids to read a particular book in class. (They aren't even his kids)

      I don't like censorship either, but there is a reason that revolutions are started by the young. If this book got banned nationwide because of these dumb complaints, are you willing to go to jail over it? If speech alone isn't enough, are you willing to kill to keep this book uncensored? I know you aren't talking about violence and don't mean to imply that. I'm just bringing it up for examples of how far people are willing to go to protect something.

      It is impossible for a person to fight every injustice on the planet. Most people settle for the things that matter to them the most, like their own family and kids and house.

    105. Re:Put them to work by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I found that mentioned a few links deep.. there was a line that explicitly said the kid took it home and showed his mother. But I can't find it now.. so either it was removed, or I imagined the whole thing.

    106. Re:Put them to work by Genda · · Score: 1

      This is the very thing that's most important. We need to address our complacency, our resignation, despair and apathy. It is the internal dialogue that "I make no difference" and "I don't want to pay the price of being responsible for the future" that greases the road to a dark destinations. That yields the civilizing intent of men with vision and compassion to self obsessed despots who can only succeed when the many abdicate their say in the future.

      Why would you volunteer to be a bleating herd animal waiting first to be sheered then rendered down to mutton? No matter how comfortable you are currently, dark orifices are a lousy place to plant your head. Perhaps its time to take inventory of your ethical stock?

    107. Re:Put them to work by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

      I'm against this book ban and any other on a school wide scale, but parents should always have the last word on education (since they could after-all simply homeschool if they had the resources).

      Let's do a bit of reductio ad absurdum on this theorem. Parents should always have the last word in their children's feeding (since they could after all simply feed the child at home if they had the resources). Does this mean the parents should be allowed to starve their kids, or feed them rat poison if they consider it the right thing? Obviously not: the child also has rights which put limits on the parents' choices, so parents aren't allowed to feed the kid poison.

      The same reasoning applies to education: parents should definitely NOT have the last word on the education of their children; most parents aren't qualified to decide, and decisions made by an ignorant or bigoted parent can have a serious impact on the child's future; they can reduce the kid's ability to choose for himself once he becomes capable of choice, and can significantly reduce his chances in life. Children should get as good an education as possible, and most parents don't have enough specific knowledge to understand what's a "good" education and what not. Those people shouldn't be allowed to interfere - especially in a case as the one above, where a zealot nutjob limits not only her child's access to some information, but also the access of all his classmates.

    108. Re:Put them to work by bragr · · Score: 1

      >>Way to paint conservatives with a broad brush, you small-minded liberal bigot
      1) Way to assume I am am a liberal. I am, in fact, very far to the right (though I a very different right than the religious right).

      >>As a conservative parent, and someone who is friends with conservative parents, I can tell you that we have no problem teaching our children about sex, or the difference between girls and boys.
      2) conservative, sex negative parents != conservative parents

    109. Re:Put them to work by bragr · · Score: 1

      conservative, sex negative parents != conservative parents

    110. Re:Put them to work by jd · · Score: 1

      Just as the Free Software Foundation carries papers that demonstrate that rewards alter behaviour to get those rewards (which is not the same thing as altering behaviour so as to be productive or meritous), one can argue that deterrents do NOT deter crime, they deter people getting CAUGHT at crime. In other words, they produce more skillful criminals, they do not produce better citizens.

      What is needed is for there to be a focus on how to get people to be better citizens. You cannot do that through rewards, you cannot do that through deterrents, what isn't known is what you CAN do that through.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    111. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but in the minds of conservative, sex negative parents (or non parents for that matter), acknowledging that sex exists, or even that there are differences between "boy parts" and "girl parts" is basically the same thing as showing the kids a full length interracial, midget, anal gang-bang.

      fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap.....

    112. Re:Put them to work by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Your post is wrong top to bottom. There has been testimony in many courts regarding the literally hundreds of thousands of felonies that were committed by all levels of the financial industry, including in the boardrooms of the TBTF banks. None of the schemes were new, they were basically the same things that happened during the S&L crisis, just on a much bigger scale. The difference is that back then people actually got prosecuted and went to jail. Now we just pretend it was an accident.

      You can blow bankers all day long, but you really have no idea what you're talking about.

    113. Re:Put them to work by lgw · · Score: 1

      You mean a salesman lied? I never would have seen that coming!

      Seriously, I hear this a lot. As if the guy trying to sell you a mortgage was somehow going to be more honest than the guy trying to sell you a used car. Why would anyone think that? A banker has no duty at all to consider what's best for you when selling you a mortage. He's a salesman, like any other, out to rip you off for his commission.

      Now, there were some criminal bankers: those who actually lied about the contract terms to the borrower, or defrauded the system by forging borrower qualificaitons. And thousands of those assholes have escaped justice, and need to be in jail. But the guy who says "this looks good, you qualify" - that's guy is just being a saleman like any other.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    114. Re:Put them to work by jd · · Score: 1

      I was reading independently by age 4, speed-reading by age 5. ("Speed-reading" for a 5 year old means reading a Famous Five novel cover-to-cover in a lunch break without skipping anything.)

      Assigned books? I was banned from the school library after I'd read through 75% of it in the first two terms. I didn't wait for anyone to assign me things to read, I read them and to hell with it. I'd finished the local public library's kid's section within the next couple of years, their sci-fi section the year after and had ploughed through virtually every other section there before I'd taken my 11+. The librarians were in a panic when I'd discovered the microfiche.

      Looking back on it, I can see I was working at a fraction of the pace I could have been. Assuming relative demonstrated abilities remain the same, then if I was at potential then AVERAGE kids should have been capable of doing what I was actually managing.

      So, no, I don't regard this as being about what is or is not "allowed", since motivated kids WILL do what they damn well want. This is about the kids not being motivated in the first place. That, to me, is the real crime. The rest is an excuse to avoid asking why.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    115. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At least at the end of your life you'll be able to look back and say "I've never risked anything". Good for you."

      Or may it be the case that will be his loved ones that will say "He never risked our safety or welfare. God bless him".

    116. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they all spell ensure incorrectly.

    117. Re:Put them to work by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "But for someone to summarize what happened, and not include the most blatant obvious fact that people were borrowing more money than they could ever pay back"

      What is blatantly obvious is that no matter how pervasively I ask for money I can't borrow a dime if there's nobody wanting to lend it to me. If I go to the street crying our loud that I'll lend money to anyone that want it without asking for due guarantees on the other hand...

      Oh, and who is the one that wrote the contracts and has the high payed risk analysts with enough data about the other side as to know even his favourite tooth paste brand? The borrower?

    118. Re:Put them to work by bane2571 · · Score: 1

      What's rediculous is that the parent is claiming that a non-sexualised description of a 6 (I think?) year old showering is pornography. Really makes you doubt that parent's thought process. In fact I think the worst that happens in the entire book sex wise is a kiss. Hell, my highschool library stocked the clan of the cavebear books. That is some enlightening reading for a 13 year old.

    119. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to address our complacency, our resignation, despair and apathy.

      That's all very poetic.. but If history has shown us anything, it's that things of this scale don't really change until things get really bad for an extended period of time. In my opinion, we are past the point where protests and angry letters are going to fix anything but are not at the point where we storm government offices with pitchforks and torches.

      Look at what's going on in the middle east. And it took nearly half a millenium of things being really bad.

      When enough of us lose everything we've got and join in.. then maybe we'll change something. Right now, the only thing to be gained is an opportunity to be smug.

    120. Re:Put them to work by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      As a conservative I have to say I don't have sex. I do like to fuck though.

    121. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you would like to go correct these conspiracy-minded idiots then?

    122. Re:Put them to work by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Aside from the recent issues of outside influence (sadly from my own country), Sweden, Norway, Finland, et. al. are sounding nicer and nicer. They seem to be the last bastions of independence and sanity in the world.

    123. Re:Put them to work by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Hell, my highschool library stocked the clan of the cavebear books. That is some enlightening reading for a 13 year old.

      To say the least. Rape was not exactly a concept back then.

    124. Re:Put them to work by erictheturtle · · Score: 1

      Nudity == nudity not porn. It is our natural state and nothing to be ashamed of.

      If you're going to bring up what's natural, it's also natural to be ashamed of being naked.

    125. Re:Put them to work by lennier · · Score: 1

      the subject of children comes up.... as soon as I saw that scene I thought, "Holy shit! That's how society works. That's what the status quo holds over people's heads."

      No, that's what life holds over people's heads.

      The genetic imperative of carbon-based organisms to reproduce is not actually an invention of the marketing department of the Coca-Cola company. And having a family isn't some dark conspiracy to uphold the "social status quo" any more than constantly needing to breathe is.

      The reality is that people tend to enjoy social stability because civil wars and revolutionary social upheavals are actually full of hurt and breakage and often don't change all that much in the long run.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    126. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I will make sure not to move to Sweden. Here in the USA, home-schooled kids generally score much higher academically than public school kids. Why? Although I am sure that no one will admit this, the primary goal of public schools here is not to educate kids but to program them to conform to society's politically correct standards and to become obedient wage slaves and economic widgets that ultimately add to the wealth and power of the rich power-brokers who actually run things while pretending that the public vote somehow matters. I am sure that the US will soon catch up with Sweden in propaganda techniques however.

    127. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, a post that generalizes the perspective of conservatives by lumping them all in with a minority extremest view is modded insightful?

      Stay classy modders.

    128. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term "homophobe" is ill-defined. That's what makes it such a great rhetorical weapon. It conjures up images of "fear" or "hate" due to the "phobe" suffix, but it can be used to label anything short of full support of a pro-homosexual agenda.

    129. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that can necessitate more skillful criminals will, as a necessary response, reduce crime. For one, skill takes time to develop. For two, increased skill is hard to develop and not everybody can. There's a few reasons everybody isn't a top flight surgeon, making top flight surgeon's pay. If everybody was a skilled criminal, we'd all know what things not to do so as to not be victimized. We can't all be skilled crims, so we're all to varying degrees vulnerable. Raising the bar on minimal criminal efficiency means fewer of us can successfully be skillful criminals. And the easiest way for a corporate criminal to get caught .. is to crash the economy. A more skillful one wouldn't.

    130. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So glad to hear that "mental freedom" includes believing whatever the God^H^H^HState tells them to believe. Moral judgement included by deeming any non-conforming belief as "inappropriate!"

    131. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it quite interesting to note that I was offended at reading your response. even though it is spot on. As offensive it is to me to tell some one that they don't have a place in a democratic society, because they have a different opinion on the subject, it can still be correct. Early on in the history of our country an election was disputed. A man had been assaulted and his brother killed by people that wanted to ensure their candidate won, which he did, as they managed to kill or intimidate enough of the opposition. The part of it I found most interesting is that the judge did not even question the events when he ruled that the election results would stand. What the judge noted in his statement was that 'Any many of reasonable bravery would not hesitate to face such adversity to let his voice be heard.' And that such adversity would not significantly impact the results. It seems that 'average bravery' has rather declined over the years, resulting in bullies being free to take more and more.

    132. Re:Put them to work by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      On the whole I thought securityemo constructed a well thought out paragraph for someone who probably didn't have English as a first language (they refer to being from Sweden). There are plenty of people for whom English is their first language who can't tell the difference between ensure/insure, affect/effect, etc...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    133. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Damn. So in order to protect every's freedom you must restrict everyone's freedom. For the greater good, of course. And by the sound of it you don't even seem to notice you've been swindelled. So proud to be an American right now I can't even begin to tell you.

    134. Re:Put them to work by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Teaching fantasy in the classroom will not lead to a broadened understanding of the real world. Not even by anology.

      If you want to be closer to the truth, try starting with facts.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    135. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --The only people who can protest this stuff are people who don't have much to begin with, and they just get shrugged off as "jobless hippies".--

      My seven year old daughter got 3 days suspension for a 2 second altercation... The problem is too much authority and not enough leniency.

      I was in a much more severe school fight around the same age. I got a lecture from the principal and a call to my parents. That was my single school reprisal... other than that, honor student, lettered athlete, quiz team, model UN, other clubs, blah blah blah, scholarships to a very good college.

      Things are out of hand-- and totally at the school admin level.

      I hear that by the time my kids get to high school, they'll be wearing student IDs around their necks like dogs and have armed officers in the school arresting them instead of having administrative intervention.

      In my high school, literally, it was custom for the seniors, late in their last year, to occasionally burst into a classroom with authentic looking replica water pistols (uzis in the late 1980s) and shoot up teachers... with absolutely no repercussion and a good laugh all around. Today, you'd probably go to prison for that... and for no good reason. There have been random, extremely rare actual school massacres for at least a hundred years. Almost always, kids are harmlessly kids, just like people are usually harmlessly people. Fear and control serves only the authoritarian oppressors.

    136. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My radical-ish leftist sociology professor taught us that in 1989, and it's rung in my head ever since. So it's not unknown at all, happily. If doing radical things hurts your livelihood and ability to provide for your family, or even endangers them, you're less likely to do it. And don't get her started on pro-natalism...

      Interestingly, I'm still childless and unmarried. Maybe that lesson has haunted my life choices. Or maybe I'm ugly.

    137. Re:Put them to work by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Stop the FUD about OSC being a homophobe -- he's responded many times to this allegation and there's no proof of it except in conspiracy-minded idiots' rantings.

      I have no preconception one way or the other about OSC; I very seldom read fiction, and came into this discussion with no knowledge of OSC's personal background. If OSC isn't a homophobe, perhaps someone should add some refutations to his Wikipedia entry:

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Orson_Scott_Card#Homosexuality

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    138. Re:Put them to work by tftp · · Score: 1

      I have been raising hell about getting critical problems fixed for 20 years or so, occasionally WINNING those fights, and guess what? There have been NO destructive consequences to my life. None. Zero.

      Perhaps you are winning fights, but you have lost the war. I do not blame Anrego for his lack of desire to swim in molasses. The country's problems are rooted in democracy - however paradoxical it may sound. Democracy doesn't guarantee good decisions; it only guarantees that decisions, good or bad, are made by the majority. If you have smart voters then you have smart decisions; if the voters are idiots then the decisions will be idiotic. Today the majority of voters will gladly vote against their own interests - and they do. There are of course tricks that help them make the necessary vote. Inconvenient candidates are villified or set up; only those remain who are equally acceptable and equally ready to sell the country.

      Go whimper in your little corner, terrified of any word or act that might challenge the absolute dominance of your Rightful Lords And Masters.

      A captured animal may throw itself against the bars of the cage, but it is rarely a productive strategy. It only tells the capturer which animal is dangerous and should be destroyed. A wise animal would ascertain the situation, wait for an opportune moment (or, even better, would create it), and only then it tries to run away.

      In other words, OWS and other anarchists who burn cars and break store windows during WTO meetings are not helping. They aren't helping themselves, and they aren't helping anyone else. They only make themselves into convenient targets. They throw themselves at the bars while their Lords and Masters are laughing from safety of their offices: their beloved enemy, Emmanuel Goldstein, finally decided to show up!

    139. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nanny state, FTW!

    140. Re:Put them to work by tftp · · Score: 1

      If you're going to bring up what's natural, it's also natural to be ashamed of being naked.

      People started wearing clothes to protect themselves from cold, as they migrated from equatorial regions of Earth into colder ones. Some of modern equatorial indian tribes do not bother with clothes. You do not need them, technically, if the climate is warm enough; clothes then only consume money to be purchased, repaired, cleaned.

    141. Re:Put them to work by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Nudity == nudity not porn. It is our natural state and nothing to be ashamed of.

      If you're going to bring up what's natural, it's also natural to be ashamed of being naked.

      Actually it's a learned response to be ashamed of being naked and often takes quite a bit of conditioning to create that shame though it is usually done at an early enough age that as adults we forget about it.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    142. Re:Put them to work by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand porn very well.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    143. Re:Put them to work by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      reading from Harry Potter will probably get you lynched because of lack of a good solid Christian story line

      Wait, what? The climax of the series is Harry willingly and knowingly going to his own death to save his friends and the world. How much more Christian can you get?

      Oh, you mean 'American nutjob'? Sorry, that's not the same thing.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    144. Re:Put them to work by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Paragraph 1 reminded me of http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki/Bart_Stops_to_Smell_the_Roosevelts, a Simpsons episode where Superintendent Chalmers gets through to Bart by teaching him about guy stuff

      I've heard that conspiracy before.

      Also, I'm front Rochester NY and one of the recent local news stories had to do with a student catching hell for a critical essay; here's one link about that: http://www.fdfny.org/blog/2012/02/27/breaking-news-13-year-old-jada-williams-persecuted-by-the-rochester-city-school-district/

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    145. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me: FUCK YOU BOTH

    146. Re:Put them to work by joeme1 · · Score: 1

      Please don't place such a condescending stereotype on conservatives. I believe myself to be quite conservative, but I've read Ender's Game and Ender's Shadow (I will finish the rest as I have the opportunity). A colleague of mine at a small midwestern middle school assigned Ender's Game to his students and they read it together in class. He also taught Sunday School at a small conservative church. He received no backlash from parents.
          And to say that conservative literature and ideas are embraced by those who are "less intelligent" is intolerant and hateful. (See what I did there? Those are "Liberal" attack words.)
          Even though I am a conservative parent and teacher, I can't wait until my children and students are capable of thinking for themselves. As a teacher, I don't see success in test scores, I see it in students' abilities to synthesize information, to discern good information from crap, and to be able to reason through new and challenging situations on their own. But I do occasionally encounter parents who fear a child who can out-think them, or succeed where they failed. It is unfortunate, but it isn't restricted to conservatives. There are people with very liberal ideologies who fail to see the benefits of proper education.

    147. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is no longer correct. Parents or guardians can request that the children NOT be taught sex-ed and the school can NOT refuse. Muslims in Sweden do this all the time.

    148. Re:Put them to work by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      They were not stupid but blindfolded by the bankers. It was the bankers who have accepted to sign these contracts with these poor fools. But the banks didn't feared anything. And they were right. Now it's you who pay for their errors thanks for the government bailout. The banks won a lot of money in the process and it seems that they are doing it all over again with students loans...

    149. Re:Put them to work by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      harsh personal treatment of individuals [...] Christ treated them with compassion -- as long as they confessed that their sin was a sin.

      Oh, so that clears that up, then. He's not.

      Yeah, all he says is that as long as gay people accept that God created them as abominations, they can continue to exist in the abominable state and not be totally nuked off the face of the planet collectively. Totally not homophobia.

    150. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my high-school English class, I managed to convince our teacher to include "Stranger in a Strange Land". Not a peep from any parents, administrators, etc., despite Jubal Harshaw's harem, the Fosterite cult, the cannibalistic Martian "communion", and finally Smith's enthusiastically pansexual "Church of All Worlds". (Imagine the movie version...)

      But this was the 1970s, we were 15-16, and in Canada. I pity these American teens.

    151. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...as showing the kids a full length interracial, midget, anal gang-bang.

      Intriguing... Now where we would find this full length movie of which you speak?

    152. Re:Put them to work by snobody · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure taking money from segregated accounts is, in fact, extremely illegal.

    153. Re:Put them to work by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      As someone else pointed out, choosing not to believe in anything is protected thought and belief in the USA, or so it was back when it was a greater nation than today.

      You ignored my comment about being against any type of book banning, and used a strawman to claim I supported court orders against schools. What I said was that parents should be the final arbiters of what their children are taught because the state ought to have no right to impose much beyond standards of minimum education on children.

      To think otherwise is to support yet another benefit to the rich who can afford private schooling, or the class of workers who can afford or arrange to homeschool their children, both of which eliminate putting up with the public school system anyway. The public school system only exists for those children whose parents can't afford either of the other options, and shouldn't throw its weight around without realizing it wouldn't exist at all in its present state if many of them had the choice.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    154. Re:Put them to work by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      When did truth become the primary arbiter of what's taught in classrooms?

      Also, since a large number of Americans believe in Creation, not teaching it in school is akin to not teaching students about the dangers of electricity. Ignoring reality doesn't make it go away.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    155. Re:Put them to work by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Outrage is getting mad at things that have already happened, it isn't productive method of try to make sure it doesn't happen.

      Somebody kick this moron in the balls and repeat that line at him.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    156. Re:Put them to work by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Try his own rebuttal here: http://www.hatrack.com/osc_responds_halmets_father.html

      YMMV.

      PS I don't consider people who think homosexuality is wrong on religious basis to be homophobic, and the word doesn't mean that either. I think cheating is wrong by way of example, but I'm still friends with and don't give people a hard time for being cheaters. He does not appear to have a fear of or hatred for homosexuals, he simply disagrees with their sexual preference. There's a difference that many try to ignore.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    157. Re:Put them to work by TrogL · · Score: 1

      I used to teach in the Junior High system. I was also raised in an authoritarian household. Authoritarians create a virtual reality, surrounding themselves with like-minded people, listening only to media that agrees with their mindset (eg. Fox News) and attending churches whose preaching reinforces this. I call it the "bubble" or the "box". Under no circumstances do they want anything to intrude into their system, hence their constant preoccupation with the school curriculum - little Johnny might hear something that would allow him to actually think and break the bubble.

    158. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Securityemo, that would be unthinkable there. That's because they require all schools to teach the exact same stuff to everybody, no matter how different people are. It reminds me of the planet they went to in A Wrinkle In Time, everybody out practicing basketball at the same time, in lockstep, etc. The difference was that was a book, so that's the way it went. But the government forcing lockstep forces real people to rebel, like Breivik in your neighboring country.
      I've reworded your statement to say what it said, but in slightly different words:
      "Every school is required to have the same educational standards in order to force everyone (in theory) to get the same education, even when inappropriate, and not be allowed access to any but approved information. Homeschooling is forbidden. So for example, a deeply X parent could not (legally) allow their child to know of non-governmentally-sanctioned views on contraception, religion, or in any other way allow their mental freedom completely." [I changed your word from 'religious' to 'X', because it's not just religious intolerance in Sweden, but economic, political, etc.]
      Remember, sometimes tolerance is wrong: even in Norway they did not want Breivik killing others, though to be that way is to be intolerant (and rightfully so).
      Think about it -- oh, wait, that's not (legally) sanctioned. Sweden isn't the first country to go this way, and it won't be the last, but it always results in the downfall of a country.

    159. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE SLEEP WALKING and call it a life.

      I'd make it more like DEAD and calling it a life.

      The United States of America was founded by people who knew that if they didn't succeed in their attempt to cast off the governance of his Majesty, George III, by grace of GOD, king of England and her colonies, that they would be arrested for treason, branded with hot irons, whipped, mutilated, humiliated, and publicly hanged.

      We, on the other hand, are afraid to get on an airplane and travel 500 miles without allowing ourselves to be stripped naked. We brag about our vaunted right to bear arms and how we'll fight to the death to keep "Odumbo" from taking away our AK-47s, but you won't catch us carrying them onboard. Not that a whole house full of automatic weapons means squat against a well-regulated militia that can afford tactical nukes, but still...

      It has been said that all that Evil needs to succeed is for Good to do nothing. Maybe so. If you can't even whine about the swirling noises, don't expect sympathy when the big flush comes at the end of it.

    160. Re:Put them to work by anyGould · · Score: 1

      (a.k.a. the “volleyball is exclusionary and tag promotes violence” types).

      I've heard the tag=violence bit before (I volunteered at a school that banned any sport where you threw a ball at a kid. No baseball, soccer-baseball, dodgeball...), but I've never heard the volleyball is exclusionary line before. What's the (poor) logic there?

    161. Re:Put them to work by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      What I said was that parents should be the final arbiters of what their children are taught because the state ought to have no right to impose much beyond standards of minimum education on children.

      And how does that work, exactly? One teacher, 30 kids, 30 different sets of parental beliefs about what should and should not be taught. If the parents are that concerned, they can home school. Can't afford homeschooling? Then I guess they want to use the publicly funded, thus publicly directed resources. If they don't like the publicly directed curriculum, they are free to run for the local school board and influence public policy. Just like everyone else.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    162. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything except "Destroyed their life savings by crashing the stock market". Someone forgot to tell people not to sell their stock when it crashes, but to hold on and ride it out.

      1) Stock drops
      2) Uneducated people sell stock low
      3) Stock prices drop further because of selling
      4) My 401K gets lots of stock at cheap prices
      5) Stock rebounds
      6) My 401k skyrockets.

      My 401k has been averaging a hair over 10% growth/year for the past 4 years with ~3/4 of the growth in the past 2 years. This crash has served me well. Well spread investments, ftw.

    163. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are being technical, it's a federal republic. Not sure what difference that makes but technical is technical.

    164. Re:Put them to work by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      While I can't comment on Sweden specifically, the sort of paranoid, blinkered thinking in the parent is at least part of the reason why state-funded schools in little countries like Finland are kicking the crap out of their USA counterparts. One alternative is to, y'know, make the schools actually *good*:

      http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/12/what-americans-keep-ignoring-about-finlands-school-success/250564/

      http://www.smithsonianmag.com/people-places/Why-Are-Finlands-Schools-Successful.html

      http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/january/finnish-schools-reform-012012.html

      etc.

    165. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "restrict[ing] their mental freedom" is not solved by uniformity in education standards and denying people the choice to pick material themselves. It just creates a different set of restrictions. To see this in any country with significant state involvement in education of children, simply look at the subset of possible things that are and are not taught. And more tellingly, look at the things that are not just passed over(which is understandable, given the small amount of material that they are able to covered) but actively avoided. Replacing religious indoctrination with another form of indoctrination is not a valid solution at all, if the end sought is indeed mental freedom.

      In short, educational equality does not imply mental freedom.

    166. Re:Put them to work by CmdTako · · Score: 1

      "Your friend the baker was right," said my colleague. "The dictatorship, and the whole process of its coming into being, was above all diverting. It provided an excuse not to think for people who did not want to think anyway. I do not speak of your ‘little men,’ your baker and so on; I speak of my colleagues and myself, learned men, mind you. Most of us did not want to think about fundamental things and never had. There was no need to. Nazism gave us some dreadful, fundamental things to think about—we were decent people—and kept us so busy with continuous changes and ‘crises’ and so fascinated, yes, fascinated, by the machinations of the ‘national enemies,’ without and within, that we had no time to think about these dreadful things that were growing, little by little, all around us. Unconsciously, I suppose, we were grateful. Who wants to think?

    167. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom is a word not usually used or heard around these here parts.

    168. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are reasons for posting anonymously other than fear, ya know?

      Also, protecting yourself from unnecessary risk is hardly a bad decision. The problem is when people refuse to take a risk for something they value more than security. That is the definition of cowardice.

      Not GP btw.

    169. Re:Put them to work by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you mean the founding fathers made a democratic society, unless you were jew, "indian", "nigger", or woman, etc. get real, we've never had anything of the sort nor do we now. in fact, we are currently building a police state and your protests, votes, activism won't change a damn thing.

    170. Re:Put them to work by geoskd · · Score: 1

      I have a job, a home, a bright looking future. I think there's lots of problems with the world that should be fixed, but I sure as hell am not going to risk losing what I have.

      Then, frankly, you don't belong in a democratic society. The whole point of our society and especially how the U.S. was set up to begin with was so that anyone in the populous could fight for what they believe is right without the fear of losing everything they have for speaking up. I am beginning to think that complacency isn't the real problem here, cowardice is. When did America get castrated by the corporations and the bullies? It's a sad day in a democracy when the people are afraid to say something is right or wrong because they are afraid to lose everything.

      No, Actually the failing there is Democracy. It may be the best we've got, but its a far cry from good. Democracy fails the same way everything else political fails; No one gets involved unless it is in their best interest to do so, and the only time it is in someones *individual* best interest to get involved is when the system is screwing them personally, or they are using the system to screw someone else.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    171. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn == actors aping sex

      Sex itself is supposed to be a deep and intimate thing. You wouldn't get that idea watching porn, however.

    172. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like there is no way in Sweden to have views different from the government of the day. Who determines "appropriate" or "inappropriate" views? Is there any way of challenging these dictates?

    173. Re:Put them to work by Genda · · Score: 1

      I saw an old interview of George Carlin, and he said America today pretends to give its citizens choice. In fact we have no choice in the important issues and we perpetuate the illusion of choice with countless meaningless choices to keep the common man busy. Paper or Plastic? Smoking or non? Do you want fries with that? This is not free choice and it hasn't been for quite a while.

    174. Re:Put them to work by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I mean school is so screwed up that when we read the Canterbury Tales, the cool tales were the ones that could not be assigned.

      Well, once you understand what words like "quaint" in the Tales really mean, the tame stuff like the Wife of Bath's prologue gives way to the large amount of material that would easily be rated R were it made into a movie.... The truth is that most of the classics, if translated literally with the inclusion of innuendo present when written, would be unacceptable to many parents. That's why we've got "modernized" versions of these classics that "update" the language to something that not only removes all the original writing skill and style, but robs the text of all but the most superficial meaning.

      I mean... Gawain and the Green Knight? Grimm's tales? Morte d'Artur? King James' Bible?

      Literature is mostly about sex and death (or the social consequences of these). If you remove the sex, you get a very slanted perspective on life.

    175. Re:Put them to work by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Indeed.
      He's obviously against acceptance of same-sex sex.
      In this quote he also appears as homophobic as he appears to be phlatuphobic (and no, I'm not comparing being gay to flatus).
      Dislike for someone's behaviour (even if it is based on a natural drive) is not the same as being afraid of that person because of what they are or do -- which appears to be exactly what he's saying in that quote when you take out all the talk about sin, whether you agree or disagree with the position behind what he says.

      Believe it or not, it's possible to believe and state that what someone does is wrong without being afraid of them. There are more than enough truly homophobic people in the world without attempting to dilute the term. I'm pretty sure Card is also against M-F sex outside of marriage. This doesn't make him afraid of 80% of the general public though, does it?

    176. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly
      I have read all of the Ender's Series and have never seen one erotic passage let alone any that could be called pornographic.
      Yes there is a few scenes where characters are nude, like in a shower.
      Is middle America that Screwed up that they think nudity is pornography.
      NEWSFLASH! We were born NAKED.
      I am glad I live in Australia, the UNITED States of America is going Nuts!
      Idiotic Politics
      Idiotic foreign Policy
      Idiotic Domestic Policy
      Idiotic People like this parent and school admin. killing what little freedom your Former Mighty Country stood for.

    177. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the teachers allowed unfettered literacy, heaven forbid, kids may learn that the screwed-up world view of the American powerbrokers is flawed.
      Sounds almost like a return to the bad days of book burnings by dictatorships as a means of controlling the people.
       

    178. Re:Put them to work by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      There are more than enough truly homophobic people in the world without attempting to dilute the term. I'm pretty sure Card is also against M-F sex outside of marriage. This doesn't make him afraid of 80% of the general public though, does it?

      I think you're redefining the term "homophobia" to mean "afraid of gays," which is usually what homophobic people do so they can reassure themselves and reaffirm their own beliefs. As in: "I'm not lashing out at gay people, it's really the gays who are attacking me, my beliefs, and my way of life, by virtue of the very fact that they exist, but even though they keep attacking me, I'm not afraid of them, therefore I'm not homophobic. QED."

      Be that as it may, if you're asking whether Orson Scott Card has as much disgust and contempt for 80 percent of the general public as he has for gays, I really couldn't say, not knowing the man. I haven't read his beliefs on the subject. But if he believes as you say he does, then I guess so.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    179. Re:Put them to work by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      What I said was that parents should be the final arbiters of what their children are taught because the state ought to have no right to impose much beyond standards of minimum education on children.

      Yes, I know you said that but you seem to be contradicting yourself. You claim to believe in "minimum standards of education" and yet you also feel that parents should be able to tell schools what they can and cannot teach. That is contradictory. Being a parent doesn't make you any less ignorant, bigoted, or stupid than anyone else. It doesn't qualify you to be an educator. And it certainly doesn't qualify you to tell an entire school full of educators -- or an entire school district or an entire state, for that matter -- what your kids should learn. If you want to control that, then by all means, home school your kids. Or pull them out of public school and put them in a private school that teaches your beliefs. Either way, though, you are going to pick up the tab for that. My tax dollars go to my state schools, which teach a minimum standard of education and hopefully much further than that.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    180. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well here's words from another guy posting anonymously(but not really when the people who matter are involved). Our culture and civilization is a complex system, complex systems are innately, complex, but generally follow a polarized pattern that shifts back and forth(not literally with only two positions, but that's how we try to paint it nowadays). Get used to it. That doesn't mean give up, that doesn't mean fuck everything but me and my family, it just means when attempting to enact change or bring something to people's awareness, you take the mechanisms of that complex system into account. Point and case: What on Earth would a violent revolution of the people in the spirit of Syria or the shit going on in Egypt right now accomplish except the destruction of infrastructure and resources, the creation of scapegoats, and the slaughter of god knows how many people who are simply nothing more than little pegs in a machine trying to find food for themselves and those they love, just like you. Think bigger, think safer, think logically.

    181. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That'd be unthinkable here in sweden."

      Wait, so you show the full length interracial, midget, anal gang-bang?

    182. Re:Put them to work by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      My high school library had the Chronicles of the Unbeliever by Stephen Donaldson in it. At the risk of spoilering for anyone who hasn't read it the central charcter rapes the first person he meets in the new world. The repercussions of that haunt him all the way through the series and nearly destroy any chance he has of saving that world. It was a very powerful subtext that there are some acts do damage far beyond the act itself and cannot be forgiven.
      I don't expect any school library has those books in anymore. Someone will have complained and another lesson will be lost because they couldn't face the fact that their little darling is entering the dangerous world of adulthood. Which of course means that when they do they are woefully unprepared and get hurt even worse.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    183. Re:Put them to work by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      "reading their own books" - nobody wants to see 35 copies of Twilight staring back at them...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    184. Re:Put them to work by cvtan · · Score: 1

      Lately my outrage is about how difficult it is to convince my granddaughter to graduate from high school. This used to be a no-brainer. Now morons like Snookie become millionaires on reality TV and I look like an idiot because wasted my time doing science and engineering. "But science and math are so HARD!" Just to clear up teenage slang: HARD means anything as difficult as defrosting a bagel. Now I'm really OT.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    185. Re:Put them to work by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Actually, Canada has fared fairly well during the "crisis". There are many differences in the way that banks extend mortgages here, so there has been no real estate crash here as there has been in the US. Now, that isn't to say we have been unaffected. Many are finding it tough, but that's mainly due to the strong ties between our economy and the failing US one.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    186. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So for example, a deeply religious parent could not (legally) deny their child "inappropriate" views on contraception, religion, or in any other way restrict their mental freedom completely."

      Can I move there with my kids? please??!

    187. Re:Put them to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Property owned and paid for" -- uhh, if they actually owned their property, it wouldn't be a problem now would it? Holding a mortgage on a property does not mean you own it. You only own it after you've paid it off in full. Before that happens, you are still in debt, and vulnerable.

      I agree people were misled, but people also need to take some responsibility for themselves and not fall for the lies and BS propaganda of the housing spruikers and financiers. A lot of the debt accumulation is driven by pure greed and selfishness. The housing bubble bursting anybody could've foreseen.

    188. Re:Put them to work by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      "Yeah but in the minds of conservative"

      Way to wrongly stereotype all conservatives. This is an example of an extreme minority of conservatives in one part of the country. PETA is the liberal equivalent of these conservatives; I'm sure most liberals wouldn't want to be lumped in with PETA or some of the extreme greens or animal rights activists.

  3. Back to the Future by tedgyz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm glad to see "book burning" is alive and well in America. I guess that's what the conservatives mean by restoring America. Now we just need to find some really cheap labor.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    1. Re:Back to the Future by getto+man+d · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now we just need to find some really cheap labor.

      Think of the children!

    2. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How ignorant.. Not one mention of political side and you just jump right on the bandwagon.

      With people like you, cheap labor will be easy to find.

    3. Re:Back to the Future by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      The European Union isn't any better when it comes to censoring books or the teachers. See my sig:

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Back to the Future by fafaforza · · Score: 0

      Deserves moderation.

    5. Re:Back to the Future by timeOday · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm glad to see "book burning" is alive and well in America. I guess that's what the conservatives mean by restoring America.

      It is. Here's what a Pastor said while introducing Rick Santorum two days ago:

      "This nation was founded as a Christian nation...there's only one God and his name is Jesus. I'm tired of people telling me that I can't say those words. [...] If you don't love America and you don't like the way we do things, I've got one thing to say -- Get out! We don't worship Buddha. I said we don't worship Buddha. We don't worship Mohammed. We don't worship Allah. We worship God. We worship God's son Jesus Christ."

      So there you have it. Santorum didn't object at the time, either.

    6. Re:Back to the Future by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Other banned books from the past:
      Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
      American Heritage Dictionary
      Catcher in the Rye
      Fahrenheit 451
      From Here to Eternity
      The Grapes of Wrath

      With the exception of the dictionary, all are timeless works of great art. What wikipedia says about Ender's game:

      Reception to the book has generally been positive, though some critics have denounced Card's perceived justification of his characters' violent actions.[3][4] It has also become suggested reading for many military organizations, including the United States Marine Corps.[5] Ender's Game won the 1985 Nebula Award for best novel[6] and the 1986 Hugo Award for best novel.

      Hey, why did <blockquote></blockquote> stop working?

      At any rate, the teacher should be reinstated and the damned administrators should be fired. TFA is still loading and I missed this book (looks like a great one I need to read, too, trip to the library this Saturday). What's supposed to be pornographic about it?

      As to the complaining parent, maybe the bitch should just stick to Dr Suess? Oh, she'll probably think Cat in the Hat is porno, too.

      No matter how good something is, someone is going to say it's utter shit.

    7. Re:Back to the Future by Noughmad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How ignorant.. Thinking there are political sides in America.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    8. Re:Back to the Future by ZorinLynx · · Score: 0

      Fucking shit, someone get that woman a sandwich or three.

      She looks a stiff breeze could break her in two. How is this in any way sexy? Why is that anorexic look considered sexy?

      Ugh. Sick of the standards for beauty in this society.

    9. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If "there is only one god and his name is jesus", then why are they worshiping "god's son jesus christ"... wouldn't it be less confusing to refer to him as jesus jr?

    10. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're fucking retarded if you think this was a liberal parent getting all up in arms over this. When was the last time that this happened anywhere but in the inbred, hillbilly, neo-fascist, very republican bible belt?

    11. Re:Back to the Future by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see "book burning" is alive and well in America. I guess that's what the conservatives mean by restoring America. Now we just need to find some really cheap non-Mexican labor.

      FTFY

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    12. Re:Back to the Future by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      How ignorant.. Not one mention of political side and you just jump right on the bandwagon.

      Yes, how could anyone conclude that an American complaining about perceived eroticism in a book would be a conservative?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    13. Re:Back to the Future by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      The European Union isn't any better when it comes to censoring books or the teachers. See my sig:

      Nice generalisation. Firstly, not EU, just Italian, secondly, parents, not a board.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    14. Re:Back to the Future by audubon · · Score: 1

      Don't blame conservativism. The author himself is a "conservative Mormon," according to TFA.

    15. Re:Back to the Future by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      I ask the same question about women (or men) that have rolls of fat. How is that in any way sexy? Especially when you consider what it's doing internally (blocked arteries, making the heart wear-out faster, cirrhosis of the liver, etc).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    16. Re:Back to the Future by jandrese · · Score: 3, Informative

      this is quoted

      blockquote works fine if you are in HTML mode, although it just shows up as another layer of indentation in the new layout.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    17. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than just book burning. Down in the south they're actually rewriting lines in famous novels to more closely adhere to their bible belt beliefs. I kid you not. That is in many ways worse than outright censorship.

    18. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We don't worship Allah. We worship God."

      I always assumed they were the same... *facepalm*

    19. Re:Back to the Future by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      What wikipedia says about Ender's game:

      Reception to the book has generally been positive

      I liked the short story, but found the book tedious.

      Hey, why did <blockquote></blockquote> stop working?

      Use quote instead of blockquote.

      At any rate, the teacher should be reinstated and the damned administrators should be fired. TFA is still loading and I missed this book (looks like a great one I need to read, too, trip to the library this Saturday). What's supposed to be pornographic about it?

      As to the complaining parent, maybe the bitch should just stick to Dr Suess? Oh, she'll probably think Cat in the Hat is porno, too.

      We've got people who do nothing but sit around watching television all day to count the number of things they find offensive and submit a complaint.

      Next time anyone starts thinking that they "haven't got a life", they should remember that they're not the bottom-feeders in that department.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    20. Re:Back to the Future by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That isn't indicative of the EU in general; your link is about a woman in Italy. If Italy weren't geographically located in Europe, it'd probably be considered a third-world country like Zimbabwe. It's in many ways one of the most backwards countries there.

      It's funny how some American replies saying she's too thin, when she looks to have an ideal BMI. Apparently a lot of Americans think obese==beautiful.

    21. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Ender's Game was a great book and I still love Jesus. Don't make this about conservatism or Christianity. Most of the Christians I know are sick of the transformation in schools where easily offended people must be constantly placated.

    22. Re:Back to the Future by daem0n1x · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you burn all the books, in a few decades ALL labour in the US will be AWESOMELY cheap!

    23. Re:Back to the Future by q-the-impaler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      conservative != social conservative

      --
      Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
    24. Re:Back to the Future by bsane · · Score: 1

      I ask the same question about women (or men) that have rolls of fat. How is that in any way sexy? Especially when you consider what it's doing internally (blocked arteries, making the heart wear-out faster, cirrhosis of the liver, etc).

      I don't think I've heard rolls of fat (or the people that have them) described as sexy. I do however see anorexic women described as sexy on a semi-regular basis.

    25. Re:Back to the Future by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with conservatism. The problem is people who are simply pants on head retarded. They come in so-called progressive flavors too.

    26. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's supposed to be pornographic about it?

      Most likely she was upset about a scene where the main character, on arriving at his new barracks finds another, female, member of his unit standing in the doorway naked.

    27. Re:Back to the Future by Timmmm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, so basically there's three Gods, and they're all God. And each one is also God. Jesus is God, Jesus's Father, God, is also God. Oh and there's the Holy Spirit - that's God too.

      At least that's what it says in the bible. It makes no sense, but the bible is Truth (tm) so Christians spend an inordinate amount of trying to understand how Jesus went back in time and became his own father.

    28. Re:Back to the Future by Kozz · · Score: 1

      I wonder where this Pastor received his MDiv such that they teach a distinction between Allah and God.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    29. Re:Back to the Future by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think I see where you're going with this... You, my friend, are a job creator!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    30. Re:Back to the Future by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "That" look is not in the least bit anorexic, and if you think it is, perhaps you need to lay off the fritos for awhile.

      She is not unrealistically thin, and you'd be doing yourself a favor by trying to look like that. Yes, there are some models who truly are unrealistically thin and set unrealistic standards of beauty. She is not one of them.

    31. Re:Back to the Future by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Informative

      They aren't even that good. The PTC has a very good strategy. Their expert Outrageists watch the television and find things to be outraged about. They then send out rallying cries via newsletter to the the organisation's mailing list and contact various conservative-leaning media to get the message spread further. The outrageable readers then hop on board and mass-mail the FCC, station, advertisers and anyone else involved demanding Something Be Done about this disgusting program - and, the beauty of the whole system, they complain without ever having seen the program they are complaining about!

    32. Re:Back to the Future by winterchapo · · Score: 1

      quick, lets throw some tax breaks his/her way!

      --
      Humor must not professedly teach and it must not professedly preach, but it must do both if it would live forever. -Mark
    33. Re:Back to the Future by NeoMorphy · · Score: 1

      If you burn all the books, in a few decades ALL labour in the US will be AWESOMELY cheap!

      Except for the professional athletes, actors/actresses, rock stars, and senior executives.

    34. Re:Back to the Future by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      That isn't indicative of the US in general; your link is about a woman in South Carolina. If South Carolina weren't geographically located in United States, it'd probably be considered a third-world country like Zimbabwe. It's in many ways one of the most backwards states there.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    35. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem isn't that people think it's utter shit. The real problem is that the law backs them and says "its shit so you cant spread this filth". This is because of 2 assumptions that are made both wrong. One assumption being that they are smarter, wiser and better than you which honestly doesn't bother me for a second. It is the second assumption which is the problem. They get the law to get you to voice your opinions because you the teacher gave ideas to children not sanctioned as acceptable. When combined the assumptions both oppress and and give legal sanction for it. Taken a half step further and you have a situation where someone says "um.. yea, that book in your hand... its dangerous and you are a criminal for owning it." You may stammer "but but but it's a childrens book... i mean dude... its the lorax?!?!?!" the officer will reply "Tree Huggin Pervert, I know all about those brown barbaloots... get in the car."

      One of my early economics teachers once said "beware the slippery slope". Wonder if he is in jail right now? lol

    36. Re:Back to the Future by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      If "there is only one god and his name is jesus", then why are they worshiping "god's son jesus christ"... wouldn't it be less confusing to refer to him as jesus jr?

      No, Jesus is His own Son.

      This takes the incest thing to a whole 'nother level...

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    37. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I might have been marginally surprised, except that I already discovered that "In the Night Kitchen" is one of the most banned books in America (part of the "Where the Wild Things Are" trilogy, for some idea if you haven't come across it). And the bit about mad pastors supporting Sick Rantorum? Yeah, well I used to think that http://www.landoverbaptist.org/ was a parody but I'm less and less sure it isn't genuine.

      Crazy Elmers...

    38. Re:Back to the Future by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      "We don't worship Allah. We worship God."

      I always assumed they were the same... *facepalm*

      For some strange reason, people have come to think of "God" as some deity's proper name.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    39. Re:Back to the Future by Aryden · · Score: 1

      I'll guarantee she does not have the ideal BMI. If you didn't notice, the boobs are fake.

    40. Re:Back to the Future by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Don't blame conservativism. The author himself is a "conservative Mormon," according to TFA.

      Yeah that fits the bill. Rabidly anti-gay in particular. Should be fairly easy to find some juicy quotes from him on the topic.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    41. Re:Back to the Future by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Let us not forget how cannibalism is an integral part of this "worship".

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    42. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Numerous occasions in the past three years, in fact. Do us all a favor, and go educate yourself, instead of being a dipshit with a half-assed political agenda.

      Fact: Overly conservative parents object to books that they consider "pornographic" or "anti-religious." (see: Ender's Game)
      Fact: Overly liberal parents object to books that they consider too "racist" or "insensitive." (see: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn)

      If you actually care to read a fairly nuanced essay about book censorship, you could start here. Then you could stop pretending that there's any difference between overly protective 'conservative' parents and overly protective 'liberal' parents when it comes to their children reading material that goes against the orthodoxy those children are being taught at home.

    43. Re:Back to the Future by Aryden · · Score: 1

      3 facets of the same being, with one being the physical manifestation of that divinity on earth. Took a friggin Catholic scholar to explain that one to me when I was about...10.

    44. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare to Sofia Vergara (Colombian, not American). Not obese. Certainly far more beautiful than woman from link, whose BMI looks below ideal to me (an American with a 22.4 BMI)

    45. Re:Back to the Future by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem with your analogy is that much of the US is just like South Carolina: the entire southeast, most of the "heartland", etc. And even lots of people in other states have the same mentality as South Carolinians.

      This is rather different from Europe, where people in Germany, France, Denmark, Netherlands, Poland, and Czech Republic are very different culturally from people in Italy and Greece.

    46. Re:Back to the Future by timeOday · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't make this about conservatism or Christianity.

      Why not, where do you think this is coming from? Read this:

      The Daily Caller flags a little-discussed position paper on Rick Santorum's campaign websiteâ"his pledge to aggressively prosecute those who produce and distribute pornography. Santorum avers that "America is suffering a pandemic of harm from pornography." He pledges to use the resources of the Department of Justice to fight that "pandemic," by bringing obscenity prosecutions against pornographers... His statement references going after pornography that is distributed not just on the Internet, but also "on cable/satellite TV, on hotel/motel TV."

      Mind you, I have nothing against abstaining from pornography or preaching against it, but this is something else. And don't say Santorum speaks only for himself, the point here is how many votes he is getting.

    47. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is soo much wrong with that quote. The pastor should be discharged even though i am not a christian.
       

      there's only one God and his name is Jesus

      We worship God

      We worship God's son Jesus Christ

      he should jsut pick any two to hide his ignorance. Also he should learn to count...

      Get out!

      We don't worship Buddha

      We don't worship Mohammed

      We don't worship Allah

      We worship God

      We worship God's son Jesus Christ

       

      I've got one thing to say

      which one is it?

    48. Re:Back to the Future by Aryden · · Score: 1

      citation for that? I live here in the south currently, haven't heard about this one.

    49. Re:Back to the Future by DroolTwist · · Score: 2

      As to the complaining parent, maybe the bitch should just stick to Dr Suess? Oh, she'll probably think Cat in the Hat is porno, too.

      No matter how good something is, someone is going to say it's utter shit.

      Well, we all know what 'Green Eggs and Ham' references. If thats not porn, then what is?? If only parents knew they were responsible for the booming porn industry by reading Dr Suess books to their kids at young ages.

    50. Re:Back to the Future by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      It's not perfect, but I felt the point would be clearer if I phrased as closely as possible to your words.

      Still, this is one district. I'll concede that it's very likely not the only district where this could happen, but there are plenty of others where complaints like this one are given the treatment they deserve. To me, the one encouraging facet to this story is that it's unusual enough to be newsworthy.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    51. Re:Back to the Future by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      blockquote works fine if you are in HTML mode, although it just shows up as another layer of indentation in the new layout.

      Is there any reason that HTML mode is better than Plain Old Text?
      AFAIK, Plain Old Text works exactly the same, but will automatically link urls and you don't have to use line breaks or paragraph tags.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    52. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The European Union isn't any better when it comes to censoring books or the teachers. See my sig: Sexy European teacher Boycotted by upset parents - http://on.rt.com/icha8v

      If she had been fired for being black/fat/gay/religious there would have been lawsuits galore, but because she was fired for being attractive it's legal?

      Yep, world's coming to an end.

    53. Re:Back to the Future by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      She's almost 40. To not have fat rolls, one must not have fat.

    54. Re:Back to the Future by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      He didn't have to "go back" in time. God is timeless, whatever that means.

    55. Re:Back to the Future by anagama · · Score: 1

      True.

      It's also worth pointing out that Democrat != liberal.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    56. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never thought Fahrenheit 451 to be prophetic, but that is the precise impression I got from that article.
      Damn visionaries and their prophetic warnings...

    57. Re:Back to the Future by gv250 · · Score: 2

      For some strange reason, people have come to think of "God" as some deity's proper name.

      Because God wouldn't tell us God's proper name. When Moses asked "What should people call you?", God answered "I AM THAT I AM. Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, `I AM hath sent me unto you.'" (King James, Exodus 3:14)

      Since "The Immortal State of Existence" was kind of a long name, and "I am" was awkward to use in conversation, we shortened it to: God.

    58. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this version of christanity, conflicts with the definition of god, as I learned it as catholic.

    59. Re:Back to the Future by iamhassi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At any rate, the teacher should be reinstated and the damned administrators should be fired.

      Naw, I'm pretty sure it went like this:

      Parent: This book is pornographic and the teacher is reading it to my 14 yr old!
      Superintendent: Ender's Game? (thinking: I haven't read that) What parts are pornographic? (read: take quotes out of context and make them sound bad)
      Parent: (thinking: shit! I haven't read it either! I just hate that teacher!) .... um.... (quickly googles ender's game pornographic) .... See! It's right there, at the top of google! Ender's Game is pornographic!
      Superintendent: OH! Well! That changes everything! I will definitely fire that teacher! .... by the way, are you voting for Santorum? Google "Santorum" and let's see what comes up....

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    60. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, people do complain about the sequel -- The Cat in the Hat Comes Back.
      Towards the end of the book the children have (*gasp*) toy guns.

      And there's that shower scene too... (no really, go look.)

    61. Re:Back to the Future by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      For some strange reason, people have come to think of "God" as some deity's proper name.

      It's "God"(tm) then. Or would that be "God" (c) -2000 ? Or even "God" (R) ? I'm sure the Republicans would love that last one :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    62. Re:Back to the Future by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      Cool - it's a DOS attack with humans as captured nodes. Memetic warfare FTW! :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    63. Re:Back to the Future by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Agreed about the short story vs. the book.

      The sequels were far, far worse (at least as far as I read them).

      And the rest of Card's writing...atrociously written, thinly veiled Mormon proselytizing. Almost as bad as Kim Stanly Robinson.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    64. Re:Back to the Future by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's SO confusing. I mean, I'm a father, a brother, and a son! All at the same freaking time! And on top of that, I'm pclminion! I mean who the hell can get their head around that? He's a father... AND a brother? And the father is pclminion, and the brother is pclminion, and the son is pclminion? MY GOD I CANNOT GRASP THIS

    65. Re:Back to the Future by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's worse than just book burning. Up north they rewrote Huck Fin and Tom Sawyer to more closely adhere to their Politically correct beliefs. I kid you not. That is in many ways worse than outright censorship.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    66. Re:Back to the Future by peppepz · · Score: 1
      Parents have no say over teachers' choice of readings in Italy. It's almost impossible to fire a teacher there; in order to get fired, a teacher must at least beat his students (in certain parts of the country, the converse is much more likely to happen though).

      By the age of 14, italian students must have already studied (by ministerial programme) important pieces of italian literature such as the Decameron (a kind of "the Canterbury Tales") which contain many stories with explicit (and sometimes colourful) references to sexuality.

    67. Re:Back to the Future by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      That's good, finding a Delorean these days that can hit 88 mph is no small task, even God would have trouble with that one.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    68. Re:Back to the Future by steelfood · · Score: 1

      there's only one God and his name is Jesus.

      He just denied the Father and deified the Son, first commandment be damned. I'm surprised nobody caught that bit of blasphemy.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    69. Re:Back to the Future by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      all are timeless works of great art

      Fahrenheit 451 is not a "great work of art." It was in insightful self-referential (though not internally, but in the burnings it has been a part of) social commentary, wrapped in a fiction to make it more palatable (as is the definition of all good science fiction, where tech is not plot advancing - transporters and such - but a commentary about today's society made possible by the use of technology).

      Art are the books more like Enders Game and Dune where the re-read value is high. Much like "real" art has a re-veiwing value (people stare at paintings for a long time, the best popular representation of that sadly being Ferris Bueler's Day Off's museum scene).

    70. Re:Back to the Future by EdIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not such a bad idea. Can you imagine how effective a 5 year old could be at cable runs at data centers and in office building ceilings? All it would cost me is some Snackables and a visit to Chuck E Cheese later.

    71. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As to the complaining parent, maybe the bitch should just stick to Dr Suess? Oh, she'll probably think Cat in the Hat is porno, too.

      No, not the Cat in the Hat. But Faux News did ask the tough question that no other news source will ask: Is The Lorax leftist propaganda? so she knows that The Lorax is unamerican and should be banned.

    72. Re:Back to the Future by EdIII · · Score: 1

      In the same breath they can claim superiority to a nation run with Sharia law....

    73. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is only a conservative issue. Just like the Patriot Act was just conservatives too, eh?
       
      Keep your head in the sand, pal. It's easy to see that you don't care as long as your own favorite team wins the game.... damn policy! This is a popularity contest!

    74. Re:Back to the Future by Deathmoo · · Score: 1

      Ender's game is classic, one of the greats. I read it when I was in Elementary school.

      The parts about destroying an entire civilization were much more disturbing than any "pornography" that was in the book. I honestly have read it many times since, and I don't know the parts that would be considered pornographic?

      I can only hope this is all a big mistake. Depriving children of this great work of art would be tragic.

      The whole bleeding heart liberal thing is just getting really old to me. Those of us that can THINK need to hold this type of activity back. Censorship is WRONG.

    75. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People that worship things are strange.

    76. Re:Back to the Future by toriver · · Score: 1

      This takes the incest thing to a whole 'nother level...

      Not to mention time travel. Timecop 2 has nothing on ye olde "God and Son of God" paradox thingy.

    77. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me myself never buy stuff made by children. Children have no sense for quality!!!

       

    78. Re:Back to the Future by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Those of us in the middle think you should really think about the text and what it has to say.

    79. Re:Back to the Future by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Frankly, the book seems far more objectionable to liberal sensibilities than those of conservatives from my perspective - it is a book that justifies xenocide and is on the Marine Corps reading list.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    80. Re:Back to the Future by toriver · · Score: 1

      Depending on location, I would guess Uncle Tom's Cabin and The Cider House Rules should be in the list.

      Ender's Game is great as sci-fi that addresses topics the class can talk about. No, not bloody nudity, but responsibility and consequences.

    81. Re:Back to the Future by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Problem is, if a 5 year old comes into a house to fix the cable, that could be considered child porn.

    82. Re:Back to the Future by aitikin · · Score: 1

      I was moreso thinking the fight between the main character and a (I can't for the life of me remember if it was individual or group of) nude student(s) got into a fight in the showers. Card goes into a decent degree of detail with it, which, I guess, could be construed as pornographic by an extremely loose definition.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    83. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Tritheism. Coincidentally the theological understanding of Mormons like Orson Scott Card. Evangelical Christians on the other hand believe in the Trinity: One God revealed in three persons. Each person is God, but there remains only one God--not three.

      The understanding that Jesus would have to go "back in time and [become] his own father" would amount to Modalism--which is also not the Trinity. God is a superpersonal being wherein each person co-exists simultaneously revealing the one God.

      Such a concept might not be completely fathomable, but it makes perfect "sense" to me. It's hard to visualize a four-dimensional object like a hypercube with our limited 3-dimensional understanding and 2-dimensional planar vision, but that doesn't make the object any less understandable mathematically.

    84. Re:Back to the Future by deciduousness · · Score: 1

      They don't have to burn a book, they just remove them.

      ~RATM

    85. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us not forget how cannibalism is an integral part of this "worship".

      And "love feasts". We all know that's just code for orgies. They're also intent on the violent overthrow of Rome.

    86. Re:Back to the Future by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Bah, put it on a railroad track and push it with a train, don't need an engine or transmission anymore at that point.

    87. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a good book, but a bit of a guilty pleasure for the outcast male turned hero bit. It is kinda escapist, like saying 'if you were abused and tortured you too can come out to be the most healthy and capable kid there is' which is completely the opposite in real life, and giving people this kind of expectation only makes it harder to address for those who need our help. Still, it hits a deep nerve with people who have endured prolonged and constant perceived danger, and I like how it pushes for universal moral standards of value to include not just your fellow tribe, but everyone beyond it.

    88. Re:Back to the Future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      .... a visit to Chuck E Cheese later.

      on second thought, it's not worth it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    89. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 1

      Sick of the standards for beauty in this society.

      Good thing the average woman in society - size 12-14, and medically considered overweight - bears little resemblance to that woman, then.

      If you think that woman looks anorexic, I submit that you've never seen a real person suffering from anorexia. The woman you're referring to is certainly slender, but doesn't appear to be suffering from anorexia in any way. In fact, you can see in her shoulders and legs that she has plenty of visible muscle mass - something you're not likely to see in someone suffering from anorexia.

      Do yourself a favor and go look up some images of real people with anorexia sometime - you do them a tremendous disservice by describing that woman as "anorexic."

    90. Re:Back to the Future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      She looks to be a perfectly healthy weight.

      You're view seems to have been skewed by all the fat people on TV/

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    91. Re:Back to the Future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      hahahaha.. Ender's game is good, but it is also highly overrated. The ending is stupid weak.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    92. Re:Back to the Future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      SO you read a book when you where in elementary school and liked it, and THAT makes it one of the great. Please, tell me of the vast history of reading, and thinking about novels you had prior to elementary school.

      You basically had no bar to measure it against, and now it's a great because of your emotional ties to i in elementary school

      Please, tell my ONE sentence that is clever? Explain to me why the ending isn't weak?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    93. Re:Back to the Future by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Ok, so basically there's three Gods, and they're all God. And each one is also God. Jesus is God, Jesus's Father, God, is also God. Oh and there's the Holy Spirit - that's God too.

      At least that's what it says in the bible.

      Well, except for the fact that it doesn't say that anywhere in the Bible.

    94. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muslims make a distinction between Allah and the Christian view of God. “Allah is one.” I.E. there is no holy trinity.

    95. Re:Back to the Future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It does now. Have you been paying attention?

      Long gone are the days of fiscal conservative, social moderate pubs.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    96. Re:Back to the Future by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      They rewrote your news too.

    97. Re:Back to the Future by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But I know more than one person who re-read it more than once, putting it more into "high art" territory than Farenheight 451. It was also on the top of my mind because of the subject of the article that this falls under.

    98. Re:Back to the Future by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Party is as party does.

      Also - if Democrat != liberal, then what's the point of having a Democratic party?

      --
      Check your premises.
    99. Re:Back to the Future by ffflala · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Problem is that second fact of yours isn't one. This issue isn't one where the behavior is the same on both sides of the aisle.

      I'm a librarian, and I've been on the other end of a few attempts at book bans, and have probably heard more about them than most non-librarians. I have never seen nor heard an account of an "overly liberal parent" who objects to "books that they consider too racist or insensitive" to the point that --and this is an important distinction-- said person demands to have a book removed from a collection and made unavailable to students/people/kids.

      I've never seen this behavior, I've never heard of it, and your own links don't provide even any anecdotal references to it. Your second link does describe how many liberals will often stock their libraries with books that support their own worldview, and how they will push to have these books included on school reading lists. That might be true enough, but it is absolutely inaccurate to equate this with book banning/censorship, as the article does. Sure, it is advocating one's own world view. However showing preference to certain books is very, very different from removing access to certain books. Only one of these things is censorship.

      Book banning is censorship, and it is a typical (and a stereotypical) conservative solution, not a liberal one.

    100. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    101. Re:Back to the Future by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Fool! We don't use steam locomotives anymore. How are they going to put Doc Brown's special bundles of speed into the firebox!? Diesel locomotives *can't* spit out a wicked plume of red smoke!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    102. Re:Back to the Future by airdweller · · Score: 1

      Does it still make sense considering that you're now older than 10?

    103. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 2

      Really. Then why is Huck Finn one of the top books on the ALA's list of most-challenged books? Are you telling me that it's - to borrow a phrase from the AC I originally replied to - "inbred, hillbilly, neo-fascist, very republican bible belt" conservatives who are challenging the teaching of a book filled with racial slurs? I would think those inbred hillbillies would LOVE the idea of indoctrinating children in this manner, wouldn't you?

      Congratulations on your anecdote that you've never seen a liberal parent get hysterical over a book. I assure you, it happens. As far as my links not supporting the assertion, you clearly didn't actually look at the data available on the map. If you bother to look at the map I linked, you'll also see that quite-liberal enclaves fall prey, and not - as you're probably assuming - for "Jenny's Two Mommies!" conservative hysteria. Here's a 'fer instance':

      "Seattle, Washington: (2011) Aldous Huxley's Brave New World was retained on the list of approved materials that Seattle, Wash. high school teachers may use in their language arts curriculum. A parent had complained that the book has a “high volume of racially offensive derogatory language and misinformation on Native Americans. In addition to the inaccurate imagery, and stereotype views, the text lacks literary value which is relevant to today’s contemporary multicultural society."

      Is the language of that objection more typical of an overly-sensitive politically-correct liberal, or an inbred conservative hillbilly? The book survived the challenge, but you're a fool if you think that extremists on both sides of the American political spectrum aren't trying to suppress materials that conflict with their world view.

    104. Re:Back to the Future by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with conservatism.

      No True Scottsman. Guessing you might be a financial conservative....but freaking out over something remotely pornographic (in print) is the epitome of social conservatism.

      The problem is people who are simply pants on head retarded. They come in so-called progressive flavors too.

      "So called" indeed. When Tipper Gore was having the vapors over rap music, she wasn't being "progressive", she was being....socially conservative.

    105. Re:Back to the Future by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Party is as party does.

      So does that mean that gun control has at time been a "conservative" goal because gun control laws have at times been backed by Republicans?

      Also - if Democrat != liberal, then what's the point of having a Democratic party?

      To present voters with the illusion of choice. To ensure that when a "vote the bums out" election occurs, that voters have a choice between Corporate Whore Warmonger A and Corporate Whore Warmonger B. To keep the rubes distracted with TV debates over abortion rights to fight the shared agenda of both parties: endless war, shredding the Constitution, and selling out the vast majority of Americans to make the rich richer.

    106. Re:Back to the Future by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Unless you have celiac disease... then you just... kind of try to avoid thinking what the implications of that are.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    107. Re:Back to the Future by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, what if they just fixed the cable?

    108. Re:Back to the Future by ffflala · · Score: 1
      The problem is that you still seem to equate "getting hysterical over a book" with book bans and censorship. It is not the same thing at all, and the responses differ in an important way that you simply gloss over. Of course people from over the spectrum get upset and will complain about books they find controversial or offensive.

      In the same article you quote, the very person who made that statement goes on to makes this point:

      Sense-Wilson wants to make her position clear. She is not trying to ban the book. "We are not about book burning and we're not radicals," she says. "We're not trying to in any way censor that book, we're just saying it does not belong in high school. It is not appropriate for the curriculum." If the book is an important or interesting novel for teenagers, she suggests putting it in the library.

      *That* is very typical behavior for an outraged liberal parent. If you don't see the difference, I'm not really sure how to else to explain it in a way that makes sense to you.

      For some reason you seem to believe that only liberals will get upset about Huck Finn. This is not at all true; calls for its banning have been based on perceptions of negative social commentary about the South, even that it improperly promoted interracial friendships.

      I simply can't follow your point about the google maps at all. Do you believe that there are simply no deeply conservative people at all in "liberal enclaves"?

    109. Re:Back to the Future by Deathmoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it isn't the VERY BEST book in existence. But don't they all have to be, do they? The point of the conversation was the unreasonable censoring of a teacher for daring to introduce this book to their students.

      Sorry you didn't like Ender's Game, but I do know a few that DO like it. And yes, I have found a few that were better since, you know, since it was like 20 years ago.

      I think my point stands, that it isn't pr0n, and it is worthwhile reading.

    110. Re:Back to the Future by audubon · · Score: 1

      So you agree, then, that conservatism shouldn't be blamed for the effort to censor Card's book.

    111. Re:Back to the Future by Toze · · Score: 1

      And to complete the trifecta of 2,000-year-old complaints about Christianity, with all their talk about loving their brothers and sisters, they are orgiastic and/or incestuous!

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    112. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Numerous occasions in the past three years, in fact. Do us all a favor, and go educate yourself, instead of being a dipshit with a half-assed political agenda.

      Fact: Overly conservative parents object to books that they consider "pornographic" or "anti-religious." (see: Ender's Game)
      Fact: Overly liberal parents object to books that they consider too "racist" or "insensitive." (see: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn)

      If you actually care to read a fairly nuanced essay about book censorship, you could start here. Then you could stop pretending that there's any difference between overly protective 'conservative' parents and overly protective 'liberal' parents when it comes to their children reading material that goes against the orthodoxy those children are being taught at home.

      Hmmmm - I object to books that are pornographic and to books that are racist. But I object to neither Ender's Game or Huck Finn.
      So what am I ?

    113. Re:Back to the Future by rossz · · Score: 1

      Rewriting the sage words of Mark Twain is a greater sin than burning his work. And anyone who claims Huck Finn is racist hasn't read the fucking book (or is too stupid to understand the entire point of the story).

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    114. Re:Back to the Future by Livius · · Score: 1

      Doesn't 3x = x imply x = 0?

    115. Re:Back to the Future by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Actually no. I simply agree that Card would certainly qualify as a social conservative.

      Objections to his works can still certainly come from a conservative quarter. It's not like there's a monolithic one true conservative way of thinking, not to mention that there's room for misunderstanding.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    116. Re:Back to the Future by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Fact: People who say "Fact" without a citation are basically dumbasses.
      Citation- http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fGlRS0W7KWE/TtqB-4V0ufI/AAAAAAAAcx0/4IjuHRIZp3g/s1600/dumbass.jpg

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    117. Re:Back to the Future by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Red Diesel fuel! Or a mining push cart, manned by a giant robot spewing a wicked plume of red smoke.

    118. Re:Back to the Future by skine · · Score: 1

      And if you count the Muslim and Jewish versions as separate incarnations, that makes five.

    119. Re:Back to the Future by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      We've got people who do nothing but sit around watching television all day to count the number of things they find offensive and submit a complaint.

      Doesn't take all day. It only takes a few minutes with cable:
      Jerry Springer
      Maury Povich
      Biggest Loser

      I'll leave it up to you to expand the list since I don't watch much TV.

    120. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 0

      Fact: I provided citations and supporting evidence.
      Fact: You are - apparently - illiterate.

      Citation: Your post.

    121. Re:Back to the Future by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      A maxim Slashdotters will appreciate:

      The Bible is the world's first EULA. People agree to what's in it without ever reading it.

    122. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 1, Informative

      The problem is that you still seem to equate "getting hysterical over a book" with book bans and censorship.

      No, the problem is that you seem unable to comprehend that the cases I'm citing for you are people attempting to ban books for very liberal reasons, as well as very conservative reasons, and that in both cases, it is parents attempting to have books banned from school curriculums *because it offends their personal sensibilities somehow.* Claiming that "only inbred conservative hillbillies" will seek to ban books is a position that is as fundamentally incorrect as it is idiotic.

      You seem intent on finding a way to justify suppressing a book from a school curriculum because it's not a "ban" on the book. I'm curious what you consider a ban, if forcing an entire school district (which at one point thought a book was a valuable teaching aid) to pretend a book doesn't exist, and rework their entire curriculum with a less heterodox choice? And if you really can maintain that that doesn't constitute censorship or banning of a book, well then, I guess we have a precedent to remove any book that gets challenged from any curriculum it's used in, since, you know, anybody who "wants" to read the offending book can always order themselves a copy from Amazon -- right?

      My post was a response to the arrogant twat who opined that "only hillbilly inbred republicans" seek to ban books. This is patently false, as I have demonstrated. Moreover it is a dangerously naive conceit which tries to justify the liberals who try to ban books for whatever reason as "not ACTUALLY trying to ban books," and substituting some quaint euphemism in place of the word "censorship." The point is that overly sensitive people of all political stripes will seek to suppress and censor books that disagree with their orthodoxy, and it is always - for any reason, for any justification - wrong.

      If you cannot understand this point, then I question your reading comprehension, as well as your claims to work as a librarian - you're certainly no friend of the written word if you're that quick to justify why an attempt to ban a book isn't "really" an attempt at censorship.

    123. Re:Back to the Future by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      A much easier explanation...

      God is like the ocean, vast and infinite. Jesus is like an ice sculpture, one physical form at a place and time. The holy spirit is like 2000psi steam, that is invisible, and you can't touch, but you know it's there when a train whistles.

      But they are all water.. From the same sea... Not really different at all.

    124. Re:Back to the Future by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Not such a bad idea. Can you imagine how effective a 5 year old could be at cable runs at data centers and in office building ceilings?

      Nor an original one. One of the first main uses of child labor in the industrial revolution was to climb into the tight locations under looms to jiggle equipment and fix threads. Of course, since they didn't turn the looms off, t'was a tad more dangerous.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    125. Re:Back to the Future by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Most of the book censorship in schools is done by liberals, not conservatives, as they are the ones who push for public school funding and thus end up running the system at the federal and state levels. These people set the curriculum, and whether intentional or not, their political bias has created institutional bias in school.

    126. Re:Back to the Future by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      What you've described sounds like modalism, which is regected by Catholic teaching. Catholic teaching says there are three distinct "persons" sharing one "nature". Here the concepts "nature" and "person" are technical terms borrowed from philosophy, but they are not simply facets of one divinity.

    127. Re:Back to the Future by ffflala · · Score: 1

      "Cases"? Interesting use of the plural. You have used one (1) example, it was a quote from a blog you partially read, and the very next four paragraphs (which I qutoted right back atcha, after I found the blog post) proves your assumption wrong. You use the word "ban" to describe a woman who is happy to keep a book she objects to in a school library. You go on to claim she tries to have it wiped from the school system. Where this comes from just baffles me. Where are you seeing this?

      Anyway IOW, that "liberal" example of yours --one you provided only in response, one which you didn't bother to source- also precisely demonstrates the same distinction between "ban" and "complain" that I've been trying to describe to you. Apparently you still don't see any difference.

      But then you say you gave me "cases" that supported you. I saw just the one. In case I missed it -- what exactly was the other case, again?

    128. Re:Back to the Future by ffflala · · Score: 1

      Just fyi, I"m not the AC. I have family in the South, and am aware how annoying the regional stereotypes can be. If you're really more upset by the term *only hillbilly inbred republicans* here and have taken it personally, know that your emotional quarrel is with someone else.

    129. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much thought, with so little evidence.

    130. Re:Back to the Future by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Actually, "Allah" and "God" are the exact same deity.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    131. Re:Back to the Future by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Fahrenheit 451 was banned?

      The irony, it BUUUUURNS!

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    132. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That photo is pretty poor, so I Googled her. Nope, not unhealthy. There are many many unhealthily thin models out there, she's definitely not one of them.

    133. Re:Back to the Future by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      As to the complaining parent, maybe the bitch should just stick to Dr Suess? Oh, she'll probably think Cat in the Hat is porno, too.

      While in high school in the early 80s I had a job in the public library. One day a lady came in with a stack of Dr. Seuss books. She dropped them on the counter and said, "My husband told me to return these books because they're INAPPROPRIATE for our children." Now, there's a whole lot of WTF packed into that one sentence. But yes, there are people who think The Cat in the Hat is bad for kids.

      Although I do wonder about Green Eggs and Ham. "Could you, would you, with a goat?" Ahem!

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    134. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 2

      That map I linked to contains dozens of examples, if you can't be bothered to read the data provided, I'm not about to sit here and cut and paste it all for you. The example I cited was just that - if you want to read the full list, then you will, and you're welcome to - I'll not recite it for you.

      Interestingly, I notice that you omitted this part of the story about Ms. Sense-Wilson:

      Why is this book still an issue? Sense-Wilson wants other high schools in Seattle to stop using it in their curriculum too. The Seattle School board is meeting this afternoon to discuss the use of the book Brave New World.

      Oops, guess you missed that part, huh? No, she doesn't want to ban it - she just wants to make sure that teachers can't use it in a classroom setting anywhere in the Seattle School District. I guess if we don't use ugly words like "ban," what she's trying to do doesn't constitute "banning" the book. No, it's just "a perfectly reasonable request that an entire municipal public school system change it's curriculum by pretending the book doesn't exist." There are numerous other examples on the list I provided where "racial insensitivity," are cited as the reason for wanting to ban the book - feel free to read, or not. If expanding your worldview to understand that people seek to ban books for ALL KINDS of reasons - not just because they're backwards hillbillies, or conservative - is more than you're willing to do, then I'm done trying to have a rational discussion with you.

      Also:

      Didn't bother to source

      The links - to ALA, and the NPR writeup on the ALA's map, are my source. Again - if you can't be bothered to explore the data points on the map, I'll not do your homework for you. You wanted to chime in and tell me how wrong I was that seeking to ban books is a phenomenon that can be witnessed on both sides of the political aisle, but you've refused to offer any counter-evidence of your own, and you've obstinately refused to read the fucking data I've provided to you.

      distinction between "ban" and "complain"

      The distinction between the two is simply that a "complaint" precedes a "ban." The complaint in the case of Ender's Game, and the complaint in the case of Brave New World, BOTH sought to effect the removal of the book from school curriculum. You seem to think that a situation where "you can always find it in a bookstore, or a library, if you already know about the book and go seeking it out, but the teachers aren't allowed to mention the existence of the book anymore, despite their feelings on its value as a teaching aid," doesn't constitute a ban. If that's the case, may we also conclude that you support the parent in this case, and agree that Ender's Game should be banned from the curriculum, and the teacher should perhaps even be fired for bringing such "shocking" material into the classroom? I mean, people who want to read Ender's Game can always find it somewhere outside the classroom, so nobody's proposing we BAN the book - right? It's just a perfectly reasonable "complaint"!

      I can only hold your hand so far, friend. I'll lead you to information, but I sure can't make you think.

    135. Re:Back to the Future by SnEptUne · · Score: 1

      I don't think grandparent implied that Jesus, Heavenly Father, and Holy Spirit is the same, it is just bad analogy. Jesus as a human does not "change" into one and the other, and all three trinity are distinct yet in one. Jesus has his own personhood as a human, divinity as God, and he exists before Abraham. The concept of the three divinity is merely an perception and people's insight in bible, not something that is spelt out in bible. I suspect it will become quadnity (4) during the second coming of Jesus, no?

    136. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 2

      If you're really more upset by the term *only hillbilly inbred republicans* here and have taken it personally, know that your emotional quarrel is with someone else.

      As I've already said, I'm really more upset by the attempt to characterize "book banning" and "censorship" as something that is only a characteristic of conservatives, rather than a commonality between the extremes on both sides of the political spectrum.

      If you're really more upset by the phrase "liberals also seek to ban books" and have taken it personally, know that your emotional sensitivity does not provide sufficient justification for you to pretend the facts I've laid out do not exist.

    137. Re:Back to the Future by ffflala · · Score: 1

      You've never worked in the public service sector, have you.

    138. Re:Back to the Future by tftp · · Score: 1

      Doesn't 3x = x imply x = 0?

      Not any more than a belief that 3D objects do not exist.

      I don't subscribe to any religion, but from purely mathematical POV this God thing can be easily explained by God existing also in another dimension. Then that God could have multiple projections (3D sections) and each section would be a manifestation of the same being. However at the same time each section would have individuality. If you, a 3D person, are stuck through Flatland, your head will be a circle and it can speak. Your hands' section would be able to grab things, your feet's section would be able to move around. But each section will be a part of you. So this ancient tale is quite reasonable, and many a SciFi writer posited a similar higher-dimensional being.

    139. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 2

      Nope. Would having worked in the public sector help me understand why you seem incapable of processing the information I've provided you with? Would it help me understand how you can blithely assert that demanding that an entire school district remove all references to a particular book in its curriculum doesn't constitute censorship? Would it help me to understand why, despite disagreeing with me strenuously, you seem incapable of providing any information of your own to back up your commentary?

      Because if it won't help me understand any of that, I'm not certain I see the relevance of the question, other than to provide you with one more excuse to hand-wave away inconvenient points I've raised, because you *really feel* like I must not be correct, despite the facts and evidence I've provided to support my statements.

    140. Re:Back to the Future by celle · · Score: 1

      "Fact: Overly conservative parents object to books that they consider "pornographic" or "anti-religious." (see: Ender's Game)
      Fact: Overly liberal parents object to books that they consider too "racist" or "insensitive." (see: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn)"

          Amazing how carefree and indifferent to things we were. Then we became parents and the bottom fell out on everything we believed before. How the mighty fall in their hypocrisy.

    141. Re:Back to the Future by ffflala · · Score: 1

      despite the facts and evidence I've provided to support my statements.

      I'd appreciate it if you could just point me to exactly that. You have provided none that I see. Perhaps my liberal bias keeps me from noticing whatever source you provided in this response.

      Once again, you claim to have provided multiple sources, without providing any. Your request to supporting material seems odd, since my last cite was to your own source, and again that disproved the very point you were trying to make. If you'd like to read further, start by checking out the rest of the 99 books on the top 100 banned books list.

    142. Re:Back to the Future by Aryden · · Score: 1

      It makes sense as a belief, logically, it does not. But then, I do not pretend to attempt to apply logic to religious beliefs, especially when fanaticism may be involved.

    143. Re:Back to the Future by Aryden · · Score: 1

      One thing that I will openly give to the Catholic orders, there are many priests that will sit and have intellectual discourse over the concepts bandied about in the bible. I've had many excellent discussions with priests that would infuriate most other religious leaders. In this instance, we're talking about a broad policy handed down by the church, which some orders will follow while others will take as a "suggestion".

    144. Re:Back to the Future by Aryden · · Score: 1

      If you watched local news here, you would truly believe that...

    145. Re:Back to the Future by Americano · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Scroll up.

      See those links I provided?

      Good. Now go read.

      Quoting one sentence that says "she said they should put it in the library," while disregarding the sentence before it where it's reported that the woman in question has *actually* asked the school board to ban the book in question from use in school curriculum across the entire district, and repeatedly insisting that I provided no other information (ALA list of most-banned books? NPR report with map sourced from the ALA showing bans & challenges over the past 3 years? Said map with summary of each case, the book(s) in question, and the location where it was reported from, providing you with ample evidence to go read more details on your own?) just screams "disingenuous."

      I'm done with this conversation, you're being deliberately obtuse, and I have neither the patience nor the inclination to educate you further. As I said previously, I can lead you to information, but I can't make you think.

    146. Re:Back to the Future by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's precious little about the trinity in the Bible (indeed, it doesn't even mention the word anywhere!) - most of passages Christians use to justify the doctrine are stretched so thin you can practically hear them snapping. Indeed, many early Christians did not subscribe to the concept - Arians and Niceans have been struggling for several centuries before the latter prevailed.

    147. Re:Back to the Future by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Heck, that's nothing - Democrat != democrat, and Liberal != liberal!

    148. Re:Back to the Future by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      As a Lay Preacher, Let me explain the Trinity to you, using the Gospel according to Sony:(UK Edition)*

      A TV is switched on - and there are three people in the room looking at it:

      Person one says "Its Green"

      Person 2 says "Its the Wembley Stadium"

      Person 3 says "Its the Cup Final"

      Yes, they are looking at the same picture, and seeing different things.

      * I expect it is quite easy to produce an American Equivalent.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    149. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so basically there's three Gods, and they're all God. And each one is also God. Jesus is God, Jesus's Father, God, is also God. Oh and there's the Holy Spirit - that's God too.

      And it seems that every monotehist religion worship the same "guy" (like in "mono")... religious people are just lost in translation (Allah === God === Joe The Plumber)

    150. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking shit, someone get that woman a sandwich or three.

      She looks a stiff breeze could break her in two. How is this in any way sexy? Why is that anorexic look considered sexy?

      Ugh. Sick of the standards for beauty in this society.

      Only fatties give you a real phone number? Sorry bro.

    151. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly wrong. The Bible does not say this. Most of Christendom believes it, but it doesn't actually say that. References: John 14:28, John 6:46 (if Jesus was God, then everyone looking at Jesus would have seen God, but he explicitly says that isn't the case), John 1:1 (the Word was WITH God)

      They also teach that there is an immortal soul of man, but it doesn't say that either. References: Ecclesiastes 9:5, Ezekiel 18:4 (refer to Romans 5:12 to understand that all man is sinful).

    152. Re:Back to the Future by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      For some strange reason, people have come to think of "God" as some deity's proper name.

      Because God wouldn't tell us God's proper name. When Moses asked "What should people call you?", God answered "I AM THAT I AM.

      So God's name is... Popeye?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    153. Re:Back to the Future by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      In a book or a movie, that would be unlikely. But never mind, I guess my joke didn't really work.

    154. Re:Back to the Future by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Maybe they don't like it because of the pictures of the naked kid?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    155. Re:Back to the Future by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You need books to teach/learn those skills, with the exception of rock stars and executives, of course.

    156. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "God" can be used like a last name. Look at the etymology of elohim.

    157. Re:Back to the Future by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Silly Catholics ... the feast Jesus participated in was a well-established ritual recognizing the eating of the Passover lamb to escape the angel of death during the plagues of Egypt. The speech Jesus was reciting was a normal part of the Passover except he switched out a few lines, inserting himself as the Passover lamb (despite having obviously cooked a real lamb).

      It seems obvious even on a cursory glance that he was making a nearly literal but very metaphoric statement -- he was going to act as the Passover lamb to prevent deaths as those original lambs had done back in Egypt by dying on a cross.

      Now whether you believe in all the spiritual and supernatural part of the story is up to you, but Jesus' statements at the time eventually being translated into the Catholic Church's view of the eating of the literal body and blood of the Christ is just disturbing.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    158. Re:Back to the Future by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The irony, it BUUUUURNS!

      Well, you're not supposed to iron your clothes when you're wearing them!

    159. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (anon since I've modded already)

      At least that's what it says in the bible

      No quite. In fact, the exact opposite.

      JigJag

    160. Re:Back to the Future by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      Admirable that you did some research, but if you were a little more astute you might have noticed that the article cites the source as a Facebook photo - which happens to be public, if you search for her name on Facebook.

      (And if that's not large enough, you can download the higher-resolution original, from the option in the gear menu.)

    161. Re:Back to the Future by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      What I meant is that there is nothing remotely pornographic about anything in Ender's Game. If you were talking about some other work of fiction, where there was at least that subtext, I might go with the socially ultra-conservative label, but this isn't even out of control conservatism, it is just someone who hasn't read the book.

    162. Re:Back to the Future by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      One of the funniest things I ever saw was the Saturday after Theo Guisel died, and Jessie Jackson was on Saturday Night Live. They had him read Green Eggs and Ham; damn but that was funny. Jackson's speeches all sound like Dr Suess anyway, that was priceless. Think I'll see if I can find it on YouTube...

    163. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lying is not acceptable here ;) I've also been a librarian in three states and two other countries. In all three I've seen people want books banned. Some of those people considered themselves conservative, some have considered themselves progressive, and some have been liberal.

      ALL librarians are censors. We HAVE to be. Books get old and warn out. They have to be removed from the collection. I'm not arguing with censorship of that form.

      Some librarians are censors: "No writing in the books allowed!" I liked a librarian (in another country - I wasn't a librarian at that library): she had a notice up that encouraged people to put notes in books (in pencil, please, and only in the margins) if you thought it might be useful to other readers. She specified several suggested reasons, stating that her list was not intended to be exhaustive. It's been several years, so I don't remember the details, but here were a couple of her suggestions: to point to another book that covered the same topic; to reinforce an opinion or disagree with the one presented; to let people know you appreciated what the author said. She also had a short list of things she discouraged, the only two of which I remember was (in today's terms: this was before Gore invented the internet) no flame wars in her books, please!; and no permanent additions (eg, pens), nor deletions (erasing) except by her: let her know if there were too many marginal comments & she'd consider erasing what looked like the oldest.

      So, I have nothing against censorship per se. Sometimes it is needed for practical reasons. I have lots of books. I won't buy the so-called trade paperbacks because I want my fiction books to fit on my fiction shelves here at home, so I buy only the regular (mis-named pocket) paperbacks. And I'll buy them used. Yes, sometimes it's practiced for the wrong reasons. I've known several liberals who are against used bookstores because the person can get books without the author getting his royalty. Yes, the one works for the RIAA. ffflala is probably in lala land claiming she's never heard of liberals censoring. EVERYBODY does, whether they've taken time to realize it or not. You see less of it in my home; with several thousands of books, you'll see everything - except I really do decide that my paycheck (and wife) won't allow me to buy that book. Aww, if I could only live in the LOC.

    164. Re:Back to the Future by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see "book burning" is alive and well in America. I guess that's what the conservatives mean by restoring America.

      It is. Here's what a Pastor said while introducing Rick Santorum two days ago:

      "This nation was founded as a Christian nation...there's only one God and his name is Jesus. I'm tired of people telling me that I can't say those words. [...] If you don't love America and you don't like the way we do things, I've got one thing to say -- Get out! We don't worship Buddha. I said we don't worship Buddha. We don't worship Mohammed. We don't worship Allah. We worship God. We worship God's son Jesus Christ."

      So there you have it. Santorum didn't object at the time, either.

      His historical and theological inaccuracy aside, the ironic thing is, depending on the pastor's faith, it may very well consider Catholics, and thus Santorum, as not being true Christians, for example, due to fundamental differences in how they interpret the Bible.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    165. Re:Back to the Future by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see "book burning" is alive and well in America. I guess that's what the conservatives mean by restoring America. Now we just need to find some really cheap labor.

      Mindless tribalism makes everything worse. You can do better.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    166. Re:Back to the Future by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Why not, where do you think this is coming from? Read this [forbes.com]:

              The Daily Caller flags a little-discussed position paper on Rick Santorum's campaign

      Rick Santorum isn't a conservative, by a long shot. He's a nasty breed of misunderstanding of Catholicism in particular and Christianity in general with a big authoritarian stream and a bit of insane theocratic assholery to go with it.

      He said the other day he's proud the Republians aren't the party of small government anymore, and that people who think that way should vote for Ron Paul.

      Now, some dumb voters say he's "The Conservative" but there's nothing to indicate that being true.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    167. Re:Back to the Future by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      the Catholic Church's view of the eating of the literal body and blood of the Christ is just disturbing.

      Eating the God is a fairly common meme thoughtout the world's religious history.

      Early Catholicism was a mashup of lots of religious tendencies, layerd on the Jesus story, with politicial and power rationales added for the sake of a mixed church/state government.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    168. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like printed books a lot, but if they all become electronic on an iPad or Kindle, it is going to be rather hard to burn them without throwing all technology under the bus. I wonder when Farenheit 451 will be burned.

    169. Re:Back to the Future by John+Bayko · · Score: 1

      Rewriting the sage words of Mark Twain is a greater sin than burning his work. And anyone who claims Huck Finn is racist hasn't read the fucking book (or is too stupid to understand the entire point of the story).

      Actually, that is the reason given for the changes. Specifically, the language is "known" to be so racist that it puts people off of reading it (and parents prevent their children as well). A "safe" version would remove that tabboo and more people would read it and realise it's not racist. The original still exists, for those who, now knowing better, want to read it and see what the difference is.

    170. Re:Back to the Future by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which label he represents or co-opted, but what bothers me is how many people hear what he says - and like it. Whatever he is, he isn't alone.

    171. Re:Back to the Future by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I actually kind of wish the DoJ would go after the porn industry. That way they'd be too busy to support the RIAA/MPAA and still get laughed out of court.

    172. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how they never seem to refer to Jesus as the bastard son of God....

    173. Re:Back to the Future by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      The most obvious indicator of impending societal failure is your complete inability to read the article and understand it. She wasn't fired at all. Some parents withdrew their kids from her class.

      Virg

    174. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, unfortunately once you've fully-staffed every McDonalds and dug ditches across every square inch of dirt you can find, you'll still have a lot of people left over, and they're not much good at the interesting jobs.

      I sure hope more people read "A Message to Garcia", preferably before they graduate: http://www.birdsnest.com/garcia.htm

    175. Re:Back to the Future by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which label he represents or co-opted, but what bothers me is how many people hear what he says - and like it. Whatever he is, he isn't alone.

      Oh, quite right, and those kind of people were the type the US Founders were afraid of.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    176. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    177. Re:Back to the Future by OwMyBrain · · Score: 1

      Other banned books from the past:
      Fahrenheit 451

      Wait! Really!? Are you sure this wasn't some clever demonstration of Irony?

    178. Re:Back to the Future by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      If "there is only one god and his name is jesus", then why are they worshiping "god's son jesus christ"...

      That was an accident with a contraceptive and a time machine.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    179. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you!

    180. Re:Back to the Future by mandelbr0t · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side... At least people are learning to use Google.

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    181. Re:Back to the Future by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is the reason given for the changes. Specifically, the language is "known" to be so unchristian that it puts people off of reading it (and parents prevent their children as well). A "safe" version would remove that tabboo and more people would read it and realise it's not unchristian. The original still exists, for those who, now knowing better, want to read it and see what the difference is.

      Do you see how stupid that sounds?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    182. Re:Back to the Future by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      "Now whether you believe in all the spiritual and supernatural part of the story is up to you, but Jesus' statements at the time eventually being translated into the Catholic Church's view of the eating of the literal body and blood of the Christ is just disturbing."

      It's clear that whoever started the early Christian church practices actually made one giant screwup: why is it that the 'wafer' aka the matzoh (dry flat dreary cracker) is associated with the Flesh Of Jesus, when it's obvious from common sense and the historical relation to Passover, that Jesus himself was talking about the ritual lamb?

      Instead of lining up for a dreadful wheat thin, all those Christians should have been getting tasty BBQ every weekend from their priest. That would sure pack the pews. All along through the service everybody would be smelling it being prepared in back. Licking their lips and waiting for Eatin' Jesus Time.

      Maybe they wouldn't even have needed the Protestant Reformation and two hundred years of vicious warfare.

    183. Re:Back to the Future by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      As well as missing the fact that the female is like 8 years old...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    184. Re:Back to the Future by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It is a very good series, and contains many books to keep you busy for a decent amount of time. I read them back in middle school, but I still reread them as an adult.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender's_Game

      Wikipedia has more books than I was aware of being in the series.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    185. Re:Back to the Future by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      So, God impregnated his own mother? Who was also one of God's children? Man, no wonder inbred rednecks cling to the bible like a drowning man to a plank.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    186. Re:Back to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why of course there are political sides in the U.S....

      There are Demicans and Republicrats, and they are fiercely opposed!

  4. Heh, I just recommended this book by wjhoffman1983 · · Score: 2

    to my 55 year old mother in law. I hope she doesn't go in to cardiac arrest.

    1. Re:Heh, I just recommended this book by PIBM · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wasn't that your plan all along ???

    2. Re:Heh, I just recommended this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing remotely sexual in that book. The author is Mormon for Christ's sake(pun intended).

  5. Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm drawing a blank here but about the only thing I can think of that would qualify as close to pornography is the part where Ender beats the shit out of that bully and the book talks about how his medical sheet reads "bruised testicle." Which, if two adolescent boys bruising up each other's private parts arouses you in anyway, you are probably the one that needs help.

    The other possibility is that the book is too descriptive in some parts (maybe when Ender burrows into the giant's eye in the simulation?). And they're in ye olde Southern Cackalacky where the definition of pornography is just anything that gets too descriptive for their comfort. So, you know, like anything that's written well.

    Or perhaps one of the parents caught wind that Orson Scott Card is Mormon and different and therefore evil. And then they looked up the White Horse Prophecy and put ... wait, that's already far more reading and research than this individual is capable of.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      If that's the complaint, then good thing the teacher didn't read Ender's Shadow, with its visions of a naked kid crawling around in the station's ventilation system. That would warrant at least 25 to.

    2. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Informative

      As usual, this case has been discussed in other places first. IIRC the "bruised testicle" was part of what the bitching is about.

      We're in a bad spot in our society when these idiots aren't laughed out of the office. Let the freak homeschool her precious snowflake and stop being a burden on us.

    3. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is it was the scene where Ender and another bully at battle school are fighting in the hot, steamy showers in all the soapy, naked goodness that god gave them.

    4. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by rcuhljr · · Score: 1

      I followed three links deep and couldn't find anywhere that actually said what the 'pornography' claim is based on. I haven't read it since college but I can't think of anything that would fall under the term pornography.

    5. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      My memory is only so so, but there's also the bit about Ender complaining about the order not to wear "skins" (ie, run around in the nude) because one of the team members is female. The leader is a traditional Spaniard guy and Ender complains that everyone there isn't sexualized yet so it shouldn't matter.

      And remember, ANYTHING can sound dirty with the right inflection. Good luck proving it without a recording though.

    6. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      again you are asking for reason. Don't do that. It's unfashionable.

    7. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      When ender first gets to his dorm one of the boys is using his tablet to create a holographic genetalia.

    8. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      I agree, I have been wracking my brain to think of anything that could possibly be pornographic. It's possible that the parent is threatened by the thought of an alien species that is not "life as we know it" or "made in the image of god" or some other retarded bullshit but man really, it seems like this person should have bigger fish to fry than whether their kid is learning a little about science fiction.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    9. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      At one point two naked boys crawling around, one ending up in a position of obvious (to religious idiots) homoerotic bondage.

    10. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      yeah, i'm at a loss here. The only one that comes to mind is when Ender get's put in Bonzo's army and shares a shower with Petra (and the rest of the army). However, he's told not to do it again and that's it from then on. Jesus, Ender even says it's a stupid rule, she still looks like a boy.

      If you find their chit chat during a shower, or any of the dialogue after that as "pornographic" then you should not have nor be around children because you are a perv. Seriously, these kids are what, 7 or 8 at this point in the book? I really think some people are afraid to walk by the mirror after getting out of a shower because they might see "pornography".

    11. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I have not read it in a number of years but there is the fight scene in the showers, where they kids would be naked. Which is a fight, its not a sex act, so I would say its not pornographic. I do think there are some other references to nudity in the dorms at Battle School, again only pornographic if you already have a pretty perverse imagination about what say takes place in a mens locker room normally.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    12. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by i_ate_god · · Score: 2

      Wasn't there a lot of child nuditiy in Ender's Game?

      I haven't read the book in a while, but I remember thinking "that's going to be... a tricky movie to make" when there was news of a possible Ender's Game movie.

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    13. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by mikeru22 · · Score: 1

      Well, Ender sleeps naked and is described as taking his clothes off to go to bed. That's obviously what PORN is, right?! Some housewife needs something more productive to do with her free time...

      --
      Go study.
    14. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Remember, the enemy's pants are DOWN!"

    15. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps one of the parents caught wind that Orson Scott Card is Mormon and different and therefore evil.

      That was my guess. "Hey the guy that wrote that is a Mormon! Whatever he writes must be trying to convert our precious Christian children!!"

      Of course anyone who has read the book knows it doesn't have a Mormon perspective (let alone push one).. actually I don't remember any religious references, themes or any particular religious viewpoint.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    16. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the book is in the school library?

    17. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Teancum · · Score: 1

      There was a brief mention that Ender's mother was Mormon, but that because of the official government view towards religion she kept her religious views to herself and didn't even share them with her children. That was apparently one of the motivations for why Ender was born, as she did make the petition to have a third child (where most families in the novel only had one or two at the most due to extreme population control).

      Mostly though, you are correct that religious views were kept out of the book and even the whole book series. Orson Scott Card isn't shy about putting religion into his books, but in this instance it wasn't a major factor. "Speaker for the Dead" drew upon Mr. Card's experience as an LDS missionary who served in central Brazil, but that was mostly portraying a more realistic jungle environment and his use of the Portuguese language rather than religious imagery.

    18. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by RPGillespie · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps one of the parents caught wind that Orson Scott Card is Mormon and different and therefore evil. My thoughts exactly as soon as I read the article. They'd better pull Brandon Sanderson from the shelves too, just to be safe.

    19. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by santiagoanders · · Score: 1

      If that's the complaint, then good thing the teacher didn't read Songmaster, with its sodomy.

      --
      "There can be little doubt that union activities lead to continuous and progressive inflation." F. A. Hayek
    20. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by b1scuit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Any parent that thinks their kid hasn't drawn a penis, because penises are, in fact, hilarious, needs to go back to parenting school.

    21. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      "Remember, the enemy's pants are DOWN!"

      Generals have always advocated deep penetrations into the enemy's rear areas.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    22. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      As usual, this case has been discussed in other places first. IIRC the "bruised testicle" was part of what the bitching is about.

      Yes, because body parts are unnatural.

      Supposedly Spuds McKinzie was actually a female, so "he" wouldn't show a dangler in the commercials. (Especially with all the human females drooling over him in the commercials.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    23. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm drawing a blank here but about the only thing I can think of that would qualify as close to pornography is the part where Ender beats the shit out of that bully and the book talks about how his medical sheet reads "bruised testicle."

      After the teenager's mother contacted police, investigators contacted the school.
      School officials have since said two of the three books the teacher read were determined to have materials (primarily swear words) and, in some instances, subject matter and terminology that school administrators consider inappropriate for the middle school.

      According to commonsensemedia.org, which claims it has in-house staff and a team of reviewers who are experts in children's media, technology, health and policy matters, "this book was not originally intended for children. The violence is, at times, quite brutal, as kids kill other kids, though unintentionally, and the main character is admired for his ruthlessly efficient violence, though he himself is disturbed by it."
      The website also advises parents to be aware of violence, sex and language, but states that the content is appropriate for children 12 years or older.
      The student who gave a statement to the school is 14.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    24. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Wingfat · · Score: 0

      THEY ARE FILMING NOW!!! started on Feb 27th!!! and Harrison Ford is in it!!! sweet!!
      Ender's Game

    25. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by immaterial · · Score: 1

      Ender's mother was catholic, not Mormon.

    26. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wasn't there a lot of child nudity in Ender's Game?

      It's not a picture book. Any child nudity you saw while reading it (or listening to it in audiobook form or otherwise having it read to you) you produced yourself in your own mind.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    27. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by GmExtremacy · · Score: 0

      (primarily swear words)

      Oh, no! Words that are deemed "bad" for absolutely no reason! The horror!

      Possible sexuality and/or nudity! The horror!

      Everything is corrupting our children!

    28. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Giving people the idea that you can make your own porn definitely falls into the category "likely to deprave and corrupt!" (The legal definition of porn in the UK). What is more depraved and corrupted than thinking for yourself!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    29. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps one of the parents caught wind that Orson Scott Card is Mormon and different and therefore evil.

      Maybe this is a proxy war for the social conservatives' preference for Santorum over Romney?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    30. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      So... he should teach age appropriate material to children... except this lady's children... who should be treated like they're at least 3 years behind everyone else.
      Got it.

    31. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Duhavid · · Score: 3, Informative

      In "Princess of Mars" ( book ), Dejah Thoris was described as naked except for a few ornamental items.
      In the "John Carter" movie, she was clothed through the whole movie. They can find a way to handle it.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    32. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Zordak · · Score: 1

      Ender's father was Catholic. His mother was Mormon.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    33. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by mariox19 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what in the book fits the definition of pornography, but try to keep in mind that there are people out there who use language in a very impressionistic way.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    34. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I had an uncle that wore a swimsuit in the bathtub.

      To keep him from looking down on the unemployed.

      Attribution: Benny Hill

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    35. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe if she had been naked except for a few ornamental items the movie wouldn't have lost so much money.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    36. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The freaks HAVE been homeschooling their snowflakes for generations now. How do you think they got so fragile and out of touch with reality?
      The problem is these delusional people have taken over the Republican party. I don't know why Republicans are so mentally feeble that religious fools were able to take leadership.

    37. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by EdIII · · Score: 0

      again only pornographic if you already have a pretty perverse imagination about what say takes place in a mens locker room normally.

      Which begs the question*, if she objects to passages in a book talking about a mens/boys locker room why would she not object to a real boys locker room?

      One is just talking about it, while the other is the actual environment. WTF?

      * Excellent bait for Grammar Nazis. Try it.

    38. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I think that's the problem these people have with it. They are equating any sort of nudity to pornography. Anybody with sense would have laughed the outraged parents out of the room, unfortunately many regions in the U.S. are just repressed enough for it to be an issue...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    39. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the early part of the book, when the government agent (forgot the characters name) was talking to Ender about leaving his family to go to battle school, there is a discussion about how Enders parents are clinging to outdated (and outlawed?) religious beliefs on having large families (by having a third.)

      Beyond that, I don't remember much discussion on religion either.

    40. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by davewoods · · Score: 1

      who should be treated like they're at least 3 years behind everyone else.

      I think you mean at most 3 years.

      My parents are very very conservative, so when it came for things that they thought were inappropriate in school, they just had me go to study hall for that section. One thing in particular was the section on sex ed, I never went to a single sex ed class because my parents did not want the school system to teach me. I do not know their reasons, but they never flipped out over anything like that as the "Concerned parent" did.

      I remember seeing a movie in a Freshman English class that had very brief nudity, and I personally complained to the teacher that my parents would not have been happy to know that we were watching that movie, then I went to study hall for the remainder of the movie. No harm done, all it takes is someone being sensible. The teacher thought it would be fine, I am sure nothing bad came of it, and the only person that was unhappy removed himself from the equation. Everyone wins!

      I do not know what I lost by not going to the sex ed classes (I turned out fairly alright), but it seems like the kids have a lot more to lose if "Concerned parent" thought Ender's Game was inappropriate for her 14 year old... I kinda wonder what else she would remove from their curriculum if given the option.

    41. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by houghi · · Score: 1

      Why punish the kid? Kids are take away for less abuse then this.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    42. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also the bit where Petra is naked while she talks to Ender for the first time, and a few other random mentions of nudity. The lack of gender segregated sleeping/shower facilities might also be relevant.

      It takes a pretty broad definition of "pornographic" to apply, but remember the characters are like 8 years old so the same minds that brought us the "any picture of a nude child is child pornography" concept may be at work here.

    43. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they didn't spend 100 million on some of the worst movie advertising ever they would have made a decent movie.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, they where allowed to have a third child because his brother scored off the charts, but wan't stable enough. So the government allowed them to have a third child.

      And if you don't think Ender's Game has mormon influences, then you don't really know Mormons.

      "Look, the big bad government won't let us have all the children we don't want". I understand not seeing the subtler stuff, but that? p

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    45. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by geekoid · · Score: 1

      (I turned out fairly alright)

      uh-huh. And if you weren't? how would you know?
      I think I am a lot more supportive of my wife's period and cramps because I know what's going on. I knew more about condoms and what they can and can't prevent.

      We have kids engaged in rampant anal and oral sex because they have not bee taught correct safety. The think Vagina penetration is the only way to get a disease.

      " I do not know their reasons, "
      because keeping you ignorant is better then answering pesky questions.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    46. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I, for one, would not mind walking around nude (assuming the weather wasn't particularly cold).

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    47. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This calls for an HBO re-make!

    48. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by dbIII · · Score: 1

      "The violence is, at times, quite brutal, as kids kill other kids, though unintentionally, and the main character is admired for his ruthlessly efficient violence, though he himself is disturbed by it."

      The sort of postwar adventure short stories I read as assigned class reading in my first few years of school could be described as that and just about everyone in the class loved them. The newer books were watered down and bland so the old reading books were used until they fell apart and then glued up again. In high school kids were bored at the idea of Shakespear but lost that boredom when shown the gore of MacBeth and King Lear.

    49. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by davewoods · · Score: 1

      uh-huh. And if you weren't? how would you know?

      Haha, touche salesman, touche.

      Most likely you are right on all accounts. I do often wonder what everything would be like if I was raised by different parents, ones who taught me everything my current parents refused to.

    50. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      who should be treated like they're at least 3 years behind everyone else.

      I think you mean at most 3 years.

      Uh... no?

      If the book was labeled as safe for 12 and older, and the students are 14, but this parent complained that he's showing them inappropriate material, that means that the teacher needed to treat her children as if they were 11 or younger.

      That's 3 or more years behind everyone else.

      If the teacher treated the conservative's kid at one grade level lower then the rest, he'd still be able to read Ender's Game to him, since he'd be treated as a 13 year old.

      And just so you know, I'm doing my very damned best not to make a snarky joke about conservatives and math.

    51. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by davewoods · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right, I read that part incorrectly in your OP.

      I was homeschooled for a bit too, so you can make fun of my math all you want, but unfortunately it was not my math skills that were lacking (This time), it was my reading comprehension. Go figure.

    52. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Your use of begging the question isn't for grammar Nazis, it's for logic Nazis. Begging the question is giving an answer that makes the questioner ask the same question again. It's a type of circular break in logic. That's why the turtles example is used.

      What you're describing is leading the discussion.

      Virg

    53. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, well I caught something. I am just not sure how to categorize you yet......

    54. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look at the number one recommendation on this site:

      http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/2450.Best_Children_s_Science_Fiction_Books

    55. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Since I replied with the correction because of your comment about it being grammar Nazi bait, I guess you could categorize me as a comedian. Whether that means I'm funny or not is an exercise for a different post.

      Virg

    56. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      If that is the case, than his father was Mormon, but that doesn't fit as his father was from Poland. I do believe the mother is Mormon.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    57. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pity aforementioned snowflake. She's going to need a lot of therapy at some point to function with the rest of society......unless she's already learned her mom is crazy in some spots and ignores her.

    58. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet these same parents probably dropped their kids off at the theater to watch The Hunger Games, which has tons of brutal kid-on-kid violence in a bleak dystopian landscape. The book is even more violent than the movie!

      Give The Hunger Games 30 years to become a "teen classic" series and you'll see it banned too.

    59. Re:Good Ole Southern Cackalacky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if Disney wasn't intentionally tanking the movie through poor marketing and PULLING THEIR OWN MOVIE FROM THEATERS in order to avoid taxation and use "Hollywood Accounting" to cook their books, the movie would not have lost so much money.

      They movie was a good story, even without naked ladies.

  6. if this... then whats next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    if this, then Shakespeare has got to go as well.

    1. Re:if this... then whats next by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      if this, then Shakespeare has got to go as well.

      Not to mention several books from The Old Testament.
      Idiots...

    2. Re:if this... then whats next by 228e2 · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful . . . .

      --
      Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
    3. Re:if this... then whats next by bmo · · Score: 2

      I would say that the entire Bible is harmful to the intellectually weak.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:if this... then whats next by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Yup.... Song of Solomon in particular. It amazes me to see some of these hardcore religious nuts try to defend that book at the same time wanting to get rid of "lewd books" like Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer.

      If anything, getting this book banned, particularly for that reason, should put Orson Scott Card in good company of other censored authors due to zealots who are clueless about the book or overly sensitive.

      I can't even imagine what this school district would have done with my high school literature teacher after we read "To Kill a Mockingbird" as a class. At least that book talked about a sex act, where I can't even imagine what reference is in "Ender's Game" other than the fact that Ender was born to a woman who conceived him naturally.

    5. Re:if this... then whats next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out the Judges, 1-2 Samuel, 1-2 Kings 1-2 Chronicles for some hardcore action movie stuff

    6. Re:if this... then whats next by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Eze 23:20!

    7. Re:if this... then whats next by Zordak · · Score: 1

      My favorite Old Testament story is when some youths mock Elisha's bald head, he curses them, and a she-bear comes out of the woods and tears them to pieces. DON'T MESS with Old Testament prophets. Those dudes were hard core.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    8. Re:if this... then whats next by Aryden · · Score: 1

      they can justify it in their minds because one is supposedly "the word of god" while the other is the perversion of man. Seriously, I grew up with these nutjobs and it's how they think.

    9. Re:if this... then whats next by Aryden · · Score: 1

      Honestly I just go with the whole "old man raped a teenage girl to beget a son after he, in a jealous rage, whipes the earth clean. Then, he commits his son to death to atone for the actions of other people. Commands his followers to give their earnings, time and demands they indoctrinate their children as well as others." Hell, if Obama had done any single one of those things, they'd have crucified him in the rose garden.

    10. Re:if this... then whats next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me to see some of these hardcore religious nuts try to defend that book at the same time wanting to get rid of "lewd books" like Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer.

      While I don't believe in banning books, and I've read all three of the ones you just mentioned, it'd be pretty easy for me to explain the difference between them, but frankly I don't feel like wasting the time to bother. Pearls before swine, and all that.

    11. Re:if this... then whats next by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      My favorite Old Testament story is when some youths mock Elisha's bald head, he curses them, and a she-bear comes out of the woods and tears them to pieces. DON'T MESS with Old Testament prophets. Those dudes were hard core.

      I like the passage where the Pharaoh wants to marry Moses' sister, only to be told she's actually his wife. So Moses has to come and explain why he's told everyone the woman is his sister. "Well, she's my wife *and* my sister ..."

      (I might have gotten the people wrong. It was *some* bigshot king, and *some* great Old Testament figure. Possibly Abraham.)

    12. Re:if this... then whats next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention several books from The Old Testament.

      If they read from the Old Testament they'd be fired for violating the separation of church and state. You just can't win if you're a teacher these days.

    13. Re:if this... then whats next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not teach The Old Testament either. I remember as a child feeling very awkward and sometimes quite terrible, when mention of nudity, incest, and genocide were all brought up during bible studies...

      I would much rather be read Ender's Game than The Bible, at least until I'm 18+.

    14. Re:if this... then whats next by DemonGenius · · Score: 1

      I loved Huck Finn as a teen, it's a great history lesson, and really highlights how people really are in society. I guess that's what the fuss is all about...

    15. Re:if this... then whats next by catman · · Score: 1

      Last two chapters of Judges - these are probably the "worst". Of course, Ezekiel 23 would have the parent throwing a fit.

    16. Re:if this... then whats next by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I would say you are a bigot.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:if this... then whats next by bmo · · Score: 1

      Reading the Bible without any sense of historical context leads to all sorts of stupid stuff, like the justification of holding slaves, stoning people for the littlest crimes, etc.

      If you are feeble minded, the Bible is poisonous.

      If this makes me a bigot, then so be it.

      --
      BMO

  7. For the Children by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 5, Funny

    The school district reports that the letters E, I, N, P, and S have been removed from the school curriculum after a parent complained her son was being exposed to gateway pornography.

    1. Re:For the Children by robably · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So no more penis, but also no spine.

    2. Re:For the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or Pines... such a good tree...

    3. Re:For the Children by bmxeroh · · Score: 1

      exactly.

      --
      Central Ohio Home Theater Installation - The Theater People
    4. Re:For the Children by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      You can't even SNIPE them for taking those letters.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:For the Children by Krau+Ming · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or Snipes... such a good actor...

    6. Re:For the Children by jandrese · · Score: 2

      And your forests will look so much duller in the winter with no PINES around.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:For the Children by milbournosphere · · Score: 1

      It's okay, I'm sure SNAPE will still find a way to ruin the kids' childhoods.

    8. Re:For the Children by istartedi · · Score: 2

      And they can't ask if the pen is mightier than the sword.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    9. Re:For the Children by janeuner · · Score: 1

      "H-y mom, today -- g-ogra-gy cla-- w- l-arn-d that Jack-o- -- th- ca--tol of M----------!

    10. Re:For the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The school district reports that the letters E, I, N, P, and S have been removed from the school curriculum after a parent complained her son was being exposed to gateway pornography.

      Also the set of integers shall proceed directly from 68 to 70 with no intervening integer.

    11. Re:For the Children by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Well, on the bright side, there will be no more NIPES on the lunch menu.

      I really hated the days they served NIPES in the cafeteria.

      But then there was that one weird kid who *loved* the NIPES. If I got to him first, I could trade him my NIPES for his canned pears or a half pint of milk.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    12. Re:For the Children by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I think you mean:
      "t' okay, 'm ur A wll tll fd a way to ru the kd' chldhood."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:For the Children by milbournosphere · · Score: 1

      Touché, sir. Touché.

    14. Re:For the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also won't learn how to snipe

    15. Re:For the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impressive.

      Jacob Roberson

    16. Re:For the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a lot of trees will be missing, too.

  8. WE HAVE GONE by DrGamez · · Score: 1

    TOO FAR.
    WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD TODAY?
    Please someone give this teacher a prize for reading Ender's Game to children, it was my favorite book and it brought (to my life) a way of thinking critically about my actions that I've never had cross my mind until reading it.

    1. Re:WE HAVE GONE by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "it was my favorite book"
      so? You're favorite book isn't a merit.

      I find it humorous that a parent getting angry about a mid level quality book being read is where you think we went too far.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:WE HAVE GONE by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry if I take pride in the things I enjoy.

      Even if you remove those "personal merits" there is no reason to bar the reading of Ender's Game to 14 year olds.

      Also I know it's the internet so you have to be edgy and cool but what was the point in bringing up the quality of the book? Who cares if it's a mid-level quality book or if it's pure harmless crap?

  9. There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ender is a school child who kicks another school child to death in the school bathroom. Nobody has any question that it's happened, but not much seems to happen to Ender because of it.

    Because of this particular scene in the book, I've always felt that it should not have been promoted as a children's book. I have also felt that Orson Scott Card is, IMO, unsavory for cooperating in promoting it as a children's book.

    1. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord, it's not a childrens book at all, no one's arguing that. The students being read to weren't exactly second-graders though.

    2. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hansel and Gretel shove a little old lady into on oven and broil her, and that's been broadly accepted as children's fare for two hundred years. A little justifiable homicide shouldn't be a big issue all of a sudden.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    3. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Saphati · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should black list Orson Scott Card and prevent him from being with 10 meters of a child. Let's prevent him from being alone with his grand children. Hey! This is America! We can just lock him up! Let's do that.

    4. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      Anonymous Coward wrote:

      Good lord, it's not a childrens book at all, no one's arguing that. The students being read to weren't exactly second-graders though.

      Go look in your bookstore children's section. Or even on lists of science fiction books recommended for children. I'm not kidding.

    5. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BULLIES SHOULD DIE, ON THE MOMENT OF ATTACK.

      The story tells of a bullies tries to kick down another student.

      If USA had more cases of Bullies die on there attack, USA would be a better place. MUCH BETTER!

    6. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by BagOBones · · Score: 2

      That makes if violent, not pornographic.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    7. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      I was thinking along the same lines, the violence in the book between school kids makes the book inappropriate for children. I can not, however, think of any scenes that qualify as pornographic. It may be that the school district does not consider it pornographic, but agrees with the judgement that it is inappropriate for children and suspended the teacher for that reason.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    8. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by AshPattern · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The bully was already dead when kicked. He hit his head accidentally on a knob.

      Time to read the book again :)

    9. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Niris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In middle schools all over California children are reading Of Mice and Men. The characters in that shoot a guy in the back of the head, fight, and drink. They also introduce Shakespeare during freshmen year of high school. We might as well ban reading and literature so that we can sink all types of education in America, not just math. WON'T ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!

    10. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      When I was in middle school, we watched movies like the Patriot as part of class and we read books like Weasel... there's a lot more violence and fewer consequences in those than in Ender's Game. I thought Ender's Game put that scene, and Ender's own feelings about it, in a fairly realistic light.

    11. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by rcuhljr · · Score: 1

      Because it's a great children's book? I read it in third grade the first time.

    12. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Xeth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Card is certainly unsavory, but I am curious why you think it shouldn't be promoted as a young adult book. Many of those books involve violence, often without consequences (e.g The Lottery short story). I personally think that scene makes a great discussion point; people should understand why Ender wasn't punished, and that could frame an interesting ethical discussion. I think the target audience for Ender's Game is old enough that they can understand that not everything that happens (in a book or reality) is just.

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    13. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      I read "1984" in the fifth grade. Is it a kid's book?

    14. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by SnarfQuest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I remember reading "Lord of the Flies" as a school assignment, as well as "The Jungle", and "Jude the Obscure".

      If those aren't banned yet, then I don't see why they would bother with such a tame offering as "Ender's Game".

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    15. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by chispito · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ender is a school child who kicks another school child to death in the school bathroom. Nobody has any question that it's happened, but not much seems to happen to Ender because of it.

      Because of this particular scene in the book, I've always felt that it should not have been promoted as a children's book. I have also felt that Orson Scott Card is, IMO, unsavory for cooperating in promoting it as a children's book.

      Spoiler alert: it's a pattern that foreshadows what happens at the end of the book. He lashes out in self defense against threats to his survival (or perceived threats) and immediately regrets it. It's not his fault that he kills. It is the fault of those who manipulate him and his peers so that these life-or-death conflicts keep occurring, without outside intervention.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    16. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will you do if all your problems aren't solved by the time you die?.

      Don't forget the violence.

    17. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by na1led · · Score: 2

      Let's also Ban Moby Dick, because the title has profanity!

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    18. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP is forgetting that violence is A-OK, it's sex -- or even just sex organs -- that are going to bring the downfall of society should children ever find out about them.

    19. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ender is a school child who kicks another school child to death in the school bathroom. Nobody has any question that it's happened, but not much seems to happen to Ender because of it.

      Nothing happens to Ender, legally--he's a child, and has been placed in that situation by the authorities, who are pretty much hoping for the response that they get. Later on (either at the end of Ender's Game, or in Ender's Shadow) it's revealed that Graff was indeed court-martialed for the deaths of both Bonzo and Stilson, though he is acquitted because of his statements that the war would have been lost if not for his actions in turning Ender into the weapon that humanity needed.

      Graff aside, Ender did most certainly suffer for those deaths, and the billions more that he caused. Mentally, emotionally, and, later, being equated to another Adolf Hitler by the very people he saved.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    20. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by rcuhljr · · Score: 1

      Yes? It's hardly inappropriate for any fifth graders who actually find it interesting to read.

    21. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read "1984" in the fifth grade. Is it a kid's book?

      Just the "face eating rats" part. The "illegal romantic attraction" part, that's only for adults.

    22. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by RichMan · · Score: 1

      The entire book is about Ender being trained to commit GENOCIDE !!!!

      He kills the kid because it is expected of him. The adults involved put both kids in that place and were expecting the outcome. Ender full understood what was happening and so did the adults and Ender was at least 3 levels of meta- into knowing that he knows that they know .....

      It was a required step in the training of the worlds super commander.

      Overall it is very less violent than Harry Potter, except it brings up some very big real world things like Genocide.

    23. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read "Ringworld" in fifth grade on summer vacation, and a judge threatened to give me to CPS.

    24. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agree on that part,,,,,should be rated as teen,,,at least 13 and up,,,,but pornography? That book is so far from sex,,,IT HURTS

    25. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Interesting
      We expose people of all ages in our society to violence that they are encouraged to perceive as normal, at least normal to experience as a voyeur rather than a participant. I don't think it's a good way to socialize anyone.

      We're about to be immersed in The Hunger Games, because of the movie. I haven't read that, and my 12-year-old has. He optimizes what he reads for a reading score web site that the school district uses, as it's 25% of his grade. So, you can consider that The Hunger Games in this case was recommended by the government!

    26. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tricky moral situations are essential for children's reading. Feeding children sanitized narratives only primes them to accept the sanitizied narratives that are fed to us by government and media. Expose children to grey moral areas early, and they will be better equipped to handle grey moral areas in life.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    27. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      IIRC, nothing much happens to Ender after the incident, but his superiors did not ignore it; there's some discussion about whether or not he should be punished. In the end there's not that much they can do to Ender if he is to continue his career as saviour of earth.

      Sure, you can have a discussion about whether or not this book is suitable for kids. Different schools may arrive at different conclusions, and I'm ok with those who decide against it removing it from the school library. But firing the teacher for reading it in class? That should only be the case if there had been any actual (mental) damage to the kids, and if the teacher in question made a gross misjudgment in reading them this book. I don't think that this is the case, by any remotely reasonable standard.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    28. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Wait until next year, when her child reads those.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    29. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by preaction · · Score: 1

      I believe, in Ender's own words, he just wanted to make sure nobody bothered him. He won the fight in such a way that nobody would want to fight him. He won every possible future fight. He is the kwisatz haderach!

    30. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Right because we don't want children to ever get the idea that while there may be consequences for their actions sometimes that not applied justly or universally. That never happens in the real world.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    31. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Canazza · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's more naked violent children in Lord of the Flies than there is in Enders Game.
      Read that at school when I was 14.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    32. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by ifrag · · Score: 1

      Overall it is very less violent than Harry Potter, except it brings up some very big real world things like Genocide.

      As an added bonus, Card has also not attempted to retcon anyone into a homosexual. Card rips Rowling

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    33. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      The bully was already dead when kicked. He hit his head accidentally on a knob.

      Time to read the book again :)

      You mean Ender didn't shoot first?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    34. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by avajcovec · · Score: 1

      The bully was already dead when kicked. He hit his head accidentally on a knob.

      Time to read the book again :)

      Well, you're right about needing to read the book again. The bully in the bathroom (Bonzo) died because Ender head-butted him in the nose and sent splinters into his brain (presumably). The bully at the beginning of the book (Stilson) died because Ender kicked him to death, including a blow to the face. I think maybe you're remembering the scene in Battlestar Galactica where the nasty officer from the other battlestar dies in a scuffle when his head hits a bolt on the wall.

    35. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      According to the news article linked to by this article, the child was 14. God help this little snowflake when they're reading Lord of the Flies in a year or two.

    36. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by forkfail · · Score: 1

      So - Lord of the Flies was mandatory reading for me in my freshman year, IIRC. And I think I benefited from that. Would you also ban that classic?

      --
      Check your premises.
    37. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      So? It's a book. It's not reality.

    38. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little old lady!! she was planning to eat them now snow white and the seven dwarfs now that is questionable.

    39. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      We expose people of all ages in our society to violence that they are encouraged to perceive as normal, at least normal to experience as a voyeur rather than a participant.

      Care to explain what real-world effects, if any, this has, and then prove it? Or is that just your opinion?

      I don't really believe that people believe books/movies/games are reality. I don't even believe they'd effectively desensitize (doesn't matter anyway) them if something actually happened.

    40. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read 1984 at 10yrs old, Stranger in a Strange Land at 9yrs old and The Martian Chronicles at 8yrs old. They are not children's books in the sense of being specifically written for child or adolescent readers. I had to wait until I was 13 to read the Beauty books.

    41. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Ender is far too important to ruin his academic career with punishment. The one desperate hope of mankind, and that type of thing.

    42. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      A lot of the stories from Brothers Grimm were quite violent and vivid in their original forms. Somehow we survived this childhood trauma. I'm not sure how.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    43. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if we're lucky she'll ban her kids from reading.

    44. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Talking about Stilson?

      Ender is a school child who accidentally kicks another school child, who was the ringleader of a group of students who had decided to beat Ender up, to death in the school bathroom in an attempt to prevent further attacks by decisively beating the ringleader.

      Talking about Bonzo?

      Ender is a school child who ,in self defense, accidentally kicks another school child, who wants to kill Ender, to death in the school bathroom.

      In either case, FTFY.

      You have left off the accidental nature of the deaths, that Ender is six years old when he kills Stilson, the fact that both were matters of self-defense, that Ender felt remorse for both deaths, and that Ender specifically stated he never wanted to kill anyone. By virtue of Ender's age, the death of Stilson would probably not result in much happening that would show up in the book. The fact that the entire incident with Bonzo was filmed and that Ender was showing the very behavior Battle School was trying to groom would explain "not much happening" after Bonzo's death.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    45. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It isn't a childrens' book, it is aimed at kids over 12. These were 14 year olds. Do you have objections to fourteen year old kids seeing Star Wars Episode 3 (other than artistic, I mean)? You have a guy getting both of his hands chopped off before being beheaded, and in the end Darth Vader has all four extremities chopped off and left to die horribly in fire.

      Kicking someone to death who has been bullying you is worse?

      And I could very well have been Ender in the 7th grade if the gym teacher hadn't pulled me off of the bully I was savaging. I really wanted to kill the bastard, but it was unnecessary -- he didn't ever bother me again. And neither did anybody else.

    46. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by janeuner · · Score: 3, Funny

      STILSON SHOT FIRST

    47. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Xeth · · Score: 1

      I agree to a certain extent; we need to be careful what we portray as normal, because people will see it that way if it approaches saturation. But I feel the particular act in Ender's game we're talking about really wasn't seen that way. It wasn't something that happened regularly at Battle School, and I seem to recall it being very clear that Ender had done something wrong, and there were very particular reasons as to why he wasn't being punished (though my memory of the book is getting rather old).

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    48. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2

      Hello, children. Hello. Here is this morning's story. Are you ready? Then we'll begin.

      One day, Ricky the magic pixie went to visit Daisy Bumble in her tumble-down cottage. He found her in the bedroom. Roughly, he grabbed her heavy shoulders, pulling her down onto the bed and ripping off her--

      Old Nick the sea captain was a rough, tough, jolly sort of fellow. He loved the life of the sea, and he loved to hang out down by the pier, where the men dressed as ladies--

      Rumpletweezer ran the dinky-tinky shop in the foot of the magic oak tree by the wobbly dum-dum bush in the shade of the magic glade down in Dingly Dell. Here he sold contraceptives and--

      Discipline... naked... "with a melon"?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    49. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Aryden · · Score: 1

      There has to be a story there... you don't just appear before judges and tell them what you're reading or have read on a whim.

    50. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      It's the cumilative frequency of violent acts more than the context of the individual acts. If you watch them regularly, you get used to seeing them regularly.

      I am much less likely to watch a violent film than most people. It might be because I have other things to do, or because I'm at some level a gentile soul. Because I don't do watch this stuff so often, I am at times bothered when I do see it. The fact that people around me are inured to it seems weird and wrong.

    51. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

      I remember reading Lord of the Flies at 14 in school... There are a few very graphic scenes of violence in there, particularly when they first slaughter and kill the boar (which my teacher specifically described the scene as sexual in nature) and later when one of the kids dies.

      And we read To Kill a Mockingbird at 13, with all its barely veiled racism and mention of rape...

      And Fahrenheit 451 at 12...

      Well educated children should have no problems with these concepts. I have a cousin who is 13 and reading The Hunger Games in class, which is another dark story involving significant violence.

    52. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Mostly the effects I've seen on my own child have also been acted out in video games (and he's limited to what are supposed to be constructive games). Choices of some strategies that seem more violent than necessary. Enough that I decided to talk to him about it.

    53. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Hatta · · Score: 1

      In life, you will witness violence. Whether it's direct or indirect, we are all involved in violence in one way or the other. You can't properly socialize someone without addressing this fact.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    54. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was a coke-snorting hooligan judge who happened to see what I was reading in my parents shop.

    55. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      The academic importance of any written work is obviously NOT on S. Carolina's agenda. They couldn't care less. These people need to be brought into the 21st century some how. They need to understand that censorship is not ok, that a little sexual reference is not going to kill precious Johnny and Susie, but good luck with that.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    56. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly should he be punished? What he did was in self defence, had he not done so, he would have most likely either been crippled or killed in both fights.

    57. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoiler alert: it's a pattern that foreshadows what happens at the end of the book. He lashes out in self defense against threats to his survival (or perceived threats) and immediately regrets it. It's not his fault that he kills. It is the fault of those who manipulate him and his peers so that these life-or-death conflicts keep occurring, without outside intervention.

      Why should there be outside intervention? The correct way to deal with bullies is to beat the ever loving fecal matter out of them with your own two hands. People don't learn this lesson anymore and are led to believe that being wailed on is preferable to confrontation. Dad always taught me 'Never start a fight, EVER, but you damn well better finish it' and then proceeded to teach me how. I've passed this advice on to my daughter for her own safety.

      Funny thing about boys: they fight, then they often become good friends and respect each other.

    58. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by toriver · · Score: 1

      And the legacy of a certain president is improved if we stop referring to him as "Tricky Dick".

    59. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Well, sure. But I'd rather teach children to abhor it than enjoy it.

    60. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good way to deal with a bully. And it's probably also legal, since it was done in self defense. So why NOT read it to children? Might help discourage them from becoming bullies.

    61. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      a gentile soul

      Hm. Is that a Freudian slip, or just a typo...

    62. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by toriver · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      A young kid growing up in an oppressive family situation suddenly learns that he is one of a special class of children with special abilities

      Yes, I always wished Card would try and get away from that formula sometimes. Treason? Check. Ender's Game? Check. Homecoming? Check. Alvin Maker, even ignoring the Mormon references? Check. Wyrms? Guess so. Hart's Hope? Maybe both of the children, even though Beauty is an adult for most of the book.

    63. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Why exactly should he be punished? What he did was in self defence, had he not done so, he would have most likely either been crippled or killed in both fights.

      Well, it's a contrived fictional situation. My child has taken a class in how to physically defend himself from an adult. This included kicking a guy in a padded suit. If he was really in a fight with an adult, regardless of the merit, I'd get him some counseling.

    64. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by phlinn · · Score: 1

      It's been a while, but I'm not sure that it was a full retcon. I seem to recall at least some strong hints of it in book 6 or 7 when his history with Grindenwald is discussed.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    65. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good way to deal with a bully.

      Hm. Maybe we should teach them perspective instead.

    66. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by harl · · Score: 1

      The complaint is that the book is pornographic. How is the situation you describe "pornographic"?

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    67. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      So, anecdotal evidence, then? I've seen plenty of children that are perfectly fine playing games like Grand Theft Auto. Even extremely young ones. The key is often teaching them that they're not reality and they're not typically good things to turn to for life advice (if they don't already realize that).

      But different people are different. Some people may be effected negatively, and perhaps those ones should stay away from the games.

    68. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Obviously, it's not a scientific study. But I don't really want to know those folks who let extremely young children play GTA.

    69. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      I don't see why not. As I said, the kids are fine. They were taught from a very young age that video games do not represent reality.

    70. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by geekoid · · Score: 1

      define children. What a 3 year old should be reading and a 14 year old are wildly different..or at least should be.
      My daughter is 11, she is reading it for the second time.
      The writing is about where an average teen should be reading.

      When I was 11, I read these books, where some people steal a magic ring from someone, and instead of giving it to it's rightful owner, the killed the people who wanted it back, and then destroyed it. I mean, sure kicking people to death is bad, but people would show up to collect there lords rightful possession, and these other people would cut them down!

      And this thought occurred to me when I read you post:
      "Go look in your bookstore"
      A what store?
      books store
      A book what?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    71. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Tat's not a great metric. Do you know what I found interesting to read in 5th grade? my dads playboys.

      Also, Jaws.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    72. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And now you spend time reading /. and fighting trolls. See what happened?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    73. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate on the games they play, and examples of how they are more violent than necessary?

      From chess to Call of Duty, the objective of a game is to win. You don't (normally) win at chess by whittling down forces until the enemy decides they've had enough -- you corner them in a manner where they have no way out without death. (The actual 'kill' is basically N+2 moves away, and is implicit.) Many games only count a victory when you have wiped out the enemy, or razed all of their buildings (even the "farms").

    74. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't want to elaborate too much. It's about my kid, not a scientific subject. However, the game being played wasn't one of the zero-sum things you're referring to.

    75. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      It does : There is Ender's perspective, in which he has to defend himself from a bully that's likely to seriously injure him. And there's the bully's perspective, that hurting Ender is OK since he hurt his feelings.

      It even shows a perfectly reasonable result of those two perspectives : Bully accidentally dies.

    76. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bully was already dead when kicked. He hit his head accidentally on a knob.

      Ooooh... Gay Snuff Porn.

    77. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by ZombieThoughts · · Score: 1
      That was a thorough thrashing of Rowling.

      Definitely worth reading, someone mod this guy up.

    78. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Perhaps we need to stop reading kids Brothers Grimm, and start reading them Lovecraft.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    79. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Awesome sketch. Thanks for the reminder!

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    80. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 4yr old like to listen to Old Testament stories (kid's Bible). While reading them I sometimes censor certain passages because there's so much violence. However, when he's over 10 I would expect of him to be able to critically think therefore instead of censorship I hope for a discussion or at least Q and A.

    81. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      define 'socialize'.. that's a relatively new term in this context.. it's newspeak for 'bring into conformance.' School should be preparing kids for life, life where things aren't always happy rainbows and unicorns. One of the big reasons schools are failing nowadays is their curriculum is completely disconnected from reality. The things that are taught are the bottom barrel scrapes left over after every institution (mostly left, since they pay the bills, but some right too) and major lobby has had their veto say on what can pass through the pipe. This whitewashing of the truth serves no one in the long run.

    82. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The school should be commended for taking this action because Ender's Game is Bad Literature. It's shit.

    83. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Swampash · · Score: 1

      Spoiler alert: it's a pattern that foreshadows what happens at the end of the book. He lashes out in self defense against threats to his survival (or perceived threats) and immediately regrets it. It's not his fault that he kills. It is the fault of those who manipulate him and his peers so that these life-or-death conflicts keep occurring, without outside intervention.

      Exactly. I for one feel nothing but pity, and dare I say admiration for the unshakeable determination displayed by the young Adolf.

      ENDER. SHIT. ENDER.

      Sorry.

    84. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1

      Aaannd... GODWIN.

      You lose!

      Gooood day sir!

    85. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      When you say the Beauty books, do you mean the ones by Anna Sewell or Anne Rice. Both of which have been found in the children's section of our local library.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    86. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      There are no naked girls in Lord of the Flies. Though you could stir up trouble by mentioning naked boys eating each other...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    87. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post well deserves its mod of 5, Insightful.

      Sheltering children does them NO favours. Let them deal with as much as possible and only step in when they clearly can't cope. We don't learn as much from our successes as we do from our failures.

    88. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Queequeg and Ishmael also share a bed!

    89. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if he had a father with a better moral compass, this wouldn't be an issue. You know, a father who didn't try to defraud and steal from naive programmers.

    90. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      If he was really in a fight with an adult, regardless of the merit, I'd get him some counseling.

      As they did for Ender in the book. They took him to a house with a lake on Earth and let him heal, despite the fact that they were rapidly running out of time before the fleet arrived at the Bugger homeworld, and they still had more training they needed him to go through.

      Scott's other works are weird and sometimes disturbing. Ender's Game - and on a different level the other books in the series - actually opens a host of ethical discussions (interestingly, Ender's Game was just a prelude for The Hivequeen and the Hegemon, just written to establish the back story for the work Card was trying to create). I agree that there's an age group that this book is inappropriate for, but I don't think that extends to 14-year-olds as in this case. Those kids have certainly read other more disturbing classic literature by this point in English class; much of it with far less ethical / conversational merit.

    91. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't an accident. Ender struck the bully, killing him instantly.

    92. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      It is this foreshadowing that is the key to the point of the book. Ender is not in a regular "school". Ender is in military training with other children selected for their brilliance and potential ability to save the Earth in their war against the enemy. They are manipulating the children on purpose, looking for one that can excel at military strategy and find new insights in ways to kill the enemy. I won't spoil the ending for those that haven't read it, but they have been manipulating Ender and the others from the beginning and a few dead children along the way wouldn't be a problem if it wins the war.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    93. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      I don't think the problem age borderline extends to 14-year-olds either. But it has been interesting/disquieting to see the trade-paperback-size version of Ender's Game with the kid in zero-G on the cover in children's sections of bookstores. It seems to me to be marketed to younger children than 14.

      It's also disquieting to converse here on Slashdot with people who think it's OK for young kids to use GTA If they are real.

    94. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      But it has been interesting/disquieting to see the trade-paperback-size version of Ender's Game with the kid in zero-G on the cover in children's sections of bookstores

      Ok, I'll agree if it's targeted at elementary school kids. Not that I think no elementary school kids are able to handle that book, but that should be up to their parents to meter according to their child's emotional maturity, which is a lot harder if marketing is making it look safe to 6-year-olds.

      Orson Scott Card has drawn a hard line with how the Ender series is portrayed. It's very important to him that Andrew Wiggin is portrayed as a 6 year old. That's a big part of the books for him. It's also the reason no Enders Game movies have been made, he refuses to budge on the age of the actors. According to Card, studios keep trying to trick him into agreeing to older actors, even with weasely language such as "Actor portraying Ender Wiggin to be 6 years of age," then later "Due to casting concerns, actual age of actors may vary by as much as 6 years," or some such. It's something he's refused to budge on, and he's been involved in movie discussions a few times; he immediately rejects any offer that offers to do anything but cast kids the age he says they ought to be.

      So that maybe offers some insight as to why he would allow it to be marketed at young kids (even though I know you don't agree with it, it's useful to understand the thinking). I think he might actually have written Ender's Game for small kids. He's got a certain fixation with youth and smallness in general, it shows up in a lot of his works. I think his belief is that we don't give enough credit to small kids.

      It's also disquieting to converse here on Slashdot with people who think it's OK for young kids to use GTA If they are real.

      Yeah, I agree pretty strongly on that. GTA and other games like it. I do think at certain maturity levels kids derive what's socially acceptable from their experiences in the world around them, and although it's unlikely that most kids would believe it's socially acceptable to beat a hooker to death, engaging in that simulated activity or seeing it glorified will still have some negative influence on their perspective outside the simulation.

      It's not a popular view around these parts, and I've certainly been modded down for voicing it, but I believe it's a good idea to give parents tools to control their children's access to certain kinds of material, including violent video games. These aren't a one-size-fits-all "no kid may play a violent video game under the age of X" kind of rule, just a "an adult should be involved in this decision" kind of rule.

      I also believe my kids don't have a right to Internet privacy in my house; I need to know if they're getting involved in certain things. Perhaps they'll earn privacy through trust, but it's not guaranteed. That view has gotten me modded down as well. My kids are only 22 months and 10 months old, so it'll be a little while before this becomes a real issue for me, but I can't see myself changing that view.

    95. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, would you then say that, as a matter of legal causation, that Ender's actions did not significantly contribute to his death?

    96. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my son's school the Librarian emailed us to ask if we were okay with it when our yr7 (1 week before 12th birthday) son went to book Lord of the Flies out of the school library. We said yes so they let him read it and that is as a persoanl reading book not as a class book (they will cover it in the yr9 English class)

    97. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      This does nothing to argue why the school board and the police shouldn't have reacted as they did... you're basically saying that it's good job security.

    98. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by camperdave · · Score: 1

      As I recall, Hansel and Gretel shoved a cannibalistic witch into an oven in an act of self defense.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    99. Re:There's this little problem with Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, comparing Ender to Hilter now counts as a Godwin? Look up some literary analysis of Ender's Game. The comparison is actually pretty common.

  10. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pornographic? Ah. I must have skipped that scene when Sasha Grey was killing the Bugs. Maybe the Mother confused the Starship Trooper movie with Ender's Game? Look, let's all just ban Huckleberry Finn and be done with it. Also, all the references to Fahrenheit 451 can suck my big left one. That was a boring movie.

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movie? Who said anything about movies? This is an article about books. Fahrenheit 451 is a book.

    2. Re:WTF? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Also, all the references to Fahrenheit 451 can suck my big left one. That was a boring movie.

      Never judge a book by its movie.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    3. Re:WTF? by BLToday · · Score: 1

      There was a movie? Fahrenheit 451 is one of those books that doesn't look like it would ever work as a movie.

      Of course, Equilibrium was basically the same premise and worked out well as a movie.

    4. Re:WTF? by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Indeed. F451 was a particularly sad book; even those who wanted to preserve the various writings they encountered burned them for their safety (after having memorized them).

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  11. What. The. Fuck. by Iamthecheese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who try to ban things "because someone might be offended" are themselves the problem. And it is a wide-spread and serious one.

    I only hope we can get over this state of permanent panic before it kills us.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:What. The. Fuck. by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      Does that mean I can dress up as Mohammad and feed my potbellied pig the Koran?

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    2. Re:What. The. Fuck. by Amouth · · Score: 1

      yes it does.. but i warn you others might not let you do it for long

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:What. The. Fuck. by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Probably. The Iranians will get upset. We'll probably be in a declared war with Iran before too long anyway. Look to S. Carolina to be the first to send their good 'ol boys over too.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    4. Re:What. The. Fuck. by DC2088 · · Score: 1

      Technically yes, but nobody said there wouldn't be social consequences outside of the law.

    5. Re:What. The. Fuck. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Go for it. Seriously, why not? Toss in a Bible and a math textbook while you're at it to make sure everyone has a reason to be offended. It's not your job to life a quiet, inoffensive life unless you choose to.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:What. The. Fuck. by lightknight · · Score: 1

      And yet I think these people would probably scream if you tried to ban the Bible.

      Violence is allowed, but only if YHWH is dealing it up old school.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    7. Re:What. The. Fuck. by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      I'd probably go with the Bible, Torah, and maybe Pale Blue Dot. I'm sure I could find a Hari Crishna and Sikh Bible while I was at it. If I wasn't married, the fun I could have....

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    8. Re:What. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are offended by people who want things banned, and because you're offended you wish they could be banned [they "are themselves the problem"].

      So far that's about what every one else on this board has said: ban the people that offend me because they want to ban the people [me] who offend them.

      You're just the one who was that blatantly hypocritical. Most have tried to couch it in different terms to hide their hypocrisy.

      Of course the board is designed for that [people who are to lazy to login aren't called Anonymous [that might be an honor], so they call them Anonymous Coward, which in effect is banning the people who might offend you from posting after they realize what they'll be called.

  12. Pornographic? by SJHillman · · Score: 0

    I finally got around to reading Ender's Game a few months ago. I don't remember anything remotely pornographic in it. Besides, it's middle school... around the same time most schools start sex ed anyway. At any rate, firing the teacher would be more than sufficient if the school decides it was a major no-no.. criminal charges is beyond ridiculous.

    1. Re:Pornographic? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At any rate, firing the teacher would be more than sufficient if the school decides it was a major no-no.. criminal charges is beyond ridiculous.

      Firing the teacher would be absurd, criminal charges would be truly insane. The former only seems in any way legitimate because of the total insanity of the latter - not for one second does a teacher deserve to lose their job for reading a perfectly innocuous (and pretty damn good, IMO) scifi novel to a class of 14 year olds.

    2. Re:Pornographic? by NEDHead · · Score: 2

      ASSUMPTION ALERT! As if we believe she can read. Actually raises the bigger question - middle school and the teacher was reading to the students? Can't they read yet themselves?

    3. Re:Pornographic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total absurdity. Ender's Game is my favorite book, and I let my 12 year old read it. He is 14 now and has read it 10 times. OMG, do you think he reads it for the pornography?!?! No, it is a wonderful book. I guarantee that the idiotic parents didn't read the book and probably think that someone steals your soul when they take a picture. The parents complaining and any school administrator who takes any disciplinary action should be taken to task on this one...

    4. Re:Pornographic? by Bigby · · Score: 1

      She should be fired for not having a class of teenagers read the book themselves. What a waste of class time...

    5. Re:Pornographic? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Firing the Principal for threatening to fire the teacher is the only reasonable measure here.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Pornographic? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      I take it 1st mendments rights were mentioned but quickly dismissed by the prosecutor as being simply a bump in the roadblock to justice in S. Carolina?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    7. Re:Pornographic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading to older children continues to help improve their accessible vocabulary and pronunciation as well as their listening skills. Hearing material read aloud regularly is beneficial to all age groups, and has been utilized as a valuable teaching method throughout history.

    8. Re:Pornographic? by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      I'm going to not RTFA or the comments, and finish the book.

      Too late, now you know the final chapter! :P

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
    9. Re:Pornographic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I can't remember anything in the book that could be considered pornographic. I read all three of them and then ... hold on to your hats. Gave them to my middle school aged child to read. Cards books are sort of hit and miss but these and the Hatrack River Books are well worth reading.

      G

  13. The USA is broken. It can't be fixed. by Saphati · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The USA is pathetic. I am glad I emigrated.

    1. Re:The USA is broken. It can't be fixed. by CubicleZombie · · Score: 1

      There are at least 3,141 school districts in the U.S. This is one of them.

      And "considering firing the teacher" ranges anywhere from "Most Likely" to "We're just saying this so the annoying parent will stop bothering us."

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:The USA is broken. It can't be fixed. by forkfail · · Score: 1

      There are at least 3,141 school districts in the U.S. This is one of them.

      Which means that there is an extremely high probability there's even worse.

      --
      Check your premises.
    3. Re:The USA is broken. It can't be fixed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you did too!

    4. Re:The USA is broken. It can't be fixed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are at least 3,141 school districts in the U.S. This is one of them.

      Nuh uh! That's the entire US education system in a nutshell. This is because that's all what the rest of the world sees from us in news reports. If there were OTHER school districts in the US, I'm certain we'd constantly hear about how good they are in the news, too, just like how we know schools from around the world are so much better than US schools on account of how we constantly hear them bragging about how much better they are. It's LOGIC, people!

    5. Re:The USA is broken. It can't be fixed. by Aryden · · Score: 1
      yet is indicative of not only the society in which we live, but the the beliefs of many of those school districts. As well as the political atmosphere. Have you even read or heard some of the stuff these guys running are saying? Shit, Santorum wants to ban hardcore porn

      "America is suffering a pandemic of harm from pornography," "Pornography is toxic to marriages and relationships. It contributes to misogyny and violence against women. It is a contributing factor to prostitution and sex trafficking."

      It's funny!

    6. Re:The USA is broken. It can't be fixed. by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      There are at least 3,141 school districts in the U.S. This is one of them.

      Yay for pi thousand!

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    7. Re:The USA is broken. It can't be fixed. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I doubt other countries are any better overall.. the push against individual liberty is a worldwide problem.

  14. It IS pornographic and should be BANNED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It shows society naked. That IS pornographic.
    It talks about relationships between siblings, teaches children to think critically, demonstrates adults can and do lie, shows how society is and can be manipulated by media and wont some please think of the children harmed by the reading of this terrible book !!!!

    1. Re:It IS pornographic and should be BANNED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 4yr old like to listen to Old Testament stories (kid's Bible). While reading them I sometimes censor certain passages because there's so much violence. However, when he's over 10 I would expect of him to be able to critically think therefore instead of censorship I hope for a discussion or at least Q and A.

    2. Re:It IS pornographic and should be BANNED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everything is lewd, when correctly viewed. I can tell you things about Peter Pan, and the Wizard of Oz (There's a dirty old man)"
                  - "Smut" by Tom Lehrer

  15. 'Murica.. fuck yeah!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is wrong with people? Are we going to have to resort to some sort of white list that kids will be able to read from?

    The school district's response: the customer is always right...

  16. Porn? by Sperbels · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was some violence in that book, yes. But was there anything sexually graphic? I can't think of anything. I don't even think there was an profanity. Can anyone think of anything that even comes close to being pornographic?

    1. Re:Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theres a scene where Ender is forced to fight naked in the shower, but the scene is something like 1 (paperback) page long (its practically a curb-stomp fight) and mentioned maybe once or twice after that before being dumbed down into a lesson of "you must KILL your enemies if you don't want them to hurt you!"

    2. Re:Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just barely read Ender's Game for the first time a few days ago. The only part I can think of is

      "Everybody erupted in laughter. It took Ender a moment to understand why. Rose had programmed his desk to display and animate a bigger-than-lifesize picture of male genitals, which waggled back and forth as Rose held the desk on his naked lap..."

      Not much of a reason to fire a teacher...

    3. Re:Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The kids in the barracks are always naked when not in uniform. Ender was told not to "skin" past the girl near the door (who was also always naked).

    4. Re:Porn? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I just re-read the book and it was hard to FAP to, but finally it worked.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have racked my brain for the answer.

      I am a MS teacher in an adjoining county, and we have had the book on our summer list for years.

      I've come to the conclusion that.....this is not about Ender's Game.

      It is about something else. There is no porn in Ender's Game.

      But even so, we will likely ban it soon, along with the other books. Bradbury's fantasy is coming to pass, one inch at a time.

    6. Re:Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pornographic? Not a chance. But the kids did tend to use a fair amount of profane language.

  17. Good times. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the public school system continues to show itself more and more worthless by the day... even to the point of actually becoming detrimental to your children's education. Good times.

  18. When I was in High School... by tekrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We read Candide. That's gotta be way more "pornographic" than Ender's Game. What is this country coming to?

    Between Santorum, Limbaugh and the rest of those jokers bible thumping their way into our bedrooms but refusing to even tax one cent of a rich person's income (because that's government intrusion), this country is really and truly fucked.

    We're going to be like Argentina, and the shooting in Florida is proving that there are now only gated communities and trailer parks -- and if you're the wrong color in a gated community, you are a target.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:When I was in High School... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      >> Between Santorum, Limbaugh and the rest of those jokers bible thumping their way into our bedrooms but refusing to even tax one cent of a rich person's income (because that's government intrusion), this country is really and truly fucked.

      You realize that Santorum and Limbaugh have never tried to "thump their way" into anyone's bedrooms. You made that up because you thought it sounded smart...

      And NOBODY is "refusing to even tax one cent of a rich person'd income."

      Even a cursory look at IRS data shows that to be a false paradigm.

      Do you always post nonsense and lies to Slashdot posts?

    2. Re:When I was in High School... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We're going to be like Argentina, and the shooting in Florida (...)

      Why Argentina? It's not particularly violent. Mexico would be a much more reasonable choice.

    3. Re:When I was in High School... by prehistoricman5 · · Score: 1

      I haven't read Candide, but all I can say is that when I was in High School I read The Handmaid's Tale.

      --
      Fuck Beta
    4. Re:When I was in High School... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Santorum has said that he wants to ban (hardcore) pornography. That's pretty thumping evil.
      http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/rick-santorum-wants-ban-hardcore-pornography-222833811.html

    5. Re:When I was in High School... by eht · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The bible is one of the most pornographic and violence filled books ever.

      Two of the more pornographic passages, yes the second one is incest, no it is not taken out of context in the least.

      Ezekiel 23:20
      There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

      Genesis 19:32
      Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.

    6. Re:When I was in High School... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Between Santorum, Limbaugh and the rest of those jokers bible thumping their way into our bedrooms

      I don't care much for Bill Maher, but he was spot-on when he said "even gay men don't think about gay sex as much as Rick Santorum does".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:When I was in High School... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I haven't read Candide, but all I can say is that when I was in High School I read The Handmaid's Tale.

      For us it was Canterbury Tales. We didn't read all of it, but when someone reported hearing that it was dirty the teacher said we shouldn't read The Miller's Tale, so of course everyone went home and read it that night.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:When I was in High School... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bible is one of the most pornographic and violence filled books ever.

      Two of the more pornographic passages, yes the second one is incest, no it is not taken out of context in the least.

      Ezekiel 23:20
      There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

      Genesis 19:32
      Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.

      Oh God, please let there be a well seeded torrent.

    9. Re:When I was in High School... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Was I the only one that read that as "bible HUMPING"?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    10. Re:When I was in High School... by marga · · Score: 1

      Argentina? I'm failing to see the parallel.

      There are some very dark times in Argentina's sort-of-recent history, when people against the government were illegally detained and made to disappear. However, that stopped with the return of democracy, almost 30 years ago.

      10 years ago, there was an incident of protests and violence, when the president then was forced to resign. However that was an isolated event, and probably not what you are aiming at.

      The current state of affairs regarding people thinking differently in the US has nothing to do with Argentina. Protestors here are not attacked by the police, their rights to protests are many and are respected. Any kind of repression like the one suffered by the Occupy movement would trigger governors/mayors resignations... Even maybe the president.

      --
      Margarita Manterola.
    11. Re:When I was in High School... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      We read Candide. That's gotta be way more "pornographic" than Ender's Game.

      Oh, that was burned in in the courtyard of the S. Carolina courthouse long ago. Lolita probably burned out the eyes of the state legislature there. Oh course ban all such books. We can't have blind bureaucrats running around bumping into people now, can we?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    12. Re:When I was in High School... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      Damn I thought you were trolling with that Ezekiel quote... maybe I need to read the Bible more!

    13. Re:When I was in High School... by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      Wow, you really drank the Cool-ade.Too bad you haven't bumbled upon any facts in your staggering crawl to suck on Obama's ass. The fact that the 1% that you are so upset about not paying their fair share of fed taxes are currently paying more than 1/3 of all taxes, while the lower 50% pay nothing. How is that not paying anything? It's just another Obama lie. You must be so proud of keeping his nether regions so sparkly cle

      "Fair share" is a term concocted by the conservative to twist the reality of the situation. Since a number of legislative rules have passed, more and more wealth has become concentrated into the hands of the wealthy few. When I say wealthy, I don't necessarily mean people making a 6 figure income, more so 7+. This would be known as the trickle up theory of economics. This is considered bad because it slows down the economy has a whole since fewer people can afford to purchase stuff and wealthy people don't necessarily spend it fast enough. You do make a semi-valid point that a large percentage of the population does not pay taxes, but this is because those people are at or just below the poverty line. Most of their income is being funneled into loans, groceries, and other necessities. The government doesn't tax them because it's not as effective as taxing the rich, percentage wise. You could tax several poor people at a rate of 30% but this probably wouldn't bring in the same income as taxing the mega rich at 1%. Logistically and ethically, taxing the poor would be bad PR, harder to accomplish, and wouldn't provide the same yield. (disclaimer: I'm biased towards returning the tax levels to Clinton-era levels, which is probably about a 3 percentage point hike to 39%).

      And why can't people protect themselves from intruders? I'll bet you haven't researched anything about the shooting beyond your hatred of "rich" people. If facts don't fit your hate filled template, you probably just ignore them. I guess you better loot and burn down all the stores in your area, like they did in the LA riots. That will prove that you can ... loot and burn down stores?

      People are certainly justified to protect themselves. But, the OP is referencing a story in which an individual went out of his way to stalk a teen boy and shoot him. Race may or may not have been an issue, but the situation certainly seems like it could have been avoidable on the shooter's part. The kid was simply carrying skittles and talking to his girlfriend on the phone. Also, the shooting did not take place on the shooter's property (maybe near it but not on it). All of this suggests that the shooter was not acting on self-defense. Maybe a jumped up sense of paranoia, but not self defense. Though, I'm sure more details will come to light when this goes to trial.

    14. Re:When I was in High School... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Won't you think of the paper cuts?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:When I was in High School... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      They believe, in some perverted way, that children are 'innocent.' Kids are innocent in that they do not know, necessarily, society's rules and requirements, but they are in no way innocent about just any number of things that society considers distasteful (murder, theft, sex, etc.).

      I know it's a faux pas to say that, but it needs to be said.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    16. Re:When I was in High School... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      And I had my father's anatomy books. To each his own.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    17. Re:When I was in High School... by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      Look up the Brick Testement!

    18. Re:When I was in High School... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Heck, it was my English teacher who told us we should read the Miller's Tale first.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    19. Re:When I was in High School... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh God, please let there be a well seeded torrent.

      Actually, he did. The Bible has been widely distributed in a peer-to-peer fashion.

    20. Re:When I was in High School... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      You left out Song of Solomon....
      When did we start thinking that avoiding discussion of primal urges was a healthy way to deal with them? This obviously was not an issue when the King James Bible was written....

  19. Pornographic? by Narnie · · Score: 1

    I recall violence and genocide but I can't recall anything pornographic. Unless reading shower scenes about soapy kids getting into bloody fist fights does it for you.

    I wish this woman bothered to read the book before ruining the teacher's life.

    --
    greed@All_Evils:~#
  20. Total failure in so many ways by jcrb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this is one of those things for which there is a simple solution, find name of parent, all Ender's fans call parent and explain what a complete and colossal idiot they are. Problem solved. News report of parent explaining how their phone didn't stop ringing for several months convinces all future such parents to just keep their opinions to themselves.

    "Pornography" is supposed to be judged by the standards of the "community", I think its time or the community to judge the standards of those who wish to judge the community.

    --
    -jon
    1. Re:Total failure in so many ways by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Pornography" is supposed to be judged by the standards of the "community"

      And that cop-out is the very antithesis of the idea of the rule of law.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Total failure in so many ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea! Just bully them into submission.

      Just don't blame me if you get killed in the shower later.

    3. Re:Total failure in so many ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Catering to the wishes of one isn't any way to establish law either.

    4. Re:Total failure in so many ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pornography" is supposed to be judged by the standards of the "community"

      And that cop-out is the very antithesis of the idea of the rule of law.

      You are mistaken, by that logic we need one law for the entire world. All nations much relinquish soverenty!

      The concept here is the law being decided at the local level, which is at least as good a level at the national level, or the world-level. Its completely outragous that the instructor may lose their job for this, but defining some laws at the local level is not the reason.

      If anyone wants to REALLY combat this, they need to go after the REALLY porngraphic, incest and sodomy-ridden, violence filed texts, and have them removed from the libraries of said institutions.

      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .

      I am, of course, refering to The Holy Bible.

  21. But the Murdering is fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is asexual nudity, but nothing that could be called pornographic. If I were a parent I might complain about the mass genocide or repeated hand-to-hand murders of and by children, but hey, people will complain about anything given the chance. (PS Im a big fan of the book, just pointing out the warped priorities of some parents.)

  22. Support the teacher by ccguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No wonder the educational system is going to shit since any parent can bully teachers. Seriously, if you're so annoyed about the teacher asking your kid to read any specific book then ask the teacher for an acceptable replacement (for your kid only of course). Or take your kid somewhere else. Or accept an F for that specific assignment.

    I wish principals grew a spine and supported their teachers on this kind of stuff.

    1. Re:Support the teacher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only Teachers had some type of organization, through which they could band together for mutual protection from this type of arbitrary behavior.

      I wonder what we might call it. A collaborative? A Joining? Maybe a.....union?

    2. Re:Support the teacher by Nimey · · Score: 2

      I think you'll find that not every school district has a teachers' union. This is no doubt more true the further one goes into the Deep South with the deep social disapproval of unions there.

      My wife, for instance, has been a high school teacher for over ten years and doesn't belong to a union.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  23. I haven't read it by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine what the problem could have been. I've only read one of the books in the series (Shadow Puppets) and that was tame to say the least. Anyone know for sure what could have been construed as pornographic? If it is a bit more 'grown-up' in general I might consider giving it a try!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
    1. Re:I haven't read it by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      I would highly recommend it... the first four books (Enders Game, Speaker for the Dead, Xenocide, and Children of the Mind) are much better than the later concurrent-sequel / whatever you would call them books.

      As for the original question... no, I cannot think of anything which could be remotely construed as pornographic; and I would rate myself as quite conservative when it comes to that sort of thing. Violence, mature situations, absolutely. I would say that it is appropriate for kids somewhere around 10 - 12+ years, depending on the child in question.

  24. Wow by Anrego · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bet this kid is popular.

    He's 14 and running home to mommy because a book had naughty words in it..

    I can see a parent running across the book and going full on "I'M A MOTHER, AND AS A MOTHER I FEEL.." mode while the kid stands there horribly embarrassed .. but for the kid to be the one who started it all... kid must be living in a bubble.

    1. Re:Wow by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      By 'naughty words' do you mean cursing/swearing? Some people seem to think swear words are pornographic despite the fact that they are not.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    2. Re:Wow by chispito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't blame the kid if the book made him uncomfortable. It's supposed to make you uncomfortable. It's the parents that overreacted.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    3. Re:Wow by bmo · · Score: 1

      He's 14

      And still in Middle School.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Wow by chispito · · Score: 3, Informative

      Middle School includes the 8th grade. You can turn 14 in the 8th grade and not be considered especially old for your grade. That translates to turning 18 when you graduate high school. It's common.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In quite a few school districts around the country "Middle School" (really in caps? it is not a proper name, you need to go back to middle school yourself) goes through 9th grade and high school doesn't start until the 10th grade. So yes, 14 and in middle school doesn't sound far fetched..

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and?

      Elementary School usually covers Kindergarten through 5th grade, now, right?
      Middle School is now 6th grade through 8th grade.
      High School is now 9th grade through 12th grade.

      (I think some places the 5th grade year gets tacked on to the Middle School.)

      The year a child goes in to kindergarten is also based on when, during the year, they turn 5 years old.

      So, assuming that a child was not held back or skipped forward any years, a 14 year old child could be in 8th or 9th grade.

    7. Re:Wow by vlm · · Score: 1

      In quite a few school districts around the country "Middle School" (really in caps? it is not a proper name, you need to go back to middle school yourself) goes through 9th grade and high school doesn't start until the 10th grade. So yes, 14 and in middle school doesn't sound far fetched..

      Been there, lived thru it. Eventually they built an additional high school and went to the 4-year high school program.

      I would agree that the "9th graders" seem to fit in better with the HS crowd than the middle school crowd, but if there's too many kids to fit in the building...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At 14 years, given the kid started school between 4 and 6, puts him between 8th and 10th grade. 8th grade is oerfectly normal for middle school, and 9th grade is included sometimes as well.

      Many schools now-adays segregate Middle and Highschool along different lines.

      1-5 as Elementary, 6-8 as Middle, and 9-12 as high (Lakeshore, MI)
      1-6 as Elementary, 7-9 as Middle, and 10-12 as high. (Not sure, heard of it)
      1-6 as Elementary, 7-8 as Middle, and 9-12 as high. (Benton Harbor, MI)

      That's not even considering schools where the *entirety* of the student population is in a single building. See: North Muskegon, MI.

    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than likely, the kid is lazy and looking for an excuse to remove a teacher or assignment and knows that (s)he has an over-reactive parent.

    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1-6 elementary, 7-9 Jr. High, 10-12 High school - where I grew up in Massachusetts in the 1970s.

    11. Re:Wow by archen · · Score: 1

      Bet this kid is popular.

      He's 14 and running home to mommy because a book had naughty words in it..

      I didn't see that in either summary. It's quite possible the parent asked the kid what they were doing in school, the kid mentioned the teacher reading a book to them, parent had never heard of the book so checked one out, then went into a tirade over it. Sounds like a lot of work, but the parent seems anal to begin with and likely one of the types that looks for reasons to get offended.

    12. Re:Wow by geekoid · · Score: 1

      and? 8th grade, probably. If he was born in January, that would be normal.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. RE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many uptight parents ruin things for other people.
    It's not like the kids are being indoctrinated.

  26. OSC Opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just curious to see if Orson has anything to say about this in his column this or next week... http://greensboro.rhinotimes.com/Articles-Columns-c-2012-03-14-211324.112113-John-Carter-Cowfish-Lights-ToshO.html

  27. I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

    I came across Ender's Game at a used collectibles place and started to read it. Maybe it's just me (yeah, go ahead and say it), but I read the first several pages and just couldn't get into the story. My interest wasn't piqued.

    Having said that, I picked up Ringworld at a library sale (50 cents) and it took until page 68 for me to get involved with the story.

    Maybe the same thing with EG. Comments? Suggestions? Flames? Heresy attacks?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  28. Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by cicatrix1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check out some of the comments on the source article. There are claims he was not really reading Ender's Game, and that the school is covering it up.

    --

    I know more than you drink.
    1. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by djl4570 · · Score: 1

      ...And the head coach wants no sissies
      so he reads to us from something called Ulysses
      :)

    2. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From another article:

      "One of the stories was about prostitutes having their faces covered with ejaculation."

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    3. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by MozeeToby · · Score: 0

      There is nothing in the linked article about any kind of cover up. It talks exclusively about Ender's game, only mentioning two "other books" in passing. The closest thing to a coverup mentioned is the parent filing a police complaint because the school didn't notify the police about "illegal activity". And if reading Ender's Game to 14 year old's is criminal then something is wrong with the world.

    4. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reading that article, they never actually say that it was Ender's Game that was pornographic but that it was one of several books under review and that one of the complaints was that one or more books might be pornographic in nature. Furthermore, that article mentions that it is on several lists for books appropriate for children over 12 and the kid in question is 14. The only action the teacher didn't take was getting the books reviewed by the school board before reading them in class.

    5. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, I really have to say.. its the fucking dumbest cover up I've heard of.. if the complaint is valid (I'm uh.. waiting to be convinced shall we say) then covering up what the teacher was actually reading with Ender's Game is going to fail basically immediately. Hence all the confusion here on slashdot, where quite a few of us have read the story. We're all wondering where the pornography was. If you're going to go to the bother of a cover up, at least find something with some sex in the book. Its not that difficult.

      More plausible, Ender's Game is the only one of the three books of any note and that's why its the one catching the spotlight in the story. Even though Ender's Game is far more tame than the last PG-13 film that all those precious flowers saw, on mommy's dime.

      I like how they quote some douchebag who says that it isn't appropriate for children because of kids killing kids and Ender being admired for his ruthlessly efficient violence. Apparently he didn't read the book I read. Ender kills 2 boys, is psychologically tormented by it ... and isn't admired by anyone for it. He DOES catch admiration for winning the zero-G sport of battle school, basically like the jocks on, say, a middle school sports team. Compared to say, Iron Man, where some rich playboy jerk causes a bunch of property damage, kills a few people, gets a bunch (more) of (free) media exposure, keeps his vast wealth, and the girl.

    6. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by Teancum · · Score: 1

      If the teacher brought in some real porn, why didn't the reporters and even the school district mention that instead of trying to drag Orson Scott Card's name through mud? If anything, that might just set up a libel suit that should be followed for that reason alone where something is being factually asserted which is patently false.

    7. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by Maow · · Score: 1

      Check out some of the comments on the source article. There are claims he was not really reading Ender's Game, and that the school is covering it up.

      Sure the claims were made, but... from what I saw it seemed completely baseless:

      Do you know that Ender's Game was in fact the book that was read?

      Answer: no, does she ("Lori") know it wasn't Ender's Game? Or what it might have otherwise been?

      Then there's this, from "VeryConcernedParent":

      my daughter has class with this teacher but was not in the class this occurred in. i talked to several students who were tho and they all said he was reading from the internet. one student even mention a nook he always brings daily as well as my daughter says he bring his personal lap top as well. Mrs Jackie Barnwell should loose her job over her handeling of this.

      Aha - something more concrete: he might have been reading... from the Internet!!1! And calls for firing over it too. (From an apparently semi-literate "VeryConcernedParent" to boot, oh the irony.)

      So, thanks for the link to the story & comments, but I saw nothing indicating anything else was actually being read, just wild speculation.

    8. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by Snufu · · Score: 1

      Look, if it gets kids reading, mission accomplished.

    9. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From another article:

      "One of the stories was about prostitutes having their faces covered with ejaculation."

      Yes the concerned parent heard that from her daughter who heard it fro ma student NOT IN THE CLASS. I am sure its EXACTLY as it was said thru the grapevine of a school yard....Cause... kids don't lie..... really!

    10. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by Maow · · Score: 1

      (Replying to self...)

      From another link:

      According to the incident report, a teacher had been reading pornographic material from the Internet to the students in class. One of the stories was about prostitutes having their faces covered with ejaculation.

      If that were true, it would be career suicide. Seems pretty unlikely, would be shocked if it were true.

      We'll see...

      My guess: student fantasy mixed with a touch of reality (reality being "teacher read...", rest being fantasy).

    11. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by geekoid · · Score: 1

      My Guess: student said in appropriat thin at the dinner table, and blames the school. OTOH: He would be the first person to do something stupid that ended his career.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Maybe he wasn't really reading Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither of those two sources say that.

  29. Damn good that it is banned.. by CaptainOfSpray · · Score: 1

    especially for being pornographic. That guarantees lots of kids will read it. Since it's slightly better written than most other trash kids read, maybe the ban will have a [slight] positive outcome.

    --
    "Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. This sig is intended to clog filters and annoy do-gooders
    1. Re:Damn good that it is banned.. by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Seriously. The more taboo a book is, the more the greater portion of the populace is motivated to get a copy.

      If you created a book that was banned in every country, and it's sole copy kept under lock and guard, you'd have supervillains planning to break in and steal it. Banning a book is the equivalent of shouting that it's the most totally awesome thing ever written; might as well dress it up in gold and diamonds, and package it with a Playstation 5 or something.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  30. My, how things have changed... by GlennC · · Score: 1

    I recall reading the original short story in middle school. It was in one of those "Weekly Reader" type magazines that apparently aren't around any more. Then again, I grew up in suburban Chicago, which is definitely different from the South.

    As a sixth grader, I found the story interesting. When I read the novel as an adult, I was rather less impressed. I think that Card is much better with short stories than with novels.

    --
    Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
  31. Law of Unintended Consequences by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not too long ago, we had a similar issue here when a local religious fanatic (who home schools his children, BTW) demanded the local high school ban, among others, Kurt Vonnegut's classic Slaugherhouse V, claiming it too was pornographic in nature.

    The school ended up bowing to the holier-than-thou asshole and banned the book; however, doing so had the unexpected side effect of Slaughterhouse V becoming the most read book in the city of Republic. The Vonnegut Library even donated several hundred copies of the book to the local library, all of which were swiftly checked out.

    Experience tells me Ender's Game is about to become the most read book in Shofield, SC.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Law of Unintended Consequences by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      And so it goes.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:Law of Unintended Consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought it on my Kindle and will be reading it in bed tonight.

    3. Re:Law of Unintended Consequences by dd1968 · · Score: 2

      We home school our children in no small part due to the way that public schools here have become places where religious fundamentalism is taking over. Unlike many public schools around the country, we can actually teach our children the theory of evolution. Our children can read anything that we feel they have the maturity to handle. And so on.

      It is ironic to us that while home schooling used to be seen as a mechanism for right-wing religious fanatics to indoctrinate their children it is increasingly embraced by left-wing wackos like us who want their children to learn everything they can and who are repulsed by book banning and other forms of legislated censorship.

    4. Re:Law of Unintended Consequences by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      For the record, I was by no means attempting to denigrate the practice of home schooling; much to the contrary, as a products of the public school system ourselves, the wife and I have agreed that if we were to have children, one of us would be staying home to tend to their education.

      My point of broaching the topic in this case was to point out the irony of how the fundamentalist forcing his viewpoint on the public school doesn't actually have any offspring attending it.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Law of Unintended Consequences by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't surprise me at all that this happened in Republic (I grew up in Springfield). What does kind of shock and disappoint me was that said jackass is a professor at SMS. Calling for academic censorship seems like a good reason for tenure (and PhD) to be revoked.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Law of Unintended Consequences by dd1968 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the follow-up. I wasn't reading more into your post than you intended but I should have summed up in my own post....it is indeed ironic that the idiot could foist his beliefs upon a school system he doesn't participate in (except, I guess, as a tax payer). Unfortunately, the fundamentalists seem to be increasing in number or at least they seem increasingly successful in changing systems to fit their world views. I wonder how long it will be before we are told what we can and can't teach in our own home...

    7. Re:Law of Unintended Consequences by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      This comment resonates with me. My wife and I are strongly considering home schooling for reasons such as this. Plus, with the dumbing down the curriculum for the idiots and trying to purge any thinking from the children so they turn into good little followers, it is either home school or private school. I too find it ironic that home school and private school used to be a primarily religious wacko thing, but as the education in this country falls to sub-standard levels it has become the only sensible option for a child that is brighter than the average dim-wit out there.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    8. Re:Law of Unintended Consequences by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the follow-up

      Always glad to perpetuate an intellectual conversation!

      it is indeed ironic that the idiot could foist his beliefs upon a school system he doesn't participate in (except, I guess, as a tax payer).

      ... Which was my argument exaclty: if we are going to allow this individual to influence the education of local children just because "his taxes" pay for it, what's to stop every other pedophile* in the area from demanding the same right?

      * I say "other" pedophiles because in his complaint, Scroggins claimed the book Speak was pornographic; pornography is defined as "material of a non-artistic nature which is designed to cause sexual arousal," and thus only a pervert would find a book about a teenage girl being repeatedly raped to be "sexually arousing."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  32. It must be . . . by baudilus · · Score: 1

    . . .the shower fight scene - that's the only point in the book that could be construed as even remotely pornographic. The word itself means 'designed to arouse lust.' At any rate, I think the parents in this case should justify their complaint with the offending excerpt from the book and explain why they think it's worthy of jail time. I just can't imagine that the school board and / or police department wouldn't do their due diligence.

    1. Re:It must be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, Rose the Nose's computer/table had his swinging testicles as a background. Though that's not very erotic, either.

  33. Cmon, what would anyone expect? by E_Ron.Eous · · Score: 0

    It's in South Carolina, reading isn't nearly as important as football.

  34. Obligatory by bmo · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Das war ein Vorspiel nur, dort wo man Bucher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen."

    "That was but a prelude; where they burn books, they will ultimately burn people also." - Heinrich Heine "Almansor" 1821

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interesting you used that quote. "Vorspiel" can be translated as foreplay as well.

    2. Re:Obligatory by bmo · · Score: 1

      That brings a whole new level of '"ick" to the concept.

      --
      BMO

  35. Was there 3 books or one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read an artice about this here http://geeks.thedailywh.at/2012/03/15/geek-news-classroom-controversy-of-the-day/, and it said there was three books that were read and the Enders Game was the only one that was known that the teacher read. So it's possible that something inappropriate was read to the children if that story wasn't off.

    1. Re:Was there 3 books or one? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that a Slashdot story was sensationalized? Was written specifically to drive nerd rage?

      You have *got* to be new here.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Was there 3 books or one? by alexo · · Score: 1

      "According to the incident report, a teacher had been reading pornographic material from the Internet to the students in class. One of the stories was about prostitutes having their faces covered with ejaculation."
      -- http://www.wrdw.com/home/headlines/142658256.html

  36. Ban Biology Class Too by na1led · · Score: 1

    We all know that there is some partial nudity in Biology Class, so might as well go across the board and ban half of what the schools teach!

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Ban Biology Class Too by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      They do try to ban portions of biology class already.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Ban Biology Class Too by lightknight · · Score: 1

      That's frightening. Biology, at least in my experience, is the first true science class anyone is taught.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  37. The day cannot get any weider by djl4570 · · Score: 1

    Sometimes you see or read something that you just know will be the weirdest thing that you see all day. The mention of Enders Game and Pornography in the same sentence did this for me today. I'm having flashbacks to my c1970 ninth grade science teacher dismissing Life Magazine as pornography. I suspect this is a tactic used by religious kooks to suppress anything they don't understand. Since they understand almost nothing the rest of the world becomes a pornocopia.

  38. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does start out admittedly slow, if you are expecting more of an action story. But its really a Tragedy/Drama type story, rather than the bug space epic you might expect at first.

  39. As punishment for supidity -- by RichMan · · Score: 1

    The parent should be required to read Lady Chatterly to class of 16 year olds.

    They are old enough to legally have sex, they should certainly be able to read about it.

    (( on another argument thread why are we so okay with violence (without the red stuff please) but not with sex which is required for out existance))

    1. Re:As punishment for supidity -- by dwye · · Score: 1

      The parent should be required to read Lady Chatterly to class of 16 year olds.

      They are old enough to legally have sex, they should certainly be able to read about it.

      Also, it they react to it like I did, it will put them off wanting sex for years. Seriously, those were the most intensely boring sex scenes that I have ever read.

      Fortunately, I had some Penthouse magazines back in my dorm room, to counteract Chatterley.

  40. Agatha Crhistie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That prurient Agatha:
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/03/20/south-carolina-teacher-suspended-for-enders-game-also-read-students-agatha-christie/

  41. Old News by prodigyx · · Score: 1

    This is almost a week old. Oh slashdot, how far you have fallen....

  42. teacher read to students? by pinkfalcon · · Score: 1

    I agree - Teacher should get reprimanded for reading that book to the students - middle school students are perfectly capable of reading on their own..

    On a serious note: The local High School Honors English class required the students read this book over summer break before school started. I gave my son the book and told him to read it even though it looks like he will be going to different school.

    --
    Real SUV's don't have cupholders
    It's 5:42 A.M., do you know where your stack pointer is?
  43. Poor kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I feel sorry for the kid. I remember what it was like having an ultraconservative parent who launched a Christian campaign against the school librarian. I didn't want to be in the center of that. I just wanted to get something interesting to read. Thankfully, I didn't shy away from my interests or libraries. I just learned to keep my books away from my idiot parent if I didn't want to be humiliated.

  44. google to the rescue by buddyglass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's one guy who thinks Ender's Game is porn, just not the "sex" kind.

    1. Re:google to the rescue by IMightB · · Score: 1

      If my skimming is accurate, this link is also, indirectly, claiming that Jesus == Porn, just not the sex kind.

  45. According to original report it wasn't Enders Game by dtolman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The original story reported it a bit differently:
    "According to the incident report, a teacher had been reading pornographic material from the Internet to the students in class. One of the stories was about prostitutes having their faces covered with ejaculation."

    ---

    Unless this is the writer's cut that my library didn't stock - this wasn't enders game they were reading.

  46. Enders Game : USMC Suggested Reading List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the most interesting things I discovered after reading it is that it's on the USMC professional / suggested reading lists. http://www.marines.mil/unit/tecom/mcu/grc/library/Pages/mcrl2.aspx

    For those who have not read it yet here is my 1 sentence book report for you. Its about individual achievement contrasted with self sacrifice for the purpose of building goal driven teams. It is an excellent read for any gamer IMHO.

  47. definition of graphic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    graphic:
    Adjective:
    Of or relating to visual art, esp. involving drawing, engraving, or lettering.

    Was this the picture book version?

  48. Pornographic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be the first to admit that some screwed up things happen in Ender's Game (like how Ender Keeps killing people and not much happens), but pornography? not so much.

  49. Better than book burning by MEK · · Score: 1

    this involves a demand for (at least virtual) teacher burning.

    MEK

    --
    Credo quia impossibilis -- Tertullian
  50. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meh general indifference.

  51. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

    Different strokes for different folks. Don't be ashamed because you don't like something that other people do. As a middle schooler I loved Ender's game, as an adult it's 'meh', mostly because I've been exposed to all the tropes a hundred times over by now, there's little in Ender's game that hasn't been covered by other, arguably better literature. That said, it's a great introduction to Scifi for kids around that age, or even adults with less... shall we say, confidence in their reading abilities?

  52. If I were the teacher... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    I would file a complaint against my accuser with the police department, on the grounds that anyone who finds textual depictions of naked children sexually arousing (the definition of 'pornography') is obviously a pedophile.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  53. A game by any other name... by Shoten · · Score: 1

    So, let me see if I have this right...

    The current bestseller from Scholastic, The Hunger Games, is about an annual practice where 24 children between the ages of 12 and 18 are forced to fight to the death in publicly-televised hand-to-hand combat with weapons no more advanced than spears or bows and arrows, that is shown to the families and communities where these children come from. And this is fine, apparently. But reading Ender's Game where the worst hand-to-hand violence involves a broken nose, is unacceptable?

    Was the teacher reading it to the students because it was above their reading level, or is it just above the reading level of the principal and superintendent?

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:A game by any other name... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      In this case I think the school acted properly, on the one hand you have what you know to be right, on the other you have an angry parent that may threaten to sue the school system if no action is taken. I think they acted justly, for now. Doesn't mean I agree with it.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:A game by any other name... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Ender kills two kids in Enders Game (and then proceeds to wipe out an entire planet).

      Sure, he never intends violence- but he is the cause for much worse than a broken nose. Nonetheless, I find the book completely appropriate for teenagers- it in no way glorifies violence.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:A game by any other name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. In this day and age, schools HAVE to do what the parents want, immediately. Otherwise, we take a trip to lawsuitville.

      Lawsuitville is a happy town populated by parents the country-over that have bitched loud enough to get their way.

      When I grow up and take over, two changes: (1) licensed breeding; and (2) I'm in charge of the court system. Let me tell you, there better be a good reason for wasting my time with this kind of shit.

    4. Re:A game by any other name... by dwye · · Score: 1

      But reading Ender's Game where the worst hand-to-hand violence involves a broken nose, is unacceptable?

      Broken nose, with the fragments deliberately driven into the brain, killing the assailant. There was another child kicked to death. Ender's Game is not for children, even if his first killing in self-defense occurs when he is six years old.

    5. Re:A game by any other name... by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      But reading Ender's Game where the worst hand-to-hand violence involves a broken nose, is unacceptable?

      When you say "broken nose" you actually mean beaten to a pulp and killed, right?

  54. Who the fuck reads novels to 14 year olds? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Sorry, but by 14 you should be reading all by yourself. You'll be legal to drive in 2 years. Unless this is just a sample passage to illustrate a style why in the world are they "reading to children" who are this old?

    I'd be hard pressed to justify EG as even mildly offensive for someone of that age. Now, if they'd read The Lost Gate - okay, maybe - there are some awkward passages for truly cloistered young teens (I decided it's a little much for my nine year old, and she can wait a couple of years).

    I say we stop having story time for 14 year olds and teach them to read. I'd be pissed about this if it happened in a school my kid was in because it sounds like a waste of valuable teaching time.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Who the fuck reads novels to 14 year olds? by netsavior · · Score: 2

      14 year-olds won't just read if you tell them to. Reading a book to them that is actually exciting and fun and age apropriate is a great way to inspire a love of reading, rather than attempting to emulate the appearance of it for a test. By the time I was 14 I had great expectations assigned to me 3 times. I never read that boring piece of antiquated crap more than once. I have read ender's game a few times... The first run-in with science fiction I ever had was when my dad read me stories from I, Robot when I was a kid; you can bet I was old enough to read at the time, but I didn't have any reason to believe that books could be anything but school assignments before that.

      It sucks that in this case it didn't happen until the kids were 14, but I can think of a lot worse things a teacher can do than attempt to instill a love of reading on their kids... like Test Prep, for example.

    2. Re:Who the fuck reads novels to 14 year olds? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      At 14 they probably know more about sex than we did at that age, what with the interwebs and all.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Who the fuck reads novels to 14 year olds? by atrain728 · · Score: 1

      It was assigned reading. But I agree, it was confusing terminology. Perhaps it's an educator thing.

    4. Re:Who the fuck reads novels to 14 year olds? by alienzed · · Score: 1

      Seriously, why didn't he just wait for the movie?

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    5. Re:Who the fuck reads novels to 14 year olds? by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Or maybe not... after all, they are getting way more theory as opposed to practice, perhaps....

      Oh, who am I kidding. This is /.

      --
      Check your premises.
    6. Re:Who the fuck reads novels to 14 year olds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Someone else made a similar comment above. Reading aloud to teenagers is not a waste of time whatsoever. In fact, reading to older children continues to help improve their accessible vocabulary and pronunciation as well as their listening skills. Good listening skills seem to be lacking in most young adults today. Hearing material read aloud regularly is beneficial to all age groups, and has been utilized as a valuable teaching method throughout history. The teacher should be commended for choosing to read aloud to the students, especially such a thought provoking (and not at all pornographic) book as that one.

    7. Re:Who the fuck reads novels to 14 year olds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many of them are just going to get the Coles Notes, cheat off a nerd, or get their parents to complain and pass them through the grade anyways?

  55. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to hear the parents explain this to the police: "I always considered a nice killing very stimulating to my sex life."

    No, I'd like not...

  56. In most of the US, a high percentage of the population think that nudity==pornographic.

  57. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Nothing wrong with not being able to get into a book; Stephen King is great if you can handle slogging through 3 chapters of pure scene description before the story actually starts, but obviously his writing isn't for everyone.

    The important thing is that you're reading, and (hopefully) learning from it.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  58. Parents rule the schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To anyone who knows anyone who teaches in states with weak teachers unions (mostly down south), it is obvious that the parents rule the schools. In this situation you have the ravings of a single parent leading to someone losing their livelihood. People on /. love to rant and rave about how teachers unions have ruined the educational system in this country. That may be true up north, but down south the unions are essentially powerless and the parents do a fine job of ruining everything all on their own. It certainly doesn't help when school districts are more concerned with protecting their image than they are with protecting decent teachers.

    1. Re:Parents rule the schools by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I'd say that 95% of the reason schools across the nation are suffering is due to parents. I'm sure the "no child left behind" was not the doing of a teachers union or school. Yet my childs education has to suffer because some kid in her class can't keep up so they teach them what they need to know to pass a standardized test. If you look up the definition of standardized test, it should be defined as a bastardization of education, no pun intended.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  59. New breed by Zapotek · · Score: 1

    Ok I'm not usually the guy who starts spewing out conspiracy theories and the like but...does anyone else feel like "the man" (pardon the expression) is grooming the next generation to be mindless, imbecilic, non-critical drones?
    It's like they keep trying to mentally disarm the kids to ensure future complacency and then they have the audacity to frame it as protection.

    I know, I know, don't attribute to malice what can easily be explained by stupidity but this one would require a hell of a lot of stupidity.

    1. Re:New breed by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Despite the foregoing, the human race by tens of thousands would be
      knee-deep in the water around Zanzibar.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:New breed by vlm · · Score: 1

      Basically correct. Its not limited to kids. Some play along, to encourage rebellion against that mindset.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:New breed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I know, don't attribute to malice what can easily be explained by stupidity but this one would require a hell of a lot of stupidity.

      That cliche also mentally disarms people. Stop using it.

    4. Re:New breed by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Heh...funny...seems to apply beautifully to your response's (and your) attitude.

    5. Re:New breed by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No. You are suffering from bias..probably two of them:
      1) It's the medias job to report the rare outlandish things. So when ever you watch/read something from the media, it's bad.

      2) Your brain is looking for ma pattern and now it's fitting everything into the 'people are being groomed' idea.

      This issue is a rare instance, compared to the number of people who go to school, and people are getting upset by the banning.

      So, no there is no grooming. I get how you're brain will start to think that after being awash in a bias. Many peoples would.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:New breed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're too late. This is what happens when this generation raises children.

      The boy appears to be incapable of making his own mind up, and ran to his Mom. She decided it was bad, and made her feelings known.

      Why did she think it was bad? Because she was told it was bad. By whom? Her parents, of course!

      America is a very strange place to anyone who doesn't live there, and they're infecting the rest of the world. Which is sad.

  60. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like Sci-fi isn't your type of story? Nothing wrong with that.

  61. I wonder by no-body · · Score: 1

    what people have repressed in their minds to initiate this

    - anger
    - joy
    - lust
    - sensuality ...
    every creature has it - plants included - or they would not exist.
    This basic fact is highly suppressed and controlled by every entity in power (allowed by other's succumbing) on this planet.

    And what are they going through? Oh - she has shown a nipple or gosh, there is some pubic hair to see and ghee, somebody used a nasty word - one of seven, is it???
    Then there is perversion coming out of all of this repression.

    Puritans - holy fucking puritans!

    Get a life!

  62. ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember so kid reprogramming his iPad to display a giant wagging dong, but that is just (pardon the pun) ridiculous.

  63. This doesn't sound correct... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    The school district, however, appears to agree with the parent, is considering firing the teacher and will be eliminating the book from the school.

    If they will be "eliminating the book from the school", then it was probably on the approved reading list, then the teacher is not at fault (so to speak), but the school (district). My wife was a teacher for many, many years and, on those occasions she wanted to teach off the approved list, would send letters to and obtain signatures from parents. Children of parents that objected would get a book from the approved list and separate assignments. (She was awarded as one of the best teachers in the school district and state, BTW.)

    Also worth mentioning, from TFA, is that the teacher also read the following books to her students with, apparently, no complaints:

    The other books were ‘Devil’s Paintbox’ by Victoria McKearnan and ‘Curtain: Poirot’s Last Case’, written by Agatha Christie.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  64. Recommended reading by the Marines... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When i was in the United States Marine Corps, the Ender's Game series was on the "Recommended Reading" list.

    There is nothing pornograhic about the book. Sure its about a group of kids raised by the government and trained their whole lives to be warriors...

  65. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Card explains at the end of the 20th audio version ofr Ender's Game that he only wrote the novel because it was a pre-req for "Speaker for the dead", which I think is the much better work.

  66. Someone who hasn't read the book by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Someone who hasn't read the book naturally assumed that it was about someone playing a game with their "end".

    1. Re:Someone who hasn't read the book by andrea.sartori · · Score: 1

      ...or confused it with Gerald's Game

      --
      Mostly harmless.
  67. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for posting!

  68. the three books by ogrevirus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found this list of books in the comment section of this page: http://www.aikenstandard.com/story/031512-school-board-releases-statement-to-enders-game-book The three books are Ender's Game (Card), Devils Paintbox (), and Curtain, Poirots Last Case (Agatha Christie)

    1. Re:the three books by dd1968 · · Score: 1

      Any book with the word "Devil" in the title is going to raise of the ire of the whack-job Christian-Far-Right types in rural South Carolina. As will any book that includes the words "bruised testicles" or otherwise acknowledges any aspect of the human reproductive system. Hell, I'm sure they even found something in the Agatha Christie novel to complain about.

    2. Re:the three books by ogrevirus · · Score: 1

      I read quite a few comments on the site. One commenter in particular was saying that the teacher had a nook and somehow bypassed the firewall to be able to get to an erotic fiction type site or he had the book on his nook already.

  69. any SC lawers in the room?? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    I could see this as being a wrongful dismissal suit in the making. Is there anything in Enders Game that is remotely pornographic??
    is there some other OBJECTIVE reason that this book should not be read to this group of students??

    if A AND B = False then this district just paid for this teacher to retire.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:any SC lawers in the room?? by gishzida · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for the teacher SC is a right to work state... which means that an employer in SC has the right to do things to their employees they would not do to their hunting dog-- and get away with it! If "dismissed for cause" a lawyer cannot charge more that $326 for representing the discharged employee before the SCDEW... Also understand that it is also an employment "At Will" state... means you can be given the boot at any time.

      There will be no wrongful dismissal as no lawyer here would take the job [it might interfere with future work -- the 'good ol' boy network' is alive an well here... you screw with the powers that be and they will screw you and make sure you stay screwed.]

      OTOH I find it ironic that Card's work [a self described homophobe] is being called pornographic.

  70. She Should Read The Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most likely this is a confusion in understanding - arising from the report of a young teen, over-reacted to by his parent.

  71. Memo to self by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

    See what the Colbert Report has to say about this tonight...

    --
    Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  72. I think I know what happened here. by bistromath007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kid: "These two kids beat each other up in the shower."

    Parent: "Did you just say two kids beat each other off in the shower?!?!?"

    American educational system: "SHUT. DOWN. EVERYTHING."

    1. Re:I think I know what happened here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a Pandemic 2 reference?

    2. Re:I think I know what happened here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats nothing. a buddy of mine had to change his shirt that was advertisement for local meat market.

      "Cant beat our meats"

    3. Re:I think I know what happened here. by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > Kid: "These two kids beat each other up in the shower."

      > Parent: "Did you just say two kids beat each other off in the shower?!?!?"

      Kid: "And one even DIED from it!!"

      TFIFY. :-)

  73. Another Justification of William Tecumseh Sherman by sehlat · · Score: 1

    Among many others.

  74. bad book choice by k8to · · Score: 1

    The book is violent, the morals being presented are twisted, and the author very much damaged goods.

    I don't think reading this in a scholastic setting is probably ever appropriate, unless possibly for adults deconstructing what is done right (many things) and wrong (many things) with the text.

    I'm not at all surprised that someone objected to it, although it's somewhat amusing that they select essentlly a completely incorrect descriptor for its various problems.

    --
    -josh
    1. Re:bad book choice by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

      Yeah! We can't have those evil books turning children into murderers and rapists, now can we?

  75. How can they? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    How can this be? The teacher should fight this seeing how it's not on any banned books lists.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  76. Why stay at home? by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your circumstances are perfect for getting involved politically.

    Start locally. Have you written a PAPER letter to your Congress critters yet? To your governor? To your state legislature?

    If not, why not?

    Have you volunteered for a political candidate?

    1. Re:Why stay at home? by Anrego · · Score: 2

      Start locally. Have you written a PAPER letter to your Congress critters yet? To your governor? To your state legislature?

      I'm Canadian, but have done so to the equivalents. Received the usual form letter reply for the most part.

      Have you volunteered for a political candidate?

      All the candidates mostly agree with each other on the issues I care about.

    2. Re:Why stay at home? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because my Representative live in the 21st century and prefer communication via email. And yes, I have communicated with them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Why stay at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Start locally. Have you written a PAPER letter to your Congress critters yet? To your governor? To your state legislature?

      I'm Canadian, but have done so to the equivalents. Received the usual form letter reply for the most part.

      Have you volunteered for a political candidate?

      All the candidates mostly agree with each other on the issues I care about.

      That sums it all up. Canada is so apathetic, they even dropped the 'M' from 'Meh'.

    4. Re:Why stay at home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't take seriously anything that you say.

      Why? "Congress critters". This is no different than: sheeple, tea baggers, republitard, democrud, and whatever other mindless doublespeak you idiots come up with. How on Earth do you think that we can have a civilized discourse with people like you out there?

    5. Re:Why stay at home? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I wrote my Senator. He basically told me he didn't care what I thought and that he was right and he was looking out for my safety. I actually voted for him prior to the letter. I went so far as to donate to the Democrat running against him even though I actually thought the Dem was a stupid piece of shit. At least the Dem wasn't a condescending stupid piece of shit. I don't mind that he thought I was wrong so much as that the fucker had the gall to tell me he was trying to keep me safe. Fuck him. He's not there to keep me safe, he's there to secure my freedom and guarantee my rights. Suspending my rights and freedom to keep me safe? I hate people like that, I hope his asshole grows shut.

  77. Due diligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's South Carolina. The school administrators are probably trying to find a dictionary to look up "all them big words". There isn't much room in a double wide for a book case. Wait, I'm thinking of West Virginia. South Carolinia only has single wides.

  78. Ban the Classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like um Catcher in the Rye or Lord of the Flies. As homework they should assign the parent to read Ender's Game. It's an easy read, it's written about the 9th grade level (which is sadly above most American's reading level), I can't imagine it would take more then a week to read through.

    As a bonus project said parent + student team should write a paper on sexuality and hidden messages in Disney and other children's media, that would be EPIC.

  79. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    or even adults with less... shall we say, confidence in their reading abilities?

    Heh, touché! I wouldn't call myself a heavy reader, but having slogged through the History of the Peloponnesian War, Life and Work in Medieval Europe (4th to 14th centuries), the first two Ringworld books (third is in the wings), Ever Since Darwin (Gould), Rendezvous with Rama, and the one that I know is going to be tough going, Command Decisions (a book describing decisions made in WWII on both sides put out by the U.S. Army), along with the usual suspects such as Hawking and Greene, I can at least say I'm well read on numerous subjects.

    Maybe if I come across it at a yard sale or another library sale I'll pick it up but for what they wanted at this place, I couldn't justify the price, especially considering it didn't do much for me.

    As an aside, my current reading, Panzer Commander: The Memoirs of Colonle Hans von Luck, is one I recommend to people not so much for the military aspect (it's mostly sidelined until the D-day invasion), but rather for the breath of the man's experiences. He knew (literally) everyone from Russia to Britain and down through Italy. He made friends and acquaintances as easily as you or I drink water.

    He doesn't mince words about what he thought about the higher ups and doesn't hide or downplay what took place. It's his insight into what was really going on, his thought process, and how he carried out his orders despite the nonsense coming from on high that makes the book such a great read. Highly recommended for anyone who wants an inside look at one of the true honest soldiers from the German side (Rommel being the shining example that the U.S. military uses to this day in some training exercises.)

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  80. well that seems... heyyyyy, wait a minute! by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    Someone explain this to me:

    > "and will be eliminating the book from the school."

    According to TFA, the kids were fourteen, so that makes it freshman year in high school. (The book is rated 12 and over.)

    The quote indicates that the book was available at the school, most probably in the school library.

    So let me get this straight:

    The teacher reads an age-appropriate book, available at the school, to students in the class, and gets fired? Seriously?

    I predict that if this story goes viral, the school will suddenly reconsider.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:well that seems... heyyyyy, wait a minute! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      or 8th grade; depending on what month you where born.

      Still, yeah he should be plenty old enough for this. There are other reports that it wasn't ender's game. The teacher is just trying to cover his ass.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  81. This is not about enders game, see link for story by blackdoor · · Score: 1
  82. So it starts with their education then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've often wondered why rednecks are the way they are. Now I know.

  83. Nice Catch - Neat Article - Super Premise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If "mom" based her complaint on this, however, she just did not understand it.

  84. Are we getting the whole story? by 91degrees · · Score: 2
    I found anotherarticle ,

    According to the incident report, a teacher had been reading pornographic material from the Internet to the students in class. One of the stories was about prostitutes having their faces covered with ejaculation.

    Is it possible that the teacher wasn't reading these books at all, but was, for some reason, reading something downloaded from the internet?

    Somebody is lying, I'm not sure who.

  85. Censorship is always wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My daughter read _Ender's Game_ (on her own, not for school) when she was 16 or 17. She said she liked it and it was a good book; it was interesting and complex. I haven't read it yet, but I still might. I never banned my daughter from reading anything. When she was really little, I kept things age appropriate, but once she was older, I let her read any book. If something in a book was upsetting, we discussed it, we analyzed it, and talked about why the author wrote about the subject and about what the author was trying to say. She didn't tell me about the scene described above--the bathroom scene--but I can tell you that she never killed anyone in a bathroom (or killed anyone anywhere, for that matter) either before or after reading the book!

    I think people need to be taught not to take things literally. Just because authors write something doesn't mean they are endorsing it. They often write things as examples of behaviors that they don't endorse. Also, strong subject matter in various books gave me an opportunity to discuss things with my daughter and to tell her whether or not I agreed with the information presented and why. I also taught her to evaluate what she reads.

    The only book I advised my daughter not to read was the Bible, because I think it is too violent, sexist, and racist for anyone under the age of 18.

  86. Laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such a great series, and considering Orson is a right leaning devout mormon.. this is almost laughable.

  87. So, Thatcher was right by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Congratulations slave, you have proven the Conservatives right, they believed that making the working class home owners would turn them into good reliable little workers unwilling to risk the house they can't afford with silly things such as looking for a new job, or even thinking about striking.

    Why bother with capturing slaves when the feeble just whip themselves?

    Mind you, you wouldn't be so bad, if the bleeding hearts wouldn't feel sorry you if you get slaughtered in the revolution. But somehow, your kind then suddenly turns into "innocent" citizens and not supporters of the regime.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:So, Thatcher was right by Anrego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      unwilling to risk the house they can't afford

      Almost paid for.. never had any major financial trouble in my life. Just because some people bought houses way out of their price range doesn't mean every home owner ends up screwing themselves. I went for a reasonably priced house with a reasonable term mortgage and 30% down payment (protip: if you can't save up at least 20% within a reasonable time.. do't buy it!) and with room to breath in the event of a major interest rate hike or other financial hardship.

      I've lived within my means and have kept up on my retirement savings.

      Why bother with capturing slaves when the feeble just whip themselves?

      Yes.. job I like, decent money, house, car, time to spend on my hobbies.. my life is just terrible. I get that the people struggling down there are frustrated, and it's nice to think that the middle class only think they are happy but are really suffering.. however the truth is we are for the most part legitimately happy. That's why we arn't out protesting...

      Slaughtered in the revolution.

      The middle class probably need to be on board to have a hope in hell in getting anywhere with that one.

      Then again, I'm Canadian... thing's arn't _as_ bleak up here yet.

    2. Re:So, Thatcher was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on Slashdot can this sort of ultra-hyperbole be written with a straight face.

    3. Re:So, Thatcher was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Few questions for you. Do you have a job and a home? Possibly a family?

      If you answered 'yes' to any of the above, were you actively taking part in the Occupy protests? Were you earlier today standing in front of one of those banks and/or large corporations with a picket sign?

      If you answered 'no' to any of those, then sit down and shut the fuck up.

    4. Re:So, Thatcher was right by jd · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say "legitimately happy". If people were "legitimately happy", they wouldn't own SUVs, oversized televisions or other emotional props. Once you get past something being necessary, you get into the realm of useful. Once you pass the realm of useful, you enter the realm of convenient/pleasurable. Pass THAT realm as well, you get into the turf of Penis Envy.

      The majority of middle class folk, these days, are in that final zone. Big Time.

      However, the feeble aren't whipping themselves -- the sick are the last people to know that they aren't well. Nor are they truly suffering -- they've a surfeit of carthexis to ensure that they're just Comfortably Numb. Those who don't drug themselves on luxuries (or chemicals - they do exactly the same thing to the brain, so they are the same thing in the end) will feel some pain. But politicians are smart enough to know that there's a lot of inertia - both in individuals and society. Even if one individual exceeds the inertia, it won't do anything. The majority have to exceed their inertia before anything happens and as the Middle East has shown, it takes continuous hellish conditions for upwards of half a millenium before it becomes serious on even something as small as a subcontinent.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:So, Thatcher was right by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say "legitimately happy". If people were "legitimately happy", they wouldn't own SUVs, oversized televisions or other emotional props. Once you get past something being necessary, you get into the realm of useful. Once you pass the realm of useful, you enter the realm of convenient/pleasurable. Pass THAT realm as well, you get into the turf of Penis Envy.

      The majority of middle class folk, these days, are in that final zone. Big Time.

      The whole middle class mindless sheep glumly drifting through life under a false sense of happiness thing is a great argument piece.. but I just don't buy it.

      It's certainly true for some, but I think that has to do with a lot of other factors as well. It doesn't match what I see on a day to day basis. In my personal case, I drive a honda civic.. spend a fair amount of time on my hobbies (wood working, electornics, computers, etc..) .. spend time with friends.. go on vacations.. etc.

      The real question is, what exactly should we (or I) be doing instead in this proposed utopia that will make my current level of happiness seem like a clinical depression.

    6. Re:So, Thatcher was right by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What you are doing is precisely what I would recommend others do - stay diversified, have many interests that are at most tangentially related, be aware of the wider world, exercise (but not to excess), etc. Stagnation is "easy" and so creates the surface illusion of comfort together with an undercurrent of depression. Based on what you've said, I'm willing to accept that that is something you've avoided in most - if not all - things. There might be areas you could tweak, where you've got a little inflexible, a little rusty, but I doubt you'd get a major boost there. If you keep on expanding the diversity, experiment with new hobbies at random when you get bored of the familiar, etc, then you'll probably find you stay at your typical level of happiness far more than you would if you didn't keep growing, but you probably do that already as well.

      I'm not convinced that the majority of the middle class are anything like as mentally or physically agile. There, I would expect a dramatic emotional (and mental) boost from improving the variety in their life AND boosting the rate of change of the variety in their life. You want the first-order differential to be non-zero.

      What else? I can only suggest the tediously obvious -- keep everything you do a challenge - enough of one to be interesting and stimulating but no more. Maximizes your odds of benefiting and how much you'll benefit by, which in turn will give you assorted blasts of brain chemicals, which in turn triggers neurogenesis, which in turn creates a long-term boost in your happiness. Seratonin, endorphins - all good stuff, but that gives you a buzz for a few seconds. Boost neurogenesis and the baseline happiness will be increased for the next 3-4 years.

      This is part of why stagnation is depressing. The brain is extremely energy-intensive to keep going. The body, having evolved to conserve energy, won't waste it on cells that are not utilized. Of course, most of the brain IS utilized, but there is measurable shrinkage when people do stagnate. Just as cell birth (neurogenesis) raises the baseline mood, cell death lowers it. In consequence, people who are stagnant are more depressed than they would otherwise be. Not necessarily more depressed than average -- a naturally cheerful person who is stagnant may still be "cheerful" (and I'm sure you know lots of those), but it's obvious to look at that that cheer is nothing but a hollow shell of the potential the person actually has. They could be the happiest person alive and yet still be gloomier than they need be.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:So, Thatcher was right by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I think the issue here is that we used to divide the classes into "upper" and "lower", and then inserted a small "middle" area reserved for those who had the same power over the lower classes as the upper, but without the pedigree and assets.

      Last century, there was a big push to expand the "middle" class to cover more of what used to be the "lower" class -- but what ended up happening is that the lower class divided into the working lower class and the destitute/homeless... and the "middle" class was joined by a "lower class borrowing from upper class to pretend to be the middle class" group.

      Since then, we've actually seen the middle class shrinking, with more and more people slipping into the faux middle class without noticing it, a few slipping into the lower class via unemployment/bankruptcy, and a tiny trickle making enough money off their debt to be able to overthrow the debt, settle down, and create an endowment for upper class children to enjoy.

      People these days can generally be divided as such:
      Those doing everything they can to survive
      Those working to survive
      Those borrowing to enjoy life
      Those struggling to control their assets

      There are a few other outlier groups, but they're not statistically significant. The main point is, most people are kept too busy by their goals to actually enjoy their life to its fullest, or take time off to govern other people who have no desire to be governed.

      So this goes back to the original issue: Easier/more lucrative in the short term to take pot shots where it may preserve your current way of life with minimal personal effort than to try and correct/direct the system.

      Plus: do you really want the soccer moms controlling all levels of government?

  88. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by stevenvi · · Score: 1

    Please cite your source, as I am unable to find this anywhere except in user-generated comments.

  89. The Fountainhead by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    I remember reading The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand in Grade 11. The whole class read it, and we spent days discussing and dissecting it. It had a fairly graphic rape scene, as I recall, and nobody seemed to have any problems with that. And it was a Catholic school!

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    1. Re:The Fountainhead by dwye · · Score: 1

      And it was a Catholic school!

      Well, that explains it. Seriously, public education frequently sucks (and I was a graduate of it).

      Off Topic, however, since the class was probably 7th or 8th grade, and there is no graphic or even non-graphic sex, just a couple of killings and an unknowing act of species-genocide, at least in Ender's Game. Of course, there is some evidence that the teacher was also reading Internet pr0n to a class of children two years before they would become legal; if the teacher ejaculated the words it would be a class D felony of the 2nd degree in SC, at least according to wikipedia.

  90. Erm... by GmExtremacy · · Score: 1

    Even if it was pornographic, I don't see why criminal charges would be filed. Pointless "for the children" nonsense once again...

    Sexuality bad, violence good!

  91. If only stupidity was illegal... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    most of this species of wingnut would be in jail.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  92. Not everyone's cup of tea. by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    I read several of the books until I came to the conclusion that Orson Scott Card's books, while often entertaining, contain a really ugly fascist streak. I got disgusted after about the third Ender book and put Card's books down, probably forever. However, other people like his books.

    This isn't about free choice, however. This is about a teacher and a captive audience.

    I wouldn't want my kid exposed to Orson Scott Card's crap, unless the kid chooses it himself (and we could discuss the themes). I would never want Orson Scott Card forced on ANY captive audience.

    1. Re:Not everyone's cup of tea. by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

      Yes, because if you ignore fascism it will never crop up. I think that would be the whole point is showing what a fascist society would be like. Similar to George Orwell and 1984. Most people probably could do without the big brother crap, but again if you turn a blind eye, look what happens.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:Not everyone's cup of tea. by phlinn · · Score: 1

      What did you see as pro-fascism in the books? I've only read them once and didn't get that impression at all. I'm leery of accepting that interpretation because I've also heard it falsely claimed about Heinlein.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
  93. Just in time for the movie! by Wingfat · · Score: 0

    Sweet! cant wait.. and Harrison Ford too? nice
    Ender's Game

  94. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  95. Sharia? by jduhls · · Score: 1

    I thought we didn't want sharia law in this country. I is confused.

  96. This was on my middle-school summer reading list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Did this community also ban Catcher In The Rye and all Mark Twain books containing the "N" word?

  97. Blame the parents by doston · · Score: 1

    Then blame the faculty that fears the parents who are in total denial. I know that my 14 year old nephews knew what a midget fingerbanging herself was by the age of 12, if not sooner. Banning Enders friggin' Game is a lot about being in denial of reality, not to mention far too little far too late. Do they know what those kids chat and text about?? I ran (ops engineering) the text messaging service for AT&T for years and a quick 'tail -f' of the logs on any given SMS server would reveal that they aren't talking about the latest hair style, unless it was regarding pubes. After running T-Mobile's MMS system for 3 years, I can assure you they're not texting art photos, either. Parents need to wise up. Unleash the full internet on your kids with any connected device and they'll soon know a lot more than Enders Game. If you don't get them a device with those capabilities, they'll still see it all at their little friend's house. Give it up...pandoras box is wide open and it's too late to ban books. The things I've seen. MY EYES!! MY BEAUTIFUL EYES!!!

    1. Re:Blame the parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After running T-Mobile's MMS system for 3 years, I can assure you they're not texting art photos, either.

      Yeah I was on T-Mo for ten years until last May. I recall them having the WORST MMS support of any carrier.

      Perhaps it would have been better if pervy wankers like yourself hadn't been too busy looking at MMS CP to care that the system was broken most of the time.

  98. Land of greed, home of the slaves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just face it guys, America isn't that great. And I don't care if people call me a troll or anything else. Everything people believe is an illusion perpetrated by Hollywood and other bullshit propaganda. All your little rules are going to get you nowhere.

  99. odd by skogs · · Score: 1

    I remember reading this on my own in 6th grade. I heard it was a sci fi classic, and read it. I remember it being fairly mind blowing at the time. I'm not 100% sure if it was really that eye opening, or if I was just that young and green behind the ears. I don't remember anything naughty in it. I turned out ok, as did millions of nerds after and before me.

    I hate stupid people.

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  100. What's this really about? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    In all reality I'd like to know if this student that was "bothered" by such material also noted in TFA as being male (which is odd that a boy would be bothered by sex, especially at 14) has had prior run ins with this teacher, being either grades or getting singled out by the teacher for something (read embarrassed). If it was actually dug into I'd be willing to wager there is more to it than just a lewd book being read.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  101. The three books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The three books:
    http://www.aikenstandard.com/story/031612-teacher-pornographic-materials-update--3865561

    Some still claim the teacher had read something else, other than those three.

  102. And you wonder why there are no good teachers. by Sosetta · · Score: 1

    In Colorado, the state legislature did away with tenure for elementary-middle-high school teachers. You don't get to argue for more pay, since it's just based on your level of education (B.S or M.S), and # of hours you've taken above your last degree, but you can never have true job security.

    Why would anyone do a job where any idiot parent can raise a stink over something stupid, and you get fired for it? Seriously, in Office Space, the main character had 8 bosses, and that was considered ridiculous. For the average teacher, they have 150 bosses, and the bosses change every year. You wonder why all the teachers that stay never do anything for fear of doing something that someone will find offensive.

  103. Shower scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think about that every time I soap up without the water running!

  104. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by swillden · · Score: 2
    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  105. Books at a school, where children might read them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot believe that South Carolina is so bold as to allow children to see and touch books, let alone hear passages read out loud. Next they be'll teaching them to read alone in their bedrooms without supervision or MPAA/RIAA royalties being owed. That takes aware from a child's financial responsibility to support such lazy sleaze-bag "entertainment" companies.

    I expect the MPAA will also sue the teacher for undermining some movie studio's film rights by providing a story narration (under the guise of "public performance") without proper MPAA licensing.

    At least I am glad to know that that manly violence and pro-preemptive strike military aggression were not cited as areas of concern, but pornography of which I recall none. Maybe I should sue my retailer and the publisher for cheating me out of a much more interesting edition of Ender's Game.

  106. There's no sex in Ender's Game. by Animats · · Score: 2

    There's no sex at all in the original short story. Some of the later stuff, as they grow up, has some sex, but it's not a big issue.

    Actually, Ender's Game is a naive view of the political effectiveness of blogging.

    1. Re:There's no sex in Ender's Game. by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Enders Game was published in 1977. It's understandable that they didn't know how blogging would turn out.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  107. Where is the original story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the original story that says what actually happened? All that I can find on the net is one more or less original story that says that a teacher was reported to the police for allegedly reading pornography from the internet to his middle school students. There were some vague references to three books, but nothing specifically mentioning Ender's Game.

    So is this whole flap over a real incident, or is it just an example of the Internet acting as a huge echo chamber?

  108. What about All Quiet on the Western Front et al? by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

    There clearly is a double standard when it comes to literature and questionable content for minors in a book. In All Quiet on the Western Front, there were references to Russian prisoners of war being so malnourished and sickly that they no longer masturbated to pass the time.

    I cannot remember the title but there was a Gary Paulsen book that I read in 8th grade for school where the two protagonists where a young teenage boy and girl who escape their lives by connecting with nature on an island. There was a paragraph in this book describing how they would take their clothes off and go swimming in the lake and how it felt completely natural and beautiful in a non-sexual way.

    Why is this acceptable reading for a high school student where Enders Game is not?

  109. Pornographic? by pgn674 · · Score: 1

    I'm about 75% of the way through my first read of this book. So far I've seen nothing that under any insanely loose definition could be considered pornographic. Now I'm wondering if something happens in the last quarter. I'm going to not RTFA or the comments, and finish the book.

  110. Well it was written by a Mormon by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I remember babysittting his kids at an Atlanta Georgia WorldCon once.

    So be very very scared.

    Not.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  111. Rush lyrics by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the lyrics from "Witch Hunt": "They say there are strangers who threaten us In our immigrants and infidels They say there is strangeness too dangerous In our theaters and bookstore shelves That those who know what's best for us Must rise and save us from ourselves" To me these lyrics are a warning against this sort of paranoid "book burning", "think of the children"/right-wing Fascist mentality. However, I've ran into Rush fans, both IRL and online who took these lyrics to mean that "someone" needs to rise up and protect "us" from "Dangerous Human Elements"...

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:Rush lyrics by SgtXaos · · Score: 1

      As a Rush fan, and having studied their lyrics and read Neil's writing, I have gained some insights into the philosophies they hold. I can only agree with you and not with the people you reference in your last sentence.

      Not everyone who enjoys Rush music necessarily understands the messages and concepts in the lyrics.

      --
      -- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
  112. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by tphb · · Score: 1

    Makes much more sense.

    Also, why would anyone be reading Ender's Game to a bunch of 14 year olds? Can't they read it themselves?

    Everyone just jumped on this bogus article because it fits the "oh, dear, censorship is prevalent" motif. Baloney.

  113. I find this absolutely hilarious and terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read The Commitments for my English assignment. It was a fantastic read and I thank my teacher Mr Hamilton for suggesting it to me.
    He also showed Educating Rita, another classic, he was sort of like him without the drinking problem, actually.

    Seems this school is still at the "laughs in sex class" stage of development.
    As for the kid and parent, complete morons who should be buried in a war vault and key thrown in to the middle of the pacific. Repulsive.
    Reminds me of a girl I knew in my class who refused to watch a 12 film because she was 11 and her mom said she wasn't allowed to.
    I can't believe people like this even exist.

    For crying out loud, THE SIMPSONS has worse events happening in it most of the time compared to a BOOK about someone being beaten to death.
    The Simpsons has actual gore in it.
    Don't forget that Mario, crushing all those poor helpless animals! HOW CRUEL!

    Hope he gets employed quickly. Never a good thing to see a teacher being suspended unfairly.

  114. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    So how do you downrank 300 posts of self-righteous "damn those bible bangers!" outrage as -1 misguided and irrelevant?

    --
    -Styopa
  115. really? by OshMan · · Score: 1

    Talk about wiggin out.

  116. Interrupting your regularly scheduled rant: by Hartree · · Score: 3, Informative

    But the articles linked are very long on speculation and very short on info.

    Parent makes complaint about something bizarre happening in the classroom. Teacher is suspended pending investigation.

    Let me assure you, this happens outside of the south. Let me also assure you it happens in politically diverse communities.

    Being the son of a high school teacher, I've heard this story a lot of times.

    There are a lot of possibilities here. The complaint apparently was that the teacher read something about semen coating the faces of prostitutes. That certainly isn't in Ender's Game.

    So, maybe it's in the other two books mentioned. But, that's doubtful given the books (Agatha Christie and a book aimed at young teens.)

    So, we could have a kid (for whatever reason, but being nutty, or disliking the teacher are a couple possibilities or on a dare from friends) telling parents something that didn't happen.

    Or, we could have a parent that's kinda mental, or having a bad week, or a drunken rage etc, etc . That happens with alarming regularity when you have to deal with large numbers of parents. Most are fine, some are messed up.

    Much, much farther down the list is that it's due to a conservative and or southern conspiracy or any other societal factor.

    As to the suspension. School administrations are historically the most pusillanimous bunch of cover your butt bureaucrats there are. Especially if the parent is a known problem, or someone of influence in the community.

    But, if you want to elevate the less likely to the fore, then Occam's Razor isn't going to stop you.

  117. Not about Ender's Game. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  118. Gee and with language like that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    You wonder why so few people support your position and why you remain on the fringe.

    Seriously if that's your view on the world, I'll oppose you on principle that I'm pretty sure any rule you would put in to place will be WAY worse than what we have.

    Of course realistically you are just a person who likes to whine and post toughguy rhetoric on the Internet from the safety of home so I don't need to worry about opposing anything.

  119. The Commandant of the Marine Corps and... by trygstad · · Score: 1

    ...the Chief of Naval Operations would probably take exception to this since Ender's Game has been on their official reading lists for service members pretty much as long as the lists have been published. (Starship Troopers is on there, too.)

  120. Try that shit with the bible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See what happens. :)

  121. Just dodged the bullet on that one... by fermat1313 · · Score: 2

    Back in the 90s, I was a middle school math teacher. I always felt my job as a teacher was to educate a rounded person, so I included non-math discussions and assignments from time-to-time. One of my classes was Algebra II, taught to 8th and 9th graders. These were advanced students, and I enjoyed teaching about things outside the math world, some of which related to math, some of which didn't.

    For this class, I generally offered some extra credit points to students who completed an out-of-class reading assignment. I listed books like Flatland, The God Particle, and yes, Ender's Game. I warned my students that it had some violence and harsh language, and left it up to them to decide. Never got any complaints from any parents, fortunately. After reading this, that book would probably go off my list.

    I do agree it showed bad judgement to read this book to a classroom, full of students with varying levels of maturity, and students with vastly different tastes for violence and strong language. I would have never done that. Firing the teacher? Calling the book pornographic? That simply ludicrous

  122. Homeschooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a simple answer for this parent: homeschooling. If they are so outraged over Ender's Game, they shouldn't have their kid in public schooling. They can shelter their kid as much as they want at home. What they shouldn't do is punish the rest of the kids and school system over their misguided outrage.

  123. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by dtolman · · Score: 1

    In addition to the link the other poster mentioned, the earliest cite is: http://www.aikenstandard.com/story/031412-Aiken-County-Schools--3859574 which also mentions a story with a prostitute and a sexual act. .

  124. I read that book by alienzed · · Score: 1

    and I don't remember anything being particularly inappropriate. Any one know what they are referring to? I mean the Bible has GOT to have much much worse scenes in it.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    1. Re:I read that book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but kids should be protected from their parent's ignorance, so I don't know if the Bible is a good example.

  125. Seems to me... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    They don't want their kid educated, they want a babysitter.

  126. I'm glad you did too by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Since clearly your intelligence is low enough that:

    1) You believe an activity that happens in one part of the US by one individual is something that can be generalized to the entire country of 311 million.

    2) That the US is the only place that has problems, that other nations are lands of milk and honey where people don't do stupid things, government don't do stupid things and there aren't problems.

    We are likely better without you. Perhaps your time abroad will give you some perspective and greater education and then maybe you'll be of more use.

  127. Re:I'll get flamed for this, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is also just a decent book to read, if only because it is so well known, and for the variety. I read Ender's Game somewhere between War and Peace (meh) and Moby Dick (amazing). Sometimes you need an easy to read, friendly romp. There are only so many good SciFi authors, there is no reason to discount Card or Ender's Game, especially since the later novels are quite decent (Xenocide notwithstanding).

  128. Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they're going to ban a book because a teacher read them something off of the internet about hookers taking shots to the face, which is entirely unrelated?

    The fuck?

    If they ban that book I'll use my fucking tax returns to rent a helicopter and buy a bunch of copies and dump 'em all over the school grounds.

  129. incredible reaction from the school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am more shocked at the school's decision to support disciplining the teacher than anything else.

    If a school has a policy (for whatever obscure reason) then it's their right. You don't like it, don't work there, don't send your kids there.

    I can relate to this story.

    My wife worked for a Jewish Orthodox (Chassidic, Lubavitch) elementary school for girls in Canada.

    The principal set the tone; no books or discussions on dinosaurs, evolution, or anything else risquee. Fine.

    One day she read a book that referenced the ancient Greeks. Big no-no. A parent found out (one of the more conservative parents of a pretty
    conservative family) and complained.

    Thankfully the result was measured: principal approached my wife, explained to her that she couldn't read books about ancient greece (rolling of eyes
    followed) and that was that.

    No disciplinary action needed. Handled like adults.

  130. My Junior High School showed "A Clockwork Orange" by Sipper · · Score: 1

    This is rediculous.

    When I was in junior high school, one of the teachers I had in 8th grade at the time showed us the movie "A Clockwork Orange" on video, in its entirety, and then we had a discussion about it. In the film there's a scene where a well-endowed woman is fully nude and a number of males are preparing to gang rape her, but are interrupted by the main characters of the film, who then get into an all-out brawl.

    As far as I know, none of we students complained, nor the parents. I felt that the movie was a bit shocking (duh) to show to JHS students, but that alone doesn't make it wrong to do so. If anything perhaps seeing it with adult supervision in such a setting might be fitting, because at least that way there's an adult to ask questions from or disscuss imagry that a student finds disturbing.

    The other thought I had is that perhaps a book has more impact than a movie "because the pictures are better" -- i.e. the imagination can make imagry that can have more impact than any visual imagry can. Regardless of this, I see no reason why reading "Enders Game" to students should cause such a stir like this.

  131. As usual the Summary is horribly wrong by sdguero · · Score: 4, Informative

    But this time the original article was flawed too, and it ahs subsequently been updated (although I'm sure 95% of /. readers will never know that). Supposedly the teacher read stuff off the internet to the class that was "pornographic" and Card himself has said he heard what was read and it WAS inappropriate for kids (and he maintained that his book is perfectly OK for 14 years olds).

  132. Outrageous!!! by richieb · · Score: 2

    They have books in South Carolina!!

    --
    ...richie - It is a good day to code.
  133. Greedheads and Nazi bastards by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    What crimes? For the most part they followed the law.

    Yes they did. They spent the prior twenty years lobbying to have the banking regulations that prevented them from taking outlandish risks with what was essentially other people's money, and then raked in massive personal gains when they produced short term gains in what was essentially a financial game of Russian roulette. The people in charge of things knew very well what was going on. I am not a banker and I can see how risky their behavior is, and these people are not idiots.

    Their behavior has cost the country billions of dollars, and probably put tens of thousands out of work for personal gain with full knowledge of what would eventually happen. They should be dragged from their mansions and shot in the back of the head with a cheap Luger as a object lesson in social justice. How many times must the country be fleeced by Enron style corporate shenanigans before we realize that treasonous activity is deliberately working against national interest in the boardroom or the battlefield?

    *Hunter S. Thompson Rant Mode Deactivated*

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  134. Ender's Game comment by Independent_forever · · Score: 1

    Why is every solution in this country to fire someone or jail someone when a mistake MAY have been made? And I emphasize MAY!!!! This country and its ridiculous leftist ideals is turning this nation into a STATEIST and UTOPIAN state where we ALL LOSE OUR FREEDOMS.

  135. They are teaching their kids to be ignorant.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read the article but just based on some of the comments of those that did. This is the only realization i can come to.
    It seems like the future of the curriculum is to stop imagination, critical thinking, cultivation of different thinking and to make cookie cutter drones that don't question society or themselves.

    What the hell happened!?!?!?!

    Oh i became an adult...:P

  136. Fucked Up World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the same schools that ban kids from walking home like we all used to way back when. Dont give me this crap that the world is more dangerous. Its not. Its the prevalence of the 24/7/365 news organizations and their fetish with reporting stories that happen to kids anywhere in such a sensational manner so they can sell BS product advertising and scare the crap out of parents. NOTHING HAS CHANGED, people are as fucked up as they've always been. Only now parents are scaredie-cats and kids arent allow to be kids anymore.

    As I said, Fucked Up World.

  137. Hippie Punching comment by Uberbah · · Score: 2

    So a parent whining about "pornography" - an inherently conservative position - is the fault of the left? And there is one thing that helps to stop stupid crap like this in it's tracks: teacher's unions.

    I wonder how conservatives maintain the disconnect between complaining over nontroversies like Ender's Gate threatening a teacher AND then with a straight face claim that our schools will magically improve when we kill off the last teacher's union.

  138. Persecution by ehiris · · Score: 1

    Even if it was pornographic, which it really isn't, the constitution protects all speech.

    This is another form of persecution brought to you by those who are sustained through "anti-persecution" politics.

    The bible is definitely more pornographic and more violent than Ender's game.

  139. Mighter than the sword ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The penis not mightier than the sword apparentely...

  140. You stay classy South Carolina by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    Seriously, how bad would secession be? If we gave the southern states an out and shipped all the right wing extremists to the south and they could ship their liberals north.

    America would be a better country without the south.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  141. Buggers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the Buggers are different from what the parents are thinking... Just ask the kids father, he knows.

  142. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait. You mean the first version of the story isn't accurate, and we shouldn't jump to conclusions? go to hell, dude.

  143. So many word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many word and he can't be bothered to give the true name of his god, but rather use a throw awaay generic name. Hint mr Pastor guy : the name of your god is YHWH. Stop using a generic appelation like "god" as if it was the only and single one the other not existing... Oh actually scratch that you have no evidence of YHWH existing. Carry on.

  144. Apparently these parents haven't read the Bible by BLToday · · Score: 1

    There's so much porn and gay sex going on in there for a thousand protests.

    What I want is for someone to rewrite the bible stories without any of the religious text. Let's see how long before we get a good old fashion book burning.

  145. For someone who hasn't read it... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    ...what's the extent and context of this 'porn'? I assume it's alot like the mass effect lesbian alien porn fiasco.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  146. Movie is coming out next year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enders_game

    wouldn't surprise me if this whole thing is about creating a buzz around it.

  147. It's the complainers by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

    My 9th grade social studies teacher showed us the movie "Shane" in class. No, I don't know why. Anyone complain? No. Well, I was taken aback that I saw some guy get shot in the face in school, but whatever.

    My local school showed my kid Trojans around the same grade. Did I complain? No. Thought it was dumb (what does English have to do with movies? Heh.), but not a stoning offense.

    Some people are just ready to bitch and squeak to get their way, no matter what.

    --
    Anything is possible given time and money.
  148. Lots of updates .... by will_die · · Score: 2

    There have been a lots of updates since this summary was written.
    The reading on pornographic material was separate material and not in the books mentioned. It may or may not of happened.
    The complaint from the parent mentions swearing and use of guns and violence.

    1. Re:Lots of updates .... by spacetimeExecuter+ · · Score: 1

      There have been a lots of updates since this summary was written. The reading on pornographic material was separate material and not in the books mentioned. It may or may not of happened. The complaint from the parent mentions swearing and use of guns and violence.

      there's the complaint i was expecting. the violence, yes, but guns? really, people? are guns that bad? don't ever send your kid into the real world, then. oh no, drugs, oh my, guns and violence everywhere! no. don't shelter your kids like this. it only hurts them in the end.

      --
      thank you for your time. ~spacetimeExecuter
  149. Dear Aiken Co School Board by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    and the idiots behind getting this teacher in "trouble":

    Fuck. You.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  150. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by Nimey · · Score: 1

    If only you could do that /and/ temp-ban the Slashdot editor "responsible" for this story, on account of not bothering to fact-check.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  151. Ender's Game is as tame as it gets! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    Ender's Game was written by a serious Mormon who worked hard to make it content-appropriate for Mormon children. I think he succeeded, and what's more, the book is just great. That somebody in the US could out-prude the Mormons ... that's just depressing.

  152. ignorance is stupidity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was Juliet only 12 in Shakespears 'Romeo and Juliet' ? But I guess thats way beyond anything in redneck country or is it required reading (comic book form only).

  153. The coming revolt of the guards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Howard Zinn: http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/zinncomrev24.html "However, the unexpected victories-even temporary ones-of insurgents show the vulnerability of the supposedly powerful. In a highly developed society, the Establishment cannot survive without the obedience and loyalty of millions of people who are given small rewards to keep the system going: the soldiers and police, teachers and ministers, administrators and social workers, technicians and production workers, doctors, lawyers, nurses, transport and communications workers, garbage men and firemen. These people-the employed, the somewhat privileged-are drawn into alliance with the elite. They become the guards of the system, buffers between the upper and lower classes. If they stop obeying, the system falls. That will happen, I think, only when all of us who are slightly privileged and slightly uneasy begin to see that we are like the guards in the prison uprising at Attica -- expendable; that the Establishment, whatever rewards it gives us, will also, if necessary to maintain its control, kill us. "

  154. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    It's the bible bangers who've brought about the climate in which this kind of situation is allowed to happen, so the comments disparaging them are still relevant.

    (When isn't it relevant to verbally assault religious people?)

  155. i don't usually post... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck this stupid dumb religious hick country where anyone can sue anyone over the lamest shit. I'm sorry - but this country is absolute sick to the core.

  156. It's not about the pron. by Organic+Brain+Damage · · Score: 1

    The problem with exposing our children to Ender's Game is that it's a gateway book to a whole mess of utter crap written by Card.

  157. Fuckin merrykins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Literally. Wont sombody think of the children. Does this apply to the bible as well?

    1. Re:Fuckin merrykins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the rest of the thread, numptie.

  158. Clearly, the book is not the problem... by billybob_jcv · · Score: 1

    ...the real problem is teaching the kids to read in the first place. Readin', Ritin' & Rithmatick is the Devil's work.
     

  159. Intolerant fearmongers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those living in the U.S.A....might watch out, more and more rights by the day are being taken away. It is insane! and the insanity is being led by fearmongers and religious zealots. Book burning is not so far away. And you women out there, better wake up. Female rights are being revoked by the truck load, including those about your own body. I'm ashamed of the U.S.A.

  160. School Boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and upper level school administration will NOT back the teachers. Why not ? Because it's cheaper to bend over backwards to placate even the most "out-in-left-field" parent than it is to fight them when they start throwing lawsuits around. A friend of mine finally threw in the towel after fifteen years. Changing careers completely because of the silly bullshit the schools are demanding of the teachers these days. Just not worth it anymore.

    Why anyone wants to be an educator in the current era US of A education system is beyond me.

    You can't teach anything anymore except what the answers will be to the ( Insert current standardized test here ).
    You can't touch students at all. In some cases ( special education ) you can't even discipline them
    No matter how careful you are about the subject matter, some idiot will object to it somewhere putting your job on the line.

    You will end up nothing more than a glorified babysitter killing yourself trying to keep up with the demands of bible-thumping parents, each of which are trying to shape the education system to more closely resemble their own ideals.

    1. Re:School Boards by plover · · Score: 1

      The answer is we need more negative reinforcement.

      We need people to sue because they removed literature from our children's hands, depriving them of a quality education. We need every non-nutjob parent in that class to sue the schoolboard because they fired a valuable teacher that was really connecting with their children. We need the school boards to learn that throwing the teacher under the bus has worse consequences by a factor of 20 than defending them against that one useless waster of free oxygen. Until we stop rolling over as parents of children who are getting screwed over by these bad school boards, we will continue to have nutjobs selecting the pablum they feed our kids.

      --
      John
  161. 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who wants to see 1984 read aloud to kids now to see if a teacher gets suspended/book banned/etc?

  162. As a Teacher... by SmarterThanMe · · Score: 2

    I can't say that this situation is all that unusual. Parents, particularly parents who are stay-at-home, have way too much time on their hands and involve themselves up to their armpits in the lives of their children. I have worked at schools where parents arrive at the schoolgrounds at lunchtime, and hang around on campus until the end of the day. For several weeks, parents lined up against the windows of one of the classrooms and stared at their children in class for the hour and fifteen minutes from the end of lunch to the end of the day. This continued until the teacher posted artwork blocking the parents view into the classroom from those windows. The parents promptly complained to the principal, and the teacher was ordered to take them down. That teacher (and almost every other teacher at the school) refuses to teach in that exposed classroom.

    I've been the subject of ridiculous complaints also. I was too hard on a kid when I separated him for calling one of the girls a "cheating dog" (for using a calculator during a maths activity where I had explicitly allowed the class to use calculators). I take the roll at the wrong time of the day. I set too much homework (and, conversely, I don't set enough homework; a complaint made by the same parent). I don't hand notes out (I prefer to lay out the notes at the front of the class, and the kids are meant to pick them up as they leave). I don't insist that someone's little baby (senior elementary student) wear a raincoat if it looks rainy outside, and I don't help that student to put that raincoat on. I drink Ginger Beer which comes in a bottle that looks like it's a bottle of real beer (that it isn't is beside the point also, because Ginger Beer has the word "beer" in it, and therefore, I'm setting a poor example to students). I advocate the use of facebook (which is actually Edmodo, which, I'll admit, does look a lot like facebook, but isn't). I am biased against or for particular students because I select them for debate teams, public speaking competitions or sport (sometimes I am still biased against particular students when I'm not involved at all in the selection or non-selection of them for various opportunities). On and on and on. Most of these complaints are, as other commenters have noted, housewives with too much time on their hands. I can't tell you how much I appreciate that I have had a good principal who, for the most part, only wastes a little bit of her and my time every so often to investigate and respond to these claims.

    That being said, I think that teachers and educational institutions have to acknowledge some responsibility in allowing this to happen. We encourage a dialogue between parents and teachers on an equal level, and we don't say all that much when unqualified pundits make educational claims that are simply wrong. Anyone, no matter how unqualified, will happily make claims about education and expect that those claims have equal footing with qualifie

  163. Summer reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read this book from summer reading assigned from my high school.

  164. Re:Teacher is in trouble for reading actual porn.. by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

    Without further information, that claim may actually come from the parent. It's the most probable case, since no other kid/parent has complained yet.

    --
    I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
  165. Re:Gotta love the religious types by amiga3D · · Score: 0

    Funny thing is, if you actually read the Bible, God does not actually promise not to destroy the Earth. In Revelations in fact, the future demise of this planet is prophesised. It never fails to amaze me how many of these guys that go about spouting about God have never read the Bible.

  166. Contact Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't actually ever posted on slashdot before, but I feel I should. I have written an email (no profanity) to the staff expressing *my* concerns.

    Here are the emails of their faculty:
    Jacki Barnwell
    jbarnwell@aiken.k12.sc.us
    Susan Varallo
    svarallo@aiken.K12.sc.us
    Phone: 803-641-2770
    Mrs. Schofield
    pschofield@aiken.k12.sc.us

    I am currently in the process of writing emails to the school board. Their contact info (too much to be posted here) can be found here:
    http://school-board.acps.schoolfusion.us/modules/groups/integrated_home.phtml?&gid=2300611&

    I know none of you are "into protesting," but I feel as nerds, it is very important that we make our thoughts known. These guys are from a middle school in a small town, and I'm sure a flood of (reasonable, logical, and levelheaded) emails will be addressed. Make a difference, let them know.

  167. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Gryle · · Score: 1

    "Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea." Revelation 21:1

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  168. Probably a liberal by Quila · · Score: 1

    Orson Scott Card is quite conservative, and his works show it.

    This could have been simply a liberal pissed off that a leftist book actually depicting gay interracial anal gang-bangs wasn't read to the class instead.

  169. Re:Teacher is in trouble for reading actual porn.. by Xacid · · Score: 1

    No mod points here but came across that too. Thanks for posting!

  170. Seriously, Orson Scott Card writing filth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This blows my mind! I know about Orson Scott Card a bit, even talked to people that know him and his family. I have to say that he is rather moral and religious person. I know several religious family's that have their children read Enders Game. A 10 year old in my church congregation introduced and lent me his copy of Enders Game. I can't think of single part that was inappropriate for minors. I don't understand what they are objecting about.

  171. fair is fair...she should step forward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the complaint, complete with the mother's name and address, as well as the name of the teacher involved:

    http://media.graytvinc.com/documents/SchofieldSchool-PornInvestigation.pdf

    Here is where she works:

    http://www.myvetonline.com/silverbluffah/general-information.html ...if Mr. Culp's name and work place is out there, HER name should be out there as well. What an idiot.

  172. I Went to This School by HisOmniscience · · Score: 1

    I went to this school (quite a few years ago), and while infuriating, I don't find it surprising. Also, it wasn't just Ender's Game; the teacher also complained about the teacher reading "The Devil's Paintbox" by Victoria McKernan and "Curtain: Poirot's Last Case" by Agatha Christie: local newspaper.

    The child had been disciplined by the teacher several times earlier in the year, so this is revenge by the parent.

  173. What kind of moron thinks it's pornographic? by meerling · · Score: 1

    I read this when it first came out, I was 17. It is NOT pornographic. Heck, it's not even slightly risque.

    You want something that borders on pornographic and still isn't, try looking at some some of those romance novels.
    The average television commercial is far closer to pornographic than "Ender's Game".

    I think some people down there need to be introduced to a clue by four, or I would if I thought they had any functioning brain cells left to be jump started by it.

  174. Honestly? by Altaile · · Score: 1

    Ender's game is easily one of the greatest books of all time. It's the story of a child genius. If more kids aspired to be smart like the children in the book, the world would be a better place. Not reading a book won't protect children from the read world.

    --
    They're screaming blue murder.
  175. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

    Funny thing is, if you actually read the Bible, God does not actually promise not to destroy the Earth.

    Maybe God doesn't, but the LORD comes pretty close:

    The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again will I curse the ground because of humans, even though every inclination of the human heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done." -- Gen 8:22

    OTOH, as the very next verse implies "[a]s long as the earth endures ...," He doesn't promise to save it from destruction either.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  176. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

    That would be Gen 8:21, of course

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  177. prosaic: ??? give this (wo?)man a dictionary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that word means what you think it means.

  178. belstaffsale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a great blog! It is a pity that I can not find RRS address. If RRS offers a subscription service, I can easily follow your blog! belstaff mens boot

  179. Those who can't teach -- run for school board! by Randym · · Score: 1
    Here's a teachable moment in civics: organize the students to recall the school board -- for living in the wrong century. I don't which century they are living in, but it clearly isn't the 21st.

    Oh wait....South Carolina? I think they stopped comprehending civics in 1860.

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  180. The Trinity Explained - God is like a Shamrock by DarthSmeg · · Score: 1

    God is like a shamrock. He's small, green and split three ways

    --
    Tarald - The Lord of Smeg
    You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on
  181. Re:"Broken?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats really fucked up for these type of moron students and parents, besides telling Johnny or Susie to not become gay, even tho they raise them without ever teaching them about sex, SEX it is forbidden. I never want to hear the word pussy or even vagina, you should only know it will help grow our idiot breed of socialist humans. Somthing I have noticed it, it seems most gays are gay because they grew up in strict religious and there oppressive anti sex BS.

    For a group of people who are forbidden to think about sex they sure as hell have really fucked up perverted minds to constantly find something pornographic in anything and everything. If you thought the current Federal Government was a horrible idea, can you imagine how fucked we would be if the South won the Civil War.
    Having said that you see the same behavior in the northern states.

  182. lulz amuuriccaahhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    america is so gay....

  183. what do you mean? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    is this comment about how the book discussed brutal warfare, or saying Sherman was justified in laying waste to SC?

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  184. Contacts his HR department by Vernes · · Score: 1

    So, education? Where did you study? South Carolina? I see... No, that would be all, we'll contact you later this month, thanks for coming.

  185. of course, we coud always burn the book.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://xkcd.com/750/

  186. There's been an update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's been an update, Ed needs to update the summary:
    http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=19661650&title=teacher-suspended-for-reading-pornographic-material-in-enders-game

    The important part to note is as follows, and is a statement from Orson Scott Card:

    "But Card told the Doug Wright Show, the way he understands it, the teacher had also been reading inappropriate material off the Internet to the class. Card believes the parent must have looked at the reading list, saw "Ender's Game," and got upset.

    So it sounds like Mommy is indeed a dumb Bitch who is making a knee-jerk reaction, but she might have actually had a real complaint.

  187. Not sure it was the book by metacell · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Update 2: According to an update at io9:

    According to a news report by local station WRDW, the police incident report in the case claims that the teacher read “pornographic material from the Internet to the students in class. One of the stories was about prostitutes having their faces covered with ejaculation.” But according to the WRDW report, the school is still maintaining that the offending material was just three books that the teacher read to class, which were primarily offensive due to swear words. (Thanks to AJRimmer for pointing us to this.)

  188. i think it's time for a chat... by spongman · · Score: 1
  189. RE: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, whoever did this did not do their research. This is why you don't use sparknotes!

  190. Buggers by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    The bad guys in Ender's game are called Buggers aren't they? In the UK, a bugger is someone who indulges in anal sex. Anal sex being called buggery in some circles (as it were). Just wondering if the mum in question picked up on that? More likely she's just barking mad though and frankly more of a danger to her kid's mental wellbeing that this book.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  191. Re:Gotta love the religious types by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Informative

    More importantly. God promises he won't destroy it "with water, but will do so with fire" (which is what revelations then details... but contrary to the good congresscritter, it only speaks about what God will do. It never says "you will not destroy yourselves."

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  192. Cha Ching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should definitely help OSC sell more books and more people will know how great this story is. There is no such thing as bad press.

  193. Re:"Broken?" by TrogL · · Score: 1

    >it seems most gays are gay because they grew up in strict religious and there oppressive anti sex BS I take it you've missed the entire "born that way" meme. Gays are gay because, well, they're gay. Most go about their lives quietly under the radar. The tragedies we hear about are the ones who are in the public eye due to evangelicalism (especially televangelism) and then run off the rails either because they've been outed or they can't keep up the cognitive dissonance. Others come into the public eye because their lives have become a train wreck because of religion, not because they're gay.

  194. Not just America by coder111 · · Score: 1

    I've heard idiots in Lithuanian government tried to ban Carl Sagan's "Demon-Haunted World" thinking it was satanist literature as it is listed as recommended reading in:

    http://www.satan.lt/Video_audio_knygos/Antireliginiai_video_audio_knygos#Knygos

    which is a "satanist" page :) If you actually take time to read what's on that page, it's 100% pure atheism/scepticism, no Satan worship involved. This was several years ago. Well, thankfully someone explained them who Carl Sagan is and what is that book all about. I have a strong suspicion 99% of people who want to ban books haven't read the books they want to ban and have no clue what they are talking about. Ignorance rules again.

    --Coder

  195. Brave New World by phorm · · Score: 1

    Good thing he didn't read that one out, or he'd be charged with dissemination of child pr0n...

  196. 1985 by xcix · · Score: 1

    Doesn't 1985 have umm actual sex? I just started reading the "Tale of Two Cities", the scene where Madame Manette reunites with her father is disturbing incestuous and erotic. Is the shower fight seen between two boys? Maybe the lady has another problem on her mind. Because it's still socially acceptable to bet up on pornography but not homosexuality.

  197. is it weird to feel personally offended? -ender89 by ender89 · · Score: 1

    I read that book way back when in middle school, where it was actually part of the curriculum for some. And I later met orson Scott card, who is a Mormon and probably on a short list for "least sensual writer ever". I can verify that there is no sex in enders game, cause I would have found it. Its outrageous that someone could lose their job over what was probably the defining book of my adolescence, and for false charges as well. I wish the south would "rise again" just so the rest of the country could slap some sense into them.

  198. Orson Scott Card is against Porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ironic thing is the author Orson Scott Card is a Mormon (LDS) Science fiction author.
    If anything Mormons are against more its porn and sexuality.

  199. Glad but for the reason by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'd read too much science fiction already. Didn't much like this book.

  200. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

    "Never again will I curse the ground because of humans">

    The apocalypse isn't "because of humans", it was a part of the plan from the beginning.

  201. I thought this book burning was over... by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

    ...let me guess, the mother was Muslim and was offended that ants had human-like intelligence as this is an affront to Allah, Invisible Man of the Middle East?

    --
    There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
  202. Resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a local paper, the police investigation is closed and the teacher is not being criminally charged. [ http://www.aikenstandard.com/story/032112-middle-school-teacher-investigation--3877085 ]

    That outcome pretty much puts paid to the pornography charges -- there would not have been any in the Agatha Christie book, and anyone who's read Ender's Game knows there is no pornography in it, which leaves The Devil's Paintbox. I haven't read it (yet - I get it from the library this weekend), but it is a young adult western type book and while reviews say that it does mention prostitutes, I somewhat doubt that it was as explicit as "prostitutes having their faces covered with ejaculation", which is what the report filed with the police claimed.

    There were also reports that the teacher had read the pornography off the internet, and counter-reports that no, people were confused because he'd been reading the books from a Kindle or Nook. Regardless, the police must have found that to be unsubstantiated as well.

    What remains is the trouble he's in for apparently teaching the books without submitting them for review. Since the school has since declared two of the three books inappropriate for middle-schoolers due to language and subject matter (unfortunately, I've been able to find nothing more specific than that as to the details), the consequences of this little debacle will be that students in that school district will be out a couple of good reads.

  203. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That will place the time line to about 2-3 billion years from now. It's a very cool, I mean warm, prophecy which will inevitable happen.

  204. children and violence and 'porn' oh my by spacetimeExecuter+ · · Score: 1

    i would just like to say that i read Ender's Game when i was in... oh, sixth grade or so. i absolutely adored it, and have been a die-hard OSC fan ever since. my innocent little mind found no problem with the book. he took a damn shower. alert the presses. however, i do find it rather amusing that there was no complaint of violence or discrimination. if i were a parent, that would probably be my primary complaint. (if i were hopelessly devoted to my little snookums and wanted no harm to befall him) i can't see how it's the teacher's fault, though. Ender's Game is a great book, and i'd say that anyone over the mental age of eight would enjoy it. it's stories like these that make me realize that common sense really isn't all that common. FACEPALM X2 COMBO

    --
    thank you for your time. ~spacetimeExecuter
  205. The idiot probably heard the slang name for aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I remember the book correctly, they referred to the aliens as Buggers. That's probably all this idiot parent had to hear to go storming off the the principal.

    Rather than suspend the teacher, I think they should suspend the parent - clearly not smart enough to be rather children.

    Biggest problem we have today - the smart people aren't reproducing, while the morons are reproducing like rabbits...

  206. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

    The apocalypse isn't "because of humans", it was a part of the plan from the beginning.

    [Citation Required] and please not from Revelations, which as we now know is not a prophetic vision, but a contemporary political cartoon. ;)

    One problem with your interpretation is that the next sentence --And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done --is phrased independently of humans. More importantly putting this quote in context, what was "because of humans," of course, was the flood. It would be overly legalistic to imagine that the author intended by this to qualify Yahweh's promise not (actively) to destroy the earth in future. We should also note that in the next chapter, by contrast, Elohim merely promises not to flood the earth again.

    Now that I have seen the true OP (modded to zero), I will have to concede that in the context of a wide-eyed inerrantist congressman too close to power and too far from professional help, it is a little churlish of me to complain about an overly legalistic (and ahistorical) reading of the text. And moreover, he is hardly likely to defer to an historically grounded understanding of Revelations, is he?

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  207. Latest news from the local paper by superflippy · · Score: 1

    Wonderful. So this is how the small town I live in makes the national news.
    Anyway, the upshot as of today is that nobody is going to press charges against anybody. And it wasn't just Ender's Game that was a concern. There were two other books as well: The Devil's Paintbox by Victoria McKernan and Curtain by Agatha Christie
    Here's the latest: Schofield Teacher Won't Face Criminal Charges

    --
    Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  208. What part? by Githaron · · Score: 1

    I just read that book a week ago. What part is pornographic? There are a couple parts where the boys were naked because they were in the shower and one part where they kids were forced to leave the barracks naked because they took too long to get dressed but there were not any sexual references or acts in the whole book.

  209. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's 8:21, not 8:22.

    Note that God actually promises never again to curse the ground. This is a reflection of the original curse; the ground is already cursed, and will remain cursed until this earth is destroyed and a new heaven and new earth are created. God promises that he will not curse the ground because of humans, so the new earth will never be cursed. The flood could have also been considered a second curse, since it covered all of the ground, making it incapable (temporarily) of supporting life, which is what is mentioned next, where "all living creatures" (which were on the face of the ground: i.e. Noah and the creatures in the Ark were not "on the face of the ground" during the flood, and were saved from the curse).

    And, like you said, in verse 22 (the verse after the one you quoted), he pretty clearly implies that the earth might not be around forever.

  210. Re:According to original report it wasn't Enders G by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    That's a lovely tautology you're wearing. Where did you get it?

    So let's see:
    1. you go into histrionics about something you think I did
    2. it turns out I didn't do it
    3. you claim that's irrelevant, because 'all that other stuff I did' made you prone to throw that hissy anyway
    4. ...
    5. Profit?!

    --
    -Styopa
  211. TRUTH ACTUALLY MUNDANE! by As_I_Please · · Score: 2

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/03/21/south-carolina-teacher-suspended-for-reading-students-enders-game-will-not-face-criminal-charges/

    In short, a parent's overreaction caused the school's overreaction. The teacher will get a "slap on the wrist" for including materials without following proper procedure. There will be no criminal charges.

    Oh, and the reading of internet stories about prostitutes was a complete fabrication.

  212. oh how I hate stupid people by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming the parent never heard of the book and found this page http://plover.net/~bonds/ender.html

    I guess the parent didn't read the end of that article. Stupidity in all its forms is an ugly festering chimera. When you stamp out the ignorance of one, two more pop up in its place.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  213. Re:The idiot probably heard the slang name for ali by DragonTHC · · Score: 1
    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  214. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing about Revelation that specifically says it's about the end of the world. Some Christians, notably Catholics, don't take it that way.

  215. South Carolina by zildgulf · · Score: 1

    This is even more evidence that South Carolina is just plain weird and wacky. That's why North Carolina didn't want South Carolina or its people even back in Colonial times.

    If you don't understand and you are not from South Carolina, just go there for a while and you will understand.

  216. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

    God's a Cylon?

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  217. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Automatic failover! Aw3350m3!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  218. Must disagree. Hook them by reading to them by lenski · · Score: 1

    Get'em hooked, and watch them go.

    A student teacher read a story aloud to a class that I attended (fifth grade, I think): From that moment until my mid-40's I was a voracious reader (too busy with work and fixing up houses since then...). I imagine a significant fraction of the other students in the class followed the same pattern.

    Showing the kids that there's a whole world in there is a great way to get them into reading.

    That student teacher did us all a giant favor. Fines? No, perhaps a bonus instead.

  219. Re:Gotta love the religious types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ThanK you Verry Many

    Friv

    Kizi

    Juegos Friv

  220. Re:Fermion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>So Ender's Game, though written by a very traditional homophobe, certainly challenges the conservative world view and does not end well. Though the male dominated world is validated, there is an indication that doning anything to win a war. As so often happens, single incidences in the book are used to provide cover for objections that is really about general content. In effect, too many parents are afraid when their children learn to think.

    You might want to read the sci-fi book he wrote about the Castratii, "Songmaster" before you accuse him of being a homophobe.

  221. Heh I had to read Flowers for Algernon at that age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a pornographic view Flowers for Algernon was much more sexually explicit, since you know it had sex in it. No Hamlet either I guess since it hes sex and incest.

  222. The Bible if more graphic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. if you can get through the old "modern" Englsh, you'll easily find references to young women lying with certain close relations.

  223. The REAL danger of Ender's Game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is the moderately intelligent comparing themselves to Ender because they read a book about smart people and suddenly want to pretend to be smart. All of a sudden they want to model everything they can after Ender (or Bean) because they think it will make them appear brilliant.