You can't really pardon someone who has not been convicted of crime.
There is no such limitation on pardons granted by the president.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.
So really it looks like for some period the Royal Navy simply won't have the capability to fight other warships except with their seven submarines. This means they can't really contest command of the sea anywhere or project military power without assistance from the US.
They will not be able to maintain command of the sea but their submarines can sure deny the same to an enemy.
What you're saying makes no sense whatsoever. Congress passed the law, and the law only applies to Congress since they're the only relevant party (other than the President). Consequently, what would be the point of doing that if it has no value whatsoever (which is what you're arguing)?
Publicity?
Congress cannot pass a law that they cannot ignore.
3) You mean to tell me that they don't already have this?
They do, but it requires they write checks to representatives and senators every decade or two to extend it again. If Disney could get rid of that pesky "limited" word in Article 1, Section 8, they could forego the cost of pretending it isn't de-facto unlimited copyright.
"Limited" is not a problem. The USSC ruled that as long as a finite duration is specified, then it meets the requirements for "limited".
This is something sci-fi never fully discloses: hey, see that in the telescope? Let's go! Wait, where the fuck is it??
It is disclosed sometimes if it matters although not by Hollywood. Just travel in the opposite direction. If it happened 1000 years ago, then move 1000 light years further back and use the telescope to watch what happened in real time.
The NRA of course also supported gun control in various flavors at the time and earlier. So had the gun industry when it meant choking off imports hence the "sporting use" and other requirements.
Given Trump's previous views on gun control, I am not sanguine. At least Hillary would have been in conflict with a Republican Congress although I doubt that would have stopped her.
The other standards you mention lack galvanic isolation which is important once you travel 10s of meters, between power systems, or in non-benign environments. Distance is also a problem. The various high speed standards might be acceptable within a rack or between adjacent racks but longer distances are needed.
I am sure what they would prefer is a brand new protocol build on the ethernet physical interface but that would give up the economy of scale of existing ethernet ASICs.
Besides being cheap which is always nice, ethernet has the advantage of being galvanically isolated at both ends making it suitable for industrial and building to building applications. I love it for test instrumentation for the same reason. Yes, you can always add galvanic isolation to other interfaces (although this can be very difficult in some cases) but ethernet has it built in.
The US hasn't actually charged Assange with anything. Obama can't pardon someone for crimes that don't exist; he also can't pardon someone on behalf of another country (Sweden).
Nixon was not charged with anything when Ford pardoned him for "any crimes he might have committed against the United States while president."
I consider social progress, among other things, as anything that moves the nation away from any imposition of coercive force contrary to the personal and consensual choices of the citizens.
Even at the expense of federalism?
The complaint is not about the decision that women should control of their own bodies; it is about the USSC further undermining federalism.
This mass of people will not go away, then the super-rich will have three choices:
A) Build a robot army of exterminators to eliminate the "surplus people" (me, you, anyone that is not super-rich); B) Do nothing and be killed sooner or later in the wake of the mass of hungry and desperate people; C) Use a portion of the billions obtained through automation and create a basic income to avoid the consequences of option B;
I've been advocating law experation without renewal for years. It forces elected legislatures to review previous generations' laws for problems and continued validity.
It also creates a public record of what they support.
Slashdot Mirror
If the solar shingles are thick tempered glass or maybe even better, tempered and laminated glass, then I doubt they will have any problems.
What I would worry about is the electrical connections which will have to stand up to the environment and being walked on.
You can't really pardon someone who has not been convicted of crime.
There is no such limitation on pardons granted by the president.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki...
And I would prefer 100% less fire.
The problem is HOW do you patch it.
It is easy. Do what Apple does and remove the ports while requiring users to buy new systems.
So really it looks like for some period the Royal Navy simply won't have the capability to fight other warships except with their seven submarines. This means they can't really contest command of the sea anywhere or project military power without assistance from the US.
They will not be able to maintain command of the sea but their submarines can sure deny the same to an enemy.
What you're saying makes no sense whatsoever. Congress passed the law, and the law only applies to Congress since they're the only relevant party (other than the President). Consequently, what would be the point of doing that if it has no value whatsoever (which is what you're arguing)?
Publicity?
Congress cannot pass a law that they cannot ignore.
3) You mean to tell me that they don't already have this?
They do, but it requires they write checks to representatives and senators every decade or two to extend it again. If Disney could get rid of that pesky "limited" word in Article 1, Section 8, they could forego the cost of pretending it isn't de-facto unlimited copyright.
"Limited" is not a problem. The USSC ruled that as long as a finite duration is specified, then it meets the requirements for "limited".
Why hasn't this CEO already been arrested like this guy?
http://www.wkyc.com/news/crime...
Unless there is the "simple physics hack" space travel will be a royal pain in the ass when you take the planning that is involved.
We never did do any of our experiments beyond the local singularity. Obscure?
This is something sci-fi never fully discloses: hey, see that in the telescope? Let's go! Wait, where the fuck is it??
It is disclosed sometimes if it matters although not by Hollywood. Just travel in the opposite direction. If it happened 1000 years ago, then move 1000 light years further back and use the telescope to watch what happened in real time.
Reagan signed the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 after banning open carry as governor of California. Bush senior signed the Gun Free School Zone act making unlicensed open and concealed carry of state citizens and all open and concealed carry by out of state citizens unlawful and of course there was the Assault Weapon Ban.
The NRA of course also supported gun control in various flavors at the time and earlier. So had the gun industry when it meant choking off imports hence the "sporting use" and other requirements.
Given Trump's previous views on gun control, I am not sanguine. At least Hillary would have been in conflict with a Republican Congress although I doubt that would have stopped her.
The other standards you mention lack galvanic isolation which is important once you travel 10s of meters, between power systems, or in non-benign environments. Distance is also a problem. The various high speed standards might be acceptable within a rack or between adjacent racks but longer distances are needed.
I am sure what they would prefer is a brand new protocol build on the ethernet physical interface but that would give up the economy of scale of existing ethernet ASICs.
Besides being cheap which is always nice, ethernet has the advantage of being galvanically isolated at both ends making it suitable for industrial and building to building applications. I love it for test instrumentation for the same reason. Yes, you can always add galvanic isolation to other interfaces (although this can be very difficult in some cases) but ethernet has it built in.
The US hasn't actually charged Assange with anything. Obama can't pardon someone for crimes that don't exist; he also can't pardon someone on behalf of another country (Sweden).
Nixon was not charged with anything when Ford pardoned him for "any crimes he might have committed against the United States while president."
Mike Bloomberg is a Republican. Mike Bloomberg supports gun control. Therefore, by your logic, being in favor of gun control makes you a conservative.
Reagan and Bush were supporters of gun control as well and actually passed laws in that direction.
It was a gas main explosion.
Maybe Obama should have banned transporting the oil via truck and train then also.
The best part is if you do it right, you can bet on both for twice the price.
There are plenty to choose from and pretty much all will be better than the two party system.
Why would the two parties want that?
I consider social progress, among other things, as anything that moves the nation away from any imposition of coercive force contrary to the personal and consensual choices of the citizens.
Even at the expense of federalism?
The complaint is not about the decision that women should control of their own bodies; it is about the USSC further undermining federalism.
What makes you think Senators would make better projectiles?
Who cares? Let's try it and find out.
This mass of people will not go away, then the super-rich will have three choices:
A) Build a robot army of exterminators to eliminate the "surplus people" (me, you, anyone that is not super-rich);
B) Do nothing and be killed sooner or later in the wake of the mass of hungry and desperate people;
C) Use a portion of the billions obtained through automation and create a basic income to avoid the consequences of option B;
D) Imprison them.
While 365 d/y is fixed, but everything else can be changed.
The problem is that 365 d/y is fixed at about 365.24.
This is not Windows 10's fault. The game dev and/or publisher is responsible for this.
I am sure Microsoft was all broken up about it.
I've been advocating law experation without renewal for years. It forces elected legislatures to review previous generations' laws for problems and continued validity.
It also creates a public record of what they support.