Yes, but then when you say "1 RPM," you're gramatically incorrect (1 Revolutions Per Minute). I tend to let RPM = Revolution Per Minute. Referring to RPM as its own unit, I then pluralize it, leading to RPMs.
Your statement is entirely accurate. I own a nomad now. I have used it for recording... but only for band rehersals. The pre-amp only has a little headroom so it distorts somewhat quickly. If it had S/PDIF, geez, it would be an industry killer. Mine was $300. You can get them now for a lot cheaper. Add a 20GB hard drive, and S/PDIF, and an eco-charge battery/charger system, and a bag of granola, and you're set. One more thing- USB 2.0 or IEEE 1394. Reason: Using USB takes a long time to transfer all those WAV files. The idea of taping say... all of Gathering of the Vibes with no tapes drives me giddy.
Yea, I was thinking, "isn't Carbon 12.011" and lo and behold... One must remember weights are based off of the Carbon 12 atom (isotope), not the fact that the Carbon has weight 12.
Yet, Apache uses that nice little TCP/IP stack that, shock, horror of horrors, is INTEGRATED in the kernel. And yes, KDE also is integrated with Konqueror, which happens to be the file browser as well as the internet browser. Gee, that sounds familiar. Personally I like it, keeps my browsing consistent. Kinda like how it's nice for IE to browse the internet and local directories.
Now I'd be all over this if it were RPN. Granted, an algebraic system is probly more convenient on a watch. But, I'm much too accustomed to using RPN. Using any algebraic calculator takes me too much time.
For those of you actually browsing at 0, the parent of this comment, which I wrote, was NOT redundant as the phrase "Concrete Mathematics" occurs nowhere else in the entire discussion.
Humor can make a great book even greater. In the margins of Concrete Mathematics (Knuth, Graham, Patashnik), theres actually somewhat of a "discussion" on two pages:
"It seems a lot of stuff is attributed to Gauss- either he was really smart or he had a great press agent."
"Maybe he just had a magnetic personality."
"Actually Gauss is often called the greatest mathematician of all time. So it's nice to be able to understand at least one of his discoveries."
I mean, come on, it doesn't get better than that. Here's a couple more:
"I see, we get 'real' functions by using imaginary numbers."
"Why is 'Euler' pronounced 'Oiler' when 'Euclid' is 'Yooklid'?"
"You know you're in college when the book doesn't tell you how to pronounce 'Dirichlet'."
"(The formula {0 or 1} stands for something that's either 0 or 1; we needn't commit ourselves, because the details don't really matter.)"
Hey, didn't you get a CTD 8000 working with the audio dat software for solaris under linux? If so I'd like to know if you had to patch the code to do it. -Thanks
So where do you draw the line? Am I allowed to put up firework making information but not allowed to put up bomb making information? Is the difference between innocence and guilt whether I say "pipe" or "paper shell"? You tell me because I'd sure like to know.
Hrmph. That's quite interesting. It makes sense that they can do it... I just didn't realize it was possible to monitor one client with multiple stations.
Let's assume he's an idiot and doesn't change the MAC address thats being used for the (R)ARP requests. What are the odds you're gonna find that same exact MAC address on another public wireless network? Are you gonna monitor every single one in the world in order to catch him? No. The address would have to be captured before it hits any router. You're not gonna be able to "trace" the MAC address back to some guy using 802.11 in his house.
How can you "still use it free"? You can't. You still need a physical layer, data link layer, and network layer connection upon which your VPN can operate. This is how they make their money.
Not likely they could triangulate you. Confine the search area to a radius around an access point? Yes. As far as I know you can't be connected to more than one access point at once so it really depends on one access point.
Nothing used to anger me more than when people would put NON-Lego components in Lego buildings, cars, etc. It bothered me to no end. Come to think of it, it still does. Grrrrrrr...
One "market" you don't want to try to defraud on ebay would be the survivalist/hunting/etc niche. Think about it. Imagine doing this to a group of 10 ex-marines who have weapons permits. Not my idea of a good time. Last thing I want at my door is a bunch of guys in BDUs grinning at me. On another note, a good thing to have here would be a friend who's a judge. Have him get you an arrest warrant and then have a bunch of bounty hunters execute it. Bounty hunters (usually ex-military guys) are literally above the law when it comes to finding people who have warrants out for them.
And how does having the ability to restrict the number of layer 2 addresses per port help the cable company. They see one and ONLY one MAC address when you're NAT'ing. That MAC is the MAC of the device doing the NAT'ing.
I understand your point. However, that doesn't exemplify the majority of Ask Slashdot posters. There are many resources you can exhaust before coming to Ask Slashdot. Only then should you write in. The RTFM attitude is helpful to everybody. It teaches you to read a little better and it keeps people with knowledge from having to waste their time answering petty questions that are already documented.
There's a difference between a legal monopoly and an illegal monopoly. AOL Time Warner isn't actively trying to make itself the ONLY news source. Microsoft is actively trying to make itself the only EVERYTHING. Don't make comments when you don't accurately understand the difference between legal and illegal monopolies.
Uhm, I mean seriously. Did you really need an Ask Slashdot to figure this out? Apple has a website. I'll leave finding it as an exercise to the reader. Look up about MacOS X, you'll find its core is Darwin. Darwin is BSD based. What more do you want? Go to [insert chain computer store here] and play with a machine. Stop asking stupid questions you're too lazy to figure out on your own.
I would hate to be seeing Linux be eaten by the AOL corporation. Such a melange does not sit well with my stomach. The Linux communitie has a histoiry of innovation and openess which stands starkly in contrast to the average Americain grande corporation. It would be a pity to see that openness be suppressed.
Um, two things. First, you're implying Red Hat is Linux. This is not true. One should not say things about Linux which do not neccesarily apply to Red Hat. Second, Red Hat is a company just as much as AOL / Time Warner is a company. Just because they are a Linux company doesn't mean they aren't a company. They want to make money like everyone else. If Red Hat falls, personally, I could care less. GNU/Linux will survive with Red Hat alive or dead. Red Hat means next to nothing as far I'm concerned. And if you take the opinion that GNU/Linux development will take a considerable blow with no "real" companies backing it, you're wrong because that thought is disproved with counter examples. OpenBSD has no commercial backing really and it thrives.
Slashdot Mirror
John Nash (if the movie was right).
Yes, but then when you say "1 RPM," you're gramatically incorrect (1 Revolutions Per Minute). I tend to let RPM = Revolution Per Minute. Referring to RPM as its own unit, I then pluralize it, leading to RPMs.
Your statement is entirely accurate. I own a nomad now. I have used it for recording... but only for band rehersals. The pre-amp only has a little headroom so it distorts somewhat quickly. If it had S/PDIF, geez, it would be an industry killer. Mine was $300. You can get them now for a lot cheaper. Add a 20GB hard drive, and S/PDIF, and an eco-charge battery/charger system, and a bag of granola, and you're set. One more thing- USB 2.0 or IEEE 1394. Reason: Using USB takes a long time to transfer all those WAV files. The idea of taping say... all of Gathering of the Vibes with no tapes drives me giddy.
Yea, I was thinking, "isn't Carbon 12.011" and lo and behold... One must remember weights are based off of the Carbon 12 atom (isotope), not the fact that the Carbon has weight 12.
EXCELLENT IDEA! I think I might steal it. I started using the English spellings of Greek letters. Theres something funny about a box named mu.
Yet, Apache uses that nice little TCP/IP stack that, shock, horror of horrors, is INTEGRATED in the kernel. And yes, KDE also is integrated with Konqueror, which happens to be the file browser as well as the internet browser. Gee, that sounds familiar. Personally I like it, keeps my browsing consistent. Kinda like how it's nice for IE to browse the internet and local directories.
Now I'd be all over this if it were RPN. Granted, an algebraic system is probly more convenient on a watch. But, I'm much too accustomed to using RPN. Using any algebraic calculator takes me too much time.
For those of you actually browsing at 0, the parent of this comment, which I wrote, was NOT redundant as the phrase "Concrete Mathematics" occurs nowhere else in the entire discussion.
Humor can make a great book even greater. In the margins of Concrete Mathematics (Knuth, Graham, Patashnik), theres actually somewhat of a "discussion" on two pages:
"It seems a lot of stuff is attributed to Gauss- either he was really smart or he had a great press agent."
"Maybe he just had a magnetic personality."
"Actually Gauss is often called the greatest mathematician of all time. So it's nice to be able to understand at least one of his discoveries."
I mean, come on, it doesn't get better than that. Here's a couple more:
"I see, we get 'real' functions by using imaginary numbers."
"Why is 'Euler' pronounced 'Oiler' when 'Euclid' is 'Yooklid'?"
"You know you're in college when the book doesn't tell you how to pronounce 'Dirichlet'."
"(The formula {0 or 1} stands for something that's either 0 or 1; we needn't commit ourselves, because the details don't really matter.)"
Hey, didn't you get a CTD 8000 working with the audio dat software for solaris under linux? If so I'd like to know if you had to patch the code to do it. -Thanks
And those are cheap Neumanns. LOL. KM184s or something similar I take it?
So where do you draw the line? Am I allowed to put up firework making information but not allowed to put up bomb making information? Is the difference between innocence and guilt whether I say "pipe" or "paper shell"? You tell me because I'd sure like to know.
Darn. He wanted to be heard. He got it.
Hrmph. That's quite interesting. It makes sense that they can do it... I just didn't realize it was possible to monitor one client with multiple stations.
Woe, I said non-lego components, not just people. Anything non-lego is a no no.
Let's assume he's an idiot and doesn't change the MAC address thats being used for the (R)ARP requests. What are the odds you're gonna find that same exact MAC address on another public wireless network? Are you gonna monitor every single one in the world in order to catch him? No. The address would have to be captured before it hits any router. You're not gonna be able to "trace" the MAC address back to some guy using 802.11 in his house.
How can you "still use it free"? You can't. You still need a physical layer, data link layer, and network layer connection upon which your VPN can operate. This is how they make their money.
Not likely they could triangulate you. Confine the search area to a radius around an access point? Yes. As far as I know you can't be connected to more than one access point at once so it really depends on one access point.
Nothing used to anger me more than when people would put NON-Lego components in Lego buildings, cars, etc. It bothered me to no end. Come to think of it, it still does. Grrrrrrr...
One "market" you don't want to try to defraud on ebay would be the survivalist/hunting/etc niche. Think about it. Imagine doing this to a group of 10 ex-marines who have weapons permits. Not my idea of a good time. Last thing I want at my door is a bunch of guys in BDUs grinning at me. On another note, a good thing to have here would be a friend who's a judge. Have him get you an arrest warrant and then have a bunch of bounty hunters execute it. Bounty hunters (usually ex-military guys) are literally above the law when it comes to finding people who have warrants out for them.
And how does having the ability to restrict the number of layer 2 addresses per port help the cable company. They see one and ONLY one MAC address when you're NAT'ing. That MAC is the MAC of the device doing the NAT'ing.
I understand your point. However, that doesn't exemplify the majority of Ask Slashdot posters. There are many resources you can exhaust before coming to Ask Slashdot. Only then should you write in. The RTFM attitude is helpful to everybody. It teaches you to read a little better and it keeps people with knowledge from having to waste their time answering petty questions that are already documented.
There's a difference between a legal monopoly and an illegal monopoly. AOL Time Warner isn't actively trying to make itself the ONLY news source. Microsoft is actively trying to make itself the only EVERYTHING. Don't make comments when you don't accurately understand the difference between legal and illegal monopolies.
Uhm, I mean seriously. Did you really need an Ask Slashdot to figure this out? Apple has a website. I'll leave finding it as an exercise to the reader. Look up about MacOS X, you'll find its core is Darwin. Darwin is BSD based. What more do you want? Go to [insert chain computer store here] and play with a machine. Stop asking stupid questions you're too lazy to figure out on your own.
Disclosure: I have a stake in AOL / Time Warner.