Slashdot Mirror


Analog Tachometer PC Mod

greenape147 writes: "BurnOutPC has this review of a tachometer modification for your PC. The tachometer, made and sold by Xoxide, works via the serial port and displays the CPU utilization in RPM's! The classical look of this external tachometer is really nice to see after the "window phase" everyone seems to be going through. Not to mention the fact that analog meters are so fun to watch. Currently supported in Windows NT/2000/XP, a GNU/Linux driver is in the works."

222 comments

  1. Is there an open sdk for constolling it? by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Title says it all. I won't buy it unless I can reconfigure it and or use it other operating systems.

    1. Re:Is there an open sdk for constolling it? by mini+me · · Score: 1

      I suspect it isn't that difficult of a protocol to reverse engineer.
      Would be neat to do different things with it though, like bandwidth monitoring or use it as an actual tach for racing games.

    2. Re:Is there an open sdk for constolling it? by Hellraisr · · Score: 0

      I think it's a stupid idea
      most people are too busy using their computer to do important things - not watch some lame dial on their case which is probably hidden from view below the desk anyway

    3. Re:Is there an open sdk for constolling it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if there isn't an open sdk, by god, make your own tachometer+sdk mod.

    4. Re:Is there an open sdk for constolling it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already says a linux driver is in the works.

    5. Re:Is there an open sdk for constolling it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supported in Linux != open.

    6. Re:Is there an open sdk for constolling it? by Shanep · · Score: 2

      I was considering making an analog system occupancy meter months ago. It would be really easy too, through the parrallel port.

      Periodically write the occupancy to the parallel port, which could have a super-simple (tm) R2R digital to analog convertor (appropriately built for the low voltage requirement) hooked up to an analog meter.

      Last time I was experiementing with lpt ports, 10 years ago, the data was held on those lines until the next byte comes through, so no latch should be required.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  2. Cheating? by Lord+Puppet · · Score: 4, Funny

    When you want to sell the computer, is there a way that you can cheat and roll back the tachometer?

    "Oh, this baby's practically brand new..."

    1. Re:Cheating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking retard, must you post to Slashdot and reveal your immense stupidity to the rest of us long-suffering readers?

      Let's get this straight, shall we? A tachometer displays current engine RPM. That's revolutions per minute, moron.

      An _odometer_ displays distance traveled over the lifetime of a vehicle, and is what is typically "rolled back".

      Hope that helps...dumbass.

    2. Re:Cheating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, um ... it was obvious to the rest of us that it was only a joke.

  3. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by soupforare · · Score: 2, Informative

    A tachometer measure revolutions per minute(rpms) you're thinking of the odometer (which is part of the spedometer 90+% of the time), which measures miliage.

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  4. Oh, the humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is pretty cool product, but I have these visions of computer geeks, who as a group can barely manage to use a fork without injuring themselves, trying to cut holes in PC cases with power tools and horribly maming themselves.

    What they really need is a miniature version that fits into a 5.25" drive bay, without the need for major case surgery.

    1. Re:Oh, the humanity! by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      Not all geeks are.. well.. geeks. Here in crappy ole Iowa, we recently had our first really big lan party. I saw ALOT of case mods. When I talked to the kids that had done the mods, most of them didn't know what linux was, and couldn't do much with their box other than word proccessing, play quake, and IRC/IM. *shrugs* The world changed somewhere along the line.

    2. Re:Oh, the humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but kids who don't know what Linux is and are as limited in their PC usage as you describe are definitely not geeks. Hell, I bet none of them even smelled like week-old pizza.

    3. Re:Oh, the humanity! by DirtyTroll · · Score: 0

      I shit on your haircut.

      An Iowa lan party isn't much of a step up from wrestling greased pigs, is it, farmboy?

      You are +1 insightful. Thanks for posting.

    4. Re:Oh, the humanity! by Alsee · · Score: 2

      geeks. Here in crappy ole Iowa

      Yeah. In Iowa you're a geek if you know how to insert a floppy disk (or even know what a floppy disk is). But heay, at least that's better than Alabama where you're a geek if you have electricity and indoor plumbing :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:Oh, the humanity! by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
      I thought Alabama geeks bit the heads off of chickens.

      Other definitions of the word "geek"

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    6. Re:Oh, the humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh

      come on

      Old time Geeks know that you aint a "Real" geek/programmer unless you can use a soldering iron at the very least!

    7. Re:Oh, the humanity! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      geeks. Here in crappy ole Iowa

      Remember Gateway2000's earliest ads?

      COMPUTERS FROM IOWA????

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    8. Re:Oh, the humanity! by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      You ain't kidding me.

      As somebody who has his own tablesaw, power drill, anvil (I do armorwork), etc, it amuses the heck out of me every time I read the "modboy" sites.

      You can always tell them - they're the ones that include four pages at the start on how to use a Dremel. A DREMEL! It's just a dremel, you just -use- it! ;)

    9. Re:Oh, the humanity! by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

      The old adage holds true:

      The three most dangerous people on the world are a) a hardware guy with a compiler, b) a software guy with power tools, and c) a user with a feature idea.

    10. Re:Oh, the humanity! by blalor · · Score: 1

      When I talked to the kids that had done the mods, most of them didn't know what linux was, and couldn't do much with their box...

      Egads! I didn't realize there was a geek equivalent to a squid on a motorcycle...

      --
      -bjl
  5. Bump the idle up? by Thakandar2 · · Score: 1

    If this means what I think it does, I'm going to have to bump up the idle of my Windows machine just like I did in my Honda. It just kept dieing when nothing was happening...

    Or would it be the other way around, and I'd redline every time the BSOD pops up? Maybe thats when I miss a gear, I know that messes up my RPM's big time.

  6. Useless for my DUAL MP1900, When will offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Useless for my DUAL CPU AMD 1900, When will they offer support of two tach meters.

    I guess if you have one cpu this might be cool, but not if it uses a lame way of judging unutilized cpu time.

    Supporting most of the common OSs instead of the ones they offer now would be good, but if they cant, then at least offer source example for systems developers to write driver code to support it.

    Could be fun on Macs too.

    But with dual CPUs you might as well just use screen based utilities.

    1. Re:Useless for my DUAL MP1900, When will offer by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Actually, you don't need two... a single tach wih dual needles would look much cooler!

    2. Re:Useless for my DUAL MP1900, When will offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK - I've done that.

      Now what?

  7. already slashdotted :( by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1
    What I can see of the website, it looks dreadful, but that could be because of the gazillion mySQL errors he's got plastered all over the page. Very unprofessional looking. Looks like his config can't handle more than a few database connections.

    Anyone get a mirror ?

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    1. Re:already slashdotted :( by shayera · · Score: 1

      I didn't even get mySQL errors, I was just left
      sitting on that oh so informative IE error,
      telling me the site has gone byebye, is not to
      be found, I might have mistyped it etc..
      Ah well, probably the guys are sitting looking at the revs on their webserver, going 'whoaaah' :)

      --
      Venlig Hilsen / Regards
      John Hinge - shayera / .sPOOn.
      "Buffy I love you... Please God No!" S
    2. Re:already slashdotted :( by qubezz · · Score: 1

      Bet that mySQL server is hitting the redline right now!

    3. Re:already slashdotted :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't mySQL erorrs. Due to the slashdotting, his tachometer spun so fast his computer flew away.

    4. Re:already slashdotted :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, no the site is down, the hosting is down fokking hwgn.

      btw this is the owner speaking of burnoutpc.com

  8. Schweete! by Chuqmystr · · Score: 4, Funny
    But when will they come out with those little tripple-gang under-dash mounting gauge thingies that were so prevalant in POS pickup trucks and Cameros all throughout the '70s and '80s? And just what would they measure? CPU and case temp and voltage? What's next, Pep Boys and Napa Auto stores end up with a cheesy PC hop-ups isle? Oh the humanity!

    /sbin/fsck -U micro$oft

    1. Re:Schweete! by steveha · · Score: 2

      It would actually work: use a thermal probe to actually hook up the temperature guage, hook the voltage guage up to the +12V on the power supply (but it would be very boring on a good power supply, so maybe you should hook it up to a drive light or something). Not sure what to do with oil pressure. Maybe sound volume to speakers?

      I think this would be a good use for those "Tokyo-by-night" guages, with LEDs instead of moving needles. That way you wouldn't hear the sound of needles beating against the stop post when the values fluctuated...

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  9. Gah! by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 3, Funny

    So what does this have a big assed shift light, even though you're driving an automatic transmission? There are enough "riced" out cars around now. Leave the computers alone. This in no way adds performance.

    Add a turbo or nitrous oxide, overclock or supercool. Not these useless mods.

    P.S. It is RPM, not RPMs, and expecially not RPM's.

    1. Re:Gah! by jlanng · · Score: 1

      RPM's is more correct that RPMs, but yeah both are wrong. - J

    2. Re:Gah! by micromoog · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      There are enough "riced" out cars...

      Just because you drive an obsolete stock Mazda with a high-output yet delicate-as-eggshells Wankel engine, you feel you have the right to make racist comments about other cars?

    3. Re:Gah! by M-G · · Score: 2

      Thank you!

      RPM = Revolutions Per Minute

      The plural is built in, thus no need to tack a "s" on the end.

    4. Re:Gah! by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      Why would RPM's be more correct? What is the apostrophe for?

    5. Re:Gah! by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      RPM's is more correct that RPMs, but yeah both are wrong.

      If you're going to be a grammar/spelling Nazi, at least get it right. "RPM's" is a possessive form which doesn't make any sense at all in this context. "RPMs" is a plural form...still incorrect in this context, but at least it doesn't shout "ignoramus" as loudly as "RPM's."

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Gah! by pyite · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then when you say "1 RPM," you're gramatically incorrect (1 Revolutions Per Minute). I tend to let RPM = Revolution Per Minute. Referring to RPM as its own unit, I then pluralize it, leading to RPMs.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    7. Re:Gah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if it takes multiple minutes for a single revolution. Would RPMs be correct then? 1/2 RPMs = 1 revolution / 2 minutes.

      Yeah, I'm being an ass.

    8. Re:Gah! by jlanng · · Score: 1

      Well I was wrong now that I think about it. RPM's would be correct of course if it were 'Revolutions Per Minutes' but it aint so there we go

  10. Holly s**t by fabiolrs · · Score: 0

    Next step on PC mods are Nitros for extra power (aka overclock)!!! ;))

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
    1. Re:Holly s**t by Squalish · · Score: 1

      They already exist.

      We have refrigeration systems(Kryotech)

      Peltiers(1 side lowers 50 degrees, the other heats up 80)

      Water cooling(Tons of water-cooling kits out there)

      Exotic metals[http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/01q2/01052 1/cooler-25.html]

      Tons of innovations have been made in the last couple years in CPU cooling, as we try to find a way to pump up to 70 watts of heat out of the case as fast as possible

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    2. Re:Holly s**t by fabiolrs · · Score: 0

      take a look at these picture: http://www.coolcasegallery.net/ccg/images/00167/1 http://www.coolcasegallery.net/ccg/images/00167/2 I guess the guy adapted a air conditioning system to his computer! :)) The tachometer would look great on this mod!

      --
      Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
      http://www.morroida.com.br
  11. Idea I researched last year... by Niles_Stonne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought that this would be a rather interesting project to do, but never really got around to making one.

    On Windows something like this is quite simple, as all of the information is available in HKEY_DYNAMIC_DATA (think that's the one). A driver for it would simply need to poll the value(s) of interest and output them to the serial port.

    On the hardware side of things a simple D/A converter could be used to convert the data to a position for the gauge. Perhaps add some memory or a random function to it so that it would maintain a level or have a nice little "bounce" to it.

    Note that ANY dynamic information could be displayed on it, not just processor usage. I thought about getting one of those old rotary switches and mounting it next to the guage, allowing me to select different things to watch on it. After all, processor useage on my system is rather unexciting - it's been pegged at 100% for over the last year. You could track disk useage, netword throughput(really useful), or any number of other values. For a listing of them look in the "Performance Monitor"(?) application on windows 9x/Me.

    --
    Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but copyright will always protect me.
    1. Re:Idea I researched last year... by iusty · · Score: 1

      On Linux something like this is quite simple, as all the information is available in /proc/stat (with per-cpu information for SMP boxes). A driver for it would simply need to poll the value(s) of interest and output them to the serial port. :)

    2. Re:Idea I researched last year... by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      It's HKEY_DYN_DATA. I was unable to open it using regedit, and it doesn't even show up in regedt32.

    3. Re:Idea I researched last year... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      no d/a needed all tachometers that are electronic look for pulses... 1 pulse = 1 rpm.

      just increase the rate of your pulses out the port (parallel port would be a better use, or a pic on the serial port generating the pulses based on a binary number so you dont need to use 30% of the processor to display useless information.)

      this is very easy to anyone that would want to do it under linux and can program a 16f84 Pic.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Idea I researched last year... by kawika · · Score: 2

      CPU utilization is only in HKEY_DYN_DATA for Windows 9x/Me. When you get to WinNT/2K/XP the interfaces are totally different and accessed through a complex HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA pseudo registry key.

    5. Re:Idea I researched last year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't use much CPU : 8000 RPM is only 133 revs per second, and you can put 16 characters (= 16 pulses) in the FIFO so it only needs to service one interrupt every 1/8 second. Just change the baud rate to select an appropriate pulse rate.
      This assumes a pulse is generated on each new character : if the pulse width matters, a bit more work is needed to generate long gaps between pulses.

    6. Re:Idea I researched last year... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      true but I would rather service an interrupt every 1/2 second or even 1 a second. depending on the desired update rate. hell that gives you the ability to make averaging a possibility while leaving more cpu and system time to run Q3 at 3064X2098X32bit (Plain silly I know... A real gamer plays at 800x600 open GL and enjoy's insane refresh rates.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. Re:It's not RPMs by scorcherer · · Score: 5, Funny
    $ rpm -qa|wc -l
    573

    Dunno about the rev/min, but my PC has 573 RPMs.

    --

    --
    The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  13. Other external monitoring tools? by Mattygfunk · · Score: 2
    This could start a whole new line of pc monitoring tools.

    How about a cpu temperature gauge for overclockers.
    or
    A cpu odometer to give a running tally of exactly how many clock cycles it has done over its lifetime.

    Coming soon to a ThinkGeek ad near you.

    1. Re:Other external monitoring tools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am thinking more a steam pressure or a BTU guage for the old Althon.

      BTU = British Thermal Unit

    2. Re:Other external monitoring tools? by tps12 · · Score: 1
      How about a cpu temperature gauge for overclockers.

      Or just Athlon owners who live someplace warm.

      A cpu odometer to give a running tally of exactly how many clock cycles it has done over its lifetime.

      That would be cool. I'd estimate normal workplace use at 1GHz * 9 hours * 1% average usage * 260 days =~ 850 Gcycles/yr. So you'd probably want to measure it in Mcycles, so you can see the numbers move.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    3. Re:Other external monitoring tools? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1
      Windas users can get a mouse odometer that measures how far your mouse has travelled in whatever units you chose, as well as measuring things like how far your mose has climed various famous tall landmarks. Fun for a while.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    4. Re:Other external monitoring tools? by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 2

      When I was using BeOS on a regular basis, I would just turn oneof the CPUs off when it got too warm. God I miss that OS.

      --
      - Dan I.
    5. Re:Other external monitoring tools? by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

      So, of course, can X11 users thanks to xodo (link to archive on ibiblio, couldn't find an official home page. There are RPM and DEB varities, too, plus a special version for KDE. So, if you're into this sort of thing, there's no need to switch to The Other OS just to get your dose. ;^)

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    6. Re:Other external monitoring tools? by asv108 · · Score: 2

      One of my older systems had a pretty cool temp and fan monitor availible here and probably many other places

    7. Re:Other external monitoring tools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The things I miss about BeOS were how it didn't support floppy drives and barely supported printing.

      Who needs that stuff? Computers are meant to be glorified light bulbs.

  14. "Linux" driver, not "GNU/Linux" driver by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 4, Funny

    since drivers deal with the kernel and not userspace apps, RMS can keep his grubby little mitts of this one. i'd call it a "Linux" driver.

    1. Re:"Linux" driver, not "GNU/Linux" driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's serial port, the driver is done in userland. Duh.

    2. Re:"Linux" driver, not "GNU/Linux" driver by Snootch · · Score: 2

      If it's serial port, the driver is done in userland. Duh.

      Not necessarily. Just to name the first example I can think of, the parallel-port printer driver (lp) is in kernel-space. It just uses the low-level parport hooks. I would guess that this would be kernel-level too, as that would also be more expandable (other things, like CPU temp, etc, that it's easier to get from inside the kernel, unless you want to mess with /proc, but by that time it's a userland daemon, not a driver).

    3. Re:"Linux" driver, not "GNU/Linux" driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were kernel-space, then you'd have to somehow inform the kernel what serial port to output the info on. It's to my mind obviously something better suited to be a daemon, and make use of already-provided drivers.

    4. Re:"Linux" driver, not "GNU/Linux" driver by Snootch · · Score: 2

      Touché! OK, conceded!

  15. Fluctuation by 1984 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Erm, wouldn't this thing be sat there twitching the whole time?

    CPU usage fluctuates from near zero to 100% depending on what your box is up to, and a subsecond basis. Surely this'd only be good for a machine with a fairly constant load?

    1. Re:Fluctuation by justinstreufert · · Score: 1

      How about averaging it over several seconds? That's what uptime(1) does.

      If you did, like, 5 or 10 seconds, you'd have a good idea of what was going on without the needle constantly slamming into the limits. (If you think about it, on the lowest level, CPU usage is either 100% or 0% all the time...)

      Justin

      --
      "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
    2. Re:Fluctuation by Pope · · Score: 1

      I kinda thought that was the whole point: you monitor the load in near real-time, you know, like most CPU monitors. It's not like a speedometer, though it'd be funny to see an odometer attached to the hard drives to see how much life is left on the cylinders! :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Fluctuation by Ramadog · · Score: 1

      I made a cpu load indicator for my server using 10 leds driven by a spare printer port. The code I wrote samples every second then sets the appropriate number of leds. It is setup so the leds stay on for that period. This gets rid of any transients in the cpu load while giving a usefull indication of the load.

    4. Re:Fluctuation by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Uh oh, the wear indicators on the tracks are showing, time to rotate the disks :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    5. Re:Fluctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, you ought to write that up and submit it as a slashdot story or something, it sounds like a cool project. :-)

    6. Re:Fluctuation by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you writen up the spec. on this or made a website that outlines how you did this. I would like to known as I wouldn't mind doing something like this.

      Robert

  16. YMMV by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase
    "Your Mileage May Vary" now doesn't it? ;)

  17. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless I'm totally off (which is usual), an odometer is really a tachometer, for it measures (sp?) a car's wheel rpms, perhaps with an added last stage to sum revolutions up until they make a mile and them zeroing them again.

    BTW, why do you US folks still use miles, feet, inches, noses 8-) etc.? Is there another country in the world that uses such a messy system? Last time I checked, even the English were ahead of you in this field (they're using the metric system).

    I thought I've heard about the metric system (aka international system) being chosen for use in USA a long time ago. Am I confused?

  18. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Last time I checked, even the English were ahead of you in this field (they're using the metric system)"

    Not when it comes to miles per hour. Also, we drink pints of beer. This possibly isnt relevant in the states, where you apparantly get funny looks if you drink more than 2 pints in a day, for some reason.

    Drug sales are a curious mixture of both. Think thats something to do with harmonisation with Europe!

  19. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me and some mates made some for fun several years ago. We used tachmeters we found in junkyards, you're better off making one yourself rather than buying it, don't be a wimp.

  20. One small flaw... by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have, of course, just attempted to scam one of these to review on my site (most recent pointless case-mod widget review on Dan's Data: this one), but I can't help but think that there's a basic flaw in the idea.

    Namely - aren't most modders and overclockers running the distributed.net client, or some similar background task, which keeps our CPU utilisation at 100% all the time?

    I could draw a tachometer on the front of this PC, and it'd be 100% accurate :-).

    1. Re:One small flaw... by bkhl · · Score: 1

      It would be simple to modify the driver to not count that particular process. (Provided source is provided.)

    2. Re:One small flaw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Namely - aren't most modders and overclockers running the distributed.net [distributed.net] client, or some similar background task, which keeps our CPU utilisation at 100% all the time?

      Not really. Just the guys running around with pelters or a combination of pelter and watercooling. They pretty much have to keep their CPU hot or else water will start condencing on the CPU.

      Anyone just using water cooling or even (of all the low-tech ideas ;) straight fans don't need to keep the furnace going.

    3. Re:One small flaw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aren't most modders and overclockers running the distributed.net [distributed.net] client, or some similar background task,

      I kind of doubt it. Most modders and overclockers spend their time being 'hardware wizards' with their phillips screwdriver, i.e. monkeying around in there. The machine barely has time to boot up before yet another 'tweak' becomes necessary.

  21. It only goes to 8! by Performer+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want one that goes to eleven.

    http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Academy/9177/

    1. Re:It only goes to 8! by Mignon · · Score: 2
      I actually saw Spinal Tap's concert at "Carnegie Fucking Hall," in David St. Hubbin's immortal words. Nigel's guitar had several cool mods, including perhaps over a dozen pickups, exhaust pipes, a speedometer, and a tachometer. That's as much as I could make out with my friend's binoculars, so I don't know if either of the last three did anything...

      Oh, and the show was pretty cool, too. I knew I was in for a good time when I saw the midgets hanging around the back stage door. During the show, they were dressed as delivery guys and brought in the Stonehenge triptych hanging from a wheeled clothing rack, and had David St. Hubbins sign for it mid-song.

  22. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by oyenstikker · · Score: 1

    How bout an 'odometer'? You can tell exacly how much use a used computer has seen.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  23. burnoutpc's tachometer by MrSpiff · · Score: 2, Funny

    burnoutpc's tachometer must be going warm now, they've been slashdotted :/

  24. HP and toptools by gruntvald · · Score: 1

    to my amazement, when I first started checking toptools, I was able to connect to an HP server and not only see it's load remotely, I could check the CPU temperature.

  25. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by by+FortKnox+on · · Score: 0, Informative

    Please read Dictionary.com to get this definition.

    tachometer n.
    An instrument used to measure the rotations per minute of a rotating shaft. This is the automotive definition

    or

    tachometer

    \Ta*chom"e*ter\, n. [Gr. ? swiftness, speed (fr. tachy`s quick) + -meter: cf. F. tachom[`e]tre.] An instrument for measuring the velocity, or indicating changes in the velocity, of a moving body or substance. Specifically: (a) An instrument for measuring the velocity of running water in a river or canal, consisting of a wheel with inclined vanes, which is turned by the current. The rotations of the wheel are recorded by clockwork. (b) An instrument for showing at any moment the speed of a revolving shaft, consisting of a delicate revolving conical pendulum which is driven by the shaft, and the action of which by change of speed moves a pointer which indicates the speed on a graduated dial. (c) (Physiol.) An instrument for measuring the velocity of the blood; a h[ae]matachometer.

  26. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by CableModemSniper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah drug sale mixtures for weed drive me up the wall. You usually buy in grams for your daily needs but the next step up is an eighth. An eighth is 1/8 of an ounce or approx 3.2 grams. The next step up after thaty is an ounce. But then you often go back to kilos. Its nuts.There needs to be an ISO standard for drug measurements.

    --
    Why not fork?
  27. How to build your own? by Hanno · · Score: 2

    I have to admit - I have *no* knowledge
    whatsoever about car electronics; I don't even
    have a car.

    But I like this idea. Is it possible to build such
    a unit oneself using a standard analog RPM display?

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
  28. some follow-up mods by mlas · · Score: 4, Funny
    • a dipstick that measures free RAM by the depth of brown viscous goo
    • a peep plug-in that makes revving noises as cpu cycles increase, and the sound of burning rubber when an app is launched
    • and heck, why not a temperature gauge with a probe attached to the CPU for all you overclockers out there?


    If this keeps up, it won't be long before you start seeing aftermarket replacement chips to improve your computer's performance... oh, wait...
    --
    "Luck is the residue of design" --Branch Rickey
    1. Re:some follow-up mods by glennk2001 · · Score: 1

      and how about a manual transmission shifter box to switch from regular/turbo?

    2. Re:some follow-up mods by selfish · · Score: 1

      Hey, did those older computers with "Turbo" switches actually DO anything? And if so, why wouldn't you want your computer to be running as fast as possible anyway?

      The Turbo button always kinda frustrated me, but it made a light go on and off, so the entertainment from that negated the frustration. :-)

      --
      This is not an official Fugazi sig.
    3. Re:some follow-up mods by cybergibbons · · Score: 1

      Turbo was the normal state (the rated processor speed), and the other setting was slower. This was to allow programs from older computers that used clock cycles as a timing mechanism to work on newer PCs.

      Try playing any 286 game on a Athlon or P3 and you will see the problem.

    4. Re:some follow-up mods by Maran · · Score: 1

      "and heck, why not a temperature gauge with a probe attached to the CPU for all you overclockers out there?"

      You think you're kidding - a mate of mine has an LCD on the front of his box that does just this. This is the guy with water cooling, etc. I'm trying to pursuade him to put goldfish in the pipes, but he says the coolant would kill them. Not to mention the pump problem...

      Maran

    5. Re:some follow-up mods by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd love to be able to play Wing Commander again - there's a golden opportunity for someone to write a simple DOS app that allows you to adjust the timing of a program that it runs so that things happen at the right speed. Because I don't see the original publisher re-releasing the game using better timing code, unfortunately.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    6. Re:some follow-up mods by cybergibbons · · Score: 1

      I found using wine made a good job of slowing things down enough :)

    7. Re:some follow-up mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is a '286 game?

      Back in the time era you are talking about, the '286 machines were the ones that ran the 8088 games too fast.

      Clearly you've either forgotten quite a lot or you read about this stuff in your dad's diary.

      My first motheboard wasn't turbo. It was a plain 4.77 MHz one. I remember how cool it was when I got one that had an 8 MHz setting. Hell, I remember how exciting it was when I got Hercules (compatible) Graphics. Started out with an IBM MDA card like any true IBM-PC hacker.

    8. Re:some follow-up mods by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and how long unti all the ricers start putting huge 10" tachs with 3" shift-lights on their overclocked Celeron 300s?

      "Oh no, redline! Better turn the fan up to high!"

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    9. Re:some follow-up mods by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      What problem...you can finish them in record time.

    10. Re:some follow-up mods by anacron · · Score: 2

      I've always wondered -- if there was a 'Hurry The Fuck Up' button on your computer that you could press to increase the speed, how long would it take before the damn thing was permanantly duct-taped down?

      .anacron

    11. Re:some follow-up mods by sansoo · · Score: 1

      email me at kermit at urx dot com

      I'm at work now, but I have something that may do it at home.

      --
      We are the first generation of Morlocks. Eat the rich!
    12. Re:some follow-up mods by cybergibbons · · Score: 1

      What the hell is a '286 game?

      A game that was released during the era when 286 computers were the norm, obviously. Everyone else worked that out, didn't they?

      Back in the time era you are talking about, the '286 machines were the ones that ran the 8088 games too fast.

      Clearly you've either forgotten quite a lot or you read about this stuff in your dad's diary.

      My first 486 had a turbo button, as did my second one. My mates 386 had one as well. I remember trying to play many games from several years before than went too fast on "Turbo", and needed dropping down to a lower clockrate. Neither of the 486s dropped low enough really, it was still too fast.

      And yes, ever since 286s came out, they have run 8088 games too fast. They always will. That wasn't the era I was talking of.

      My first motheboard wasn't turbo. It was a plain 4.77 MHz one. I remember how cool it was when I got one that had an 8 MHz setting. Hell, I remember how exciting it was when I got Hercules (compatible) Graphics. Started out with an IBM MDA card like any true IBM-PC hacker.

      What's a "motheboard"^H^H^H^H oh, shit, forgot I wasn't a pedantic wanker troll without a user account.

  29. Re:One small flaw... - nope: just drop nice part by reneky · · Score: 1

    At least for the linux version, you'd just drop the nice part of the cpu usage. With dnetc running at nice priority it would still be relevant.

  30. Shifting by Chayce · · Score: 1

    Great so I now know when I can shift games without redlining my CPU

    --
    I like replies better than Karma, even if they are flames, because that tells me I got someone thinking.
  31. I have this vision by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    Of getting one of those add on guage clusters sitting on top of my monitor with a cpu tach, a hours guage (hours of CPU usage), and a temp guage.

    I can finally get back at all those old folks I work with who scoff at me when I say that tweeking your computer is the same thing they did 30 years ago when they messed with their cars.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  32. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Rand+Race · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the States you get funny looks if you drink pints at all, especialy 20 oz imperial pints rather than 16 oz US pints (and your ounces are 4% smaller than ours). And plenty of people down a six-pack a day, which is more than three imperial pints. Hell, you can buy single bottles of beer over here that are more than two imperial pints in capacity (warning to visiting brits, you will NOT like a 40 of Olde English 800).

    Drug sales are mixed on this side of the pond too. Pot is always measured in standard, coke is always measured in metric.

    My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's how I like it!

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  33. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "or approx 3.2 grams"

    or 3.5 grams. then theres 28 grams in an ounce, or is there 30? depends. its 100 in holland, apparantly! how many ounces in a 9 ounce bar? 9? wrong - more like 8.5. I`m sure most deaths from drug dealing arent from people being deliberately ripped off. its just all the converting to/from standards!!

  34. What would be nice... by tom_newton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..is a USB version - advantages being: No serial-port theft (I use all of mine, ta!) and if you have internal USB headers there'd be no shonky cabling out back. Bonanza.

    I wonder if there's a USB device class for this sort of thing?

    ls /dev/usb/wasteoftime/ ;)

    --
    Tom Newton
    1. Re:What would be nice... by Bearpaw · · Score: 2
      [USB]

      Yah, and with 2 needles and OS X support for dual-processor PowerMacs. Vroom.

    2. Re:What would be nice... by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

      There are serial ports you can attach to USB if you like. That's how I plan to use this thingy...

      (and with some sort of external power supply)

    3. Re:What would be nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right. The new version 10 of MacOS finally supports dual processors. It's been a long hard ride, but finally this year MacOS entered the 90's.

  35. Might be a bad idea by mikeage · · Score: 2

    I dunno... I like to keep my CPU relatively stations... seems even 1 RPM could lead to some rather twisted pins, unless the case was spinning too... and wouldn't any high velocity rotation be bad for the drives? Plus, who would want a spinning computer? ;)

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    1. Re:Might be a bad idea by technopinion · · Score: 1

      A spinning computer would be pretty cool, especially if it was in a circular transparent case, and the motherboard spun around inside it. And with the motherboard spinning, you might not even need a CPU fan. Cable connections might be an issue though... so most connectors would have to be wireless.

  36. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by gazbo · · Score: 1

    Hmm...been a while as I don't do weed anymore, but it always used to be stranger still:

    Smallest common measurement is a 'teenth, then an eighth, quarter, half, ounce. Then it goes odd with a 9bar, followed by a KG.

    But...when buying skunk, it's usually grams.

  37. What will they think of next? by cecil36 · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Now that we have the CPU tachometer, I wonder if we are any closer to making computer cases look like car dashboards. I'm wondering if it would be possible to:
    • wire a mouse to an odometer to measure miles traveled
    • put a temperature gauge on the case to measure the heat inside
    • use a fuel gauge to measure free disk space

    Next thing you know, Kelley Blue Book will be adding computers to their price lists.
  38. Deja vu all over again by Observer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    (Warning: contains nostalgia ;)

    Old-timers among us still remember the days when mainframe consoles had lamps indicating the mode the processor was operating in. The old Univac machines used to have a green indicator for "guard mode" (unprivileged user mode) which was typically quite dimly lit but would flash into prominence when a compute-intensive task was active - or when a program was wedged in a tight loop. After you'd worked with one of these machines for a while, you got used to the behaviour of the lamps and of the rows of Blinkenlights on the maintainance panels and took notice if the patterns looked abnormal: quite often this was your first warning that something was going wrong that would need investigation later.

    To return somewhat to the topic, I remember working in the late 1970's on an prototype of the first of these mainframe systems that lacked the customary indicator lamps. I was puzzled for a while by a cheap analog 'Vu' meter balanced on top of one of the cabinets, with a few components soldered to its connectors and a couple of wires trailing back inside: one was clipped to the frame, the other to one of the many wire-wrap pins on the processor back-panel. The meter didn't seem to do anything, but all became clear when I was running a compilation a day or so later: the meter reading went up to 80 percent or so for seconds at a time. Yes, an ingenious engineer had worked out how to fit a guard-mode indicator to the new range machines; sadly, it never made it to the production models and a little piece of computing history came to an end.

    Of course, today I run the Windows task manager so I can tell when the braindead browser on this company-issue PC is wedged and must be killed and restarted. So much for progress.

    1. Re:Deja vu all over again by baptiste · · Score: 2
      After you'd worked with one of these machines for a while, you got used to the behaviour of the lamps and of the rows of Blinkenlights

      The lamps may be LEDs now, but not much has changed. I've got all my servers in one place next to each other with teh networking gear nearby. All blikenlights in clear view. I run web services, email, etc for a number of folks so I have pretty regular traffic. Its amazing how you quickly associate blink patterns and sounds. I can tell when my raid array (Deathstars) hits a bad sector (which is too often), the network lights tell a lot - I can tell by my switch which server is getting hit the most, etc If I hear an unusual sound from disks or notice odd blink pattersn - I often investigate looking for intruders ;)

      Now if all my web servers had teh triple gauge combos on top showing CPU load, Network load, and Temp - that would be WAY too cool.

      So many ways to waste what little time I have to do stuff like this!

    2. Re:Deja vu all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell when the braindead browser on this company-issue PC is wedged and must be killed and restarted.

      That's gotta be Netscape. Right?

    3. Re:Deja vu all over again by steveha · · Score: 2

      Back in my Apple ][ days, there was a gadget that I lusted after. It was an array of LEDs, 16x16 (256 in all), and it was connected to the 8-bit memory bus on the Apple ][. Since you only had 64KB of memory space, each of the 256 LEDs mapped onto a 256-byte chunk of address space. The lights would light up for each access to that chunk.

      It would have been very interesting to watch the lights during, say, garbage collection in BASIC.

      It would still be fun to have something like that on a grander scale, perhaps docked near my CPU meter in my GNOME desktop.

      While I never got the LEDs gadget, I did take an AM radio and set it up on top of my computer, volume turned down low. The RF interference made a distinct sound, which changed pitch when something different happened. If the computer went into an infinite loop, you could hear it. I got tired of the noise, though, so I don't do this anymore.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  39. Just like my car! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    Now my Window$ machine can flash a "Service Engine Soon" light at me. I'll have to put some black tape over it to fix it...

  40. Metric vs. imperial by kiwimate · · Score: 1, Redundant

    FWIW

    There are currently three countries that have not officially switched over to the metric system (depending on your definition of "switched over" -- try driving in England if you don't want to use MPH). They are USA, Liberia, and Myanmar (also known as Burma). This makes the US the only industrialized country to not have officially adopted the metric system.

    However, anecdotally (because I didn't grow up in the US, so can't confirm this from personal experience), I understand that you will often find the metric system being used in education, science, etc. For example, I know someone who was a chemistry major at Penn about 40 years ago who had to use the metric system for everything during her studies.

    1. Re:Metric vs. imperial by hawk · · Score: 2

      >There are currently three countries that have not
      >officially switched over to the metric system
      >depending on your definition of "switched over"
      >-- try driving in England if you don't want to
      >use MPH). They are USA,


      Depends upon your definition of "officially." We've "officially" switched many times, it's just that we're not going to let some central government push us around on the issue.


      The first round wad during the Jefferson administration, when he issued an executive order to put us on that silly semi-10 based system. We didn't due it then, and it doesn't look so hot to us now, either . . .


      Just look at how much trouble it's caused--playing with those silly french units has already cost us at least one mars probe . . .


      hawk

    2. Re:Metric vs. imperial by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Although we are using decimal currency, which was also Jefferson's idea - apparently decimal money is more of an advantage than other decimal measurements.

      I can confirm that all science in the U.S. is done in the metric system - kilograms, liters, etc. Having experienced both, I prefer the metric system, but I don't see that the American populace as a whole will be ready to switch any time soon.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    3. Re:Metric vs. imperial by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

      Liberia changed over to Metric sometime last year.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
      - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:Metric vs. imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Thanks for playing.

      The United States has officially adopted the metric standard. Unfortunately, only the government really seems to care. The populace still uses the old English system, and people tend to look at you like you're a freak if you use metric units.

      The United States military does its measurements in metric terms, at least for official purposes, and an inch is legally defined as 2.54 cm, and not three grains of barley (the way it once was).

    5. Re:Metric vs. imperial by screwtheNSA · · Score: 0

      At least the majority of the world has the damn steering wheel on the CORRECT SIDE of the car, which is the LEFT side!

      --
      206.39.38.2, DDN-BLK-36, DOD NET INFO CENTER. 800.365.3642 206.36.0.0-206.39.255.255 NET RANGE.
  41. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by DirtyTroll · · Score: 0

    I shit on your haircut.

    You are wrong. People who buy and sell weed typically use these units: eighths, quarters, half ounces, ounces, quarter pounds, then pounds.

    However, you mentioned drugs, and this is good. You are +1 insightful. Thanks for posting.

  42. NO, it doesn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a tachometer, not an odometer.

  43. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it to a /geek to miss the humor or technical inaccuracies.

  44. OT: .mil is metric.. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

    I understand that you will often find the metric system being used in education, science, etc.

    The US Armed Forces uses the metric system, as well. So even grunts in the field deal with meters and liters and such. I guess it helps greatly, since they spend a lot of time deployed in places that also use the metric system... :^/

  45. That's nice, but... by dracvl · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the really cute thing about the case mod was the Pac-man eating the reset button and LEDs.

    Check out the picture :)

    1. Re:That's nice, but... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      ...the really cute thing about the case mod was the Pac-man eating the reset button and LEDs.

      PC Club was selling those the last time I built a couple of machines...they might still have 'em. Wocka wocka wocka wocka...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  46. Ack! RPM not RPM's or RPMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RPM = revolutions per minute

    Doesn't revolutions per minutes sound pretty stupid? How about revolutions per minute's.

  47. turbo switches by hawk · · Score: 2
    The first couple of turbo switches even made sense--they could drop you back down to the 4.77 clock of the original pc. After that, though,thy tended to just drop you back about 25% from full clock.


    Early games relied on loops and instruction execution for timing--they knew how long something would take, and how much time had elapsed b y where they were in the code. Double the clock, and things ran (roughly) twice as fast, making interactive games hard or impossible.


    I'm not sure this made it into the 286 perio, but if someone figured that that was as fast as desktop/home machines were going to get . . . (i.e., believed the line that the 386 was only for servers, ever . . .)


    hawk

  48. How tachometers work... by Muerte23 · · Score: 1
    I believe tachometers work by getting a 12v pulse from the distributor every time cylinder 1 fires. So all you need to do is up the voltage from the serial port a little and send bits at a frequency proportional to the CPU usage.

    I have a spare tachometer in my closet actually, so maybe I will give it a try myself...

    Muerte

    1. Re:How tachometers work... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I believe tachometers work by getting a 12v pulse from the distributor every time cylinder 1 fires. So all you need to do is up the voltage from the serial port a little and send bits at a frequency proportional to the CPU usage.

      If it's RS-232, a serial port should be spitting out a 12V (±12V, actually) signal already. IIRC, a serial signal can go up to ±30V.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:How tachometers work... by unitron · · Score: 2
      It's been a long while since I looked into (or cared about) hooking up a tach, but I'm pretty sure it gets a parallel feed of the pulse stream from the points (or electronic equivalent) to the coil primary. In other words, it gets a pulse every time that any plug fires (or misfires, for that matter).

      I can't remember if the crankshaft makes one turn or two for every rotation of the distributor but either way the faster the engine is turning the more pulses per unit of time. These pulses are fed to a capacitor which smoothes them out into a "steady" DC which rises and falls as engine speed does.

      The tach is basically a DC voltmeter that reads that voltage level on the capacitor. Some tachs have a switch or jumper to change capacitors or change the resistance in a resistor-capacitor combination so that you can set them for either an 8 cylinder or 6 cylinder engine (for 4 cylinders set it for 8 and divide the reading in half).

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  49. Fun times... by Munky · · Score: 1

    Why not make it go to 10,000 RPM? Then you can tell all of your friends.. "I took it up to 10,000 RPM, dropped the clutch (opened an app) and did a massive burn out!" (BSOD)

    1. Re:Fun times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'dropped the clutch' would be the equivalent of killing all the extraneous processes, definitely NOT 'opened an app'.

  50. burnout or burnouts? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Guess burnoutpc is having multiple burnouts by the effect of slashdot ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  51. NASA on the otherhand ... by TheViffer · · Score: 1, Redundant

    has tried to be the first organization to "integrate" both standard and metric.

    Mars Climat Orbitor Lost

    Kind of costly to show that it does not work well.

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  52. Tried that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had a pong game going @ mach 3...

    Had a Donkey Kong (original VGA) tthat finished it's demo under 1'

    Now I got a dual 1Gig PIII/512 Mo Ram...

    Maybe I should try A BEOWULF CLUSTER OF PONG GAMES...

  53. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >This possibly isnt relevant in the states, where you apparantly get funny looks if you drink more than 2 pints in a day, for some reason.

    Simple -- American beer has (on average) 20-40% more alcohol than British beer.

    Next time you're bored, compare the amount of alcohol in Tetley's to Budweiser (the only American brand I could easily find in the UK).

    You'll be shocked to see that, once again, you're getting royally screwed.

  54. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    Unless I'm totally off (which is usual), an odometer is really a tachometer, for it measures (sp?) a car's wheel rpms, perhaps with an added last stage to sum revolutions up until they make a mile and them zeroing them again.

    Yes, you're totally off. A tachometer measures rotations per unit time. An odometer measures accumulated rotations. A tachometer is much more complex than an odometer (an odometer is just some gears and wheels).

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  55. I've been Slashdotted, the server's at redline! by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    Tweak the driver to show rate of web site hits instead. Quick look tells you how high the traffic is.

  56. If you're going for the "car look"... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    ...you might as well add a key and ignition switch to power it up. Radio shack sells SPST switches that involve putting a key into a switch and turning it. However, I don't know if they are momentary switches or not. Momentary switches are basically "soft buttons" that you just touch.

    If you have an AT power supply, you wouldn't want a momentary switch. If you have an ATX power supply, you want a momentary switch, otherwise your computer will shut down 4 seconds or so after you turn the key.

    1. Re:If you're going for the "car look"... by maX_ · · Score: 1

      The first As/400 I worked on had a keyswitch for the front control panel. you needed it to manually IPL the machine, or change IPL mode from the control panel. Looks like they're comming full circle again.

  57. makes me wish I had kept my Autometer Tach by mtnbkr · · Score: 1

    It was one of those 5" Monster tachs like you see in race cars.

    Chris

  58. Sorry, It just bugs me. by J4 · · Score: 2

    "Are so fun to watch"
    ARRRRRGGGH, thats so *much* fun to watch.
    Or perhaps you meant "their more funner too whatch".
    Anyway, It is a cool hack, but kind of ass backwards. When the rpms are up you should get
    better response. Not likely when the load is up.

    1. Re:Sorry, It just bugs me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so pedantic. Informally, fun is acceptable as an adjective.

  59. DIY - use your own tach SAVE $34.00 USD by emptybody · · Score: 1

    The software can be bought seperately for $14.95 !!! from ther site::

    "The Xoxide Tachometer Modificaiton is now availible to anyone with a tachometer lying around. Just supply your own tach, serial cord and power, and using our software you'll be able to have the same quality modification provided by our own tachometer mod.
    Note that this software will not work on all tachometers, we've had success with most electronic tachometers with a setting for 4 cylinder cars.

    Please feel free to contact us for more info. No refunds will be offered in the event that your tachometer is not compatible so please check or ask us.
    Product Contents:
    Installation CD
    Schematics
    Free Phone/E-Mail Support
    Availability: Usually ships the next business day.
    $14.99

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  60. GNU/Linux driver in the works? by sharkey · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If this thing measures your RPMs, seems like it would already work on Linux. Besides, the RedHat Package Manager already has a progress meter that will move faster the faster a package is installed. the command 'rpm -ih' will turn on hashes during install.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  61. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by swillden · · Score: 4, Funny

    My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's how I like it!

    Wow, that's what I call a real gas guzzler. I thought my SUV sucked fuel, but it gets around 270,000 rods per hogshead. Well, unless I'm pulling my trailer, then it drops to about 141,000, but what do you expect, I mean the trailer weighs like 500 stone and has a pretty large front sail area.

    What kind of vehicle are you driving, anyway? I mean, I think an M-1 Abrams tank gets around 6000 rph.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  62. Next up "Mood" PC's by Diamon · · Score: 1

    Figure out a way to give the case of heat sensitive coating and see how warm your box is by it's color.

    But for the CPU utilization an Amber Vu Meter would look so much cooler, for retro factor, than a Tach.

  63. Suckerometer by nekosej · · Score: 1

    There's a PC-tachometer buyer born every minute. I know becuase my Birth-Rate tachometer tells me so.

    --
    Never pet a burning dog.
  64. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i drink stuff with generally between 4 and 6% alcohol. I thought bud was about 4..perhaps less?

  65. I remember the good old days... by snoitpo · · Score: 1

    My first job out of college (1982) involved babysitting an IBM 370\168. On the console was a large meter (about 4 x 6 inches) marked 0.0 to 1.0 (11 big tickmarks, 90 little ones). A bunch of toggle switches allowed you to flip in the points you wanted to monitor (CPU, channels 0 through 15--this was a 2 processor complex so there was a twin console about 10 feet away). When monitoring a CPU it would rapidly jiggle from one extreme to another.

    What I would like to see someone do is connect a 168 console to a modern system--it was about 5 feet long with hundreds of switch and dials and each one did something neat. Also, elled off on the left was two micofiche readers; the one on the left was usable to look up maintenance documents and the one on the right had a screwed-in fiche and rows of incandecent lights (about 20 rows and 32 columns; you could read the fiche between the rows of lights), and depending on where you were on the fiche you could look at the status of various registers. Between the two readers behind a panel was a small plugboard where you could configure the memory--if you had a failing chip (1024 bits) or card you could reconfigure the memory and re-IPL the machine. IIRC, the top few lights on the top row were red and were permanently marked things like "THERMAL FAULT" and other really nasty things.

  66. Re:First PAGE WIDENING post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple patch = FORMAT C, install anything-but-Windows.

    The end.

  67. I have the l33test mod of all... by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    My computer is a Type R .

    C-X C-S

  68. Warning: Bad Movie Pun Following by bluewarp · · Score: 1

    Sure, you can install this, along with your Nitrous Oxide system. When you're surfing /. at full throttle and you decided you want a little more, go ahead a bury the tach. But soon your computer will start saying "Warning: Manifold Critical." Then what else can you do but say... "I almost had you."

  69. Re:How to build your own? -Car tachs are expensive by Andre060 · · Score: 2
    In fact, a real car tach is more expensive (new anyway) than the one they are selling. So unless you grab an old one from a junkyard for cheap, not much point to building it yourself...

    Andre060

  70. Ok here's the consensus by jgerman · · Score: 2
    After sending emails around about this here are the best ideas:
    • make a spoiler and airdams out of an old case
    • paint the whole thing neon green
    • slap some vtech stickers all over it
    • replace the drive bay covers with chrome grilles
    • replace the power button with a key start
    • link an engine wav to the tach, as rpms go up the sound get's higher pitched and louder


    Think I found a weekend project next time it's raining.

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    1. Re:Ok here's the consensus by jgerman · · Score: 2

      I forgot some, get a windowed case and tint it, and put neon strips around the bottom.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  71. red zone, red zone, all the time by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would be entertaining for anyone who isn't running a distributed computing project (d.net, SETI@home, Folding@Home, etc.). If you are, the thing would be pegged at 100%, all the time, maybe with a slight twitch when you load or terminate an app.

    While you might think it would be cool to have your tach pegged in the far red all the time, my first milisecond-scale reaction would be "Broken gauge", and my second milisecond-scale reaction would be "I just lost all my oil while driving at high speed and my engine will seize up in three... two... one...".

    Either way, I'd have that little viceral moment of panic each time I looked at the thing.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  72. Eat shit, Mr. Robert Malda. but don't die, yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

    It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment

    If this error seems to be incorrect, please provide the following in your report to SourceForge.net:

    Browser type
    User ID/Nickname or AC
    What steps caused this error
    Whether or not you know your ISP to be using a proxy or some sort of service that gives you an IP that others are using simultaneously.
    How many posts to this form you successfully submitted during the day
    * Please choose 'formkeys' for the category!
    Thank you.

  73. Re:First PAGE WIDENING post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slightly more complex patch:

    mount /windows partition.

    edit a file:

    vi /windows/autoexec.bat

    insert a new line:

    c:\windows\command\fdisk /mbr

    save and exit vi.

    reboot machine. at LILO prompt select Dos/Windows option.

    This procedure removes certain boot sector viruses which infect many dual-boot machines.

  74. LCDs, VFDs, and lcdproc by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    This could start a whole new line of pc monitoring tools.

    (Ok, I just want to say, I think hooking up analog gauges is a neat idea, and I wholeheartedly approve of the "riceboy" mentality. With that out of the way...)

    None of this stuff is really new. A shitload of monitoring tools like this, have already been thought up and implemented. People why are interested in these sort of things, should look into getting something like a Matrix Orbital LCD or VFD (or one of their competitors) hooked up to a serial port, and the lcdproc server software.

    lcdproc clients have been written for all kinds of things, and idle monitors, temperature displays, etc are all old hat. Last year, I had a very embarrassing incident where my home fileserver's RAID5 was running in degraded mode for 6 months(!) before I noticed, because I never bothered to read logs (just goes to show what a shitty admin I am). So I thought, "never again" and darn near effortlessly wrote a little python program that displays my RAID status on the box's VFD. If my one of my RAID's partitions ever goes out again, then the usual "RAID Ok" that flashes on the front of my box every few seconds, will be replaced with something scary-looking, and I'll know.

    LCD/VFD displays are a lot more versatile and general-purpose than analog stuff, the sky's the limit to what you can do with these things, and lcdproc makes them so easy to program. Every box should have one! :-)

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:LCDs, VFDs, and lcdproc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that URL is supposed to be www.matrixorbital.COM.

  75. Not Analog but by fw3 · · Score: 1
    My aix box has had a frontpanel load average monitor for ages, nice to be able to just glance at the box and quickly assess how busy it is :-)

    Older RS/6000 boxes included a 3 digit LED on the front of the case, Intended for diagnostics, it would show (lots!) of codes as the system ran thru the boot sequence.

    So naturally a hacker in .fi put together a set of tools that included the ability to drop the load average to the LED.

    The coolest thing about this was the inevitable reaction if an IBM-er were ever in to do support work.

    Normally you see the LED would be blank after boot *unless* the system crashed in which case it was used to display diagnostic codes (the dreaded 'flashing 888').

    So the IBM-ers would always do a big double-take, 'cause that meant 'dead-box' to them ;-).

    --
    Linux is Linux, if One need clarify their dist: <Dist>/GNU Linux
    bsds are of course just BSD
  76. Re:How to build your own? -Car tachs are expensive by maX_ · · Score: 1

    Good Ol' JcWhitney lists them starting at $24.95
    http://www.jcwhitney.com/product.jhtml?CATID=4566& BQ=jcw2

  77. Old GE-635 had one of these per CPU by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

    The old General Electric 635 (mainframe - late '60s) had an analog MIPS meter for each CPU. It was great fun to watch... and ohh so exciting when it got up near 1 MIP (the maximum it could read).

    BTW... each processor was the size of a bunch of concatenated refrigerators. Memory, in 64MW chunks was in separate similar sized boxes.

    Hey... mod me up... us ancient fogies need all the help we can get :-)

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

  78. Something is missing... by brad3378 · · Score: 2
    If I were to do this on my Linux box,
    I'd have:

    Tach as shown above

    coolant temp gage (for monitoring processor temp)

    Fuel gage for UPS battery life

    Speedometer (for network traffic)

    Now if this was on a windows box,
    The obvious solution would be to replace all gages with idiot lights and fuzzy dice.

    ;)

    --

  79. How about a hardware-only solution? by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    It's neat they have an analog guage being controlled by a serial port, but I really don't want to run the software driver. It would be great to have a hardware-only solution.

    I remember the old IBM 4381 console keyboard had an amber Wait light on it (and a Big Red Button emergency power off button I only got to push once). The wait light stayed solid when the system was at 0% CPU, and turned off at a rate corresponding to the CPU load. It was fun trying to turn the light off by running several jobs at once.

    I'd like to see a hardware CPU tachometer, temperature guage, and activity lights for each slot and port.

    1. Re:How about a hardware-only solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that the 'software driver' is pretty trivial.

      There are 100 jiffies per second, every jiffy the kernel gets a clock interrupt and calls schedule. If the idle process isn't running, flip a bit on the serial port and you'll see a nice 6000 ticks per second signal on the serial port of a system that is pegging the CPU at 100%.

      You can see in the divx movie on the Xoxide site that their meter never exceeds 6000 RPM either.

      It's just too bad for the people with Linux/Alpha, they'll probably burn out the tachometer before realizing that their system is running at 1024 jiffies per second.

  80. RPM vs RPMs vs RPM's vs RsPM by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

    P.S. It is RPM, not RPMs, and expecially not RPM's.

    Agreed, Commander Pedant.

    And with baseball season coming up, you should be starting up your compaign to get all members of the press and game announcers to remember that Runs Batted in are RBI, not RBIs (and "expecially" [sic]) not RsBI!

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  81. Patent Pending - sorry prior art. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My picputer project contains a MPU utilization pwm output that could drive any meter or led. (http://picputer.com/docs/usage.html) I wrote and posted to my web page "An analog meter can also be hooked up for that retro feel." in january of 2002.

    Even so, I doubt I was the first to think of this.

  82. Meanwhile, back in reality. by Charlie+Bill · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    there's millions of starving children in, um, I forget where. Isn't there a better use of time and money then yet another useless case mod? Its ironic that whatever drivers you throw on top to monitor performance are going to have -some- sort of hit.

    None of this will make you a better person, clear up your acne or get you laid...

    Anyone with an extra $50 burning that large a hole in their pocket should feel free to contact me and I'll give you a few worthy charities who could more deservingly use the cash.

    1. Re:Meanwhile, back in reality. by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      Anyone with an extra $50 burning that large a hole in their pocket should feel free to contact me and I'll give you a few worthy charities who could more deservingly use the cash.

      More deservingly? You've got to be fscking kidding me. Are you saying I'm less deserving of my money because I earned it myself? Nobody decides who is more deserving of my money but me, and here's my position: *I* am the most deserving of my money. Why? I EARN IT.

      Deserving is defined as follows: To earn by service; to be worthy of (something due, either good or evil); to merit; to be entitled to; as, the laborer deserves his wages; a work of value deserves praise.

      So, tell me again how a charity is more deserving of my $50 than I am? The charity didn't earn it by service. The people whom the charity are giving it to didn't earn it. There was no work of value by anyone but me, so how can anyone but me deserve the money? The answer is, they don't. It's very nice if you're willing to give them money out of the goodness of your heart, but they don't deserve a single dime. Period.

      The USA was once full of people who worked their asses off to own nice things. Now it's full of people who don't do shit yet believe they are deserving of a luxurious American lifestyle. Their front-men are people like you, and the people who believe this "I deserve what you earned" mantra are part of what is tearing our country apart.

      In closing, take your anti-American bullshit elsewhere. We don't need it here.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  83. some other mods you forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention writing numbers in white shoe polish on their monitors... and lots of stickers on the case... :) Oh and chrome connector ends!

    "Yep, she'll do 5000 processes in 6.2..."

  84. Need to ask? by Team+Vogon · · Score: 0

    I know this case mod stuff has become very popular, but I don't get it, why mod up your case.

    Is it the 'cool' geek thing to do?

    I guess I just don't get it. My box sits under the desk collecting dust, the only time I ever look at it is to insert or remove a floppy or cd/dvd. I would never see any of the mods.

    Oh well, just curious as to why it is done?

    --
    -I'll hang up and listen...
  85. Demo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is up with that Divx demo? Did they decide it wasn't actually import to see the product in the product demo? Plus I hear aliens in the background...

    http://members.verizon.net/~vze33w5j/computer/mo vi e.avi

  86. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
    Ask Abe Simpson, I stole the line from him.

    But to answer your question, my actual car gets 383,040 rods per hogshead. You are right, your SUV sucks fuel as my RX-7 is most definately not very fuel efficient... especialy for a car that only weighs 43.5 attic talents.

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  87. Re: 1 Pulse = 1 RPM [NOT] by HankMurphy · · Score: 1

    re: no d/a needed all tachometers that are electronic look for pulses... 1 pulse = 1 rpm. A couple of minor details...1 pulse, measured from the spark plug, = 2 revs in a four-stroke engine. 1 pulse in a two-stroke = 1 rev. But there haven't been any two stroke cars in a long time (Saab was the last, I think), and two-stroke dirt motorcycles are on their way to being outlawed by the EPA... Of course, REAL tachometers are mechanical.

  88. .debs by global_diffusion · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for this app to display .debs or ebuilds.

  89. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because we live in a pseudo-democracy and the populace doesn't give a rat's ass about metric.

  90. I am an editor for Burnoutpc by KLoopy · · Score: 1

    Whoa... check out our hits OMG they crashed us... 'nuff said. Steve Editor / Hardware Review www.burnoutpc.com

  91. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by PeeOnYou2 · · Score: 1

    Wrong, pot is not always measured in standard. Only when you're dealing in large quantities. When dealing in 1/4 oz and junk you always weigh it in grams. Even oz's are weighed in grams. Same with coke.

  92. Re: 1 Pulse = 1 RPM [NOT] by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    actually that is only the case for low end tachometers. real tachs and OEM tachs get their pulse from the flywheel sensor which gives a pulse every revolution. and some others get a pulse on every cyl firing (ford) and do a mathematical conversion... these are a faster response tach as they can change within 1/4 of a revolution.

    Only the cheap aftermarket tachs like sunpro use a cyl-1 spark detector.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  93. Re:Cheating? -Tach not odometer by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    Real men measure their speed in femtoparsecs per microfortnight!

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  94. This is sooooo old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had this mod on my 486sx25 back in 1994.

    Write a five line proggy that runs on low priority and outputs "load" on your parport.
    Add 2 bucks of electronic (drivers) and rip a RPM-display from your old car.

    Done in under 15 Minutes.
    And it looked so boring, that I just left it in, when I disposed the box.

    But maybe that was because load was always above 0.9....

  95. Build your own remote-controlled analog meter by leighklotz · · Score: 2

    I built my own remote controlled analog meter using an AC voltmeter from Radio Shack, and an X10 dimmer from X10.com (no link needed -- I'm' sure you already have a window open there anyway).

    You can control it remotely from a command-line program and use it to display your web server load, ebay price, whatever. (Hey, it could be a Web Service or maybe even a Gnome widget!)

    See pictures and instructions at http://graflex.org/klotz/meter

  96. what would be really cool by mashy · · Score: 1


    If the Linux version ships with source (or even if it doesn't), it would be really neat to modify this for measuring different things.

    I would love to have one of these on my router box to represent bandwidth utilization. Maybe even have individual ones on different sides of bridges, all calibrated to show what portion of the network is using percentages of bandwidth.

    With these gauges, fit with some kind of fluorescent backlight, the server closet would look pretty leet at night.

  97. junkyard speedo? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    I have a speedometer that i grabbed from a junkyard for exactly this purpose. It's labelled up to 110 which i thought was almost like "goes to eleven".

    It's just a voltmeter. 0-3 vdc moves it thru it's complete range.

    I figured i'd write a daemon to poll the cpu usage and drive the speedo via the parallel port and a dac. Alas, i never found good plans to build such a circuit and I'm no EE.

    Anyone know how to do it?

  98. How (I think) it's done by Ian+Peon · · Score: 2
    Having dabbled with my cars and done lots of work with serial ports, I think I got this one figured.


    When your car is running, the on-board processor (or, if you've got an older model, the points) is firing off a 12 volt signal 4 times per engine revolution (for a 4 cyl). The trigger tells the coil to fire it's juice to the spark plugs. (OK, actually, it causes a field collapse, but that's not important now!) That 12 volt trigger is what a tach normally reads. 1000 RPM = 4000 12 volt triggers per second. 8000 RPM (XOxide's tach max) is 32k triggers per second - closing on as fast as older com ports can go.


    OK, now wire up that trigger connector on the tach to the CTS (or was it RTS?) on a com port. Now a small background process that reads the stat you wanna display then opens the com port the appropriate amount of times per second should do it.


    I think I've got an old tach laying around somewhere...

  99. Re:your .sig is gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /sbin/fsck -U micro$oft

    u have problems with such comments?

    sorry i do not speak english very well.

    however i do speak machine code with very real and very accurate and very efficient skill levels such that you may need to translate something a tad more specific, if you think for a second little ole M$ is worth ONE CENT MORE THAN real products.

    sig=zulu. eck korps via pluto

    the above lines of case hardened logic will fly upon any jacka55'ss today tomarrow or 777,000 years form now.

    some things are willing to pay .02 cents for computer code that is not owned by dumbasses.