Slashdot Mirror


Free Wireless Networks at Airports

WallytheWalrus writes "Today's Minneapolis Star-Tribune is carrying an article about the installation of a wireless network throughout Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, the first of five such airports across the nation to get a uniform wireless network system. The system, which cost only $250,000 to install, will be free to business travellers passing through the airport (who have the correct hardware), and available through a number of kiosks throughout the airport. One can only hope this is the first step towards bigger and bolder public wireless network projects."

295 comments

  1. Austin Airport by ChiefArcher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the Austin airport also HAD a free wireless network.. but because of the .com fallout, they started charging like $6.95 a day or something... It's sometimes worth if you're sitting there waiting for your flight..

    ChiefArcher

    1. Re:Austin Airport by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Informative
      but because of the .com fallout, they started charging like $6.95 a day or something

      No, that's because it was a "trial period" by Wayport. There was at least one other company (MobileStar) providing 802.11b, but they went FC a few months back. Both of them had a login screen that totally fucked up my browser cache (or something) such that it kept trying to access their stupid login server whenever I tried to go to my home page.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Austin Airport by Brento · · Score: 2

      There was at least one other company (MobileStar) providing 802.11b, but they went FC [f---edcompany.com] a few months back.

      They got some angel capital from Voicestream and Starbucks, and they seem to be doing alright. I'm a subscriber, and I thought their service would drop off at any day, but it's doing well.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    3. Re:Austin Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Airpath Wireless and Airtran do this too.

      They currently service a few Airtran locations (ATL, BOS, IAD, etc)

      I Love it! pr0n at the terminals... now I won't mind waiting the extra 2 hours :)

    4. Re:Austin Airport by rlowe69 · · Score: 2

      ...but they went FC [f---edcompany.com] a few months back. Both of them had a login screen that totally fucked up my browser cache...

      Heh. Why bother filtering the domain bracketing when they can just go ahead and fucking swear anyway? :)

      --
      ----- rL
    5. Re:Austin Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Austin Airport did not start charging due to the dotcom fallout, they were giving free service initially as a PR push, while they finalized all of the installation proceedures. Contractually, they were not allowed to charge until certain conditions were met, hence the free access.

    6. Re:Austin Airport by alexburke · · Score: 2

      they went FC [f---edcompany.com] a few months back. Both of them had a login screen that totally fucked up my browser cache

      If you're going to keep such vulgarities from the virginal eyes of the Slashdot crowd, at least try to be uniform about it. ;)

  2. FBI and FAA snoops by kiley · · Score: 1

    That way the feds can track kidnapperguy when he checks his email on holiday.

  3. LAN PARTY by underclocked · · Score: 5, Funny

    LAN Party in Terminal 8b!

    1. Re:LAN PARTY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just be careful about what you yell in the airport as you frag yer buddies...

      "I'm gonna shoot yer ass off and take your big frazzin' gun!" you yell airport security get deployed on your position in force! ;)

      =tkk

    2. Re:LAN PARTY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just make sure you delete the "Bomb has been planted" sample before you play the defuse maps.

    3. Re:LAN PARTY by British · · Score: 2

      Laugh all you want, I partook in a small(and I do mean small) LAN party with regular ethernet at a coffee shop. We all shared a connection via someone's Ricochet modem hooked up. Wires were everywhere. The small corner we overtook looked partially assimilated.

    4. Re:LAN PARTY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      W411h4ck3r f4g, n0 h34dsh07 d4mn l4g !

      - 054m4 b1n l4d3n

  4. I love it but... by vulgarDPS · · Score: 1

    Great idea but what are they gonna do for security. Last time I check all the security for wireless networking sucked... BAD. The only encryption methods that have been heavily implemented are old and easy to break exept the one apple JUST released for 128 bit encyption for use with airport.

    1. Re:I love it but... by sulli · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ummmm... who cares? This is a public, untrusted network. So what if someone's snooping? Use IPSec if you don't want to be snooped.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    2. Re:I love it but... by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      So run something secure between your machine and your destination - ssh, ssl, etc...

    3. Re:I love it but... by ReluctantBadger · · Score: 0

      And what good is IPSec if the system you are connecting to does not support it? Does you get IPSec when you connect to Slashdot? No.

      Yeah fine if your employer's servers are configured this way, but not for normal surfing!!

    4. Re:I love it but... by vulgarDPS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your completely missing the point. Security is something that everyone should be aware of and trying to use as much as possible. If they were to wait a year until a better encryption was properly implemented into everyday wireless networking then they could insure a much more secure access point.

      Just becuase you know its a public untrusted network doesn't joe nobody does. They feel safe beacuse it's regulated by the airport therefore they will do things on the network you probably shouldn't do in an untrusted network. Just like people who do insecure wireless netoworking in there home and then bitch when all their information and credit card numbers are compromised.

      If you are runnning an open network or anything open to multiple users (even a shell server) you should try to protect the security of your users as much as possible, you shouldn't forget about it just because you know you wont do anything stupid on it.

    5. Re:I love it but... by sulli · · Score: 1
      I agree with YOUR post.

      And ... ummmm ... I AM an egotistical ass. Thanks for noticing!

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    6. Re:I love it but... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Well.. what are you expecting?

      It's an untrusted network.

      Do you have some illusion that nbody can snoop on what you are doing when you surf slashdot normally from home?

      How is this any different?

      SEcurity must be in the hands of the end stations, not the carriers.

    7. Re:I love it but... by oherntp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, they set up a captive portal (NoCat.net) and tell every one that this is not a secure network and they shouldn't do anything stupid. Done.

      Tom

    8. Re:I love it but... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      You'd be suspicious if you saw a bunch of goons walking around the airport with walkie talkies...

      but a bunch of goons carrying wireless-linked laptops is ok?

      Sounds like one hell of a plot could be dreamed up with this kind of infrastructure in place. What are they thinking?

    9. Re:I love it but... by Big+Diluth · · Score: 1
      They would have to reveal the key for anyone to access the network, so what is the point?

      If they want to have a secure network, they have to have an administrative process in place to issue it on the spot or (probably) beforehand and quite frankly I think these prople can barely handle keeping track of my luggage.

      If you put in security, it is only going to be on the lower layers and that encapsulation will be stripped off enroute to the web site you are reaching. Unless it remains encrypted end-to-end, it is not going to work or even matter.

      You need to encourage SSL web access for there to be any real security.

      Since most people hardly bat an eye to giving their credit card info over a cell phone or in a public pay phone with A LOT of strangers standing within ear shot, this may be an easier battle since the web sites will initiate the https session for them.

      That would be the way to go.

    10. Re:I love it but... by ReluctantBadger · · Score: 0

      "Do you have some illusion that nbody can snoop on what you are doing when you surf slashdot normally from home?" I don't think I suggested anything like that!! My point was excatly the opposite, THERE IS NO SECURITY!!! "SEcurity must be in the hands of the end stations, not the carriers." Yeah, I said that too. If the server is IPSec enabled and you are using an IPSec client, then fine. Regardless of the medium you use to communicate, there is no guaranteed security!

    11. Re:I love it but... by Tassach · · Score: 2
      You'd be suspicious if you saw a bunch of goons walking around the airport with walkie talkies... but a bunch of goons carrying wireless-linked laptops is ok? Sounds like one hell of a plot could be dreamed up with this kind of infrastructure in place. What are they thinking?
      How is this any worse than a bunch of goons carrying cell phones? Hell, last time I had to wait at an airport, anyone NOT talking on a cell phone would have looked suspicious. Mobile personal communications devices are ubiquitous now; we have to live with the implications of that reality. Cell Phones, wireless networks, etc are too useful to abandon just because Bad People might use them to do Bad Things.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    12. Re:I love it but... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      How is this any worse than a bunch of goons carrying cell phones?

      The difference is that with walkie talkies or wireless networks, many people can talk to one another simultaneously and instantly.

      With a cell phone, you have to dial the phone or at least be online constantly after dialing. You can have one, maybe two people on the other end. The same effect is not created.

    13. Re:I love it but... by Tassach · · Score: 2
      You can have one, maybe two people on the other end.
      The same effect is not created.


      Ever hear of a party line, or of a teleconferencing
      bridge? This is early 80's technology. You can dial
      in, hang up, call back, etc. With a modern cell phone,
      you have one-button (or voice-activated) dialing.
      This requires no more effort than what it takes to use the
      push-to-talk switch on a simplex walkie-talkie. The
      fact that you have a persistant, duplex voice channel
      once you are connected makes it much better, plus
      you have effectively unlimited range. The disadvantage
      of a cell phone is that it is not self-contained -- it requires
      an external infrastructure in order to function, but this
      is not an operational concern outside of a battlefield
      environment

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    14. Re:I love it but... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks for the tech update. I'm way outta date here!... hehe. :)

  5. Re:Well by swb · · Score: 2

    Of all the shit they built at that airport and the parking/construction hell it created, this is the least they could do for those of us with nothing else to do while we're grabbing our ankles for NWA.

  6. security? by hex1848 · · Score: 1

    Any mention of security practices? Are they running any sensitive data through the same infrastructure? With all the news about 802.11 security issues especially at airports this seems to be of utmost priority with all the terrorists running around.

    1. Re:security? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      See above comment on this being a "public, untrusted network." I got the impression that it was just a connection to the internet. That being the case, I'm not sure that it provides terrorists with anything over what they'd normally get through the internet. If you're doing something private, you should just use an IPSEC connection. You might want to think twice about entering passwords for your favorite sites unless you're using SSL.

      On the other hand, the whole thing might be useful for catching terrorists who felt the need to shoot out a last minute email -- provided that traffic is monitored closely.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    2. Re:security? by CptnKirk · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I was wondering the same thing. Will existing systems migrate to this architecture. I'd assume not. First they already have an architecture in place, why rip it out? After all, the physical terminals and check-in stations aren't moble.

      Second, there are security concerns and as you pointed out, these are two fold. We don't want people snooping the airlines system. On the other hand if we're using the system to say, pre-pay for a rental car at the destination, we don't want people snooping credit card numbers either. There has been a lot of talk in the past about insecure 802.11 networks. It was my impression that these networks were configured incorrectly, and that it is possible (with later high bit key tech) to have a secure network. If the airports were to offer a good secure network, I think it would be of great benefit to flyers.

      And then there are all the fun apps like being able to monitor arrivals and departures from your palm. As well as gate changes and whatnot. These can be as insecure as you like because it's really just another way of disseminating public information.

      In all I think it'll be a good thing, with problems at first, but will become the norm in time. As far as The Man snooping the network, I think you'll get that no matter where you go. Don't not use a great public utility for that reason alone.

    3. Re:security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I work in the airport software field, and I can assure you that sensible airports will never migrate their existing non-mobile systems to wireless. They are already aware of the security implications of cable-based networking, so wireless would be a definite no-no. Wireless for passengers would be straight to the net, probably only allowing common ports, blocking known pr0n sites and restricting bandwidth.

      Passenger lists, baggage checkin and the sort is under the control of the airlines, not the airport. Since most airlines are still stuck in the 1980s when it comes to hardware and software, I wouldn't worry about wireless for a while.

      Monitoring flight info from your palm/laptop - you can do that now (some airports have pages available just for that, e.g. Incheon Airport, South Korea).

  7. Apple slogan... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Use your Airport(tm) at the airport"?

    Mad Apple promotion? Or useful technology?

    Cryptnotic

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Apple slogan... by Megs · · Score: 1
      "Use your Airport(tm) at the airport"?

      My mom thought, until I actually got my Airport(tm) home and set up, that it was for using my laptop at the airport. (Yes, I did try to explain.) I'm not sure why she was going along with dropping $350 to kill a couple of hours to and from university every semester....

      Meghan

      --
      Ask me about LOOM(TM).
  8. Free wireless networks... by Nijika · · Score: 2
    I think they should limit it to web ONLY. In local experiments with free and open wireless networks, it was found that the best practice was to allow web only though a transparent proxy, because when there's no network accountability everybody seems to turn in to a script kiddie.

    My thoughts anyway..

    HEY WAIT A MINUTE, perhaps they'll be doing this and gathering marketing data? Could be easily done, and profitable over a 5 year timespan.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:Free wireless networks... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
      because when there's no network accountability everybody seems to turn in to a script kiddie.

      Or a filez 133ch. Let's see... www dot giganews dot com... alt.binaries.anime... extract binaries... :-)

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  9. Watch out! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    Call me paranoid. But this is a security problem. Not just the standard wireless insucurity, but also the airport may sniff your packets.

    1. Re:Watch out! by C4v3_7r0ll · · Score: 1

      the airport may sniff your packets.

      Let 'em sniff my packets! I won't be SYN flooding anyone while National freakin' Guard troopers are walking around with M-16s...

  10. In other news.... by PetzoldC · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news, 80% of hotels near airports have been shut down shut down due to lack of interest.

  11. There goes the neighborhood... by Havokmon · · Score: 2

    Airlines are cheap-ass companies. Next thing you know, when an Airline moves its own computer terminals, they'll say "Hey, we don't have to run any wire, we can just piggy-back on this wireless thing.."

    This being the community of paranioa, need I say more?

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  12. Suppose you did this by RC514 · · Score: 1

    Let's suppose you provided freely accessible wireless network infrastructure to anonymous users, what would be the legal implications of such an endeavour? Would you become liable for damage created with the help of your network? What if you provided no access to the internet? Would you still be liable? Is there a way around these problems? I guess once again lawyers may be the biggest hurdle before public networks become a reality.

    --

    1. Re:Suppose you did this by davidhan · · Score: 1

      The airport, or whoever is responsible for the access, would probably get treated like an ISP, which would have immunity from liability caused by users in most cases.

    2. Re:Suppose you did this by RC514 · · Score: 1

      But wouldn't you have to reveal who used a given ip address at a specified time in case law enforcement asks you for it? How would you do that, considering network access is anonymous, and failing that, wouldn't you become liable yourself?

      --

    3. Re:Suppose you did this by NevDull · · Score: 2

      It's only a matter of time until a "terrorist" sends a mean e-mail from a hotmail account on a public connection, and it gets shut down for harboring terrorists.

    4. Re:Suppose you did this by davidhan · · Score: 1

      I have not researched this issue, but I am not aware of any law (case or statutory) which would impose liability for a failure to provide identifying information where it is practically impossible to do so, assuming generally an ISP would have to turn over such information if it had it. This is not legal advice.

  13. bye bye Karma by Em+Emalb · · Score: 0, Troll

    OK, here goes my precious karma ;-) but the only thought that came to my mind was:

    That's nice. now hire more and better train your security people. It won't matter what you need to do on your laptop if the airport blows up.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  14. pr()n...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a whole new pr()nduit...

  15. Security? by SlipJig · · Score: 1
    You have to wonder, given the vulnerabilities wireless networking has displayed, how soon this is going to become a problem. If (when) some big corporate honcho's laptop running XP gets cracked, will it affect any plans the airport security agencies have for things like face recognition, etc.?


    Regardless, pretty cool of them for implementing it.

    --
    Read my keyboard review.
  16. Baggage Hacking by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This throws back to that other story about how airports are using unsecured wireless networks to check baggage at the sidewalk.
    Who wants to bet they're not going to have the security they need to protect themselves because they go with the lowest contract bid?

    Scenario:
    Felon A puts semtex in a bag, and checks it at the curb, but never gets on the plane. Felon B is inside the airport and reassigns that bag to a passenger who DID get on the plane. Since the passengers and bags now match they won't do a cargo search for the unclaimed baggage.
    Boom.

  17. Will it *really* be that cheap? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1
    Here's how much it will cost the airport: $0. The corporate traveler: $0. Joe Traveler: $0, if he has a wireless laptop or handheld; otherwise, $6 to $8 for the day.

    That sounds really great-- but I have a hard time believing that something this useful would be that cheap (or free!). Not that it couldn't be, but I think someone's going to see an opportunity to make a big profit off this and capitalize on that. Just like the way that companies are attempting (with varying levels of success) to make money from the free parts of the Internet (like domain names).

    I'd love to be proven wrong though.

    mark
    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Will it *really* be that cheap? by boopus · · Score: 1

      Well, hopefully they'll realize that they can't do it for free and start offering it cheaply instead of going down in flames. I'd happily pay $5 for a day pass. I spend more than that on newspapers/magazines each time I fly. If instead they start charging $30 for the day because "they need to be profitable" no one without an expense account will be able to use it.

  18. Is it really free? by PowerTroll+5000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The system, which cost only $250,000 to install

    At $250,000, sounds like it's far from free to me!

    --

    I'm not afraid of falling, it's the sudden stop at the end that frightens me.

    1. Re:Is it really free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quarter of a million dollars is chump change to an airport... especially a very busy on like MSP.

  19. Abuse over wireless networks by xercist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the ever-growing use of wireless links for IP data, how much more difficult will it become to track down abusers?
    If I sat in an airport with a laptop, I could use the (surely) fat pipe of the building to DoS some poor person, and who would catch me? The user reports to his isp, who gives it to the airport's upstream provider who give it to airport personnel. By that time, I'm way the hell out of there.
    Of course, I'm using "I" in this post hypothetically - I hate DoS and the packet kiddies that do it, but what security is being put in place to prevent it?

    --

    --
    grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
    1. Re:Abuse over wireless networks by Fastolfe · · Score: 2

      They've already started. I wouldn't go so far as to say my network has been attacked from airport users, but I've had some "nuisances" doing their deeds from airports before.

      I think the abuse issue is very serious. All you need is a script kiddie field trip to an airport for a bit and you have almost no accountability. How many airports would dispatch security guards with detection equipment to isolate an offender? How fast would that ever happen? Scary.

    2. Re:Abuse over wireless networks by Washizu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You could be thwarted two ways:

      1. The airport could lower the bandwidth available to individual users or at least monitor severe spikes in bandwidth use caused by one user. Once they see you doing it, it isn't tough to shut you off.

      2. Denial of Service attacks from a single user are history. All reasonable targets have protections against single users. The real damage is done by Distributed Denial of Service attacks where a large number of nodes flood a target.

      Granted, your point was how to catch abusers of the system and not that your attack would necessarily work. This problem plagues all wireless networks. While it may be difficult to track you down to an exact location, you are still in a post 9/11/01 airport. They are on the lookout for strange behavior.

      I don't envy the first 'terrorist' caught packet flooding his least favorite web server.

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    3. Re:Abuse over wireless networks by rlowe69 · · Score: 2

      I could use the (surely) fat pipe of the building to DoS some poor person, and who would catch me?

      Assuming there's no per-user cap on bandwidth, which is unlikely enough, but ...

      It also assumes there's no one at the airport monitoring abuse of the system, which is very unlikely, especially on a $250,000 network. If they have the network set up right, they could triangulate your position (or at least the offending computer), tell security, and they'd be on your ass in a few minutes. But I'd still like to see someone try it. :)

      --
      ----- rL
    4. Re:Abuse over wireless networks by pyite · · Score: 1

      Not likely they could triangulate you. Confine the search area to a radius around an access point? Yes. As far as I know you can't be connected to more than one access point at once so it really depends on one access point.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    5. Re:Abuse over wireless networks by Forrestina · · Score: 1

      not quite true. someone i know works at apple, they've got software using multiple airport base stations can get a rough triangulation of a client machine.

      --

      -------
      "don't smoke, don't drink, don't fuck
      at least i can fucking think"
      Minor Threat

    6. Re:Abuse over wireless networks by pyite · · Score: 1

      Hrmph. That's quite interesting. It makes sense that they can do it... I just didn't realize it was possible to monitor one client with multiple stations.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Well, that would be useless. by sulli · · Score: 2
    Unless the thing supports IPSec, it would be 100% useless for business travelers, who would be the ones using it. So that would be in fact the worst practice possible.

    A transparent firewall blocking non-standard services might be useful, but keep IPSec, POP/SMTP, etc.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Well, that would be useless. by sllort · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless the thing supports IPSec, it would be 100% useless for business travelers

      Last time I was at the IETF, in Pittsburgh, Marconi was running the show and gave everyone 802.11 cards. I plugged mine into my notebook and fired up my Ethernet sniffer, which collected approximately 700+ webmail username/password pairs, over 100 POP logins, a good littering of telnet logins, a bunch of tunneled CIFS logins, and other assorted good stuff. Enough to crack into a user account at a large portion of the represented telco R&D firms. What I learned at IETF that year: the telecommunications world was still too stupid to be allowed to own wireless ethernet.

      That was the IETF. This is an airport. IPSEC? Nah. It's easier to jail the occasional teenager for "sniffing" than it is to actually fix the problem.
      --
      You're reading Managed Agreement.

    2. Re:Well, that would be useless. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Guglielmo Marconi is still around?! And still involved with wireless communication media, I see...

    3. Re:Well, that would be useless. by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 1

      Was that the one where at the end of one workgroup meeting a guy projected a slide of all the passwords he had captured--except those that were too close to the username?

      Pretty funny, really.

    4. Re:Well, that would be useless. by toby360 · · Score: 1

      So your saying that using 802.11 you can sniff the entire network around you? Isn't this a HUGE security risk? Especially at an airport. I work in an office where alot of our employees (Most of them suits with $5000 laptops only used to edit work documents at 10wpm, browse the web every now and then and play solitare for half the day), and unless you have a very nicely locked down computer and/or a local firewall up on that PC, alot of Companies would not want their laptops in such a public area without proper security. If you can also sniff the network it means you can DOS it too. Most of the bandwith will probably be wasted on the wanna be haxor in the corner and kazaa downloads. Suppose they catch someone flooding the network with useless packets, how do they go about catching them? Kindly ask everyone in the room to give them their MAC Address?

      I wish airports would look into these things a little bit more. Coming from the private sector, 250K sounds pretty steep too.

    5. Re:Well, that would be useless. by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 2

      Ah HAH!

      You've just given me a great idea on how to upgrade from cattle class to business class!

      --
      "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    6. Re:Well, that would be useless. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      This is where systems need to make use of SSL on top of whatever low-level transport is being used. The airport should be using SSL for any wireless check-ins its doing and business travellers should be encouraged to use solutions where encrypted passwords and connections are used - of course it would be nice if more companies started equipping their external e-mail gateways with SSL support to prevent not only password snooping, but also snooping of the contents of the e-mails.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    7. Re:Well, that would be useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a good littering of telnet logins

      Any business that allows its employees to telnet to anything, rather than at very least using SSH, deserves what it gets. How long before Windows includes a built-in SSH client?

    8. Re:Well, that would be useless. by sllort · · Score: 2

      Any business that allows its employees to telnet to anything, rather than at very least using SSH, deserves what it gets.

      Any automobile owner who does not own LoJack (tm) in today's auto theft market deserves what they get. Car theft is completely ubiquitous today, with 1 out of every 15 Honda Accords being stolen. Only an IDIOT would fail to employ a third party keyless entry system and LoJack!

      In short, I don't blame the criminal. I blame the victim.
      --
      You're reading Managed Agreement.

    9. Re:Well, that would be useless. by nexthec · · Score: 1

      LoJack costs money, SSH costs nothing. I see this as a matter for the admin to deal with, and if every one of my company vehicles could magically just drive into my building without the slightest security check, walk up to my filing cabent, xerox all the files, and walk out without getting noticed. while the person responsible for driving the truck no notice, I would have each vehicle have an alarm.

    10. Re:Well, that would be useless. by sllort · · Score: 2

      SSH costs nothing

      If your system comes with Telnet, and you're not a security expert, installing SSH costs time, which is money. Installing a free standards compliant SSH client on all your Windows boxes (does such a thing exist?) takes time, which is money. Using telnet to steal information requires a criminal to present false credentials (user/pass or some other hack) in order to break in and steal data.
      --
      You're reading Managed Agreement.

    11. Re:Well, that would be useless. by Jamuraa · · Score: 2, Informative

      > a free standards compliant SSH client on all your Windows boxes (does such a thing exist?)

      Like PuTTY?

      --
      You can't see this if you have sigs turned off.
    12. Re:Well, that would be useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time I run into you, I'll be sure to kick you in the crotch then give you a courtesy boot to the head. I blame YOU(tm) for not working out and wearing a steel codpiece.

      Note that neither of the above apply if you DO work out AND wear a steel codpiece.

    13. Re:Well, that would be useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently. i love asking stupid questions on slashdot; someone will always answer them.

      thanks.

    14. Re:Well, that would be useless. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      Unless the thing supports IPSec, it would be 100% useless for business travelers, who would be the ones using it. So that would be in fact the worst practice possible.

      Any business traveller for a company with an IT department worth anytyhing will have an IPSec client with either PKI or RSA SecurID authentication on their laptop, and that is the ONLY way they can possibly access the company infrastructure. How the hell else would you do it in a public place like an airport? Unless by support you mean "The firewall/router is configured to properly pass IPSec and IKE traffic"

    15. Re:Well, that would be useless. by sulli · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I meant. The parent post implied that it might be web only - which would prevent the very normal practice of using IPSec for remote access over the internet (which I am using, with SecurID for authentication, to post this very message). Passing IPSec normally would be the appropriate design for airport/AirPort.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    16. Re:Well, that would be useless. by nexthec · · Score: 1

      I feel that if I have valuble information on a computer about my employees, then I am obligated to protect their information, which means controlling acces. Thats why lots of places lock up thier SSN paperwork and so on, and dont give out information to anyone. You abviously dont know a great deal about security, Their are a great deal of SSH clients out their for windows taht are free, Putty is one, OpenSSH, and a variety of others. Most (modern) unices include SSH deamons and clients as well, they just need to be enabled. If your running Windows, you need to install Telent explicetly, and you could(almost as easily) install SSH onto an NTor XP machine(not really sure why you would want too, but anyways)

  22. This will last long... by eric434 · · Score: 2, Funny

    until l33t w4r3z d00d #1853259 fires up his IRC client and starts surfing #isos-R-us. Guess what happens? Joe Email-Checking Buisiness man notices that he's getting .001Kb/sec, and pummels #1853259, until the *other* guys on #isos-R-us come on over from the other side of the airport...

    People are human. Lotsa bandwith+free+no accountability=ISO FRENZY!!! :)

    --
    This .sig temporary until a better .sig can be constructed.
    1. Re:This will last long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bandwidth problem is easy to solve, you just rate limit the client so any client can only use a designated amount of bandwidth, or QOS the traffic so all bandwidth is available but more important (and Im not sure what would be more important) traffic gets a higher priority. Assuming a competent network, one or both of these features would be implemented.

  23. Airport? by stylewagon · · Score: 2

    Why go all the way to the airport when you can get plenty of wireless coverage for next to nothing* (here in Sydney at least)

    *conscience not included

    --

    *** I am the real stylewagon

  24. Finally 802.11 for the masses by ajknott · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been a huge fan of public access to 802.11 devices connected to the internet. With enough access points at high-density points (airports, malls, coffee shops, etc...), the system could become almost as transparent as the cell-phone system is today, and free at that!

    I heartily encourage everyone with a home network and highspeed internet to purchase an 802.11 access point and place it by a window. Just make sure that you place the access point is on the external side of your firewall.

    1. Re:Finally 802.11 for the masses by spudnic · · Score: 1

      Why free? Is cell phone service free in your area? I know it's cheap, but it's not free. Someone has to pay for all that bandwidth. Maybe the airport considers it a service to their customers. What price can you put on keeping passangers sort of happy when their plane has been delayed for many hours by giving them something to do.

      But what about everywhere else? Like I said before, bandwidth is not free.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
  25. Other free wireless networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I find free wireless networks outside of most businesses :)

  26. Great - but how much will it cost to use? by Hentai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's two ways they could do this:

    1. They could make it cheap, and ensure that just about anyone at an airport can get minimal 'net access, or

    2. They could make it expensive, and ensure that high-class business-types can get a fat pipe.

    Of course, the OPTIMAL solution would be to do both: Rent a low-bandwidth node for $5.00/hour, or a high-bandwidth node for $0.25/minute.

    If they choose to only provide an expensive connection for corporate use, though, I'm not sure it'll be a step in the right direction.

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  27. Low Budget Colocation! by leifw · · Score: 5, Funny
    See, this is how it works:
    1. Find some little used broom closet in MSP.
    2. Slap your (linux|*bsd) boxen in aforementioned closet with wireless cards.
    3. Note which IP address your boxes pick up through DHCP, or better still have your boxes report their IP address to another of your boxes.
    4. Walk away.
    5. Remotely administer.
    1. Re:Low Budget Colocation! by jbf · · Score: 2

      6. Have the security personnel haul it away as unattended luggage... get charged with theft of service and reckless endangerment

    2. Re:Low Budget Colocation! by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

      If you do it right, I could go unnoticed for a long time. Just put your stuff in a metal box, and paint it aviation orange. Then put a couple of placards on it that say things like "Property of the FAA", "Tampering with this device is a federal offense", etc. Put a couple of fake serial numbers on it as well. That should quell the curiosity of lower-level staff for a while.

      However, when someone finally sees through the disguise it won't just be hauled away it will probably be "disarmed" by the bomb squad.

      This is just such a bad idea.

      I'm not even going to mention that you'd have to find a space beyond the checkpoints, and you can't get there without a ticket.

    3. Re:Low Budget Colocation! by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

      err, "... it could go unnoticed ..."

    4. Re:Low Budget Colocation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another thing to worry about is that 2600 meets at the Mall of America (MOA) and the airport is "just across the street" from MOA. Maybe it's time to think about a location change for 2600?

    5. Re:Low Budget Colocation! by Nightpaw · · Score: 2

      "I / it could go unnoticed"

      I am on to your plan, terrorist boy!

    6. Re:Low Budget Colocation! by nvts-NUTS · · Score: 1

      Better yet. Build your system with a both a wireless card and a commercial wireless modem with a range of 2 miles or so. If the system was built into an offical looking box that was screwed to the wall in some back closet you would be able to have free service as long as you don't mind living under the droning hum of airplanes taking off and landing all day/night.

    7. Re:Low Budget Colocation! by aztektum · · Score: 1

      And to keep unsuspecting janitors away just tape a note on top saying it's part of the network do not touch

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
  28. Vancouver International has had 802.11 for a while by muonzoo · · Score: 1

    Vancouver International Airport (YVR) has had a Nokia system installed for some time now. It works very well and rates have varied from free (on trials) to 9.95$ CDN / day (ISTR). Hopefully this sort of thing will catch on because it is a very nice service to have while you wait for your flight. Especially these days, where you are potentially spending several hours at the airport prior to your flight.

  29. Now just hold on there! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
    Has Attorney General Ashcroft heard about this yet? Has he approved such a thing? I mean, seriously, the coordination with which a terrorist network could launch a global 'world killer' terrorist attack if all airports start doing this could be disasterous(sp?)! I'd prefer we just all be forced to let the rent-a-friskers look through all the pr0n on our laptops before giving up our security to the terrorists.

    (P.S. - Hey Ashcroft, seal off the borders to fix the problem first, you dumbass. Quit treating us common folk like common criminals.)

    1. Re:Now just hold on there! by spudnic · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Do you think they'd go sit in an airport, plan the mission via the net while they're waiting for the plane, then do it? That's ridiculous.

      They would have all plans made out beforehand. If any type of final coordination needs to take place, that can be done over a cell phone.

      Get real. I'm so tired of people trying to take away things just in case somebody decided to use it for evil at some point. Anything can be used to cause problems. We can't just get rid of or not do everything that could be misused. We wouldn't have anything left.

      If somebody wants to blow something up, given sufficient time and/or money they will succeed. Making my life less enjoyable won't help that very much at all.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    2. Re:Now just hold on there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you once again, for proving that, yes Virginia, some people have NOOOO sense of humor.

  30. great by unred · · Score: 1

    With all the "terrorism" buzzword going around, this really could help out airlines. (or atleast, the coffee shops in and around the airports.)

    It looks like a very cool hookup (with a name like iPass, and with a 250,000 bill to foot, i'ld hope so ;) Future expansion plans in Detroit have almost left me drooling. Glad to see more companys jumping on the starbucks bandwagon, they can't lose.
    --

    --
    can't fight against the youth.
  31. Vancouver International Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Vancouver International airport in British Columbia, Canada, has had this for over a year. Might even be two if I remember correctly.

  32. Nice, but what about Security concerns...... by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    This would honestly be a great convience for me, I spend a lot of time waiting in airports (up to 10 hours a week), and if I could get some decent Internet access I could be more productive and not to mention much less bored. Also it would be nice to get something back for all my airport fees and the outrageous rates they charge to park.

    One problem though, anyone considered security? I personally have enough sense to have some rudimentary filter software on my company laptop (ip-chains), but this would be a lot of exsposure for MANY MANY companies, as most of the people travelling with laptops are NON-Tech savvy pointy haired manager/exec types. Anyone have thoughts on that?

  33. I thought /. was about news??? by __aaqwna9206 · · Score: 1

    Wireless internet services in aitports isn't new!!! CPH in Copenhagen, Denmark installed it several month ago. Shape up guys! Stay alert!

  34. Some have a head start... by vreeker · · Score: 1

    Some airports already have the infrastructure that they use for baggage checks.

    Now every run down to you nearest money grubbing airport and eavesdrop... err... I mean connect to the net and browse slashdot.

    --
    brr its cold up here, some want to pass me a polar bear skin?

  35. Anti-terrorism and wireless networks by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Big mistakes for terrorists:

    Asking airport officials how to log on to your "al-Qaida Online" account over the wireless link.

    Complaining that you can't talk to your "buddy" Osama even though he's on your buddy list.

    Receiving and watching a Quicktime video with instructions for committing a terrorist act -- while sitting in the boarding area.

    Having your laptop announce "You've Got Jihad!" while in the terminal.

    1. Re:Anti-terrorism and wireless networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not funny.

      It reminds me of the kind of lame jokes that guy on Office Space would make up (get it? it's a jump to conclusions mat). Hahahaha. Lol. Blah.

      Sheesh.

    2. Re:Anti-terrorism and wireless networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It reminds me of the kind of lame jokes that guy on Office Space would make up

      But it got me 3 Karma points!

      Besides, if three moderators thought it was funny, maybe it's just you that doesn't have much of a sense of humor.

  36. Virus Launch by IceFox · · Score: 2

    Looking at the bad side:

    If I were ever trying to launch some virus or whatnot using one of these open networks would be just the place were all they would have to so was probably drive through the drop off section...

    Anyone else see this as a problem?

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    1. Re:Virus Launch by Soko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No need to bother - it's likely been done already.

      Anyone using Windows 2000 on thier laptop that's unpatched for Code Red will get infected right away. There will undoubtedly be some schmuck - who's laptop is already r00ted - that will be waltzing through the airport broadcasting away that particular snippet of malicious code. Bleah.

      There should be some qualification system before you get on a public network like this, IMHO.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Virus Launch by spudnic · · Score: 2

      What kind of qualification system would you propose? Each user has to pass a test? Each machine must be tested by network security personnel?

      No, if this is going to work it can't be a pain. You've got to be able to turn on your laptop and start working, or at a maximum have to just pay a fee for use.

      Could they make payment kiosks where you swipe your credit card and insert your pcmcia card into a slot so it can read the mac address and then allow access based on that? If you did this it seems that there could be at least some level of accountability.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    3. Re:Virus Launch by Pyrrus · · Score: 1

      ifconfig eth0 down

      ifconfig eth0 hw ether *desired-MAC-addy* up

      dhclient

      yeah, that's a whole lot of accountablility I'm
      gonna have....

    4. Re:Virus Launch by spudnic · · Score: 2

      The thought that I had was that only verified mac addresses would have access to the wireless network. I know it's easy to override the hardware mac address, but once you change it the system no longer accepts connections from you.

      Does that clear up what I was saying, or am I totally missing something.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    5. Re:Virus Launch by Pyrrus · · Score: 1

      That does clear it up a bit.. the one remaining
      option is to find someone running winblows (while
      passive sniffing) crash their computer somehow
      (buffer overflows in win filesharing work well)
      then take their ip and mac addy, although that is
      quite a bit less smooth and doesn't always work.
      At my local college wireless network, the router
      authenticates you with straight dhcp, but you must
      enter a password for the router to accept your packets, so we sometimes crash a computer (since we're on the local network) and take their
      addy's. if you couldn't even do dhcp, you'd have to forge the packets (not too hard since you could sniff the response) and know the gw/dns ip's as well (but you can get that by logging on legitimately and writing them down)

  37. Flight delayed, laptop hacked. by Marsh+Jedi · · Score: 5, Funny

    The number of people who leave open shares on their Wintel laptops is ridiculous, as they are used to being behind NAT firewalls and other hard-shelled security, deep in the corporate intranet. Then they move these absolutely defenseless laptops into a completely unsecured network via an Orinoco WaveLAN card--Hilarity ensues.

    A public wireless network with a revolving roster of addled sales execs is a veritable shooting gallery, the proverbial barrel full of fish!

    Anyway, I will not be surprised when suits rush back to the home office after a stopover in Minneapolis, their laptops having mysteriously come down with the clap.

    1. Re:Flight delayed, laptop hacked. by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

      they may not comedown with the clap
      but i can tell you if i was in to corprate esbeniaugh i would be hanging out at the air port lookin for secrets or anything i could get my hands on.

    2. Re:Flight delayed, laptop hacked. by KupekKupoppo · · Score: 1

      mod parent up, it's rather important.

    3. Re:Flight delayed, laptop hacked. by darien · · Score: 1, Funny

      esbeniaugh, n. = ESPIONAGE [from Fr. espionnage] The practice or employment of spies.

      -- Oxford Dictionary of Wantonly Misspelt Words (Oxford: Clarendon P, 2002)

    4. Re:Flight delayed, laptop hacked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and me without mod points. If I'd read this a second sooner, I'd be pouring coke out of my keyboard instead of typing this.

    5. Re:Flight delayed, laptop hacked. by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, funny. But who the hell says that they have to open up the fscking netbios ports? Or anything other than port 80???? And even better, if they block incoming everything (boo hoo can't run servers in the airport) and block the internal subnet from talking to anyone else on the internal subnet then NOTHING you cite could possibly be a problem. That's like 5 minutes setup with any proper firewall software.

      But I guess they're all too stupid to have thought of anything as simple as that...
      (Frighteningly though, you may be right)

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    6. Re:Flight delayed, laptop hacked. by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      If your also sitting in the waiting lounge waiting for that fligt then they would be completly open to you! Same WLAN!

      Hey at least it gives us something more interesting to do while waiting for that damn flight! :)

    7. Re:Flight delayed, laptop hacked. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Yes, funny. But who the hell says that they have to open up the fscking netbios ports? Or anything other than port 80????

      I think his [valid] point was that airports will suddenly become popular for hackers with wireless cards and laptops. What good is an airport firewall if the hackers are already behind it?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  38. Louisville Airport; probably others by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 2

    This happened in the Louisville, KY Airport back in May 2001... here's the article.

    Curious that this is happening in some of the smaller airports first. I'd have expected San Francisco's airport to be an early adopter. They certainly spent enough on construction costs to throw in a few wireless routers around without anyone noticing. Still, at least it's getting out there somewhere.

    1. Re:Louisville Airport; probably others by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2

      However the linked article does not say anything about free access. In fact, it says they aren't "sure what the charge will be for the service". And that it's MobileStar running the network, who are not known as a free wireless provider.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Louisville Airport; probably others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lexington Bluegrass Airport is/will? offer it.

  39. Call me a steinge, but... by Roger+Watson · · Score: 1
    This is not the sort of thing on which taxpayer dollars need to be spent. Why do I call the airlines' money "taxpayer dollars"? Well, the airlines are funded almost exclusively by the government in this country. Consider the following facts:
    • Just recently, after September 11th, Congress gave the major airlines a gift for $20 million to compensate them for their lack of profitability - a streak that started around the middle of 2000.
    • The FAA has only one enforcement action against the airlines: the removal of government subsidies. That's right - an airline can opt out of the FAA's air traffic control system, refuse to insure luggage, and allow smoking in domestic flights. But the consequences they would suffer - a termination of government funding - would keep them from competing with their socialized rivals.
    • When airlines are forced to make changes (safety/security improvements, etc.) the government automatically pays for 75% of the cost, minimum. No act of Congress or approval of any sort is needed before our tax money is put to this use.
    • Airline employees are technically classified as government workers and are subject to Federal hiring and retention procedures (read: affirmative action). That is why minority pilots and flight attendants are so commonplace, despite the fact that 96% of flight school graduates are Caucasian.
    I have studied the travel industry for over 13 years and have come to the conclusion that it is the most crooked, corrupt industry in America. They should be returning the money to the taxpayers' pockets, not buying 802.11b repeaters for passengers' web surfing amusement. As somebody who rarely flies, I am offended that my money is being wasted in this fashion.

    --rwatson

    1. Re:Call me a steinge, but... by zhensel · · Score: 2

      Do you really think that socializing air travel is a bad idea? A completely deregulated air travel industry would be a tremedous national liability as shown on September 11th. If you're ready to tell me that airlines would sacrifice greater profitability for the proper amount of security, I'd like to see any kind of source.

      The present problems in the airline industry come from a lack of federal oversight and funding; to say it's the otherway around is foolhardy at best. Notice the almost unbelievably low amount of new runways and airports built during a period when air travel rose by leaps and bounds - all following the deregulation of the air travel industry.

      Unless your advocating the elimination of any airline industry in the United States, I fail to see how your point is at all valid. The airline industry is entirely unique in its suceptibility to attack and role in our nation and the world and needs to be treated differently. Globally, nations with socialized air travel systems provide a far more convenient and secure solution. Perhaps this comes at the cost of higher ticket prices and an increased tax burden, but that's the price of living in a modern world.

    2. Re:Call me a steinge, but... by wmoore · · Score: 1

      You're full of it and obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Try actually talking to ANYONE that's actually in the industry for more than about 5 minutes and they could list 20 ways in which you are wrong.

      As the ONLY example of goverment subsidies you list the $20 million subsidy after 9/11. Ummm, ever think that the industry is a multi BILLION (with a B) dollar industry and the 20 million is a relative drop in the bucket? And that's just in the USA alone ...

      The FAA has only one enforcement action???? are you nuts? The can revoke operating licenses, they can revoke pilots licenses, they can revoke maintenance abilities. Put simply, they can and have on occasion said, you can't fly inside of our borders, period. Not, we won't give you money, but more simply, you can't fly regardless of how you pay for it. If you carry a passenger for money (which even includes the passenger simply paying for more than a prorated share of the expenses of the flight), they have immense control over what you can and can't do.

      When airlines are forced to make changes the gov reimburses them????? hahahahahahahahahaha! I can't even stop laughing over this one. You're in a fantasy world. The government NEVER (well, I guess three may be a few exceptions, but I don't know of any) reimburses the airlines for mandated safety/secutiry changes.

      ok, and the last one, that employees are technically classified as gov workers. ummmm, no. They are not in ANY way shape or form classified as government workers. Can I clarify that any?? How about the guy that gives your poodle his monthly trim and wash? yea, well, he's just as much of a government employee as most airline employees. The only even slightly concevable exception to this is now airport security screeners, air traffic controllers, and a few people known as DARs (designated something reviewers). pilots? no. Flght attendants? no. check in people? no.

      Why don't you go back to the rock that you crawled out from under and give it a rest. You obviously have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.

      Will

  40. Dear God no!! by evilpaul13 · · Score: 1

    Terrorists could use this to organize attacks against us!! We'll have to make it illegal to use encryption to make the world safe!!

    Seriously though, using it "to access corporate networks and the Internet at high speeds." [from the article] How am I supposed to use it to access my company's network without VPN software? Aren't privacy right-fatalistic in the name of security Americans against "secret communications? Not trying to troll, but this is something to think about.

  41. Alien Device Creates Wireless "Blackhole" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll


    ....Tonight on Artbell [ www.artbell.com ] ARTBELLDOTCOM

    Middle Post!

    lick green death lick green when worn murder die lost puke how donkey puke the them yellow the worn slaughter slaughter squid virus slam if fall death how squid puss excreation is where where farm puke virus virus
    bleed yellow them how snort excreation squid lick excreation where yellow slam she lost excreation yellow virus lick puke when lick how he murder excreation found green he if puss found murder squid them worm them dirt murder lick
    green squid death squid where die if puke found slam lost the virus he slaughter worn fall fall lost worn slam snort die puss slaughter is slaughter slam she green puss the fall bleed slaughter is she farm she
    them yellow yellow is excreation die snort snort excreation she worm virus excreation bleed the murder if murder yellow donkey worn slaughter he how virus lost murder she when found found farm brain death die bleed lost lost green
    death virus worm murder puss brain worn green is worn worn die virus the bleed virus if worm death he bleed die worn lost green lost lick die puke murder lick found yellow death donkey puke yellow worm puss
    if worm how die farm them death found bleed bleed farm when worn if virus if found farm how slam worn yellow worn murder dirt virus lick virus he yellow snort slam die slam if dirt yellow murder when
    die bleed die fall yellow found virus die fall farm murder the excreation found slaughter fall puke fall dirt green snort where lost brain found snort donkey how lick when found slaughter where snort virus worm bleed green farm
    murder he brain donkey slaughter death murder slaughter squid when fall fall dirt how she fall bleed found virus the she slam where them when brain where die is he lick he when if squid slaughter how fall where
    how if worm snort squid slam lick where slam puss worn the squid brain puke lost puke farm yellow murder lost fall if donkey is them snort puss them fall them found die virus die them virus green death
    bleed murder virus found fall how if virus slam dirt slam puke murder virus farm puke slam brain he he worn lick puss brain dirt slaughter virus yellow if slaughter excreation where death excreation is if puke farm the
    brain worn she where worn green is she brain is when donkey the snort lost how dirt if death found he them found worn how slam donkey dirt donkey green virus die when virus is she lost worm the
    fall lost where brain when lick brain dirt brain yellow lick when slam green die puss donkey puke yellow where how worm is fall die how excreation bleed squid squid murder dirt slam is if murder worn brain slam
    where death squid the squid found is green lost bleed how murder she he excreation slam farm the virus if virus the farm he the is snort dirt them he lick puss worm worm if worm them slam lost
    yellow puke bleed die death squid when he brain lick donkey lost donkey virus puke slaughter slaughter bleed if dirt worm die worn the is farm murder virus brain he brain death them the squid them found she he
    death when slaughter excreation bleed donkey found dirt puke yellow if worn puke bleed he she bleed she lost donkey brain how when worn she slam green found snort slaughter how yellow murder where excreation worn slam death die
    brain farm slam donkey virus how puke brain is slam them lick when die the the yellow worn brain puke virus worn excreation how yellow she when die how yellow snort green the murder murder donkey murder worn slaughter
    worn them where die excreation puss fall the where she fall he bleed them farm slam puss is if squid slaughter squid dirt found dirt bleed snort excreation snort is slam death die squid bleed how brain yellow slam
    if worn the puke die worm death yellow if is squid he found bleed when them excreation lick if green found found die where worm them if snort yellow death donkey donkey where when die donkey murder death die
    them the the yellow lost slaughter brain puke brain green brain how slaughter green slaughter when squid is worn how green worm yellow fall slam die when when found the puss fall worm virus virus slaughter them donkey worn
    snort slam puke virus them bleed when excreation murder squid how snort murder worm if lick puke dirt worn them fall death virus virus she lick slaughter puss found the is puss squid murder death if slaughter where snort
    virus dirt slam squid squid them them how puss worn if green excreation how she slaughter lick where them green if puss when when slaughter excreation green where squid squid dirt she puss the he puss die slam excreation
    found death he farm brain farm found how death squid lost die snort slam is when virus worn donkey if lost if donkey dirt is fall puss farm die virus die murder if lick lost die green dirt worm
    worm slam green worm puke where farm he bleed puke squid donkey bleed if he virus he when slam snort slam how he lick she lick excreation murder murder brain when fall murder donkey the she green murder virus
    if die where death dirt brain snort virus slaughter if is death puss them farm excreation bleed virus slaughter them found puke brain excreation squid excreation die worn donkey she worn virus donkey yellow murder found he squid squid
    worm yellow worn if where farm dirt when dirt green fall die murder donkey if brain slaughter die murder lick squid when he the when she is the virus where how found worn worn puss green if excreation how
    worm them murder when donkey squid lost the slam if slaughter worn lick them excreation donkey green found snort she worn worn the if brain yellow death death them green is die dirt yellow worn them farm lost lost
    slaughter worm die them green die puss puss murder worm snort donkey how murder the the lick green puke murder snort lick bleed snort how if die puss worm farm green when die murder donkey lick how lost lost
    found the worn when murder when slam donkey donkey murder fall fall excreation fall excreation worm the death donkey dirt them when slaughter donkey puss puss is bleed worm if brain excreation if found puke fall dirt farm is
    if fall worn them the slaughter he slam he lick found she murder lost puss slaughter when brain worm lick bleed snort death puss bleed fall where found lick die puss die death how lick she is virus the
    dirt found is found slam murder murder slam worn found he them excreation squid brain yellow puke the brain slaughter yellow donkey donkey found puke death she yellow death yellow snort is farm them he brain the puke where
    found worn slam dirt if is them snort is found fall he worm the if murder green lost virus death is green green puss puke farm donkey slaughter death if where how slaughter when squid when murder the puke
    yellow yellow fall donkey is found yellow when puke lick fall worn them she lost fall murder brain worn where lick donkey found if death farm lost snort virus the green excreation is brain the the she puss worn
    the bleed when lost worn snort when murder slaughter puke squid lick puss green snort fall farm yellow lost worn she slam he them puke worn fall farm when green puss how murder dirt lost yellow worm when how
    fall he he brain dirt squid she she donkey puss the slam found if where brain lost farm if puke green die slaughter brain slam lick where is donkey lick bleed lick puke donkey lick bleed slam where virus
    puss farm green slaughter puke murder found she how she yellow lick them lost virus yellow where bleed dirt green die the worm when slaughter puss puke the yellow worm dirt slam puss where farm where them is fall
    lost squid she she is squid donkey puke fall if found squid virus murder slaughter slaughter death is slam is excreation virus worn found slam fall slaughter snort puss them virus them donkey found he murder lost bleed virus
    brain green fall death death donkey he yellow green donkey fall excreation when bleed green virus the how fall slam lost when dirt farm them dirt die how puss lick he puss how green dirt fall how she yellow
    how them puss slam farm the them is virus puke dirt when excreation she puke die the lost she she squid she fall found he fall if donkey yellow bleed die lost them murder worn dirt worm death worn
    lick dirt squid brain the dirt murder bleed donkey worm the when bleed fall death she excreation dirt brain lick farm worm when them dirt donkey slaughter die bleed slam worn when found virus brain worm where he dirt
    found excreation squid found when worm if die dirt when puss she how farm when brain where slaughter worn where slaughter snort slaughter fall donkey lost puss bleed death worn puke murder die them she worn brain if die
    donkey excreation puke donkey where death worn green donkey is she donkey worn virus is brain murder how slaughter how is found she death green green brain dirt die virus green yellow found is bleed brain dirt where where
    green worn brain bleed green worm farm fall he worn how lick she found when yellow brain slam death virus excreation fall slam die farm death where murder puke lost squid puke virus donkey she found he donkey donkey
    the worn the snort slaughter them she is them virus slam death excreation she worn brain is yellow them

  42. (in)Security by maggard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Everyone's first response to this is going to be "What about wireless security?"

    Well, what about it? How different is wireless from an airport different from that shared ethernet in the airport hotel? Or having folks check in from those ubiquitious web terminals in airports that half of the time have cache's full of info?

    Yes, it is possible that sitting there in the terminal your stream will get intercepted. So understand/teach others that these aren't secure, that pluggin in in *any* public pace isn't gonna be secure and certainly not at a client's office etc. Use a tunnel back to the home/corporate proxy server or don't go near any important content and *don't* use any passwords.

    But don't go getting all upset of wireless and airports, it's not really different from all of the others.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:(in)Security by nomadic · · Score: 1

      At some point you just have to say, "who cares?". What are hackers (oooh I didn't use the term crackers, quick flame him) going to gain from watching me read slashdot, or nytimes.com, or any number of sites I would read to stave off the mind-crushing boredom?

    2. Re:(in)Security by Miles · · Score: 1

      Well, I think the original poster was referring to using public access points (or even private ones that you have to pay to use) for work purposes. Just remember to tunnel everything through ssh.

    3. Re:(in)Security by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Well, somehow I don't think the common CFO or CEO or even Sales Director browses innocuous web sites. Mainly they want to download their plaintext email from "important people" that contain orders, contact info, product info, and/or generally other delicious tidbits of things they don't want you to know.

    4. Re:(in)Security by Col.+Panic · · Score: 2
      Yes, this may be no different from the airport hotel network (which I have not seen, however) but which corporate people travel most? Execs, of course - the people with some of the most interesting and valuable data. Of those execs, how many have clue #1 about desktop and/or network security? Very few, I am sure.

      I think it is a corporate IT/security officer's responsibility to ensure that corporate laptops follow these policies:

      good passwords (7 characters or more expiring every 30 days)

      pgp encryption of sensitive data

      have the server service disabled (on NT machines)

      no running NetBIOS unless absolutely necessary, and then only when bound only to the interface needed

      absolutely no web server (personal or otherwise)

      connections to the Internet via VPN connection to corporate LAN, *then* through the corporate proxy.

      802.11 what? no freaking way.

    5. Re:(in)Security by maggard · · Score: 2
      Yes, this may be no different from the airport hotel network (which I have not seen, however) but which corporate people travel most? Execs, of course - the people with some of the most interesting and valuable data. Of those execs, how many have clue #1 about desktop and/or network security? Very few, I am sure.
      I'm sorry - have you ever worked in a modern large corporate environment? You seem to have less of a clue of what is going on these days then most of the execs.

      which corporate people travel most? Execs, of course
      Execs aren't the only ones who travel, Salesdroids travel more.

      pgp encryption of sensitive data
      PGP isn't used; indeed PKI is almost off most folk's radar. NT & 2K both have reasonably secure file systems when set up properly, other certificates and passwords are used for email.

      good passwords (7 characters or more expiring every 30 days), have the server service disabled (on NT machines), no running NetBIOS unless absolutely necessary, and then only when bound only to the interface needed, absolutely no web server (personal or otherwise)
      Personal web server, good passwords, etc - well yeah, this is absolutely boilerplate stuff and indeed most laptops are so managed this isn't an issue at all.

      connections to the Internet via VPN connection to corporate LAN, *then* through the corporate proxy.
      You mean like I just described? VPN's are standard, the idea of using them for all connections is the one that has to be drilled home OR that one can only use such a connection for unimportant uses; check the weather / scores / flight info but nothing personal, private, or corporate.

      802.11 what? no freaking way
      Ok, so you really aren't anywhere near the point where you have any sort of real decision-making authority in a large environment.

      802.11 - yeah everyone wants it. On the other hand it takes time and budgets and justifications and security reviews and site surveys such but it is rolling out.

      These folks want to use the wireless in the airport public lounge or the ethernet jack in the SkyClub/RedTicket/GoldenKey lounge for premium travelers, as well as the port in their business class club floor hotel room and anywhere else they can get connected. These are the realities of business travel and are gonna happen; the trick is putting in policies and procedures and training so that they're not risks.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    6. Re:(in)Security by Col.+Panic · · Score: 2
      I'm sorry - have you ever worked in a modern large corporate environment?

      Yes, I work for a (really large) bank. Before that I worked for a large (Fortune 500) sporting goods store.

      Execs aren't the only ones who travel, Salesdroids travel more.

      True, but we don't employ many, so...

      PGP isn't used

      Bullshit - it's one of our pseudo-standards.

      most laptops are so managed this isn't an issue at all.

      When in the office, maybe, but do your desktop policies protect the machine when it is taken home and the user can install AOL regardless of whether it is expressly forbidden. Our written policy forbids it, but our NT policy does not prevent it, unfortunately.

      Ok, so you really aren't anywhere near the point where you have any sort of real decision-making authority in a large environment.
      802.11 - yeah everyone wants it. On the other hand it takes time and budgets and justifications and security reviews and site surveys such but it is rolling out.

      Please, we (and I am sure other banks) have DOS and Win 3.1 legacy apps still in use. Wireless is for testing only. In a large corporate environment, we don't even roll out the latest service pack without extensive testing and change control. Our corporate standard is still NT4 SP6. 2000 on laptops. These things are slow to change for a couple of reasons. Changes to application suites need to be implemented corporate wide for compatibility. Licensing costs for upgrading 5,000+ workstations is ... expensive. Service packs don't always work as advertised, or conflict with current applications or environment on which we rely.

      Wireless is a nice toy, but the security is not up to snuff. It's neat, shiny and desireable but that is just not reason enough to roll it out for quite a while yet.

  43. Dealing with Delays.. by pen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps this is just a strategy of dealing with the increased delay the FAA is forcing on the airlines?

  44. Secure? Hah. by Scoria · · Score: 1

    Let's hope that they've engineered a relatively foolproof way to ensure that user data (or their own data, in some cases; one airport was using unencrypted 802.11b to exchange sensitive data) cannot be sniffed by other people over the air.

    On a barely related note, I've heard that most "Wal-Mart Supercenters" (bleh, I hate that store) connect to their gasoline stations via 802.11b to transfer information.

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  45. London Heathrow by kruczkowski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I stoped at London Heathrow a few weeks ago and they have these "XPOD" kiosks or something similar, well they run windows 98 and connect with wireless. I pulled out my NAI Sniffer and found the ip address range 10.10.10.x/24 (if I remeber) then I assosiated myself to the network and found that all the kiosk machines have the 'c' drive shared out - full accsess! and NO PASSWORD. At least the internet connection was a bit more secure, they went threw a proxy server and when I tried to brouse the internet from my laptop all I got was the xpod logo.

    JKF at New York has some small network, but nothing intresting and no internet.

    Frankfurt (Germany) has also some network but also nothing fun, all I see is novell broadcasts.

    If anyone want, I still have the NAI .cap files. kruczkowski @ hotmail.com

    --
    hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  46. Security this.. Security that.. by ColbyR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been reading about everyone screaming 'ohh my god! its wireless! its not secure!' or 'the script kiddies are going to go nuts!' You _CAN_ secure this and make sure it is only used by 'good' people (i.e. not the #isosRus user) by simply only allowing IPSec connections out to the world this pretty much elimiates the script kiddie wishing to use 'mad bandwidth' to DoS down someone else and because all the users will be connecting to the rest of the world over a VPN to there office you dont really have to worry about them attacking things from the airport network. Another point of view would be to require users to 'check-in' by setting up a DHCP server that hands out 'dead ips' that can only access one web page. That web page would be a registration page where the fills in the blanks (MAC address, cell phone number, home address, etc..) then a back end script creates a reservation or some other method to privide a 'live' ip for that user to access the outside world. Said airport might also consider (if said airport is not blocking everything but lets say port 80, 443, and IPSec) going with the transparent proxy server that one of the other users talked about. Said airport could also use the customers airline ticket SN# to track the person. You could goto great trouble to attempt to curve the abuse by a few people.. Or you could watch for abuse and disable that MAC address on the network. At any rate. Cheers.

    --
    Real men don't use GUIs.
    1. Re:Security this.. Security that.. by laserjet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right. I am sick and tired of people screaming bloody murder anytime 802.11b is mentioned and how insecure it will be (and then they get modded up as insighfull?!?!?)

      802.11b can be made pretty secure, and it's not even that hard. Yes, wireless will never be secure as other methods, but it's not a big gaping whole either (or at least it doesn't have to be).

      So unless you know what you are talking about, /.ers, don't just continue on the same old rag about how it is not secure.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:Security this.. Security that.. by ColbyR · · Score: 1

      well to make the /. crowd happy maybe we can get the airports to setup a ARCnet network talk about secure.. I dont even think you can get pcmcia ARCnet cards anymore..

      --
      Real men don't use GUIs.
  47. MSP Wireless Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I didn't read the article too closely... but who's making the money on this endevour? Where's the rich white guy? MSP didn't do this out of the goodness of their heart.

  48. Re:Well by ZaMoose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why would you be bending over for a revolutionary Old School rap act? I mean, Dr. Dre was in N.W.A. and, oh yeah, the Napster thing...

    Oh, you mean Northwest Airlines! Silly me.

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  49. Wi--Fi standard by selway · · Score: 1

    This new network will be based on the IEEE 802.11 (Wi-fi) standard that is currently being used by Apple in its "airport" wireless system.

    This sounds like an excellent proposition, especially since the idea of internet kiosks for general web use has not caught on big in the U.S. How many times have you been stuck in a public place wishing you could only read an email with directions/phone number/ etc?

  50. Wireless Phone Provider's View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a PCS phone provider in Minneapolis.

    Concourse Communications also controls wireless phone access at MSP as well. Controls, as in, you go through them to obtain a lease to install equipment and/or antennas on the airport property.

    The problem is that they're dictating that we *must* use the "shared" system that they've installed. We've (and every other phone carrier) has refused so far. The problems are numerous, but boil down to:

    Who's going to fix a shared network when it breaks?
    Every carrier uses a different technology/frequency band. One size does not fit all.
    We don't share revenue. Period.

    The end result of this is that every property around the airport that can support a tower or antenna site, does now. And coverage inside the airport and parking structures are pretty poor as a result of it.

  51. Go Minnesota! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah... I'm a CSci student at the UofM and they've got wireless internet available from kiosks all over campus. Minneapolis is aparently all about wireless.

    1. Re:Go Minnesota! by Hank+Scorpio · · Score: 1

      Dang. I am a CSci grad from the U of M, and they didn't have that when I went there! They didn't even have ethernet in the dorms yet! Why, back in my day, we had to play DOOM on the networked SGI workstations in the computer lab. Boy, those were the days.. :)

      OK, so I was just a few years too early. :)

  52. VPN by CrazyDwarf · · Score: 1

    The company I work for has VPN setup for users who have internet access from home to connect to the company network. So if anyone from my company goes to that airport, we can still use it free. Who is going to pay for this service?

    --
    It's easy to stand out when the general level of competence is so low.
    1. Re:VPN by pyite · · Score: 1

      How can you "still use it free"? You can't. You still need a physical layer, data link layer, and network layer connection upon which your VPN can operate. This is how they make their money.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  53. I'll rip out my left testicle when its "free" by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    I wonder what they mean by "free." Must be one of those Mortgage company kind of freebies. Maybe they mean the signals are "Free" to travel in 3 dimensions since its wireless. Maybe they mean its "free" to bring your own laptop into the airport. As I said. When it becomes free I will rip out my left testicle. Thats my pledge. Hey, I do what I can, you know!?

    1. Re:I'll rip out my left testicle when its "free" by icedivr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I hope you've fathered all the children you plan on. It is indeed free, if you bring the hardware. If you want to use the kiosk, you pay.

      This is kind of funny in light of the recent article discussing security devices running on unsecured 802.11b networks (as if there's another sort of 802.11 network) You won't even look out of place walking around with airsnort running...

    2. Re:I'll rip out my left testicle when its "free" by poptix_work · · Score: 1

      Actually I helped build (and personally secured and maintained the actual network) of what was then then largest 802.11 (3mbit frequency hopping spread spectrum) network (it's now the second largest, and the company went bankrupt =)

      it worked okay except for the crackhead 'engineer' using zip ties to hold the antennas to grain elevators and water towers that nobody was paying for access to.. oh, knowing something about RF to begin with helps when you claim to be an RF engineer =)

      Good idea, bad implementation, that's why the company went bankrupt.. unfortunately this guy will just move on to the next unwitting company and get screwed again.

      --
      Just because you disagree doesn't make it offtopic or flamebait.
  54. how do you trace the cracker? by 2Bits · · Score: 2
    If a cracker is attacking a system from an airport terminal, using the free wireless LAN, and a script kiddie releases a new virus from there, how can you trace them thru IP? The only thing you know is that it came from a laptop from that airport terminal, and that's it.

    1. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by hex1848 · · Score: 1

      you should have a log of his cards MAC address. It could take some time but im sure you could track down that MAC address being used from an other location and nab the script kiddie that way.

    2. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      won't help. MAC addresses too can be spoofed.

    3. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      actually, you'll be able to trace it all the way to the original "hub".
      Then you pull up all the video from that cavered area at the airport, and the time it happened.
      then you profile the people with laptops.
      then you begin investigating those pepole who fit your profile.
      is it 100%? no, but the people who do this kind of work are damn good.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it 100%? no, but the people who do this kind of work are damn good.

      I hope you're not talking about the airport security chiefs . . . you know, like the ex-chauffer who ran Logan security until Mohammed Atta and his buddies decided to use it for their own personal skyjacking hub?

    5. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by thelaw · · Score: 2

      on the other hand, it would also be trivial to change the MAC address every time you associate with a wireless network. heck, every two minutes if you're paranoid. and there are a lot of available MACs!!!

      jon

      --
      -- http://www.cerastes.org
    6. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by Tipsy+McStagger · · Score: 1

      You'll just end up with de:ad:be:ef or something like that

    7. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by pyite · · Score: 1

      Let's assume he's an idiot and doesn't change the MAC address thats being used for the (R)ARP requests. What are the odds you're gonna find that same exact MAC address on another public wireless network? Are you gonna monitor every single one in the world in order to catch him? No. The address would have to be captured before it hits any router. You're not gonna be able to "trace" the MAC address back to some guy using 802.11 in his house.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    8. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      Intel already thought of this a few years back. Just put a unique ID in every processor and mandate it reports itself to every device on the system.

      Back then, people were up in arms about it. Wanna take a guess how easy it would be to do now?

      --

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    9. Re:how do you trace the cracker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm sorry, I thought you said "cracker"? It's just that I was fairly amused at the thought of a saltine hacking into a remote system...

  55. Sounds interesting...a few thoughts by shaldannon · · Score: 1

    1. Make sure the little-used broom closet is in fact completely unused or some janitor might decide to pawn your colo.
    2. Make sure your linux/*bsd boxen have a way of sensing when they lose link to dhcp, re-link, and then notify your primary dns of the new NAT addresses.
    3. If you're really clever, use one of the boxen as a gateway/firewall, put the others behind it, and then you can have security AND simplify step 2 in one stroke. Oh yes, and you have the pride of saying you have a private subnet behind yet another private subnet.
    Don't forget the power, the UPS, and the monitoring equipment. If you really want to keep tabs, get one of those fancy swivelling x10 cameras to keep a 360 degree view of the surroundings, along with some kind of warning/defense system to protect the equipment against would-be thieves.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
    1. Re:Sounds interesting...a few thoughts by cHiphead · · Score: 0

      Warning/Defense system?

      Like a remotely controlled Aibo with the optional 12 guage shotgun attachment?

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Sounds interesting...a few thoughts by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      The "unused" broom closets at Pearson in Toronto were where the employees went to have sex. There was a big scandal about it a while back. There was a whole underground culture among the employees of the airport. Pretty funny stuff.

  56. SFO? Hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't live in San Francisco. SFO has enough trouble getting freeways, people-movers, and subways built to the airport; I can't imagine that they would be able to handle 802.11 well.

    1. Re:SFO? Hahaha by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 1

      I lived there for a year and a half; long enough to see the construction around the airport, er, well... never ever change. :-) At least not much. I guess I should have put in a <sarcasm> tag.

  57. seen it already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at Calgary airport a few weeks ago

  58. Well.. it's FREE by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    It's free for anyone to use if they have the gear..
    What SHOULD they do for security? Nothing. not their problem.

  59. Legal Questions by mESSDan · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Out of curiosity, what would happen if someone were to go to this airport and pull off some major hack, like gaining access to some .mil computer and downloading lots of top secret documents?

    The anonymity would be a huge reason to go there, free is just a bonus. Tracking the person would be pretty much impossible as the airport probably gets a TON of human traffic everyday (I'm not sure if that airport is an Airline Hub or not). Are there any measures that can(should?) be taken to ensure that the network won't be misused?

    Maybe this will be locked down to port 80 only?

    --

    -- Dan
    1. Re:Legal Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of curiosity, what would happen if someone were to go to this airport and pull off some major hack, like gaining access to some .mil computer and downloading lots of top secret documents?

      The security chief at the military facility would be prosecuted for putting top secret documents on net server, stupid. Top secret documents are not allowed on Internet connections because - tada! - they won't be top secret anymore if they are.

  60. Already exists in Asia by Ryu2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Singapore Changi Airport has offered free wireless Internet access for quite some time now. Hong Kong Airport also offers it, but not free.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  61. Wireless?! What about power??? by Da+VinMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being a resident of the Twin Cities, and an occasional traveler, I find it somewhat amazing that they're offering wireless at all. Not much to say about that.. it could be nice.

    However, it's going to be somewhat worthless to offer your travelers wireless without also giving them a place to plug in your laptop. Yes, I know laptops have batteries and don't have to be plugged in to be used. However, if you're like me, you hoard your battery's power for the actual flight instead of using it in the terminal. It *IS* possible to plug in at the terminal, but outlets are far and few in between, and you have to work around the rechargeable golf carts (or whatever they call those things) and other laptop users.

    Lastly, with all the other concerns they have at airports these days, I am doubly amazed that they have the time to think about this. Not that I mind, it just makes me wonder.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  62. Re:Government Networks by Enry · · Score: 2

    Uhm, it's because of taxpayer money that the Internet was created in the first place. Would you have complained this loudly is the same idea were brought up in...say..1985?

  63. It's not "free" You pay airport taxes when you fly by esses · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the airport fee was just raised for that particular airport.

  64. Business Class Monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I can say is that before they start to use the free net, most of our(my) users would be stumped on step one... no not dhcp etc but how to stick the sodding card in the laptop. .. Certain directors.. hmmm... This guy tried to force an ethernet cable in his modem socket and wondered why the socket snapped off, that will give you some idea of my users.

  65. free wireless Internet service? by pfankus · · Score: 1

    "Here's how much it will cost the airport: $0. The corporate traveler: $0. Joe Traveler: $0, if he has a wireless laptop or handheld; otherwise, $6 to $8 for the day."


    But article is titled "Airport to offer free wireless Internet service"???


    Free like beer? Nope.

  66. Security by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

    The security should not really be an issue if the users known what they are doing (yeah right). Anyone who is using a public wireless network _should_ be handling their own encryption. Most companies these days install a VPN client on the laptops to encrypt all data over the net back to HQ.

    The wireless providers can also put in routing to stop Peer-peer atacks across the same wireless LAN. This is what some of the commercial providers do to stop free use of the wireless connection so people can't just set up a LAN to swap files/etc.

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  67. LAX Has this too... by T3kno · · Score: 1

    Just jump on to one of the CalTrans WAPs ;)

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    1. Re:LAX Has this too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmm going by what i hv seeen at sfo the bawug
      and its cousins are more claims than anything else
      i hv been unable to connect at any of the so called access points at all over downtown sfo.
      will have to wait to see if this is just another
      pr stint or a genuine attempt at bandwith nirvana

  68. Yeah but... by WyldOne · · Score: 1

    The first time there is a group of bored teens with laptops and Q3, there is gonna be an international incedent. While the a massive swat team hides in fear while taunts of "I'm gonna frag you A**" are heard. Would not want to be the mayor of that town.

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  69. Weird by sulli · · Score: 5, Informative
    I was going to post a "RTFA" saying that you will have to pay for it, then I went and RTFA'd, and found that this is a very odd setup. 802.11 connecitivity will be free, but the thing will make money. How you ask? Because iPass, the ISP, will be charging for wired and kiosk access (I guess) and "access to corporate networks" (I think this means managed VPNs).

    I think it's fishy as hell. As 802.11 adoption increases, profits go through the floor. Or they charge for IPSec separately from other protocols, and people develop work-arounds. Meanwhile, JoeHaxor is downloading .isos all day and tying up the service.

    Anyone want to bet on how quickly they stop giving away 802.11 free (or ask the airport for a bailout)? Three months?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Weird by rlowe69 · · Score: 2

      Meanwhile, JoeHaxor is downloading .isos all day and tying up the service.

      C'Mon, how stupid do you take the network admins for? What do you want to bet there is:

      1. A proxy complete with ultra-restrictive firewall (except for special arrangements through business partners).
      2. IP logging and abuse auto-shutdown and/or ban of network card from the service, plus possible triangulation of abusers for security.
      3. Upload and download caps on the service.
      4. Possible blacklisting of sites to discourage people from surfing to porn sites in a public place like an airport.

      Maybe the upload and download caps will be raised on the corportate service, but I don't think there's going to be a way Joe Haxor is going to download an ISO in any amount of time he'd want to spend at an airport - and even then that kind of downloading abuse would get you red-flagged and possibly banned.

      --
      ----- rL
    2. Re:Weird by an_mo · · Score: 1

      The details weren't specifice but to me it looks like a deal between the airport admins and the providers: you provide free wireless and I'll let you use some valuable floor space for kiosks access. As 802.11 increases there will still be plenty of people traveling without their notebooks anxious to check their email. It may be a stable situation.

    3. Re:Weird by Paul68 · · Score: 1
      Anyone want to bet on how quickly they stop giving away 802.11 free (or ask the airport for a bailout)? Three months?

      that is just about enough to enjoy it for the next IETF meeting :-)

  70. AOL To Buy Airports by Daftspaniel · · Score: 2, Funny

    A-irports O-n L-ine * Featuring a 'wide' selection of Time Warner magazines (with blurry JPEG pictures) * Great in flight Movies (TWAol) * AirCrew with Red Hats * AOL keyword: wingandprayer You have delays!

  71. Security, etc. by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1
    From what I can tell so far and what I think would be common sense:
    • They're not going to run any sensitive data or important systems over this wireless network. in fact, it'll be used for nothin other than customers' internet access.
    • For that reason, security is of no concern. If a traveller uses the airport's wireless network, then they are agreeing to whatever terms and conditions there are to its use, which will most likely be that you are not being protected in any way from nasty things, everything you do will be logged (just like any other ISP) and they have the right to sniff whatever they want - after all, you are using their network.
    • On a sidenote to that, the article says all clients will require to comply with Wi-Fi standards... doesn't that incorporate some form of security?
    • Bandwidth - I'd imagine that although the lan party idea sounds good, since they are the 13th largest airport in the world, they will enforce some limits on the amount of bandwidth each connection has, or the service might get frustratingly slow for people using it for its intended purpose.

    For the future...
    I hope that this technology spreads to shopping malls too. Wouldn't it be great to let your girlfriend go off shopping while you sit in a nice relaxing location, next to the fountain or something, surfing slashdot on your PDA?
  72. Security and Price by feldsteins · · Score: 1

    I'm delighted to see anyone providing public access 802.11! There may be some concern over security but in my book if you're concerned about packet sniffing you restrict yourself to the wired LAN and control physical access to the ports. WEP isn't going to solve your problem. It's too easy to crack and it's only going to cut your network performance in half. Just my two cents on WEP.

    I'm doubly delighted that they're not trying to charge the airport visitors for the use of the network. I hope that this is a sign of things to come for other types of places.

    --
    You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
  73. I didn't have anything in mind.... by shaldannon · · Score: 1

    but that certainly sounds good. An R/C tank with mini cannon and stun gun sounds better though :)

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  74. saturated bandwidth; not economically feasible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was at an ACI-NA (Airports Council International-North America) conference in Sept/01 and this was discussed by airport operators--people who were looking into implementing exactly this, but so far, people hadn't been very successful.

    Being able to generate revenue from non-aeronautical streams is very important to an airport, because the aeronautical revenue (passenger charges, landing fees, bridge docking fees, etc.) are regulated. Only by these other operations--duty free, concession contracts, advertising space, selling time on a wireless network, etc.--can airports make money.

    Anyways, so people were looking into it, and it was important.

    As I recall, most operators had decided that it wasn't feasible because:
    1. The relevant frequencies are already saturated with necessary communication. To date, this has been largely uncontrolled, and so airlines have just been using it for their remote check-ins, communication with the loading bridges, operational chatter such as emergency response, etc. So operations people were concerned that a casual browser would cut out important communication.

    2. The cost/benefit analysis didn't seem to make this profitable. In this article, two numbers were quoted: $250,000 capital cost, and revenues of $6-8 per kiosk for a day of surfing (if you have your own wifi card, it's free). Just look at these figures for a minute. Upfront cost of $250,000, and assume operating costs are 50% of what the revenues are (i.e. there's a 100% margin, and we're going to assume that all free surfers don't cost us anything). Then 100 kiosks that generate $8 per day and cost $4 per day meaning a profit of $400 per day. That's $146,000 in yr 1, so there's a break-even in yr 2. That's actually reasonable ... if you figure that you can keep all 100 kiosks running; operating costs are low, no cost overruns on a tech job, the "freeloaders" (techies with their own hifi cards) aren't using the system as much as the paying customers, ... etc.

    Anyways, neat to see that this is being implemented. Glad to hear that there was a work-able business plan. But I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't pan out.

  75. Disaster Management? by Uttles · · Score: 2

    I can see all of the great positives of this new idea, but I'm scared about something: Airports, especially international ones, have their own particular federal laws that aren't always "user friendly." So let's say someone passes through the facial recognition system and their likeness is matched up to that of a suspected terrorist. The whole airport shuts down and all of the sudden federal agents are snagging everyone's laptop that's been on the wireless network to see if they tried to communicate to/about this person. Maybe I'm being too negative or too conspiracy theorist-like, but I just don't think I'd get into the network until I saw how it was treated for a while.

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Disaster Management? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      they certianly have that power.
      you want to know whayt the US is going to be like in 10 years? look at how things are run in an airport.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  76. SPAM Abuse by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can't these be abused by mass UCE mailers?

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  77. Bandwidth? by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

    Who says that this setup will allow high bandwidth transfers? Hell, if my local airport offered free high-speed connections, I would never leave the terminal! An idea is to cap connection speeds at about those of a plain old 56k modem (you remember those, right?). This would allow the network's users ample bandwidth for regular surfing, emailing, instant messanging, IRCing and other basic web activities. Also, this would help curb some of the scenarios mentionned above, such as the warez d00d pulling down ISOs and lagging the network, and the uploading of virii to the network from a curbside check in. (Granted a virus wouldn't take that long to upload anyway, but it's easier to catch someone in the act if he's there a minute rather then a few seconds).

  78. Hope no one gets fried! by masterkool · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/23/132223 8&mode=thread Remember this artictle @slashdot awhile back. I'm willing to bet that al least 10 people try to sue the airports because of something similar to this.

    --
    I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
  79. I'll have to go try this.. :) by Ragnarr · · Score: 1

    I currently am activated out at the airport (doing fire protection, not one of those security monkeys) and I just so happen to have a laptop and an Orinoko :). Next time I get into the 'port I'll let ya'll know what kindof traffic is flowing through there.. This is a great boon for those of us who fly often, and go through MSP, I just wish it was more of a uniform infrastructure throughout the airport communities. ~RaGzz

  80. We need to collaborate these networks by rbgrn · · Score: 1

    I'm looking to collaborate US (for starters) Free 802.11b networks. Basically I'm willing to put up an AP for a node and I'd like it if others who are willing to do this would submit locations so we can start mapping out coverage. I live in chicago so this is my first logical city to work in. I could also use help with design and maintenance of the site. Wouldn't it be sweet if we could walk anywhere with our 802.11b devices and have at least some kind of service, for free? I HAVE A DREAM, DAMNIT!
    http://www.freenets.org

  81. Don't expect it to be free for long... by -tji · · Score: 2

    I would expect it to use some payment system like in many hotels.. You connect, and it blocks any access until you register. Any WWW site you request is replied to with their registration page.

    And, like most other airport goods and services, it won't be cheap.

    1. Re:Don't expect it to be free for long... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      Perhaps they will handle it like they handle smoking.

      Want to get access? It's free. Just go to the bar. Of course, you'll have to buy an $8 drink.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  82. old topic by sckeener · · Score: 1

    It is sad when you can consider yourself a veteran of /. after a few days of posts. Same topic different day

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  83. Great! I can just see it now... by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

    "Dang, missed my flight. Now I've got to wait six hours. I'll be bored what am I going to do?

    [Ding!] "I know! I'll send an email threatening to kill the President over the airport's Wi-Fi!
    Then I can sit back and enjoy the show!

    BTM

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  84. In related news by return+42 · · Score: 2

    A suspected terrorist was apprehended today at Franz Kafka International Airport. Security personnel became suspicious when they noticed the image of a bomb on a traveler's computer screen. The computer case also had a picture of an apple on it, which authorities believe may be related to the September 11 attacks in the "Big Apple".

    Film at 11.

  85. Today's Lunch by LunchLady · · Score: 1

    Today I had Tres Taco's, with chicken inside and hot sauce on top. On the side I had chips and a Barq's Root Beer. It was good, and hearty...thank you.

  86. World wide please. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    I'd say that I would rather like a world wide standard. But maybe that is a job for each airline. Sure it is nice when you step into the biz. lounge of the airline and find a working space with printers/faxes and computers connected to the internet, but if only they would provide a RJ45 connection for the booths where you can sit with your own laptop. Some does but many does not. and all I really need is a cup of coffee and a place to plug my LAN adapter into the net.

    1. Re:World wide please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes the jacks don't even work. Continental's club in terminal D at IAH has one marked "HIGH SPEED INTERNET" right next to a newfangled Cisco VoIP phone. I plugged in, fired up the DHCP client, and ... nothing.

      I only had about 10 minutes to spend there so there was no chance to try other jacks. I plan to return and try more tricks in the future. Maybe they'll have some 802.11b action happening too.

  87. not only that but great for spammers by xeeno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just imagine. A free, open wireless network in which you can churn out spam by the crate.

  88. A DDoS waiting to happen by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

    2. Denial of Service attacks from a single user are history. ...While it may be difficult to track you down to an exact location, you are still in a post 9/11/01 airport. They are on the lookout for strange behavior.

    You're missing the big picture. Said DDoS hacker has his laptop in his bag, with a nice high-gain antenna so he gets more range. It automatically connects to the network, then begins scanning all connected machines for vulnerabilites. If it finds one, it dumps the trojan/DDoS client on it- he doesn't care about launching an attack there and then- the important thing is to hack the laptops. Once they're hacked, the software will automatically call home to the IRC channel to await commands. Of course, it'd be smart for the trojan to wait a few hours before trying to connect so the airport wirless doesn't lock onto the IRC traffic and notify the user.

    Said DDoS hacker stands at the magazine rack for a while. Then heads to the food court. Maybe stare out the window at the planes, things everyone else is doing, while his laptop is busy finding insecurities. After a while, he moves on to the next terminal. How many machines do you think he can hack in a short time? How many could a small group in a short time? A concentrated effort by a large group at major airports across the country?

    Pretty scary if you ask me.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:A DDoS waiting to happen by MentlFlos · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How is this different from the same hacker sitting in his basement wearing nothing but stained underwear and doing it from his home box?

      The only argument is that he is more anonymous at the airport but I think he has less of a chance getting caught/in trouble from home. Have you ever tried to go after a person who port scanned you? You can spam abuse@hisisp all you want, they don't do crap. I know because I manage a lab at a college and I've tried to get peoples accounts pulled for trying to break into my systems. If you want the law involved its even worse because you need to prove >$5000 of damage was caused and all that crap.

      With the paranoia around airports now a days I don't even want to bring my laptop with me. The less crap I have on me the less I have to worrry about.

      Or I could just be blowing steam out of my ass... oh well.

    2. Re:A DDoS waiting to happen by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

      Sure. But not every script kiddie lives in range of a major wireless hub. AFAIK, most large wireless hubs would be used in corporate areas of town. Yes, they could hack those machines, and maybe hack quite large number of machines. But those machines are generally stationary- to stop a DDoS the ISP simply needs to pull the plug on the building's connection.

      From the airport, he hits laptops heading different directions around the world. A true DDoS. Once the laptop is plugged back in a the owner's office, the hacker also has an opening into that company's network. That's was my point.

      As for security, well, I think it's probably overrated, and they're more concerned with other issues.

      Well, I guess that's enough on this topic, I don't want to give the kiddies too many ideas.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  89. A couple thoughts by geekoid · · Score: 2

    This is from an American, so it invloves an US perspective and experiences:
    Security: In an airport you are always being watched. Its been this way for years. If you log into the netowork, you can bet they'll find you if they want to. Its a matter of determining when the event took place and which wireless "hub" was the originator, then searching through the video files. They get everybodies picture with a laptop, then profile them. Once they have someone they feel best fits the profile, they will get every recording of you, i everyplace you've been on there property. thids means they know what Bus, car, cab, plane, you got there with. This is just basic security work from that point.

    Terrorist: this in no way makes airplane more vulnerable to attack. Of course the current security measures in know way prevent the events from 9/11 happening again either.(of course if you pull a knife out now, the other passengers will probably kill you. THAT will prevent another 9/11.

    Don't send any data in a public network that you wouldn't post on the front page of a newspaper, ever. If you do, it will be found out. I wish we lived in a world where you could send data and not worry about it, but alas, we do not.

    Finally, If you want to know what life will be like in the US 10 years from now, just look at an airport and expect to have the same level of privacy.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  90. Frankfurt am Main Airport Germany by O0o0Oblubb!O0o0O · · Score: 1

    If I'm not mistaken, one of Germany's largest international airports, Frankfurt am Main Airport also offers wireless services. It's been some time since I read about it. It was supposed to be free only during a test phase though. After that, you'd have to pay a certain fee. Still helps to shorten the waiting time for a plane :).

  91. the FBI is behind this by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

    great place to put a Carnivore... right at the firewall that (hopefully) protects this thing from the outside world.

  92. Just unplug that vending machine.... by 2Bits · · Score: 2
    and plug in your laptop.

    1. Re:Just unplug that vending machine.... by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      Hehe, reminds me of my holigan childhood, unplug a couple of vending machines at station or whereever, come back a few hours later after countless people have put their $1.50 in (and not recieved the coke), plug it back in, and bang all those coins come out! :)

  93. Sydney Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK, Sydney Airport is doing something similar. I've seen a few 802.11b antennas sticking out of the roof, and they've had free wireless internet kiosks (sponsored by samsung) since the olympics.

  94. oh well by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2
    One day, all you'll need for full Internet access is a handheld computer. It will be equipped with all the "short range" communications technologies, as well as digital wireless connectivity through cellular phone and satellite systems. The device will automatically pick the cheapest (or free) communication protocol to use, with the lowest power requirements, and will automatically switch between protocols when necessary. This will all occur seamlessly. In effect, you'll have connectivity no matter where you are.

    Until then, oh well.

  95. Buy another battery by PW2 · · Score: 1

    or two...

  96. Ready to go by laertes · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When I was traveling through MSP this December, I fired up my Mac to set up a Airport network with my brother's Mac, peer-to-peer style. I happened to notice the Airport's network ID in the Airport menu, and selected it. Everything worked automatically through DHCP, except, I didn't get a router address. So, not having any packet sniffers, I gave up on that idea.

    Anyway, I'm sorry that last paragraph was so confusing. I guess assigning another meaning to the word Airport wasn't so smart on Apple's part.

    --

    Yes, I'm still a junky. Are you still a bitch?
    1. Re:Ready to go by stripes · · Score: 2
      When I was traveling through MSP this December, I fired up my Mac to set up a Airport network with my brother's Mac, peer-to-peer style. I happened to notice the Airport's network ID in the Airport menu, and selected it. Everything worked automatically through DHCP, except, I didn't get a router address. So, not having any packet sniffers, I gave up on that idea.

      FYI, if you are running OSX you do have a sniffer. Open the terminal and try "tcpdump -X -s 1600 -vv -i en1"...

  97. Re:Government Roads by jonr · · Score: 1

    Do we really want our governments putting up big higway projects? I know that's not what I pay my taxes for.
    You don't have to be a genius to see that there are more important things to do with taxpayer money.
    What does this even get us really? Sure it's k3w1 and convenient and whatnot, but seriously.
    If we let this sort of thing happen, why not Government off-ramps or mountain roads service?

    See the sarcasm? :)

  98. How the hell did this get modded up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's in charge of the moderation here, undersexed compulsive bonobo monkeys? The parent post should've been sent -1, Offtopic immediately. So much for the idea "there's no such thing as a free lunch"...

  99. If I can get free internet at the airport... by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    I may start travelling more. I'll go to airports with a load of bills, play on the internet while I wait for a plane that needs a passenger and does that cheap passanger at the last minute thing.

    Then I'll visit around the country just for the heck of it... Coming back to the airport daily to catch up on emails and buisness so I can have money to keep traveling.

  100. Something to do, at least by idiotnot · · Score: 1

    ...while they de-ice your plane for the fifth time. And just think, you could plan your layovers around it.

    4 hours in Minneapolis.....high speed access....I can grab copies of....

    Inevitably, it'll just mean a reduction in Playboy/Penthouse/Hustler sales for the airport newstands.

  101. pr0n? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    Are the airports going to be utilizing the same blacklists of url's that the Australian government uses?

    I know if I had a kid, and he/she was sitting next to some 40 yr old skeeze looking at kiddie pr0n, I would be livid!

  102. Re:Wireless?! What about power??? by furiousgeorge · · Score: 2

    >>>Being a resident of the Twin Cities....

    >>However, it's going to be somewhat worthless to
    >>offer your travelers wireless without also
    >>giving them a place to plug in your laptop.

    Ummmmmm........ you should fly out of your own airport more. Minneapolis/StPaul is actually pretty good at having desks available in the terminal WITH power outlets.

    Sure, it could always be better, but it's about the best airport i've seen in that regard.

  103. ONLY $250K? by jaysones · · Score: 1

    No wonder /. has such good bandwidth. Are they spending ONLY $250,000 for hosting?

  104. Re:Wireless?! What about power??? by keykitman · · Score: 1

    O'Hare is the worst airport for power
    outlets, that I've seen. I couldn't find
    a single outlet when I went through over
    the holidays, just a couple of non-working ones.
    Rather amazing and depressing, considering that
    it's a fairly new terminal.

    ...Tim...

  105. the last place i want 802.11b by dlasley · · Score: 1

    i can watch cnn.com, read one of several (insert city here) times/daily/post newspapers, and listen to npr at most airports. why would i want to expose my laptop to airsnort (unless they are giving everyone their own WEP key or cert - heh) just to read slashdot and find out that the whole thing's been cancelled for lack of ROI just as my link gets cut???

    i think it would be more useful to have kioks like gatwick where you can jack into a pvt space and fire up your favorite PPTP client. a small service fee to hook up and you're on your way to reading about what's really important, like the TCP/IP enabled lego brick ...

    --
    when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
  106. Script Kiddies? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    A lot of people are worried about script kiddies.

    Last I checked, most of these folks were 15 years old. Chances are the only time they will be in an aiport is when they fly back to New Jersey to visit grandma. Mom and Dad won't let them take there expensive laptops with them because they know it will break.

    Chances are the'll be too busy looking at the assult rifles the national guard is carrying and wondering what a death match in the airport would be like.

    --

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  107. Why not Indianapolis International? by gewalkeriq · · Score: 1

    Sure, Indy was a possibility, but they were afraid users might play violent video games in a public place.

    I'm an Indy resident, and I know the video game ordinance was stupid. But it was a fairly major campaign promise for the new mayor. Logic or Politics, apparently you can't have both.

    Sounds likes Minnesota beats Indy on the high-tech frontier (like everybody else).

  108. Security education opportunity by epeus · · Score: 2

    Set up a public terminal that is running EtherPEG, and pretty soon people will get the message about untrusted public networks...

  109. Re:Great! I can just see it now... by alecto · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This dangerous (and, I know, hypothetical) scenario assumes:

    1. You paid for your network card in cash, at a store with no security cameras, and didn't use it anywhere else, ever. (Or you changed the MAC address in the driver or with ifconfig. And you're sure it didn't send a packet with your real MAC over the air before it was changed.)

    2. You didn't send or receive any other traffic that could identify you, either outright or through correlation with browsing habits that could be trivially mapped to you (hmm . . . that MAC address also connected to slashdot.org; let's see what other people in the area have accounts there--Smith, you get the subpoena).

    3. No one (and no cameras) observed someone fitting your description acting "suspiciously" at the airport with a laptop. (There was this guy with this sh*t eating grin with a computer. Why, officer? Is there a terrorist loose?)

    4. Your real name isn't on a passenger manifest for an aircraft arriving or departing that could place you in the airport around that time.

    5. There is nothing in your email headers inadvertently identifying you (NETBIOS name? You'd be amazed at what gets stuffed into email headers by some programs.

    6. You covered all the things not this easily imagined that could get you nailed.

    I know you're kidding, but the Secret Service does not screw around with threats to the President (rightfully so), and the government has effectively infinite investigative resources.
  110. Dangeous honesty by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Too true. But what's really disturbing is this: you've just admitted to committing a crime. Yes, you did nothing malicious with the information you gathered (at least I'm assuming you didn't), but just the fact of gathering it is "electronic trespass". Absurd? Of course. But our current political culture sells "locking up the criminals" as a solution to everything.

    BTW, what sniffing software do you prefer?

  111. Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrorists will use this to coordinate attacks. It is also probably that it will open the airport network itself up to attack.

  112. Re:Wireless?! What about power??? by Xerithane · · Score: 2

    Most flights I've been on (American/United) have a standard cigarette-lighter style power adapter in the seats.

    I'm curious if you can setup an 802.11 network in flight or if it will muck with anything they run. I think another thing that would take off well for the planes is having a game/lan server and either cat5 or 802.11. Being able to play Counter Strike/Quake3/Starcraft on the flight would be awesome. I'd pay extra for that capability, assuming you knew other people on the plane could play :)

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  113. Re:Make Money Fast at the Airport by turtleshadow · · Score: 1

    Send me $50 and I will get you into a great opportunity selling viagra by e-mail while your waiting at the airport.

    Seriously --- given 10 min of code any decent spammer can whip out a program that will SPAN X accounts Y per minute. If they are stuck at the airport while trying to visit their gorgeous beach front property we are much the worse.

    Sounds to me is a whole bunch of unstoppable SPAM waiting to happen. Even more theft of service.....

    Regards,
    Turtleshadow

  114. empowering the traveler by gkbarr · · Score: 1
    Actually, next time you're in an airport and your flight in canceled remember that you could be online looking for the next flight out of there on ANY airline...

    And the best part is, they (co. that canceled said flight) has to buy you the ticket!

    Know your rights

    --
    Sapere Aude - Homer
  115. Re:Wireless?! What about power??? by LegendLength · · Score: 1

    The person in front you of may get a little annoyed as you slam your mouse around on the tray table, however.

  116. Re:Wireless?! What about power??? by lelitsch · · Score: 1

    Which terminal? I fly through there every couple of weeks and there are enough of them. Either in the floor under the seats (which such by the way) next to the gates or running along the lower part of the window frames. There's also a very convenient one next to the Starbucks tables between the H and G concourses.

  117. San Jose and Seattle airports have this by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

    And I think Dallas did too.

    San Fran, Chicago, didn't have it.

    Of course, it was free to Windows XP users only (by TravelPort.Net).

    The next best thing to do is to stand outside all the admirals clubs and try to steal some signal.

  118. Network Security, How About Airport Security? by internic · · Score: 1

    Even better than cell phones, a new way your friendly neighborhood terrorist can collect and relay real-time, first person, intelligence on security setup, procedured, and deployment. I mean, if you can afford something powerfull enough to run something with SSL, SSH, PGP, or a VPN client, then you even have an encrypted channel. This seems to be another indication, in my opinion, that all of this stuff about airport security is just for show. I wish they would take it more seriously.

    --
    "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
  119. Re:Government Networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I checked, COncourse Communications (the company installing the network) is a commercial entity owned by a couple of publicly traded companies, NOT a "government". Airports typically have a governing body which is sometimes, but not always, part of the county or state government. In MSP, it's the Metropolitan Airports Commission. They make their money from landing fees, concessions, and parking mostly, along with stuff like vending and payphones. This is a similar deal - Concourse foots the bill for the equipment & installation, and the MAC provides an affluent and captive customer base, and is compensated by Concourse.
    BTW, this is NOT part of the airline wireless LANs, or other commercial wireless LANs operating at the airport.

  120. Not Such A New Idea by robmered · · Score: 1

    Changi Airport (Singapore) has had free wireless (for laptops) and IR (PDA) internet access (as described here) for some time now. Great for that 2 hour stopover en route to Europe...

  121. already available in some airports by sokoban · · Score: 1

    I know that Bluegrass International has a network that is available, as does the Airport in Hilo, Hawaii. A few others have this too.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  122. Oops. by Snover · · Score: 1

    "During take off, you must return your seat and tray table to their full and upright position and turn off all electronic devices, and keep all electronic devices such as radios and portable televisions turned off for the duration of the flight."

    *runs Flight Simulator, takes control of plane, flies into the ground (oops)*

    You ever wonder how crackable the autopilot on a commercial airplane is? It probably uses the same frequencies (or frequencies scannable by) a wireless ethernet card, or will in the coming years (what with the FCC cracking down on radio bandwidth usage). This open availability of access to various sources can only compound the issue of security.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  123. Ok.. by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    I evidently do not fly enough as I had not scrounged around enough to find all of this.

    What desks? Argh!

    BTW - I've only ever attempted to use my laptop in the airport while I'm at the gate. I suppose that was my most critical error.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    1. Re:Ok.. by MarkMac · · Score: 1
      I've never come across them either at MSP - heck, before Sept 11 it was difficult enough just to find ANY place to sit down with a PC much less a table with a working outlet! (I bet there are outlets in the frequent flyer lounges for Northwest and United). But then again the MSP airport has been under re-construction for quite some time and maybe this is one of the new amenities along with the people movers! Hopefully the wireless reception with work near Caribou Coffee - and isn't Starbucks supposed to be sponsoring wireless service in its outlets :-) (An airport caffeine tax might help pay for the "free" wireless setup ...). Or you could just go over to the newly remodeled Humphrey Terminal (home of the now defunct Sun Country airlines) as I'm sure you'd find an unused outlet or two there (but no wireless :-(

      Someone made an interesting point about being able to use the electrical outlets on the planes - where would you get the appropriate power cable though?

  124. nice.. or not.. well... maybe by gh0ul · · Score: 1

    Wireless in airports would be nice to kill time between those overlays.

  125. Re:Wireless?! What about power??? by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 2

    I fly in and out of MSP a lot. On my most recent visit to the airport, they had an area with carrels set up so that you could sit down, plug in your laptop and work. The carrels were even equipped with payphones that had little jacks in the side so you could plug your laptop modem into it and dial into your ISP. It looked new -- at least I hadn't noticed it in previous visits.

    But yeah, electrical outlets are generally few and far between in airports.

    Steve

  126. Singapore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Singapore has free internet access via wifi already for a couple of years..

    1. Re:Singapore by warez_d00d · · Score: 1

      obscure testing. don't read, don't mod...

      Hi! blah blah [microsoft.com]

      booya.

  127. Re:Wireless?! What about power??? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

    counterstrike on the airplane might upset your fellow passengers just a tad. All the hoopla with terrorists and all...

  128. Re:Registration page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, a registration page... With a MAC address, cell phone number, home address...

    How about I turn on my sniffer, capture a MAC, then modify one byte so it's *unique* and spoof my MAC?

    Are you going to actually reverse lookup the Cell phone # to match it to the address? I can guarantee you that won't work. Here's why:

    * bogus addresses (1060 W. Addison, Chicago, IL 60606)

    * Bogus cell phone # 1-312-222-2222 (Chicago Tribune classified ad line)

    * People may use a diff address than what the cell phone points to...

    Want some more info that I can make up?

    About the only *good* thing related to the registration check-in page is that one would be able to sniff the REAL info of the sheeple and commit some really nice fraudlent activities...

    Keep goin' - you're definately on the right track

  129. Good business people use IPSec... by Nijika · · Score: 2

    everybody else uses Hotmail.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  130. Power in Airports by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    I remember taking a few flights through National Airport, back in the Metricom days. [Richochet, or however they spelled it]. It does sometimes take a little bit of time in finding power outlets, and in making sure you're near them, but if you have a good eye, you'll find them.

    [Simple fact is -- they use 'em for vaccuum cleaners. Some airports have 'em in the floor, with some sort of locking panel over 'em...as we can't carry pocket pliers or pocket knives on us anymore, we can't open those up, but quite a few airports have 'em just as normal circuits along the wall, under some seats.]

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  131. Homeland Security? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
    Ok, so what happened to the country's paranoia about nasty terrorists?

    Now all they have to do is sit at the airport with their trusty wireless laptop and sniff corporate IDs and passwords to their heart's content. At least the company I work for only allows wireless access through a VPN!

    This is just beautiful.

  132. Are you sure? by sulli · · Score: 1
    Sniffing data going over the airwaves is, with very few exceptions (notably cellphone frequencies), legal. I don't think there's any law prohibiting promiscuous-mode 802.11 cards - and it's not like he's plugging into a physical LAN owned by someone else.

    And anyway - it was the IETF for heaven's sake! These are people who design and analyze this stuff for a living. If they can't do simple stuff like a secure login (fuck, even Yahoo Mail lets you do that) then we're really in trouble.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Are you sure? by fm6 · · Score: 2
      Well, I'm not a lawyer. But all sllort really needs to have a problem is some fed somewhere who thinks he broke the law.
      ...then we're really in trouble.
      That goes without saying!
  133. Calling out the National Guard by nvts-NUTS · · Score: 1

    I can see the CNN headlines now...

    "President Bush calls out the National Guard to provide airport network security after alleged hack attempt from Dullas International.

    Today, Mr. Bush citing the need to protect business travelers from hackers in airports called out the National Guard to aid in the inspection of network packets in airport terminals. Later today he'll be proposing a 55 billion dollar budget amendment to increase network security in airports.

    Mr. Bush said at his press conference "We just need to spend more money to provide security for these Americans. The US economy is depending on it."

  134. Re:Wireless?! What about power??? by Eil · · Score: 2


    As others in this thread noted, I've been to MSP a few times... last time with a 3 hour layover. Just so happened that right next to my gate there was one of these little room-type things with... well I guess you could call them desks. In the same room were drop boxes for mailing, making faxes, etc. It was quite cool. No net access (at the time), though...

  135. You definitely need to spell explicitly with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an extra i instead of an extra e.

    Just like the i but no a in definitely.