There are even Nazi websites and a Nazi party in the US, and the government does nothing about it! That way there is only the citizenry's common sense to prevent the Nazi to grab power there!
Why do no politician even think that a backdoor may be used by a terrorist or a paedophile? A paedophile may take advantage of any vulnerability on an underage person's connected device, and those politicians want to ensure there be at least one? The same can be said about a terrorist getting info about British nationals which may pose threats their security and to the country's as well. Criminals use backdoors too.
At the same time, the close vote — 285 to 281 — suggested the extent to which some European lawmakers are wary of alienating the United States.
Or, maybe European politicians are just sharply divided over the issue. That would be easy to believe, even if it doesn't fit the narrative of the poor little EU always cowering whenever the US clears its throat.
Perhaps they are considering that supporting Snowden will encourage whistle-blowing in their own countries, while those who voted not to prosecute Snowden are just for the photo ops, counting on the ineffectiveness of the resolution.
I tried using OpenSolaris and OpenIndiana at home, but it seemed it was not the intended use. Can anyone explain what do people and business do with Solaris?
It's worse, when you first use Whatsapp it's offered free for a year, after which you have to pay a modicum yearly to keep using the service, yet I've never heard of anyone paying to use it, and you are still the product being sold.
Because in Brazil, a each SMS message (about 150B) costs about US$ 0,13, but for about US$ 0,20 money you can use 50MB of data for a day. People uses Whatsapp here because it's cheaper.
If you're wondering how Matt Damon eats or breathes, and other science facts.
LALALALA
You should remind yourself it's just a show I should really just relax.
That is not just a show. Too many people want to watch that movie because it's almost scientifically accurate, well, accurate enough that one can make a point in discussing any minor mistake.
You're thinking of Battlefield Earth. After Earth is that horrid movie Will Smith bought as a vehicle for his son which, AFAIK, has nothing to do with Scientology.
For being remembered, just static images and plain text would be enough, but too many advertisements online have scripts, links and other things that make them treacherous.
(By the way, I talk about links because of that one time I saw an ad that pointed to ashleyrnadison.com in a portal that is quite popular in my country, and that offered no means to report malicious ads.)
I wonder if the film critics had some kind of beef with the cast or crew and took it out on them in the reviews, as there are plenty of similarly poor 'Sci-Fi' genre films scoring in the 40-55% range, which seems more reasonable, but I would have expected at least better than 30%.
This gives me an idea: they could set up to serve the tits & ass as advertisement. That way, I could glance at the site without worrying about violating my employer's code of conduct on the web.
Every time I see the words "Google Cardboard", I think of a cell phone mounted on a cardboard, that people can wear on their heads. I can't help thinking of something made of actual cardboard, whereas English is not even my first language!
Slashdot Mirror
There are even Nazi websites and a Nazi party in the US, and the government does nothing about it!
That way there is only the citizenry's common sense to prevent the Nazi to grab power there!
Whilst protecting their own what? Their own people?
Last time there was some political action against an actual threat, it was from the Mothers of America.
At least people in Britain feel confident enough not to fear being harassed for pointing a camera to a police officer.
Why do no politician even think that a backdoor may be used by a terrorist or a paedophile? A paedophile may take advantage of any vulnerability on an underage person's connected device, and those politicians want to ensure there be at least one? The same can be said about a terrorist getting info about British nationals which may pose threats their security and to the country's as well. Criminals use backdoors too.
At the same time, the close vote — 285 to 281 — suggested the extent to which some European lawmakers are wary of alienating the United States.
Or, maybe European politicians are just sharply divided over the issue. That would be easy to believe, even if it doesn't fit the narrative of the poor little EU always cowering whenever the US clears its throat.
Perhaps they are considering that supporting Snowden will encourage whistle-blowing in their own countries, while those who voted not to prosecute Snowden are just for the photo ops, counting on the ineffectiveness of the resolution.
It is not an error-state, it is Siri's new job as an Apple sales person rather than an information service.
Coming up: "Siri, what is the time?", "Sorry, I can't tell you that because you don't have an Apple watch"
Siri has been an Apple salesrobot since it was bought by them.
Why do you have such kind of weapons?
As I have nothing to contribute to this dicussion, here is a link to a funny video: Donovan Duck.
I tried using OpenSolaris and OpenIndiana at home, but it seemed it was not the intended use. Can anyone explain what do people and business do with Solaris?
You need someone's phone number to send them Whatsapp messages.
It's worse, when you first use Whatsapp it's offered free for a year, after which you have to pay a modicum yearly to keep using the service, yet I've never heard of anyone paying to use it, and you are still the product being sold.
Because in Brazil, a each SMS message (about 150B) costs about US$ 0,13, but for about US$ 0,20 money you can use 50MB of data for a day. People uses Whatsapp here because it's cheaper.
If you're wondering how Matt Damon eats or breathes, and other science facts. LALALALA
You should remind yourself it's just a show I should really just relax.
That is not just a show. Too many people want to watch that movie because it's almost scientifically accurate, well, accurate enough that one can make a point in discussing any minor mistake.
The one child policy proves you wrong.
You're thinking of Battlefield Earth. After Earth is that horrid movie Will Smith bought as a vehicle for his son which, AFAIK, has nothing to do with Scientology.
No, I am not confounding them. And as far as I care to know, After Earth has something to do with Scientology: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_Earth#Scientology_themes
Amazon is a company that instead of focusing in making profit, is intent on pushing off all of its competitors. Amazon is evil.
For being remembered, just static images and plain text would be enough, but too many advertisements online have scripts, links and other things that make them treacherous.
(By the way, I talk about links because of that one time I saw an ad that pointed to ashleyrnadison.com in a portal that is quite popular in my country, and that offered no means to report malicious ads.)
I wonder if the film critics had some kind of beef with the cast or crew and took it out on them in the reviews, as there are plenty of similarly poor 'Sci-Fi' genre films scoring in the 40-55% range, which seems more reasonable, but I would have expected at least better than 30%.
More likely they had a beef with Scientology.
The must be trying the clickbait generator.
This gives me an idea: they could set up to serve the tits & ass as advertisement. That way, I could glance at the site without worrying about violating my employer's code of conduct on the web.
Every time I see the words "Google Cardboard", I think of a cell phone mounted on a cardboard, that people can wear on their heads. I can't help thinking of something made of actual cardboard, whereas English is not even my first language!
You misread that.
It's the year of ARM on laptop!
Thanks for fixing that for me!
People in Slashdot think this treaty is evil because they don't know what is in it.
Yey! Lots of sex for China!