Has Rasberry Pi upped their game in terms of sound quality yet? Also can you play HECV on a raspberry pi? These are the things that are keeping me from making one into an entertainment center.
Obviously this man does not type for a living. Taking my hands off the keyboard is a bad thing and slows me down; this happens a lot less when I use a mouse. Also the mouse allows the most precision for selecting text in my experience.
If that were truly the case, then the financials wouldn't work for getting the machines in the first place; they might as well have kept the person and saved money. In most cases, automation is used because it takes 1/50th the people to maintain it than were there in the first place.
these industries can't find enough qualified people because they realize their bodies are worn out half way though their working years. I know many tradesmen with bad knees and backs especially.
If, by what you mean as reaction time, is the time to make a decision to react using on board sensors and processing, I am not disputing that a computer will be faster no contest. However, if you actually read what I wrote, I am concerned about the time it must take the car to make a decision. Is Google even close to recognizing a *still picture* of a duck from a dog from a cat from a beaver using their entire datacenter within the time the car will need? how does this datacenter get fit on board to the car so that this decision can be made in real time? Keep in mind that there are thousands of samples a second; so it will need to search through it's entire database of 'world objects' at least one thousand times a second, on board, in a car. Good luck. Just try not to hit or kill anything please.
Because we accept 16 as the age of driving because in our experience most 16 year olds understand all they need and are capable of driving. What I'm telling you is that there is no algorithm that can run on the car (because any wireless connection would be too slow) and identify that animal within the 0.001 seconds it needs to in order to make the correct decision.
The inherent social logic flaw is that we have made our surroundings more intelligent than our bodies. I get cravings for (too much) high fat food because my body thinks calories are scarce. I still appreciate the comfort of a real fire. People are dumbasses when it comes to technology and they don't know what they have done.
The best music has rich sounds, whether it is a synthesized sound or a 200 year old violin. Listening to most any kind of music is better if you can hear it with the highest fidelity possible.
I am not an audiophile because I don't always buy the best equipment, but I don't like to introduce unnecessary bottlenecks to the quality either. Bluetooth music just doesn't sound as interesting to my ear. It's lacking character in the bass or something.
Well i just copied something off the internet and didn't read it and I'm pretty sure I'm in the company of thousands of developers. They passed it without assessing whether it's valid. so this is the fine quality the apple rules are getting you. All they do is give you the appearance you are protected with no substance.
Has Rasberry Pi upped their game in terms of sound quality yet? Also can you play HECV on a raspberry pi? These are the things that are keeping me from making one into an entertainment center.
Don't they put horse hair in some food to act as a filler?
Let's just say, the people I knew who were drywallers really should not be electricians.
Define trades... granted, there are easier trades than a drywaller but not everyone can do them.
Obviously this man does not type for a living. Taking my hands off the keyboard is a bad thing and slows me down; this happens a lot less when I use a mouse. Also the mouse allows the most precision for selecting text in my experience.
Which they can't do either.
If that were truly the case, then the financials wouldn't work for getting the machines in the first place; they might as well have kept the person and saved money. In most cases, automation is used because it takes 1/50th the people to maintain it than were there in the first place.
Sure that's no problem, because every plumber gets paid like a sports pro early in their career.
these industries can't find enough qualified people because they realize their bodies are worn out half way though their working years. I know many tradesmen with bad knees and backs especially.
If, by what you mean as reaction time, is the time to make a decision to react using on board sensors and processing, I am not disputing that a computer will be faster no contest. However, if you actually read what I wrote, I am concerned about the time it must take the car to make a decision. Is Google even close to recognizing a *still picture* of a duck from a dog from a cat from a beaver using their entire datacenter within the time the car will need? how does this datacenter get fit on board to the car so that this decision can be made in real time? Keep in mind that there are thousands of samples a second; so it will need to search through it's entire database of 'world objects' at least one thousand times a second, on board, in a car. Good luck. Just try not to hit or kill anything please.
Because we accept 16 as the age of driving because in our experience most 16 year olds understand all they need and are capable of driving. What I'm telling you is that there is no algorithm that can run on the car (because any wireless connection would be too slow) and identify that animal within the 0.001 seconds it needs to in order to make the correct decision.
Apparently after they wash the Waymo cars they have to get on top and wipe off every ... single ... drop so that it will work reliably.
Driving (anywhere on the surface of the Earth) cannot be defined with a reasonably finite set of rules, period.
Are you sure you want to do that? Then they'll really know you are up to something.
The inherent social logic flaw is that we have made our surroundings more intelligent than our bodies. I get cravings for (too much) high fat food because my body thinks calories are scarce. I still appreciate the comfort of a real fire. People are dumbasses when it comes to technology and they don't know what they have done.
The best music has rich sounds, whether it is a synthesized sound or a 200 year old violin. Listening to most any kind of music is better if you can hear it with the highest fidelity possible.
It's not really punishing the corporation unless it affects stock prices.
I listen to a lot of electronic myself. No singers, and they very much care about the quality of the sources if that is what they are using.
I am not an audiophile because I don't always buy the best equipment, but I don't like to introduce unnecessary bottlenecks to the quality either. Bluetooth music just doesn't sound as interesting to my ear. It's lacking character in the bass or something.
It makes a difference in the feeling of the bass too, so don't count out even deaf people.
I always used FLAC and wired headphones, so I guess I'm not in for a treat.
Well i just copied something off the internet and didn't read it and I'm pretty sure I'm in the company of thousands of developers. They passed it without assessing whether it's valid. so this is the fine quality the apple rules are getting you. All they do is give you the appearance you are protected with no substance.
How do you fine someone for throwing society in the toilet for their own benefit?
If you read the privacy statement on every app you install, then wow obviously you are a precious snowflake indeed.
That has nothing to do with my point.