I guess I just don't see the point in a "real" 3D camera when I can't view it's pictures on anything more than a 2D screen. Give me a "real" 3D screen to go with this and I might be impressed.
Before you get upset at the wrong people....
ISP are expanding the number of users AND the size of the pipe. This IS happening. The wall you speak of is only theoretical. Bandwidth is NOT as limited as you think. If it were, ISP's would not be capable of doing what they do. One of the problems here is that speedtests are the only places that users can actually see numbers that even come close to advertised "paid for" service. If I pay for 30megs down...I want 30megs down (regardless of what that 30megs consist of).
lol...With an ever increasing portion of people not being taught to see reality (only what feels, sounds, or looks good)...we see our fearless leaders growing more and more out of touch with the very people they are intended to lead...I see this and comment on it and I'm off topic? This article would not even exist of it were not for government being so off topic. It does not matter which side of the isle your on, none of them care about anything but themselves and the power they can cultivate over the masses.
"These guys are commiting crimes under some bogus rubric of protecting the country." The same thing happens with environmentalism, only on a larger scale.
That's interesting....
The education system seems to be teaching children that 2+2=5 if they "feel" it does (could be 6 if they "feel" that too). Is this a possible method of torture directed towards children?
Most people will never be able to tell the difference in quality between this and the typical mp3. For the average person, the only difference is that it would be downloaded from a different server. It seems to me to be easier to mandate advertising in all P2P software. But then, no one would use it for fear of adware/spyware. From what I read here, it's all about "advertising" which has NOTHING to do with downloading anything. The question i have is...How is this any more legal than using bearshare? LMFAO! Nothing changes. The downloader still pays nothing. What's the point in all of this? Unless using this gets your computer infected.
Why so much attention for a questionable road when that road only takes a small portion of the money that is allocated? What about the rest of the money? how about focusing on the larger picture?
...between downloading from a P2P network and downloading from something considered more legit (like Itunes) when it's presented as DRM free? At it's very best, all it amounts to is downloading the exact same thing from a different server...especially when it's downloaded for free. All 'legit' services do give 'free' DRM free downloads. It has been said by the RIAA that "downloading is illegal and immoral". Yet, downloading from Itunes is never questioned. Why is it that when someone downloads from P2P, they are "freeloaders" but when it's a DRM free 'free' download...everything is ok? One aspect of this that does bother me is that you cannot pull up ANYTHING from the web that is NOT downloaded (in some way). The entire internet is based on the concept of "copying" things, from one computer to another. In all the arguments surrounding this issue, I have yet to hear any logical reason that justifies the actions of the recording industry on any real technical level.
Is this kinda of idiocy what we are to expect from a so-called tech savy Obama? People are not going to be ready in four months just like they are not ready now. If we are going to do this...THEN LET'S JUST DO IT.
It is interesting how everyone now says to stop using IE6. IE6 was never all that good to start with. Before I had to except IE6, I never went about IE5.5. Now that I have to have it, I use firefox. IE6 has always been crap.
Which way are you going? Are you saying you do or don't need trucks? I would like to know something though...how does one keep from supporting "foreign oil" while driving any gas powered vehicle?
Slashdot Mirror
I guess I just don't see the point in a "real" 3D camera when I can't view it's pictures on anything more than a 2D screen. Give me a "real" 3D screen to go with this and I might be impressed.
Forgive me please....but I don't understand a single thing you just said.
I saw nothing in the article or any of the linked articles that specifically refers to IE or Firefox or anything else....
Now, this is the best example of something to call "organic" in a positive way.
What this article is saying...I would get ignored for saying...and it IS something I would say.
Bill Clinton was supposed to make "hacking" a federal offense.
Before you get upset at the wrong people.... ISP are expanding the number of users AND the size of the pipe. This IS happening. The wall you speak of is only theoretical. Bandwidth is NOT as limited as you think. If it were, ISP's would not be capable of doing what they do. One of the problems here is that speedtests are the only places that users can actually see numbers that even come close to advertised "paid for" service. If I pay for 30megs down...I want 30megs down (regardless of what that 30megs consist of).
How likely would Leo Laporte be to accept such a position under Obama?
From the way the article reads...I guess only a Silicon Valley name can be a "tech guy"???
lol...With an ever increasing portion of people not being taught to see reality (only what feels, sounds, or looks good)...we see our fearless leaders growing more and more out of touch with the very people they are intended to lead...I see this and comment on it and I'm off topic? This article would not even exist of it were not for government being so off topic. It does not matter which side of the isle your on, none of them care about anything but themselves and the power they can cultivate over the masses.
lol...mainly referring to Ted Kennedy. But, you are right.
This question created visions of Kennedy's alcohol soaked sponge-like brain.
"These guys are commiting crimes under some bogus rubric of protecting the country." The same thing happens with environmentalism, only on a larger scale.
That's interesting.... The education system seems to be teaching children that 2+2=5 if they "feel" it does (could be 6 if they "feel" that too). Is this a possible method of torture directed towards children?
Most people will never be able to tell the difference in quality between this and the typical mp3. For the average person, the only difference is that it would be downloaded from a different server. It seems to me to be easier to mandate advertising in all P2P software. But then, no one would use it for fear of adware/spyware. From what I read here, it's all about "advertising" which has NOTHING to do with downloading anything. The question i have is...How is this any more legal than using bearshare? LMFAO! Nothing changes. The downloader still pays nothing. What's the point in all of this? Unless using this gets your computer infected.
Why so much attention for a questionable road when that road only takes a small portion of the money that is allocated? What about the rest of the money? how about focusing on the larger picture?
here again....simply downloading from different servers
I have to wonder how much hate there is in your heart????
and when you don't?
...between downloading from a P2P network and downloading from something considered more legit (like Itunes) when it's presented as DRM free? At it's very best, all it amounts to is downloading the exact same thing from a different server...especially when it's downloaded for free. All 'legit' services do give 'free' DRM free downloads. It has been said by the RIAA that "downloading is illegal and immoral". Yet, downloading from Itunes is never questioned. Why is it that when someone downloads from P2P, they are "freeloaders" but when it's a DRM free 'free' download...everything is ok? One aspect of this that does bother me is that you cannot pull up ANYTHING from the web that is NOT downloaded (in some way). The entire internet is based on the concept of "copying" things, from one computer to another. In all the arguments surrounding this issue, I have yet to hear any logical reason that justifies the actions of the recording industry on any real technical level.
It is specifically for this reason that I haven't purchased a single Sony product since then (for the only exception of blank disks).
I thought the idea was to get people TO use Vista...NOT get them off of it??????
Is this kinda of idiocy what we are to expect from a so-called tech savy Obama? People are not going to be ready in four months just like they are not ready now. If we are going to do this...THEN LET'S JUST DO IT.
It is interesting how everyone now says to stop using IE6. IE6 was never all that good to start with. Before I had to except IE6, I never went about IE5.5. Now that I have to have it, I use firefox. IE6 has always been crap.
Which way are you going? Are you saying you do or don't need trucks? I would like to know something though...how does one keep from supporting "foreign oil" while driving any gas powered vehicle?