Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches Free, Legal Music Downloads in China

Wired is reporting that Google has a launched a new music download service in China to better compete with the leading search company there, Baidu.com. Offering some 350,000 songs, a number set to rise to somewhere in the neighborhood of 1.1 million in the coming months, the library includes both Chinese and foreign artists signed by Sony Music, EMI, and Universal Music. Proponents of the new service are also hoping it will combat illegal music downloads simply by offering higher quality songs for download. There are no immediate plans to expand this service beyond China.

141 comments

  1. Legal? and in....China? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    hummm that does seem a somewhat...DIFFERENT business model...

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    1. Re:Legal? and in....China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      April Fools?

  2. Proxy anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds like a perfect way for the US to download high quality music with nothing more than a simple proxy.

    1. Re:Proxy anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And to think, all this time, they've been trying to get outside of the firewall. Now we want in!

    2. Re:Proxy anyone? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I think you need a little bit more than a simple proxy -- like the ability to read and write Chinese, for example. What are the Chinese characters for "Britney Spears" anyway?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Proxy anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Surprisingly, it sounds a lot like "blonde slut" once translated.

    4. Re:Proxy anyone? by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Funny

      These are right in the Unicode database.

      apt-get install unicode-data
      zgrep 'kDefinition.*blonde' /usr/share/unicode/Unihan.txt.bz2
      zgrep 'kDefinition.*slut' /usr/share/unicode/Unihan.txt.bz2

      The fun thing is, it's easier to search by meaning than by pronouciation or by how the character looks...

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    5. Re:Proxy anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Britney Spears is åç"oeç"oe ("Xiao tian tian" which I would very loosely translate as "Little Sweety").

      One way to get around not knowing Chinese is going to the English Wikipedia page, hitting the link to the Chinese version of the article, and correlating from one to the other with the help of Babelfish.

    6. Re:Proxy anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blitney Speals?

    7. Re:Proxy anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      åfå...妮
      http://translate.google.com
      Idiot...

  3. Link? by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone have a link to this so I can start the downloading?

    Or do I need a Chinese proxy first?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Link? by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Informative

      You will need a Chinese proxy.

      I can read just enough Chinese to know which is the download link, but what songs I get is the luck of the draw.

    2. Re:Link? by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shall we call it Chinese Roulette instead of Russian Roulette?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:Link? by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ok, there's also a flash based youtube/winamp-like player so you can preview very quickly.

      Then there is a right click context menu for downloading mp3s. The ones I got were all 192kbps.

      Best fucking music download site ever! Roll out world wide please.

    4. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can read just enough Chinese to know which is the download link, but what songs I get is the luck of the draw.

      Shall we call it Chinese Roulette instead of Russian Roulette?

      They're not that dissimilar; if you inadvertantly download "The Free Tibet Song", then the owner of the proxy gets a bullet through the head.

    5. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we're still looking for that link

    6. Re:Link? by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      I would love to give you the proxy address but it would get slashdotted really fast, and I haven't finished pirating yet so...Drink up me Hearties Yo Ho.

    7. Re:Link? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      I assume this one but the download link is blocked because it detects your IP's from US.

    8. Re:Link? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      you missed the ubiquity story ?
      that plugin will translate the text for you to whatever you like it seems

    9. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now we get to do google-stacking.

      1) Google mp3 site
      2) Google translation site
      3) ...
      4) Profit

    10. Re:Link? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      No you get 3 of your friends together, click random links, run around the car, and sit in each others' chairs, and then you get whatever the other person clicked on. That way it's still random, but you EXPECTED random.

      Wait, you'll need a car for this. OK, so you get 3 of your friends, and a car.

      OK, you'll need 3 friends as well. So 3 friends, a car, and the internet.

    11. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about two cats, a dog, a Radio Flyer wagon, some strings and paper cups, will that work instead?

    12. Re:Link? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      The ones I got were all 192kbps.

      Proponents of the new service are also hoping it will combat illegal music downloads simply by offering higher quality songs for download.

      192kbs mp3 is higher quality?? I do not think those words mean what they think they mean...

    13. Re:Link? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      Compared to 128kbs, yes.

      Course, my hearing's a bit shot from all those years listening to rock at max volume, so 128kbs sounds good to me. I'm not an audiphile.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    14. Re:Link? by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      Unless you have a very high-end system, 192kbps with LAME in VBR might as well be transparent.

    15. Re:Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google toolbar with google translate makes it readable but you'll still need a proxy. There is quite a selection available.

    16. Re:Link? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      If by very high end you mean $15 headphones, then sure.

    17. Re:Link? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Uh, many "illegal" downloads come in full lossless quality. 192kbs !> 900+kbs

  4. Surprised! by XaviorPenguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am surprised they are not blocking or at least filtering this out like they have done to YouTube and other sites on the Internet.

    --
    Friends help you move...
    REAL Friends help you move dead bodies... ^_^
  5. Positive Reinforcement by Ahnteis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let me get this straight -- massive piracy leads to free, legal downloads? I'm going to start installing p2p clients on every computer I'm asked to fix!

    1. Re:Positive Reinforcement by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just do it like the bankers - if everyone is a pirate, you're "too big to be prosecuted".

    2. Re:Positive Reinforcement by aliquis · · Score: 1

      There are no immediate plans to expand this service beyond China.

      Proof right there that there isn't enough piracy in Sweden!

      ... Or well, maybe Google thought they couldn't compete with our current distributors? =P

    3. Re:Positive Reinforcement by aliquis · · Score: 1

      That's why we make it easier for copyright holders to get information out of the ISPs starting tomorrow (IPRED, 1st april 2009) so we can get RIAA/MPAA "pay your way out" deals before it ever reaches actual prosecution over here to.

      Demanding fees from people who probably deserves it will most likely be easier to get by with than turning everyone into criminals and charging them as such.

    4. Re:Positive Reinforcement by omnipresentbob · · Score: 1

      And also too big to fail...

    5. Re:Positive Reinforcement by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      If they're giving it away for free, I wonder what'll that'd do the the "value" of the songs they keep insisting are worth hundreds of bucks each.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    6. Re:Positive Reinforcement by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Correct. In fact, for long time already, you can buy legal American movies from Walmart in China at much lower price than in the US for the same title.

    7. Re:Positive Reinforcement by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      the same thing giving trillions of dollars away to big companies does to the average working stiff's savings: make them worthless.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    8. Re:Positive Reinforcement by doniec · · Score: 1

      Of course you can, but just being cut and "a little bit later".

  6. How do you compete with free? by billlava · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If they're hoping this will stop Chinese piracy, they are crazy. Offering higher quality music with a price will only cause the pirates to up their quality, which will trickle down and benefit Chinese downloaders and purchasers of cheap MP3 CDs from Siberia to South Africa.

    1. Re:How do you compete with free? by amori · · Score: 0

      Perhaps that might actually force other countries to adopt this new business model. Google to Music Industry: Look this model works in China, on the other hand pirates are wrecking sales elsewhere, we recommend you adopt our Chinese model everywhere, this way can turn "free sales" into a profit. Works for Google, works for the consumer.

    2. Re:How do you compete with free? by snowraver1 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Google is trying to compete with free be being free. Did you even read the title of the story? And someone modded you insightful too? Can anyone manage to read a single sentance?

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    3. Re:How do you compete with free? by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree, free and higher quality isn't enough. The music sounds better knowing that you've obtained it illegally. Just like how food tastes better knowing that you'll be dining and dashing. It's the adrenaline rush that males all the difference.

    4. Re:How do you compete with free? by billlava · · Score: 1, Informative
      I read the story, but nothing offered through legitimate businesses will ever truly be free (as in beer.) There are associated costs in time, convenience, viewing ads, music selection, and other inconveniences. The fact is, Chinese piracy, like water, will always follow the past of least resistance, and that is certainly not through a Google website that shares profits with record companies.

      Can anyone manage to read a single sentance?

      Maybe I'll step up and read a whole paragraph when you learn to spell.

    5. Re:How do you compete with free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what is the solution? No matter what they do, pirates will always be able to 1-up them. Pirates are not really "competing" in the proper sense because they aren't confined by the same rules.

    6. Re:How do you compete with free? by GeorgeS · · Score: 1

      pot...meet kettle.

      will always follow the past of least resistance

      Should be " path of least resistance " ...just so you know for next time.

      --
      "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than have to have a frontal lobotomy."
    7. Re:How do you compete with free? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      "Can anyone manage to read a single ... "
      Oh look, a chinese music link to go click!

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    8. Re:How do you compete with free? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

        Can I get a female adrenaline rush?

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    9. Re:How do you compete with free? by againjj · · Score: 1

      It's the adrenaline rush that males all the difference.

      I prefer females.

    10. Re:How do you compete with free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can have the adrenalin rush of feeling all James Bondish. You know, sneaking into China, the Peoples Republic of.

      Stealing the music back across the border. So its not so much piracy as smuggling. But that's fun too.

  7. So... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, the key is to pirate songs so much that the labels have no choice but to offer legal, high quality downloads for free. Ok. Not what I expected but I'm willing to do my part...

    1. Re:So... by punkr0x · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You also have to ignore google for a while so they feel it necessary to lure you back with free songs.

  8. Give it away, Give it away, Give it away now... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, let me get this straight. In order to stop the ever-growing black market of illegal music downloading and distribution, Google chooses to open up shop for free?

    So, if I start a massive wave of downloading pirated Microsoft software, when do I get my free copy of Office?

    The Chili Peppers had it right all along I guess...

    1. Re:Give it away, Give it away, Give it away now... by Samschnooks · · Score: 3, Funny
      Exactly! As a matter of fact, put all your CDs, DVDs, and other copyrighted material on-line for free and advertise it. That's the best way to break the system.

      Stick it to the man!

    2. Re:Give it away, Give it away, Give it away now... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Why not? I just don't do the "advertise" part.

      Friends get the URL, archive.org has a backup of mp3s... It's sad to have them duplicate the disk space, but that's why I have movies/etc robotsed off. The music I listen to is rare old Black Metal, quite hard to find. But no, I won't post the URL on slashdot.

      The bands are mostly already gone -- so it's a pure win for the society.

      Be a man(/woman), symlink your ~/mp3 from Apache today!

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:Give it away, Give it away, Give it away now... by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      I have a policy in my circle of friends / family that they simply name the album / film / game they want and if I already have it it's up as soon as I can stick it on my FTP. If I don't have it they wait a few days while I "acquire" it.

      The advantages to this scheme:
      1: I look like an amazingly hoopy frood for giving away free stuff
      2: it's secure as shit as it's so personal
      3: I don't have to fix their PCs when they get some dodgy wares.

      Win-win all round :)

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    4. Re:Give it away, Give it away, Give it away now... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You sir are correct. Basically what they're doing is requiring individuals in countries that enforce copyright legislation subsidize the prices for individuals in nations that don't enforce it. Remind me again why exactly we're better off with the sort of thuggish protectionism that characterizes US IP policy.

  9. New business plan by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Give music away for free 2. ?? 3. ???

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    1. Re:New business plan by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 1

      1. Give music away for free

      2. ???
      3. The Undead roam the Earth

      --
      She made the willows dance
    2. Re:New business plan by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      This is not your typical Slashdot Meme.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    3. Re:New business plan by Camann · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's better than what they had before: 1.??? 2.??? 3.???

      --
      I can't believe you don't know what a Hasemalphaginnojinglanaporphomism is.
    4. Re:New business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Sell advertising on the site.

      3. Profit!!!

      Google's standard MO.

    5. Re:New business plan by homesnatch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure, they lose money on every sale, but they'll make it up in volume!

    6. Re:New business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0. Profit!!
      1. Give music away for free
      2. ???
      3. (Unneeded, profit covered in step 0)

    7. Re:New business plan by wojtalsd · · Score: 0

      1. Give music away.
      2. ???
      3. Profit

    8. Re:New business plan by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I assume that, being Google, ads will accompany the download service. Also, since the labels agreed to it, I would assume that they get a cut of the ad revenue.

      It may be an issue of the record labels simply agreeing to take something over nothing, however small that "something" may be.

    9. Re:New business plan by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You heard the man. Now crank it up to eleven!" - Google

    10. Re:New business plan by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not new at all. Google's business plan has always been:
      1) Create content that people want online.
      2) Give content away for free.
      3) Charge advertisers for ads delivered alongside content.
      4) Profit!
      As their profit is measured in the billions, offhand I would say this is a pretty good business plan.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    11. Re:New business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) Create content that people want online.

      Google never has created any content. They make money off of content created by others. An excellent business plan, as long as you have the near-monopoly needed to make it work.

    12. Re:New business plan by jperl · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about gnomes or google.
      I think it is:
      Phase 1: Give away music for free 2: ? Phase 3: Profit

    13. Re:New business plan by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 1

      1. Give music away for free (it begins)
      2. Spread information and knowledge across the globe for free, for all of mankind. Innovation happens faster, with an explosively booming economy and art to die for as result.
      3. The Undead roam the Earth

      That last step seemed strange to me too initially, but I heard it from a reliable source during the Pirate Bay trial so it must be true.

      --
      She made the willows dance
    14. Re:New business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems pretty obvious

      1. Get people using a service by giving away music for free
      2. add small fee for using service
      3. profit!!

    15. Re:New business plan by hobbit · · Score: 1

      It's just as well Google had that monopoly, otherwise they'd never have got off the ground </sarcasm>

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    16. Re:New business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the governments plan to bail out our economy. Spend more to make our deficit smaller :)

    17. Re:New business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My take on the backstory here: The RIAA need a new business model. They see all the free downloads, and right or wrong, cannot shake the notion they could be making money on it all. Google suggests that ad supported free downloads might make them more than the nothing they already recieve. China is an enormous market; but most of them just steal the music anyway.

      Google suggests testing this business model in China; as the RIAA has nothing to lose in that market and everything (1 billion customers) to gain. The RIAA does some quick math, and determines that something is indeed more than nothing; and agree. Then the incredibly unlikely union of Google and the RIAA set off to drive a beachhead into the Far East's advertising and music markets.

      Makes pretty good sense to me. In a market where people already download the RIAA's products for free, indirect revenue may be your only option. And when Google, a multi-billion dollar titan who operates exclusively on indirect revenue, is the one offering to host your content and provide the service; you could really do a lot worse.

      Mock them if you like, but can anyone really point out a downside here (as far as the labels are concerned)?

    18. Re:New business plan by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      I'm wondering if anybody has considered the effect of 'feeding' RIAA with a cut of the ad revenue. Won't that make it easier to pay their legal bills for new suits?

      You wanna get rid of a pest, you stop feeding it and it dies of starvation.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    19. Re:New business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure that the RIAA going bankrupt, because litigation was too expensive, is a terribly likely thing to hope for. The way things have been going lately, I think they less cases they bring to court the better; as far as their pre-pre-trial settlement threats are concerned. And frankly, the longer as the RIAA and MPAA stay focused on p2p with their legal thuggery, the happier everyone on alt.everythingelse will be.

  10. Trying to Compete by hax0r_this · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would assume that Google is paying a small price for every download. From the sound of things they might recover a small portion of their costs in ad revenue, but the real goal is to offer a compelling service to capture more of the massive Chinese advertising market.

    Chinese Internet users now make up something like half of all internet users, and Google is currently losing to Baidu in that market. Thats a HUGE market to be losing in. So even if Google sees a net loss on offering music downloads, if they can become to Chinese internet users what they are to internet users in the rest of the world they just nearly doubled their ad viewers. Sure, an ad view in China is probably worth a little less, but with billions of viewers it hardly matters.

    1. Re:Trying to Compete by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, Google is holding a large chunk of Baidu's shares (some 40%?).

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  11. Smart Business Model by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

    1. Generate a random mashup of various pots and pans being dropped down a flight of stairs.

    2. Sell them through Google.

    3. In China*

    4. Profit!

    * Note: Model only valid in China.

    1. Re:Smart Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First we had "didn't read the article", then came "didn't read the summary", but you've really taken it to the next step here with "didn't read the third word in the title". Very impressive, nice work.

  12. Here's an Idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try selling FLACs? Hell, if I'm paying for music, it better damned be loseless.

    1. Re:Here's an Idea: by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Because you have some source of lossless audio other than online?

      Unless you buy the audio directly from the studio after is recorded before any sort of post processing, you are getting lossy compressed audio. The very act of converting from analog to digital is EXTREMELY lossy when you consider the fact that an infinite amount of precision is lost in the process in exchange for long term stability.

      Even CDs are lossy to some extent just because of errors during mass production. The goal is to not loss quality, but it happens either way. The music on a CD from any label today has already been compressed anyway at the cost of dynamic range so Brittney can be a little louder and different, just like everyone else.

      So you're all gung ho about requiring FLAC for your downloads as if you'll be missing out on something otherwise, yet every other source of the music you have has already undergone extensive compression.

      Personally, I find FLACers rather amusing. Do you have one of those tube-amp motherboards and listen only on your $1500 head phones as well?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Here's an Idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you have some source of lossless audio other than online?

      Unless you buy the audio directly from the studio after is recorded before any sort of post processing, you are getting lossy compressed audio. The very act of converting from analog to digital is EXTREMELY lossy when you consider the fact that an infinite amount of precision is lost in the process in exchange for long term stability.

      Even CDs are lossy to some extent just because of errors during mass production. The goal is to not loss quality, but it happens either way. The music on a CD from any label today has already been compressed anyway at the cost of dynamic range so Brittney can be a little louder and different, just like everyone else.

      So you're all gung ho about requiring FLAC for your downloads as if you'll be missing out on something otherwise, yet every other source of the music you have has already undergone extensive compression.

      Personally, I find FLACers rather amusing. Do you have one of those tube-amp motherboards and listen only on your $1500 head phones as well?

      In other words ...


      Dear Sir,

      You are smug. You are in fact very smug. But I have ways of dealing with smug people like you. Voila! Watch as I overcome your audiophile smugness with EVEN MORE SMUGNESS and ridicule your expensive tube amps and format preference. I mean really, how DARE you say that you like FLAC more than you like MP3?! Clearly you are not "in the know" so much as me! Hah! You, sir, have now been one-upped! Just pretend like I didn't do the same thing you did, mmkay?

      Sincerely,
      BitZtream - well not really. I'm not BitZtream. I'm just an AC making fun of BitZtream. Ain't hypocrisy great?!

    3. Re:Here's an Idea: by hobbit · · Score: 1

      And hell, if you're paying for cables, they'd better be made of solid gold.

      Maybe audiophiles are the future for the RIAA. 320Kbps AACs will be available for free, but FLACs of studio masters will cost $500 per track and will be eagerly snapped up by those who claim to be able to tell the difference.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    4. Re:Here's an Idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The very act of converting from analog to digital is EXTREMELY lossy when you consider the fact that an infinite amount of precision is lost in the process in exchange for long term stability.

      Actually, no.

    5. Re:Here's an Idea: by pwfffff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, folks, it really is smug replies all the way down. Even this one! Morons.

    6. Re:Here's an Idea: by alx5000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that... You may wanna look up quantization, though...

      --
      My 0.02 cents
  13. Questions by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    1. Everything's "legal" in China, right?

    2. If it's on the Internet in China, it's probably on the Internet everywhere else, right?

    3. And the labels are going along with this...why?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything's "legal" in China, right?

      Absolutely not. It is strictly illegal to say anything that could be interpreted as criticism of the government.

  14. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by davidsyes · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The US starts trying to use Google as a VOA (Voice of America) megaphone, then then Chinese ban ALL songs not provided with 100% faithful lyrics sheets, so as to screen out pseudo-anti-Chinese-Government songs, or songs that over-sell the greatness of the USA. Songs like "Born in the USA" will likely get binned (but, for all i know it is available for years...). I imagine Prince's (the artist formerly known as Prince, formerly known NOT as Prince, then formerly now formally known as Prince) "Erotic City" (We can FUCK until the dawn, making love til cherry's gone...) will be binned, unless not yet censored.

    Yeh, i can just see Google getting paid (and bending over for the money) the USA VOA machine, cuz, business is business. I hope "do no wrong" applies to not pumping a megaphonic pathway into another country's borders. Locals should HUNT for, not be blasted BY content they don't want nor don't need.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  15. Exactly... by billlava · · Score: 1

    Companies like Amazon and Apple have found ways to monetize music downloads in the USA where we have huge organizations devoted to protecting copyrighted music by threatening with lawsuits that nobody can afford to be involved with. For the other 75% of the world that does not live in such a court-happy western country, however piracy rules the day.

  16. won't fly by squoozer · · Score: 1

    They are trying to sell the one thing that is easier to rip off than anything man has ever produced before to a nation virtually built on ripping things off. Yeah that's going to work really well.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:won't fly by omnipresentbob · · Score: 1

      They're not *selling* anything, though. It's all completely free.

      The money comes from ads...

      I didn't see any when I checked it out, but then again, I don't read/speak/understand chinese

    2. Re:won't fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are trying to sell the one thing that is easier to rip off than anything man has ever produced before to a nation virtually built on ripping things off. Yeah that's going to work really well.

      Easy- to the consumers, they're not selling it, they're giving it away. They're trying to route the illegal downloads to legal, *free* downloads-- Music files free of viruses, etc. From there, they'd generate ad revenue. I'm not sure why you're assuming it's an instant failure.

  17. What's the difference? by prndll · · Score: 0

    Most people will never be able to tell the difference in quality between this and the typical mp3. For the average person, the only difference is that it would be downloaded from a different server. It seems to me to be easier to mandate advertising in all P2P software. But then, no one would use it for fear of adware/spyware. From what I read here, it's all about "advertising" which has NOTHING to do with downloading anything. The question i have is...How is this any more legal than using bearshare? LMFAO! Nothing changes. The downloader still pays nothing. What's the point in all of this? Unless using this gets your computer infected.

  18. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    '"Born in the USA" will likely get binned...'

    Have you listened to the lyrics?

    Like, REALLY listened to the lyrics?

    I'm not just talking Republican National Convention playing the chorus over and over. Seriously. Born in the USA is not a shining example of feel-good patriotism. It's an ironic intervention against an America that's forgotten its defenders.

  19. China is Solvent by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Well, since the huge China is the only country besides maybe little Canada that is actually solvent, it makes sense to launch this service there.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  20. Google's music download address by pythonist · · Score: 1

    Google's music download service in China:

    http://g.cn/music

    and their very cool music screener

    http://www.google.cn/music/songscreener

    1. Re:Google's music download address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and you can download to your hearts content with the PROC worry free guarantee of a malware/spyware free experience. http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&sid=09/03/28/190251

          ha ah aa aha ha ahah aha ahah aha ah ahaa haa ha aha haa ahaha haha haha hahaa ahaha ahaha ahaha ahaha ah a...cough cough..hga ha aha ahaha aha haa haaha hahahahaa haha aha aha ahaa haha aha ha

  21. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by DittoBox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bruce Springsteen's 'Born In The USA' Lyrics:

    Born down in a dead man's town
    The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
    You end up like a dog that's been beat too much
    'Til you spend half your life just covering up

    [chorus:]
    Born in the U.S.A.
    Born in the U.S.A.
    Born in the U.S.A.
    Born in the U.S.A.

    I got in a little hometown jam
    And so they put a rifle in my hands
    Sent me off to Vietnam
    To go and kill the yellow man

    [chorus]

    Come back home to the refinery
    Hiring man says "Son if it was up to me"
    I go down to see the V.A. man
    He said "Son don't you understand"

    [chorus]

    I had a buddy at Khe Sahn
    Fighting off the Viet Cong
    They're still there, he's all gone
    He had a little girl in Saigon
    I got a picture of him in her arms

    Down in the shadow of the penitentiary
    Out by the gas fires of the refinery
    I'm ten years down the road
    Nowhere to run, ain't got nowhere to go

    I'm a long gone Daddy in the U.S.A.
    Born in the U.S.A.
    I'm a cool rocking Daddy in the U.S.A.
    Born in the U.S.A.

    --
    Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
  22. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by kdemetter · · Score: 1

    I always hear it like "Porn in the USA" .

  23. How many pairs of handcuffs does it take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly! As a matter of fact, put all your CDs, DVDs, and other copyrighted material on-line for free and advertise it. That's the best way to break the system.

    Stick it to the man!

    Heh, while your idea has some merit, we've still got to be careful, here in the Land of the Not-So-Free and the Home of the McLawsuit.

    Famous last words in any large-crowd revolt against Da Man: "They can't possibly arrest ALL of us!"

  24. we have both kinds, country AND western! by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    the library includes both Chinese and foreign artists

    But ... but ... but Chinese artists ARE foreign!!

  25. To help you all out: by Landak · · Score: 2, Informative

    List of free online public proxies located in china, listed by latency:

    http://www.xroxy.com/proxylist.php?port=&type=&ssl=&country=CN&latency=1000&reliability=9000&sort=latency#table

    "Easy listening songs" from google: here.

    Note that the characters "äè½½" mean download, and if slashdot murders that for you, it's the link in the penultimate column in the table. Going down the left hand side of the page are words that correspond to different genres. In order, from the top, they are:

    - New (release) music
    - Chinese music
    - European/American music
    - Japanese music
    - Pop music
    - Rock music
    - Hip-hop music
    - Soundtrack music
    - 'Ethnic' music (though presumably not the "Free tibet" rap...)
    - Latin music
    - R&B music
    - Country music
    - Folk music
    - Soul music
    - Easy-listening music
    - "JnB" music

    Enjoy!

    --
    My UID is prime. Is yours?
    1. Re:To help you all out: by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      The Google service is only a front-end search engine. The music files are hosted on a bunch of hosts in the domain "top100.cn" e.g. "file4.top100.cn" (Top100.cn being a Google partner). The interesting part is, if you try to resolve the hostnames using a nameserver outside China, you'll receive very funny results. Look at the output of dig:

      This is using a DNS server in China: http://pastebin.com/m67e3f7c4

      This is using a DNS server in the USA: http://pastebin.com/f5233fc2e

      Note the difference?

      So, in order to download songs from top100.cn's file server farm, you have to have a Chinese DNS resolving the hostnames for you.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  26. Re:New Orleans vs. Fargo by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what's the difference?

    The hurricane?

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  27. Offtopic baidu test by danking · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is off topic, but I have a little experiment for anyone who wants to give it a try. 1. goto baidu.com 2. search for anything or click on the page 3. Does it work? 4. go back to baidu.com 5. now search for falun gong 6. Did it work? 7. If not try going back to baidu.com, make sure you reference the page and don't just click back I did this and after I searched falun gong I seem to have been temporarily blocked from using the webpage. My connection seems to be getting interrupted.

    1. Re:Offtopic baidu test by weeeeed · · Score: 1

      The chinese firewall at work. That's how it works, it was covered many many times previously here on Slashdot.

      Btw, we here in Germany are getting our very own firewall very soon too and our proletariat seems to love it.

  28. Free? by highfidelitychris · · Score: 1

    How is allowing users to download for free able to compete with free pirated versions? Maybe it's not free, but it doesn't state how much (if anything) it costs for this service...

  29. Again, I compete with people who pay less by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I pay $5 for a pill, they pay the same company .10 for the same pill.
    I pay $15 for a CD (well actually not directly for 8 years), they pay nothing.
    I pay $50k for a college education, they come here to the same school and get massively subsidized.

    It really seems like the world economy exists to pump the wealth out of my environment.

    While I don't pay $15 for a CD, others pay that and so they have to charge prices for their products and labors that will cover that.

    I keep telling myself it will even out at some point- but then they get laws passed that say they can sell a product in another country for $1 and it is illegal to import/resale that product in my country for $1.10 instead of the $15 I pay.

    It is anti-capitalist. I could handle my wages going down 10% a year if the prices I pay for goods were going down at the same rate.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Again, I compete with people who pay less by Robert1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, thank you. This is exactly the problem with free-trade, it seems to be designed entirely to sap the wealth out of richer countries and give them to poorer countries. Free-trade in principal would be a great idea, except for the fact that it seems the US (and a very few other western nations) are the only countries that actually practice the 'free' part of free-trade.

      Oh yeah, sure export your foreign vehicles, do you mind if we send some to you Japan? Oh what's that, you put giant tariffs and unit limits on your American imports? That's ok, we won't do anything to combat it, nor put tariffs in place ourselves, cause we play nice.

      Another great example was an article from the Economist a few years back. Basically it was an American bike company saying they were going out of business because Chinese bikes could be sold for less. They explained that although they had harder workers per hour, greater output, and greater efficiency, the (justified) environmental laws put into place in the US to prevent pollution added enough of a burden to the bike manufacture that bikes made in China which had no environmental oversight could be produced and shipped cheaper than the native bike. They also showed that if China had proper anti-pollution in place, the bike could be produced for CHEAPER in America than in China.

      But I guess we're the only ones that play by the rules.

    2. Re:Again, I compete with people who pay less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalism is taking more money from those who have more money, and paying those less who can live on less. If you live in the USA, take comfort that you're paying less than Europeans for a lot of things.

    3. Re:Again, I compete with people who pay less by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      It is anti-capitalist. I could handle my wages going down 10% a year if the prices I pay for goods were going down at the same rate.

      That's exactly what has happened, except in the reverse order.

      Prices dropped (relatively) on consumer goods due to globalisation (see prices at Walmart, for example). Wages stayed high. Now, due to the recession, wages are dropping (in effect -- more people unemployed ~= lower wages).

      Not you specifically, but anyone who complains about globalisation or offshoring, but shops at Walmart, needs to check themselves.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Again, I compete with people who pay less by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      I pay $50k for a college education, they come here to the same school and get massively subsidized.

      First, really smart people from anywhere gets subsidized, period. Other than that, foreign students pays high tuition and no program to subsidize them (some would work illegally on the side). Most the subsidies you talked about are in science/tech Ph.D. programs where there is usually fee remission with TA-ship/RA-ship. Not every PI enthusiastically takes on foreign student because they do cost more of their grant money. Frankly I think the issue is that there aren't just enough native Ph.D. students (for whom fee is cheat once they establish residency) because for some reason, Americans tend to shun these degrees??

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    5. Re:Again, I compete with people who pay less by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 1

      You don't HAVE to pay first-world prices for those things; that's what the global marketplace is all about. The catch is, you don't "have" to get a first-world salary, either.

      But let's get this straight. Foreign students pay higher tuition fees. That's why colleges are so keen to get international students and their money. Of course, many of them come from places where the income level isn't high enough to afford those inflated fees, so they have to earn it through work-study or merit-based scholarships. But far from being "massively subsidized", "they" are actually subsidizing YOUR education through international student tuition.

      Globalization is a bitch, isn't it?

    6. Re:Again, I compete with people who pay less by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Our first world salary has been going down for 20 years while the rich and executive classes salaries went up by 300x.

      As for the "global" marketplace-- reread what I said.

      Companies sell their products extremely inexpensively in poor countries, extremely expensively in rich companies, and have laws passed to prevent product flow from where they sell the same exact product for 1/10th of the price.

      The way it used to work is that if you sold a TV for $50 in Cleveland, and $500 in California, a cross import business would start up very quickly. The way it is today, the government actively prevents reimportation of drugs, movies, cd's, clothing, etc. Our tax dollars at work preventing the prices from dropping. And these days, the profits are funneled to the executives (not even the shareholders any more- since shareholders voice was taken away by deleware incorporation laws).

      It won't last. People went way into debt to try and make it last a few more years. Now the game is over. Easy credit is over.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:Again, I compete with people who pay less by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      It really seems like the world economy exists to pump the wealth out of my environment.

      I see this going on in my country as well (small West-European). Except, we actively aid this process by spending 0.8% of our GDP to foreign aid. Personally, I feel that we lead a pretty good life and I also feel it's my moral obligation to pass on some of that wealth.

      I have the feeling you're seeing the issue cast in a negative light. Instead, think about how you're in the luxurious position of being able to miss some of your earnings.

      Enough with the touchy-feely, on to the facts...

      as a percent of gross national income, its contribution is only 0.2%, proportionally much smaller than than contributions of countries such as Sweden (1.04% and the United Kingdom (0.52%).

      -- Foreign aid by the US

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  30. What keeps Baidu from... by mistapotta · · Score: 1

    ...deep-linking to the songs on Google's servers? It'd be upsetting for Google if they setup all the infrastructure, eat all the costs, and Baidu reaps the rewards by linking to the self-same content.

  31. DRM by He+who+knows · · Score: 1

    What hidden DRM will there be. I'm thinking a lot.

    1. Re:DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are watermarks in tags.

  32. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    It's an ironic intervention against an America that's forgotten its defenders.

    Yes. It's similar in vein to lots of other songs that have been misunderstood:

    • This Land is Your Land, Woodie Guthrie. The song is really a direct rebuttal of Irving Berlin's "God Bless America".
    • Little Pink Houses, John "Cougar" Mellencamp. Song about how the poor and disadvantaged. People hear the refrain: "Oh, but that ain't America, You and Me. Ain't that America, Somethin' to see, Baby, Ain't that America, home of the free, yeah..." and think Mellencamp is being patriotic. Hardly.
    • Every Breath You Take, The Police. Not a love song. It's a song about obsession.
  33. lettaudesigns by lettaudesigns · · Score: 1

    It's amazing at what google is doing now days. I guess I'm really inspired by Google because I am a software engineer that finds how they go about their business very unique. I wrote an article on my blog about why you should use Google. The blog is focused on helping people who are new to computers/internet and want to learn to use them more efficiently. Check out the article about why you should use google at http://onlineinnovation.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-you-should-use-google.html If you have any suggestions for topics to write about, let me know!!! I'm doing this because I feel that this information would have been VERY useful to me when I first started using computers/internet.

    1. Re:lettaudesigns by moniker127 · · Score: 1

      You modified unique.
      *Slaps with a glove*

      I challange you, sir, to a duel!

      Through I do agree about google.

    2. Re:lettaudesigns by u38cg · · Score: 1

      I think you should do an expose on 4chan.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  34. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by JumperCables233 · · Score: 0

    I can hear the sound of RIAA stormtroopers and attack dogs laying siege your house as we speak.

  35. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I always hear it like "Porn in the USA" .

    I don't know what I hear it as, as the top few results in YouTube "are not available in your country". Thanks, PRS.

    Ah, Songza (music search engine) to the rescue: http://songza.com/z/n7okam

    Having read the lyrics I'll now think of the song in a completely different way.

  36. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by kabocox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmm, that sounds exactly like the type of anti-US song that other nations would want their citizens to hear about the US. Any song that makes the US in general sound like a worse place to live than a third world country or about the same as that won't be on any other nations' banned list.

  37. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by Hatta · · Score: 1

    It reminds me of the commercial a couple years back, where they used CCR's "Fortunate Son". The part they used said "Some folks were born, made to wave the flag. Oooh they're red white & blue." Of course, they cut the line afterwards that said "It ain't me". Talk about missing the point.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  38. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by Hatta · · Score: 1

    I thought of another one. The theme song to CSI is "Won't get fooled again" by the Who. This is a song about anti-authoritarianism. I can hardly think of a more authoritarian show than CSI.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  39. Re:New Orleans vs. Fargo by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    So what's the difference?

    Don't expect too much from the city synonymous with Mardis Gras.

  40. Re:Get Inside! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait, what about Asymmetrical Torrents?

    They download music, they upload forbidden news blogs?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  41. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Oh, now i guess i'm supposed to think that other nations don't have their patriots of old who have been replaced in modern times by corrupt, selfish, wanton types, huh?

    How many Chinese do you think LOVE their current leadership. It's why their current government is doing what it is doing, all in the name of NOT losing power in the form it knows and with which it currently is comfortable. China's government & Chinese nationals are not alone. But, whether the BITUSA lyrics are supposed to be a beacon of shining light or mirror of shame, if the Chinese government *listens*, i mean **really listens**, they can spin whatever they want, and make YOU, ME, or anyone else coming in with political change ambitions suddenly persona non grata. BITUSA might work well for SOME US citizens, but by NO means whatsoever does it neatly drape a flag of hope or optimism onto even Chinese citizens who DO despise or feel disheartened with their own government. The world is NOT that of the USA, and citizens/residents/adherents of/to the USA need to stop casting the US shadow onto other peoples.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  42. Re:New Orleans vs. Fargo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's the difference?

    Fargo: estimated metropolitan population of 192,417

    New Orleans: estimated metropolitan population of 1,030,363
     
    Looks like an order of magnitude, to me.

  43. Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very old news. This site has been operating for over a year now. Top100.cn.

    YaoMing was one of the founders (the tall chinese basketball star)...

    Some of the downloads are not the cd version of the track, but the live concert version. Some most popular songs are not available. It is hit and miss - but there is still a LOT of good music on it.

  44. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by jackbird · · Score: 1

    How about when they used Janis Joplin's "Mercedes Benz" in a Mercedes commercial? And then there's the unmitigated wierdness of Chevrolet using the chorus of "American Pie" in an ad, which according to Don MacLean they had been trying to license for decades.

  45. So what we need now by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Is some sort of server that indexes these links and based on some form of translation helps you find the song that's relevant to your interests. A kind of 'search engine' if you get my meaning.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  46. Not really legal by realwhz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it is really legal, who not provide the similar service out of China?

  47. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by interested+pyro · · Score: 0

    hmmmm, no wonder I cant make any calls now. must....... erase....... everything!

  48. Re:Proxy anyone? Until... by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

    It's the same anti-US message that should be spread in the US as well.