>> How do you conclude that far more advanced than us would want to avoid detection?
> If they didn't, then we would see them.
That's assuming a lot! Try thinking about a human conversation that starts this
Q. If you had the best technology, why did you never try to contact me?
The answers could be anywhere on the spectrum
1) I don't give a damn about you. 2) I've got better things to do. 3) You've only been these for 10,000 years. 4) You assume life detection in the universe this big is easy. 5) You assume that you are the only fish in the sea.... and so on without even having to include active hiding. Actively hiding is an extremely simplistic assumption right there with religious types believing in a "caring God"! (assinging human like qualities to a supreme being)
Ed Nisley had reviewed this in Dr. Dobb's Journal. The review is available here. I had just read the article this morning and was pleasently surprised to see the review here.
Do you really have to see a conspiracy in everything? Or is it out of fear for posting on here that you have to say something negative before you can say anything positive about any issue?
You must read Paul Graham's article closely. It is still identifiable as spam cuz of the phrases. As for AOL dorks sending out emails like that, I hope you don't have friends who send emails like that to you. If you are including header data in your checking routine too, your friends will also get excluded since they'll have nonspam emails in the training data.
I was using the hybrid approach until Bayesian filtering started performing better than SpamAssassin (No false positives, More trapped spam, less upgrade mania) and then I just dumped SpamAssassin.
I myself depend heavily on the RSS backend provided by both freshmeat and appwatch. Freshmeat doesn't provide the changelog in it's RSS feed whereas AppWatch did. That makes a LOT of difference when looking at news aggregators or your own processed feed.
This was done for Solaris 2.7 by Sun. Solaris 2.7 was renamed as Solaris 7 and now it on on version 8. It's not difficult that Sun may even do the same thing to Java.
What the original poster meant was that it could be any country. China was just an example to illustrate the point. As for exposing their shelld, they may be trying it out. You know, 'Testing' the technology they have and preparedness of the world to deal with it.
I think it's canadians!!! They never liked our joking about them!!!
How about standardizing the representation of command lines in short form to indicate which option is optional and which is not or which one takes an argument/arguments and which does not or which options exclude each other.
e.g. prog [ -a | -b ]
is a widely accepted to mean that prog takes option -a or -b and not together. How about extending this for multiple option cases like -a can occur with -b and -c, -b can occur with -d and -a etc. I had need to do this recently to standardize the reading of meaning of those options across multiple departments of our company. Is any work being done on it anywhere?
Slashdot Mirror
>> How do you conclude that far more advanced than us would want to avoid detection?
... and so on without even having to include active hiding. Actively hiding is an extremely simplistic assumption right there with religious types believing in a "caring God"! (assinging human like qualities to a supreme being)
> If they didn't, then we would see them.
That's assuming a lot! Try thinking about a human conversation that starts this
Q. If you had the best technology, why did you never try to contact me?
The answers could be anywhere on the spectrum
1) I don't give a damn about you.
2) I've got better things to do.
3) You've only been these for 10,000 years.
4) You assume life detection in the universe this big is easy.
5) You assume that you are the only fish in the sea.
3) They're far more advanced than us...which means they have the smarts to avoid detection so we won't see them at all.
How do you conclude that far more advanced than us would want to avoid detection?
Also, you miss the whole range between "us" and "far more advanced" beings.
Ed Nisley had reviewed this in Dr. Dobb's Journal. The review is available here. I had just read the article this morning and was pleasently surprised to see the review here.
Do you really have to see a conspiracy in everything? Or is it out of fear for posting on here that you have to say something negative before you can say anything positive about any issue?
You must read Paul Graham's article closely. It is still identifiable as spam cuz of the phrases. As for AOL dorks sending out emails like that, I hope you don't have friends who send emails like that to you. If you are including header data in your checking routine too, your friends will also get excluded since they'll have nonspam emails in the training data.
I was using the hybrid approach until Bayesian filtering started performing better than SpamAssassin (No false positives, More trapped spam, less upgrade mania) and then I just dumped SpamAssassin.
Would you mind sharing the implementation for Bayesian filter?
:)
As for the series design, I am doing the exact same thing
CPAN has a perl module that I am using
Mail::SpamTest::Bayesian
Today after about 280 spams training, it surpassed SpamAssassin 2.40 (today's release)'s filtering and detected a spam where SpamAssassin failed.
Just an FYI.
It's just JINI in a new bottle (pun intended)
Rss Backend.
I myself depend heavily on the RSS backend provided by both freshmeat and appwatch. Freshmeat doesn't provide the changelog in it's RSS feed whereas AppWatch did. That makes a LOT of difference when looking at news aggregators or your own processed feed.
it's bad!?!?!?!
Hail Linux!
Hail CmdrTaco's trolling!
Down with Solaris!
Down with Sun!
Yes. It came from a project called "Blacker" project. Here's the Linux Magazine article where he states that.
Note:
It was you wasn't it!!!
I lost the 1st..wait..2nd...umm...42nd post.
This was done for Solaris 2.7 by Sun. Solaris 2.7 was renamed as Solaris 7 and now it on on version 8. It's not difficult that Sun may even do the same thing to Java.
What the original poster meant was that it could be any country. China was just an example to illustrate the point. As for exposing their shelld, they may be trying it out. You know, 'Testing' the technology they have and preparedness of the world to deal with it.
I think it's canadians!!! They never liked our joking about them!!!
1) stacheldraht"
2) trinoo
3) tfn tribe flood network
4) tfn2k
5) Cert's denial of service tools
Useful?
RobLizo!!! :-)
GreenMeat
Sue
Sue
e.g. prog [ -a | -b ]
is a widely accepted to mean that prog takes option -a or -b and not together. How about extending this for multiple option cases like -a can occur with -b and -c, -b can occur with -d and -a etc. I had need to do this recently to standardize the reading of meaning of those options across multiple departments of our company. Is any work being done on it anywhere?