"tough luck, we pay the ticket and you pay us back from your allowance".
Am I the only one who thinks that kids who still recieves allowance shouldn't be allowed to drive?
I was going to write a long rant about how i use gentoo and that it rocks. But my firefox haven't compiled yet and i can't be bothered with lynx anymore. I might come back tommorow and rant. kthx
Mod TORRENT up.... Ripping dvds, djeezus. It's faster to just download an xvid from your favorite torrentsite. 20Mbps is pretty cheap now-adays. And i'm not even from SWEDEN.
PLUS: This proves that there ARE people out there interested in breaking into Linux boxes. It's just that this is the best way they can find to do it and I think that says a lot. So let's not hear any more of this "Linux would have trojanes too if it were as popular as Windows" bull. Between this and the MySQL on Windows worm:
I changed a word for you and made it TRUE. If the average moron would move to linux, people would still get their machines rooted because of the new porn downloader they managed to install and give root access.
It's very difficult to remotely root an up to date windows machine with just Remote Desktop running on it. Just as safe as Linux with SSH.
I'm sorry but that's nonsense.
Update stage servers, test, and then patch production servers. I have had no problems the last 5 years with this method.
And a reboot doesn't mean service-downtime. If it does for you, you're doing it wrong.
That's because you don't want a server to just gloss over and ignore the fact your RAID array is fucked and data is being sent to oblivion and that sort of thing.
It doesn't take a long time just for the sake of taking a long time, it takes a long time to make sure everything is correct as it should be.
How often do you reboot your servers anyway? It shouldn't be more than a few times a year at most.
Patch tuesday. :
So a few reboots a year = b.S
Also i compile new linux kernel i cron && reboot.
. I'm personally a fan of perimeterless networking, where each machine is expected to handle its own firewall. Done right, it can make administration easier, give better security, and keeps laptops safe no matter where they're connected.
If you want to allow, say, VLAN 100 to access VLAN 105 on specified ports that would be difficult to do on a computer level since you could only filter on ip-range / ports. And that would be rather insecure unless you're using ipsec. Also you will have management overhead when there's a security bug in the firewall software.
But I too like having firewalls on servers and computers. But rules for outgoing connections and between vlans is managed centrally. It's a good additional layer if you can manage it, but don't use it as the only layer.
I get a raging hard-on just for THINKING i took viagra. Placebo is king.
What is the world average if you don't count china?
"tough luck, we pay the ticket and you pay us back from your allowance". Am I the only one who thinks that kids who still recieves allowance shouldn't be allowed to drive?
CC: me too. Very interesting in hearing what you did.
about new gentoo releases? Someone should post a story everytime they emerge --sync && emerge world
By monitoring your computers network activity from the firewall. Also using IDS like tripwire.
If you tried to install a 8 year old build of a linux distro and connected to wrong network i'm pretty sure you would have that problem!
UPDATING YOUR SOFTWARE. (don't forget your browser plugins)
My left hand?
I was going to write a long rant about how i use gentoo and that it rocks. But my firefox haven't compiled yet and i can't be bothered with lynx anymore. I might come back tommorow and rant. kthx
This is the FBI. He's too busy chasing aliens to have a wife...
Mod TORRENT up.... Ripping dvds, djeezus. It's faster to just download an xvid from your favorite torrentsite. 20Mbps is pretty cheap now-adays. And i'm not even from SWEDEN.
Why doesn't the damn thing just play the divx files when I connect up a USB hard drive? .
Cuz ur doing it rong? Seriously. Have you updated your dashboard in the last two years?
For me they sent UPS on my door to pick it up. Didn't have to package it or anything. UPS did that for me. :)
PLUS: This proves that there ARE people out there interested in breaking into Linux boxes. It's just that this is the best way they can find to do it and I think that says a lot. So let's not hear any more of this "Linux would have trojanes too if it were as popular as Windows" bull. Between this and the MySQL on Windows worm:
I changed a word for you and made it TRUE. If the average moron would move to linux, people would still get their machines rooted because of the new porn downloader they managed to install and give root access. It's very difficult to remotely root an up to date windows machine with just Remote Desktop running on it. Just as safe as Linux with SSH.
Or an infected computer where windows update is borked.
Here's a foreign language lesson for you. In europe, podcasts is called audiofiles.
Still compiling your gentoo, eh?
And you're an internet super hero!
The easiest person to sell to is another salesman.
This might be what you're after
You're welcome.
I'm sorry but that's nonsense. Update stage servers, test, and then patch production servers. I have had no problems the last 5 years with this method. And a reboot doesn't mean service-downtime. If it does for you, you're doing it wrong.
That's because you don't want a server to just gloss over and ignore the fact your RAID array is fucked and data is being sent to oblivion and that sort of thing.
It doesn't take a long time just for the sake of taking a long time, it takes a long time to make sure everything is correct as it should be.
How often do you reboot your servers anyway? It shouldn't be more than a few times a year at most.
Patch tuesday. : So a few reboots a year = b.S Also i compile new linux kernel i cron && reboot.
Everyone knows that. So i think that's a pretty redundant comment i think that comment is.
. I'm personally a fan of perimeterless networking, where each machine is expected to handle its own firewall. Done right, it can make administration easier, give better security, and keeps laptops safe no matter where they're connected.
If you want to allow, say, VLAN 100 to access VLAN 105 on specified ports that would be difficult to do on a computer level since you could only filter on ip-range / ports. And that would be rather insecure unless you're using ipsec. Also you will have management overhead when there's a security bug in the firewall software. But I too like having firewalls on servers and computers. But rules for outgoing connections and between vlans is managed centrally. It's a good additional layer if you can manage it, but don't use it as the only layer.