Slashdot Mirror


Sony Sued Over Bricked PS3s

Zarrot writes "If Sony's recent 3.00 PS3 firmware update bricked your console, you may now have legal recourse thanks to a class action suit against Sony. The complaint alleges that thousands of users (PDF) were affected by the update, and in some cases the PS3 hardware itself was damaged. It continues, 'For owners who sustained hardware damage from the Sony-required update, Sony is charging a $150 repair fee per unit. Sony, responding to the numerous complaints about the unacceptable effects of the defective update, released a further, optional update that it claimed "improves system stability" — yet performance problems continued, and the new update did nothing to remedy the systems of users who sustained hardware damage."'"

438 comments

  1. XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Never ascribe to incompetence that which can be explained by greedy self-interest. Is it possible that this was deliberate? After all, they deliberately rooted thousands of PCs (inclusing mine) a few years ago, so you KNOW they're evil even by corporate standards, and they're charging $150 to fix a problem that their "update" caused.

    They won't brick MY PS3, because there's no way in hell I'll buy another product from the company that rooted my computer with a trojan in a music CD. Why do people keep buying stuff from this company? I won't -- once bitten, twice shy. Buy from Sony and you're asking to get screwed, with sand as lube.

    1. Re:XCP on steroids! by JeffSpudrinski · · Score: 4, Informative

      Didn't this same thing happen recently with the Wii console?

      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/10/01/0626228

      One used to be able to trust the mainstream console makers, but not so much anymore.

    2. Re:XCP on steroids! by caladine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Especially since Nintendo seems to have removed the message about repairing at no cost as well...
      http://techforums.nintendo.com/nins/board/message?board.id=wii_tech&thread.id=29992

    3. Re:XCP on steroids! by Garridan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm wondering why this isn't a criminal case. They broke your shit, and now they're charging you to fix it? Sounds like a clear case of extortion to me. Screw the lawsuit, let's put some people in jail -- oh wait -- prison, because they did it across state lines.

    4. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They broke your shit,

      Sony claiming the hardware is licensed, not sold in 3... 2... 1...

    5. Re:XCP on steroids! by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1

      Is it possible that this was deliberate?

      I'm not even going to tough the rest of your post, but you can't be serious here. Pissing off your extremely well networked customer base enough to start a class action lawsuit by deliberately bricking your *latest* offering? Wtf.

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    6. Re:XCP on steroids! by galaad2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      let's not forget the screwed by sony part...
      sony pushed a "special" screw for 61+ euro when it was not special at all.

      http://i35.tinypic.com/2q1z68m.jpg

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2007/may/28/sonyuserscrew

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    7. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read - elsewhere - that they removed it because the wording was poor and it was going to make them fix issues other than bad firmware - including user damage. Now, they're looking at it on a case-by-case basis. They should have just fixed the wording, though.

    8. Re:XCP on steroids! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Never ascribe to incompetence that which can be explained by greedy self-interest. Is it possible that this was deliberate? After all, they deliberately rooted thousands of PCs (inclusing mine) a few years ago, so you KNOW they're evil even by corporate standards, and they're charging $150 to fix a problem that their "update" caused.

      They won't brick MY PS3, because there's no way in hell I'll buy another product from the company that rooted my computer with a trojan in a music CD. Why do people keep buying stuff from this company? I won't -- once bitten, twice shy. Buy from Sony and you're asking to get screwed, with sand as lube.

      Despite my being a Nintendo fanboy and somebody who despises Sony, I can't follow you with the pitchfork on this one. This sort of scam requires exreme levels of short-sighted-stupidity and greed, that Microsoft hasn't even reached. There's no way any guy wearing a tie there is going to see that as profitable even after the legal settlements.

      Brick happens.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I imagine for the same reason that nobody went to prison over XCP. If I'd done to one of their computers what they did to mine, I'd be in prison right now.

    10. Re:XCP on steroids! by Amnenth · · Score: 1

      The firmware on board night be licensed, but the hardware itself is sold.

    11. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Pissing off your extremely well networked customer base enough to start a class action lawsuit by deliberately bricking your *latest* offering? Wtf.

      As opposed to rooting your paying customers' PCs with a trojan loaded on a music CD? I hardly see the difference, except in this case they charge you $150 to fix what they broke.

      These people are unindicted criminals, nothing less. Why would you put anything past a sociopathic organization?

    12. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      might, not night*. Correcting my typo AC, missed that one in preview.

    13. Re:XCP on steroids! by xmundt · · Score: 1, Troll

      Greetings and Salutations....
                I tend to agree about Sony....they used to be good, but, today? too many questionable decisions.

                On the other hand, the update DID increase the stability of the units. After all, what is more stabile than a brick?
                regards
                dave mundt

      --
      YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
    14. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people keep buying stuff from this company?

      Simple math, really. Allow me to explain:

      (Final Fantasy + Exclusivity Deals) * Obsessive Otaku = Profit!

      Sony's found a reliable definition for the ??? step, as you can see.

    15. Re:XCP on steroids! by Enderandrew · · Score: 0

      Sony doesn't force the update on anyone. You have to download it and install it yourself, agreeing to a legal disclaimer in the process.

      So technically, Sony didn't break it. You did.

      And if the console is still under warranty, they fix it. It it isn't under warranty, they charge. That is pretty standard as far as business practices go.

      The decent thing would be for Sony to do all these repairs for free if they can tell the console was bricked by the update. But Sony isn't being particularly worse than most companies here.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    16. Re:XCP on steroids! by pigphish · · Score: 1

      Crimes require intent. AKA a guilty mind (mens rea). I assume the majority of the updates were successful which would make it hard to prove they intentionally wanted to brick units to charge repairs.

      I wonder if just modified units were bricked (in Apple's grand tradition).

    17. Re:XCP on steroids! by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Probably because breaking someone's shit is normally a civil, not criminal issue.

      Extortion, on the other hand, would be - pay us or we will break your shit; not we broke your shit, now pay us.

    18. Re:XCP on steroids! by _avs_007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, sony broke it, because yeah, you have to agree to the license, but to not agree to the license, means you can't use your PS3 anymore, as the games won't run without the update being installed. You can call it user choice, but in reality it's a forced decision.

    19. Re:XCP on steroids! by Splab · · Score: 1

      They don't? Since when?

      A PS3 is effectively useless when it isn't up to date with latest greatest firmware. You are not allowed to sign in on the PS3 network without latest firmware, that means no online games, no software updates, no buying new games from the online store etc.

      Sony fucked up, they have to clean up their mess.

    20. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The rootkit Sony placed on their CDs and an update which bricks a percentage of current-gen consoles are two different beasts. As tech-oriented people we know what a rootkit is, how to find it, and why it's evil. The general public, for the most part, would have no idea that they were rooted silently when they put the CD in their drive. Rendering inoperable a current-gen console that is at the forefront of your business is something you can't miss, nor does it make sense. Yes, putting a rootkit on their albums was a sneaky and evil thing to do, but it makes a certain sense from an evil-business perspective. Burning and alienating your userbase in a blatant way that even the most technological unsavvy will notice does not make a bit of sense. Are they idiots for releasing a forced update that had potential to wreck systems? Yes. But your raging hate-on for all things Sony does not mean they did it deliberately, nor that a completely non-fuctioning console is the same as a silently-rooted PC.

    21. Re:XCP on steroids! by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >Sony doesn't force the update on anyone.

      Except that you can bet that new software/games will require that the update be present or it won't run.

      > And if the console is still under warranty, they fix it. It it isn't under warranty, they charge. That is pretty standard as far as business practices go. The decent thing would be for Sony to do all these repairs for free if they can tell the console was bricked by the update.

      Which is what Nintendo did when their 4.0 update hosed a large number of Wii consoles, including mine.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    22. Re:XCP on steroids! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1, Informative

      I haven't installed the update. I still play all my games just fine.

      There is no forced decision.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    23. Re:XCP on steroids! by Enderandrew · · Score: 0, Troll

      I haven't installed the 3.0 update. I just played my PS3 last night (MLB The Show). I watch movies on it just fine.

      My PS3 is far from useless.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    24. Re:XCP on steroids! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      here, here, i second that motion....no more Sony allowed!

    25. Re:XCP on steroids! by spire3661 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      AS much as I dislike Sony, Im not going to deny myself a fantastic piece of hardware for it. Im the one who loses, not really Sony. Now i probably wont buy a Sony TV, or pretty much anything else Sony, but the PS3 is a unique experience, with games that cant be had anywhere else.

      --
      Good-bye
    26. Re:XCP on steroids! by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

      according to the original linked article, it says the update is mandatory.

    27. Re:XCP on steroids! by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      A criminal case like this would have to show malice, otherwise its simply a civil matter.

      --
      Good-bye
    28. Re:XCP on steroids! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      As a PS3 owner who hasn't installed the 3.0 update, I can verify the article is wrong.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    29. Re:XCP on steroids! by Exlee · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not that bad. I bought some time ago NDS Lite. After a while screen calibration started to malfunction (well known problem). As I was in "not supported country" Nintendo haven't even respond for any of my e-mails. After 6 month I was left with piece of junk with no way of fixing it. So - what's left Microsoft? Come on..

    30. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      AS much as I dislike Sony

      That's funny, the rest of your post sounds very much like a Sony fanboi to me...

    31. Re:XCP on steroids! by spire3661 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Really? please point out the fanboisms. I said i like the PS3 but most likely wouldnt buy anything else from Sony. Considering I also own 2 360s, a Wii and a gaming PC, i dont really know how I could be a 'fanboi'. Thanks for your useless post though! :)

      --
      Good-bye
    32. Re:XCP on steroids! by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1

      Never thought I'd say this, but thanks AC. I went to lunch and you replied with just about exactly what I was trying to say in my original post.

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    33. Re:XCP on steroids! by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      Never ascribe to incompetence that which can be explained by greedy self-interest. Is it possible that this was deliberate? After all, they deliberately rooted thousands of PCs (inclusing mine) a few years ago, so you KNOW they're evil even by corporate standards, and they're charging $150 to fix a problem that their "update" caused.

      They won't brick MY PS3, because there's no way in hell I'll buy another product from the company that rooted my computer with a trojan in a music CD. Why do people keep buying stuff from this company? I won't -- once bitten, twice shy. Buy from Sony and you're asking to get screwed, with sand as lube.

      Hmm. I like Microsoft and I like Sony products (MS xbox/xbox360/xp/vista/7, and Sony PSP-1001/32"XBR6)... Part of me wants to see Sony and Microsoft corporations merge. You know, just to see the slurry of nerd rage on /.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    34. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's "Hear! Hear!" like you're saying to listen to the guy.
      hear/here

    35. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord. From the article you linked yourself:

      Sorry, it's not for a PlayStation 3, and it's not Sony's price, which is $38.40 if you buy direct in the US. (Still not a cheap screw.)

    36. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not always true - e.g. intoxication. Plus, ignorance of the law is not a defense.

    37. Re:XCP on steroids! by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0, Troll

      While it is probably an accident, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to learn that this was at least partially deliberate.

      Corporations and the sociopaths who run them will only become greedier and greedier, especially if left unchecked. Sony weren't punished for the rootkit fiasco and they obviously don't believe they will be punished for criminally negligent behavior such as skipping entire phases of testing and expecting their entire userbase to be unwitting beta-testers. This applies to the hardware as well as the software world, and I'll list the recent Peavey Vypyr Guitar amplifier as an example, because I bought one and taking it in to service fixed NOTHING. Posts like this, this, and this only scratch the surface.

      I dealt with this kind of crap even more intimately at my last job, but I didn't mind it so much then because it paid my bills and I didn't need any of the stuff I was fixing. So the particulars of the rant may be slightly off-base, but you shouldn't be the least bit surprised that corporations would try to get away with shit like that.

    38. Re:XCP on steroids! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Given that some PS3s might not even have a network connection, I fail to see how its mandatory. Maybe a few game in a few months will require that version of the firmware to play the game, but existing games will run just fine.

    39. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you'll use an OS with DRM rootkits built right in.

    40. Re:XCP on steroids! by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I might be fuzzy on the details, but wasn't the rooting thing the result of buying a 3rd party DRM solution? Yes, yes it was:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Copy_Protection
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaMax_CD-3

      Sony didn't build the software, nor do I think the intent was to damage PCs. Most likely, they fell to marketing hype from these companies claiming their copy protection systems couldn't be broken.

    41. Re:XCP on steroids! by sabre3999 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Update is mandatory to use the PSN or the store. Games still work fine, you just can't sign into services.

      That still doesn't excuse the fact that their update bricked the hardware... nor is it the first time. I seem to remember a story a few months ago where new updates were bricking the older, PSX/PS2 reverse-compatible models (I have one and avoided it.)

    42. Re:XCP on steroids! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1, Funny

      Really? please point out the fanboisms.

      No prob, here it is:

      AS much as I dislike Sony, Im not going to deny myself a fantastic piece of hardware for it. Im the one who loses, not really Sony. Now i probably wont buy a Sony TV, or pretty much anything else Sony, but the PS3 is a unique experience, with games that cant be had anywhere else.

      :)

      (Seriously, your post did come off as a fanboi.)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    43. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Sony we're talking about here. For the last few years they don't seem to have been operating real heavily in the realm of common sense.

    44. Re:XCP on steroids! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I haven't installed the update. I still play all my games just fine.

      No, you don't. Not if you're playing PS3 games. You have to update to play your games.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    45. Re:XCP on steroids! by 117 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't all new PS3 games check that you have a certain minimum firmware installed, and force you to update to that minimum before you can play the game? I.e. your current games may well work, but will newly released ones?

    46. Re:XCP on steroids! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can play existing games and existing Blu-ray movies, but there will come a new game or Movie that won't play. Additionally, you are locked out of all Online Activities.

      There is greatly reduced functionality if you are not running the latest firmware.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    47. Re:XCP on steroids! by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      let's not forget the screwed by sony part... sony pushed a "special" screw for 61+ euro when it was not special at all.

      You can't tell from the photo, but that screw has a rootkit built in! If you had used a normal screw, you'd be deprived of getting screwed twice.

    48. Re:XCP on steroids! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Except I am playing my PS3 games just fine without the update.

      Last night specifically I was playing MLB The Show.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    49. Re:XCP on steroids! by PRMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, that's racketeering!

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    50. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS3 is a unique experience, with games that cant be had anywhere else.

      Name one.

      No, really, name one. From what I can tell, the truth is exactly the opposite: the PS3 has a bunch of ports from the Xbox 360, and the Wii offers a unique experience with games that can't be had anywhere else.

      And don't try Metal Gear Solid 4. That's being ported to the Xbox 360.

      Likewise Final Fantasy XIII is coming out for the Xbox 360 before the PS3 in every territory except Japan. (Yay xenophobia.)

      Now if you want to name Xbox 360 exclusives, that includes Halo 3, Fable II, Gears of War 2, Saints Row, and a whole host of other AAA titles.

      Looking at the list of PS3 exclusives, I find Sega Golf Club, Wangan Midnight, and Derby Time Online. All of which are exclusive solely because they were never released outside of Japan. Yay?

    51. Re:XCP on steroids! by moredots · · Score: 0

      Just because it's posted on Slashdot doesn't make it true.

    52. Re:XCP on steroids! by dissy · · Score: 1

      Sony didn't build the software, nor do I think the intent was to damage PCs. Most likely, they fell to marketing hype from these companies claiming their copy protection systems couldn't be broken.

      OOOOHHHHH! Well yes, put that way, Sony is clearly the good guy here with no responsibility for the actions of the software they purchase/license/whatever and re-sold under their name!

    53. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Politicians call it "plausable deniability". I seriously doubt that any details on what the rootkit would do to a user's computer were withheld from Sony, including disabling all CD-burning software and P2P software. My daughter unwillingly installed XCP on my PC, never dreaming that a major corporation would be VANDALS.

      There's no way you'll convince me that Sony didn't know that XCP would disable P2P and CD burning software. That was its primary purpose, and it was nothing short of vandalism. Someone should have gone to prison for XCP.

    54. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Only at work.

    55. Re:XCP on steroids! by _avs_007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe they also do what nintendo does, and include the firmware update on the Game disc itself... My Wii doesn't have a network connection, yet it installs updates all the time when I get new games.

    56. Re:XCP on steroids! by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

      Do you play multiplayer online games? Cuz my PS3 will NOT allow me to play online unless I install updates

    57. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Probably because breaking someone's shit is normally a civil, not criminal issue.

      It may be a misdemeanor, but vandalism is a crime in my state.

    58. Re:XCP on steroids! by meyekul · · Score: 1

      I'd say those who paid 61 euro for a screw are the "special" ones.

    59. Re:XCP on steroids! by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Vandalism is destruction or defacement of common property, not personal property. While it could apply to kids tping your trees, this isn't really the situation this software update created.

      If Sony's update caused your PS3 to only display vulgar images, or teletubbies, or any other sort of eyesore, you might have a point.

      This update caused hardware damage, but the willful damage does not apply, as the user has to determine whether or not to update the software (the purpose of the update was not to damage hardware).

      Its the vandalism equivalent of someone walking through your neighborhood, asking you if you would like an egg to throw at your house, and then you throw it. The next day, they have a door cleaning service that doesn't get rid of the smell.

      Never mind, its nothing like vandalism.

    60. Re:XCP on steroids! by ozgood · · Score: 2, Informative

      To play games online you do have to update.

    61. Re:XCP on steroids! by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So - what's left Microsoft?

      The company that gave us the xbox360 red ring of death?

      Choose your poison, because its all poison.

      Me, I choose Nintendo, because at least they aren't trying to take control of my home media center the way sony and microsoft are. That and I've actually had postive experiences with their customer support. They replaced my Wii sports disc for nothing because it was scratched. They sent out those complimentary rubber shells for the wii remotes a few months after I purchased it. No company is perfect, but I find it hard to work up a real hate on for Nintendo. I don't even have to try for Sony or Microsoft.

    62. Re:XCP on steroids! by Fussen · · Score: 1

      I can understand that brick happens, and fixing bricked consoles is not profitable in the short run. The consumer can no longer consume Sony product; That's the situation ultimately.

      The PS3 firmware updates are approved and sometimes critical to the system as it is net-bound and privy to attacks as any other online system is. Somebody creates a bluetooth hack or some modded piece of spam breaches the some part of the XMB. Or lets just say Skype decides to change their setup. Sony has to be on top of this aside from their anti-piracy chase, which Sony is entitled to.

      If the consumer/end-user was just following the order of operations for the system and, had the end-user not received the new data that Sony approved/released, kept the system in working order then it is the Sony software that broke the system.

      Another PS3 of the same model, new or used, could be put into a controlled environment, updated with the 3.0 update and be rendered non-functional.The result is faulty software design that does not operate on all hardware revisions. But, since the end-user only has the choice of "Network Update", it's balls to the walls for Sony.

    63. Re:XCP on steroids! by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Before? Any proof of that?

    64. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't try Metal Gear Solid 4. That's being ported to the Xbox 360.

      No it's not, you're thinking of MGS: Rising, a cross-plat.

      Likewise Final Fantasy XIII is coming out for the Xbox 360 before the PS3 in every territory except Japan. (Yay xenophobia.)

      No, it's not. It's the same launch day across the board for all territories outside Japan.

      Now if you want to name Xbox 360 exclusives, that includes Halo 3, Fable II, Gears of War 2, Saints Row, and a whole host of other AAA titles.

      Lists, everybody! Get your lists! Can't have a fanboy war without your useless lists!

      Looking at the list of PS3 exclusives, I find Sega Golf Club, Wangan Midnight, and Derby Time Online. All of which are exclusive solely because they were never released outside of Japan. Yay?

      And I'm amazed you were able to find that many, with your head up your ass and all.

    65. Re:XCP on steroids! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "This applies to the hardware as well as the software world, and I'll list the recent Peavey Vypyr Guitar amplifier as an example, because I bought one and taking it in to service fixed NOTHING. Posts like this [peavey.com], this [peavey.com], and this [peavey.com] only scratch the surface."

      You might consider sticking with a good, old fashioned tube amp for the guitar...

      I gotta say, it actually took me a minute to figure it out on the posts you listed, I'd never thought of updating 'firmware' on a guitar amp.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    66. Re:XCP on steroids! by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      I hate Sony. As much as the next guy and more than a lot of guys.

      My copy of MetalGearSolid 4 cost me £300 because I had to buy some hardware to play it on too.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    67. Re:XCP on steroids! by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Sony doesn't force the update on anyone. You have to download it and install it yourself, agreeing to a legal disclaimer in the process.

      So technically, Sony didn't break it. You did.

      I agreed to the legal disclaimer before explicitly installing an update, which Sony encourages.

      I did not, however, choose nor agree to the ruin of my system. The disclaimer says absolutely nothing about rendering the system useless, nor does it issue any warning of the possibility. I simply follow Sony's protocol and now I'm stuck with exactly what was not advertised.

      Sony broke it.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    68. Re:XCP on steroids! by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Yes, they check and they also usually include a patch on the game disc so that non-networked PS3's can be updated to be compatible with said game. Other consoles do this as well.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    69. Re:XCP on steroids! by Khyber · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The article is bullshit. I have not updated my PS3. All of my games run. Of course, that might be because I don't allow it to connect to the internet.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    70. Re:XCP on steroids! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Nope. Every recent release I've gotten has not checked for a firmware revision. The most recent was Infamous.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    71. Re:XCP on steroids! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Valkyria Chronicles is PS3 only. Try spending at least 5 minutes in a GameStop or EBGames before opening your mouth next time, yea?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    72. Re:XCP on steroids! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Then you agreed to this:

      6. WARRANTY DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
      The System Software and the contents, programs, and services on or provided through the System Software, including Internet Features are provided "AS IS". SCE and its affiliated companies expressly disclaim any implied warranty of merchantability, warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and warranty of non-infringement.

      SCE AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES EXCLUDE ALL LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF PROFIT, OR ANY OTHER LOSS OR DAMAGE SUFFERED BY YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY, WHETHER DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL HOWEVER ARISING, AS A RESULT OF ACCESSING TO OR USING THE SYSTEM SOFTWARE OR ANY OF THE CONTENTS, PROGRAMS, FEATURES OR SERVICES ON OR PROVIDED THROUGH THE SYSTEM SOFTWARE. SO LONG AS THIS PROVISION IS ENFORCEABLE IN YOUR JURISDICTION, THE FOREGOING LIMITATIONS, EXCLUSIONS AND DISCLAIMERS SHALL APPLY TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS OF ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE.

      The decent thing for Sony to do is pay up. However, they may not be legally required to do so. I'm not a lawyer or a judge. However, Sony's business practices here aren't really unheard of. If you brick a motherboard because a BIOS doesn't flash correctly to the EEPROM, and your motherboard is out of warranty, then you're screwed.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    73. Re:XCP on steroids! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to malice, something that could be done via ignorance or incompetence. Here is what I figure probably happened:

      Sony Music Exec: Quick, we need copy protection.

      Sony Engineer: Can't do it that fast, but there's companies that can make it faster than we can.

      Sony Music Exec: Buy it and use it, ASAP.

      Sony Engineer: We should probably double check the software.

      Sony Music Exec: Not enough time, our media needs protection now! Use it!

      Sony Engineer: Okay, if you say so.

    74. Re:XCP on steroids! by Grendel70 · · Score: 1

      Yes but a previous poster was correct. If you purchase and try to play a new game, it will insist on upgrading your console before the game will play.

      --
      Perhaps you mean a different thing than I do when you say "science."
    75. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well since Nintendo recently released firmware 4.2, whose sole purpose was to attempt to eradicate homebrew software and brick peoples' innocent Wii consoles in the process, I wouldn't trust them either. They seemed alright with the Wii until they started destroying consoles with their stupidly untested and dangerous updates, and then trying to cover it up and pretend it wasn't widespread. The only consoles I buy now are the ones that can run custom firmware and homebrew without soldering because I suck at soldering. That way I can choose to ONLY install the custom firmwares and homebrew and not the official updates. For example: Wii, PSP, original Xbox, and NDS (with flash cart). The user experience tends to be much better than the locked-down DRM consoles without proper hax.

    76. Re:XCP on steroids! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      What is sad is that once upon a time they were THE electronics manufacturer if you wanted top drawer. remember the Walkman? Or the Trinitron? Now they are just another crappy company riding on their once good name. Used to be when you bought Sony you knew you had a top o' the line piece of electronics that would last.

      Now? Well at least i have Sony to than for getting me back into PC gaming in the mid 90s after they burned me on two PS1s, one of which lasted barely a year. Considering at the time they were nearly $300 that was when i just washed my hands of anything Sony. And my boys will be getting an x360 this year, as the 3 year warranty means they will have moved on before I worry about out of pocket repairs. $150 to fix their own bricking? That is just highway robbery! How sad that a once great hardware manufacturer has turned into such a crapstand. I personally blame the media division pushing DRM above design, as when it was just a hardware manufacturer you didn't see this kind of stupidity. Let me guess: is a good 90% of the "update" just pushing more DRM? Because frankly I wouldn't be surprised. I RTFA but it didn't say what this "update" actually did besides the bricking of course.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    77. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there is a forced decision. You're not as smart as you think.

      In order to get onto the PSN, you have to update your PS3 firmware to current versions. So, if someone wished to get onto the PSN, they were FORCED to install said update.

      Period.

    78. Re:XCP on steroids! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      My daughter unwillingly installed XCP on my PC, never dreaming that a major corporation would be VANDALS.

      Well, let's hope she's learned her lesson: get it from BitTorrent, since reputable warez groups have disinfected their releases. With all the Starforce, Securom and associated malware companies put on game disks nowadays, I'd never dare install anything I bought from a store. Get clean MP3s or disinfected ISOs, that's the safest option.

      Ironic, isn't it, that copy prevention makes getting the original the more dangerous option ?-)

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    79. Re:XCP on steroids! by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Uncharted, Killzone 2, GT5, Infamous, Time Crisis 4, Heavenly sword, Motostorm, Wipeout HD, Flower, Pixeljunk, Ratchet and Clank, Warhawk. Those are jsut the exclusives I own. I also have Halo 3, Gears of War 1 and 2, Shadowrun, both Fables, Project Gotham Racing 1-4, Ace Combat 6 and Perfect Dark Zero. The PS3 exclusives IN MY VERY HUMBLE OPINION, are overall the better games.

      --
      Good-bye
    80. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For shame, how could you forget Demon's Souls? Even notoriously-harsh-towards-PS3-exclusives Edge UK managed to give it a 9/10 as *the* dungeon crawler to have this generation. God I can't wait to pick it up. Not to mention Uncharted 2, neck-and-neck with Super Mario Galaxy as the highest-rated console exclusive. The 360 was hands-down the console to have at the start of this generation, but that lead has long since vanished.

    81. Re:XCP on steroids! by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      The CEOs of Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft's Xbox division need to be shot in the head. That wouldn't solve current problems, but I can guarantee the NEXT CEO will bend-over backwards not to piss off the customers -- purely out of fear.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    82. Re:XCP on steroids! by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Wrong division of Sony. SCEA isn't in the business of root-kitting PCs, since that's the other division. It's like blaming Microsoft Windows division for a shitty mouse. This sounds like a tempest in a teapot, since we've seen the same issue with Nintendo recently and somehow, some way, I'm sure there's going to be a class-action suit for that as well. This is nowhere CLOSE to the RRoD that plagues Microsoft to this day, or the infamous "Fall update" that bricked supposedly "thousands" of 360's...

      But it's fashionable to bash Sony because they're "Teh suck" right now.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    83. Re:XCP on steroids! by postmortem · · Score: 1

      they were specially screwed with that one.

    84. Re:XCP on steroids! by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Well as some fool told me just an hour ago (quoting from memory), "You can always buy blank CDs... but you're not entitled to own the software on that CD." He made that argument for why we can't sell used software like Autodesk, MS Word 2003, or Final Fantasy 12.

      The same stupid argument could be made by Sony in regards to the PS3, "You can always buy the blank hardware... but you don't own the software stored on that hardware. You only license the software."

      I said it before and I'll say it again - they are stripping-away our property rights.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    85. Re:XCP on steroids! by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I only mentioned current exclusives that i personally own. I too am counting the days to Uncharted 2. I was a bit disappointed when the demo came out and its just the same thing we had in the Beta testing. Was hoping for a single player demo like the first Uncharted had. As an aside, i used to work right next door to Atlus' U.S. division. Id chat with the devs when they came out for smokes from time to time, we shared a delivery alley.

      --
      Good-bye
    86. Re:XCP on steroids! by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>So technically, Sony didn't break it. You did.

      Yes but they said the downloaded firmware would work, which is an implied warranty. The frakkers are responsible for any damage caused, just as surely as my mechanic is responsible if his "updates" break my car.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    87. Re:XCP on steroids! by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Every recent release I've gotten has not checked for a firmware revision

      Maybe because you already had the latest revision? On my PSP when I bought the Final Fantasy 7 prequel, it checked the version number and refused to let me play until I updated the firmware. That would make it a forced upgrade (you can't return an opened game). If Sony uses that tactic for the PSP, it makes sense they'd do the same for the PS3.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    88. Re:XCP on steroids! by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>>The decent thing for Sony to do is pay up. However, they may not be legally required to do so

      My understanding of the law, based upon the results from the Paypal case, is that agreements do not overrule State or National Law. You might sign an agreement that says "no warranty provided" but the consumer protection laws would nullify that agreement as invalid, and force the manufacturer to replace the broken hardware, or else face massive government-imposed fines.

      And if that doesn't work, the customers can organize a boycott of all Sony products from now to the end of time.
      Sony might end-up the same place Circuit City is now.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    89. Re:XCP on steroids! by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Crimes require intent

      False. You never heard of manslaughter? That's when somebody does not intentionally kill another human being, but they still get convicted for the crime. In this case Sony is guilty of violating an implied warranty of merchantability. Intent is irrelevant.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    90. Re:XCP on steroids! by countach · · Score: 1

      I think is is more referring to other damages you might incur, external to the equipment itself.

      In any case, there are limits to what you can exclude. You can't have a parking garage, put up a disclaimer, and then take an axe to your customer's cars. That's outside of a reasonable expectation. If Sony bricked consoles with the update, they are not only morally responsible, but my guess is legally responsible, regardless of the disclaimer.

    91. Re:XCP on steroids! by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe it is Microsoft.

      I'm not a gamer. I don't own any of the consoles. (My stepson has a Wii and PS3 but I don't touch them.)

      My understanding, largely from Slashdot, is that Microsoft has really stepped up and taken responsibility for their problems. Did I misunderstand?

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    92. Re:XCP on steroids! by Marful · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because when I bought my PS3 or video game, no where did I sign a contract stating that I agreed to be limited by any conditions...

      Given the absence of a binding contract, I guess First Sale Doctrine comes into play? And that means I own the hardware and whatever is in it. I don't necessarily have rights to make reproduce and distribute, but I definitely own the physical object and what it contains.


      EULA's don't mean shit unless they are agreed upon at the time of transfer of ownership as a contingency of the exchange.


      (IANAL BTW...)

    93. Re:XCP on steroids! by mikael · · Score: 1

      The price charged by Nextronics for LCD screen repairs is even worse. They charge you something like $2600 to $3200 for a new screen, but if you part exchange it, they give you half price (motherboards are the same). Except of course, if you were to buy the LCD screen (Hitachi 17") it would be around $400 from the hardware supplier.

      The hard disks drives are even worse. For a new 250 GB laptop hard disk drive, it would cost you around $2500

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    94. Re:XCP on steroids! by sjames · · Score: 1

      Some things can't be legally disclaimed, no matter who signs what. This is likely one of those things.

      As for being no worse than other companies, that doesn't make their behaviour any more acceptable, it just means they're not the only boil on society's butt.

    95. Re:XCP on steroids! by stuboogie · · Score: 1

      "And if the console is still under warranty, they fix it. It it isn't under warranty, they charge. That is pretty standard as far as business practices go."

      I don't care if my console is under warranty or not. If the manufacturer supplies a firmware update that is in all essence mandatory (You have to upgrade or do without online services or playing any new games that require that particular firmware) and that update breaks my system, then I expect them to fix it at no cost as a minimum. There should also be some sort of compensation for their screw up that caused the consumer a hassle.

      Look at it this way, if a cellphone service provider required an update to their software that bricked your cellphone, do you think it is OK that they charge you to replace your phone??? (I'm not talking about hacked phones) Of course by your reason, you could just disconnect from the service and not install the update. You could still use all the offline features of your phone, just not make any calls or use any data services. But that kind of makes the cellphone pointless then doesn't it? Same difference with a PS3.

      I consider the approach that Sony is taking to definitely be "worse than most companies." You can rightly bash MS for their 360 hardware screw ups, but at least they cover the issues at no charge, cover shipping, extend the warranty AND provide free XBox Live time as compensation. That doesn't make their problems magically go away, but at least they are taking responsibility for it and providing a reasonable response rather than a big F*ck You to all their customers.

      Sony's arrogance keeps growing as they continue to screw over their customers and fanbois like you just keep defending them. Just check out the new PSP that is more limited in functionality than the first version. Nice job Sony!!! Yeah, If I owned a PSP, I would like to be able to play the games I own on the new version. I guess Sony doesn't feel that is a necessary feature. I guess they have the same philosophy as with the PS2 compatibility on PS3: You can just keep your old PS2 plugged in and cluttering up your entertainment system. Why not carry around TWO PSPs!!!!

    96. Re:XCP on steroids! by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1

      Microsoft was sued as well about the ring but apparently (I have no source on this but saw this as a comment on ars.) there was already a plan in place but execution was dependent on selling the idea to take a huge loss to share holders so that MS could actually survive as company later on. I repeat this is 9th hand information I make no claim about its accuracy.

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    97. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I was in "not supported country" Nintendo haven't even respond for any of my e-mails.

      Why should they? If they've stated their support policy, and it excludes your country, how is that a problem? As you state that they've not responded to any of your emails, you either knew in advance that they'd not support it in your country and bought it anyway, or learned it after the fact, not having determined its support status before buying it - neither of which is Nintendo's fault.

      And they call Americans whiners...

    98. Re:XCP on steroids! by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1

      to be more clear: ...plan in place -to fix the consoles -

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    99. Re:XCP on steroids! by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1

      When your unable to play certain games and movies (Uncharted was mentioned) unless you update the firmware then they are in fact forcing it on you through indirect means.

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    100. Re:XCP on steroids! by shentino · · Score: 1

      I've heard of the first sale doctrine being dodged on SOFTware...

      But the day the courts let companies pull that bullshit on tangible goods is the day that pigs will fly so high they'll get a bad enough sunburn to have bacon rain from heaven.

    101. Re:XCP on steroids! by shentino · · Score: 1

      Are you sure the PS3 doesn't phone home and force itself to either update or brick?

      I imagine there might, just might, be circuitry inside the box that forces it to quit working if it's gone long enough without checking for new updates.

    102. Re:XCP on steroids! by shentino · · Score: 1

      Intentional damage to property is also known as vandalism regardless if you aggravate it by trying to charge to fix it.

      Some bozo comes onto my property and starts tearing shit up with a sledgehammer, I can have him arrested even if he offers to have it professionally repaired at no charge.

    103. Re:XCP on steroids! by pigphish · · Score: 1

      I am afraid you are incorrect. Intent is very relevant for crimes.

      If someone kills someone accidentally, say for example in a car accident they are not guilty of a crime (for example someone jay walking and jumping in front of your car). However, if someone kills someone while drunk driving or say robbing a bank, they are. This is the gray area that exists but basically in the 2 latter situations it would be criminal and the punishment would be penal NOT civil or monetary (though you can have a civil penalty as well). A mens rea (guilty mind) standard is applied which goes to intent.

      Furthermore, the implied warranty is uniform commercial code and NOT criminal. There is no penalty of loss of freedom (ie jail) in the UCC and neither should there be.

    104. Re:XCP on steroids! by shentino · · Score: 1

      Knowingly sending you a bricking update is no different from them sending you a trojan horse...in fact that's exactly what it is.

      The "purpose" of the update notwithstanding, if Sony willfully misrepresented the contents of the update, then any user consent is void.

      Following the "egg" analogy, it's more like someone drilling a hole in an egg and filling it with limburger cheese, then asking you if they can throw the "egg" at your house.

    105. Re:XCP on steroids! by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      I think it's the other way around, never ascribe evilness that which can be explained by incompetence. Sony may be evil, but its most likely incompetence.

    106. Re:XCP on steroids! by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Brick happens.

      Especially when they are too cheap to include a backup ROM -- even a little bitty one.

      Hey, how long did it take PC manufacturers to include a dual BIOS? How many still don't? My newest mobo has a backup ROM, but holding my breath during a flash was a regular practice for many years.

    107. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grats on getting rooted.

      Y'know, despite the fact that you're a fucking liar.

    108. Re:XCP on steroids! by selven · · Score: 1

      It's an infinite duration rental!


      Buy PS3 Now! Only $199!!! Own a PS3 in your home!

    109. Re:XCP on steroids! by selven · · Score: 1

      I hope the entire world thinks like that.

      Signed,

      Every evil company executive in the world.

    110. Re:XCP on steroids! by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      Mens rea must still be demonstrated however, at least under English common law. Murder was defined very recently as requireing "malice aforethought" and if you intended "only" to do for example grevious harm but killed them by mistake, it was still murder. Intent is important in every crime unless it;s one fo the number of low level crimes of strict liability such as speeding where there is no requirement to prove mens rea.

    111. Re:XCP on steroids! by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

      Interesting. But if they want to claim it's licenced, that's pretty much the same thing as saying you are renting/leasing it from them.

      Any landlord is obligated to fix problems with a tenants building for normal wear and tear, and for the landlords screw ups.

      In other words, if Sony, or any other jackass company wants to start claiming you "license" their hardware, they damn well better start paying for all maintenance, broken controllers or other replacement parts, cleanings, what have you.

    112. Re:XCP on steroids! by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with warranty, and everything to do with liability.

      In the grand old tradition, let's imagine a car. You've just bought it new, with a two year warranty. After three years, the alternator fails. Does your warranty cover that? Of course not, even though an alternator should last a lot longer.

      But that's not the situation here. Imagine that, after those three years, you take your car back to the dealership for maintenance. Shortly thereafter, the alternator fails because the maintenance was done improperly.

      Is the dealership obligated to fix it at their expense now? You better believe they are. Regardless of "warranty" or not, they caused the damage and are therefore responsible to repair it.

      And if they tried to include on their standard repair form "Not responsible for any damage occurring during repairs", they'd find out just how little such a "disclaimer" means. That is true especially if Sony continued to offer the defective firmware after receiving quite a few reports of it being defective, which it seems they did.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    113. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Vandalism is destruction or defacement of common property, not personal property.

      [citation needed] Oh, here's one: "Private citizens commit vandalism when they willfully damage or deface the property of others or the commons"

      Where did you get the idea that private property can't be vandalized?

      While it could apply to kids tping your trees, this isn't really the situation this software update created.

      More like kids bricking your windows.

      Its the vandalism equivalent of someone walking through your neighborhood, asking you if you would like an egg to throw at your house, and then you throw it.

      No, it's more like the bank saying they won't foreclose your house if you throw a brick through the window. They did indeed vandalize my computer with the trojan they put on a music CD that my daughter installed. The game system bricking is just as bad or worse. Whether or not it's vandalism depends on if they knew it would damage equipment, and it seems that even a minimal amount of testing would have shown its destructive properties. Seeing's how they're charging to fix what they themselves broke, and in light of Sony's past behavior, I believe they DID know it would damage property.

    114. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to malice, something that could be done via ignorance or incompetence

      I don't believe in that maxim. I say never attribute to stupidity anything that can be attributed to greedy self-interest.

    115. Re:XCP on steroids! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't say they were the good guy, because they clearly didn't do their homework. At the same time, I'm sure the companies made it sound much less intrusive than it actually would be. I doubt Sony cares if their competitors cds are ripped off, only the ones that they are paying to protect. But those companies probably did a lot of lying through omission.

    116. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Wrong division of Sony

      If I shoot you holding the gun in my right hand, when they execute me my left hand dies, too. Sony is a single company with a board of directors and a CEO. They are responsible for anything that happens in any division.

      Whether I get a defective Microsoft Mouse or a defective Excel, Steve Ballmer's still in charge. I don't care what division made it, it's the same company and "it was a different division" doesn't excuse the company the division is part of.

      But it's fashionable to bash Sony because they're "Teh suck" right now.

      Sony rooted my computer when my daughter installed the XCP trojan. AFAIC they're "teh suck" until the company is dead and gone, and have been since the Sony-produced malware..

    117. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Hanlon's razor is indeed the other way around, but it is far less logical than my maxim. If someone benefits from his own "screwup" I'm going to believe that it was NOT an accident.

    118. Re:XCP on steroids! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The same is also true of the Wii and the Xbox 360. It's more true for online play though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    119. Re:XCP on steroids! by brkello · · Score: 1

      Say what you will...at least they did the right thing and said they would repair it for 3 years. Not even Nintendo is doing that. And I didn't choose Nintendo because they don't really have a very good game line-up other than their first party titles (which has been a common them for awhile with them).

      My second console with be a PS3 because it is a cheap blu-ray player. I think the only way I would have gotten a Wii is if I had small children.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    120. Re:XCP on steroids! by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 1

      Actually, you often times CAN return an opened game, it's just a hassle. EA sports pissed me off with Madden 10 for xbox, I emailed them and told them it was shitty and I wanted my money back. They told me to send it in under warranty status within 30 days for an unopened replacement copy which I would then be able to take back to Walmart for a refund.

    121. Re:XCP on steroids! by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Say what you will...at least they did the right thing and said they would repair it for 3 years.

      That certainly wasn't their FIRST reaction.

      And I didn't choose Nintendo because they don't really have a very good game line-up other than their first party titles (which has been a common them for awhile with them).

      While from my point of view there isn't all that much out for the xbox (or ps3) that is that exciting isn't out for the PC.

      I think the only way I would have gotten a Wii is if I had small children.

      Its definitely the best of the bunch for small kids. Its also better for most couples, and at parties and family events. My wife will play Wii tennis with me... she won't play halo.

      My second console with be a PS3 because it is a cheap blu-ray player.

      If I buy another console it will be a PS3 for that reason. But I'm not all that impressed with blu-ray. I don't think its worth the premium price over a decent upscaled DVD. I don't like the DRM. I don't like Sony. I care more about plot and dialog than pixels, and i can lose myself in an SDTV broadcast movie just as easily as a 1080p bluray. If I'm watching for the clarity of the picture, the movie's not doing a good job of holding my interest...

    122. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony AND Microsoft taking control of your home media center? you are putting them in the same boat? do you even HAVE a PS3? i don't know about you but i'm enjoying streaming content from my server to my TV so easily with mediatomb/fuppes. That's taking control? Did your TV do that by itself to begin with? How did you do this before?

    123. Re:XCP on steroids! by kramerd · · Score: 1

      First of all, that's not a citation; you don't attribute the original source. You just put quotations around words and emboldened what you wanted to be a counter-argument.

      Secondly, googling your "citation" shows it to be from Wikipedia, so no basis for believing that either.

      Third, I get the idea that private property can't be vandalized because it actually can't. Spray painting a tree in your yard is very different from spray painting a McDonalds. Same action = different level of crime (civil vs criminal). When its private property, we call it trespassing and destruction of property, not vandalism. Before you fly off the handle here, corporations are persons for financial purposes only; it should be obvious that McDonald's cannot be forced to perform community service or take an anger management class or serve time in prison (nor would be appropriate, even if it could).

      By kids bricking your windows, I assume you mean throwing bricks at them; which is absurd, because no one would ever let kids throw bricks at their windows.

      If you are talking about Windows software, you would have to let them onto your computer (not necessarily directly, but you would still have to give them direct permission to brick your windows) in order for it to be equivalent, and those kids would have to not know that the actions they were taking would do something to your hardware. On the other hand, this still wouldn't be vandalism.

      Your writing skills are atrocius. I had to reread your post a couple of times to realize that you didn't mean that the bank vandalized your computer with a trojan on a music cd.

      Nevermind that your daughter installed a trojan because you did not have adequate security on your computer, but even if a representative of SONY had walked into your house, personally installed a trojan on your computer, and had you sign for it, it still would not be vandalism.

      Testing only shows a theoretical model of real world use. In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.

      SONY BMG (not just SONY) rootkit was not done to damage computers. It was a form of copy protection (the validity of copy protection is an unrelated debate) that did not work as intended. SONY BMG recalled all affected cd's when it was clear that malware could take advantage of an exploit that resulted from the copy protection employed. The copy protection itself did not damage your computer. On the other hand, prior to this, the same issues had existed on cds released in europe years beforehand, only in europe there were no warning labels.

      Thank you for capitalizing 'did' in your last sentence; without that I would not have been able to determine your opinion on whether SONY learns from past behavior. After all, since the SONY BMG rootkit fiasco seemed to have helped sales in both the short and long term, they must have been repeating it here. Especially since electronics companies tend to stick around when they screw over customers repeatedly and knowingly.

      No wait, none of the previous paragraph is true.

    124. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      First of all, that's not a citation; you don't attribute the original source

      That was an "oops" I didn't catch in the preview; I linked Wikipedia but forgot to paste the URL in.

      Spray painting a tree in your yard is very different from spray painting a McDonalds.

      First, McDonalds is private property (as opposed to a school or courthouse or park), and spray painting someone's house is exactly the same as spray painting a McDonalds. If I catch you spray painting my house, you'll go to jail; it is NOT a civil matter.

      Your writing skills are atrocius

      Considering how many people have praised my writing in my journals, and begged me to publish thenm in a book, I rather suspect it's your reading skills that fall somewhat short.

      Testing only shows a theoretical model of real world use.

      The machines are all identical; putting the patch on them and finding that the DVD no longer works would be a real-world hint.

      SONY BMG (not just SONY) rootkit was not done to damage computers.

      Part of the damage was to bork P2P software and CD burner software. That was certainly deliberate, and illegal. It went far and beyond anything any rational person would call DRM. And the BMG division is part of Sony; the division heads report to the CEO, who IMO should be in prison. If I'd done to one of their computers what they did to mine, I'd be in prison.

    125. Re:XCP on steroids! by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      The rootkit thing is widely misunderstood, which is somewhat Sony's fault for their name branding on all their divisions...

      For one, Sony BMG paid a company to implement a protection scheme on their CDs. This is kind of like if a movie studio licensed Macrovision protection and it broke someone's VCR, so everyone boycotts the studio.

      Also, Sony is kind of like a single company keiretsu, so boycotting Sony Computer Entertainment Japan because Sony BMG music did something you don't like is kind of like boycotting Mitsubishi Motors because you got a Nikon camera that messed up for you. For all intents and purposes, they're different companies, and believe me, Sony is woefully bad at communicating between silos, as you see in the feature gap between portable music players and handheld game systems.

    126. Re:XCP on steroids! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The rootkit thing is widely misunderstood

      Indeed; it was MUCH worse than the press described it. There's no way I'll believe that Sony didn't know that XCP would disable all P2P software, all CD burning software, and all install programs that installed that software.

      It even disabled the software that came with my CD burner.

      Sony is woefully bad at communicating between silos

      That's nobody's fault but Sony's.

    127. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never seen a company with better customer service than Nintendo.

      Now if they would only drop the DSlite repair price, I would send it in.

    128. Re:XCP on steroids! by JLF65 · · Score: 1

      But I'm not all that impressed with blu-ray. I don't think its worth the premium price over a decent upscaled DVD. I don't like the DRM. I don't like Sony. I care more about plot and dialog than pixels, and i can lose myself in an SDTV broadcast movie just as easily as a 1080p bluray. If I'm watching for the clarity of the picture, the movie's not doing a good job of holding my interest...

      If you're not impressed, your TV isn't good enough. :) Also, non-HiDef TV can just as often destroy your interest in a movie - some movies have points of interest in the fine details... details that are lacking in DVDs. For example, how about Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet where he's doing the soliloquy with the soldiers in the background bound for Poland. On a DVD, you can't tell what it is in the background until he mentions it in the soliloquy. In many movies, the actors often read something that is legible in the movie theater, but too blurry to read on the DVD... and you miss an important plot point. BluRay is VERY impressive, and most BDs are the same price as DVDs, or only $5 more in a few cases. Granted, I still buy DVDs when it doesn't make a difference (like Shin-chan), but certain movies NEED to be watched on BD for the best experience.

    129. Re:XCP on steroids! by metaforest · · Score: 1

      Sony and Nintendo aren't the only ones who have botched their firmware update processes.

      http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10368709-56.html

      While Microsoft/Danger has not made any statements regarding the root cause that took out all sidekick users in North America last week, it is curious that it happened right as word was circulating that the LX 2009 model was do for an OTA update.... hmmm thats interesting.

      http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2009/10/02/firmware-update-for-buggy-sidekick-lx-2009-on-its-way/

      It's now been almost a week since the outage started and there are still thousands of LX 2009 owners that have missing email, phonebooks, and notes. T-Mobile sent out an urgent message to users last weekend warning sidekick owners NOT to hardware reset their phones. What many Sidekick owners I know experienced was their phones were reset remotely by either Microsoft/Danger or T-Mobile Friday morning when the outage began. Adding insult to injury, one friend noted that her Sidekick has been hardware reset remotely now no less than 10 times since the outage began. Additionally, while her network service has been restored, the phone is behaving worse than it ever had before the outage.

      While I am no expert on how the Sidekick works I can make some observations based on comments my friend and other have made about their experiences last weekend:

      1. The LX 2009 appears to silently store phonebook and other user generated information, and preferences in volatile RAM, rather than the Sim card or Flash. This appears to be a default configuration.
      2. While both T-Mobile reps and glossy into claims the SideKick stores personal info either on Microsoft/Danger's servers and/or on the user's SIM card, my friend was unable to find any preference settings on the phone relating to this feature.

      3. Maybe this is a sign that cloud services are a bad idea for storing mission critical information. For many people their address/phonebook ARE mission critical.
      4. Microsoft/Danger and T-Mobile may be due for a massive class action here. The sad thing is that my friend has been very happy with T-Mobile's service for years. From what she tells me the failure of the sidekick LX 2009s in North America rests squarely on Microsoft/Danger's shoulders.

      5. Back in May there were strong indications that Microsoft gutted the Sidekick development team shortly after the LX 2009 was shipped... http://www.zimbio.com/Sidekick+3+Ringtones/articles/171/Microsoft+Lays+Off+Danger+Employees
      Could it be that Microsoft has backstabbed Sidekick owners to finish killing off the platform? By cutting internal support for critical Danger services it could easily be written off as a terrible mistake. Microsoft would clearly have good reason to take a plausibly deniable swipe at T-Mobile for forcing them to make the last Sidekick.... Other possible causes might include disgruntled ex-employee sabotage of the Danger back-end...

      How does a mission critical server, owned by the largest software company in the world get taken out so completely that it takes 5 full days to bring it back up? I could see this being an accident for a small startup with weak IT processes, but at Microsoft? Something doesn't add up.

      Back to Sony for a moment:

      It seems unlikely that Sony intended to brick PS3's with this update, but on the other hand all of the console makers tend to treat their customers like indentured licensees... so outcomes like this are sure to occur more often until some serious lawyering and lawmaking gets invoked.

      My hunch is that these issues are going to get a lot worse before they get better.

    130. Re:XCP on steroids! by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Perhaps division isn't the right word, and your gun analogy isn't even close to how Sony operates (or any large conglomerate does for that matter). Comparing Sony to Microsoft doesn't illustrate effectively how the company's laid out. (Sony music is partially owned by Bertlesmann (sp?) so you KNOW where that rootkit came from initially). Sony makes devices to copy music, yet their music division actively tries to prevent that. They make DVD writers, but they have a movie arm that tries to prevent copying of DVD movies. that's different than MSFT (mostly in scale, but also on hierarchy), but even if it were just a larger version of MSFT, you can't say (with a straight face) the Windows division has control and say over how the keys get laid out on the hardware side of MSFT... which is what you're implying with the rootkit. You're implying that because the banner of "Sony" covers both, SCEA had something to do with compromising your windows box. That is absurd.

      Yes, buying a PS3 can "enable" Sony music (indirectly) to root windows computers still, but the same holds true for buying a MSFT mouse "enabling" MSFT to ass-rape you with a shitty OS. Life's too short to worry about this sort of thing, which is why I stopped using Windows years ago. But you can have the company be dead to you, no argument from me. What I take issue with is the blanket statement trying to connect two wildly different things (and disparate parts of the company) as a reason to hate an entity. It undermines your position, IMHO.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    131. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brick happens.

      Only with poor/cheap hardware design. They should at the very least include a basic flash recovery mode that can flash firmware from a CD/memory card for when the firmware is corrupted.

    132. Re:XCP on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Valkyria Chronicles is shit. But don't take my word for it, try Zero Punctuation's.

      The only thing the game had going for it is the art style. Which is generic anime. But in HD, I guess.

      And, yes, I've played the demo.

  2. A few questions about this by nebaz · · Score: 1

    I have a 60 GB PS3, hardware compatible PS2 mode, but I don't use it very often, partially because it runs hot, but partially because I am doing other things. When did this update come out, and if I try to update now, will they have fixed the problem?

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:A few questions about this by Coldeagle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the same model and didn't run into any issues; however, I waited until the next upgrade. I always wait and see if my console will get bricked before doing any firmware updates ;)

      As far as the console getting to hot, I picked up a cooling station for the PS3 and it has helped keep it running cooler (if not more quietly). Also be sure you've got enough airspace for proper ventilation.

    2. Re:A few questions about this by grahamwest · · Score: 1

      I have the backwards compatible version with hardware GS and software EE and it's fully up to date with patches and the PS2 compatibility works fine. Just played through Ico and Shadow Of The Colossus (which is perhaps the most demanding PS2 game ever made) last weekend.

      --
      Graham
    3. Re:A few questions about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be coincidental, but my 3.0 updated 60gb PS3 is now unusable (as of this weekend) due to Video Corruption (the brief 10s it works after being off for hours) and flat out no video the rest of the time. The thing missing from the article is the common "symptoms". The only thing I've found is "sustained hardware damage".

      Just wondering if I should repair/replace my PS3 or hold off on the outcome of this lawsuit.

    4. Re:A few questions about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bin it and buy an Xbox360, at least MS admit their fuck ups and pay for repairs.

    5. Re:A few questions about this by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Does SOTC still have insane drops to 6FPS on the PS3?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:A few questions about this by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should check your video cable connections before complaining about Sony?

      And then perhaps do the full poweroff reset trick? (hold the power button for 5 seconds when you turn it on.

    7. Re:A few questions about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I spent a full day troubleshooting the damned thing. Maybe you should learn to read before hitting reply?

      The issue was *Video Corruption*. The full power off reset trick only works for *No Video*. And yes, I tried it. Literally about a dozen times to make sure I was doing it correctly (you actually have to power it on, power it off, *then* hold the power button then you get 1 beep, and then 2 quick beeps, then you let go immediately). I fully diss-asembled and cleaned the unit, applied new thermal grease to the chips before re-attaching the heatsink (the old ceramic based thermal grease was falling apart). Still the unit only works for no more than 15s (if at all) before the video gets all corrupt and the system freezes (you know, like when the fan on a video card fails, or a video card is otherwise overheating).

      Video Corruption is a sign of the RSX chip being damaged (or getting overheated). Nothing short of replacing the motherboard or sending the unit to Sony (to replace the whole motherboard) will fix it. And before you say it, a reflow won't work either. It's well documented that although reflows will fix YLOD, it will not work for failing RSX chips (corrupt graphics / no video). Keep in mind that this is a unit that was in a huge, well ventilated shelf all by itself, connected to a UPS and barely used and highly pampered.

    8. Re:A few questions about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should ask for console hardware advice on a more appropriate site?

      Seriously, what the fuck? This is a Sony-hostile site full of whiny bitches. I don't go to the Ford forums to get advice on a Volkswagen for the exact same reason.

    9. Re:A few questions about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to read, when was GP asking for advice? He was simply stating how he may have been affected by this 3.0 *SONY* PS3 firmware bug (which GGP accused him of not troubleshooting properly which he did). I would think a story about PS3s failing after the 3.0 update would be a good place to post a comment about ones own PS3 failing after the 3.0 update.

      Troll much?

  3. Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by stox · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had the misfortune of buying one of their GPS units. Despite the fact that their support clearly acknowledged the defects the unit had from the day of purchase, Sony did not release a fix until 7 months later. Sony insists that I pay $99.95 to get that update. Needless to say, I no longer will buy Sony products.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by AioKits · · Score: 1

      For me Sony stopped being a reputable vendor when a stereo given to me as a present a few years ago ceased to function after only 4 months of light use (read 30min to an hour a day). It wasn't even a very complex system.

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    2. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony WAS reputable?

      Sha.... i don't believe it.

    3. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by wizardforce · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sony stopped being a reputable vendor the moment they infected people's electronics with their very own trojan. From there it all went down hill. It is disgusting that Sony can issue a patch that they know know to be faulty and then actually charge people to fix the damage that Sony created in the first place. Someone get a class action lawsuit together and sue these crooks.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    4. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frak me...

    5. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by SQLz · · Score: 0, Troll

      What happens when eventually, every electronic device you owns fail and they won't repair it for free? Will you stop using electronic devices? I had a Sony TV that lasted for 13 years and it recently broke, I'll never buy that company again!!!

    6. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That can happen to anybody - all vendors have some lemons. The question is, how many and how do they handle it when they sold you something with a problem? A good vendor will take care of it to the best of their ability and leave you with as little problems as possible - a bad vendor will ignore you.

      I got an outdated DPT RAID controller from a friend a decade ago. It had problems cooperating with my BIOS - it would only boot correctly (exactly) every second time, or something like that. Not something that was a big deal to me, and the card was about five years old at that time (and I was not the original owner). However, I sent them an email to just ask if they had a solution. They immediately (as in same day, and without me asking for it) sent me new firmware chips by Fedex. Shipping came to $70 - more than the card was worth on the second hand market.

      I've had other vendors that have driven out in the middle of the night with replacement servers when I suspected that there was a problem with one of the servers they'd delivered.

      It's not the failure - it's the failure to handle the failure.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    7. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by dOxxx · · Score: 1

      What happens when eventually, every electronic device you owns fail and they won't repair it for free? Will you stop using electronic devices? I had a Sony TV that lasted for 13 years and it recently broke, I'll never buy that company again!!!

      There's a difference between 4 months and 13 years...

    8. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends. Was the vendor the one who broke the device?

    9. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by dOxxx · · Score: 1

      Meh, 7 months not 4 months.

    10. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      That's completely different and you know it.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Believe it. Back when they were cranking out Walkmans and Discmans Sony actually had a great reputation for reliable hardware. It wasn't until about 8-10 years ago or so that their reputation fell into decline rapidly. I used to buy Sony stereo equipment, and still have an old Sony DVD player that works great, but i would hesitate before buying anything with the Sony brand on it today.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    12. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Schickeneder · · Score: 2, Funny

      For me Sony stopped being a reputable vendor when a stereo given to me as a present a few years ago was stolen.

    13. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Yeah they are.

      I love their stuff. Sleek, light and powerful laptops, fantastic looking consumer electronics. Never had a problem with any of it myself.

      The fact that sony music screwed up with the rootkit debacle is a shame, but as a linux user I don't really care.

    14. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by notknown86 · · Score: 1

      PS1 - Bricked, stopped reading discs. Trinitron Television - Switched to black and white while playing certain games on said Playstation, until it eventually stopped working. K750i - Joystick broken. Replacement K750i - Joystick broken. ...and then, I stopped buying Sony. The End.

    15. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by thisisaccount2 · · Score: 1

      RTFA?
      RTFS?
      RTF Title?

      Please?

    16. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This happened to me also, and also with a DPT raid controller...

      I just asked for a firmware update to try to sort out some instabilities... and my surprise when they asked me my address to send them for free...

      From US to Portugal!!! ;)

    17. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to look at their hardware as the top of the market (not computers). They still make great TVs, but I will never buy one simply because of the way that the rest of the business is run.

      Sony is anti-consumer, and I am now happily anti-Sony.

    18. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      I have an original PS2, 1st gen, bought on Launch day. It still works great. Not that I play it very much now a days, but it makes a nice DVD player in the Bedroom.

      I bought a used PSP, again 1st Gen. Still works great, no pixel problems, all buttons work, just had to replace the Battery once.

      I have a PS3 80gb with PS2 emu, still works great. Not everyone has these problems.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    19. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Exactly why I brought up the comment about my Wii.
      Anecdotal evidence isn't worth anything.

      The original revisions of the PS, PS2, and PSP were crap in terms of reliability.

      The 360 is an utter failure.

      Nintendo products are very reliable.

      These are simple truths that can be verified through many forms of data collection.

    20. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      early model PS1's were known for their low quality disc mechanisms. It's not a "Bricking" but mechanical failure.

    21. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by anethema · · Score: 1

      A device which can serve no other function than to be a door stop, and cannot be repaired without total disassembly or being sent to the manufacturer is said to be bricked.

      Does the PS1 have any other useful abilities once the disk drive is dead? If not, this fits handily into the proper use of the word 'Bricked'.

      Unlike the common usage out there today 'Does not work until I hit a 'Restore' button or plug it into a computer'

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    22. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Meh. PS1 - still works fine. Trinitron PC Monitor - worked fine for years. Only got rid of it because it was 15" and LCDs got cheaper. P200 digital camera - put down on sand which got in the gears and stopped the lens from shutting - replaced. Replacement P200 - still works fine. Older P180(?) digital camera - dropped in a glass of water; still works fine.

      I can understand all the anti-sonyism but everything they've sold me has worked fine.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    23. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Cowclops · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm aware from reading in context, bricking usually means "failure due to a firmware replacement that also prevents the firmware from being further replaced."

      Like, you update your firmware on the PS3, then it decides to completely fail to boot or anything... and you can't update the firmware because you need working firmware in place to do that. BRICKED.

      I don't consider mechanical failure to be "bricked" though an argument could be made for that. Obviously, "it momentarily doesn't work until I hit the restore button" is definitely not bricked.

    24. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 3 years ago I bought a Sony DVD player that was unable to play discs after about a year of use due to a well documented and acknowledged firmware issue. The Sony solution was for me to pay $200 to have the firmware re-flashed....

      I bought an Oppo Digital DVD player instead. While I agree that buggy firmware can happen to any product put out by any company, the nice thing about the Oppo DVD player is that it is capable of re-flashing its firmware by just inserting a CD with the firmware update on it. You can download the firmware updates as a .iso file from their website, burn it to a disc and just pop it into the player.

      Why couldn't Sony have thought of that? If firmware problems are as common as anyone claims they are why don't any of these companies engineer their products so that the firmware is easy to update? After all it's not as if these devices are lacking the capability from a technical point of view to accomplish something like updating the firmware. I'm not an expert but even for bricked devices I feel that companies should engineer their products so that the firmware can be re-flashed to some good state.

    25. Re:Sony is no longer a reputable vendor by davotoula · · Score: 1

      "It's not the failure - it's the failure to handle the failure."

      Classic, I've scribbled it down in my book of quotes :-)

  4. Bricked Consoles? by Amnenth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So now Nintendo and Sony have both managed to brick consoles with firmware updates. Great.

    Sorry, fellas. YOU broke it, YOU don't get to bill US to fix your mistakes.

    1. Re:Bricked Consoles? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Informative

      AFAIK Nintendo has offered free repairs for Wiis bricked by the 4.2 update.

    2. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Amnenth · · Score: 1

      That's pretty handy, actually. Still I'd rather not update mine until the update itself has a zero chance of bricking my unit. Even if it IS free, that's time where the wii itself is left unusable. (And I'm far from the only person who wants to use this one in particular.)

    3. Re:Bricked Consoles? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      So out of 25 million units sold, 'thousands' of units were damaged by the update? If you release a software update that only causes problems with roughly one hundredth of a percent of your user base, using several different hardware revisions, I think your quality testing division did a good job. Who is to say these users weren't already running marginal hardware, and the new firmware just doesn't handle faults as gracefully?

      I'm not in defense of Sony, I have no knowledge of this particular issue, but EVERY TIME new firmwares are released for a device, someone's device stops working. This case just seems like this time, they managed to break the device of a rather vocal and litigious user.

    4. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The story isn't the system getting bricked, but having users pay for the fix. If a Ford breaks down that is fine. It is a Ford and I expected it to happen sooner or later, but if a Ford rep shows up in my driveway and tells me that he needs to "fix something" before I can drive it and his fix causes my engine to melt, I'll damn sure expect him to fix it or at least pay for the damages.

    5. Re:Bricked Consoles? by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      So now Nintendo and Sony have both managed to brick consoles with firmware updates. Great.

      I know I can't be the first person to think the next line was going to say something about Xbox 360 bricking so as to complete the unholy trinity.

    6. Re:Bricked Consoles? by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why the Xbox360 is the superior console.

      It bricks itself out of the box. No updates needed.

    7. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't understand this kind of behavior. At best, it saves them money in the short run, but the people whose consoles were bricked are not likely to go out and buy Sony's next product, and it's awful PR. Conversely, it'd be excellent PR if they sent out someone who said, "Oops, our goof. We're very sorry and we're going to make it right at our expense. And here's a free game for your trouble."

      Of course, that would require long term thinking and a basic sense of decency...

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    8. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Pharmboy · · Score: 0, Troll

      And Sony continues to show contempt for their own customers. Fortunately, this doesn't affect me as I haven't bought any Sony music, movies, hardware or consumer products since the whole "root kit" issue. Coincidently, people are still saying "oh get over it, that root kit thing was years ago". Yes, it was, and they still don't care about their customers. Why in doG's name would I buy anything from a company like that? I don't have to, and I don't. There are too many other companies out there that try to earn my hard earned money.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:Bricked Consoles? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's pretty handy, actually. Still I'd rather not update mine until the update itself has a zero chance of bricking my unit. Even if it IS free, that's time where the wii itself is left unusable. (And I'm far from the only person who wants to use this one in particular.)

      Good idea. 3.0 has an ad ticker that you cannot disable - it's constantly scrolling stuff for you to buy, new games, etc. (This is different from the startup ad, which you CAN disable). 2.x had the "info bar" ticker as well, but that was also something you can disable. In 3.0, the only way to disable it is to delete the internet connection. Serves me right for updating it when I really only use it as a blu-ray player.

      They also seemed to have broken auto-startup of disc if you turn your PS3 off with the disc inside, and have auto-disc-startup enabled. If it's a blu-ray movie you're watching, it means you either eject/insert, or have to click over to movie, then start it manually.

      Hopefully 3.1 fixes these two issues.

      The only good part is there are less ads on the PS3 than the Xbox360 (though excepting the annoying sound one, I find the Xbox360 NXE ads useful...)

    10. Re:Bricked Consoles? by meyekul · · Score: 1

      Wow, not only did you use a car analogy to flame Sony, but you also got a zinger in on Ford as well. Kudos.

    11. Re:Bricked Consoles? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      It's more like you bring your Chevy in for an update to continue using OnStar, and it melts your engine. You can continue driving your car just fine without the update and OnStar.

      The other issue is that the plaintiff purchased his system in January, and it stopped working after the update in September. That means it is still under the one year warranty, and Sony charges you exactly nothing for repair. Alternatively, that means he bought someone's *used* system in January, the system was likely several years old, and may have been subject to poor care by the previous owner. (see above comment about old, marginal, failing hardware)

    12. Re:Bricked Consoles? by samsmithnz · · Score: 1

      That's why the Xbox360 is the superior console.

      It bricks itself out of the box. No updates needed.

      If I could mod you up further I would. Funniest comment of the week. :)

    13. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first off no it doesn't. second when microsoft made the error and had a bad design flaw instead of charging you they extended the warrenty to cover the bricked xbox. so they cover there mistakes.

    14. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had that happen to me once. I brought my truck (Chevy) in for some work and drove around for a week with my taillights not working. I deduced this by noticing that people couldn't tell I was turning or braking. When I took the truck back in, the mechanic said that he had to reconnect wires they previously disconnected and "didn't charge me for it". I told him, "You didn't charge me? You're lucky I didn't get hurt and then have to sue you"

    15. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

    16. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, but suppose you have some parts added to your powertrain after the warranty expires, and these ultimately lead to the failure of your transmission. Who is financially responsible for the repair, you, or Ford?

    17. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Captain+Chaos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microsoft was also being hit with lawsuits over the hardware failures of the 360, so don't go thinking they extended the warranty because of their benevolent nature. Not everyone with a broken 360 got a free fix, many died before the warranty extension. I knew someone who made a nice little side job of repairing 360s that were out of warranty for less than Microsoft was charging.

    18. Re:Bricked Consoles? by travbrad · · Score: 1

      There were no Nazi comparisons though, therefore I can only award him/her 9/10 internet points.

    19. Re:Bricked Consoles? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      If Ford installed the powertrain and the ultimate failure was immediate, I'd vote for Ford.

    20. Re:Bricked Consoles? by bjb · · Score: 1
      They've offered to take your Wii in for repair (basically a motherboard replacement), but if they find that you have the Homebrew channel installed (or any other "hack"), then they will charge you the $120 or whatever it is for service. They will only waive the fee if the machine is clean of any exploits.

      Worth noting because the speculation is that the only reason for the latest ROM release was to thwart homebrewers.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    21. Re:Bricked Consoles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More car metaphors, eh?

  5. Legal Recourse by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Informative

    you may now have legal recourse thanks to a class action suit against Sony.

    I'm probably being excessively pedantic, but you don't need a class action suit to have "legal recourse." It's just easier as a class. You can sue on your own if your property was damaged or a contract was violated.

    --
    $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    1. Re:Legal Recourse by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you think about it, wouldn't it hurt Sony more if everyone that was harmed by Sony's "update" took them to small claims court? They'd have to send a lawyer & in some jurisdictions, they'd actually have to send an officer of the company. If no one shows up, they lose by default. Class action lawsuits are there to make things easier on the legal system & on lawyers, but you know what? Screw both of them.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:Legal Recourse by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      It also makes things easier on the client. Joining a class saves time compared to having to take a day or two off from work to go to court, which could cost you more in lost wages than paying for the repair anyway.

    3. Re:Legal Recourse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the damage was $400 (or whatever a PS3 costs) and the cost of suing on your own is $10,000, then no, you don't have legal recourse on your own.

    4. Re:Legal Recourse by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      We aren't talking about a repair. You simply add that cost on top of the cost for a new PS3. Most small claims courts limit damages from $500 - $1500. Florida's happens to be $5000. My step-father has taken a few renters to small claims over damages or back rent & the lost wages addition is pretty standard.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:Legal Recourse by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      As the above poster mentioned, small claims court.
      Sue for the cost of the console and filing fees.
      I'm relatively sure no one will show to contest the suit, as that would cost more than the default judgment.

      Don't sue for replacement unit, sue for replacement cost, thus you can keep your old unit for parts and such.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:Legal Recourse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right and the class action lawsuit gets the lawyers a chunk of change. Oh, and the actual customers get a coupon for $5 off on a future purchase though too and that must be kind of nice...

    7. Re:Legal Recourse by pigphish · · Score: 1

      Truthfully no one would bother unless it was a class action. The Sony attorneys I am sure bitterly fought having a class approved by the court. The attorneys will be the real winners either way.

    8. Re:Legal Recourse by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You can bet your ass I would especially after seeing how easy default judgements are to obtain when the other side doesn't show up. Taking off of work is no problem for me, even on short notice. Hell, I can work at home when I need to.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    9. Re:Legal Recourse by pigphish · · Score: 1

      I believe most people do not have your flexibility and would not take off work to waste half a day in small claims court for a few bucks.

    10. Re:Legal Recourse by eyrieowl · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can't speak for other places...but at least in Texas, it might be easy enough to win the small claims filing, but it isn't binding, on appeal, they can go to regular civil court and it's as though the small-claims case never even happened. And collecting on a small claims win can be difficult. Winning is one thing, getting money is another. So they could easily let you pay the fees for filing suit in small claims court, not bother showing, and then appeal when you win to regular court, which...if you don't get a lawyer for the appeal, they could win, and force you to eat the court costs and legal fees. It sounds like a nice way to annoy them, but when you start looking at the practicalities, the class-action works out much better.

    11. Re:Legal Recourse by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 0, Troll

      you may now have legal recourse thanks to a class action suit against Sony.

      I'm probably being excessively pedantic, but you don't need a class action suit to have "legal recourse." It's just easier as a class. You can sue on your own if your property was damaged or a contract was violated.

      Wow. Are you a lawyer? Or an idiot? Or not a US resident? Or some/all of those?

      Here's what happens when you sue on your own in the USA. No attorney will probably take the case, so you'll probably want to go to Small Claims Court where your costs are lower to file the paperwork to sue Sony. Sony may or may not show in court. If not, you can win a default judgment against them. Yea! You won $399 or whatever your PS3 cost. Now how exactly are you going to collect? Are you going to find a local law enforcement officer who will serve Sony? What if you don't serve them in the right place? What if local law enforcement doesn't want to do it? What if Sony just ignores you? Are you going to sue them again in a real court? At more expense to you? I suppose there is some chance that you might get lucky and Sony might give you a new PS3 or pay you the money, but I'm not sure I'd count on it. So yes you can sue Sony on your own just like any "natural born citizen" over the age of 35 who wants to be president of the USA can run for the job, but whether you can actually be president or get money from Sony is something completely different.

    12. Re:Legal Recourse by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      In Florida you can only appeal to a Circuit court to review the law, not the facts. The law for property damage is pretty cut & dry here. If they don't pay, you can put a lien on any real property they have until they do so. You can also have a sheriff seize non real estate property to be sold to pay your judgment.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    13. Re:Legal Recourse by ahecht · · Score: 1

      That's bull. You cannot recover lost wages incurred by appearing in small claims court. The only lost wages you can sue for in small claims court are those lost because the defendant physically prevented you from working (i.e. Sony came to your house and smashed your fingers, preventing you from working as a coder). Suing someone is voluntary. To quote the website of one cities small claims court:

      3. THE AMOUNT OF YOUR CLAIM: You may ask for money only. No other recovery is permitted in the Small Claims Division. You may not recover "punitive damages", nor lost wages, traveling expenses, costs of obtaining evidence, baby-sitting and the like, incidental to your filing, preparing, or trial appearance. You may recover court fees and interest from the defendant if you win your case.

    14. Re:Legal Recourse by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right, but I believe that people should be at least made aware that there are other methods of obtaining justice aside from a class-action. Especially when the "justice" afforded by most class-actions is meager at best & insulting at worst.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    15. Re:Legal Recourse by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      They don't lose by default. You still have to prove your case to the Judge, which shouldn't be too hard to do, simply bring documentation about how the update is bricking/breaking PS3 units, documentation showing that your PS3 was affected, and documentation of the cost that Sony quoted you to fix the PS3 that their update broke. The Judge is smart enough to connect the dots, but you still need to show enough proof that your PS3 was affected and you simply are not someone trying to sue for a problem that some people experienced, but not you specifically.

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    16. Re:Legal Recourse by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      The problem is that small claims court -- or for that matter, even a regular civil court -- won't collect the judgment for you. At best, you get a piece of paper that says that the defendant owes you money. Then you have to find a way to get it out of them.

      And in many jurisdictions, lawyers are specifically barred from small claims court.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    17. Re:Legal Recourse by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Florida you can file a lien on real property or have a sheriff seize property and sell it to pay you your judgment.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    18. Re:Legal Recourse by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You're correct about that, I confused exclusive & and inclusive. Everything else I've stated stands.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    19. Re:Legal Recourse by westlake · · Score: 1

      I'm probably being excessively pedantic, but you don't need a class action suit to have "legal recourse." It's just easier as a class

      American courts don't much like class action suits. They tend to mask very real differences in the law and facts of a particular case. The first hurdle then is to convince a judge that this is really the way he ought to go - and it will not be easy.

    20. Re:Legal Recourse by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Should point out that Sony has an office in Fort Myers, and might still have one in Boca Raton. This is discounting any Sonystyle retail shops they might have.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    21. Re:Legal Recourse by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      In Alaska, small claims court and full court are exactly the same legally. The difference is that the procedural rules are relaxed in small claims (caps on damages, lower fees, and forms available for common motions to help out).

    22. Re:Legal Recourse by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You don't get lawyers in small claims court. That gives individual civil suits against the company a better chance of succeeding.

      You'd notice that I haven't put in my usual "Let me call my lawyers." I really see no big reason to call the lawyers. This would've been much better if they had just done this individually.

      But then again, Sony can ask that it be made a class action suit based on the number of similar suits filed across the country, that would put it back into their advantage.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    23. Re:Legal Recourse by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Depends on the state. Attorneys are allowed in Florida small claims courts. Also, I'm pretty sure you can't be forced into class action if you don't want to be.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    24. Re:Legal Recourse by pluther · · Score: 1

      What state is that in?

      When I sued my landlord in San Joaquin County, California, the judge awarded travel expenses for my costs in coming from Portland, Oregon, for the trial. (At $.285/mile no less, which paid me about three times what I'd originally paid for the car I used)

      In another, unrelated countersuit I was involved in (in Oakland, CA), paying an expert witness was an awardable expense as well.

      Most of my court experience was in the late 80s/early 90s, so perhaps things have changed since then. But I strongly suspect it varies by district.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    25. Re:Legal Recourse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like a nice way to annoy them, but when you start looking at the practicalities, the class-action works out much better.

      Not true, class action sucks. The only ones who win is the lawyers. I was part of a multi-million dollar class-action lawsuit against VISA a few years back. Once the lawyers got their cut, everyone else in the class got like $0.35. Although I'll admit that the class was pretty large (like half the country).

    26. Re:Legal Recourse by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Most companies have legal teams that are smart enough to pay up. If you win in court and they don't pay its going to cost them a lot more to defend themselves in "real court" (as you say) than to just simply pay you the $400 or whatever. A few threatening letters and your money is as good as in the mail. I've known people that have made careers out of perpetual lawsuits.

    27. Re:Legal Recourse by mikael · · Score: 1

      Canada does the same - first thing anyone who wishes to buy property or a second hand car, is to check to see if there are any outstanding liens. Oh yes, and check to see that the seller is the actual seller and not a renting tenant looking to make a quick sale by selling their landlords property.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    28. Re:Legal Recourse by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      So they could easily let you pay the fees for filing suit in small claims court, not bother showing, and then appeal when you win to regular court, which...

      ..except that you only got a $200 judgment.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    29. Re:Legal Recourse by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      I would think the best bet would be to take it to the local news. Sony might consider the $300 cheaper than having to go to court to overturn the other decision and deal with the negative publicity.

  6. How do I get in on this? by Banichi · · Score: 1

    My PS3 freezes/crashes when displaying certain websites on the browser. It is a repeatable thing, it never happened before the 3.xx patches. Any recourse on my part?

    1. Re:How do I get in on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest contacting the Attorney' s list in the PDF.

    2. Re:How do I get in on this? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Any recourse on my part?

      Well, there are a few things you could do.

      1. Take a plane to Japan, find the CEO, and kill him with a brick (or a bricked PS2)
      2. Take several hundred pounds of explosives and destroy one of their offices
      3. Steal a B-52 that's loaded with nukes and nuke Japan again

      Unfortunately, these methods may be of dubious legality. But it's nice to daydream.

    3. Re:How do I get in on this? by MartinSchou · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you ENTIRELY certain, that nuking Japan is against the law in other countries?

      Personally I'd be surprised if you could find that in the books anywhere except perhaps Japan.

      I'm not endorsing, just saying that it might not be as illegal as you think.

    4. Re:How do I get in on this? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, it might not be illegal in North Korea, but it's illegal in the US and iinm, Europe.

    5. Re:How do I get in on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US have done it, it's not illegal. CAPTCHA says "indeed"

    6. Re:How do I get in on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but stealing the B52 would land you in a deep dark hole until your 2000th birthday if you were cought.

    7. Re:How do I get in on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you ENTIRELY certain, that nuking Japan is against the law in other countries?

      I'm pretty sure they could get you for public disturbance or something.

    8. Re:How do I get in on this? by ummcdou4 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that nuking Japan would be deemed illegal.

      But the USAF will sure sue the pants off you for copyright violation.

    9. Re:How do I get in on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think international law might forbid it. An EMP maybe? It's unlikely to affect the playstation research centre though as it's seems their technicians have beat you to it :(

    10. Re:How do I get in on this? by ThorofAsgard · · Score: 1

      While it may not be that the nuking of Japan is illegal, it's the stealing of the plane and the warheads on it that would be breaking the law.

    11. Re:How do I get in on this? by SoulRider · · Score: 1

      I think we can be pretty sure its legal (and encouraged) in North Korea!

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. So glad... by Loomismeister · · Score: 5, Funny

    I went with microsoft instead of sony...

    1. Re:So glad... by plague3106 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ya, no updates needed to brick an xbox!

    2. Re:So glad... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At least Microsoft fixes them for free.

    3. Re:So glad... by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      So MS is a lot more eco-friendly than Sony. Save bandwidth, save power, save Earth!

    4. Re:So glad... by Cheeko · · Score: 0, Redundant

      at least they fix it for free.

    5. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only after denying the problem for ages and to avoid even costlier lawsuits. Well and to avoid a PR disaster, which surprisingly even worked (in the US).

    6. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But only after being confronted with a double digit failure rate. At first M$ didn't acknowledge and people had to pay!
      The original 360 was defective by design. They should have replaced all units (which they didn't)!

    7. Re:So glad... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Only becasue if there didnt, they would have a class action judgment against them like never before. EVERYONE knows that microsoft KNEW the design was bad and went ahead anyways. THere is no doubt that microsoft would have had to do this or be FORCED into it.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:So glad... by thisisaccount2 · · Score: 1

      It's "Microsoft". Even "MS" if you must abbreviate. Typing "M$" makes you look like a fourteen year old boy.

    9. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Microsoft fixes them for free.

      Not mine they want to charge me 110 dollars because the last update messed up and it runs my fans now at 100%

    10. Re:So glad... by Loomismeister · · Score: 1

      Likewise, EVERYONE knows that the ps3 is LAME and xbox360 is millions of times way cooler. There is no doubt sony will force everyone else to pay for it, because sony doesn't have money to fix this screwup!

    11. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no they don't. They will fix it for free if you got it within a specific timeframe of the failure, otherwise you pay $100. My roommate just had his box rrod and microsoft wouldn't fix it without the payment because he got his so long ago (at release).

      I used to be a console whore, but the last console I bought was a ps2. The way things are going the ps2 is going to also be the *last* console I buy.

    12. Re:So glad... by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      They're not going to do that forever, now are they? What are you going to do then?

    13. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only.

      Mine died a month out of warranty... so I'm going to have to fork out a few hundred for a new system.

      More and more of the release systems are starting to fail, only this time Microsoft will do fuck all about it.

    14. Re:So glad... by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      don't we all wish we were 14 again?

      --
      Balderdash!
    15. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to pay NZ$190 to get my Xbox 360 repaired, red ring just out of Warrantee 8( Only upside is I now have another year warrante and they chipped in for a one month XBox live acount.
      Howeever the two chipped original xboxes I have are still running fine and get very regular use.

    16. Re:So glad... by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      The real nice thing is that MS extended the warranty. Officially. Class action lawsuit or not, it's nice that the company officially announces that they screwed up big time and have an actual policy in place. You know what terms of service you can get.

      If you run into a problem with Nintendo, they say to contact the company and they will deal with it on a case-by-case basis. Yeah, I've heard they'll fix anything, but they still don't like making public statements that anything is their fault and that they will fix it.

      As for Sony, well... they released an update to put ads in a product people already bought. That's prime customer service right there!

    17. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm only if your under warranty and then sony does the same....

    18. Re:So glad... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      This is Sony's new PR tactic to increase sales of the PS3:

      1) Release Patch
      2) Brick PS3s
      3) Make people pay for repairs or new PS3s
      4) ????
      5) Profit

      So no matter how you look at it, PS3s will always be $599USD!

    19. Re:So glad... by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

      Sony will too when this lawsuit is resolved...

    20. Re:So glad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft stalled and refused to admit the problem, but still ended up extending their warranty to cover the issues before a class action was filed. (Warranty extension was in 2007, RROD class action in California was filed in 2008). IIRC, Nintendo didn't wait for a mention of class action to come up until they offered a free fix. They went ahead early on in order to maintain a good reputation. After all, they had already been hit with a wrist strap lawsuit and had seen the results of the XBOX 360 debacle. Now you would think Sony would have learned from their competitors and immediately offered to repair the problem counsoles, but apparently not. Seems to me the most contempt you could show your consumer is to damage their product with and update, force them to pay to repair it, and fight a class action (Sony's not fighting it yet) when all of your competitors repair similar issues for free. At least MS made a rational decision when they got pinned in.

  9. Bricked? by Knara · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think these are really "bricked" consoles, are they? They boot, but they malfunction. That's not "bricking" anything.

    1. Re:Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main job of a console is to play games and movies provided on DVD. If it can no longer read said DVD it is pretty much a brick unless your a huge fan of the splash screen.

    2. Re:Bricked? by Random2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because I obviously bought my PS3 for the great internet browser...

      --
      "Our goal each year should be to increase the number of goals we set for ourselves!"
    3. Re:Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Like the term "hacker", the mainstream is mis-using the term "bricked" and "to brick". A bricked piece of hardware is generally only recoverable by re-flashing the hardware using JTAG or the like.

    4. Re:Bricked? by Knara · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, because I obviously bought my PS3 for the great internet browser...

      That's not really the point.

      "Bricked" came from the idea that the piece of hardware is "as useful as a brick" because it's unable to operate *at all*.

      Now, obviously this sort of thing greatly reduces the usefulness of the device, but your statement itself shows that the device is *not*bricked*. Just broken.

    5. Re:Bricked? by Random2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although that may have been the original slang definition of the word, it has changed over time to mean anything that has failed. (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bricked)

      In a similar example, goodbye was originally a statement meaning 'god be with you'. Now it is simply a parting.

      A gaming console that can't play games or a DVD player that can't read DVDs is a failure and can be declared as 'bricked'.

      --
      "Our goal each year should be to increase the number of goals we set for ourselves!"
    6. Re:Bricked? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Although that may have been the original slang definition of the word, it has changed over time to mean anything that has failed. (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bricked)

      In a similar example, goodbye was originally a statement meaning 'god be with you'. Now it is simply a parting.

      A gaming console that can't play games or a DVD player that can't read DVDs is a failure and can be declared as 'bricked'.

      There's more nuance to it than that. You use 'bricked' when you're talking about Sony or Apple and 'broke" when talking about Microsoft or Nintendo.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although that may have been the original slang definition of the word, it has changed over time to mean anything that has failed.

      That is the same logic I use when I go around telling people I never ever sleep. I simply go dead every night, and then become living again the next morning.

      No one seems to believe me that the definition of the word 'dead' has changed however, and they still argue that it is not possible to bring someone back from death.

      I argue of course one can bring you back from death, you just have to be the right kind of dead.
      Identical to how a bricked device is not at all a bad thing, you just reinstall it and you are back up and un-bricked! /sarcasm
      Yes, you can 'un-brick' something equally as much as you can 'un-die', in other words, not at all.

      If it is bricked, it does not get fixed, they send you a totally new different replacement.
      If they can fix it, it was never bricked, just broken.

      And no, I don't care what idiots define things as.

    8. Re:Bricked? by nametaken · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah... bricked means bricked.

      "dictionary.reference.com"? As the wiki puts it, "When used in reference to consumer electronics, 'brick' describes a device that cannot function in any capacity (such as a device with damaged firmware)."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brick_(electronics)

      It has always meant that.

    9. Re:Bricked? by Knara · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

    10. Re:Bricked? by KTheorem · · Score: 0, Troll

      In that case, no device can ever be bricked, as they can function in the capacities of: paperweight, doorstop, or therapeutic stress relief target (you can hit it with a bat) just to name a few. If your pedantic definition of a word renders it nearly meaningless, then I don't see what problem you could possibly have with a more useful re-purposing of the word as something actually applicable.

    11. Re:Bricked? by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Yes, because I obviously bought my PS3 for the great internet browser...

      That's not really the point.

      "Bricked" came from the idea that the piece of hardware is "as useful as a brick" because it's unable to operate *at all*.

      Now, obviously this sort of thing greatly reduces the usefulness of the device, but your statement itself shows that the device is *not*bricked*. Just broken.

      I was at traffic court once in Cook County many years ago. There was a person trying to get out of a parking ticket. She explained that she should not have gotten the ticket because her car was only one inch into the designated no-parking zone, and had a picture to prove it. The judge asked her to repeat her statement. "One inch over?" "Yes, one inch over." He then said defendant admits guilt. Case closed. Pay your ticket on the way out.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    12. Re:Bricked? by jsjacob · · Score: 1

      All of those uses (paperweight, doorstop, therapeutic stress relief target) also apply to bricks in general, so the definition "as useful as a brick" still applies. I don't see your argument supporting your statement that the definition is nearly meaningless.

      --
      John S. Jacob * jsjacob@iamnota.com * www.iamnota.com * pgp: ac6ace17
    13. Re:Bricked? by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's cool. We're takin it back!

      Porch Monkey 4 Life!

      --
      +1 Disagree
  10. You break it, you buy it. by Mashhaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or, more accurately in this case, you buy it, we break it.

    1. Re:You break it, you buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet: you "license" it, we break it.

    2. Re:You break it, you buy it. by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      That sounds suspiciously like an "In Soviet Russia" joke ... might need a little twist to really hit home ...

      "In Sony's America, you buy it, they break it"?

  11. "Improves System Stability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well I suppose a bricked console is "stable", isn't it?

    1. Re:"Improves System Stability" by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      Hell no, many bricks are unstable. Depends on the footing.

    2. Re:"Improves System Stability" by yanyan · · Score: 1

      Yes. Stable as a brick. Oh wait...

  12. When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by WCMI92 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sony is REPEATEDLY caught doing nefarious things. Rootkits on a CD. Deleting 2/3rds of a MMO (The Star Wars Galaxies NGE) the day after selling an expansion for it, which included features marketed that applied to the 2/3rds that got deleted. They've gotten caught multiple times price fixing CDs. They have released a version of the PSP, called the PSPGo that requires you to repurchase all your games. They've also been caught deploying astroturfers and viral marketers to fake reviews and artificially pump their products.

    They also run what I believe is an illegal international lottery with respect to their "trading" card games in their MMOs.

    So why would it surprise anyone that Sony, not exactly well known for the quality of their coding work (if SOE is representative of it) would release a buggy firmware that destroys hardware and then make people pay $150 to fix their own defect?

    Sony is all about revenue streams! Stealing from their customers is just yet another one of those.

    This suit is going to cost them millions and will no doubt harm their reputation even more than all of the above have. Sony must not care about their reputation, since they do nothing at all constructive to improve it. Hint: repeatedly assfucking your customers does NOT a good reputation make.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only thing that surprises me is that out of the seven billion people on this planet, there are enough of them dumb enough to buy ANYTHING from a company like this for it to stay in business.

    2. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

      Hint: repeatedly assfucking your customers does NOT a good reputation make.

      Unless you're in the homosexual prostitution business of course....

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    3. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

      Whoever coined the phrase "buyer beware" was probably bleeding from the ass. - The late and great GC.

      --
      ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
    4. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by tha_toadman · · Score: 1

      After seeing this headline, I figured that Sony was just using this as a ploy to recoup some of the massive losses they've taken in the manufacturing-to-sales of the PS3 itself.

    5. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only thing that surprises me is that out of the seven billion people on this planet, there are enough of them dumb enough to buy ANYTHING from a company like this for it to stay in business.

      It takes a while. Nintendo is slowly increasing its lead in market capitalization over the entire Sony empire.

      • Sony market cap, including at least Sony Pictures, Sony Music, Sony Electronics, Sony Online Entertainment, and Sony Computer Entertainment: $28.0 billion
      • Nintendo market cap: $34.5 billion
    6. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by WCMI92 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only thing that surprises me is that out of the seven billion people on this planet, there are enough of them dumb enough to buy ANYTHING from a company like this for it to stay in business.

      Well, I have LONG ago ceased to buy Sony, and I did it because of the Star Wars Galaxies NGE. Indeed, I've used my position as head of IT at my company, which is one of the larger businesses in it's industry in the Eastern USA, to make sure that Sony isn't even CONSIDERED for purchases. I cost them $50K worth of plasma displays, for example, when we rolled out a videoconferencing system simply by taking Sony off the bid specs as a valid provider when we bid it out.

      Sony is not a reputable company, and they do not make better products than alternate vendors. Sad thing about that is that 20 years ago no one had a better reputation than Sony and their products were ALWAYS a cut above anything similar. It's taken them this long to live off the capital of their once great name to reach the point of near bankruptcy.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    7. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by surfdaddy · · Score: 1

      Sony has had isolationism built into their DNA for a long time. The Betamax - proprietary. And I'll tell you that even though I like some of Sony's cameras - they all use Sony's own proprietary Memory Stick formats! I have an older Sony camera and it uses the Memory Stick Duo - a discontinued proprietary format. So I've sworn off Sony forever, and I suggest you all do the same. I also got rootkitted from their copy protected CD. Such a shame from the company that invented the original Walkman. They've ceased to be innovative and are now the worst of the DRM and proprietary crap out there. Screw the customers!

    8. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Sony is REPEATEDLY caught doing nefarious things.

      The trouble is, so is anybody else. Its not like going with a Xbox360 would somehow made things better, it would simply have given you a heap of different problems.

    9. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Hint: repeatedly assfucking your customers does NOT a good reputation make.

      Unless you are a gay gigolo or your customers have a strap-on fetish.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by debrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The history of Sony's management is quite fascinating. I've lost the link, but I recall there being an article about Sony's decision over who to replace their then-CEO around 1999 (Norio Ohga), who had been CEO for ages and brought Sony to new economic heights. The choice of his successor was either the head of Sony Entertainment (i.e. the copyright/media side of Sony) or the head of Sony Computer (i.e. the head of the electronics side). They ended up choosing the head of the copyright/media side of Sony, Nobuyuki Idei.

      Anecdotally, since that decision, I've noticed that Sony's technology shine has dropped completely off my radar (i.e. I don't even turn to them to find out what the latest and greatest tech is, whereas at one point they were certainly a contender for something that I'd consider cool), while their foray into rent-seeking for their copyright has also gone off the deep end.

      I might be wrong about the details of the history - I'd be interested in finding the article again, or having the background.

      If it's true, I believe the change in the "personality" or "culture" of Sony reflects the decision that they made to make the head of their copyright/media division the head of the company. I believe their shareholders have been paying for that decision ever since.

    11. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      The Floppy and CD were proprietary Sony inventions too.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    12. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by aafiske · · Score: 1

      "They also run what I believe is an illegal international lottery with respect to their "trading" card games in their MMOs."

      Wait, what? When did a magic the gathering clone become a way of winning money? Why is trading in quotes?

      Helpful hint: your argumentative points have more weight when you don't sound like a complete loon trying to make sinister conspiracies out of mundane card games.

    13. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      I'd far prefer competition between some evil companies than a monopoly of the game industry, though.

    14. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by tepples · · Score: 1

      There will be no monopoly of the game industry as long as Microsoft, Apple, and Canonical are in business. If console makers start acting up, expect PC platforms to take off again.

    15. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      The Floppy and CD were proprietary Sony inventions too.

      Uh, no (that would be IBM) and no (was developed with Philips).

    16. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      The 3.5" floppy? Sony.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    17. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      So you've reduced the pool of bidders because of a MMORPG that was crappy before Sony took over, was crappy after Sony took over, doesn't interest anyone at your company in the least and apart from being completely unrelated to plasma displays is also made by a part of the corp that is almost completely unrelated to the part that manufactures said displays.

      If that's your kind of decision making I would have fired you years ago, but with /.'s huge SWG fanboy pool your reasoning probably seems perfectly valid and sane.

      There are reasons for excluding bidders but nerd rage over SWG isn't one of them.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    18. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by cyberworm · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget ATRAC when talking about dead formats. Mini disc would have been great and they could have had the ipod market if all of their portable music devices didn't insist on using that horrible horrible format when portable digital music started taking off.

    19. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, you kicked someone out of a bid because they broke your wookie? I hope for your sake that your bosses don't know how much of a tit you are.

      At least leave them in long enough to pull the overall price down. Dick.

    20. Re:When are people going to learn to NOT buy Sony? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      "First to release" != "proprietary invention"

  13. Sony is Evil! by oo_HAWK_oo · · Score: 0

    Officially BANNED for life!

  14. And all of this could have been avoided... by bhunachchicken · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... if they'd simply added a clause to the End User License agreement to state that the hardware still belonged to them and the "owner" was merely "renting it" :)

    1. Re:And all of this could have been avoided... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Illegal in Europe, afaik. If it looks like a buy it is a buy. We don't like those kind of games.

  15. PC by Dyinobal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why I continue to buy PCs I like to have a lot of control over my gaming system. That and Consoles are simply trying to play catch up with PCs still. Seriously only this generation has just now gotten 'online' support. The fact you have to pay for online capability on some systems is ridiculous too. It now seems that Sony is far from it's glory days of the PS1 and Nintendo far from theirs with the Super Nintendo.

    1. Re:PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consoles have had online support for a decade now, where the hell have you been?

    2. Re:PC by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Well if you want to pedantic about it, the GameCube, Nintendo64, PS2 & Dreamcast all had networking capability of some form or another.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:PC by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      The Japanese version of the Nintendo Entertainment System, AKA the Famicom, had a dial-up modem. The Sega Genesis had a cable modem cartridge.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:PC by sabernet · · Score: 1

      If you want to be uber-pedantic, so did the SEGA Genesis, the SNES, the NES(well...almost), the Atari 2600 and the Intellivision.

    5. Re:PC by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, I had no idea those ancient consoles had accessories like that. Of course, I was like 3 when the Atari 2600 debuted.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    6. Re:PC by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the original Xbox had online gaming capability superior to that found in some PC games that ship today. Xbox Live had its share fo problems, and the hardware wasn't anythign to write home about even by the standards of its day, but it wasn't bad. The pay-to-play is the most annoying portion of the system, but on the flip side, cheating is somewhat less of a problem than it is on many PC games.

      The 360 and PS3 are both very impressive, spec-wise. For example, the 360 has support for 6 hardware threads running at 3.2 GHz - that's WAY above the typical PC even today, never mind when it was released (OK, PPC vs. x86 ISA plus the capabilities of the CPU means you can't simply compare clock speed, but still - that's a lot of CPU power).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    7. Re:PC by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the original Xbox had online gaming capability superior to that found in some PC games that ship today.

      In return for some centralized laddering (which Blizzard had years earlier with Battlenet) you gave up modding. All the features added in Halo 2 and 3 could have been modded into the first game within a couple months after its release. Whoop de do.

    8. Re:PC by pnumoman · · Score: 1

      What's the problem with paying for online capability? Are they giving out free internet to PCs where you live?

    9. Re:PC by ifinallyjoined · · Score: 1

      Umm the Dreamcast had online support for select titles way back in 98 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreamcast#Games . It worked quite well too as i remember . Having to pay for online is ridiculous i do agree with that . However my unnatural hatred of Sony forced me to buy a 360 the same reason i bought the original Xbox as well.

    10. Re:PC by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Preview FAIL.

      To be fair, the original Xbox had online gaming capability superior to that found in some PC games that ship today.

      In return for some centralized laddering (which Blizzard had years earlier with Battlenet) you gave up modding. All the features added in Halo 2 and 3 could have been modded into the first game within a couple months after its release. Whoop de do.

    11. Re:PC by ZosX · · Score: 1

      6 cores is not way ahead of what a lot of pcs have right now (4 cores). PCs are beating the xbox 360 in terms of graphics. Beating it like a red headed stepchild. Asides from being PPC and six cores, there is nothing really all that exotic about the 360 hardware. Its got a good gpu and a ppc. Wow. It uses a flavor of direct x for programming. All these things make it much more like a regular old pc than anything. The PS2 and PS3 are something else though...I don't know about their graphics being revolutionary but it sure seems quite overly complex.

    12. Re:PC by Dal+Platinum · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do. Do you pay extra on top of your ISP bill to use a PC on the internet? If so, do you need any bridges?

  16. HDMI Died in the update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else have their HDMI output stop working after the update?

    Sony will never get another dollar from me after this fiasco. Screw up my device with a required update and then require me to pay for it? Hell a LCD tv I bought of theirs died after 6 months showing shoddy parts. But at least they fixed that for free.

    1. Re:HDMI Died in the update by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Try doing the poweroff reset thing. power the PS3 off, then power it back on, holding the power button for 5 seconds.

  17. we don't need no firmware upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All in all, its just another Brick in the wall

  18. emergency reset./unbrick circuit aka service mode by davidwr · · Score: 1

    This is why computers, smart phones, and other BIOS-updateable machines should have a "service mode."

    Set the "service mode" jumper and the machine boots to a ROM which does nothing but load new firmware from a known location.

    In the alternative, have an easy-to-replace BIOS chip so bricked firmware can be replaced.

    Of course, this won't do you any good if the bad firmware caused physical damage.

    ***Bonus*** if the device can't update its BIOS without a hardware switch being held down, to prevent stealth updates.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  19. And when they win by kenp2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After all that, if they win, every customer will get their machine fixes for free but with a 4-6 week turn around time, they customer will still have to pay $20-$35 for shipping the borked machine back, and get a nice voucher for $35 to reimburse the shipping cost usable in the Playstation Online store. Meanwhile the lawyers will get a multi-million dollar paycheck out of the victory.

    Sony - 0
    Consumer - 1
    Lawyers - 10

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:And when they win by Nidi62 · · Score: 0, Troll

      That was what I liked about Microsoft when my 360 RRoD'd. They sent me the label, shipping was paid for, all I had to cover was the box. The free month of xbox live wasnt bad either. Turn around was pretty good too.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:And when they win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's more like:

      Sony - 1
      Consumer - 0 or -1

      Sony gets an online store purchase you otherwise wouldn't make, from the shipping costs, and you the consumer get only a working console minus downtime and shipping costs

    3. Re:And when they win by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Worse than that, they'll have to call the Sony Service automated system to arrange an RMA. I had to deal with this when my Sony "Dream System" (more like nightmare system) DVD player stopped working. Ever try to read out your serial number over the phone to a voice recognition system that apparently does not understand English? I did, several times in fact, before I gave up and took it to an independent repair shop. Great strategy for reducing the number of units sent back for repair under warranty, not so good strategy for encouraging repeat business. Like many people, I have solemnly sworn to never again buy a Sony product!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:And when they win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't stop counting; you haven't gotten to 4 yet.

    5. Re:And when they win by Zarrot · · Score: 1, Informative

      Agreed. It was also much faster than I expected and they extended all the warranties for Red Ring of Death issues. All in all it was a plus customer service experience for me.

    6. Re:And when they win by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you gotta love how Microsoft haters downmod these as trolls, simply because they say something good about Microsoft. Sad really.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:And when they win by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      So rather than some lawyers taking some money, you'd rather grab your ankles for Sony? The cut-off-your-nose-to-spite-your-face attitude towards class action lawsuits never ceases to amaze me.

      Sony, the company that gave you a shitty product.
      You get some redress despite putting in zero effort with zero risk to yourself.
      The lawyers do indeed make money - because they took ALL of the risk in filing the suit.

      Oh Lord, deliver us from ankle-grabbing Republicans.

    8. Re:And when they win by arndawg · · Score: 1

      For me they sent UPS on my door to pick it up. Didn't have to package it or anything. UPS did that for me. :)

  20. I KNEW there was a reason I didn't install 3.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kept ignoring the prompt, and I'm glad I did. My significant other keeps telling me I have great intuition, but I never believed her until it involved electronic hardware.

  21. Re:Copy protection by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    I bet only old Playstation consoles like mine (40GB) are at risk. You know what? It's been running for too long at Sony's taste. Time to buy another one, or pay them to make it work again.

  22. Class Action? Phht! by clang_jangle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...you may now have legal recourse thanks to a class action suit...

    Great -- so affected users have a shot at getting a check for like, eight dollars in acouple of years while some lawyer gets rich. Gotta love that...

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:Class Action? Phht! by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Great -- so affected users have a shot at getting a check for like, eight dollars in acouple of years while some lawyer gets rich. Gotta love that...

      Oh, you were in on that Dell monitor class action to, huh? How much new monitor did your 8 bucks buy?

    2. Re:Class Action? Phht! by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Great -- so affected users have a shot at getting a check for like, eight dollars in acouple of years while some lawyer gets rich. Gotta love that...

      That's 8 bucks you wouldn't have had otherwise, through zero effort or expense of your own. And the corporation that wronged you in the first place is punished. Yes, lawyers get most of the money, but they take all of the risk - if they don't win, they don't get paid. Don't like it, hire your own damn lawyer and file your own damn lawsuit.

      Seriously, what's not to like here? Other than the Republican tendency to grab their ankles and proudly take it like a bitch, of course.

  23. Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't a brick the ultimate goal in stability?

  24. I ran out of gas and now my car is bricked! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Informative

    When it doesn't do what it's supposed to do (or stops doing what it's supposed to do), yeah, that's bricked.

    No. It's bricked when there is no hope at all at making it playable again. If it can execute code, it's not bricked.

    Honestly dude, It's bad enough the sensationalist media cannot use the term correctly.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:I ran out of gas and now my car is bricked! by geekmux · · Score: 1

      When it doesn't do what it's supposed to do (or stops doing what it's supposed to do), yeah, that's bricked.

      No. It's bricked when there is no hope at all at making it playable again. If it can execute code, it's not bricked.

      Honestly dude, It's bad enough the sensationalist media cannot use the term correctly.

      Honesty dude, it's bad enough when you blame the OP for something like that, when if in fact your definition was correct, we would not have terms like "de-bricking" flying around in IT-land when speaking of fixing wifi routers and the like.

    2. Re:I ran out of gas and now my car is bricked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Honesty dude, it's bad enough when you blame the OP for something like that, when if in fact your definition was correct, we would not have terms like "de-bricking" flying around in IT-land when speaking of fixing wifi routers and the like.

      Read my subject line.

    3. Re:I ran out of gas and now my car is bricked! by paziek · · Score: 1

      I think its bricked, when its as useful as a brick (or even less, cause you prob cant make a proper house with a bunch of bricked PS3). Doesn't require to stop flashing LEDs and stuff.

    4. Re:I ran out of gas and now my car is bricked! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I think its bricked, when its as useful as a brick (or even less, cause you prob cant make a proper house with a bunch of bricked PS3). Doesn't require to stop flashing LEDs and stuff.

      If it can be fixed with a re-flash, then it's not bricked, just broke. Your microwave isn't bricked because the power went out.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  25. Re:emergency reset./unbrick circuit aka service mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they (and Microsoft and Nintendo) might consider this with newer iterations after all this shit happened.

    Or maybe the greed really is there.

    We'll find out soon enough if the money towards fixes really is "not for profit".

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. no more updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont see why your all happy about sony getting the arse on this,

    if successful, it will set a precedent.....ship a bug, get sued.

    opens the door for EVERYONE.

    soon enough, they wont bother offering updates anymore, because of the small chance it might brick a system.

    1. Re:no more updates? by Zarrot · · Score: 1

      No!!!!!! The precedent is: ship a bug, make my system unusable, THEN CHARGE ME TO FIX IT, get sued ...see the difference. It's subtle but important. No one would be even talking about this if Sony said mea culpa we'll fix it. This is about companies refusing to take responsibility and trying to dodge and slime their way out of problems rather than addressing them in an honest forthright manner.

  28. I love to hate Sony by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 5, Funny

    Years ago, I bought their first "slim" digital camera. The DSC-T1. Shortly after buying it, I managed to break the totally unprotected LCD. I took full responsibility and called them up. "How much will it cost to have the screen replaced?" "If it was out of warranty, the cost would be $130 but defective screen is covered by your warranty." "No, it's not defective. I broke it. There's no way I could possibly pass this off as a manufacturing defect even if I was sleazy enough to try." "Oh, then it's $180." "What? Why does this cost more than a regular out of warranty repair?" "It just does."

    And I was fucked. It was a brand new model so the chances of a "parts" listing showing up on ebay any time soon was pretty much zero. I was already into the camera for $500. The best grey-market refurb price I could find anywhere was $400. So I paid the out of warranty repair cost PLUS the $50 "because we're dicks" fee. It was either have a $680 camera or burn the $500 I'd already spent. When the repaired camera arrived, I affixed a thin sheet of plastic over the LCD. I swore I'd never purchase another Sony product as long as I lived. That lasted about 3 years when I bought one of their photo printers (which I still use occasionally). And I've bought another camera (mixed feelings about its quality), a book reader (rocks), a cell phone (rocked), etc.

    Sony's like an ex who steals money from your wallet, badmouths you to her friends, and orders steak-n-lobster when meet up for lunch but the couple times a year you hook up seem so worth it. Until you check your wallet the next day and you swear you won't answer the phone next time she calls. And it works for a few months. But then you run into her at the mall and going to dinner is safe enough. God, she looks good...

    1. Re:I love to hate Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not understand your analogy involving women.

      Please use cars.

    2. Re:I love to hate Sony by BassMan449 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know this is modded funny, but I have to say that is one of the best analogies I've ever read.

    3. Re:I love to hate Sony by HoppQ · · Score: 1
      --
      My sig will be released in 2015 third quarter. Rating pending.
    4. Re:I love to hate Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you until the metaphor about the ex. People on /. don't have good-looking exes. We have women who started to smell bad enough that even we couldn't stand them.

    5. Re:I love to hate Sony by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I know this is modded funny, but I have to say that is one of the best analogies I've ever read.

      Nah, it would've been better if he worked a car in there somehow. All good analogies need to boil down to cars :-) /sarcasm

      I agree, a very good analogy.

    6. Re:I love to hate Sony by nametaken · · Score: 4, Funny

      $500 cameras and hookers so awesome in bed its worth being repeatedly robbed over?

      Can I have your life when you're done with it?

    7. Re:I love to hate Sony by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      You need to generate some significant hate.

      The rootkit issues was what did it for me.

      After that, no more Sony TVs, cam-corders, digital cameras, or music CDs. They lost about $15K on me alone, probably double that in people I referred to other manufacturers.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    8. Re:I love to hate Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $500 cameras and hookers so awesome in bed its worth being repeatedly robbed over?

      Dude and you didnt sell the pictures?

    9. Re:I love to hate Sony by drodal · · Score: 1

      It's like owning a Triumph TR 6. It's great when your driving on a back road, with the top down and your winding about some mountain road at twice the safe speed. But when the dual carburetors need fixing and you have to empty your bank to fix it. Well that's like buying form Sony....

  29. Sigh by Reapman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do all the +5 Insightful comments have NOTHING to do with the article? Just "DONT BUY SONY THEYRE TEH EVILZ!" This is as bad as it used to be with Microsoft articles back in the day.

    To all of the DONT BUY SONY CUZ THEYRE TEH EVILZ can you recommend me which game console to buy? Oh and please don't say PC, I game hours a day on my PC but I also like having a console for the console only games. Please tell me which console is not made by an evil corporation and doesn't brick with firmware upgrades? The ROCK SOLID 360? The Wii and it's recent hardware killing firmware too? Guess what, I'm going to buy the console that has the games I want. For me that's the PS3 and soon the Wii.

    For the record my PS3, and the PS3's of my friends (yes, I know others with them) haven't bricked, so this is far from a EVERYONES PS3 JUST DIED that some people like to make it out to be. Saying don't buy a PS3 because SoE sucks or they released a rootkit 4 years ago is up there with saying don't buy Microsoft because Bob sucked or because they killed Netscape. Pretty much EVERY major corporation has done something evil.

    Feel free to mod me down, I got some Karma to burn.

    1. Re:Sigh by spire3661 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Exactly, I dont like Sony, but the PS3 is a unique experience, unavailable from any other vendor. Im probably not going to go out and buy a Sony TV, or cell phone or computer because there is ample competition and thre is nothing really unique about those items.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Accursed truth speaker! Our people cast out the last of your kind on the eve of the Vista! Take your words and leave this place, lest we get our spears and you learn why they call this place slashdot!

    3. Re:Sigh by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To all of the DONT BUY SONY CUZ THEYRE TEH EVILZ can you recommend me which game console to buy? Oh and please don't say PC, I game hours a day on my PC but I also like having a console for the console only games. Please tell me which console is not made by an evil corporation and doesn't brick with firmware upgrades? The ROCK SOLID 360? The Wii and it's recent hardware killing firmware too? Guess what, I'm going to buy the console that has the games I want. For me that's the PS3 and soon the Wii.

      Wait... what? You're so desperately addicted to console games that the answer "none of the above" simply isn't palatable to you? Might I suggest that you have a problem for which you should seek psychiatric help?

    4. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why corporations still do this sort of shit. They will continue to sell stuff regardless. Because they have a "Monopoly" on certain things (games) or because their competitors do the same thing.

      Capitalism will fail because real competition does not exsit.

    5. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're quite the Sony astroturfer, aren't you? And if not an astroturfer, quite the fanboi. (I mean, really, you have no problem with Sony refusing to allow people to play the games they already bought on the PSPgo?

      But in any case, what's unique about the PS3 that the Xbox 360 doesn't have? I can't think of a thing other than the motion sensing controller. Which reviews have all said is a useless gimmick. I remember stories on Slashdot about a game being nearly unplayable because it only used the motion sensing.

      Unless you mean the Yellow Light of Death failures that plague the PS3, which, while unique, aren't exactly the type of thing I'm itching to experience.

    6. Re:Sigh by berashith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly, I dont like Sony, but the PS3 is a unique experience, unavailable from any other vendor. Im probably not going to go out and buy a Sony TV, or cell phone or computer because there is ample competition and thre is nothing really unique about those items.

      there are multiple references to the PS3 as a "unique experience" in this thread. Is there some marketing campaign that I have managed to avoid or are there astroturfers on slashdot?

      oh wait ... it is the same person each time ... who do you work for ?

      AS much as I dislike Sony, Im not going to deny myself a fantastic piece of hardware for it. Im the one who loses, not really Sony. Now i probably wont buy a Sony TV, or pretty much anything else Sony, but the PS3 is a unique experience, with games that cant be had anywhere else.

    7. Re:Sigh by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      not having to pay $100 bucks for a wifi device, not having to spend 20 bucks for a rechargable battery? Free online?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    8. Re:Sigh by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Um when did I say I was addicted to console games? My question was to the people saying "dont buy the PS3 because Sony sucks" Ny point is how can you feel a personal hatred towards one corporation, but turn a blind eye to the other? Personally I don't have any issue with my PS3, but I DO question the sanity of people telling me the PS3 sucks because of a Rootkit on a MUSIC CD from X years ago.

      And since you brought it up first, perhaps you should get psychiatric help for thinking that me buying a console makes me need psychiatric help. Seriously man, it's a console. Sony is not going to murder your family in the middle of the night. Or Nintendo. Or Microsoft.

    9. Re:Sigh by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      I mean, really, you have no problem with Sony refusing to allow people to play the games they already bought on the PSPgo?

      You seriously misinterpreted that comment. What, do you point "astroturfing" at every pro-whatever-you-don't-like poster out there?

    10. Re:Sigh by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

      oh yeah the extremely unique yellow light of death, it's completely unlike the red ring of death... I got a PS3 specifically for bluray and games in 1080p... that's two things that the Xbox 360 doesn't have, and why I chose it over the Microsoft option. The ability to choose what media server I want to connect it to helps too. Throw in the ease of HDD upgrades, (and cost difference in doing so) built in wifi, hdmi output on all models, Bluetooth, so i don't have to purhcase a Microsoft headset, there's ABSOLUTELY nothing different between the two, you're absolutely right. They're the same. They both play games... they have no other features. gotcha... as for the PSPgo? well, it's a different product entirely. should you be mad at them for not allowing the Sony Discman to play cassette tapes as well? or what about the Sony MP3 players not having a built in CD-Reader? I'm not a fanboi, or an astroturfer, I'm a consumer, I made my choice based on factors you ignore, which is your right as a consumer, but it's not right for you to say "what's unique about the PS3" when there are obvious differences besides the controller. and your example of the yellow light of death... very ironic of you to claim that is a unique "feature". very clever, I'd mod that comment +1 for irony.

    11. Re:Sigh by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Well if you have UMD games already, you already have a PSP and thus wouldn't be the intended market for the PSPgo. The PSPgo is intended for those who DON't already have a UMD library and have never owned a PSP. The kind of folks who buy stuff from "app stores" for the cell phones. (though the PSN store predates Apple's App Store)

    12. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want some good console advice? Don't buy one if you are looking for a quality product. Not to sound like a zealot, but with a PC, you choose the quality of the hardware. With a console, you get what they put together which is going to be the absolute least expensive, cut-corner device that they could manage to put together. The consoles have always been years behind PCs for gaming and they still are. I might consider getting one if I had the option of purchasing a reliable, quality unit, but that isn't an option. If you want these companys to sell a better product vote with your wallet and don't buy their crap until they make something worth buying.

    13. Re:Sigh by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      SO now im an astroturfer becasue i applied logic to the problem of how to convert a physical UMD into a digital good. I didnt say they should do X or Y, i merely brought up issues with how such a system would work. Personally i think the PSP Go is an aggressive anti-consumer move to eliminate retailers and consumers from the second hand market, while at the same time cutting the cord to Sony's latest embarrassment of a media standard

      --
      Good-bye
    14. Re:Sigh by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Console exclusives are the unique experiences i was referring to. Cant play Uncharted anywhere else, and it was a thrilling experience. And before you start calling me an astroturfer look at my long history of posting on slashdot. Surprises me that someone with such a relatively low UID would talk such nonsense without looking at my history a bit better. Fuck you, im no shill.

      --
      Good-bye
    15. Re:Sigh by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 1

      To all of the DONT BUY SONY CUZ THEYRE TEH EVILZ can you recommend me which game console to buy?

      Dreamcast. Windows CE looks like ponies and sunshine compared to all this, dunnit?

            --- Mr. DOS

    16. Re:Sigh by ZosX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahhhhh the unique experience of having like 5 good games to play with your shiny black $400 blu-ray player. (1 of which is suprisingly not a sequel) Good thing at least Final Fantasy XIII will redeem your purchase....errr..maybe not. I'd like to give you a unique experience. Drink a little more of that kool aid, kid.

    17. Re:Sigh by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      shit, a 1.03million # UID is low now? I thought I was bad being in the 200k....

      --

      -Bucky
    18. Re:Sigh by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      To all of the DONT BUY SONY CUZ THEYRE TEH EVILZ can you recommend me which game console to buy? Oh and please don't say PC, I game hours a day on my PC but I also like having a console for the console only games. Please tell me which console is not made by an evil corporation and doesn't brick with firmware upgrades? The ROCK SOLID 360? The Wii and it's recent hardware killing firmware too? Guess what, I'm going to buy the console that has the games I want. For me that's the PS3 and soon the Wii.

      How about...none? Everytime you give these guys money, you're pretty much sending a signal that no matter how far they ram it down your throat, you're still willing to put up with it.

      Alternatively, elect some people willing to serve you instead of their corporate overlords that can change your fucked up legal system?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    19. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus. He wasn't talking about his own, you daft twat.

      PAY. FUCKING. ATTENTION.

    20. Re:Sigh by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Um when did I say I was addicted to console games?

      When you said this:

      To all of the DONT BUY SONY CUZ THEYRE TEH EVILZ can you recommend me which game console to buy? Oh and please don't say PC, I game hours a day on my PC but I also like having a console for the console only games. Please tell me which console is not made by an evil corporation and doesn't brick with firmware upgrades?

      The implication is that, somehow, you simply have no choice but to buy a console, and thus you might as well just buy one from an evil corporation 'cuz they all suck.

      Ny point is how can you feel a personal hatred towards one corporation, but turn a blind eye to the other?

      Who's doing that? Last I checked, criticism has been levels at Microsoft and Nintendo right alongside Sony.

      Of course, there's one major difference which, I think, earns Sony extra asshole points: Sony is making owners pay to have their consoles fixed, thus taking their dickishness to a whole new level.

      but I DO question the sanity of people telling me the PS3 sucks because of a Rootkit on a MUSIC CD from X years ago.

      I'm *pretty* sure people are saying *Sony* sucks because of the aforementioned rootkit, and not the PS3. You might want to work on that reading comprehension.

      And before you claim said rootkit was years ago and is no longer relevant: the current speculation is that the PS3 brickage is a consequence of new DRM enforcement software they're adding to the PS3. So Sony is fucking with people's hardware in order to enforce a DRM scheme... that sounds familiar, doesn't it?

    21. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My fucked up legal system? Which country do you believe I live in?

      And what, exactlly, am I putting up with on my PS3? Has it failed? Nope. What's the failure rate of the PS3? The only number I've heard is about 10%. What are they ramming down my throat? Guess what, I'm happy with my PS3.

    22. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you, Karma Chameleon. I'm not even going to mod you down, you're obviously a fucking wanker who isn't worth the time. Nobody made any statement even similar to that "EVERYONES PS3 JUST DIED" (try punctuation marks sometime, incidentally). You're just a fanboy getting all up in arms because somebody dared to insult your poor little PS3. Same thing with the Nintendo vs. Sega nerds "back in the day." You're an ignorant shit and you haven't got a word worth saying. No one gives a fuck what you want to buy. No one gives a fuck about your friends. Maybe someone will care about your e-mail address though, I think it's time the spam bots got a hold of you just for being a shitdick.

      tdoerksen@gmail.com
      tdoerksen@gmail.com
      tdoerksen@gmail.com
      tdoerksen@gmail.com
      tdoerksen@gmail.com
      tdoerksen@gmail.com
      tdoerksen@gmail.com

      By the way, "Doerksen?" Would that be pronounced "dork," per chance? It would certainly explain your sycophant personality.

    23. Re:Sigh by berashith · · Score: 1

      wait, you think that people on slashdot should review other' post histories for evidence of their true beliefs ?!? people on slashdot dont even read the article before declaring every bogus response and counter argument that may be loosely related to the summary.

      you must be new here !

      (btw, this entire comment is a joke, no need to get so angry about some idiot you will never meet , i.e. me)

    24. Re:Sigh by berashith · · Score: 1

      he was referring to mine. This was a back handed compliment like being told you have a big dick for a white guy!

      beat you by ~7k .

    25. Re:Sigh by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

      He said he likes the console for console only games... he games for hours on his pc, but likes the console for the console only games. And I see his point. As for your point "don't buy their crap until they make something worth buying", obviously they did make something he felt was worth buying, certain console only games that aren't available on the PC (God of War anyone?). Or games that come out for PC 2-3 years after they've been on the console. (Metal Gear)

      To argue that the PC is superior is preaching to the choir, I know it is, I also know that I can play games on consoles for a LOT less than I could buy a PC for. that being said I really wish I had a PC capable of playing Fallout 3 on... I'd much prefer the controls on a PC... sadly my old 5 year old P4 3.0 just doesn't cut it anymore. I'm planning on upgrading soon, but my kids need clothes more than I need a new PC... so for a 3rd of the price of a computer to play FO3, I can play it on my PS3, which I got primarily for bluray support and to play a few good games. Also say what you will, consoles make great party machines, easy to launch games as thats what they're designed to do.

    26. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $150 to Sony every time they fuck your console...

  30. donkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    One used to be able to trust the mainstream console makers, but not so much anymore.

    This is why I only play DONKEY.BAS
    All I need is my computer!

    1. Re:donkey by wakingrufus · · Score: 1

      I spent many hours playing that with my cousin as a kid.... great game.

  31. PS3 Giving a Brick a bad name... by DarthVain · · Score: 1, Troll

    Bricks are useful. You can build a house, a fire place, they are strong, good insulators, etc...

    A PS3 after crappy hardware destroying update is useless, except for giving toxins to some poor asshole in a 3rd world country to try an recycle it.

  32. Microsoft? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Any "bios reset" switch would be done on the hardware-vendor level.

    Dell, HP, Apple, [and Nintendo,] are you listening?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  33. Only if your time has no value by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    After all, you spend time and energy getting it fixed. Or does that logic only work for MS-fanboys complaining about Linux?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Only if your time has no value by aicrules · · Score: 1

      I think by being on here discussing the virtues of manufacturer's bricked console responses the implication is that at least some part of your time has little to no value.

  34. Sony trying to play catch-up with Microsoft here.. by Sleepy · · Score: 1

    Maybe Sony is taking a page from Microsoft, and now trying to boost market share.

    Think of it this way:
    1) The XBox360 has between a 50 and 50% hardware fail rate
    2) Many XBox360 users are on their THIRD purchase.

    Because many people will conflate "overall hardware sales" with "installed base", the (till now) higher quality of the PS3 has put Sony at a HUGE DISADVANTAGE.

    It's all about numbers, folks. ;-)

  35. Well, thanks a lot. by X.25 · · Score: 1

    So, I am thinking these days to buy a console. Can't really decide.

    PS3: nice little thing, has overheating problems, and update bricks it. I will love giving money for that.
    Wii: nice little thing. Update bricks it. I will love giving money for that.
    Xbox360: nice little thing. 54% of Xbox360 consoles had a problem (rrod, etc). Heats like crazy, and there is a high chance it'll die within a year. I will love giving money for that.

    What the fuck happened to consoles?

    1. Re:Well, thanks a lot. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      The PS3 - especially the new "slim" model - doesn't have overheating problems. The very first PS3 model had a 90nm CPU and a 90nm GPU - it could run noisy, but not hot. The one I have (originally a 40GB model, I've since bumped up the hard drive) has a 65nm CPU and a 90nm GPU, is pretty quiet, and hasn't given me any hardware problems. The new "slim" model has 45nm parts (producing less heat) and a honking big fan. The big fan means it both moves a lot of air and is quiet.

      I've seen no evidence that there's a big problem with PS3 reliability, and the story about updates 'bricking' are still unsubstantiated. It'll be interesting to see if this guy can actually produce some evidence...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    2. Re:Well, thanks a lot. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      My PS3 is fine after the latest update, as is my PSP. I haven't done the recent Wii update, but its been fine so far. A friend of mine is on his 4th 360. I also have a sony receiver, still working very nicely, an old 36" sony crt tv, more or less working nicely, and a new 52" bravia, which is a pretty awesome tv. Its about two months old, and still working perfectly (although out of the box it wanted to do a 10MB upgrade, which I let it do).

  36. unexpected? I think not. by glebovitz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Several years ago Sony released a rootkit with their CDs that cause major problems for PC users. I haven't bought a Sony product since. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

  37. No, this why you should do TESTING by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Sony goofed, oh, people love to call names and all, but Nintendo recently did EXACTLY the same. It has everything to do with cost cutting and pressuring developers to push new features while cutting testers because it don't accomplish anyway.

    And then you get a bug that slips through you can't just patch in the next version and it all falls apart.

    And we are ALL part of it.

    We go for cheap. The PS3 sold 1 million extra units when it dropped price. We want our airplane tickets as cheap as possible, so we happily accept that the runways are to short if things go wrong and don't even have a runoff area as long as F1 cars get. That is because we value F1 drivers, not ourselves.

    For people who are so confused about the high costs of repairs and spair parts btw. I will tell you that there are TWO kind of products out there:

    The VERY cheap to produce and VERY expensively sold, the frames of glasses. They costs pennies to produce but sell for a hundred or more. So, I have personally ripped them apart, to get a spare screw to ship to a customer. it is CHEAPER to tear one apart then keep all the bits in supply.

    Then there is the very expensive to produce and cheaply sold. Things like laptops. it costs a fortune to replace an LCD because ALL the costs savings that mass production brought to the laptop are lost in stocking and shipping a single part that a fraction of customers will need AND because it is so expensive, even fewer will buy.

    The 360 has an insanely high failure rate, Wii and PS3 have been bricked. PSP had pixel problems. The results of bad engineering trying to cut costs until stuff just falls apart.

    The sad thing is that there is almost no alternative. The consoles are all owned by companies who have long since given up on producing a quality product.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:No, this why you should do TESTING by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      Sony goofed, oh, people love to call names and all, but Nintendo recently did EXACTLY the same. It has everything to do with cost cutting and pressuring developers to push new features while cutting testers because it don't accomplish anyway.

      And then you get a bug that slips through you can't just patch in the next version and it all falls apart.

      And we are ALL part of it.

      We go for cheap. The PS3 sold 1 million extra units when it dropped price. We want our airplane tickets as cheap as possible, so we happily accept that the runways are to short if things go wrong and don't even have a runoff area as long as F1 cars get. That is because we value F1 drivers, not ourselves.

      For people who are so confused about the high costs of repairs and spair parts btw. I will tell you that there are TWO kind of products out there:

      The VERY cheap to produce and VERY expensively sold, the frames of glasses. They costs pennies to produce but sell for a hundred or more. So, I have personally ripped them apart, to get a spare screw to ship to a customer. it is CHEAPER to tear one apart then keep all the bits in supply.

      Then there is the very expensive to produce and cheaply sold. Things like laptops. it costs a fortune to replace an LCD because ALL the costs savings that mass production brought to the laptop are lost in stocking and shipping a single part that a fraction of customers will need AND because it is so expensive, even fewer will buy.

      The 360 has an insanely high failure rate, Wii and PS3 have been bricked. PSP had pixel problems. The results of bad engineering trying to cut costs until stuff just falls apart.

      The sad thing is that there is almost no alternative. The consoles are all owned by companies who have long since given up on producing a quality product.

      That's what I nowadays think: that part of the testing which should happen in the final production phase, is skipped and left to the customers. If 95% would've happened to have passed that test at the factory, then without that testing the units would've shipped and 5% replaced after testing by the customer (a tad more because 5% of the replaced units wouldn't function, had to be replaced et cetera, you get my point). If the replacement-costs are less than the testing-costs, there's profit. And most of the time, the customer _wants_ that product so will be annoyed by the initial bad product, but delighted (cough) by the gracious and swift product replacement.

      Note: replacement-costs are costs of Customer Service and Shipping, the costs of the defective units would've occurred in the factory as well and can be left out of the equation.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  38. His PS3 might have been used!!! by medsource · · Score: 1, Informative

    If I read the .pdf of the class action correctly, the plaintiff bought their now malfunctioning PS3 in Jan 2009 (no mention of new, only that it was for several hundred dollars) and the update was in Sept 2009... that's less than a year and this should be covered by the warranty (not for $150 which is the standard price for out of warranty repairs). It would appear that the PS3 in question was used and over a year old. Who knows what that particular unit's history was??? Methinks there's more to this than just bugs in the code (which could be there). Oh, and I have 3.0 and 3.0.1 on a PS3 20GB (launch Nov 2006) and a new Slim that are running just fine (anecdotal I know).

    --
    all bleeding stops... eventually.
  39. This is ridiculous by Bureaucromancer · · Score: 1

    One day someone will design a machine that lets the user restore screwed up firmware externally. It really shouldn't be hard, just have something in a physical ROM chip that will load a firmware installer from a USB drive without needing working firmware or system software to do it. Quite frankly it is shameful that this keeps happening, screwed up firmware updates are a pretty obvious failure, and one that should be resolvable without an RTM. Keep it mind it's not even just consoles that this happens to. I've heard stories of just about every piece of hardware that has firmware doing this at one time or another. For that matter my freaking mobo has a warning on it that screwing up a firmware update will brick the board. Sadly I can only think of one computer that actually DOES allow recovery from corrupted firmware, and that, of all thing, is the Lego RCX (a little 8 bit machine built into a Lego brick that you can build robots with), and I actually wonder in retrospect if what they call firmware was actually just some system software.

  40. Re:emergency reset./unbrick circuit aka service mo by skydyr · · Score: 1

    This is why computers, smart phones, and other BIOS-updateable machines should have a "service mode."

    Set the "service mode" jumper and the machine boots to a ROM which does nothing but load new firmware from a known location.

    The problem with this is that it makes firmware replacement trivial, and while you and I might be interested in doing this, Sony, Nintendo, et al. are most certainly against our doing so.

  41. FUD? by Dreadrik · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's amazing how this is blown completely out of proportion.

    The story itself is inaccurate and misleading. The users affected were having trouble with their blu-ray drives after the 3.0 update. There is no bricking involved. The 3.01 update was never meant to fix the problems with the blu-ray drives, it fixed a problem with stability in Uncharted.
    Wether the update caused the blu-ray problems or not is only speculation. One user said his player started working again after reformating his hard-drive and reinstalling the 3.0 update, so it might be the case, but it might also be coincidence.

    The "1000's of users" statement is completely bull****, and is a number completely drawn out of the plaintiffs a**.

    It strikes me that these reports (and the british Yellow Light of Death TV-programme) started spreading precisely when the PS3 Slim was announced and the PS3 price drop took effect. It feels like a well crafted FUD campain.

    1. Re:FUD? by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 1

      I can personally submit to the firmware disabling my system. It didn't 'brick' my system, but it 3.0 caused connectivity issues in online games, and 3.01 broke the DVD and Blu-Ray playback, as well as well continued online problems, caused freezing in games, and left me unable to exit the XMB if I ever brought it up in a game. Sony told me it would be $150 for a system that worked perfect before the updates. Even after arguing that it was their firmware. They said I couldn't prove it, blah, blah, blah... Fortunately, a user fix got my system back in order, by 'rebuilding the database' in less than 10 minutes. So, yeah fuck Sony. Even if it wasn't intentional, this is not good business practice.

    2. Re:FUD? by Dreadrik · · Score: 1

      So it seems you had some file system corruption then? A firmware update is probably a disk intensive operation, and might explain why it got worse after the second update. Maybe your harddrive is malfunctioning? I've had PC's behave like this before the harddrive crashed. Make sure you back up your savegames.

      What I'm trying to say is that with 20-something million PS3's sold, a certain number of them will break - every day. Some of them will break coinciding with firmware upgrades. Maybe an unknown bug in their firmware caused your system failure, but statistically it could also be a hardware fault, especially a harddrive failure.

    3. Re:FUD? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      sounds more like hardware failure to me. Has your PS3 been getting adequate ventilation? You don't have it sitting in an enclose cabinet without vent holes or sitting on this plush carpet with a towel over it to muffle the fan noise do you?

    4. Re:FUD? by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's a hard drive failure. I've had no problems before or since with any of my save files. (Well, with the exception of Soul Calibur IV saves last year, which went away after replacing the disk). I think it's fair to assume some people's systems might have had defects that crept up at the same time of the firmware. However, there are a lot of people on Sony's own forums, with claiming problems that arrived with the firmware. I'm proof positive that the firmware has at least something to do with some of them. Nintendo's accepting responsibility over the latest Wii update bricking systems is pretty good proof that firmware can cause this. And the Wii doesn't have as many hardware variants as PS3 does. I didn't experience YLOD (fortunately) but let's face it, if something gets screwed up with the system's firmware, it could create all sorts of errors that could look like hardware failure. At the very least Sony could've offered me basic troubleshooting (like 'rebuilding the database') which could've resolved things quicker and without the $150 insult. But again, they explicitly said "There's no troubleshooting for this problem." @ CronoCloud (590650) My PS3 is kept in a well ventilated area, and is actually runs quite quietly, especially compared to the 360.

  42. Re:emergency reset./unbrick circuit aka service mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with this is that it makes firmware replacement trivial, and while you and I might be interested in doing this, Sony, Nintendo, et al. are most certainly against our doing so.

    Not really. It would be easy enough for them to put some DRM crap in the ROM, so it would only load a new version of the firmware if that version is correctly signed.

    (Of course, it's possible that the ROM implementation might have bugs, but I don't think that qualifies as making firmware replacement trivial. :))

  43. My 3.0-3.01 Firmware Story by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can 100% attest to the fact that the PS3 update 3.0 and 3.01 did indeed disable my system. My system (a 60GB) worked flawlessly for 2 years until 3.0, which caused issues in regard to getting into games online. 3.01 broke dvd, and blu-ray playback, and caused freezing issues with the XMB which you couldn't exit while playing a game if accessed. I called Sony, they told me there was no troubleshooting for the issue and it would $150. I spoke to a supervisor, who in so many words said. 1) You can't prove it was the firmware. 2) Even if it was the firmware, we accept Sony takes no responsibility as per terms of the agreement when we download the firmware. Of course, we're force to agree to this 'agreement' when we're forced to download the firmware. Anyway, I consulted Sony's own forums which were ablaze with complaints. A user fix 'rebuild the database' fixed my system in less than 10 minutes. So here is my proof that the firmware did indeed disable at least some systems.

    1. Re:My 3.0-3.01 Firmware Story by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sounds more likely that you were having hard drive problems and that it's not a firmware issue, other than the firmware not being saved on the HD properly and getting corrupted or somesuch.

    2. Re:My 3.0-3.01 Firmware Story by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never had any hard drive issues, prior or since the issue began. None of my saved data has been affected on the hard drive. No further issues since the problems were resolved. The firmware (both 3.0, and 3.01) seemed to smoothly download and install without any issue or hiccups, and I've never had a problem with any previous firmware updates since I had the system since Fall 2007. Keep in mind too, Sony offered no troubleshooting, and this problem (in my case) could've been easily resolved in less than 10 minutes. Instead, they were quite eager to demand $150 for a repair that took merely a couple of button presses. To me, it's clear this problem goes beyond a handful of people whose breakdowns coincided at the same time of the update.

  44. Sony should follow Nintendo's practice by Giltron · · Score: 1

    When I updated my Wii (bought in 2007) to 4.2 , Nintendo had no issues sending my a replacement console right away (free of charge). My warranty ran out in 2008. My only beef was I had never done a back-up so I lost all my save data.

    1. Re:Sony should follow Nintendo's practice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Sony should support its customers for free on this. It was their fault for releasing an update that was not well tested

  45. Brand Loyalty: A Love Hate Relationship... by Xin+Jing · · Score: 1

    Your ex analogy hits the mark, often times with brand loyalty there's are feelings of attachment and personal support. The company's been there for you and like a woebegone lover, the company you have stuck by for years with fond memories leaves you on the lurch holding the proverbial bag full of abandoned leftovers.

    I had a similar experience years ago with a Sony Mini Disc player that just "quit working". I didn't drop it, spill anything on it or mistreat it. As a consumer product it fit that perfect niche and at the time, was fairly cutting edge. I felt betrayed, abandoned, angry and frustrated. Any attempt reconcile would have surely proved to be an exercise in wasted resources. And like the former significant other, you end up hanging on to the unusable wreckage in hopes of it someday being repaired or replaced. Each time you open the drawer or box and take stock of the random components it's a sad reminder that once there was something useful and beautiful where only disappointment and obsolescence remains.

    It's a strange thing brand loyalty, where the highs are heavenly and the lows are disdainful. We let their name roll off of our tongues as a trusted endorsement or spit it venomously as a perilous warning.

  46. $150 repair fee per unit by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    When it was THEIR fault?? Well gotta admit that takes balls...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  47. I got bricked by Lepton68 · · Score: 1

    It happened to me. I have an original 60GB PS3. One day it says there is a system update, just like all the previous ones. Press a button to download it, start it off, it gets halfway through, then the screen goes black, and game over. Nothing would revive it, not switching hard disks, not the service menu options, nothing. I do believe it broke something in the hard disk interface somehow. I ended up buying a new slim PS3, but I am very upset since my old PS3 had hardware backward compatibility, one of the main reasons I bought the thing, as I have many PS2 games.

    --
    Mike from www.myallo.com/blog
  48. Stupid is as Stupid does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are stupid enough to get rooted then you deserver what you get. Besides that happened FOUR years ago, why to hold a grudge.

  49. May I just say: by Loomismeister · · Score: 0

    This particular story is inspiring some of the most hilarious comments I've ever read!

  50. Yet another reason... by woboyle · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason to boycott Sony. The cassette deck I purchased about 5 years ago is probably the last penny that Sony will ever get out of me.

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  51. RROD by windex82 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the fanboys will no longer be able to use their only reason to argue the ps3 is better then the xbox? Its not quite the same thing as the RROD problem but at least MS provided free, prompt, replacement (including shipping) and even extended warranties to cover the units they were expecting to fail at some point in the future.

  52. On a GAME CONSOLE? Shouldn't happen. by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a software engineer, I feel some sympathy for those who release patches for desktop computer OSes. A computer is a general-purpose device that is intended to allow users to install third-party applications that have full access to a huge API; to install applications like antivirus utilities that dig deep into the OS; and add hardware and the low-level drivers that go with them. The OS update is applied to an environment that may have wandered far from its starting point. Every customer has a unique configuration that probably has meaningful differences from any box in the SQA department.

    But a game console? A game console is a walled garden, the applications need only a circumscribed set of functions, the vendor has total control over what goes on it, and nobody is adding third-party hardware to it.

    Sony should be ashamed of itself, and should have volunteered to fix damaged systems for free--long before anyone complained.

    1. Re:On a GAME CONSOLE? Shouldn't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your notion of what a game console is seems a bit outdated...

      In just about every way except for the fact that it presents a more limited interface and doesn't allow installation of software, modern consoles are fairly similar to general purpose computer with limited expansion options (a laptop).

      Additionally, the hardware is cheap, I'm pretty sure there is no ECC...so any firmware upgrade done by sufficiently many people will result in some subset getting screwed over by a bit flipped in between verifying the checksum for the firmware and writing it.

      I have no idea what happened here; it's kind of difficult to determine because if everyone with a certain model were affected, many more units would've been broken. It's kind of hard to imagine what kind of bug could cause only some units of a certain model to break.

  53. Sony, Microsoft, Verizon, RIAA by gearloos · · Score: 1

    What do Sony, Microsoft, and Verizon, and the RIAA have in common? They all just don't get it. Plain and simple, they don't give a rats ass for the customer base. Don't care if a product works, Don't care about your privacy, Don't care if you get screwed, and apparently don't care if you will be a return customer. The have "Brand Bling" and don't need you. I would also add Direct TV to that list. Screw them all.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  54. Re:emergency reset./unbrick circuit aka service mo by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    The PS3 has one:

    hold down the power button as you power it up until you hear three beeps. Since none of the "ZOMG Evil Sony's evil update Bricks0red my PS3" people in this thread mention using it, they might not even know about it.

  55. A brick IS very stable by dr2chase · · Score: 1

    So overall, yes, they did improve stability.

  56. What the story is by Glasswire · · Score: 1

    Sorry, the bricking itselft is part of the story. PC manufacturers moved to a 2-phase process for BIOS/fimware updates where a backup copy is in place in case of failure in the update. Console manf wouldn't dream of adding that extra 40 cents or so to their BOM (bill of materials) cost so bricking is possible there. Haven't heard of a bricked PC in 5-10 years.

    1. Re:What the story is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't heard of a bricked PC in 5-10 years.

      That's because you can't post on Slashdot if you brick your PC.

  57. Also, sony's been at this a while by Minimalist360 · · Score: 1

    As I posted back here.

    Why not just develop a model off it - update players, generate a number between 1 an 3500, if it's 7, disable the blu-ray drive. With say 5 million Ps3s out there, that's an extra $250k in revenue every release, it trickles in so it can't be tied to any one release, and there ya have it. Free monies.

    I almost lit my Ps3 on fire and put the video of said arson on youtube, now I'm glad I waited, maybe they'll repair it for free after all. Bastards.

    1. Re:Also, sony's been at this a while by Minimalist360 · · Score: 1
  58. ROTTEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the langue in this post isn't good even for adults that are senitive to filthy words

  59. Depends on what you use it for... by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    I use it to play games off disk, period. Since the BD no longer functions, that's pretty much bricked for me.

    1. Re:Depends on what you use it for... by Knara · · Score: 1

      But it's not "for you". It's "does the machine not boot up?" If the answer is "yes", then it is bricked. If it is "no" then it's broken.

      In short, if it could be fixed by another software patch (as seems to be indicated in more than a few cases), or even by a non-firmware component replacement it isn't bricked.

  60. Oh goodie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A chance to give half a dozen law firms a bunch of money, and for me to get $10 on the settlement.

  61. Re:Time to make the feds earn their money. by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1

    http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/consumer.shtm
    This falls under federal jurisdiction because of the intertubes were used as a delivery method.

    --
    open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
  62. a Sony warranty is like 90 days by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Why didn't you just wait for the warranty to expire and then pay the $130 instead of $180? Or say it's grey market it has no warranty?

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  63. Consoles? Ads? WTF! by Amnenth · · Score: 1

    Why the hell are consoles serving ads? I never had much desire to pick up a PS3/X360, but what little there was just plummeted.

    1. Re:Consoles? Ads? WTF! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      They aren't really "ads" in the traditional sense. X360 has a sort of featured games/videos section, and some videos you can opt to download for trailers. It's promotional but it's a stretch to call them an ad - as the op says, they're actually useful.

  64. Re:Copy protection by Kuukai · · Score: 1

    Uh, actually, 3.00, as might be indicated by the "point oh oh," was a pretty massive overhaul. Any PS3 owner noticed this at bootup, it's not that big a secret. The thing already has all the DRM it needs, this was probably a failed bugfix or something. Still, they seriously need to learn from their mistakes: the PS3 has a pretty good firmware backup system, and botched versions have already slipped past it twice. Not much of a failsafe... Is the difference between configs/models that hard to account for?

    --
    Sendou Wave Kick!!
  65. You break it, you bought it... by meerling · · Score: 1

    Or in this case, your official update compromised and/or disabled my console.
    Therefore you are going to fix it, and smile as you say "no charge - sorry for the inconvenience" while you pray to the marketing gods that I continue to support your company...

    Now that I reread that, it sounds somewhat egotistical and condescending. Of course, this is Sony, so it's probably best to use language they understand...

  66. Check this out! by BlackBloq · · Score: 0

    The sony playstaion official page is dripping with sarcasm and deeper in the posts are not moderated. Deeper in you see people saying games even crash and freeze now! http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/08/playstation-3-firmware-v3-00-update/comment-page-40/#comments

  67. Cut Sony some slack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a recession. A corporation has to make a few bucks where it can.

  68. re-boycott Sony! by xycadium · · Score: 1

    I boycotted Sony for several years after the rootkit incident. Then, I started buying Sony products again (I bought my first PS2, brand new, this last December). Now I see an article like this and I believe it's time to stop buying all Sony products for another couple of years. Business practices like this are just unacceptable and a class action lawsuit is never proper punishment for actions such as these. Will everyone just get a $5 off coupon for their next console purchase? No, I think everyone should just stop buying Sony products until the company requires a Japanese gov 'save our ass because we're a horrible company, please' payout.

  69. Stability by imakemusic · · Score: 1

    I guessed it did improve the average PS3 stability by a kind of survival of the stabilist.

    --
    Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!