For one ting its not a dongle (my submission was better) - for the other apparently hundreds get hacked each their, their character stripped bare and sold, and their accounts used to spam gold commercials in the game and on the web boards.
Either they are not replying at all or so slow you can invade a smaller country for no reason except for doing it while you wait - so I'm not really interested in their opinion
"Just as your right to swing your fist stops where it meets my nose, your right to free speech is not absolute. "
It's a bullshit comparison, free speech is not absolute because too many corrupt people try to suppress it - but it should be.
"Further, if you had checked the site in question, you would read text like:
''The catalyst for this site is a shady and morally bankrupt accountant named Michael Stiassny...''
which is clearly defamatory,"
It's not clearly anything - you are clearly just prejudiced. It could be defamatory if its not true, but considering the number of websites pointing out the court has ignored proof that this guy lied under oath, that two of his former employees sit on the court, that he does business with the spouse of the Supreme Court Chief Justice and that there have been many formal complaints of gross financial misconduct which have been buried in committees an honest outside observer would start to think there could something to it.
"and therefore reasonable grounds for a suit and/or requesting a cease-and-desist order."
Bullshit. "shady and morally bankrupt" is so vague an opinion that no serious court should do anything about that.
"So... you can get off your high horse now. "
Someone has to fight on the side of light -now that you wont.
This is just another inept move designed for PR not actually use since it has no effect on those spreading this kind of material. You would have to ban computers to prevent the electronic spread of such things - and then they would spread it on paper instead.
Slashdot Mirror
For one ting its not a dongle (my submission was better) - for the other apparently hundreds get hacked each their, their character stripped bare and sold, and their accounts used to spam gold commercials in the game and on the web boards.
As for requiring it, no - the couldn't do that.
I know, but there comes a time where for all practical purposes you have to stop being metaphysical and accept that that cigar IS a cigar.
Nobody goes to Mcdonalds because they saw a commercial. They go there because they once happened to walk past one and liked the smell.
"It also reduces my electric bill, which means more money in my pocket. "
And less for the electric company, meaning if enough people do this, they will start to increase the price to compensate.
They could just mod you down instead!
It's not under debate by the real scientists. Funny people still try to spin that.
"Long live the constitution of the USA. It's ours collectively as a nation. If you don't like it's rules, go somewhere else."
That would work if you didn't actually interfere in all other countries. If you didn't, I'd be fine with you doing what you wanted.
Are you saying there should be a right to shoot children? Sounds like a good idea, they are making a terrible noise (the children!)
Should the country wish to grow up.
When they show it on youtube and its crappy resolution!
Try http://vreel.net/ or something.
I don't want a vcr that i am supposed to make faces at! I want to be able to give it the finger and have it know what i mean - that would be nifty.
Either they are not replying at all or so slow you can invade a smaller country for no reason except for doing it while you wait - so I'm not really interested in their opinion
The joke is that he HAS gone to heaven! ;)
No - sum it up.
The information is made available under certain licensing rules which they are breaking.
I see wikipedia is fighting it already - good thing. Keep the amoral wolves at bay.
"bla bla bla"
Boils down to: They are greedy and wrong.
"Slander and defamation are not crimes when what is said is true."
Sure they are - if you can pay enough lawyers to get a different verdict. Which was his point.
"Just as your right to swing your fist stops where it meets my nose, your right to free speech is not absolute. "
It's a bullshit comparison, free speech is not absolute because too many corrupt people try to suppress it - but it should be.
"Further, if you had checked the site in question, you would read text like:
''The catalyst for this site is a shady and morally bankrupt accountant named Michael Stiassny...''
which is clearly defamatory,"
It's not clearly anything - you are clearly just prejudiced. It could be defamatory if its not true, but considering the number of websites pointing out the court has ignored proof that this guy lied under oath, that two of his former employees sit on the court, that he does business with the spouse of the Supreme Court Chief Justice and that there have been many formal complaints of gross financial misconduct which have been buried in committees an honest outside observer would start to think there could something to it.
"and therefore reasonable grounds for a suit and/or requesting a cease-and-desist order."
Bullshit. "shady and morally bankrupt" is so vague an opinion that no serious court should do anything about that.
"So... you can get off your high horse now. "
Someone has to fight on the side of light -now that you wont.
Just asking, since I wouldn't know about such things.
This is just another inept move designed for PR not actually use since it has no effect on those spreading this kind of material. You would have to ban computers to prevent the electronic spread of such things - and then they would spread it on paper instead.
Are you saying the democrats are in favor of having an evil corrupt president? Is that because they aspire to get one of their own?
Its a blog.
Just read the instructions.
Just another proof that copyright is amoral and must be rescinded