Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Introduces One-Time Password Devices For WoW

An anonymous reader writes "Two days ago Blizzard announced that they will be selling keychain tokens to add one-time password support (FAQ) to World of Warcraft. Have compromised World of Warcraft accounts become such a serious problem, that OTPs are already neccesary for games?"

271 comments

  1. Not a problem... an opportunity by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have compromised World of Warcraft accounts become such a serious problem, that OTPs are already neccesary for games?


    Probably more like Blizzard has decided that people paranoid about having their accounts compromised have become such a serious market segment that it can eke out a few more pennies selling these dongles for 6 euros a pop.

    If it was a huge problem, Blizzard would begin requiring them. The fact that they're optional means they're probably just a new way to sap a few more bucks from players who have invested so much of their time and being into this game that six euros seems a very reasonable security blanket.

    1. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Morlark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Eke out a few more pennies"? These things cost way more than $6 to make, and that's not even counting the cost of the traning all their customer support staff will need. Players whose accounts have been compromised do cost Blizzard a lot in terms of support, and Blizzard are introducing these things under cost in an attempt to lower their expenditures elsewhere.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    2. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by mwilli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blizzard is in a unique position. Due to the success of WoW, they are probably the top company for online gameplay at the moment. Because of this, it gives them the opportunity to be the industry leader in new technologies to protect the integrity of the online gameplay, which they have always marketed as being a great concern of theirs.

      --
      My sig beat up your sig.
    3. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. There's no real reason to get it. Whenever an account is hacked, Blizzard will restore all your items and gold to your character in a few days. Unlike with scams that gain access to your bank account, there is no real irreversible damage here. If Blizzard would not restore your items, I could see the appeal of this device, but from what I've read they're pretty good at helping those with hacked accounts. Nonetheless, I think this will sell well. Anyone who frequents the WoW forums knows that "keylogger" is a popular fad, often jokingly posted after a user links to a website. Whenever accounts are hacked, the account will often post spam on the forums linking to keyloggers, used to hack more accounts. While playing in-game, I've met people who have large misconceptions about how hacks are done. I wouldn't call it a "fear", but the threat of being hacked or keylogged is something that many players are concerned about.

    4. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A cancelled account of mine got hacked somehow, and I only discovered it months later when I went to reactivate it. Blizzard basically said "sucks to be you, we won't do anything". My first level 60 character is gone forever, which makes me kind of sad.

      Blizzard will, apparently, not fix all problems.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    5. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, No - they don't. Especially if you talk about thausands of pieces. More like $1.99 per piece, including IP-licenses.

      If Blizzard really plans to have every subscriber own such a piece, the total price to market per unit would probably drop to half a dollar.
      Especially if they are made in china.

    6. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey were you the subject of a Dilbert comic a while back?

    7. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by pipatron · · Score: 5, Funny

      These things cost way more than $6 to make

      Yes, maybe if you handcraft them in Norway from reindeer horns and freshly clubbed seal, but in the rest of the world you can buy a USB memory for less than this.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    8. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's weird, happened to me too. I hadn't been using the account and the game was no longer installed on my machine, I'm not sure what happened. I only found out when I was notified my account had been disabled for cheating.

    9. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      This is in no way new. My mother has been a telecommuter for almost a decade and has been using something like this for VPN connections for years.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    10. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Tridus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Depends on who is making them.

      http://www.entrust.com/strong-authentication/identityguard/calculator.cfm

      Entrust here likes to advertise they're 1/7th as expensive as the ones RSA sells, and those are still $4/year.

      So at $6 until the token dies, Blizzard isn't exactly making a mint on these things. The profit for them comes in reduced account restorations.

      Unless you'd care to source me someone who sells them so cheap that Blizzard is making a fortune at these prices, since there's probably also costs for the server end of the setup?

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    11. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by ShadowDrgn · · Score: 4, Informative

      My account got compromised a year after I quit, and I only discovered it because I got an IM from someone who saw my character log in and wanted to know if I was playing again. My password was good enough that no one was going to randomly guess it, and I certainly never gave it out.

      My best theory on how it happened is that I used the same account and password on lots of web forums, many of which have terrible security. Someone probably hacked into one of them and tried all the user/pass combos to see if they were also WoW accounts. I took a look at my old characters on armory and noticed that my lowbie alts had been stripped and my main moved to another server. I figure whoever got access probably sold the account to a clueless buyer because I can't imagine someone paying for a character transfer otherwise. I also wouldn't be surprised if people made a lot of money doing this. Lesson learned: use unique passwords (or usernames) on any accounts you actually care about.

      Blizzard reset my password, but refused to transfer my character back to his original server because I "willingly gave out my password." I didn't intend to ever play again anyway, but service like that certainly sealed it. They didn't care one bit about catching the person who did it either, despite having IP addresses and even credit card numbers.

    12. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Manip · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thank you Mr. Conspiracy theory. But the truth is that:
      - There is a serious problem in WoW
      - It is extremely common for accounts to get compromised
      - Sometimes people quit the game after a breakin (-$13/month)
      - A 30 second google search found similar devices for between $17 and $23 a go

      If I had to guess I would imagine Blizzard breaks even roughly on these devices. I can't imagine there being a huge profit margin on $6 and that they justify it by keeping people playing.

    13. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      training all their customer support staff will need.

      Training?

      Have you ever phoned/emailed tech support? Not just blizzards, anywhere at all.

      When was the last time you got somebody who could tell their ass from their elbow? When was the last time you got something other than generic canned responses that had nothing what so ever to do with your problem? Isn't it great fun when you can call up tech support and then have to correct them about a technical issue?

      Training for their staff will consist of adding a few more canned responses on how to configure the device, yea that cost them lots.

    14. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Mascot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blizzard will restore all your items and gold to your character in a few days. Unlike with scams that gain access to your bank account, there is no real irreversible damage here

      Unless Blizzard has changed policies, they will refund your items, they will not refund your gold.

      And even so, it can take Blizzard several weeks to find time to sort you out. A tiny one-time cost of 6 euros is extremely cheap investment. Most make that much while taking a crap at work. Small price to pay to protect hundreds and hundreds of hours worth of in-game effort.

      One might argue that with the amount of cash Blizzard makes off of WoW, they should just hire a small country to be able to fix hacked accounts in hours instead of weeks. But, honestly... It's optional. It's 6 euros. My computer is nearly a fortress compared to the average WoW player's security, and I'm still considering getting one of those things.

    15. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, maybe if you handcraft them in Norway from reindeer horns and freshly clubbed seal, but in the rest of the world you can buy a USB memory for less than this.


      Silliness aside, I think the person you responded to probably meant Blizzard's purchase price. For each device you build you have to compute and program the private key, then you have to record this key on a CD or in some other form to deliver to the customer (Blizzard in this case, not the end user), and additionally Blizzard then have to license the software to run it all and set it all up. It's possible Blizzard may have been able to negotiate a decent price for the token, but I think they would be selling them at a loss on the assumption that at a loss of (say) $20 per token, they'll save that much in sorting out the mess that becomes of 'stolen' accounts.

    16. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Or the admin of said web forums used the user/pass combo or sold it. Thats why, if you really want a generic password for forums you may never visit again, you always have that SEPARATE from anything else. Very easy security that nobody pays attention to, as they never think that when they sign up for a random website, they are trusting the password to the admin of that website.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    17. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was 6 euro a year, considerably more than $6.

    18. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by rthomanek · · Score: 1

      Probably more like Blizzard has decided [...] it can eke out a few more pennies selling these dongles for 6 euros a pop.

      Are you serious? If Blizzard wanted to make money on it, they'd sell it for 60 EUR, not 6 EUR -- you know what the prices are in Europe, you know they could, if they wanted to.

      I guess we will see.. as the FAQ page says, the prices is subject to change...

    19. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by WK2 · · Score: 0

      I'm a North Pole Elf you insensitive clod!

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    20. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Splab · · Score: 1

      I used to be an avid Gnome user, and I still find KDE to have some major annoyances, but one thing that I really love is Kwallet (yes you can use that on gnome as well, but its greatly integrated into KDE).

      When you visit a new forum use mkpasswd or anything like it, drop it into kwallet and you don't have to worry about such problems (do remember to keep a backup of kwallet files though :-) )

    21. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by NightRain · · Score: 1

      I too had my inactive account hacked and re-activated. I found out because I got an email telling me my account had been banned days before I was planning on reactivating it. After many back and forths between me and Blizzard support, I got them to unban the account, but I could not get them to tell me what state my character was in or if they would be willing to restore my stuff if it was gone. They told me to raise an ingame ticket with a GM. I wasn't going to sink money in to re-activing an account that /may/ have been levelled against my will (I was only level 48) and /may/ be able to get my gear back. They wouldn't even look in to it, so I just never bothered re-subscribing.

    22. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by leenks · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or you could just use Gnome Keyring
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Keyring

    23. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless Blizzard has changed policies, they will refund your items, they will not refund your gold.

      Technically they are not obligated to restore anything, neither legally nor by their own policies. They often do because it is good customer service and keeps the addicts feeding at the trough, which helps their bottom line in the long run. While they have by far the largest market segment in the MMO genre they know the reasons why that is the case and what will hurt that. Not helping customers is shooting themselves in the foot. I know several people who were shit out of luck after being hacked, while most did receive an account restoration. Often they received some, but not all, of their gold back. One guy had unrestricted access to our guild bank, and Blizzard restored the items in the bank the gold farmer took, too. They actually restored duplicates of some of the items, and let us keep the duplicates. That was really cool of them.

      And even so, it can take Blizzard several weeks to find time to sort you out. A tiny one-time cost of 6 euros is extremely cheap investment. Most make that much while taking a crap at work. Small price to pay to protect hundreds and hundreds of hours worth of in-game effort.

      Yeah, $6 is not a lot of money. With current gas prices this dongle costs 75% of my daily round-trip to work, or just about the same amount as lunch does if I buy a $5 sub at Subway with a drink. Given this is a one-time expense, it is trivial in the grand scheme of things.

      One might argue that with the amount of cash Blizzard makes off of WoW, they should just hire a small country to be able to fix hacked accounts in hours instead of weeks. But, honestly... It's optional. It's 6 euros. My computer is nearly a fortress compared to the average WoW player's security, and I'm still considering getting one of those things.

      Maybe the dongle costs more than $6 to manufacture, key inject, support on the back-end (authentication systems need some retooling). Maybe it costs less. However, the big picture here is that there are other hidden costs to Blizzard the scope of which we can only speculate. Regardless, it will probably mitigate some of the costs of investigating account issues, the headaches involved, etc. allowing their employees to focus their efforts on more pressing issues such as the gold spammers that stand between the bank and auction house in places like Ironforge or Orgrimmar and constantly peddle their wares (stolen video game gold).

      I am considering this product as well. I used to play the game constantly because of marital problems. I needed a place to hide from my wife that did not involve huge bar tabs. So I played WoW. A lot. I have multiple 70s, thousands of gold, epics, blah blah blah. Now that I am divorced I play a fraction of the time. However, whether I keep playing (even if a small amount of time) or cancel my subscription, the thought of someone gaining access and destroying all that hard work would hurt. I spent a lot of time building up the account, made a lot of friends (some of my guild mates live close and we have actually socialized in real life), and anyone hurting those social connections or anything else would really piss me off. I think $6 may be worth it to mitigate that risk.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    24. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Or just use Firefox which works seamlessly with most websites.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    25. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My best theory on how it happened is that I used the same account and password on lots of web forums, many of which have terrible security.

      There is your problem.

      I know we are all lazy when it comes to passwords, but you really need to keep different passwords for different things. It doesn't mean you have to keep completely different passwords for everyone forums so my personal rule is to have levels on how much I care about it being breached.

      Level 1: Random forums I don't trust or places I don't care if hacked.
      Level 2: Places I frequent that I trust and have a reputation, but its not going to kill me if my account is breached.
      Level 3: Stuff I pay money for. Like Online Games, Steam, utility bills, and cell phone plans.
      Level 4: Money. Banks. Credit cards. And/or anything that is serious business. This also includes email accounts attached to them which I keep completely separate passwords between accounts since it would be dumb to have the same password for your bank as your email. Also I tend to keep different passwords between financial institutions because I don't trust competency of employees and their laptops.

      The goal is to never use the same password between the levels so if one is breached the others are not.

      So if it is that important to you, then don't use the same passwords on untrusted sites or forums that use unpatched vBulletin or PHPbb. I mean... I don't even trust Slashdot.

      And it never hurts to paranoid and change your passwords every 6 months or if you just suspect something. Its not going to cost you anything other than mental exercise if your wrong, but it saves you a whole lot of grief if you are right.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    26. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Krneki · · Score: 0

      Hacking into poor protected web sites / forums is one of the best way to get your passwords. Never use the same password for random sites and for stuff you really care.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    27. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a player I'd have to agree completely. I've witnessed a hacker take over my friends account...we "chatted" lets say. My friend was completely distraught. As to the root of the issue I have to say it's a Windows security problem...or lack of security. I'll agree most people aren't that security conscience, but Windows allows for programs to be installed on its platform without administrative level consent or knowledge and that is just plain weird to me. The real issue is the OS not the game which resides in the OS.

    28. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Splab · · Score: 1

      Firefox doesn't per default encrypt your passwords, and you are storing the passwords somewhere else than where everything else is stored compared to kwallet or the gnome thing.

    29. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Alibaba10100 · · Score: 1

      Implementing an OTP system is pretty pricey. Paypal loses money selling their footballs at $5. Blizzard would have to price them pretty high to turn a significant profit. Maybe they're doing it to protect themselves from liability. If you feel your account was worth $5 million and it gets stolen, they can make a better case in court that they took all reasonable security precautions.

    30. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Alibaba10100 · · Score: 1

      Not only are they not encrypted, but they are easily accessible from the preferences menu. I don't think most people realize that anyone sitting at their computer can see all their firefox passwords unless they password protect them.

    31. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      tokenless see www.telesign.com

    32. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Toridas · · Score: 1

      If the article had actually linked to the US webpage instead of the European one you would see that they are only $6.50.

    33. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Blizzard's page says its $6.50 to buy it, and doesn't say anything about an annual fee. Got a link?

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    34. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From the years playing MMOs the majority of hacks on accounts relate to the following.
      - A ex-SO or friend upset with you.
      - Sharing your password with your clan.
      - Overly obvious passwords.

      After that the two common ones are.
      - Installing third party programs.
      - Clan phishing.

      Clan phishing by works be joining a clan, getting friendly with them then posting a joke/quiz where the people answer with questions like "Mothers last maiden name, "Date of birth", etc. They use that to hack mail accounts.

    35. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      I didn't even consider not encrypting them.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    36. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Thirdsin · · Score: 1
      Do you play WoW? Have you ever?

      Probably more like Blizzard has decided that people paranoid about having their accounts compromised have become such a serious market segment that it can eke out a few more pennies selling these dongles for 6 euros a pop.

      If you played then you would know how big a problem this actually is. I can't even start to count how many real life friends have had their accounts hacked despite more than adaquate passwords. Then throw in friends online who have gone through the same ordeal and the numbers become rather staggering.
      The process of getting your account back is a pain, requiring you fill out a form then fax it in with a copy of your license! (black and white of course). This process takes about a week.

      I won't disagree that Blizz should be more concerned correcting the problem some other way, perhaps by putting the multi millions they are making to good use. But save us your rediculous conspiracy theories. Ex- If they were really trying to make money, wouldn't a "Super premium Account Restoration Service" be a better idea? Ugh.

      --
      No words of wisedom here.
    37. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Tazmaster75 · · Score: 1

      None of that matters if you get a keylogger on your system.

      --
      The glass is neither half full nor half empty. It is dirty and I don't do dishes!
    38. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by slyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      What does it help to have four different levels of passwords if the entire internet falls under "serious business" in the last rule?

    39. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They cost 6 euros, not $6. Little bit of a difference...

    40. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by leenks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Firefox works so well for all those other passwords / certificates, e.g. for SSH and PAM passwords.

      I know the thread was on web security, but having multiple places to stash potentially the same information is just hassle.

    41. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine these devices would be a godsend for those who frequently play WoW in cybercafes and the like, where they don't have personal control over the security of the computer they're using.

    42. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anguirel · · Score: 1
      --
      ~Anguirel (lit. Living Star-Iron)
      QA: The art of telling someone that their baby is ugly without getting punched.
    43. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

      Well, I personally did lose a very developed wow account complete with a 70 in s3 gear... and blizzard refused to do anything about it claiming that it was my fault(which is bullshit). Course, that wasn't a security issue, it was a someone on my router bots issue.

    44. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never have mod points when I need them. Someone mod this guy +20 hilarious.

    45. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Security is a failure if it doesn't take human behavior into effect. The simple fact is that the password system is broken, fundamentally, because *everybody* shares passwords between different services, simply because they don't have the memory for anything else. (And I know, any second now the Slashdot wag who actually does use a different password will chime in.)

      Unless the system works for the random man-on-the-street without requiring months of training, or a nasty failure before they learn, it's a failure.

    46. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      ...Windows allows for programs to be installed on its platform without administrative level consent or knowledge...

      Well, yes...so long as none of the files are installed in places where the user only has read-only permissions (or no permissions). Of course, this only counts on Windows NT systems. I bet you're also surprised that users on Linux systems can install software! So long as they only install to $HOME.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    47. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by cryptoluddite · · Score: 1

      None of that matters if you get a keylogger on your system.

      That's why level 4: Money, Banks is done from a livecd boot (or dual boot that is only used for offline/level 4 stuff).

      Dividing the passwords into secure levels is nice because when you change passwords you can just shift them down a level... so there are fewer new passwords to remember -- your old highly secure 15 character password with numbers and punctuation becomes your web forum password (that you have firefox remember for you anyway).

    48. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      Entrust here likes to advertise they're 1/7th as expensive as the ones RSA sells

      While I do not doubt that RSA's device is way over priced, one seventh the cost still seems to good to be true. Also, FWIIW, I followed a link on Entrust's page and found token that claims to do what Blizzard claims for its US$6.50 token, but for US$5.00.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    49. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      I've never seen those devices go for less than $18 in quantities of 2-3000. Blizzard's getting a deal on this. Their support costs for hacked accounts is just ludicrous in terms of time their support people spend fixing things. This should make it a *lot* cheaper for Blizzard, and a lot less scary for me.

      one big problem Blizzard should address is that their online forums use the same username/password as the game, so phishers can pick stuff up *even easier* since web browsers in general seem to be so full of security holes you could drain pasta with them.

    50. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Samah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I keep this database and its master key close to my heart for emergencies.
      http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/

      It can autogenerate relatively strong passwords for you, and has an "autotype" feature where you can just press Ctrl+T on any login screen and it'll automatically log you in (assuming it follows the usual format of: username <tab> password <enter>).

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    51. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you get your password reset? This has just happened to me - deactivated a year ago, now account password / secret question have been changed, so I assume it's been compromised).

      What kind of things did Blizzard require from you to reset the acct password? I havn't called them yet because I assume they'll tell me tough luck or something :/

    52. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      When I was hacked last year they restored everything except my key to Scholo (returned subsequently) and my Praerie Chicken (whatever). If you have a bank alt under level 10 you will need to specifically ask to have it restored, they do not restore items/cash to character below level 10 by default.

      I was running character viewer at hte time so was able to upload my profile to a website to get an accurate picture of what I had at the time of the account hack down to the last copper. Because the profile is stored locally - it was not updated when the account was logged in by another person, and I was told by my husband that I was online (when I most obviously wasn't) so was able to copy the saved variable file before I overwrote the local copy when I regained control of the account.

      I called the local number bliz have for Australia (it's hard to find on their website - but keep looking, it exists), spoke to a rep and got the password changed and the miscreant booted in real time.

      Bizarely the had obviously never stolen a boomkin before because while they stripped me of everything else, they still had my raiding DPS gear and were in the middle of a Shattered Halls run when we regained control. Our best guess - they wanted to try it out.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    53. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      Norway? No, in Norway it would be made from freshly "acquired" whale bones.

    54. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1

      You can't change the secret question or answer, as far as I know. They may ask for you to fax information such as ID or something more (SSID, Birth Certificate, I dunno)

    55. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1
      A "case" like this would never make it close to a courtroom.

      From Article 8 of the World of Warcraft Terms of Use:

      You agree that you have no right or title in or to any such content, including the virtual goods or currency appearing or originating in the Game, or any other attributes associated with the Account or stored on the Service.

    56. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Alibaba10100 · · Score: 1
    57. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1
      According to Article 6 of the World of Warcraft Terms of Use:

      You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your Login Information, and you will be responsible for all uses of your Login Information, whether or not authorized by you.


      So, technically, any time anyone loses control of their account, it's their fault. It seems the restorations that are done are not done out of obligation, but for the sake of good service.

    58. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      Generally I believe these work more like a keygen.

      You hit the button, it gives you a computed value.

      Simple, just a couple lines of code on an imbeded device.

      --Toll_Free

    59. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, with $1.2 billion in profits in 2007, I'm pretty sure the brass at Blizzard could afford to piss out the components to build a time-synchronized security token in-house. And even if they were reselling the Entrust devices, you can bet that with a potential customer base of up to what is it, 10 million active subscribers.. that Entrust would be willing to come down on that price a bit. All Blizzard needs to do with the price of the device is break even, if even that. They might be willing to part with some money for each one sold based on the benefits they'd be getting.

      For one thing, anyone who buys one of these things is going to have a hell of a time trying to tell Blizzard that they weren't the one who got their own account banned. Lots of people who get banned for cheating will claim they got hacked in order to try to get out of the offense. That's beside the headaches of WoW password stealers (keyloggers, etc), which undoubtedly cost Blizzard a lot of money for customer service in the first place.

      For two, these things cost money for the customer to purchase. That means the customer is less likely to do anything to cheat with their protected account, because then a) any new account they attach to the device is then associated to the cheating account, or b) they're out another $6 over the cost of the game and any paid subscription.

      I'd say it's win-win for Blizzard. Great idea.

    60. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I has considered joining, but if that's how my IP (character) will be treated (blizzard are you reading?) I will not be signing up this game.

    61. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Six euros is a steal. At my workplace the charge to business units for each RSA token is up over $50.

    62. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While not all users are dumb, they are occasionally drunk and at the house of a dumb friend whose computer is compromised. Yeah, I lost several characters and had my main looted to almost nothing thanks to that. /already placed an order for one of the tokens

    63. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Meski · · Score: 1

      I used to be an avid Gnome user

      Ack! washes eyes with HCl

      Gnome users are bad enough, but that you confess to being avid...

    64. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Pants man had to represent himself, though. Any WoWer who goes to a lawyer with the 'important' case of "WAAAH! MY PHAT LOOTZ IZ GONE!" would almost certainly be told to not let the door hit his ass on the way out.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    65. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

      When I had my account compromised I talked to their support staff and the matter was resolved in two days, with a preliminary restoration in like 10 hours.
      They knew what was going on, and they were very helpful.

    66. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by MyIS · · Score: 1

      There is one big thing that these physical password devices solve for Blizzard - people selling off accounts. It is no longer as simple as emailing someone your name/pass string. Now you have to ship the password dongle, too.

      --
      http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
    67. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1
      From Article 16-A:

      To expedite resolution and control the cost of any dispute, controversy or claim related to this Agreement ("Dispute"), you and Blizzard agree to first attempt to negotiate any Dispute (except those Disputes expressly provided below) informally for at least thirty (30) days before initiating any arbitration or court proceeding.


      Wherein, they would refer you to article 8, and ask you to leave.

    68. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

      WoW runs just fine on my Mac

    69. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by rtechie · · Score: 1

      But we're stuck with it because password security is several orders of magnitude easier to implement in software than REAL security features. The other problem is that most alternatives to passwords require specialized hardware that may not be available for your application.

      For example, fingerprint scanners solve most of the problems with passwords. The problem is that most computers and very little specialty hardware (game consoles, PDAs, etc.) have fingerprint scanners.

      Probably the best solution at the moment a USB drive with a password vault. That way you only have to remember one password. Of course, that won't work on your PDA.

    70. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another good tip is to use secure account names aswell, and never, ever, name your character or forum profile after your account name.

    71. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using qwerty for years and haven't yet been ha

    72. Re:Not a problem... an opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's say they only make $1 profit on each one. How many millions of people play WoW?

  2. Only 1 time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    crap.. I hope I don't forget it.

  3. one time passwords are a good idea by Colin+Smith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyway...

     

    --
    Deleted
  4. Bilzzard? by helpfulcorn · · Score: 1

    Bilzzard, huh? Well, they're much better than that company "Blizzard"

    1. Re:Bilzzard? by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe they wanted to spell it "Bill-zard"

      base client: 25 bucks
      bc client: 25 bucks
      name changes: 10 bucks
      realm chances: 25 bucks (per character, that's 250 bucks if you are transferring off a realm on which you were established)
      wrath of the lich king: (unknown, but be prepared to chop up your first born son)

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Bilzzard? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      wrath of the lich king: (unknown, but be prepared to chop up your first born son)

      I'm sure there are a few WoW addicts who wouldn't consider that an unfair deal to be in the WotLK beta...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Bilzzard? by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 1

      wrath of the lich king: (unknown, but be prepared to chop up your first born son)

      I'm sure there are a few WoW addicts who wouldn't consider that an unfair deal to be in the WotLK beta...

      True WoW addicts wont have the time to produce a first born, which is why only n00bs will ever get to be in the beta.

      (I dont play WoW, not even on TV)

      --
      She made the willows dance
    4. Re:Bilzzard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oblig response:
            I'm sure the intersection of the set of WoW addicts mentioned above and the set of WoW addicts with children to chop up is damn near the null set.

    5. Re:Bilzzard? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure there's a lot more WoW players who would give anything for the prerequisites of a first born son.

    6. Re:Bilzzard? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Name changes and realm changes cost precisely because they want to keep it down and not have the kids change every 5 seconds.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    7. Re:Bilzzard? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      Name changes and realm changes cost precisely because they want to keep it down and not have the kids change every 5 seconds.

      Hah! if certain realms didn't suck so bad they wouldn't have that problem would they.

      Try tolerating the retaliation battle group as a competent alliance player.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    8. Re:Bilzzard? by ari+wins · · Score: 1

      Huh, you think Retaliation sucks, over on Cyclone you see more "forming losing premade's" over trade than I'd like to admit. Which, of course, just means the horde gets their welfare epics 3X as fast as alliance, and boy, does it show!

      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
    9. Re:Bilzzard? by Graff · · Score: 1

      Try tolerating the retaliation battle group as a competent alliance player.

      Reckoning isn't that great either. I think the problem has less to do with a particular realm or battlegroup and more to do with some of the people who are on the Alliance. We seem to get a ton more kids and immature adults, maybe because they want to play what they perceive as the "good" side or maybe because they want to play the prettier races.

      Now that school is out for the summer, try PVPing during normal work hours and then PVPing again after the adults come home from work. It's like night and day. You go from losing 90% of the battlegrounds (75% if you only play AV) to losing 60% of them. The only factor is the fact that most of the mature players have jobs during the day and so the people doing battlegrounds are mostly kids on vacation.

      I'm not saying that all kids can't PVP, a lot of them are good in 1v1, but I think that many of them lack what it takes to work as a team and win large-scale battles. They mostly wander off at the first shiny object ("ooo look a horde way over there, lemme leave this node I'm at") and let the rest of the team get owned.

    10. Re:Bilzzard? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "Hah! if certain realms didn't suck so bad they wouldn't have that problem would they."

      Naa, suck is subjective.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    11. Re:Bilzzard? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      which is why only n00bs will ever get to be in the beta.

      I think Blizzard would readily prefer that. You don't get a lot of information out of beta testers who keep doing the same thing over and over.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Bilzzard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      name change: don't name your character stupid shit
      realm change: what, can't make friends on the realm you're on? it's a game, play with what you got. really, it's not that bad unless you're a total douche but then you deserve to be charged for that anyway, so whatever.

      And to the rest, have you seen the price of games recently? that's fucking cheap.

      Fucking cheapskate.

    13. Re:Bilzzard? by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 1

      A WoW-player and a tomatoe are walking down the street. All of a sudden, the tomatoe is run over by an enormous truck. The WoW-player stops, turns and says : Come on dwarf-ketchup, lets go! (drumroll: ba-da-disch)

      --
      She made the willows dance
    14. Re:Bilzzard? by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Hey, I bought BC for $10 at Microcenter!

      And I also made my girlfriend buy the base game for me! How often does THAT happen?

      But I also spent about $150 on subscriptions, so yeah, point taken.

      Also: 25 bucks for a character transfer? I think that's the most expensive copy & paste job in history.

    15. Re:Bilzzard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trnaslation: ZOMG WTF y do peeps need 2 maek moneys? my parents payed every thing 4 me!

    16. Re:Bilzzard? by WoNY · · Score: 1

      Base Client + BC = $40 Battlechest at your local Wal Mart

      Realm changes? Seriously? You're going to move your 9 alts with you if you decide to change servers on your main?

      Pretty ignorant post aside from the funny quip about the cost of WotLK, but it will be in standard MMO expansion fashion 29.99 or 39.99 USD

  5. It's both by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's both. Password stealing via phishing and other means has hit quite a few MMO's. It boils down to dumb users mainly, and Blizzard surely sees a profit opportunity in their stupidity.

    1. Re:It's both by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's actually not exaggerated. The average phishing server yields a quite interesting harvest of various passwords for various online games.

      It would already kill a lot of those "opportunities" for phishers if online game makers required different PWs for account and board. But appearantly selling one time pads is more profitable.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:It's both by me+at+werk · · Score: 3, Informative

      PayPal sells these keyfobs as well, and I bought one. It broke, started showing 42424242 and 88888888, as well as some diagnostic info (like 25% batt, etc). I contacted PayPal and they weren't very helpful (as expected), and it was basically, buy another one. I just disabled the requirement for it on the account.

      I think that the paypal security issue is similar, just phishing. But hey, if my account got fucked while I had a keyfob activated, I'd be at an advantage wouldn't I?

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    3. Re:It's both by Splab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So err, how do you go about getting into your account and disabling the feature if the thing is broken?

    4. Re:It's both by weetabeex · · Score: 0

      would you?

    5. Re:It's both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the FAQ, it states that in the event of losing the OTP dongle, you would have to call billing and support and jump through a few hoops to get the OTP removed.

    6. Re:It's both by PFritz21 · · Score: 1

      Like they say, a fool and his money are soon parted.

    7. Re:It's both by endx7 · · Score: 1

      You call them up, and say "oh hai, my password device is broken". They ask you to provide a few bits of information to make sure you're really you, and then they either send you a new one, or they disable the required use of it.

    8. Re:It's both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but the users concerned about their account security probably aren't the type to fall for phishing scams in the first place. I once ran one for Diablo II, and it was all too easy to throw some convincing material on a page and get idiots to put in their account name and password. It was only once or twice that someone with anything worth stealing fell for it, out of probably a thousand or so accounts (this was a time period of only a few weeks).

    9. Re:It's both by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Friend of mine has one for his stock accounts. It periodically drift out of time sync (a little more than once a year).

      Hate to be out of sync when you really wanted to log in.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:It's both by Splab · · Score: 1

      Well the point of my post was of course subtle, and sure seem to have gone way over the head of the repliers.

      Yes I'm well aware that that could be a solution, however, gp said he didn't want to pay for a new one, so they must have allowed him to disable it and thus making the protection a moot point.

      It only takes the "hackers" a single login to screw you over.

    11. Re:It's both by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      I am not so sure.

      1. People see on the forums how so and so got 'hacked' and lost their stuff.
      2. Same people see ad for new security keyfob
      3. Profit

    12. Re:It's both by Macgrrl · · Score: 3, Informative

      My account got hacked last year after I downloaded a UI mod from a reputable mod site (worldofwar.ui) that had been hacked.

      I had changed my password after I thought I had cleared all remants of the hack from my machine, but unfortaunetly I must have missed something. After I regained control of my accoutn again, I changed the password on a different machine and did a low level format and a complete reinstall on my windows box. I only ever logged in by pasting in my password from a text file from then until I replaced the windows box with a new Mac.

      I wouldn't characterise myself as a dumb user, have been a tech support monkey and server admin. Even being careful you get caught out sometimes.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    13. Re:It's both by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      but the hackers need to phone up and know a whole bunch of extra crap other than your login. presumably a load of billing info and secret question stuff, so a bit more than just your password n username, and harder to trick out of you.

    14. Re:It's both by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 1

      Word to the wise: AddOns only require xml and lua files to work. If your AddOn has you running, really, anything else, I'd be wary.

    15. Re:It's both by lnjasdpppun · · Score: 2, Informative

      The small amount I've read on this says you can resynch it by giving it 3 sequential codes (@ 1 code per minute). Sounds pretty nifty and a reasonable way around the synch problem.

    16. Re:It's both by lnjasdpppun · · Score: 1

      Adverts on some of the popular sites have been known to contain keyloggers, so it doesn't always have to be the UI mod itself thats doing the nasty stuff.

    17. Re:It's both by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Blizzard surely sees a profit opportunity in their stupidity.

      Ummm, $6E ($10-11 US?) is going to make them a big profit ??? They're going to gain about $0.25 profit or less after you consider their costs for the device, the licensing, and the development support of implementing it.

      You have to realize, that Blizzard isn't concerned about making a profit on this device. What they are concerned about is having a stolen account anger a customer enough to make them leave WoW and then they lose $180/yr ($14.99/mo) which is the real source of their profit.

      FWIW, I have the PayPal Security Key which is a similar device which generates a 6-digit extension to your password valid for 30 seconds. $5 and it fits easily on a keychain (although I leave it secured at home because I don't really want to use my paypal account more than I have to). I don't think PayPal makes money on these either... it's about giving your customers an option to protect themselves.

    18. Re:It's both by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      It was embedded in the zip file that contained the .xml and .lua. When I unzipped the download it executed something in the background.

      My anti viral program didn't pick it up when I unzipped it.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    19. Re:It's both by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

      Something similar happened to me, eTrust Antivirus (the corporate version my company installs... not that I'm playing WoW on a company laptop you understand) didn't even blink at the trojan. Now, I'd like a keyfob and I use Antivir and occasional scans from ClamAV.

    20. Re:It's both by rgviza · · Score: 1

      > It boils down to dumb users mainly
      and the fact that most games have no lockout period for x number of failed attempts, or strong password policy requirements. They are ripe for brute forcing/dictionary attacks...

      Part of the blame goes to dumb game companies for not following a "security-by-design" philosophy ; )

      It's easy to blame users, and really hard to look in the mirror and point the finger at the guy who's looking back at you.

      "Blame the user" is way too prevalent in the gaming industry because they don't like to admit that they didn't (or possibly don't know how to) do a good job with security.

      I've _NEVER_ seen a lockout timer on a game for failing to enter the password correctly 3 times.

      NCSoft has a lockout on their site and web based user interface, but you are free to try to log in as many times as you like directly in the game.

      This is a huge problem that needs to be addressed before anyone starts blaming users.

      -Viz

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    21. Re:It's both by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      He must request a new one which arrives after a few days.

      He can call in but if the market is melting up or down, there are not enough phone lines at a discount broker (they count on you using the computer).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    22. Re:It's both by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      Maybe with WoW. With Paypal you just do the same 'forgot password' security questions. It even prompts you automatically for them if you fuck up.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
  6. can't beat stupidity by rewben · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its not the system that has a flaw, its the stupidity of people for giving away their usernames/passwords for powerlvling etc.

    --
    Old programmers never die.. they just can't C as well.
    1. Re:can't beat stupidity by plasmacutter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The incidents of hacking on my realm indicate the hacking is happening to their servers, and they, being blizzard, refuse to admit they're at fault.

      (The same way every couple months their patches or maintenance cause massive lag spikes and random disconnects, and they blame the routers because blizzard is apparently too special to conform to tcp-ip standards)

      Maybe when enough people with this authenticator get screwed, they'll actually be forced to admit and fix it.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:can't beat stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There have been several trojans designed to snag WoW usernames and passwords since WoW began, feel free to Google. Of course in many cases a dose of stupidity or more like just ignorance is required, such as running your browser so it can "properly" render websites such as WoW's homepage or even Slashdot now that it's had the abrasive AJAX added. Not everyone is a user of Firefox with noscript and with the requirements on so many "necessary" websites to allow Javascript and Flash even those that do find at least temporarily enabling some websites necessary, but no website can be guaranteed safe to do this on. Of course the odds would make you a bit safer if you dipped your Wow in WINE before consuming and kept your browsing restricted to *nix.

    3. Re:can't beat stupidity by Saicho · · Score: 1

      do you think you will ever reach your blue island of perfect connectivity ?

      --
      its more like its ever been than it is now
    4. Re:can't beat stupidity by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 1

      When I played, quite a few of my guildies got hacked, and none of them were powerlevelers or engaged in any sort of prohibited activity like gold buying. It took them a couple of weeks to get their stuff back, and was a real nuisance to them and to the guild.

      Interestingly, not one Mac using member of the guild ever got hacked, so I guess malware was responsible.

      I don't know how it is now, but before BC the powerlevelers used to be easy to spot. Just look for the Night Elf Hunter in the PvP reward armour who has the Core Marksman Rifle (the only craftable epic gun) and no skill at all (feel free to insert witty comment on how difficult it was to separate them from the rest of the hunter population here â" BTW I played a dwarf hunter).

      Blizzard seems to be snowed under with cheats. I once spent a week farming leather in Winterspring for Faire rewards, and the same bots were there all the time. Reporting them did no good, since they just logged another bot. It's one of the reasons I left the game.

      Fraudulent auctions, con-artists, abusive panhandlers, people with hardly a grasp of English clogging up the trade channel, lunatics ranting over the general chat, and the rest of it. Azeroth is probably the most crime ridden country on earth. Come to think of it, it doesn't sound that different from a major American city.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    5. Re:can't beat stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know.. It's quite normal not conforming to tcp-ip standard for wow.. Considering it doesnt use it to begin with. They use UDP and for a reason.. Im quite certain you wouldnt want to double or tripple your latency either.

      The reason maintence and patches makes the servers get lag spikes and being unstable is also quite normal. All mmo games have that and it's because normally you make gameservers cache alot of the data but after maintence that cache is cleared making the lookup data more than normal which is the cause for server instability. There's no real way around it for massive servers except to reduce general load to begin with. But that would mean you're running low population servers which in the end, isnt as fun for the playerbase.

    6. Re:can't beat stupidity by Toridas · · Score: 1

      The incidents of hacking on my realm indicate the hacking is happening to their servers, and they, being blizzard, refuse to admit they're at fault.

      Blizzard isn't at fault. They aren't responsible for people going out and downloading trojans which steal their passwords. Oops, I'm sorry, I think the word everyone uses for that nowadays is "getting hacked."

    7. Re:can't beat stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Blizzard seems to be snowed under with cheats.

      haw haw! u made a funny!!

    8. Re:can't beat stupidity by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wrong. The WOW servers have never once been compromised. It's not WOW that's being compromised, it's the *player's computers* that are getting trojan'd/keylogged. And the "lag spikes" and "random disconnects" are usually happening to people with wireless-N, which is *not a standard*...it's basically beta and has a ton of problems. And blaming Blizzard for WOW "causing" people's routers to reset? I don't care what kind of data you're sending out, if it causes your modem or router to reset, then the problem is in the device, not the game.

    9. Re:can't beat stupidity by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 1

      That was unintentional, and is deeply embarrassing. :-(

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    10. Re:can't beat stupidity by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      MY computer is wired and experiences those lag spikes and random disconnects.

      I guess wired routers are not standard eitehr?

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    11. Re:can't beat stupidity by ergean · · Score: 1

      Same here... wired all the way with a FTTH connection. There are times when I get lagged with any character in Ashenvale... and no other place. But most of the time I get lagged to hell around 20 GMT. (eu servers)

      All other pings to google.com and others are normal... nothing unusual.

      So please don't blame the router... or the computers.

      I get the same experience from other computers. And get the same story from friends that play on eu servers.

      And I get random disconnects now and then, some times even without any lag warning.

    12. Re:can't beat stupidity by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Being disconnected from a game is a very different thing from having a router/modem reset so your entire system loses its Internet connection.

    13. Re:can't beat stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Um, let's see. More likely: uneducated users using weak passwords that are easily guessed, the same password on shady or weakly secured forums, buying gold (signing up on the gold buying site to bid and GIVING THEM THEIR CREDIT CARD INFO all probably with the same password and login, buying power leveling (GIVING THEM THEIR PASSWORD AND ACCOUNT INFO), download cracks and cheat programs because they suck at the game which happen to have trojan horses, don't patch their machines, don't run virus or anti-spyware software, and finally share their password and account info to friends who also practice all of the above.

      OR

      a systemic break in to blizzard's servers that affects some but not all of their customers? If blizzard's servers were really hacked, and blizzard knows about it (as you directly imply), why wouldn't the hackers just break in to EVERYONE's account?

      Damn, you're right, clearly it's blizzard hiding the fact that their security is totally non-existant!

    14. Re:can't beat stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lags are periodic times used to correlate with daily honor calculations. Since those are gone now (or is that in Wrath? where everyone gets the honor instantly?) I'm not sure what would cause that other than some other periodic maintenance feature.

    15. Re:can't beat stupidity by caladine · · Score: 1

      How was this modded insightful?
      Can we all start making unfounded claims and get modded up?
      Let's be serious. If you're going to make claims like this, even a modicum of evidence would be nice.

      It's always easier to blame someone else. The real problem is that security is the last thing on most people's minds.

    16. Re:can't beat stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the hacking was on the server end then many, many more accounts would be hacked than are at the moment. I would have thought that with 6 accounts over 3 years old, one of mine would have been hacked by now. Accounts are compromised in 4 main ways;

      1. Keyloggers. They're all over the forums and Youtube.

      2. People paying for power leveling

      3. Phishes - especially fake account action notices and WOTLK invites.

      4. People using the same user / pass combo on less secure sites.

      As for the other issue, the numbers would suggest that those affected are a very, very small minority. With a user base of 2.5 million in the U.S., even if 1% are having a problem, it will look like a lot on the Tech Support forum. After patches, the far more common issue are those folks who can't configure their firewalls after wow.exe or launcher.exe is changed.

      Daisyjane, the WoW Tech Support Cow.

    17. Re:can't beat stupidity by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      it does cause everything else to drop actually. only happens when blizzard's precious and ever so innocent game is active. There are other things which stress my connection much more thoroughly and don't do that.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    18. Re:can't beat stupidity by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      I assume that with such certainty at you're expressing, you have proof to share with us?

      Above, there are example anecdotes of people whose accounts have been dormant for months, only to find that the accounts had been hacked sometime in the interrim. A keylogger would have had no relevant input; a trojan would not have had any locally stored password to scrape.

      I really am interested in what studies you've made (or read) pointing to wireless-N as the culprit.

      I'm also interested in how you can possibly be so assured that Blizzard servers have never been compromised. You're on slashdot, so I assume you've got an independent source to verify Blizzard....

    19. Re:can't beat stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. The WOW servers have never once been compromised. It's not WOW that's being compromised, it's the *player's computers* that are getting trojan'd/keylogged.

      And the "lag spikes" and "random disconnects" are usually happening to people with wireless-N, which is *not a standard*...it's basically beta and has a ton of problems.

      And blaming Blizzard for WOW "causing" people's routers to reset? I don't care what kind of data you're sending out, if it causes your modem or router to reset, then the problem is in the device, not the game.

      Alright, then tell us why EVERYONE gets horrible lag on a patch day or a major maintenance fix, where they have to have the servers down longer. I know everyone doesn't use wireless-N. I get lag on patch days sometimes and I'm not even on wireless. Since it only happens on these days and no other time, that's the conclusion that many will come up with. I've never been disconnected, though...

    20. Re:can't beat stupidity by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      I agree with you mostly. Yes, most account hacks occur because someone had a weak password, downloaded a trojan, shared their account or some other security breach that would end in termination in the corporate world.

      However, I also blame WoW's very weak password authentication system. It only supports up to 15 character, alpha-numeric, limited number of symbols and is not case-sensitive. I have mine as difficult as possible and I change it monthly.

      Still, I'll be buying one of these fobs because every layer of security helps.

  7. Security Theatre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This just seems like another money grab by another corporation. In the four years I've had my WoW account I have not had a single problem with a breach in security. I am definitely not security unconscious though, although I do find it hard to imagine that people have problems at all. Users just prove time and again that most people are stupid or ignorant or a mix of the two. Of course corporations want to cash in on that, and who can blame them. "Lets sell them something that they don't really need, but we'll tell them that they really do need it!" Like shooting fish in the barrel.

    1. Re:Security Theatre by Tirhakah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not security unconscious either, but my account was compromised. When you have no control over what other uses the computer you play on is put, that's when you run into problems

    2. Re:Security Theatre by pipatron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not security unconscious either [...] no control over what other uses the computer you play on is put

      One might argue that a security-conscious person would not let any random people share his computer, unless it had a very safe multi-user system.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    3. Re:Security Theatre by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 1

      "One might argue that a security-conscious person would not let any random people share his computer, unless it had a very safe multi-user system."

      One might be arguing with one's wife, with whom one shares the said computer, and one's wife might well argue that, unless she was allowed to do what she damn wanted on it, marital relations would be suspended. Life can be complicated.

      (Although, admittedly the percentage of men in WoW who have a wife, girlfriend or indeed any friends in meatspace is probably close to zero, and even then those who did would probably endure the sex strike rather than lose their epix).

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    4. Re:Security Theatre by tepples · · Score: 1

      One might argue that a security-conscious person would not let any random people share his computer, unless it had a very safe multi-user system.

      I agree, but how should a security-conscious high school student ensure that his parents' PC has a very safe multi-user system?

    5. Re:Security Theatre by pipatron · · Score: 1

      You take a cheap memorystick or USB disk and make it boot your own copy of windows/linux/whatever. Requires some reading and learning, but could be well worth it.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  8. There are those who could learn from this... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wowzers, now I can have more security for my account on some computer game than my online banking (I'm looking at you, Citibank).

    --
    "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
    "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
    1. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm... let's see... The average WoW addict is playing 30 hours a day, has most likely no job...

      What do you think is worth more, the account of such a person or his bank account?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Funny

      They both probably are about equally low in worth.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    3. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't check eBay lately. Mostly because I prefer playing a game instead of paying someone to do it for me. But I'd be surprised if there aren't some high level chars for sale.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Hmm... let's see... The average WoW addict is playing 30 hours a day, has most likely no job...

      What do you think is worth more, the account of such a person or his bank account?

      What? Almost everyone I know who plays hardcore (30hrs/wk and +) have a job. Some have a family life. It's not different than watching TV for the same amount of time. I've known one guy who didn't work and played really hardcore, and he was "financially independent".

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    5. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by hameluck · · Score: 1

      I bank with Citibank and I have a OTP dongle I use for all online transactions.

      The problem isn't Citibank, the problem is the country you live in. I bank with Citibank, Singapore, not Citibank USA (I'm assuming Citibank USA... forgive me if I'm wrong).

      I've lived and worked in several countries around the world and Canada and the USA are pretty much the worst when it comes to customer service in the retail banking sector.

    6. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by zennyboy · · Score: 1

      30 hours per day?

    7. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by mordenkhai · · Score: 1

      Obviously the WoW player is worth more. He or she has after all discovered a method to introduce at least 6 extra hours into a day. Perhaps using this technology he or she also adds an additional 12 hours for work, school and lotto time! You just assume he or she has no job because you are a lazy "24 Hour" human, incapable of the real commitment a 42 hour day commands!

    8. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by Kumiorava · · Score: 1

      That's counted as game time with multiple accounts. Average WoW addict is capable of playing with at least two simultaneous clients.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt8ocQNj7l0&feature=related

    9. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by HycoWhit · · Score: 1

      You are on the money about Blizzard now offering better security than the majority of online bank/investment firm.

      Two of the eight financial institutions I frequent provide an RSA key. Blizzard, with 10million accounts, has determined the amount of money/time involved with account theft/recovery makes it worth implementing better security. Why banks haven't seen the value escapes me. But, something tells me Blizzard's implementation will be a kick in the pants--and before the end of the year I'll see six of my eight financial institutions offering an RSA type device.

    10. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Redundant
      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's due to time dilation setting in in the vicinity of the average WoW deadhead. Einstein WAS right, ya know, in the vicinity of great mass time goes slowly.

      Proof: Sit down with any WoW addict and watch him raid. You'll notice how seconds turn into hours. This is also in accordance with the phenomen, since it depends on the observer's frame of reference. For the WoW player, time passes normally or even at an increased rate.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 1

      Citibank Australia (you're forgiven, but only this once ;P).

      2 or 3 banks here offer an OTP dongle or similar device - HSBC for everyone, and I think 2 of the big 4 for "high value" clients. Citibank know they don't need it to be competitive (they have some other very nice features offered by none of their competitors, like a total lack of account keeping and ATM withdrawal fees, from any ATM, not just their own).

      To reply to another poster below - I don't think Blizzard doing this will kick them in the pants at all. They are not competing with WoW (yet..?). If their competitors all did it overnight, then it would be a different story.

      --
      "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
      "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
    13. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Almost everyone I know who plays hardcore (30hrs/wk and +) have a job. Some have a family life.

      That's my experience as well. I play with a number of husband/wife teams.

      It's not different than watching TV for the same amount of time.

      Oh, but it is different. I'd much rather have my kids playing WoW than spending the same amount of time in front of a television set.

    14. Re:There are those who could learn from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admit then, that the WoW account probably has more value then. The average WoW account holder is an easier target and takes less precautions.

      Consider that the "value" of the account information is most likely unknown in both cases.

      Game stuff can be sold and gold can be transferred to another account. That in turn can be sold for real money with little or no ramifications.

      Breaking into a bank account and taking money has legal ramifications and is pursued far more throughly.

      So maybe you can get $20-$40 dollars for selling some stolen WoW gold? There is little to no risk and hiding your tracks are a lot easier then breaking into a bank account seeing that the balance is $20-$40 and trying to transfer the funds out.

  9. The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Null+Nihils · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why can I get this feature for a MMORPG account, but not from my bank, or any other banks I know of?

    I value my real money far more than imaginary swords, shields and armor that exist as bits in an entertainment company's database.

    Maybe some people's priorities are different...

    1. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I am sure your bank would love to charge you for that feature, and I am sure it would be at a MUCH higher price for what Blizzard is offering. Perhaps it is not cost effective for them to do it yet. Praise be to ROI.

    2. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Nuskrad · · Score: 4, Informative

      A lot of banks in the UK now require card reading devices for use with online banking. It's been rolled out across the last couple of years, not sure what the situation is elsewhere in the world though

    3. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by ivansanchez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I value my real money far more than imaginary swords, shields and armor that exist as bits in an entertainment company's database.

      You mean that you value dollars that exist as bits in company A's DB, more than gold coins that exist as bits in company B's DB, don't you?

    4. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A fully levelled character in WoW can easily fetch $4000 or more. Whether you like it or not..

    5. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know Bendigo Bank in Australia does for around $40. I think the National Bank in Australia does too

    6. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by maxume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The trick is that companies C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z also all value the dollars that exists as bits in company A's DB.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Mascot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sounds like an issue where you live. I don't know a single bank that allows online access without token authentication.

      I would seriously question the judgement of a bank that would.

    8. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by mattb112885 · · Score: 1

      If every person in the world needed a unique key every time they logged in, they would need at least 14 digits. It brings back some bad memories from Legacy of the Wizard.

    9. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      really ? which banks do you know ? as i have accounts with three of the largest banks in the UK (lloyds, Natwest, Barclays) and none of them offer (or have offered) SecureID hence i dont do my banking online

    10. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Steemers · · Score: 1

      My bank (ING bank, I know it is Dutch but I don't know if it operates international) has used a (as far as I can tell from the Blizzard press release) similar but more advanced device from almost the beginning of its online banking service. I don't know why other banks don't since it is such a simple yet very useful thing.

    11. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Kidbro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm using a similar device, seeded (I assume) by my combined Credit/ATM card (issued by my bank) for online banking. I got the device this year "free of charge". Before this, I used scratch cards with one time codes, and I believe that mine was the last major bank in the country to switch from that system.

      I live in Sweden.

    12. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Nathonix · · Score: 1

      nearly all american banks, sadly, do not require any sort of hardware authentication for online banking.

      --
      Soap box, Ballot box, Jury box, Ammo box. Use in that order.
    13. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by 26199 · · Score: 1

      In Switzerland it seems to be standard. To access my UBS account online I need: my online account card, a card reader, my "agreement number" (which is unrelated to any of my account numbers) and a six digit PIN.

    14. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Splab · · Score: 1

      Some banks around here (Denmark) supports it - you do however have to specifically ask for the feature. Even the national digital signature is going to get upgraded to one time passes.

      Try asking around, they might have the feature, but for a fee.

    15. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you think about it, society in general value those bits in your banks database more than your own life

    16. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      really ? which banks do you know ?


      I agree, I've got accounts with Halifax and Lloyds and neither have given me a token. I've never even seen any banks mention anything about one-time passwords for added security (which I'd have thought they'd trumpet as "look, come to us, you're less likely to have your details stolen").

      Who are these mysterious "lot" of British banks?

    17. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Allicorn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Barclays have been providing a device they call PIN Sentry since early 2007:

      http://www.barclays.co.uk/pinsentry/

      NatWest introduced their offering summer 2007:

      http://www.natwest.com/microsites/general/card-reader-user-guide/index.asp?cmp=reader

      I believe you're right about Lloyds not having followed suit just yet.

      --
      OMG!!! Ponies!!!
    18. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Nuskrad · · Score: 1

      Natwest do, because that's who I bank with. So do Lloyds and Barclays. The rollout of these devices is still in progress, they're trying to do it gradually from what I see - but they'll probably give you one if you ask for it.

    19. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Why can I get this feature for a MMORPG account, but not from my bank, or any other banks I know of?

      Many banks don't offer them because it costs money to implement a system which uses them and they're really only cost-effective for customers who keep a lot of money in their accounts, so their attitude towards those customers is "if you want it, go to another bank who can offer it". Likewise, of the banks that do offer them only do so for their larger customers. For example, another poster mentioned Citibank not offering security tokens, but they do, but only to their "Citibusiness" custumers whose accounts surely have relatively high minimum balances and/or fees.

      One of the easier banks to get a security token from is ETrade. For investment accounts you can get one for a one-time charge of $25 or for free if you have >$50,000 in assets with them or do more than 10 stocks/options trades per month. If you want one for your checking account, they have checking now too and the same rules apply, but you have to keep a minimum average balance of $5,000 to avoid fees (or have $50K in assets with them). So if you can afford to keep $5K in your checking account or you have $50K to invest with them (maybe your IRA or 401k) then getting one is no problem -- not for everybody obviously, but pretty workable if you care a lot about keeping your online banking secure.

    20. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank (in Australia) provides its clients with a credit card sized digital one time pad.

      Pain it the arse if you get it out of sync, but the service is there none the less.

    21. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank (Itau) here in Brazil just gave me an OTP keychain for online transactions.

    22. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HSBC does it too. Since it's mandatory, the keyfob is of course free.

    23. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 1

      What's worse is that for most people with such characters, that $4000 comprises the lion's share of the economic value they have ever created.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    24. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about company B, Ã, Ã and Ã...?

    25. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by mounthood · · Score: 1

      Banks in the US are required to use two-factor authentication: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/us_regulators_r.html

      This won't help. It'll change the tactics of the criminals, but won't make them go away. ...the short version is that two-factor authentication won't mitigate identity theft, because it's not an authentication problem -- it's a problem with fraudulent transactions

      The funnier rendition of this sad tale is here: http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/WishItWas-TwoFactor-.aspx

      These days, when logging on to various websites, users are asked for a name, password, and the answer to one or more "secret questions." It's actually a new-fangled type of authentication called Wish-It-Was Two-Factor.

      --
      tomorrow who's gonna fuss
    26. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by milkmage · · Score: 1

      i work for a bank - a BIG bank. secondary auth is required by the OCC. all banks need to have something in place by the end of this year for "high risk" transactions. they don't necessarily have to issue FOBS - out of wallet questions, and email/SMS OTP's are also acceptable (to the Fed).

    27. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      A hacker compromising my bank accounts will net an order of magnitude more than this, and yet they're all protected with regular passwords and these moronic "security questions".

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    28. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      Nah, a WoW player can easily inject $4000 worth of pizzas and Coke into the economy.

    29. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      US$4000 for a WoW account? References please. I'm trying to imagine the target market and coming up empty. I know people buy accounts[1], I had the misfortune of teaming up with one a week or so ago, I didn't imagine that people would pay that much.

      And yes, that's vast wealth in the 3rd world.

      [1] In-game, they're called ebays.

    30. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Inda · · Score: 1

      I thank NatWest for doing this. I only wish their small calculator sized reader could actually be used as a calculator. How hard would it have been?

      I'm there, doing my online banking, working through a few figures and I need a calculator. I've lost count of the amount of times I couldn't find the plus button on their reader.

      PS I know I'm going to open myself up to trolls here, I know there is a calculator on my PC, I'm not stupid, don't waste your time.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    31. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using 2-factor authentication with ETrade for about 7 years now.

    32. Re:The first thing that comes to my mind is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do agree more bank security would be nice and yes, I prefer the $Green$ to the Pixels. The banks should follow suit.

      I offer this view though...it is same priority just aimed at different objects.

      What is money?

      it is just paper. People are just amazed that virtual items hold such value and sell for "real" money online. Like it is some new technology or something...take away all the digital crap, these items represent something / have value. ...isn't that just what our money is? time/effort = value money or virtual property

      their bits in a database == your paper in a bank

      -curu

  10. Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by Leperous · · Score: 1

    At the moment, passwords being typed in are obviously being intercepted by a number of means (surely not just keyloggers). How long before someone works out how to intercept the one-time password from the keychain? Surely it's transmitted in much the same way as the current password, only its source is a USB device.

    1. Re:Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by Vapula · · Score: 1

      No, it'll be an OTP token, once the password has been used, it can't be anymore...

      and there will be no physical connexion with the computer,only a small LCD display which will show a 6-digit number...

    2. Re:Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Most accounts that get "hacked" today are a by-product of password sniffers that are targeting webpages (to get bank account information, CC numbers and so on). Since Blizzard, like most online game makers, use the user account information for both, the game and their boards, anyone who logs into the game's board gives away his credentials.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't know what mechanism Blizzard are planning to use for WoW but generally the authentication works by generating a random "seed" number which will only accept a single valid number as a response - the ones I see commonly at work (using a proprietary mechanism) give a 7-digit seed that require a 7-digit response.

      Essentially the keychain allows you to generate the response (as a one-time password) based on being given a specific seed number.

      Incidentally, the problem I have with this system isn't so much the mechanics of it but the fact that if everyone starts using them, it becomes unmanageable for the poor user.

      I'm already seeing this over here in the UK where I have online banking with two banks here. Both have now sent me a small calculator-like device that I put my card into, enter my pin number and the seed number in order to get a response number to allow me to authenticate in order to do online transfers.

      Although I can view my accounts without needing the "calculator", if I want the facility to transfer money no matter where I go, then I have to take these things with me. (Although, in reality, I've not yet tried to see if I can use both cards in one of them on the basis that although they look slightly different physically, they may have the same circuitry inside.)

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Surely all the would-be hacker has to do is buy one of these devices for himself... then it's no more secure than a password.

    5. Re:Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by maxume · · Score: 3, Informative

      The devices each have a unique key. If I have #1, you can't use #2 to get into my account.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by Zironic · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're meant to be account specific and brick themselves if you type in the wrong pin 3 times.

    7. Re:Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by B-a-Z.nl · · Score: 1

      The ABN-AMRO bank in the Netherlands does this differently, the devices are all identical, the seed is stored on your standard ATM card which will only work with your normal PIN (and the card blocks itself after 3 wrong tries). This way you can swap devices with friends etc. If someone obtains your card + PIN you are in trouble anyway. They also give them away for free (plus an extra one for backup if you ask nicely). Pretty nice actually.

    8. Re:Will surely only delay the h4x0rz? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I've got one of these things to access the corporate network via VPN. Each of the devices is different. There's a special procedure you have to go through to key it to a specific PIN. If you can't type the PIN in correctly, you don't get a password and the same password doesn't work twice.

      Nice devices and I'll probably get one for WoW when they're available.

  11. Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    6 euro protecting 1000s of hours of time spent, it's a no brainer.

    1. Re:Cheap by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly,
      A While ago I read an article that a compromised WoW account is worth more on the market then a stolen cc number. Thus WoW accounts make a excellent target for trojans and keyloggers.
      Even if you're a casual player you most likely have invested 100's of hours in your character/account.
      The treat of losing this because you have a stupid 8 year old nephew or you just weren't' paying attention with a download is very real. So 6 bucks for some extra protection is well spent money imo

      --
      Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
    2. Re:Cheap by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

      1000s of hours of time spent

      Some might claim to have "invested" their time in WoW. Your use of the term "spent" seems more accurate. Wikitionary: Adjective spent 1. Consumed, used up, exhausted, depleted. ~

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    3. Re:Cheap by rob1980 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not giving your password to your guildmates and not downloading keyloggers is also a no brainer too. I lost count how many "OMG I GOT HACKED" stories resulted from somebody clicking on sshot001.jpg.pif on the WOW forum or from somebody giving their account info to a guildmember they barely knew.

    4. Re:Cheap by gparent · · Score: 1

      Most hardcore WoW players will actually spend a lot less money playing WoW than you will going out with friends every week. WoW is about $15/month. That's your average movie ticket, at least where I live. So you can either go out to the movies and get about 2 hours of entertainment, or play WoW and get say an hour of entertainment every day/other day/week/two weeks, and you're still paying less than the person who chose to go to the movies. I'd say it's quite the investment, and I don't play WoW myself.

    5. Re:Cheap by gparent · · Score: 1

      Though I guess my argument is kinda nil if you strictly meant time-wise.

    6. Re:Cheap by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      How dare people spend time having fun!

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  12. Other Authentication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was listening to The Instance, which is a WoW podcast and one of their topics concerned Taiwanese WoW players. They had the option to sign up for a different type of secondary authentication which required them to register 3 different phone numbers. You couldn't completely log in unless Blizzard received a call from one of said phone numbers.

    Considering the amount of time people have devoted into these accounts, I don't see this being that big of a deal. As a player, I'm not too sure I'd get one, as I try to avoid random websites, certain browsers and suspiscious addons. The current belief now, however, is that people cracking into wow accounts are using more brute force methods instead of trojan/spyware etc etc (but it's not like those have completely disappeared.)

    There's nothing wrong with a little extra security, especially when you've played for 3 years.

  13. Man, I'm glad I never got into WoW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was addicted to Warcraft I and II back in the day, but the magic faded with III and I never even bothered with WoW. Looks like that was a good thing: Either I'd be horribly disappointed with the money-grubbing focus of every aspect of WoW, or I'd be willingly and blindly be burning a whole lot more cash on an old addiction.

  14. Also by Konster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can imagine that the problem of hacked accounts is *huge* and primarily a problem on the user's end. I'd wager a guess that Blizzard's largest demographic sometimes also engages in P2P/Warez in conjunction with poor security habits. Trojan-laden warez, account sharing, piss-poor passwords and wide-open PC's; users leave themselves wide open to getting their virtual goodies ransacked and run off with.

    I played WoW for 4 months a few years ago and was surprised at the number of trojans packed in the executable installers of some popular UI mods.It wasn't a very clever(but it was effective)way of farming usernames and passwords. Considering the global reach and sheer numbers of people playing WoW, and the virtual goods for real life cash trade, I wouldn't be surprised to learn about WoW-specific trojans running around in the wild. Some people make it easy for the bad guys; using the same login details on WoW related forums as their actual wow account, to purchasing gold and other items from shady websites (good way of farming cc numbers, shady websites also use cc info to pay for their own account time, leading to charge backs and other hassles)to just flat out sharing their details willy-nilly with anyone half trusting.

    And there's no evil in Blizzard charging two cups of coffee for an extra layer of protection. I'm sure they've spent oodles and oodles of cash in the past dealing with these issues, so there's nothing wrong with recouping past costs and helping to avoid a portion of future expenditures.

    I would appreciate separate user names and passwords for account management and character login, too.

    1. Re:Also by jamesh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And there's no evil in Blizzard charging two cups of coffee for an extra layer of protection. I'm sure they've spent oodles and oodles of cash in the past dealing with these issues, so there's nothing wrong with recouping past costs and helping to avoid a portion of future expenditures.


      I don't even think they are trying to recoup costs, it's just a token amount so that every single user doesn't click the 'give me a free token' button. People love getting free stuff, even if they don't need it (or is it just my wife that does that? Hi wife, if you are reading this :)

    2. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's no evil in Blizzard charging two cups of coffee for an extra layer of protection.


      Where the fuck do you buy your coffee?

    3. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I mean, it can't be Starbucks, 'cause two cups of coffee is a hell of a lot more than 6 / $6.50 there!

      P.S. /. won't let me post the Euro symbol.

    4. Re:Also by Graff · · Score: 1

      I played WoW for 4 months a few years ago and was surprised at the number of trojans packed in the executable installers of some popular UI mods.

      That has to be the height of laziness, it takes almost no effort to unpack and move a mod into place.

      The only executable that I use is the Ace Updater which is a package manager that will note updated mods and install them for you. The ONLY reason I use that is because it is open source and I've downloaded the source, inspected it, and built it myself. Based on my inspection there's next to no chance that it contains a trojan.

      I agree that you should have the ability to use a different username and password for account management and game login. That would make it tougher for someone to grab one from the other.

    5. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People love getting free stuff, even if they don't need it (or is it just my wife that does that? Hi wife, if you are reading this :)

      are you sure you're married?

    6. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she is asleep right now.

      -your best friend

  15. Obviously these keys are VERY powerful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I demand that they be nerfed immediately.

    1. Re:Obviously these keys are VERY powerful. by Nathonix · · Score: 1

      never gonna happen, its druidic. now if a rogue keyfob were to become an issue, you can damn well bet it'd get nerfed faster than you can say dual-wield

      --
      Soap box, Ballot box, Jury box, Ammo box. Use in that order.
  16. Long Term evolution... by Vapula · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Phase 1 : OTP is a plus that you may buy
    Phase 2 : A free OTPtoken with each WoLK extension sold
    Phase 3 : A collector edition with WoW+BC+WoLK+token
    Phase 4 : Mandatory token for all accounts

    That way, they cut the grass under the feet of the chinese farmers who sell ready to play accounts and to the reselling of accounts on E-Bay and such...

    1. Re:Long Term evolution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quite the opposite, I'd think... an account is tied to a physical token this way. You actually make it easier to sell accounts. All that is being increased are postage costs. The whole process is safer for buyer and seller too...

    2. Re:Long Term evolution... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Phase 4a: Account is tied permanently to region(IP) and cannot be logged in from any other region. Proxy checking is implemented to ensure compliance.

      Further, tokens are distributed in such a way that auction sites will not accept.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    3. Re:Long Term evolution... by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      The problem is not people selling their own accounts.

      The problem is other people selling your account which has become a problem due to trojans in mods, forums, etc.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  17. Entropia Universe already does this for long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Entropia Universe already provides a "smart card" + reader for OTP authentication.

    It used to be you needed to pay about 15 USD for it, but as of about 4 months ago, they giving it free to anyone who has spent about 500 USD minimum in the game.

    Everyone else can still pay the small amount to get the device.

  18. NL here... cards / codes / cellphone by Animaether · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll state up front that I absolutely -hate- the "something you have" part of security when that 'something you have' ends up being a fat card reader that won't fit anywhere convenient, not even in your notebook carrying bag, and you can't just use anywhere as it has to be plugged into a USB port which is not always available/accessible, and/or is prone to mechanical failure (e.g. the non-USB 'calculator' type which might fit in a pocket but if something bangs into your bag, the thing is dead.)

    So anyway.. in NL we have both of the above types from some banks.

    Then there's the Postbank (largest bank, used to be gov't run, along with postal services, etc.), which works with codes.

    Their website requires you to log in via SSL, username/password and then - when making a transaction - provides you with a code. You look that code up in a list and return another code that's associated with that code. The code they choose is random, the code you send back has no correlation to the input code other than what's on their end, done.
    Prone to phishing? Perhaps, although all attempts so far have failed miserably. But just in case, they added an additional service - you can enter your cell phone number in your profile and have the code you should be sending back sent to you via text message, along with the amount of money involved in the transaction, etc.

    I don't know the exact technical details of how the latter works - I'm sticking to just a list and due diligence when banking as I'd hate to have to rely on my phone working / having signal / not being out of credits (when abroad - besides, I usually get a pay-as-you-go card when I am, as it's cheaper to make and receive calls then) / etc. when I -have- to make some payment.

  19. Market price for securid fobs by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    About $50 each at the moment. They obviously cost $0.10 to make, but you won't be able to buy them for that.

    --
    Deleted
  20. Gameshow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the record get hacked on any MMO other than WoW and know what they tell you? Tough titties. This isn't about fleecing its customer base, it's noticing a growing problem and leading the field in security nipping it in the bud. And name changes and realm changes were only introduced at the crying, demanding and pleading of its customer base. The financial aspect is a hurdle to prevent abuse imho.

  21. Do you pay for customer service? by javajeff · · Score: 1

    Blizzard has people paying for customer service. I did not like the server I was on with my son, so we were required to pay $25 per character to move. We had three characters to move, so that would have been $75. Each of my accounts has spent over $300 up to that point, and we were committed to staying with the game. We have been off of WOW for about a year now, and that would have been $360 of revenue for the past year that they could have received from me. However, I refused to pay for what I consider to be customer support. It is their game design that puts people on servers without knowing how good the connection will be or what the people will be like. Name changing should also be free as well. They find ways to charge people for what should be considered customer service. The game is a service and people do not have to buy it.

    1. Re:Do you pay for customer service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blizzard has people paying for customer service. I did not like the server I was on with my son, so we were required to pay $25 per character to move. We had three characters to move, so that would have been $75. Each of my accounts has spent over $300 up to that point, and we were committed to staying with the game. We have been off of WOW for about a year now, and that would have been $360 of revenue for the past year that they could have received from me. However, I refused to pay for what I consider to be customer support. It is their game design that puts people on servers without knowing how good the connection will be or what the people will be like. Name changing should also be free as well. They find ways to charge people for what should be considered customer service. The game is a service and people do not have to buy it.

      You can "consider" customer support to include a hand job ... don't mean squat. Take these expectations to any MMO ...go ahead ...on Age of Conan my petition was answered over a day later. You pay 15 bucks a month bub (thats new content, bug fixes, and basic server maintenance), now think about how much time you deserve from someone getting paid by the hour.

    2. Re:Do you pay for customer service? by javajeff · · Score: 1

      I play Guild Wars now, and have no problems. Convenient gaming, friendly servers, and lots of content with no monthly fee. You believe what you want, but I will likely not pay again for an MMO unless basic features are met like being able to change servers if UNHAPPY with the service. I am not too upset about name changing for Guild Wars because the characters only go to 20. However, name changing in WOW is different since your characters go to level 70. People do not want to start over, grind, or do tedious actions in order to have fun.

    3. Re:Do you pay for customer service? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      name changing in WOW is different since your characters go to level 70. People do not want to start over ...

      I wasn't "crying or whining" over name changes, but when I saw that it was available in the news screen, I stopped logging into the game and immediately changed the name of one of my characters who had a name I hated.

      One thing you left out is that you also lose bind on pickup items and all the professional skills you had accumulated. I have a level 70 Hunter with epic flyer and who is a Master Jewel Crafter able to make epic gear and I'll never redo that. A few dollars for a name change works for me.

      I don't have any real problems with how Blizzard has been conducting WoW. Money well-spent as far as entertainment value is concerned.

  22. About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    every time I saw yet another blog about how someones account got hacked and Blizzard did nothing to stop it, I'd always drop a comment about OTP and a hardware device/USB token or tying your login/password to your systems hardware in someway.

    Nice to see they finally got serious about it. Account stealing is big business. It's by far the easiest way for "Gold Farmers" to farm gold.

    What does a recently hacked person do who has no items or money? Yeah they buy gold. So they hack your account, steal your gold and then sell it back to you. Brilliant !

  23. Ever think about other markets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever think about other markets such as the Korean market where most people use an internet cafe to access the game instead of their own computer? Having an authentication like this could be extreme valuable to those who are not playing on their own computers. And remember these areas have been known to beat and kill each other over this kinda stuff.

  24. Phones OTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather get a phone call than have to type in numbers from the pad thing... I think RSA, PhoneFactor, Authentfy all do this.

  25. ...but what *are* they? by cduffy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I googled around earlier to try to determine whether these are VeriSign VIP devices. If so, that'd be great -- they'd interoperate with PayPal and eBay and VeriSign's OpenID provider and anyone else who either supports OpenID or signs up for VeriSign's program.

    Making tech-happy people carry around more than one OTP device would be a real shame, so I'll be disappointed if more word on these comes out and it turns out that they don't interoperate.

  26. Why use passwords in this day and age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nowadays we have dual key cryptography, which is a much better way to identify safely.
    Why the hell do so many things even still work with passwords?

  27. Uhm... by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    I work at a cibercafé, and indeed, several WoW accounts have been stolen the last two weeks, via use of keyloggers. Nothing specially advanced, but we noticed a bit too late.
    Anyhow, for me, stealing a WoW account is pretty much like stealing a crack addict's pipe, I don't really feel any compassion for the player. That thing is a digital drug.

    1. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That thing is a digital drug.

      And that makes you a digital drug dealer. How does it feel to be the scum of the earth?

    2. Re:Uhm... by Windwraith · · Score: 1

      Heh! Pretty clever reply.
      Unfortunately, you are wrong. We only rent the machines and connection, we do not provide WoW and other gaming software unless the client installs it. I might transcribe our rental policy if you feel interested.
      Amusingly our rate of software piracy is tremendously low...everyone has the original game with them to install, 99% of the times.

    3. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I see, so you don't sell the drugs, you just sell the glass pipes, vaporizers, freebase kits, and syringes.

  28. Problem plaguing other MMOs as well by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    Square-Enix has been taking some rather draconian steps to protect Final Fantasy XI accounts as well, where the main culprit is apparently passwords getting stolen through Flash vulnerabilities, usually through websites of questionable character.

    The thing is, you know this isn't happening through news aggregator sites or pr0n sites or whatever, these attacks are aimed at players through websites that focus on the game. It seems to me that the easiest way to solve the problem of these attacks is for the game publishers to provide these information and services (which players generally need to get anywhere in these games) themselves. But so far they seem content to let "the community" handle creating and maintaining these sites, and then paying through the nose for the security problems such heavy reliance on third parties bring.

  29. Yes by Snaller · · Score: 1

    For one ting its not a dongle (my submission was better) - for the other apparently hundreds get hacked each their, their character stripped bare and sold, and their accounts used to spam gold commercials in the game and on the web boards.

    As for requiring it, no - the couldn't do that.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  30. You have to contact support by Snaller · · Score: 1

    And get a new one.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  31. Where the hell do you live! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Nowhere ever have I seen USB keys at such a low price, even the cheapest slowest 512mb one would be 10 dollars more expensive.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Where the hell do you live! by pipatron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, maybe I exaggerated a little. $7 for 1GB, shipping included: http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.12245

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    2. Re:Where the hell do you live! by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Nifty.
      Wonder how fast it is.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  32. A secure password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will spend the $6.00 when Blizzard upgrades their password auth system. As it stands now the password system is not case sensitive.

    Regardless how you type your password as long as it matches the order you are going to get in.

  33. It's not their job to catch them by Snaller · · Score: 1

    They are not the police.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  34. Or you are an idiot by Snaller · · Score: 1

    I personally know someone who got hacked, she has no idea how it happened (I would guess a virus infection from a hacked third party website).

    Blizzard offers this - if the idiots out there can't spare the one time charge of 7 bucks they are free to not do it.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  35. Centralize this, make it available for everyone by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    OTPs are great, I would love to see something like this rolled into OpenID or some other 3rd party service that provides authentication.

  36. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow is for fucking faggots.

  37. Yes, it's that big of a problem by lewp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have compromised World of Warcraft accounts become such a serious problem, that OTPs are already neccesary for games?


    Absolutely. Accounts are constantly getting hacked in the game to the point where the GMs can't keep up with the restores (such that it sometimes takes two weeks or more to get some of the items you lost back).

    Compared to credit card numbers and bank accounts, WoW accounts are quite valuable. A high end account can be worth several hundred dollars in gold and materials (or you can just sell the account altogether if you can hold onto it long enough), and there's little to no risk in dealing with them. AFAIK, police aren't actively pursuing people hacking WoW accounts, and since Blizzard restores the virtual items and money anyway (eventually... for the most part), there's little reason to.

    It's probably a lucrative business, and people are certainly treating it that way.

    --
    Game... blouses.
  38. Screw SecuROM and similar crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make these things required to play a game and stop messing with the computer and operating system.

    I was looking forward to Spore, but with SecurROM on both Windows and Mac OS X, forget it.

    And with Starcraft II and Diablo III coming "soon", who needs EA and their anti-consumers practices anyway?

  39. For the love of cake, it's not a 1 time password.. by Nonseq · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's Two Factor Authentication. The token is a standard two factor token, which will be required "in addition to your username and password", therefore, it's two factor. 1st - factor, username/password. 2nd - factor token six digit generated password based on time. And yes it's a big problem. Apparently a "good" credit card number is worth about $5 on the black market, but a WoW account is worth $20. Go figure.

  40. WoW region coding == no WoW for the jet set by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Account is tied permanently to region(IP) and cannot be logged in from any other region.

    People who travel internationally with a notebook computer will likely vote with their dollars/euros against such a measure.

  41. China .. home of the factory embedded malware by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1

    Yup, contracting these from China sure makes a lot of sense. One Chinese product has already been found with factory embedded software designed specifically to get WoW account info. Of course, that was probably just a proof of concept for a product with a far more malicious payload (corporate espionage as well as just plain vanilla espionage and larceny).

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  42. Common my ass. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I am in a very large guild and not one of the members has been hacked in months. The only two "hacks" that occurred before that were from account sharing to farm BGs.

    In other words, the majority of so called hacks can be limited to.

    1. Sharing accounts (this is big, I don't understand how you can trust someone you never met in the flesh with your account info)
    2. Buying accounts (and subsequent original owner recalling it)
    3. Stupid use of the same userid for either in game names or non-blizzard forums. Points for those dumb enough to use the same password.
    4. Powerleveling services.
    5. Rarely, disgruntled SOs

    It might be a serious problem but its not a common one. If it were common every WOW-hater would be shouting it out on competing game forums or wherever such haters gather.

    What this does do is give people more assurance that they can't get compromised when they get careless, like not using good virus checkers for windows users and visiting a compromised site or having partaken of any of the items I listed.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  43. How about by superphreak · · Score: 1

    Keepass on a USB stick? Although if the problem is phishing, I guess it wouldn't help much. Anyone smart enough to use keepass should be smart enough to see a phishing attempt - yes or no?

    --
    Evolution is a state-sponsored, state-protected religion.
  44. What about Blizzard USA? by chiph · · Score: 1

    The article is from Blizzard Europe. Will the US division also be issuing (err, selling) keytokens?

    Chip H

    1. Re:What about Blizzard USA? by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      Supposedly, yes.

      http://www.wowinsider.com/2008/06/26/blizzard-authenticator-to-be-introduced-at-the-worldwide-invitat/

      I submitted this last week, but it was rejected. I'm guessing because WoW Insider is not considered a reliable source.

  45. better than BofA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    better security than Bank of America

  46. Well, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have compromised World of Warcraft accounts become such a serious problem, that OTPs are already neccesary for games?

    Oh yes. It really is.

    Stolen World of Warcraft accounts are now worth more on the black market than stolen credit card numbers. Bizarre, you might think - but perhaps not. Some people will pay real money for virtual gold (even if it is against the rules to do so); but who ever got arrested for stealing a game account?

    A large number of keylogger worms have been commissioned and custom-crafted just for World of Warcraft (and a couple of other MMOs); they're even trying to buy (and succeeding in at least one case) 0day vulnerabilities in Flash to power them. A lot of phishing goes on too, of course.

    Blame RMT companies willing to accept shady affiliates, American spammers, and the Chinese spammers working for them. This is a real problem, and organised crime is starting to weigh in on it.

    I guess Blizzard are doing the best they can in the circumstances. They're not responsible for the security of the end-user's computer, but this might help.

  47. Easier solution by SupremoMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not have the game generate on screen keyboard that has letters in different place every time, and you then have to key in your password using the mouse by clicking on the pictures of the letters. Even if a key logger captured your mouse movements, it still would fail as the keyboard would change.

    1. Re:Easier solution by SevenDigitUID · · Score: 1

      Because a good keylogger captures the screen at every click.

    2. Re:Easier solution by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      Have a way around that too, but it gets a bit more complicated.

  48. OK, but what are Euros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where can I get six of them?
    Are they a boss drop or random?

  49. Unable to export by Mistakill · · Score: 1

    Blizzard apparently cant export these outside the USA currently, supposedly due to encryption export laws. The Customer service GM's cant get a confirmation from Blizzard's Legal Dept. until sometime this week http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=7475462573&sid=1

  50. not debian by grusin · · Score: 0

    I hope that dongle is not debian based, otherwise all accounts will belong to the one who first enters 4444

  51. If you're tied of WoW (Off topic) by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    If you're tired of grinding mobs, chinese gold farmers, twinks, gankers and knowing that the game is stat boxes duking it out... try PlanetSide. It's an MMFPS (the O is redundant).

    In PlanetSide, the fight does not always go to the player who has the most spare time to grind. Skill, understanding of the game and organized teams win. The power curve in PS is very shallow in comparison to D&D like games. After two or three hours you'll have access to the same equipment as someone like me who has played for 5 years. You'll have a tank, and i'll have a tank... i'll just have a plane and a troop carrier as well. In WoW, i often played just to make levels, in PS i play to play (to have fun). WoW often felt like a part time job. The day i seriously considered buying gold with real money was the day i quit. In PS there's no need for that, because anything player A can get B can get as well.

    You'll get ganked, but you'll be able to fight back and win (if you're the better player). Better yet, you tell your outfit mates the position of the sniper and call in an air strike. PS is rich in tactical and strategic depth. Sure you can be a brainless foot zerg pretending that you're playing Quake, but you'll get much further if you treat it like Counter Strike. You'll get further still if you treat it like an all out planet spanning war.

    In PS, i'm the commander of the spec ops division in an outfit (guild) called Ghosts of the Revolution. My team does surgical strike far behind enemy lines to cut power and benefits to the enemy's front line. Specifically, we target the enemy's ability to spawn large/high tech vehicles and aircraft. When my empire has full size tanks and the enemy has mini-tanks... my empire wins.

    If you want to try it out, create a character in the Vanu Sovereignty empire on the Gemini (US) server. Be there on Thursday night at 1930 eastern and look for/send a tell to N1H1L.

    gotr.net /no, i don't work for Sony, i just really enjoy this game and think that many others would too if they gave it a chance

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  52. Account theft... by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason I'm glad to be moving toward playing under Linux instead of directly under windows. I know I'm not 100% immune but many of the mainstream attacks are eliminated.

  53. Now if other companies would follow... by Xuenay · · Score: 1

    Good for Blizzard. I've wished for a while that Gmail would implement an optional OTP system - every now and then you need to access your e-mail from a netcafe or otherwise insecure location, and I really wouldn't want anybody to get access to my mail account.

  54. No, they're not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I asked VeriSign about this, and they said that the Blizzard token isn't part of their VIP service.

    That really sucks Blizzard -- why won't you let me use my PayPal token for WoW?