He dared it and even to fall under hate crime law there would have to be a crime in the first place the only crime right now is that a pathological narcissist like Thompson is not seeing a shrink.
The jury system wasn't born with the lower class, it was born from trials for people who had to and were aware of how pretty much everything in their country worked, since it was family matters anyway. It was not about average people, it was about being judged by peers, and the people who initially had that right were the aristocracy.
The research in question was generally flawed and the results were questioned - the methodology was also shoddy. In about all but one of these studies.
Hell, that thing smokes the average netbook. Which I've only seen once on XP and I'd never have described that as swimmingly even compared to the very bloated kdemod-4 available with archlinux when you install everything (which was itself on the rather slow side).
2. Ah, yes, these nonexistent manpages I spent every other day browsing when i first started using linux. I must have imagined them. Is ubuntu's documentation less good? sure - but again, I question the FreeBSD manpages' reputation as "without par"
4. Do tell, please, why then the market is divided between BSD variants and Linux in the embedded world, could it be that, gasp, it actually scales down. Of course this is about Ubuntu, which is not build for ricers but for desktop use mostly.
The problem is that user-friendly is measured using average users as a yardstick, with the assumption that more user-friendly = less techie user can get by. Which leads to the problem that the relatively average-user-friendly Ubuntu is pretty easy to hose if you stray away. For all it's worth, imo, Geek-proofing an OS is pretty much impossible.
1. Agreed, I think neither is really better and use depends on what you need, which of course some Linux and BSD zealots seem to disagree on - apparently the main free *nix are now entrenched enough to be part of the unix holy wars.
2. Varies, FreeBSD doesn't have perfect docs either and other distros do have better docs
3. Lrn2LTR
4. Yes, it does, there's a 10MB barebones installer for the dedicated and if you need less, pick another distro, even FreeBSD will probably be tons of tweaking at this point.
What do you expect with so many comments about how "zomg corrupt mexican border guards will seize your things when you get back" because of course it's the mexicans who are doing it and checking who enters in the US of A is Mexico's job.
That was only a Bush point in the most superficial of ways, the tone of the OP was that we suddenly had someone who was hinting that we had somebody whose understanding of ecnomics was keeping doing more Chicago-boy-masturbations just in case they might work after 30 years of failures.
Slashdot Mirror
There's not difference between email and phone in terms of "on the cheap" except in the eyes of moronic luddites.
So you're suggesting we jettison almost a century's worth of law
- there, corrected for you
Lowering taxes won't help the working class
120 years
He dared it and even to fall under hate crime law there would have to be a crime in the first place the only crime right now is that a pathological narcissist like Thompson is not seeing a shrink.
The jury system wasn't born with the lower class, it was born from trials for people who had to and were aware of how pretty much everything in their country worked, since it was family matters anyway. It was not about average people, it was about being judged by peers, and the people who initially had that right were the aristocracy.
Frasier, except they're supposed to be part of the wealthy.
Er, no, only in some weird fantasy land did it ever mean that, it used to be that apprenticeships and bachelors' lasted until you were 25.
The research in question was generally flawed and the results were questioned - the methodology was also shoddy. In about all but one of these studies.
Hell, that thing smokes the average netbook. Which I've only seen once on XP and I'd never have described that as swimmingly even compared to the very bloated kdemod-4 available with archlinux when you install everything (which was itself on the rather slow side).
To be very honest, the unnoficial DarwinOS logo is not much more awesome to people who'd think Tux and Beastie are too cutesy.
2. Ah, yes, these nonexistent manpages I spent every other day browsing when i first started using linux. I must have imagined them. Is ubuntu's documentation less good? sure - but again, I question the FreeBSD manpages' reputation as "without par"
4. Do tell, please, why then the market is divided between BSD variants and Linux in the embedded world, could it be that, gasp, it actually scales down. Of course this is about Ubuntu, which is not build for ricers but for desktop use mostly.
And it's only about remembered by geeks anymore who watch it for the admirable snark bait and drinking games. But it was a nice, if stupid, try.
The problem is that user-friendly is measured using average users as a yardstick, with the assumption that more user-friendly = less techie user can get by. Which leads to the problem that the relatively average-user-friendly Ubuntu is pretty easy to hose if you stray away. For all it's worth, imo, Geek-proofing an OS is pretty much impossible.
1. Agreed, I think neither is really better and use depends on what you need, which of course some Linux and BSD zealots seem to disagree on - apparently the main free *nix are now entrenched enough to be part of the unix holy wars.
2. Varies, FreeBSD doesn't have perfect docs either and other distros do have better docs
3. Lrn2LTR
4. Yes, it does, there's a 10MB barebones installer for the dedicated and if you need less, pick another distro, even FreeBSD will probably be tons of tweaking at this point.
5. Political strawman yay
6. Call the whambulance.
I think plain clothes officers have obviously made much of a difference in people's opinion since they convince tools like you.
There's a slight latency hit because they're entirely based in Ontario, but they do serve in at least Montreal.
Primarily malware network with hints that they used to be useful.
What do you expect with so many comments about how "zomg corrupt mexican border guards will seize your things when you get back" because of course it's the mexicans who are doing it and checking who enters in the US of A is Mexico's job.
No, it has nothing to do with Bush, it has to do with an apparent Chicago worshipper. You built up a strawman around your own intent.
That was only a Bush point in the most superficial of ways, the tone of the OP was that we suddenly had someone who was hinting that we had somebody whose understanding of ecnomics was keeping doing more Chicago-boy-masturbations just in case they might work after 30 years of failures.
You decided to build a strawman from it.
It wasn't about bush, stop smoking the straw on your strawmen.
*magically have control of things in 6 months, although the typoed sentence is similarly true
1. A government doesn't magically have control of things
2. YOU made it a Bush point.
No, you entirely misread the point because you decided to be a partisan moron instead.