It rather seems to me that the community would hack in the missing bits pretty fast. Be has some neat features... and is somewhat compatible with most GNU stuff.
I figure as long as emacs, vi and gcc run on it'd be back on its feet pretty quickly, and with a lot more hardware support. Unless, I suppose, like, 90% of the 'technology' is licenced.
Yeah, i remember buggin them for details about it =( I was real disapointed that GC was never ported... i just love those kind of games!
AFAIK, i checked there web pages a while ago and there is no mention of anything there, about anything.
Linux fragmentation: no big deal
on
Storm Linux
·
· Score: 1
The *BSD ppl are having a linux bashing fit, but really, with LSB on the way, i don't see any problems with having a lot of distros.
Right now, i don't see any of these so called damages done by fragmentation, and when I see some concrete problems, which i seriously doubt i ever will thanks to the above mentioned LSB, we will deal with that then. Probably with adjustments to LSB.
Hence, the fix is already on the way. So give it a rest.
(since everyone else is doing it =) I'm a Linux and OpenBSD user. I like both, even freebsd. I don't get it why the bsd ppl attack linux so much.)
That thing is kick ass for a laugh, more then a few times its put out something fairly questionable =) I remember it said something about Bill Gates and Steve Jobs "fondling" each other =P
OK, thats a bit odd really. I'm a PC user, although not i'm really loyal to the platform (but i am loyal to my Linux, even a little rabid). I would be loyal to the hardware, if it was any good. =)
I mean, lets fact it. Intel and its whole little set of 80's baggage is not very good by my stretch of the word. Its to bad.
So blah, if you have iMAC envy, buy an iMAC, put linux on it, E and what nasty iMAC theme. There ya go.
I think you already know who. The kind of people (?) who buy a computer based on how it looks. Or worse, the kind of people who buy a computer to look modern in front of there friends. Thats who.
These are computer bud! Need never entered the picture in the first place! Bah! If you have the CPU time, why not have a 3d window mangler, with sound, and peely windows and rotating menus and other worthless but buzzword compliant stuff! =)
Re:Top X "Digital" Shows on PBS This Fall
on
PBS Goes Digital
·
· Score: 0
I donno for faulty towers, maybe he could have a shitty web portal or something? =P hehe
Can Science create the existence a living being? Oh yes, of course we can.
Can it create life by your definition? Why not?
Your being simple, a cloned human would be physicaly very similar to the original, however, within keeping of certain genetic traits, it will grow up to be like whatever it develops to be. It might be Happy and "Live" my your definition, or be misserable and not. The fact it has been cloned has no bearing on this.
Now, thats probably obvious to anyone.
the "Psychiatry and psychoanalysis" you so readily attack don't have all the facts, and guess what fundy? no one does. The good ones do more then just preach lies, they try and find the missing information. Sometimes they get bad results, thems the breaks, but its better then lying.
Finally, i would like to say "Here! Here it is you bastards!!" to those religeous assholes you always said that Science and only take life away. Any inteligent person realizes that of course, this is not true and never has been. Those religeous freaks are always the first in like for the booster shots should something go wrong.
Well anyway, now science can create life, for sure, here it is out in the open, and you still fight it.
2. No "Statement" its a fact of the marketplace. The goal of most companies is to get a monopoly. Take this with a grain of salt, they don't want the DOJ hounding them, but they want a LOT of room. Thats fine.
I'll give you these facts, yeah. About R3 and R4, its a beta so i'll admit that is probably nothing. Probably.
And no, Binary Compatibility is not broken every few kernel releases. Its not. Its just plain not. I can run apps from 2.0.36/7 with 2.2.10 fine. It might be broken between 1's and 2's, but not between 2.0 and 2.2.
Yeah thats true enough, I suppose 25 bux isnt piracy yet, i wasnt aware you could download the upgrade.
I'll give it that its free for download right now, but the major revisions arnt. I'm not specifically pointing out Be Inc right now, but I think that all of these companies eventually succum to greed. Right now, only major revisions. But i'll bet they'll start releasing MS-Style major version upgrades, price tag included.
My whole point is that even the possibility of these kind of problems don't exist with a truly free OS, like Linux, Free/Open/NetBSD, HURD or whatever.
For the record to, I bought a copy of BeOS to take a look at it (i like playing with OS's), and sure enough, its a nice OS. I bought good hardware so everything worked out of the box. I would love BeOS a hell of a lot if it was OpenSource =( But its not and I think people should make a note of that, in the future Be Inc will probably get corrupted.
Make me -1 coz you don't agree with that i'm saying, how lame.
Mabye i'm wrong, that would be good if i'm wrong, really. Competition is good. But mabye i'm right? What your saying is coz you don't agree with me you don't want people to even read my post.
And didnt just put "BEOS SUX" i gave some reasons. Flamebait, mabye, but -1?
Slashdot Mirror
It rather seems to me that the community would hack in the missing bits pretty fast. Be has some neat features... and is somewhat compatible with most GNU stuff.
I figure as long as emacs, vi and gcc run on it'd be back on its feet pretty quickly, and with a lot more hardware support. Unless, I suppose, like, 90% of the 'technology' is licenced.
--SD
Yeah, i remember buggin them for details about it =(
I was real disapointed that GC was never ported... i just love those kind of games!
AFAIK, i checked there web pages a while ago and there is no mention of anything there, about anything.
The *BSD ppl are having a linux bashing fit, but really, with LSB on the way, i don't see any problems with having a lot of distros.
Right now, i don't see any of these so called damages done by fragmentation, and when I see some concrete problems, which i seriously doubt i ever will thanks to the above mentioned LSB, we will deal with that then. Probably with adjustments to LSB.
Hence, the fix is already on the way. So give it a rest.
(since everyone else is doing it =) I'm a Linux and OpenBSD user. I like both, even freebsd. I don't get it why the bsd ppl attack linux so much.)
That thing is kick ass for a laugh, more then a few times its put out something fairly questionable =) I remember it said something about Bill Gates and Steve Jobs "fondling" each other =P
No kidding this fool is a drone, linux is NOT trendy you pufta!
I'm tired of MS-Drones saying that!
only at 3am? Wow, those are fast then. If I rebuilt everything on muh intel, it would have to have started sometime last year.
I suppose I could have myself frozen (take a nap in the deep freezer) and wake up, tada!
Mind you, that wouldnt work (well, ignoring the fact i'd be dead) the power company would complain about bills =(
Yeah, of course it does =)
The 2.3's have it and there are patches floating around for the 2.2's.
OK, thats a bit odd really. I'm a PC user, although not i'm really loyal to the platform (but i am loyal to my Linux, even a little rabid). I would be loyal to the hardware, if it was any good. =)
I mean, lets fact it. Intel and its whole little set of 80's baggage is not very good by my stretch of the word. Its to bad.
So blah, if you have iMAC envy, buy an iMAC, put linux on it, E and what nasty iMAC theme. There ya go.
Whether Mac Users want to admit it or not, there are a lot of reasons to hate Apple, and MacOS in general.
I think you already know who. The kind of people (?) who buy a computer based on how it looks.
Or worse, the kind of people who buy a computer to look modern in front of there friends.
Thats who.
Need? What is this "Need".
These are computer bud! Need never entered the picture in the first place! Bah! If you have the CPU time, why not have a 3d window mangler, with sound, and peely windows and rotating menus and other worthless but buzzword compliant stuff! =)
I donno for faulty towers, maybe he could have a shitty web portal or something? =P
hehe
www.fawltyportal.com =)
I'm not done!
What would happen is that Emperor Gates would pass our Net Gov't a cool million and WHAM
MS-Internet.
That would ruin the internet forever if you elected a government. This place would no longer be free.
Sure, for the first while it might be nice but what happens when our little internet gov't gets corrupt?
Can Science create the existence a living being? Oh yes, of course we can.
Can it create life by your definition?
Why not?
Your being simple, a cloned human would be physicaly very similar to the original, however, within keeping of certain genetic traits, it will grow up to be like whatever it develops to be.
It might be Happy and "Live" my your definition, or be misserable and not. The fact it has been cloned has no bearing on this.
Now, thats probably obvious to anyone.
the "Psychiatry and psychoanalysis" you so readily attack don't have all the facts, and guess what fundy? no one does. The good ones do more then just preach lies, they try and find the missing information. Sometimes they get bad results, thems the breaks, but its better then lying.
Finally, i would like to say "Here! Here it is you bastards!!" to those religeous assholes you always said that Science and only take life away. Any inteligent person realizes that of course, this is not true and never has been. Those religeous freaks are always the first in like for the booster shots should something go wrong.
Well anyway, now science can create life, for sure, here it is out in the open, and you still fight it.
AHah good idea.
MS: "AHa! Ms Office for linux!! only a billion dollars."
Linux ppl: "kick ass, new version of tetex is out!"
use the right term!!
Aha! But you could be a MS-Spy send to make us disregard the truth, by planting this here you could be really discounting the truth as paranoia.
Wouldnt that be clever?
No! i have last post! ahhaahah!
=)
I already made a note of 1. In previous posts.
2. No "Statement" its a fact of the marketplace. The goal of most companies is to get a monopoly. Take this with a grain of salt, they don't want the DOJ hounding them, but they want a LOT of room. Thats fine.
3. OK, i'll give that.
Touchy.
I'll give you these facts, yeah.
About R3 and R4, its a beta so i'll admit that is probably nothing. Probably.
And no, Binary Compatibility is not broken every few kernel releases. Its not. Its just plain not. I can run apps from 2.0.36/7 with 2.2.10 fine. It might be broken between 1's and 2's, but not between 2.0 and 2.2.
Yeah thats true enough, I suppose 25 bux isnt piracy yet, i wasnt aware you could download the upgrade.
I'll give it that its free for download right now, but the major revisions arnt. I'm not specifically pointing out Be Inc right now, but I think that all of these companies eventually succum to greed. Right now, only major revisions. But i'll bet they'll start releasing MS-Style major version upgrades, price tag included.
My whole point is that even the possibility of these kind of problems don't exist with a truly free OS, like Linux, Free/Open/NetBSD, HURD or whatever.
For the record to, I bought a copy of BeOS to take a look at it (i like playing with OS's), and sure enough, its a nice OS. I bought good hardware so everything worked out of the box. I would love BeOS a hell of a lot if it was OpenSource =(
But its not and I think people should make a note of that, in the future Be Inc will probably get corrupted.
Make me -1 coz you don't agree with that i'm saying, how lame.
Mabye i'm wrong, that would be good if i'm wrong, really. Competition is good.
But mabye i'm right? What your saying is coz you don't agree with me you don't want people to even read my post.
And didnt just put "BEOS SUX" i gave some reasons.
Flamebait, mabye, but -1?
Heh, i'm not sure if you knew this...
but you don't have to compile sound support in!!
Woah!!
Come on you troll, you know better then this.
Least your not an AC.
Hey, this problem is easily fixed. /boot and it works fine.
/usr/src/linux/System.map /boot)
When you compile the kernel, it generates a System.map, just copy that to
(e.g. cp
have fun