Wikis work if people constantly modify and tune them, and provide content. They don't complete themselves. It sounds like you need trainers, rather than throwing nontechnical people at what is essentially a technical solution.
When did you already tell your boss you'd have this done by?
Hello, you seem to think that Slashdot is a discussion forum, when instead it's just a place for insecure neckbeards to troll, post memes, complain about CmdrTaco, and mention how BSD is dying. If you want actual discussion, find the site on the Internet that's most diametrically opposed to Slashdot, and try there.
Why do we need the State Science Institute telling us that we need better control over the processor supply chain? Companies for whom this is important will implement it, and the rest won't. It's a self-correcting problem. And 10 million? If you're going to go out and nationalize the production of processors that's chump change, do it right, at least.
If you dont have hotplug hardware with its udev nonsense, and you don't have a GUI, and your users don't log in interactively to the OS, why do you need systemd and all its crap? init + an rc script to launch $YOUR_APP and you're done.
The bastard child of a trashy hardware site (i.e. not Anandtech, maybe TH or one of the other lamer ones) and OSNews. Did they round out the article with meaningless, unlabelled graphs?
Hooray, getting more plastic knockoff versions of things, produced by slaves (hint: Communism doesn't treat people kindly), with zero regard for the environment, and shipped halfway across the planet.
When those 3000 dudes come home, and go back through the major US airports, back to their families distributed across the country, and THEN spread the disease, it's going to be awesome.
Never wasting a good crisis, the President and administration will use this as an opportunity for massive federalization of health care and private sectore business.
As a RHEL server admin, the only thing I see systemd adding is complexity. Do a fresh install and compare it to RHEL5 or 6, and you have way more stuff running, new start/stop methods for init scripts, weird NTP replacements, and a bunch of stuff that you don't need. Then you go and install your app, or something like Postfix (because you're building a mail server). Why do you need parallel boot? udev hotpluggery? a "logind" process?
Slashdot Mirror
Because udev and reasons and hotplug and FooKit and PID1.
Call me when RedHat ships systemd-catalystdriver, until then I'm not touching this old, crufty technology that's clearly not ready for the Cloud.
Systemd sucks, "FreeDesktop" sucks, and you suck. DIAF.
"From each according to ability, do each according to his need."
Steve Wozniak is a god.
To lay a groundwork for "data driven science" shows the bankruptcy of modern education and culture.
Don't worry, with systemd we'll catch up to Windows any day!
+1
For me its time for a car upgrade, and I'm strongly considering a Tesla. No more oil changes, ever.
Wikis work if people constantly modify and tune them, and provide content. They don't complete themselves. It sounds like you need trainers, rather than throwing nontechnical people at what is essentially a technical solution.
When did you already tell your boss you'd have this done by?
Because "editors".
Hello, you seem to think that Slashdot is a discussion forum, when instead it's just a place for insecure neckbeards to troll, post memes, complain about CmdrTaco, and mention how BSD is dying. If you want actual discussion, find the site on the Internet that's most diametrically opposed to Slashdot, and try there.
This is a joke, right? Or is this the year of the Linux desktop?
Why do we need the State Science Institute telling us that we need better control over the processor supply chain? Companies for whom this is important will implement it, and the rest won't. It's a self-correcting problem. And 10 million? If you're going to go out and nationalize the production of processors that's chump change, do it right, at least.
So basically you're a south american country...
Move to where the food is.
That's a trivial fix with standard init scripts. In fact, why take down the interfaces at all, just reboot.
If you dont have hotplug hardware with its udev nonsense, and you don't have a GUI, and your users don't log in interactively to the OS, why do you need systemd and all its crap? init + an rc script to launch $YOUR_APP and you're done.
Of course Memedot has to trash Branson, a businessman, over Musk, a trendy-named dotcom guy with a penchant for electric cars.
The bastard child of a trashy hardware site (i.e. not Anandtech, maybe TH or one of the other lamer ones) and OSNews. Did they round out the article with meaningless, unlabelled graphs?
Hooray, getting more plastic knockoff versions of things, produced by slaves (hint: Communism doesn't treat people kindly), with zero regard for the environment, and shipped halfway across the planet.
And that's the root of it. The socialist hatred of profit.
When those 3000 dudes come home, and go back through the major US airports, back to their families distributed across the country, and THEN spread the disease, it's going to be awesome.
Never wasting a good crisis, the President and administration will use this as an opportunity for massive federalization of health care and private sectore business.
As a RHEL server admin, the only thing I see systemd adding is complexity. Do a fresh install and compare it to RHEL5 or 6, and you have way more stuff running, new start/stop methods for init scripts, weird NTP replacements, and a bunch of stuff that you don't need. Then you go and install your app, or something like Postfix (because you're building a mail server). Why do you need parallel boot? udev hotpluggery? a "logind" process?
Why upgrade, Windows7 does everything I need.
The real one.
Read it.
Fear it.